Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5595_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
412 Chapter 16 Epilepsy
GABA
GLUTAMATE
Box 16.1
Accelerators and brakes in the brain: the molecular substrates of epilepsy
Glutamate, acting on its ion-channel receptors, is the main excitatory inuence keeping brain activity going (the accelerator pedal). Balancing this is -aminobutyric acid (GABA), the major brake in the brain. Interestingly, these two compounds are closely related structurally—glutamate is an amino acid with two carboxylic acid (–COOH) groups, and GABA is formed when one of these is removed by a specic enzyme, glutamic acid decarboxylase.
Some of the interconversions between these two key brain amino acid neurotransmitters are shown in Figure a. GABA breakdown by GABA-transaminase, and GABA removal from the synapse by uptake into nerve terminals and glial cells by the GABA transporter GAT-1 are both targets for AEDs (e.g. tiagabine). ere is also a suggestion that steps in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (Krebs cycle) are aected by AEDs. For example, sodium valproate reportedly inhibits succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase. e relevance of this to the therapeutic response is, however, speculative.
Glutamate receptors can be divided into four categories: the three subtypes of ionotropic receptors and the family of metabotropic receptors. We are only concerned here with ionotropic receptors.
Ionotropic receptors (ligand-gated ion channels) have receptor and channel moieties which are part of the same protein. is protein entity is composed of several transmembrane subunits which together form mono- or heteromultimeric structures. Other examples of ionotropic receptors are GABAA (see below), and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (see Chapter 2).
Ionotropic glutamate receptors are subdivided into NMDA, AMPA, and kainate receptors. e ion channel is opened when glutamate binds to the receptor­binding site (i.e. the channels are ligand gated). Other conditions may also be required. For example, glycine acts as a co-transmitter with glutamate at the NMDA receptor illustrated in Figure b—both glycine and glutamate must bind to their separate sites on the
The brake
COOH
CH
The GAT-1 transporter
Figure a Glutamate and GABA are very closely related.
removed by
NH
2
GABA-transaminase
Succinic semialdehyde
Succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase
CH
CH
Glutamic acid
decarboxylase
2
2
2
Succinate
The accelerator
NH
α-ketoglutarate
Tricarboxylic acid
2
cycle
COOH
CH
2
CH
2
CH
COOH
removed by
Excitatory
amino acid
transporters
16.2 The biological basis of epilepsy: brakes and accelerators 413
Glycine GABA
BenzodiazepineGlutamate
Box 16.1 Accelerators and brakes in the brain: the molecular substrates of epilepsy
receptor for the channel to open. It should also be noted that this requirement for glycine binding has been exploited in the development of new antipsychotic drugs, as discussed in Chapter 18, Box
18.2. In this novel strategy for antipsychotic medication the objective is to increase activity at NMDA receptors. is is in contrast with antiepileptic therapy, where the aim is to decrease the inuence of glutamate relative to GABA.
All ionotropic glutamate receptors have integral ion channels for Na+ and/or Ca2+ which upon opening allow the ions to enter along their concentration gradients to depolarize the cell. e ionotropic glutamate receptors are widespread, and so glutamate has a major excitatory role in the brain.
GABA receptors GABAA receptors are also ionotropic, but in this case the ion channel is permeable to Cl–, which enters the cell to cause hyperpolarization of the cell membrane. GABAB receptors are 7-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (see Chapter 2), and are coupled through Gi to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, thereby lowering
intracellular cyclic AMP levels. e GABAB receptors are found at pre-synaptic sites (decreasing release of GABA and other neurotransmitters), and also post-synaptically (leading indirectly to an increase in K+ permeability and a dampening down of excitability). erefore GABA action is always inhibitory. GABA receptors, like those for glutamate, are widespread within the brain.
at the correct level of activity at GABA receptors in the brain is essential to prevent seizure activity is not in doubt. is is shown by the following observations.
• Administration of the GABAA antagonists picrotoxin
and biculline cause seizures.
• Knockout mice which are missing the gene
encoding one of the GABAB subunits (GABAB1) show major epileptic activity.
