Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5595_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
272 Chapter 11 Respiratory disease: asthma and COPD
Volume expired (litres)
FVC
Box 11.2
Obstructive versus restrictive lung disorders
Obstructive lung disorders are dened by diculty in emptying the lungs because of either narrowing of the airways or structural damage. ere is increased airway resistance to the ow of air. Asthma and COPD are both obstructive diseases.
Restrictive lung disorders are characterized by diculty in lling the lungs which also have a reduced capacity. Airway resistance is not increased. Restrictive lung disease can be caused by such conditions as pulmonary brosis and obesity.
Computerized spirometry measurements are useful in distinguishing between obstructive and restrictive disorders. Measurements are recorded using a computerized spirometer in a clinical setting. e patient stands, makes a maximal inspiration, and then exhales forcefully and completely into a mouthpiece
5
FEV
1
4
Normal
(Norm)
connected to the spirometer. e values recorded are compared with predicted values for the patient, which take into account factors inuencing lung function, such as race, gender and age. A number of lung parameters are measured. e most revealing in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma and COPD are:
• forced vital capacity (FVC)—maximum volume of
air that is expelled after a maximal inspiration
• forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)—
volume of air that is expelled in the rst second when measuring FVC.
e FEV1 value is expressed as a ratio of FVC, and in healthy individuals should be greater than 0.7, indicating that more than 70% of the air is expelled in the rst second of forced expiration (Figure b).
Obstructive
3
(Obs)
FEV
1
(Res)
FEV
1
2
1
12
Figure b Typical spirometry traces for a healthy subject
compared with patients with obstructive and restrictive disorders.
FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
In obstructive disorders, where airways are narrowed due to structural damage or inammation and bronchoconstriction, air is expelled more slowly than
FVC
Restrictive
3
Time (seconds)
usual; this gives rise to a reduced FEV1. ere may be air left in the lungs at the end of a full expiration and so the FVC may also be reduced, although not to the
11.4 Treating asthma 273
Box 11.2 Obstructive versus restrictive lung disorders
same extent as the FEV1. Overall, the FEV1/FVC is reduced to less than 0.7 (Figure b), indicating the reduced proportion of air that is expelled in the rst second of the forced expiration; this is a diagnostic feature of obstructive disorders.
By contrast, in restrictive diseases there is an inability to expand the lungs fully; FVC is consequently reduced. As air is able to ow freely, the FEV1, although also low, represents the normal 70% or more of FVC (i.e. the FEV1/FVC ratio is normal).
e FEV1/FVC ratio is extremely important diagnostically; where a reduced FEV1 is recorded, the
cause bronchoconstriction by antagonizing 2­adrenoceptors on bronchiolar smooth muscle. 1­Selective agents have a lower risk, but at high dose they lose selectivity, and should be avoided in asthmatics (see Chapter 5, Section 5.2.5). (It should be noted that these agents are selective but not specic for -adrenoceptor subtypes.)
Non-steroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in particular aspirin, can trigger asthma (‘aspirin-sensitive’ asthma). ese drugs block the conversion of arachidonic acid into thromboxane A2 and prostaglandins by inhibiting the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase (see Chapter 9, Section 9.3.1, for more details). When this pathway is
ratio provides a means of distinguishing between obstructive and restrictive disorders.
A further parameter of lung function measured during spirometry investigations is peak expiratory ow (PEF)—maximal airow rate on forced expiration (usually referred to as peak ow). is can also be measured with a simple hand-held device that can easily be used at home. Such a device produces a less reliable measure of lung function than spirometry, but gives a useful indication of improvement or deterioration. As such, this parameter is useful for self-monitoring purposes in asthma (the progression of COPD is not monitored in this way).
blocked, arachidonic acid is diverted into the biosynthesis of a number of leukotrienes, mediators of inammation implicated in the asthma disease process. e properties of leukotrienes include bronchoconstriction, stimulation of bronchial gland and mucus secretions, and recruiting leucocytes (e.g. eosinophils) to the site of inammation. (Not surprisingly, the receptors for leukotrienes are therapeutic targets in asthma; see Section 11.4.3). Aspirin sensitivity is seen in approximately 10% of asthma suerers; if previous use has precipitated asthma, rhinitis, urticaria, or angioedema (swelling of the deeper dermal layers of skin, often aecting the face), all NSAIDs should be avoided.

