Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2758_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
Drug-Induced Vasculitis
https://t.me/medicina_free
177
patients with PTU-associated DIV had a positive MPO-ANCA on serological testing. Renal mani­festations were common with proteinuria and/or microscopic haematuria in 57% of cases. Renal involvement was an important cause of morbidity and end-stage renal disease was reported in eight patients, four of whom underwent kidney trans­plant. Extreme cases of PTU-associated cutane­ous vasculitis have been reported causing extensive skin involvement with progression to widespread, full-thickness skin necrosis, septic shock and death (Wall etal. 2017).
3.4 Cocaine/Levamisole
One of the more commonly reported and studied forms of DIV relates to cocaine misuse. Cocaine purchased for illicit use is frequently contami­nated with the anti-helminth drug levamisole. Powdered levamisole, which is normally used in veterinary practice, resembles cocaine and has been used as an additive (a “cutting agent”) in cocaine and crack cocaine, bulking up the drug to increase prot for the dealer. In addition, a metabolite of levamisole potentiates the stimula­tory effects of cocaine. However, levamisole is highly immunogenic and is the source of cocaine­induced DIV. Patients present with clinical fea­tures resembling an ANCA-associated vasculitis, which include fever, neutropenia, arthralgia, pur­pura and other signs of cutaneous vasculitis. Some users will develop midline destructive lesions characterized by localized granulomatous inammation around the nasopharynx, destruc­tion of the nasal septum and, in severe cases, saddle nose deformity (Marquez etal. 2017). A distinguishing feature is that these patients are often positive for multiple autoantibodies including ANCA, ANA, anti-phospholipid and anti- dsDNA antibodies. ANCA antibodies tend to be non-specic; patients can be MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA positive (Marquez etal. 2017; Carmona-Rivera etal. 2017).
Addiction counselling is of key importance for these patients as cessation of cocaine misuse will result in resolution of the vasculitis in most
cases (Marquez et al. 2017). Occasionally, the vasculitis will perpetuate or will be severe enough to warrant immune suppression with steroids and immunomodulatory therapy (Marquez et al.
2017).
3.5 Cancer Immunotherapy
The development of immunotherapy in the treat­ment of cancer has dramatically improved the life expectancy of patients with solid organ tumours, haematological malignancies and melanoma. The most commonly prescribed immunothera­peutic drugs are checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) which enhance the anti-tumour activity of T-cells resulting in tumour suppression and regression, even in patients with unresectable metastatic dis­ease (Kostine et al. 2019). The use of CPIs is associated with a wide variety of manifestations resembling autoimmune disease, collectively termed immune related adverse events irAEs (Calabrese etal. 2018). The frequency of irAEs has been reported to be high, up to 90% in some studies (Calabrese etal. 2018). The majority of irAEs are rheumatic in nature resembling rheu­matoid arthritis or polymyalgia rheumatica; how­ever, polymyositis, scleroderma, sicca syndrome and vasculitis syndromes can also occur (Kostine etal. 2019). In one systematic review of vasculi­tis associated with CPIs, the authors found 20 case reports that met their denition for inclusion (Daxini etal. 2018). The majority of cases were associated with melanoma and the most common manifestations of vasculitis were giant cell arteri­tis and primary CNS vasculitis. Cases of digital vasculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis and cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis were also reported.
The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades irAEs from 1-to-5 based on the severity (grades 1 and 2 are mild, grade 5 is fatal) (Puzanov et al. 2017). Grade 1 events do not typically require interven­tion while grade 3 or higher usually warrants intervention with corticosteroids, immunomodu­lation and cessation of the CPI. An important observation is that many irAEs can persist despite
178
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Stack
cessation of CPI (Calabrese etal. 2018). In these cases, a close liaison between patient and oncolo­gist is required to formulate a decision about the continuation of CPI therapy.
4 Pathogenesis
Perhaps the most studied form of DIV is cocaine– levamisole vasculitis. Our understanding of this entity has helped to uncover pathogenetic princi­ples which may underlie other DIV syndromes.