In addition to binding GABA, these receptors also have binding sites for benzodiazepines, which act as allosteric regulators making it easier for GABA to bind. Benzodiazepines thereby enhance the inhibitory eect of GABA.
+
Na
2+
Ca
Outside cell
Cell
membrane
Inside cell
The NMDA glutamate receptor
• Open channel allows
+
and Ca2+ into cell
Na
• Cell becomes depolarized
—excitatory
Figure b Glutamate NMDA receptors and GABAA receptors are similar in many respects, but
have opposite effects on neuronal excitability.
Opened by
glutamate
binding
GATE
Opened
by GABA
binding
Cl
The GABA for GABA
• Open channel allows Cl
• Cell becomes hyperpolarized
inhibitory
receptor
A
into cell
414 Chapter 16 Epilepsy
Seizure activity
Normal
Glutamate GABA
Drug therapy
Increases GABA
Decreases glutamate
Figure 16.2 Imbalance between the activity of glutamate and
GABA in the brain results in unrestrained excitatory influence of glutamate (i.e. weighing down the seesaw).
Drugs may restore the balance by increasing the GABA influence (e.g. tiagabine, vigabatrin, and benzodiazepines) or reducing glutamate activity (e.g. topiramate and sodium valproate). Note that many AEDs mix such actions with others. For example, topiramate both increases the GABA influence and blocks sodium channels. Blocking voltage-sensitive sodium channels and/or calcium channels is common to many AEDs, and this may itself reduce release of neurotransmitters, particularly glutamate, thus indirectly reducing the neurotransmitter’s influence.
concentration gradient. e two eects of this inux of Ca2+ are:
• a contribution to depolarization and therefore action
potential ring
• the exocytotic release of neurotransmitters, including
glutamate, at nerve terminals, and thus stimulation of adjoining cells in the neural network.
ere are a number of dierent types of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, namely L-, N-, P/Q-, R-, and T-types; this is important to us because dierent AEDs interact with dierent types of Ca2+ channel. T-type channels have a number of subtypes, and serve a range of neuronal functions. ey open in response to very small depolarizations (e.g. to –60 mV), which do not cause other Ca2+ channel subtypes to open. T-type channel activation is particularly associated with the early initiation of bursting activity in neurons. e other Ca2+ channel types (L-, N-, P/Q-, and R-types) open only with larger depolarizations (e.g. to around –40 mV), and are more closely associated with Ca2+ entry at nerve terminals, and therefore with neurotransmitter release.
GABA
Glutamate
are AEDs. L-type channel inhibition is, however, considered to be one of the mechanisms of action of some AEDs (see below). is means that either L-type channel inhibition is not connected with the way these AEDs work, or it only contributes to the antiepileptic eect when it occurs in combination with other mechanisms of action.
16.2.5 The biological basis of epilepsy:
do we have a GABA hypothesis?
When a biological theory is proposed for a complex disorder it may be considered useful even if we know it does not encompass all, or even most, aspects of the disorder. is is true, for example, of the dopamine hypothesis for schizophrenia, which, as we shall see in Chapter 18, has been useful in understanding drug action, despite its limitations. We can therefore consider a simple GABA hypothesis for epilepsy. Hypothesis: Epilepsy is caused by a global or regional inadequacy in GABA inuence on brain function, due to either decient GABA inuence, or elevated glutamate inuence.
We have encountered some of these channels before, notably L-type Ca2+ channels, when considering the cardiovascular system in Chapter 7. You may recall that there are many clinically available L-type channel blockers, and it is instructive to note that none of these
is hypothesis, either explicitly stated or assumed, has driven much drug discovery, resulting in new AEDs which benet many patients, and can therefore be considered a useful starting point when thinking about the biological basis of epilepsy.
16.2 The biological basis of epilepsy: brakes and accelerators 415
Box 16.2
The use-dependent Na+ channel-blocking action of some antiepilepsy drugs
40
+
channels
Na
open—Na
enters cell—
0
potential res
–40
–70
Figure c A typical neuronal action potential.
