Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4538_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
26 Мб
Скачать
368
https://t.me/medicina_free
52. Seet E, Chung F. Management of sleep apnea in adults - functional algorithms for the perioperative period: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth. 2010;57:849–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630- 010- 9344- y.
53. Ebert TJ, Perez F, Uhrich TD, Deshur MA. Desurane-mediated sympathetic activation occurs in humans despite preventing hypotension and baroreceptor unloading. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1227–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542- 199805000- 00013.
54. Singh M, Liao P, Kobah S, etal. Proportion of surgical patients with undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110:629–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes465.
55. Florea D, Matei AF.Riesgos anestésicos en los pacientes con apnea obstructiva del sueño. Rev Chil Anest. 2019;48:13–9.
56. Gupta RM, Parvizi J, Hanssen AD, Gay PC. Postoperative complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome undergoing hip or knee replacement: a case-control study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:897–905. https://doi.org/10.4065/76.9.897.
57. Secretaría de Salud Norma Ocial Mexicana NOM-026-SSA3–2012, Para la Practica De La Cirugia Mayor Ambulatoria Prefacio.
58. Joshi GP, Ankichetty SP, Gan TJ, Chung F. Society for ambulatory anesthesia consensus statement on preoperative selection of adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea sched­uled for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1060–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/
ANE.0b013e318269cfd7.
A. A. Valadez et al.
Radiological Diagnosis inOSA
https://t.me/medicina_free
21
VijayaKrishnanParamasivan, SrinivasKishore, VikasAgrawal, andMohanKameswaran
21.1 Introduction
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent partial or complete upper airway obstruction occurring at the level of the pharynx during sleep [1]. OSA is diagnosed by polysomnography, and the level of obstruction is identied by radiological imaging and sleep endoscopy. Both the investigations are essential in evaluating and managing patients with OSAS.
Multiple soft-tissue structures surround the pharynx, and these are encased by the maxillofacial skeleton and the cervical spine. An increase in bulk of the soft tis­sues and decrease in size of the maxillofacial skeleton are the anatomical causes of constriction of the upper airway which can be evaluated radiologically.
Lateral cephalometry and sleep MRI are investigations to diagnose the level and pattern of obstruction that are commonly done. Lateral cephalometry and computed tomography of the airway are static airway evaluations, whereas Cine MRI will give pathophysiological changes that happen to the airway during sleep. However, ultra­sonogram of the airway is still not a commonly used method as it is a little difcult to assess during sleep. Both CT and MRI can provide an excellent evaluation of the
V. K. Paramasivan (*) Department of Snoring and Sleep Disorders, Madras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Kishore AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
V. Agrawal Speciality ENT hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India e-mail: doctor@enthospital.com
M. Kameswaran Madras ENT Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 P. M. Baptista et al. (eds.), Obstructive Sleep Apnea,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35225-6_21
369
370
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. K. Paramasivan et al.
various anatomical planes of the site of obstruction, which helps better clinical assessment and better planning for a possible surgical approach.
These procedures have established themselves as an essential supporting assess­ment tools in the clinical diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, and posttreatment fol­low- up of patients who do not respond well to initial therapy. However, each technique has limitations, and no gold-standard method has been established until now. Therefore, a validated investigation capable of identifying the obstruction site accurately during sleep enables appropriate patient selection for surgery and other treatment modalities with an improvement in treatment outcomes.
21.2 X-ray Nasopharynx
X-ray nasopharynx or lateral radiograph of the neck is a basic commonly done investigation to evaluate adenoidal enlargement in children. It gives a measure of the absolute size of the adenoids and an assessment of its relation to the size of the airway. The size of the adenoids is graded according to the palatal airway measured from the most convex point of the adenoid tissue (A1) to the soft palate (A2) (Fig.21.1). The narrowest distance between the nasopharyngeal soft tissues and the soft palate was taken [2].