The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) has been shown to be an important mech­anism through which cocaine–levamisole can ini­tiate autoimmunity leading to vasculitis (Carmona-Rivera etal. 2017; Lood and Hughes
2017; Pieterse and van der Vlag 2017). The pro-
cess of NET release is known as NETosis, a type of neutrophil programmed cell death in which chromatin bres (the breakdown product of DNA, histones and granule-derived anti­microbial proteins) are expelled from cells (Brinkmann and Zychlinsky 2012). It is a power­ful defence mechanism used by the body to ght pathogens that are too large to be phagocytosed. Aberrant NETosis has been identied as a feature of autoimmune disease, thrombosis and malig­nancy (Kaplan and Radic 2012). Lemavisole has been shown to generate NETs enriched in neutro­phil elastase (NE), a neutrophil-derived protein which is highly immunogenic and capable of stimulating expression of ANCA (Lood and Hughes 2017). Continuous generation of NETs is hypothesized to lead to a breakdown in immune tolerance. NETs become pathogenic and lead to a perpetuation of the immune response with result­ing inammation and vasculitis (Pieterse and van der Vlag 2017). In addition, cocaine and/or levamisole are both capable of upregulating expression of B cell activating factor (BAFF), a key stimulant of B cell replication and differen­tiation, which may increase ANCA production and explain why ANCA titres can persist long after cocaine cessation (Lood and Hughes 2017).
These above mechanisms may shed light on other forms of drug-induced vasculitis. For example, DIV associated with PTU has also been associated with NETosis and MPO-ANCA gen-
eration in rats, which has been shown to cause pauci-immune glomerulonephritis and pulmo­nary capillaritis (Nakazawa etal. 2012).
Vasculitis and other irAEs associated with CPIs are not associated with auto-antibody for­mation and tend not to regress once the CPI has been discontinued (Calabrese et al. 2018). The mechanism by which irAEs occur remains unknown however a number of mechanisms are proposed. One hypothesis suggests that CPIs, acting on the host immune system, impair immune tolerance leading to autoimmunity. Another proposes that CPIs result in the unmask­ing of pre-existing autoimmunity. T-cell epitope spreading has also been suggested, whereby T-cells start to recognize and react to healthy host tissue antigen in addition to tumour antigen (Calabrese etal. 2018).
5 Conclusion
There are a wide variety of drugs associated with DIV, and a drug aetiology needs to be considered in all patients presenting with vasculitis. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for systemic disease involvement in patients with DIV and to examine the patient and investigate appropriately. Ultimately, however, DIV is a diagnosis of exclusion.
As the use of new cancer immunotherapeutic drugs increases there will be a growing burden of irAEs, which include vasculitis. In this emerging eld of oncological therapeutics it is the check point inhibitors which are especially liable to induce vasculitis. Powerful efcacy is coupled to the potential for serious side effects and therefore the ability to recognize autoimmune adverse reactions is an important principle in the use of these drugs.
References
Abe K, Itoh M, Asahina A.Rituximab-induced vasculitis:
does the immune complex of rituximab play a key role
in developing paradoxical adverse events? J Dermatol.
2019;46:e311–2. Alloo A, Khosravi H, Granter SR, Jadeja SM, Richardson
PG, Castillo JJ, et al. Ixazomib-induced cutane-
Drug-Induced Vasculitis
https://t.me/medicina_free
179
ous necrotizing vasculitis. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(7):2247–50.
An J, Garje R, Wanat KA, Leone JP. Dabigatran-
related leukocytoclastic vasculitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017:bcr2016217423.
Bock VL, Friedlander M, Waring D, Kossard S, Wood
GK. Cutaneous adverse effects of hormonal adju­vant therapy for breast cancer: a case of localised urticarial vasculitis following anastrozole therapy and a review of the literature. Australas J Dermatol. 2014;55(4):282–5.
Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular
traps: is immunity the second function of chromatin? J Cell Biol. 2012;198:773–83.
Calabrese LH, Calabrese C, Cappelli LC. Rheumatic
immune-related adverse events from cancer immuno­therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2018;14:569–79.