The opening of voltage-sensitive Na+ channels is central to action potential generation. In a resting cell, there is a membrane potential across the plasma membrane such that the inside of the cell is negative relative to the outside. When Na+ enters and the cell is depolarized, this potential is reversed and the inside becomes transiently positive before it returns to being negative as the resting state is restored.
action
+
Na
channels
resting
+
Threshold
1—5 msec
Figure c illustrates the involvement of voltage­sensitive Na+ channels in the action potential. When the cell is resting, the channels are in their closed state. As the membrane polarity is raised from its baseline of –70 mV (or below) to about –40 mV (their ‘threshold’), the resting channels open and Na+ enters the cell as the action potential is red. e channels then close, but at this point they remain, transiently, in a refractory state, when they cannot be opened.
A use-dependent Na+ channel-blocking AED binds preferentially to this refractory state. Figure d shows action potentials ring at very high frequency, as may occur in neurons during an epileptic seizure. e
+
channels close and for a
Na short time are refractory—i.e.
they cannot be opened
+
channels then return to the
Na
resting state—available for opening when the membrane polarity is raised to threshold
+
Reminder: Na the membrane is at its resting potential (around –70 mV). As the potential is raised the channels will open. The potential at which this occurs (~ –40 mV) is threshold—the channels ip open, Na rushes in, and the action potential is red.
channels are closed when
introduction of an AED (red bar) delays the return of refractory channels to the resting state, so delaying the availability of sucient Na+ channels to support the high ring rate. Consequently the rate of ring falls.
However, when the cell is ring at a normal rate to begin with (bottom panel) there is sucient time for the channels to return to the resting state even with the delay imposed by the drug, and so there is no eect on ring rate. Consequently, a use-dependent drug will not interfere with normal patterns of neuronal activity in the brain, but will reduce the rate of action potential generation in neurons ring at abnormally high frequency.
+
416 Chapter 16 Epilepsy
Membrane polarity: –70 mV –40 mV +40 mV
Box 16.2 The use-dependent Na+channel-blocking action of some antiepilepsy drugs
Resting Open Refractory
+
channel-blocking AED
Na
Na+ channel-blocking AED
Figure d Some AEDs selectively bind to the refractory state of the voltage-
sensitive Na+ channels.
Upon closing, the channels transiently enter a refractory state—they are closed, but are unable to be opened even if the membrane is depolarized. Use-dependent Na+ channel blockers selectively target these refractory channels, binding to them and ‘delaying’ the channels in this state. This shift in equilibrium will have most effect on rapidly firing neurons (upper trace), without affecting slowly firing neurons (lower trace). In this latter case, even with the ‘delay’ there is sufficient time for the refractory channels to return to the resting state (available for opening) before their involvement is required again in generating an action potential. There is therefore no effect on the frequency of these action potentials.

16.3 Three mechanisms in the drug treatment of epilepsy

e objective of therapy with AEDs is to prevent the occurrence of seizures while minimizing unwanted eects. e target in this area of clinical pharmacology is clear and simple—the elimination of seizures. At the end of this section we discuss the strategy in treating epilepsy, noting that the goal is to achieve this target with just one drug, while recognizing that this is not always possible. e issue of unwanted eects and drug interactions is
serious with AEDs, and one reason for striving to use only one drug is to minimize these. Monotherapy is also likely to improve compliance, another important consideration with AED use.
AEDs are a frustrating subject for those seeking a rational science-based understanding of prescribing. e action of drugs is complex, involving many dierent cellular
16.3 Three mechanisms in the drug treatment of epilepsy 417
mechanisms, often combined in one drug. It is perhaps the multiple cellular sites of actions that are essential for an eective clinical response. Consequently, in the development of new AEDs the best strategy for drug companies is probably not to seek agents with a single molecular target.
Furthermore, the mechanism of action of AEDs responsible for the clinical eect is sometimes unknown. is is true of both newer drugs and the older, rst­generation drugs. Despite these issues we can introduce some of the known actions of AEDs by considering three broad types of cellular mechanism:
• decreasing sustained high frequency ring of action
potentials
• increasing GABA inuence
• blocking T-type Ca2+ channels.