11.4 Treating asthma

Asthma treatment involves two main classes of drugs, bronchodilators and anti-inammatories. Bronchodilators are useful in reversing the bronchoconstriction experienced in the early phase of the disease process, providing relief from symptoms. Short-acting drugs with relatively fast onset of action are often referred to as ‘reliever medication’. To eectively manage asthma, the underlying inammation in the late phase must also be tackled; anti-inammatory drugs are known as ‘preventers/controllers’.
11.4.1 Bronchodilators
2-adrenoceptor agonists
As noted above, bronchiolar smooth muscle cells express
2-adrenoceptors and their activation leads to
bronchodilatation (Figure 11.3). Short-acting selective
2-adrenoceptor agonists (SABAs) such as salbutamol
and terbutaline are therefore used to relieve symptoms of breathlessness in asthma. Similarities in the structures of salbutamol and the physiological agonist adrenaline are shown in Figure 11.6.
274 Chapter 11 Respiratory disease: asthma and COPD
OH
OH
HO
HO
HO
H N
CH
Adrenaline Salbutamol
OH
H N
HO
3
HO
O
H N
CH
CH
3
CH
3
3
HO
Figure 11.6 Chemical structures of adrenaline, salbutamol, and salmeterol.
Structures of the endogenous agonist adrenaline, the short-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol, and the long-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol. Differences between the molecules are shown in pink. The methyl group of the secondary amine in adrenaline is replaced with a tertiary butyl group in salbutamol. This change alters the molecule from a non-selective agonist that acts at all adrenoceptor subtypes to a selective 2-adrenoceptor agonist. In salmeterol, this group is extended into a long lipophilic side chain, which enables the drug to intercalate into the plasma membrane, increasing its duration of action.
Given by inhalation, SABAs have a rapid onset of action within 5–10 minutes, with the maximum eect occurring at about 30 minutes and lasting for 3–5 hours. ey are used on an ‘as required’ basis and are the drug of choice for acute exacerbations of asthma. ey are also used prophylactically in patients with exercise-induced asthma.
e duration of action of the long-acting inhaled 2­adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) salmeterol and
formoterol is extended to around 12 hours. Salmeterol
takes eect more slowly than salbutamol (around 10–20 minutes) and is used as preventer rather than reliever medication. Formoterol, like salbutamol, is eective within a few minutes, and can therefore be used to relieve symptoms. Safety concerns have, however, been raised over LABAs; their use as monotherapy has been linked with an increase in asthma-related deaths through a masking of ongoing airway inammation. ey are recommended only where control is not achieved with inhaled corticosteroids (see Section 11.4.2), and then always alongside regular use of a steroid. In this respect, combination inhalers containing both drugs are useful, although they obviously restrict the ability to alter the dose of each component.
Salmeterol
e longer duration of action of salmeterol and formoterol reects their increased lipophilicity. Salmeterol has a long lipophilic side chain (Figure 11.6) which (it is postulated) intercalates into the plasma membrane at an ‘exoreceptor site’, in close proximity to the receptor. e remainder of the molecule can then freely interact with the active site. Diusion of the molecule away from the exoreceptor site is slow, hence the long duration of action. Alternatively it has been proposed that salmeterol enters the lipid bilayer and binds to the receptor from within the membrane (Figure 11.7). e reason for formoterol’s long duration of action has not been established unequivocally, but may involve accumulation of molecules close to the receptor to form a reservoir, from where they slowly diuse to activate the receptor from the outside. For both salmeterol and formoterol, the increased duration of action means they can be given twice a day, and also makes them particularly useful for night-time symptoms.
Several ultra-long-acting 2 adrenoceptor agonists have been developed with even greater lipophilicity and with a duration of action of around 24 hours. Of these only
vilanterol has been approved for use in asthma.
11.4 Treating asthma 275
Salbutamol
Formoterol
Salmeterol
Membrane
β
adrenoceptor
Binding site
Figure 11.7 Binding of short-acting and long-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonists.
The short-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol accesses the receptor’s binding site from outside the cell. By contrast, the lipophilic structure of the long-acting agonist salmeterol allows it to accumulate within the membrane close to the binding site, from where it stimulates the receptor. Formoterol also penetrates the phospholipid bilayer to create a reservoir of drug. Unlike salmeterol, binding to the receptor is believed to be achieved from the outside, once drug has been released from the membrane store.