In Fig.21.1, we have marked the skull base as a line connecting b1 and b2. The line connecting A and A1 is the most convex point of adenoidal tissue. The distance between A1 and A2 is the posterior airway space. Accordingly, it has been graded from 1 to 3. Grade 1: >6mm, Grade 2: 4–6mm, Grade 3: 0–3mm (Fig.21.2). Grade 0 is considered as post adenoidectomy. Lateral skull radiograph is a noninvasive procedure that is well tolerated by children, unlike a exible beroptic scope. It is still a useful tool in practice.
Fig. 21.1 X-ray nasopharynx showing the distance between A1 and A2, which is the posterior airway space between adenoid and soft palate
21 Radiological Diagnosis inOSA
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 21.2 X-ray nasopharynx showing 0–3 grades of adenoidal hypertrophy causing airway obstruction
371
21.3 Lateral Cephalometry
The standard method of assessment of the skeletal relationship is dened from mea­surements derived from a lateral cephalometric radiograph. Similar information is given by a midline reconstruction from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT). A small maxilla and mandible are associated with oropharyngeal crowding and predisposition to OSA, as is a high arched palate. Skeletal factors are a more signicant factor in children and non­obese adults.
Lateral cephalography helps analyze skeletal and soft-tissue characteristics of patients with OSA and is available in most dental clinics, easy to perform, and less expensive [3, 4]. Moreover, a tendency toward a shorter dimension of the cranial base and maxillary length, maxillomandibular retrognathia, and increased anterior lower facial height and mandibular plane angle have been reported [57]. Figure21.3 shows various bony landmarks and measurements.
The position of the hyoid bone with reference to the inferior mandibular border (mandibular plane: MP) can be obtained from the same radiograph or reconstruc­tion; multiple studies have conrmed that an inferiorly situated hyoid bone corre­lates closely with an increased length of the oropharynx and both measurements are proportional to the severity of OSA [8, 9].
It provides information for anteroposterior but not lateral pharyngeal structures implicated in the pharyngeal narrowing which is considered one of the major disad­vantages. It doesn’t show the dynamic airway collapse during sleep.
Lateral cephalometry serves as an important tool in the clinical diagnosis of OSA patients demonstrating distinct craniofacial morphological changes. Thereby gives a clue to the site of obstruction, based on specic skeletal and soft-tissue compo­nents and helping in skeletal framework surgical planning.
372
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 21.3 Lateral cephalometry
21.4 Cone-Beam CT Analysis
V. K. Paramasivan et al.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a commonly used three-dimensional imaging technique introduced to dentistry in 1998 [10]. The most signicant advan­tage is that CBCT can acquire quality images at a radiation dose equivalent to approximately one-half of the dose associated with conventional two-dimensional imaging.
Although 2-dimensional imaging is of great value, the complex shape of the airway is not evaluated except with 3-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques [11].
Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging are powerful 3D imaging tools. However, radiation is an issue with CT scans and the limitations with MRI in terms of availability and compliance dictate the search for more alternatives.
Cone-beam CT ts this gap perfectly due to its advantage in short scanning time (10–70s), and there is a relatively low dose of radiation compared with con­ventional CT [12]. When utilizing a large eld of view (FOV) protocol, the upper airway is visible within the CBCT volume and, thus, CBCT is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of the airway. Using CBCT, Enciso and colleagues, found that the presence and severity of OSA are associated with a narrow lateral dimen­sion of the airway [13]. Mayer and colleagues reported a decrease in the trans­verse width of the oropharynx in OSA subjects [14]. Despite the low soft-tissue resolution, CBCT shows high contrast between bone, empty spaces, and soft tis­sues, allowing the airway to be visualized ideally in relation to the hard-tissue structures of the skull.