16.3.1 Decreasing sustained high
frequency firing of action potentials
As described above, epileptic activity is characterized by the very high frequency of action potentials in neurons within the aected regions. ree actions of AEDs target these rapidly-ring neurons.
• Delaying recovery of Na+ channels by selective binding
to the refractory state has been referred to in Section
16.2.3, and is explored further in Box 16.2. e objective is to damp down the activity of the rapidly ring neurons, while leaving normal activity unaected.
• Antagonist action at AMPA and NMDA glutamate
receptors reduces the propagation of excitability through the neural network.
• Blocking L-, N-, P/Q-, and R-type voltage-sensitive
Ca2+ channels may reduce the excitability of neurons and the release of neurotransmitters, including glutamate. Note that blocking T-type Ca2+ channels is discussed as a separate mechanism of action (Section
16.3.3).
AEDs acting in these various ways to reduce high frequency neuronal discharges include carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, topiramate, and possibly sodium valproate.
16.3.2 Increasing GABA influence
From an experimental point of view it is of interest to note that the convulsant drugs picrotoxin and
bicuculline have their eect by blocking GABAA receptors, downregulating the inhibitory GABA inuence on neuronal excitability. Such drugs do not have a clinical use. Perhaps not surprisingly, then, drugs that enhance the GABA inuence are often anticonvulsant. Two mechanisms for raising the GABA inuence can be identied.
1. Increasing GABA levels in the synapse. is is achieved by AEDs in at least two ways:
a) inhibiting uptake from the synapse by blocking the
GABA transporter, GAT-1
b) reducing GABA breakdown by inhibiting GABA
transaminase (see Box 16.1, Figure a).
2. Enhancing the function of GABA receptors. For example, benzodiazepines act on a binding site in the GABAA receptor (see Box 16.1, Figure b) to allosterically modulate GABA binding, making binding easier.
e consequences of these two interventions are not the same. e rst, increasing GABA levels at the synapse, will stimulate both GABAA and GABAB receptors. e second, the action of benzodiazepines, will enhance the inuence of GABAA receptors only. is dierence in GABA receptor stimulation may have profound clinical consequences. An example is the important observation that some GABA-enhancing drugs (resulting in stimulation of both types of GABA receptor) used to treat epilepsy can precipitate certain seizure types. is may relate to actions at the dierent GABA receptors and is considered in Box 16.3.
Drugs acting mainly through these mechanisms include benzodiazepines, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and sodium valproate.
16.3.3 Blocking T-type Ca2+ channels
is cellular mechanism is placed in a separate category largely because the AED ethosuximide, believed to derive its therapeutic eect mainly by blocking T-type Ca2+ channels, has a separate prole of clinical use (see below), being used for absence seizures. Understandably this has led to the suggestion that T-type channel inhibition prevents this type of seizure. is idea receives some support from the observation that sodium valproate, which acts in part by blocking T-type channels, can also be eective against absence seizures.
418 Chapter 16 Epilepsy
Box 16.3
Proepileptic effects of antiepileptic drugs
It is recognized that some AEDs precipitate or exacerbate certain types of seizure. is presents a challenge to our understanding of epilepsy and normal brain function. However, it must be said that our knowledge of this issue is imperfect, and is mostly limited to the exacerbation of absence seizures by certain AEDs.
e most common observation is that absence seizures can be elicited by GABA-enhancing drugs. How can a pathology that is due to uncontrolled excitation be made worse by increasing the main inhibitory inuence in the brain? e simple explanation is that some of this inhibition is exerted on pathways which are themselves inhibitory, leading to a net excitatory eect. is is illustrated in Figure e.
AEDs may increase GABA inuence by increasing its concentration at the synapse, resulting in increased activity at GABAA and GABAB receptors. Alternatively, drugs can act at the GABAA receptor selectively. We have noted that absence seizures may be precipitated by the non-specic GABA-enhancing drugs (e.g.
vigabatrin and tiagabine). In contrast, benzodiazepines (e.g. clonazepam), which bind and enhance the GABAA receptor/Cl– channel but do not aect GABAB receptors, do not worsen absence seizures and are used in their management. is has led to the suggestion that it is specically the GABAB stimulatory eect that presents a problem with absence seizures. is has been incorporated into the model in Figure e.
is is a highly complex area, as illustrated by the following points.