2
As mentioned earlier (Section 11.1.2), 2-adrenoceptors are expressed on a number of immune and inammatory cells present in the asthmatic airways, including mast cells and T-lymphocytes. Activation of these receptors leads to a decrease in the release of histamine from granules in mast cells, and decreased production of interleukins by T-lymphocytes. Such eects may also contribute to the therapeutic response of the asthmatic airway to 2-adrenoceptor agonists.
e main side eect of inhaled 2-adrenoceptor agonists is tremor, arising from stimulation of 2-adrenoceptors in skeletal muscle. Hepatic glycogenolysis is also stimulated by 2-adrenoceptor agonists and can lead to hyperglycaemia. e drugs also stimulate the Na+/K
+
-ATPase, and can lead to decreased plasma levels of K+ (hypokalaemia) through enhanced cellular uptake of K+. Hypokalaemia can induce serious arrhythmias; repeated use of SABAs has been linked to deaths as a result. e agonists are selective, but not specic for 2­adrenoceptors, and so tachycardia and palpitations may result from activation of cardiac 1-adrenoceptors.
Oral 2-adrenoceptor agonists have a limited role because of the far greater risk of potential adverse eects than when inhaled. Preparations of salbutamol, terbutaline,
and bambuterol are available for oral administration where inhalation cannot be managed. Bambuterol is a pro-drug of terbutaline with a longer duration of action. Unlike the other two drugs, which are taken three or four times daily, it can be taken once daily.
Antimuscarinic drugs
As noted above (Section 11.1.2) bronchoconstriction is mediated by the M3 muscarinic receptor, providing a rationale for the use of antimuscarinic agents in the treatment of airway disease. However, 2-adrenoceptor agonists, which are both faster acting and more eective bronchodilators, are generally preferred. e only antimuscarinic drug used to provide relief in chronic asthma is the short-acting drug ipratropium. (Long­acting antimuscarinics have a role in the management of COPD, and are discussed later.) Ipratropium is used second line, added to 2-adrenoceptor agonists in patients where control has not been achieved by these agents.
Ipratropium is a derivative of atropine, the naturally occurring alkaloid derived from the deadly nightshade plant (Atropa belladonna). Like atropine, it does not distinguish between muscarinic receptor subtypes. e
276 Chapter 11 Respiratory disease: asthma and COPD
benecial eects are derived from the antagonism of M3 receptors on:
• bronchiolar smooth muscle to counteract
bronchoconstriction
• goblet cells to reduce secretions of mucus and their
viscosity, aiding mucociliary clearance.
In addition to blocking M3 receptors, ipratropium antagonizes M2 autoreceptors on ACh-releasing nerve terminals. is reduces their negative feedback inuence on the further release of ACh, which is thereby increased; this counteracts the antagonism of M3 receptors.
Ipratropium is used as a second-line agent, added to
2-adrenoceptor agonists in patients where these agents
have not achieved control. It is also used to reverse bronchospasm precipitated by 2-adrenoceptor antagonists (see Section 11.3.3). Its onset of action occurs around 15 minutes after inhalation, peaks after about 1–2 hours, and lasts for 3–6 hours. Wide-ranging side eects due to non-selective antagonism are largely avoided when ipratropium is inhaled; distribution around the body is limited by its high polarity and consequent inability to penetrate plasma membranes to enter the bloodstream. Ipratropium is generally well tolerated; its most common adverse eects are dry mouth and throat irritation.
Methylxanthine drugs
Theophylline and its salt aminophylline
(ethylenediamine salt) are the main methylxanthines used in lung disease. Caeine is a methylxanthine,2 and has been used in medicine for its bronchodilator properties for centuries; nowadays it is used only as a respiratory stimulant in premature babies. eophylline is a bronchodilator, and it too directly stimulates the respiratory centre, resulting in increased respiration which may be of benet to patients with COPD (see below); this property is also exploited in treatment of premature babies with hypoventilation.
Methylxanthines are known to non-selectively inhibit phosphodiesterases (PDE), the family of enzymes responsible for breaking down cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP. is eect, though, is only seen at concentrations which far exceed therapeutic levels of theophylline; the mechanism of action in vivo is not understood.
2 eobromine, found in chocolate, is also a methylxanthine.
ere are ve main isoforms of PDE, with PDE3 and PDE4 selective for cyclic AMP. PDE4 is expressed in inammatory cells (e.g. eosinophils) and is one of the targets for novel asthma treatments.
Methylxanthines are non-selective antagonists of adenosine receptors. Activation of A1 and A2B adenosine receptors on mast cells enhances the release of inammatory mediators. Antagonism of these receptors by theophylline may explain some of this drug’s benecial action in asthma.