Carmona-Rivera C, Purmalek MM, Moore E, Waldman
M, Walter PJ, Garraffo HM, etal. A role for musca­rinic receptors in neutrophil extracellular trap for­mation and levamisole-induced autoimmunity. JCI Insight. 2017;2(3):e89780.
Chaaya G, Jaller-Char J, Ghaffar E, Castiglioni
A. Rivaroxaban-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis: a challenging rash. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;116(6):577–8.
Daxini A, Cronin K, Sreih AG.Vasculitis associated with
immune checkpoint inhibitors—a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:2579–84.
Dean R, Messer AM, Pickett M, Jahan-Tigh R. A case
of leukocytoclastic vasculitis caused by novel anticoagulant rivaroxaban. Dermatol Online J. 2017;23(11):13030.
Digklia A, Tzika E, Voutsadakis IA. Cutaneous leukocy-
toclastic vasculitis associated with letrozole. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2014;20(2):146–8.
Fekete GL, Fekete L. Cutaneous leukocytoclastic vas-
culitis associated with erlotinib treatment: a case report and review of the literature. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(2):1128–31.
Hamada T, Miyake T, Otsuka M, Iwatsuki K.Warfarin-
induced skin necrosis accompanied by aggravation of vasculitis in a patient with cutaneous arteritis. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(7):779–81.
Hsu CY, Chen WS, Sung SH.Warfarin-induced leukocy-
toclastic vasculitis: a case report and review of litera­ture. Intern Med. 2012;51:601–6.
Kamo H, Shinozaki E, Sugase T, Mizunuma N, Taniguchi
S, Gotoh T, etal. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis with pur­pura and renal failure induced by the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody panitumumab: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2019;13(1):13.
Kaplan MJ, Radic M. Neutrophil extracellular traps:
double-edged swords of innate immunity. J Immunol. 2012;189(6):2689–95.
Kermani TA, Ham EK, Camilleri MJ, Warrington
KJ. Polyarteritis nodosa-like vasculitis in associa­tion with minocycline use: a single-center case series. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;42(2):213–21.
Kostine M, Truchetet M, Schaeverbeke T. Clinical
characteristics of rheumatic syndromes associated
with checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Rheumatology.
2019;58(Suppl 7):vii68–74. Lenert P, Icardi M, Dahmoush L. ANA (+) ANCA
(+) systemic vasculitis associated with the use of
minocycline: case-based review. Clin Rheumatol.
2013;32:1099–106. Lood C, Hughes GC.Neutrophil extracellular traps as a
potential source of autoantigen in cocaine-associated
auto immunity. Rheumatology. 2017;56(4):638–43. Luqmani RA, Bacon PA, Moots RJ, Janssen BA, Pall A,
Emery P, et al. Birmingham vasculitis activity score
(BVAS) in systemic necrotizing vasculitis. QJM.
1994;87(11):671–8. Marquez J, Aguirre L, Muñoz C, Echeverri A, Restrepo
M, Pinto LF. Cocaine-levamisole-induced vasculi-
tis/vasculopathy syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep.
2017;19:36. Mohan N, Edwards ET, Cupps TR, etal. Leukocytoclastic
vasculitis associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha
blocking agents. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(10):1955–8. Moustou AE, Matekovits A, Dessinioti C, Antoniou C,
Skakis PP, Stratigos AJ. Cutaneous side effects of
anti-tumor necrosis factor biologic therapy: a clinical
review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:486–504. Nakazawa D, Tomaru U, Suzuki A, Masuda S, Hasegawa
R, Kobayashi T, et al. Abnormal conformation and
impaired degradation of propylthiouracil-induced
neutrophil extracellular traps: implications of dis-
ordered neutrophil extracellular traps in a rat model
of myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic
antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheum.
2012;64(11):3779–87. Niro A, Recchimurzo N, Sborgia A, Guida M, Alessio
G. Bilateral ischemic retinal vasculitis in metastatic
cutaneous melanoma patient treated with dabrafenib
and trametinib: a case report. Ocul Immunol Inamm.
2018;26:783–5. Ortiz-Sanjuán F, Blanco R, Hernández JL, Pina T,
González-Vela MC, Fernández-Llaca H, et al.