1) We know, for example, that in the hippocampus GABAB receptors can inhibit glutamate release from some neurons and GABA release from others. However, the overall role of GABA in the brain to prevent seizure activity is not in doubt (see Box 16.1).
2) An important complicating issue is that the eect of manipulating GABA at its dierent receptors depends on the brain region involved. is may be true for both GABAA and GABAB receptors.
A drug that increases the stimulation of an inhibitory GABA receptor here …….
B
GABA
GABA
GABA
GABA
receptors
A
GABA
receptors
Figure e Hypothetical scheme indicating how GABAB receptor
agonists may enhance excitability in a neuronal network.
GABAergic (i.e. GABA-releasing) neurons are shown with red axons and terminals; glutamatergic (i.e. glutamate-releasing) are shown with green axons and terminals. Cell bodies with GABA receptors are shown in red, open where these are GABAA receptors and solid for GABAB receptors. In this hypothetical scheme we can see that an agonist at an inhibitory GABAB receptor, such as those found in the hippocampus (within the temporal lobe), may reduce the inhibitory influence of GABAA receptors on glutamate release, and so lead to excitation. This can precipitate epileptiform activity.
B
Glutamate
Glutamate
……. will increase activity at the glutamate neurons here
+
+
Excitation
16.4 Drugs used in the treatment of epilepsy 419
Box 16.3 Proepileptic effects of antiepileptic drugs
3) ere is a prospect of regional selectivity for AEDs in the future; there are, for example, two known subtypes of GABAB receptors, GABAB1 and GABAB2. Four further isoforms of GABAB1 have been cloned which have specic regional distributions in the brain. Possible future development of drugs selective for these isoforms may help to resolve the issue of proepileptic activity of some AEDs.
e issue of enhancement of absence seizures with AEDs is not limited to GABA-enhancing drugs. It has also been associated with one of the other main AED mechanisms of action: delay of Na+ channel recovery in rapidly-ring neurons (Box 16.2). is means that
carbamazepine, for example, may precipitate absence seizures.
e outcome at the present time for clinical use is that ethosuximide or sodium valproate can be used for absence seizures; both act, at least in part, by blocking T-type Ca2+ channels.
But just when you thought you had reached the end of this set of complexities, it must also be noted that proepileptic eects are not limited to absence seizures: there is concern that using ethosuximide alone in patients with both absence and tonic–clonic seizures may risk increasing the frequency of generalized tonic–clonic seizures.

16.4 Drugs used in the treatment of epilepsy

An orderly classication of AEDs on the basis of the mechanism of action at the cellular and molecular level cannot be made, because so many of these drugs have multiple actions. In addition, it is not fully understood how many (if not most) of them work. Knowing which drugs are most useful against which types of seizure is obviously important, but not satisfactory as a basis for classication because many drugs have diverse clinical applications. Here, then, we divide drugs into two categories: older, rst-generation drugs and newer, second-generation drugs. Brief comments about the mechanisms of action and clinical use of the major drugs in each category are provided. It should be noted that not all AEDs are mentioned. In the nal section (Section
16.5), the strategy for treating epilepsy with drugs is discussed.
16.4.1 First-generation AEDs
In most cases of epilepsy these are likely to be the rst drugs tried.
Sodium valproate
is is one of the drugs available as rst-line medication for all seizure types, and is particularly favoured as a rst drug for primarily generalized seizures. It is also used in migraine and as a mood stabilizer, for example as an alternative to lithium for bipolar disorder (Chapter 19).
ere is no adequate account of sodium valproate’s mechanism of antiepileptic action. As with many other AEDs, its therapeutic response is likely to be the result of several mechanisms acting in concert, including:
• enhanced GABA inuence—inhibition of GABA
transaminase and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (see Box 16.1, Figure a)
• decreased glutamate inuence by moderation of
NMDA receptors
• blocking T-type Ca2+ channels
• use-dependent blocking of voltage-sensitive Na+
channels.