Evidence for the long-term ecacy of theophylline is lacking. It is generally only used as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma is not adequately managed with corticosteroids.
eophylline has a narrow therapeutic window which seriously limits its usefulness. Toxic eects arise at plasma concentrations only just over the therapeutic range. Toxicity involves stimulation of the CNS, cardiovascular system, and gastrointestinal tract, leading to a range of adverse eects including insomnia, palpitations, tachycardia, nausea, and vomiting. (Allergy to ethylenediamine can lead to additional problems such as urticaria and dermatitis when administering aminophylline.) At high doses theophylline can produce serious and potentially fatal cardiac and central eects such as cardiac arrhythmias and seizures. Its use therefore requires therapeutic drug monitoring. Trough (pre-dose) levels should be between 10 and 20 mg/l (55 and 110 mol/l); levels at the lower end appear to be eective and may not require monitoring. (is is also explored in Chapter 3, Section 3.4.1.)
eophylline is metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 enzymes, but the rate varies greatly between individuals. Metabolism is decreased in liver disease, heart failure, and viral infections, in elderly patients, and by a number of drugs that inhibit CYP enzymes, including some macrolide antibiotics (e.g. erythromycin and clarithromycin) and the H2 antihistamine cimetidine; increased theophylline levels result. e interaction with antibiotics is clinically relevant, as a severe asthma attack precipitated by a chest infection may require antibiotic treatment. If the patient is taking theophylline and the dose is not altered, toxicity could ensue.
Metabolism of theophylline is increased, and hence plasma concentrations decreased, by inducers of CYP450 enzymes. A number of drugs, including phenytoin and
11.4 Treating asthma 277
carbamazepine, have this eect, as does alcohol consumption and smoking cigarettes. e half-life of theophylline may be decreased by as much as 60% in heavy smokers. is is an important consideration for patients who stop smoking whilst on theophylline; metabolism will be reduced and plasma concentrations may reach toxic levels.
11.4.2 Corticosteroids
Corticosteroids (glucocorticoids) are the cornerstone of therapy for everyone with asthma, with the exception of those with mild intermittent symptoms which can be eectively managed by a short-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonist. Corticosteroids tackle the underlying inammation in asthma and are central to the management of the condition. e mode of action of these drugs is covered in detail in Chapter 9, Section 9.3.2 and Box 9.2. In essence, they target nuclear receptors for the endogenous glucocorticoids, of which cortisol is the primary example. ese receptors are expressed by virtually every cell type in the body and mediate wide­ranging eects on immunity, as well as on the metabolism of carbohydrates and proteins. Corticosteroid drugs act by directly entering cells and interacting with these glucocorticoid receptors. e ligand–receptor complexes form dimers which are translocated to the nucleus, where they alter the expression of an array of genes. e consequences of altered gene transcription are decreased activation of inammatory cells and mediators, and a dampening down of the immune response. Amongst the benecial actions of glucocorticoids in asthma are:
• reduced transcription of the gene for IL-2, the
interleukin which promotes the clonal proliferation of T-helper cells (see Section P3.2.2 and Figure P3.2 in the Introduction to Part 3 of this book)
• reduced recruitment of eosinophils into lung tissue and
reduction in their activity
• increased expression of 2-adrenoceptors
• reduced number of mast cells in respiratory lining with
long-term treatment.
As the therapeutic eect relies upon changes in rates of protein synthesis, it develops slowly, requiring weeks or months for full development.
In addition to the well-recognized eects of corticosteroids on gene transcription, it has recently
become apparent that some of their actions are mediated by more rapidly activated pathways involving protein kinases or phosphatases. So, for instance, PKC-mediated phosphorylation and activation of annexin-1, a protein with potent anti-inammatory actions, occurs within minutes of glucocorticoid treatment (see Chapter 9, Box 9.2).
Most commonly, corticosteroids are inhaled, allowing the delivery of potent agents directly to the lung tissue, thereby reducing potential systemic eects.
Beclometasone and budesonide were the rst inhaled
corticosteroids to be developed; newer agents include
ciclesonide and fluticasone. Ciclesonide is an inactive
pro-drug, which is converted in the lungs by esterases to the active form desisobutyryl-ciclesonide. is local conversion may be advantageous in further reducing both systemic and local side eects. e equivalent doses of the commonly used oral and inhaled corticosteroids are given in Table 11.2.