Drug-associated cutaneous vasculitis: study of 239
patients from a single referral center. J Rheumatol.
2014;41(11):2201–7. Peuvrel L, Quereux G, Brocard A, Saint-Jean M, Freour
E, Josselin N, et al. Atypical cutaneous vasculitis
under lapatinib. Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23:540–1. Pieterse E, van der Vlag J. Cracking the pathogen-
esis of cocaine-induced vasculitis. Rheumatology.
2017;56:503–5. Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, Bingham CO, Brogdon
C, Dadu R, etal. Managing toxicities associated with
immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recom-
mendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of
Cancer (SITC) toxicity management working group.
J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95. Radić M, Martinović Kaliterna D, Radić J.Drug-induced
vasculitis: a clinical and pathological review. Neth J
Med. 2012;70:12–7.
180
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Stack
Sainz-Gaspar L, Pita da Veiga G, Suárez-Peñaranda
JM, Vázquez-Veiga H, Sánchez-Aguilar D. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with rivar­oxaban. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57:622–4.
Sakaue S, Sumitomo S, Kubo K, Keishi F, Yamamoto
K.Tocilizumab-induced leucocytoclastic vasculitis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritiss. Rheumatology. 2014;53:1529–30.
Sanchez A, Lozier M, Adkinson BC, Ilaiwy A.C-ANCA
vasculitis after initiation of denosumab. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(3):e228336.
Sehgal R, Stratman EJ, Cutlan JE. Biologic agent-
associated cutaneous adverse events: a single center experience. Clin Med Res. 2018;16(1–2):41–6.
Shibata S, Asano Y, Sato S. Cutaneous polyarteritis
nodosa localized to the arm receiving an infusion of abatacept. Eur J Dermatol. 2013;23:738–9.
Sokumbi O, Wetter DA, Makol A, Warrington
KJ. Vasculitis associated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(8): 739–45.
Sunderkötter CH, Zelger B, Chen KR, Requena L, Piette
W, Carlson JA, etal. Nomenclature of cutaneous vas-
culitis: dermatologic addendum to the 2012 revised
international Chapel Hill consensus conference
nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheumatol.
2018;70(2):171–84. Tomelleri A, Campochiaro C, De Luca G, Cavalli G,
Dagna L. Anti-PD1 therapy-associated cutaneous
leucocytoclastic vasculitis: a case series. Eur J Intern
Med. 2018;57:e11–2. Wall AE, Weaver SM, Litt JS, Rae L. Propylthiouracil-
associated leukocytoclastic necrotizing cutaneous
vasculitis: a case report and review of the literature. J
Burn Care Res. 2017;38(3):e678–85. Woodford RG, Becker GJ, Jain A.Leukocytoclastic vas-
culitis associated with use of aromatase inhibitors.
Intern Med J. 2019;49(9):1162–7. Yates M, Watts RA, Bajema IM, Cid MC, Crestani B,
Hauser T, et al. EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommenda-
tions for the management of ANCA-associated vascu-
litis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1583–94.
Drug-Induced Autoimmune
https://t.me/medicina_free
Bullous Diseases
MichaelBenzaquen, MichaelHertl, andLucaBorradori
Abbreviations
BP Bullous pemphigoid DIBP Drug-induced BP DPP4i Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors EBA Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita IF Immunouorescence LABD Linear IgA bullous dermatosis NSAIDs Nonsteroidal anti-inammatory
drugs
PD1i Programmed cell death protein-1
inhibitors
TNFα Tumor necrosis factor alpha
Autoimmune bullous diseases comprise two major types: intraepidermal blistering diseases such as the pemphigus group of diseases and the subepidermal blistering diseases comprising pemphigoid group of diseases [bullous pemphi-
M. Benzaquen (*) · L. Borradori Department of Dermatology, Inselspital—University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland e-mail: michael.benzaquen@insel.ch;
luca.borradori@insel.ch
M. Hertl Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Marburg, Marburg, Germany e-mail: michael.hertl@uni-marburg.de
goid (BP), linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD), gestational pemphigoid], the group of mucous membrane pemphigoids and epidermol­ysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) (Amber etal. 2018; Di Zenzo etal. 2016; Kim etal. 2016). Besides the immunological process, a variety of medica­tions have been reported as potential triggers in the pathogenesis. The diagnosis of drug-induced autoimmune bullous diseases is challenging; patients are often exposed to several drugs with prolonged latency periods between exposure and onset of the disease. In addition, the epidemio­logical risk of many drugs remains unclear. Nevertheless, recognition and cessation of any suspected drug trigger is essential for the man­agement disease.