Adverse eects include risk of teratogenicity (birth defects) and liver toxicity, especially in young children.
Carbamazepine
is is a drug of choice for partial and primarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures. e principal mechanism of action is probably use-dependent blocking of voltage-sensitive Na+ channels (Box 16.2). It is not used for absence seizures as, like other drugs with this mode of action, it may exacerbate this type of seizure (Box 16.3). In addition, carbamazepine has been shown to enhance GABA function and block L-type Ca2+ channels. Like sodium valproate, it is also used for other conditions including pain disorders, particularly trigeminal
420 Chapter 16 Epilepsy
neuralgia (a type of neuropathic pain), as well as bipolar illness (Section 19.3). Carbamazepine is widely used in the treatment of epilepsy. It should, however, be noted that the drug is a strong inducer of hepatic microsomal CYP enzymes, and its use is therefore complicated by numerous drug interactions.
Phenytoin
Like carbamazepine, phenytoin is a rst-choice drug for partial and primarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures; it is not used for absence seizures. Its main action is thought to be use-dependent blocking of voltage-sensitive Na+ channels. e metabolism of phenytoin shows saturation kinetics; hence plasma drug level monitoring is important to aid dosing.
Fosphenytoin is a pro-drug of phenytoin, and can be administered by intramuscular injection in situations where taking phenytoin orally is not possible, for instance to combat seizures during neurosurgery.
Benzodiazepines
Not commonly rst-line drugs for epilepsy, benzodiazepines are also used in the treatment of insomnia and anxiety (Chapter 19). ey are of great pharmacological interest because of the mechanism by which they interact with the GABAA receptor, with its intrinsic Cl– channel (see Box 16.1, Figure b) so as to
• increase the anity of the GABAA receptor for GABA
• increase the current through the GABAA receptor Cl–
channel.
ese eects combine to selectively enhance the inuence at the GABAA receptor. Clonazepam is available to treat all forms of epilepsy, but its use may be limited by its tendency to produce drowsiness. Diazepam, along with midazolam and clonazepam, can be given intravenously to treat status epilepticus. e rapid onset of action of benzodiazepines, in contrast with that of many AEDs, makes them particularly useful for this condition where the need for treatment is urgent.
Phenobarbital
is barbiturate is one of the oldest antiepileptic drugs. Typical of this drug group, it has some highly unwelcome pharmacokinetic properties, including powerful induction of hepatic CYP enzymes. It therefore lowers the plasma concentration of several clinically important drugs (e.g. oral contraceptives, steroids, and warfarin)
when taken concurrently. Phenobarbital is now rarely used due to its high toxicity in overdose, when it causes respiratory and circulatory failure, and coma. Primidone is a pro-drug metabolized to phenobarbital, and therefore has similar uses.
Ethosuximide
Unusually for an AED, the use of this drug is limited to essentially one seizure type—absence seizures. It is also unusual in that its molecular mode of action is relatively selective as a T-type Ca2+ channel blocker. Ethosuximide and sodium valproate are the drugs of choice for absence seizures. However, in approximately 50% of patients who suer from both absence seizures and tonic–clonic seizures, ethosuximide leaves the tonic–clonic aspect untreated. In addition, reported adverse eects include possible exacerbation of tonic–clonic seizures in some patients with this mixed epilepsy. Sodium valproate remains a sensible option for the treatment of such individuals.
16.4.2 Second-generation AEDs
e last 20 years or so have seen the introduction of a bewildering variety of AEDs, some developed with specic cellular/molecular targets, and most commonly aimed at mechanisms which enhance GABA function. Some of these drugs are introduced here.
Lamotrigine
Lamotrigine is a drug of choice for partial seizures
(including secondarily generalized) and primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures. It may be rst line, or second line after sodium valproate or carbamazepine if these drugs have not proved eective. It may be used alone or in combination with another drug. It is believed to act mainly as a use-dependent Na + channel blocker (Box 16.2) but, in contrast with other drugs with this mechanism of action (e.g. carbamazepine and phenytoin), it can be used to treat absence seizures.