Although administration through inhalation reduces the likelihood of adverse systemic eects, the use of inhaled corticosteroids long term, or in high dose, is associated with increased risk of a number of side eects, including adrenal suppression, decreased bone mineral density, cataracts, and skin thinning. Use in children has been linked with early growth retardation through a negative feedback eect of corticosteroids on hypothalamic output of growth hormone-releasing factor (GHRF), and therefore of growth hormone (GH); normal adult height will probably still be reached. Other eects include increased risk, particularly in the elderly, of respiratory tract infections including pneumonia. To minimize the
Table 11.2 Comparative potency of common oral and
inhaled corticosteroids
Corticosteroid Equivalent doses
Oral Inhaled
Hydrocortisone 100 mg N/A
Prednisolone 25 mg N/A
Prednisone 25 mg N/A
Beclometasone N/A
Budesonide N/A
Fluticasone N/A
Ciclesonide N/A
100 g
200 g
100 g
80 g
278 Chapter 11 Respiratory disease: asthma and COPD
possibility of such adverse eects, most management guidelines recommend restricting the use of inhaled corticosteroids to the lowest dose that achieves satisfactory relief from symptoms. It is important to note that inhaled corticosteroids have a fairly at dose– response curve; increasing the dose above a daily 250 g uticasone/beclometasone produces little therapeutic benet, whilst substantially increasing the risk of side eects.
e most common adverse eect is the development of oral thrush, caused by the deposition of corticosteroids on the back of the throat and mouth. e local suppression of anti-infective mechanisms allows colonization by the fungus Candida albicans, which therefore thrives, and candidiasis develops. e risk is lessened through use of a spacer which reduces oropharyngeal deposition, and/or rinsing and gargling with water and spitting out after inhalation. is practice will also reduce the risk of systemic side eects: drug deposited in the mouth or throat will be swallowed, and then absorbed into the blood.
Combination inhalers of corticosteroids and long­acting 2-adrenoceptor agonists
As noted above, inhalers are available which combine corticosteroids with LABAs. ese reduce the number of devices needed and may therefore improve adherence. ey also address the recommendation that LABAs are only administered with concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy (see Section 11.4.1).
11.4.3 Other drugs used for asthma
treatment
A number of other agents can be introduced as second or third line in the management of asthma, usually when maximal doses of inhaled corticosteroids have been reached.
Cromolyns
Inhaled sodium cromoglicate or nedocromil are occasionally used in asthma and can reduce the extent of the early and late phases, as well as hyper-reactivity of the airways; they do not aect bronchodilatation. eir mechanism of action is not clearly understood; they are sometimes referred to as ‘mast cell stabilizers’, but this does not underlie their action in asthma. e eect on airway hyper-reactivity may be mediated through reduced activation of TRPV1 receptors on sensory nerves and the subsequent inhibition of the neuronal reexes (see Section 11.1.1). Cromolyns are less eective than inhaled corticosteroids, but may be useful where they are not tolerated. ey are only useful prophylactically; their lack of bronchodilator action means they are not eective in an acute attack.
Inhaled cromolyns are generally well tolerated with few side eects except mouth and throat irritation, and occasionally bronchospasm and headache. Because of their short duration of action they have to be given four times a day.
Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists
Oral corticosteroids
e risk of the wide-ranging and potentially serious side eects associated with corticosteroids as set out above is obviously far greater when these drugs are administered orally. is route is therefore usually reserved for short courses in severe asthma exacerbations where symptoms cannot be controlled with maximal inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators, or where rapid deterioration is seen.
Prednisolone and prednisone are used most commonly;
prednisone is inactive until converted in the body to prednisolone. Corticosteroids do not need to be tapered o at the end of a short course, as the hypothalamic– pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is not signicantly suppressed (see Chapter 9, Section 9.3.2, for more discussion of HPA suppression).
e cysteinyl leukotrienes C4, D4, and E4 are powerful bronchodilators and mediators of inammation which are released from activated inammatory cells such as mast cells and eosinophils which inltrate asthmatic airways. ese mediators have a central role in the pathogenesis of asthma, exerting their eects through activation of the CysLT1 receptor expressed on bronchiolar smooth muscle cells. ey also stimulate increased mucus secretions. e CysLT1 receptor subtype is also expressed by eosinophils themselves, providing an example of autocrine signalling; leukotrienes act on the same cells that release them, to encourage their further release. CysLT1 receptors are Gq-coupled GPCRs, whose activation leads to increased cytosolic Ca (see Chapter 2, Section 2.2.4).