1 Drug-Induced Pemphigus
Pemphigus is an autoimmune acquired bullous disease affecting the skin and/or mucous mem­branes, characterised by intraepidermal blister­ing. This condition is associated with Nikolsky’s sign; the direct Nikolsky is when the application of slight pressure on a blister results in extension of the blistering to adjacent skin and the indirect Nikolsky is when rubbing on clinically normal skin causes shearing. This group of diseases is associated with autoantibodies predominantly
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 H. Y. Lee, D. Creamer (eds.), Drug Eruptions, Updates in Clinical Dermatology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09388-3_15
181
182
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Benzaquen et al.
directed against two desmosomal components: desmoglein 1 and/or desmoglein 3 (Amber etal.
2018).
Despite the identication of genetic and envi-
ronmental predisposing factors, various drugs have been repeatedly implicated as potential trig­gers of pemphigus (Kim etal. 2016). The clinical presentation of drug-induced pemphigus is simi­lar to the idiopathic disease. An increasing number of drugs (Brenner and Goldberg 2011) have been reported to induce pemphigus, high­lighting the importance of a detailed clinical his­tory and evaluation in order to identify the potential culprit medication.
1.1 Clinical Features
Drug-induced pemphigus presents with mucocu­taneous erosions and accid vesicles and blisters. It is clinically, histologically and immunologi­cally indistinguishable from the classical disease (Korman etal. 1991; Landau 1997).
1.2 Drug Causality
andPathophysiology
It is postulated that the binding of drugs to cellu­lar proteins induces a structural change or uncov­ers hidden epitopes, thereby stimulating an autoimmune response (Ruocco et al. 1993). Other postulated mechanisms include direct dis­ruption of cell–cell adhesions, cytokine activa­tion and derangements in intracellular calcium (Brenner etal. 1998; Marsden etal. 1976; Newby etal. 2000; Feliciani etal. 2000).
The four main groups of chemical structures
in drugs that have been involved in triggering pemphigus are (1) sulfhydryl radical (thiol drugs or SH drugs), (2) phenolic drugs, (3) drugs with an active amide group and (4) others (Korman etal. 1991).
• Thiol drugs (e.g. penicillamine, captopril or gold sodium thiomalate). Penicillamine was the rst drug reported in 1976 to induce pem­phigus foliaceus. Up to 7% of patients taking
penicillamine for at least 6 months would develop pemphigus (Marsden etal. 1976).
Thiol drugs are postulated to induce acan­tholytic changes in skin through the inhibition of enzymes involved in the aggregation of keratinocytes as well as activating enzymes such as plasminogen activator involved in cell adhesion homeostasis. The activation of plas­minogen activator may contribute to the loss of cell–cell adhesion, as well as to the forma­tion of thiol-cysteine bonds instead of cyste­ine–cysteine bonds, resulting in the formation of neo-antigens with its downstream immuno­logical effects (Ruocco etal. 1993).
• Phenolic drugs, including aspirin, levodopa, rifampicin or heroin, have also been linked to anecdotal cases of drug-triggered pemphigus by the release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin-1α from keratinocytes (Newby etal. 2000). These cytokines are involved in the regulation and synthesis of complement and proteases like plasminogen activator, which are mediators of acantholysis (Feliciani etal. 2000).
• Amide drugs such as acetazolamide was rst identied in 2009, as potential trigger of drug­induced pemphigus (Lo Schiavo etal. 2009).