Topiramate
Topiramate can be used either alone or in combination
with other agents for partial and primary generalized tonic–clonic seizures. It is, however, more widely prescribed for non-epileptic conditions (migraine and bipolar disorders) and combines several mechanisms of action, including:
• use-dependent blocking of voltage-sensitive Na+
channels
16.5 Strategy and side effects in the drug treatment of epilepsy 421
• enhanced GABAA receptor function
• blocking action of glutamate at AMPA receptors
• blocking L-type Ca2+ channels.
Gabapentin
is is an AED initially designed to interact directly with GABA receptors as a GABA-mimetic. It failed to do this, but was found to have antiepileptic properties nevertheless. It is used mainly for partial seizures, either alone or more commonly as an add-on therapy.
Gabapentin has other widespread uses, including
treatment of neuropathic pain and prophylaxis of migraine. Its mechanisms of action may include interaction with voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels.
Pregabalin is a more potent analogue of gabapentin,
but otherwise is very similar. Both drugs are generally better tolerated than other AEDs, the most usual adverse eects being sedation, dizziness, and ataxia (aected speech, balance, and coordination). ey also have the advantage of few drug interactions, again unlike most AEDs, facilitating their use in combination with other drugs.
Vigabatrin
Vigabatrin is used as an add-on drug to treat partial
seizures when monotherapy has failed. is drug is an irreversible inhibitor of GABA transaminase, increasing GABA concentration in the synapse (see Box 16.1). It suers from common and serious visual eld disturbance side eects, and therefore should only be used as a last resort.
Tiagabine
is is another drug available as an add-on in the prevention of partial seizures. Tiagabine inhibits neuronal and glial uptake of GABA by the GAT-1 transporter, increasing and prolonging GABA inuence at the synapse (see Box 16.1).
Oxcarbazepine
is is a chemical derivative of carbamazepine, but with the advantage over the parent compound of not inducing hepatic CYP enzymes, and consequently suering fewer drug interactions. It is a use-dependent voltage-sensitive Na+ channel blocker (Box 16.2), which may be used as adjunct therapy in the treatment of partial and generalized seizures. Oxcarbazepine is also used in bipolar disorder.

16.5 Strategy and side effects in the drug treatment of epilepsy

e objective of antiepileptic drug therapy for all patients is the elimination of seizures with only one drug. is is achieved more often in children than in adults. e initial drug should be a rst-generation AED, but the exact drug chosen will depend on the individual patient, particularly with respect to their age, nature of seizures, comorbidities, and potential interactions with other drugs being taken. is last consideration is of particular importance with AEDs, and guidance from an appropriate reference source should be sought. Many of the antiepileptics (e.g. carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, barbiturates, and topiramate) are inducers of hepatic enzymes, and this can lead to reduced eectiveness of many drugs. Amongst those aected are oral contraceptives, and patients may be advised to use non-hormonal contraceptive methods (e.g. barrier methods) instead.
All epileptic drugs have a limited window for eective treatment with minimum adverse eects, meaning that dosage is very important and that it may be necessary, where possible, to monitor plasma levels of the drug. For example, as mentioned previously, phenytoin plasma
levels are considered important, although sodium valproate plasma levels are less critical. Target plasma concentrations can be obtained from a reference source.
If a single drug is not eective or not acceptable due to side eects (see below), its use should be tapered and a second drug introduced and used alone. is pursuit of monotherapy may be abandoned if a maximal dose of a single drug that does not have unacceptable side eects brings benet but does not deliver adequate control. at drug may be continued and a further drug, an add-on (adjunct therapy), considered. However, before combination therapy is considered, it is important to ensure that monotherapy failure is not due to poor compliance, a common problem with drugs used prophylactically.
e selection of drug combinations for AED polytherapy is likely to be based on clinical considerations, but it is of interest to note that combinations based on complementary mechanisms of action have been reported to be useful. It has been suggested, for example, that combining a Na+ channel blocker with a drug that