21 Radiological Diagnosis inOSA
https://t.me/medicina_free
373
21.5 Radiographic Analysis
The CBCT images were exported as DICOM (.dcm) les and then imported into the software program for analyzing. The upper airway affected by OSA is frequently dened as the soft-tissue region bounded by the nasopharynx superiorly and the epiglottis inferiorly. Therefore, the images of the oropharynx from the hard palate to epiglottis were isolated from the data for analysis by using manual segmentation of each axial slice from the surrounding soft tissue with thresholding or setting the upper and lower gray level values of the area of interest (upper airway). Once the airway was isolated, the software computed the area (mm2) and volume (mm3) of each axial slice for the entire isolated portion of the airway (Fig.21.4). These area and volume measurements were used to identify the smallest axial slice, and width and anterior–posterior (A–P) dimension measurements were then carried out on the smallest axial slice in each CBCT study. The average of multiple measurements was recorded as the value representing the width and AP dimension. All linear measure­ments were acquired by the same individual. The total number of axial slices seg­mented from the hard palate to the epiglottis was used to calculate the airway length. The A–P distance and the width of the minimum surface area of the oropharynx are commonly used to evaluate the upper airway [15].
The volumetric analysis of the airway can also be done while asking the patient to perform Muller’s maneuver (Fig.21.5). A recent systematic review revealed that the most common measurements of the airway used to evaluate OSA subjects with CBCT included total volume and minimum cross-sectional area, followed by area and lateral and anterior–posterior linear measurements [16]. A study conducted by Camacho and colleagues was the rst to compare airway morphology between upright and supine patient positions using CBCT.They found that the minimum
Fig. 21.4 CT airway volumetric analysis from nasal cavity to hypopharynx
374
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 21.5 CT airway volumetric analysis during Muller’s maneuver
cross-sectional area decreased from 124±29 to 30±5mm2 when the patient was scanned in the supine position [17]. Finally, the average area and volume assess­ment of the total mean airway volume is made.
V. K. Paramasivan et al.
21.6 Role ofCBCT inSurgical Planning
Specic software analyzed raw DICOM data from CBCT scanning including linear and volume and the smallest cross-sectional area where assessments are made. CBCT was performed at both ends of expiration and inspiration, which helped in the accurate determination of the level of collapse. Subsequently, this could change the surgical decision, especially in retroglossal collapse patients. CBCT is consid­ered a low dose, a highly efcient diagnostic tool essential in conjunction with a clinical assessment to evaluate OSA, especially in severe cases properly [18].
21.6.1 Dynamic MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway during sleep is also termed sleep MRI, Cine MRI, or Dynamic MRI. It can detect the level, degree, and cause of obstruction in the upper airway, which helps the clinical diagnosis and treatment. This noninvasive imaging is used to identify the site of upper airway obstruction for the prediction of treatment outcomes and monitoring and follow-up of patients with OSAS after therapy. In addition, MRI of the airway with cine sequence is
21 Radiological Diagnosis inOSA
https://t.me/medicina_free
considered an excellent alternative method to examine dynamic upper airway con­ditions during sleep [1921]. MRI sleep studies are noninvasive and allow dynamic abnormalities of the entire airway to be assessed at once.
375
21.6.2 Anatomical Subdivision ofUpper Airway
The upper airway is divided into nasopharynx, velopharynx, oropharynx, and hypo­pharynx. The nasopharynx is the region between the skull base, and the horizontal imaginary line from the tip of the post nasal spine of the hard palate. Velopharynx is the region between the postnasal spine and the tip of the soft palate. The oropharynx is the region between the tip of the soft palate and the tip of the epiglottis. Hypopharynx is the region between the tip of the epiglottis and the level of the glottis.
21.6.3 Dynamic Sleep MRI Technique
In this dynamic sleep MRI, midsagittal and axial sequential T1-weighted (repetition time, 650 milliseconds; echo time, 14 milliseconds) and T2-weighted (repetition time, 6000 milliseconds; echo time, 90 milliseconds) images with 3-mm slice thick­ness will be taken. The sagittal planes are obtained from the midline laterally, and the axial planes are obtained from the skull base to the larynx. Patients will be in a supine position with the neck in a neutral position and they are instructed to refrain from swallowing during scanning and to breathe through their nose with their mouth closed. Then the patient will be asked to sleep and then the images will be acquired once the patient starts snoring and apnea happens. The image analysis is done on a workstation with the determination of the level and cause of obstruction. Two­dimensional distances and diameters of the upper airway or its related structures are measured. We can evaluate the volumes of the soft-tissue structures such as the tongue, the soft palate, or the pharyngeal walls or the remaining compromised or noncompromised airway spaces. We can also obtain 3-dimensional data, volumes based on cross-sectional areas, and slice thickness by various computerized models [22, 23].