• Others: Calcium channel blockers, angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or pyrazolone derivatives are some examples of non-thiol non-amide non-phenol drugs that have also been related to some cases of pemphigus. Intracellular cal­cium is essential for keratinocyte homeostasis, cell differentiation, cell–cell adhesion and the proper conformation of the pemphigus anti­gens. It is therefore plausible that calcium channel blockers may under certain circum­stances act as a trigger or aggravating factor (Brenner etal. 1998).
A list of common drug associations with pem-
phigus is summarised in Table 1 (Kaplan et al.
1992; Palleria etal. 2019).
The latency period from drug initiation to the
onset of pemphigus is variable. In cases associ-
Drug-Induced Autoimmune Bullous Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 1 Drugs commonly reported to induce pemphigus
Chemical structure Drug class Drug name Thiol drugs Captopril
Fosinopril Gold sodium thiomalate Penicillamine Thiopronine Pyritinol 5-Thiopyridoxine Mercaptopropionylglycine
Phenolic drugs Levodopa
Phenobarbital Phenytoin Heroin Rifampicin Lysine acetylsalicylate
Progesterone Drug with an active amide group
Non-thiol non-amide non-phenolic drugs
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors
Pyrazalone derivatives Aminophenazone
Antibiotics Ampicillin
Nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs Others
Acetazolamide
Glibenclamide
Indapamide
Cilazapril
Enalapril
Fosinopril
Lisinopril
Benazepril
Quinapril
Ramipril
Noramidopyrine
Azapropazone
Oxyphenylbutazone
Phenylbutazone
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
Penicillin
Isoniazid and ethambutol
Cephalexin
Noroxacin
Ciprooxacin
Piroxicam
Diclofenac
Interleukin-2, interferon-α2a and β
Propranolol
Bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide
Nifedipine
Carbamazepine
Hydroxychloroquine
Tetanus, diphtheria, typhoid, anthrax, and
inuenza vaccinations
183
ated with antibiotics, it typically varies between 2weeks and 2months, whereas in ACE inhibitor/ ARB related and Penicillamine-related cases, the latency is prolonged; occurring between 4 to 24months and 2 to 48months respectively (Saito etal. 2018; Yung and Hambrick 1982).
2 Drug-Induced Bullous
Pemphigoid (DIBP)
BP is an acquired autoimmune disease that affects mainly the elderly and is characterised by subepidermal blistering (Amber et al. 2018).
184
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Benzaquen et al.
More than 50 different drugs have been associ­ated with the onset of BP (Vassileva 1998) and this number will increase with the emergence of new therapies. Two forms of DIBP have been described. The rst one, regarded as a true DIBP, is an acute and self-limited condition with a prompt response after withdrawal of the incrimi­nated drug. The second form, considered as a drug- triggered BP, is characterised by a more chronic and severe course similar to classic BP, in which the medication seems to have a role in the initiation of the disease, which then follows its spontaneous normal course (Lee and Downham 2006).
2.1 Clinical Presentation/ Investigations
Drug-induced BP (DIBP) is characterised by a younger age of onset. The trunk, the limbs (most commonly the lower legs) and the face can be involved and the rash is intensely pruritic. In con­trast to classic BP, it has been observed that the bullae in DIBP tends to occur on normal­appearing skin rather than appearing on erythem­atous or urticarial base (Kawaguchi etal. 2019; Stavropoulos etal. 2014). Erythema multiforme­like target lesions on palms and soles as well as mucosal lesions may be present (Alcalay et al.
1988). Post-bullous erosions heal spontaneously
without scarring. Nevertheless, in the absence of prospective series specically addressing the clinical features of drug-induced cases compared with an adequate control population, there is little evidence supporting the idea that drug-triggered cases can be differentiated entirely on clinical grounds.
Besides subepidermal blisters, histological features often linked to DIBP include intraepi­dermal vesicles and necrotic keratinocytes. A dense dermal inammatory inltrate containing many eosinophils, neutrophils with lymphocytes and histiocytes may be present, as well as throm­bus formation. Similarly to classic BP, IgG anti­bodies and C3 along the linear basement membrane zone are detected in 90% of cases by direct immunouorescence (IF) microscopy,
whereas circulating IgG antibodies are detected in 75% of cases with indirect IF (Stavropoulos etal. 2014).
2.2 Pathophysiology
Several pathomechanisms have been proposed. These include (a) change in T-regulatory cells (CD4+, CD25+, Foxp) resulting in the stimulation of B-cell clones and the release of autoantibodies against the basement membrane zone (Bowman and Delrieu 2009), (b) molecular mimicry arising from structural similarity between drugs and auto­antigens leading to the activation of CD4+ T cells and the initiation of the autoimmune cascade in susceptible individuals (Bowman and Delrieu
2009), (c) drugs acting as antigenic haptens, bind-
ing and modifying protein molecules in the base­ment membrane, resulting in the exposure of hidden antigenic sites (Lee and Downham 2006).
In a retrospective study comprising 34 patients, Patsatsi et al. (2009) described an increased detection rate with a signicant higher level of anti-BP180 autoantibodies in a group of patients with BP receiving systemic medications prior to the disease, compared with a group of patients who did not receive any medications.
2.3 Drug Causality
Since the rst report of salicylazosulphapyridine­induced BP in 1970 (Bean et al. 1970), many other drugs have been reported to induce or trig­ger BP (detailed in Table2).
In a case–control study assessing the drugs used on a long-term basis prior to onset of BP, it was found that two classes of drugs, diuretics and neuroleptics, were used more frequently by BP patients than by control subjects. Among diuret­ics, the risk was linked to aldosterone antagonists (Bastuji-Garin etal. 2011). In a UK case–control study, loop diuretics were used signicantly more frequently by the BP patients (Lloyd-Lavery etal. 2013). Antibiotics, antiarrhythmics, antihy­pertensives, NSAIDs, and TNFα inhibitors have also been incriminated (Vassileva 1998).
Drug-Induced Autoimmune Bullous Diseases
https://t.me/medicina_free
185
Drugs commonly reported to induce bullous
Table 2
pemphigoid
Drug class Drug name Antibiotics Actinomycin
Antiarrythmics­antihypertensives
Diuretics Furosemide
Neuroleptics Risperidone
Salicylates Aspirin
Nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs
DPP4 inhibitors Vildagliptin
Antirheumatics D-penicillamine
TNFα inhibitors
PD1 inhibitors Nivolumab
Vaccines Inuenza
Amoxicillin Ampicillin Cephalexin Ciprooxacin Chloroquine Dactinomycin Levooxacin Penicillin Rifampicin
Calcium channel-blockers: Amlodipine; Nifedipine
Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: Captopril; Enalapril;
Lisinopril Beta-blockers: Nadolol; Practolol Angiotensin II antagonists: Losartan
Spironolactone
Flupentixol Gabapentin Levetiracetam
Sulfasalazine Salicylazosulphapyridine Azapropazone Diclofenac (topical) Ibuprofen Mefenamic acid Phenacetin
Sitagliptin Linagliptin
Tiobutarit Tiopronin Adalimumab Efalizumab Etanercept
Pembrolizumab
Swine u Tetanus toxoid HZV Hexavalent combined Vaccines
Table 2 (continued)
Drug class Drug name Others Arsenic
Clonidine Erlotinib Galantamine hydrobromide Fluoxetine Gold thiosulphate Interleukin-2 Methyldopa Terbinane Tolbutamide Omeprazole Psoralens with UVA Placental extracts Potassium iodide Sulphonamide
DPP4 dipeptidyl peptidase-IV, TNFα tumour necrosis factor alpha, PD1 programmed cell death protein-1
Recently, two classes of drugs have been shown to have increased epidemiological risk: Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (DPP4i), and programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors (PD1i).