Dynamic MR imaging can obtain rapid images (1 image per second) that are temporally spaced a short time apart. It can show the dynamic motion of the upper airway, thereby allowing visualization of the changing shape and conguration of the airway during respiration and evaluation of the relationship between the soft tissue of the upper airway such as adenoid, palatine tonsils, and soft palate and the degree of airway collapse [24, 25].
Dynamic MR obtained during a normal sleeping state shows the patent naso­pharynx and retroglossal airway with minimal airway motion. The degree of move­ment of the retroglossal airway is less than 5mm. Dynamic MR in OSAS patients shows complete airway collapse at the level of the soft palate and base of the tongue
376
https://t.me/medicina_free
during apneic events. Sedation is usually not recommended in these studies, espe­cially in adults as it carries the risk of prolonged airway obstruction. It can be used in children to simulate natural sleep.
Recently, a real-time MR imaging platform for synchronous, multiplanar visual­ization of upper airway collapse in OSAS at 3 Tesla can be performed to promote natural sleep, with an emphasis on lateral pharyngeal wall visualization [26].
V. K. Paramasivan et al.
21.6.4 Dynamic Sleep MRI inDiagnosing OSAS
Current theories on OSAS pathogenesis involve a combination of abnormal anat­omy of the pharynx and the physiology of the upper airway dilator muscles. Anatomical changes in OSAS include decreased anteroposterior, lateral, cross­sectional, and volumetric measurements at different pharyngeal levels. In addition, dynamic sleep MRI helps to identify the level, pattern, degree, and cause of upper airway obstruction.
21.6.5 Level ofAirway Obstruction
Retropalatal and retroglossal level of obstruction is the most typical site of upper airway obstruction. Identifying the level of obstruction is crucial in deciding treat­ment planning and single or multilevel surgery.
21.6.6 Degree ofAirway Obstruction
Measuring the anteroposterior and transverse diameters and cross-sectional area and volumetric assessment of the airway and soft-tissue structures can help deter­mine of the degree of airway obstruction in patients with OSAS.The measured soft tissues are adenoid tonsils, lingual tonsils, palatine tonsils, soft palate, tongue, lat­eral pharyngeal wall, and fat pad area. The measurement is usually done at the larg­est section of the soft tissue and the most narrowed section of the airway. The cross-sectional area of the soft tissues and the airway at different levels is calcu­lated. Measurement of the upper airway revealed enlarged soft-tissue structures and narrowed pharyngeal airway in patients with OSA.The values are calculated and compared when the patient is awake and while sleeping and snoring.
21.6.7 Advantage andLimitations
Magnetic resonance imaging provides an image with excellent contrast of the soft­tissue structures in patients with OSA.A fast MR imaging can show the anatomical obstruction dynamically during apnea. Magnetic resonance imaging does not
21 Radiological Diagnosis inOSA
https://t.me/medicina_free
377
Fig. 21.6 Dynamic MRI sagittal view of OSAS patient showing different pattern of palate, (a) tunnel shaped soft palate, (b) funnel shaped soft palate, (c) long hard palate with very short soft palate
a
b
c
expose patients to ionizing radiation, and allowing imaging in multiple planes. The major limitations of MR imaging are as follows: long examination time, noisy scan­ning, claustrophobic effects experienced by many people while in the gantry tube, and high cost. The lack of a comfortable sleep environment also limits the ability to use MR imaging during sleep [27, 28].
The major advantages of dynamic MRI compared to drug-induced sleep endos­copy are easy differentiation of primary from secondary soft palate collapse and identication of various patterns of soft palate such as tunnel or funnel-shaped soft palate and also the length of the hard and soft palate (Fig.21.6). If the soft palate is very short, any soft-tissue surgery may not improve the surgical outcome. For a long hard palate, bony framework surgery like transpalatal advancement pharyngoplasty can be planned.