DPP4i are oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs administered to patients with type 2 diabetes. An increasing number of reports have suggested that DPP4i could trigger BP.García etal. (2016) iden­tied 170 cases of BP in patients under DPP4i in the EudraVigilance database, suggesting that the intake of DPP4i was more frequently associated with the development of BP when compared to that of other drugs. In this latter report, a high disproportionality for vildagliptin was found. A French case–non-case study recording all sponta­neous reports of DPP4i-related BP in the National Pharmacovigilance Database also provided evi­dence for a strong signal for an increased risk of BP associated to DPP4i exposure, especially vildagliptin (Béné etal. 2016). Finally, Benzaquen etal. (2018) conrmed for the rst time in a ret­rospective study that DPP4i were associated with an increased risk of developing BP. Association with vildagliptin was signicantly higher com­pared to that with other DPP4i with an adjusted odds-ratio of 3.57.
186
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Benzaquen et al.
Immune check point inhibitors which are increasingly used in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and other metastatic cancers, repre­sent another class of drugs increasingly incrimi­nated as a trigger of immune-mediated dermatoses such as vitiligo, lichenoid eruptions and autoim­mune blistering diseases. Twenty-two cases of BP associated with PD1i (nivolumab or pembro­lizumab) have been reported so far in the litera­ture (Lopez and Geskin 2018). Dysregulation of PD1 pathway can impair peripheral tolerance and alter the balance within the immune system, lead­ing to the development of off-target effects and autoimmunity. With the anticipated signicant growth in the number of patients eligible to receive checkpoint inhibitors, physicians should be aware of these additional cutaneous autoim­mune association with BP.
3 Drug-Induced Linear IgA
Bullous Dermatosis (LABD)
LABD comprises a heterogeneous group of auto­immune subepidermal blistering disorder charac­terised by the detection of linear deposits of IgA (alone or as the predominant immunoreactant in combination with other immunoglobulins) along the basement membrane zone as detected by direct IF microscopy studies. Immunologically, the detected IgA autoantibodies may demonstrate reactivity with various antigens, including spe­cic antigenic regions of the extracellular domain of BP180, as well as BP230 and type VII colla­gen (Amber et al. 2018). It is estimated that at least 2% of all LABD is attributed to drug admin­istration (Horiguchi etal. 2008).
3.1 Clinical Presentation
The lesions in LABD often exhibit annular and polycyclic patterns with vesicles and bullae aris­ing on the edge with central crusting or healing. These so-called cluster of jewels or string of pearls signs are characteristic for LABD, espe­cially in the childhood form (Horiguchi et al.
2008). In contrast, drug-induced LABD may
present with more polymorphic and/or atypical
features mimicking other forms of bullous der­matosis, severe drug eruptions, vasculitis or even neutrophilic dermatoses (Dietrich et al. 2012). Chanal et al. (2013) performed a retrospective single-centre cohort study of 28 patients diag­nosed with LABD between 1995 and 2010: 16 patients with spontaneous LABD and 12 with drug-induced LABD. Nikolsky sign and large erosions were signicantly more frequent in drug-induced than spontaneous LABD, with no between-group differences for erythematous plaques, target or target-like lesions, string of pearls, location, mucosal involvement or histo­logical features. Hence, drug-induced LABD appear to be more severe than the spontaneous form. Physicians should be aware of this diagno­sis and perform a direct IF in case of lesions mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis.
3.2 Pathophysiology
The mechanism of drug-induced autoimmunity in LABD is not clear. However, it has been shown that in patients with vancomycin-induced LABD, IgA reactivity to collagen VII is acquired in the presence of vancomycin (Yamagami etal. 2018).
3.3 Drug Causality
The latency between drug initiation and onset of disease ranges between 2days to 4weeks. A vari­ety of medications have been implicated with vancomycin being the most frequently cited (Baden et al. 1988; Whitworth et al. 1996). Vancomycin-associated LABD has also been reported following exposure to vancomycin­impregnated cement spacers used in knee arthro­plasty (Riemenschneider et al. 2018). Several other drugs have also been associated with LABD, including NSAIDs (piroxicam, naproxen, diclofenac) (Bouldin etal. 2000; Plunkett etal.
2001), amiodarone (Primka etal. 1994), antibiot-
ics (ceftriaxone, penicillin) (Combemale et al.
1993; Yawalkar etal. 1999) and acetaminophen
(Avci etal. 2003). Recently, Garel etal. have col­lected, in a French retrospective study from 1985 to 2017, 69 cases of drug-induced LABD. 29