Two selective CysLT1 receptor antagonists (LTRAs),
montelukast and zafirlukast, are used in clinical
2 +
concentration
11.5 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 279
practice. Trials have shown that when used alone they are less eective bronchodilators than salbutamol. In combination with inhaled corticosteroids, though, they can have a useful steroid-sparing function. ey also appear to be eective in aspirin-induced asthma where leukotrienes play a central role.
Montelukast has a long duration of action and can be given once a day, while zarlukast is given twice a day. Both drugs are well tolerated, with gastrointestinal upset and headache the main side eects.
IgE antagonists
Omalizumab is a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody. It binds
and inactivates IgE to prevent allergen-mediated release of inammatory mediators from mast cells so as to inhibit both early and late phases of asthma. Its use is reserved for patients with severe persistent asthma with high levels of circulating IgE levels, whose symptoms are not controlled by other treatments. Clinical trials have shown that omalizumab reduces symptoms, improves quality of life, and reduces required doses of inhaled corticosteroids in such individuals. Administered by subcutaneous injection, it is an expensive option. It acts to reduce IgE
levels within hours, although a full eect is not seen for several days. It has a long duration of action and is usually administered every 2–4 weeks, at a dose informed by IgE levels.
Omalizumab is generally well tolerated, with injection site reactions being the main adverse eect. However, like any protein, it has the potential to cause anaphylactic reactions.
11.4.4 Guidelines for treating asthma
Most guidelines, including GINA, recommend a stepwise additive approach to choosing therapy based on asthma severity and symptom control. e GINA recommendations are shown in Box 11.3.
e drugs available for the treatment of asthma are eective in all but a few refractory cases, and yet it remains a poorly controlled disease and leads to many avoidable deaths. Enabling patients to appreciate the inammatory basis of the disease, and the impact of bronchodilators on airways resistance, will in turn aid appropriate and correct use of medication; its benets will be maximized and exacerbations of their condition thereby avoided.

11.5 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

COPD is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and is likely to rise in the near future. It is most usually, although not always, caused by the damage done to the lungs by smoking cigarettes. Like asthma, COPD is an obstructive pulmonary disorder; FEV1 is reduced, as is the FEV1/FVC ratio (see Box 11.2, and also Workbook 8 at the end of this chapter). Unlike asthma, however, the obstruction is not reversible; COPD is nearly always progressive (see Figure 11.8).
COPD is a disease state rather than a single disease. It mainly comprises chronic bronchitis and emphysema, and while these can exist independently, most suerers of COPD have both. Chronic bronchitis is inammation throughout the airways, and involves a range of cells and mediators, although these are not as well characterized as they are in asthma. Importantly, this inammation is not eectively dampened down by the anti-inammatory actions of corticosteroids.
Emphysema aects the alveoli. When healthy, the alveolar walls are elastic and they expand and return to their original size with each breath, like a new balloon. In
emphysema, elastin bres in the walls are broken down by the action of elastases released during the inammatory response. e alveolar walls become hard and resistant, more like blowing up a paper bag! Eventually individual alveoli are destroyed and coalesce into larger spaces. e consequent loss of surface area limits gas exchange, and is responsible for the respiratory failure seen in COPD.
e exact symptoms of COPD experienced by the patient depend on the relative contribution of emphysema or chronic bronchitis to his/her condition. Each of these diseases is associated with characteristic features which are reected in the appearance of the suerer. is is explored in Workbook 8 where Ian’s COPD is dominated by chronic bronchitis and this is reected in his appearance on examination. As noted earlier though, for most patients the pathophysiology of COPD is a mixture of the two conditions.
Bronchial secretions are increased in COPD as bronchial glands enlarge and goblet cells proliferate, leading to increased mucus production. Ciliary function is also
280 Chapter 11 Respiratory disease: asthma and COPD
Box 11.3
Adapted GINA guidelines on asthma management
Step-up if control is not achieved
6
Consider step-down once control is achieved
5
+ Anti IgE
4
+ LTRA
or
3
LD-ICS + LTRA
or
2
LTRA LABA
1
Mild
intermittent
asthma
Figure c Stepwise management of asthma in adults. Preferred treatments are shown in coloured boxes;
alternative options are given in grey boxes.
Step 1 Use inhaled short-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonists (salbutamol or terbutaline) as required. If needed more than twice a week, prophylactic treatment should be considered.
Step 2 Add regular preventer therapy—standard low dose inhaled corticosteroids, considered equivalent to 100–400 g budesonide, twice daily (see Table 11.2 for equivalent doses of inhaled corticosteroids). An LTRA may be considered as an alternative.
Step 3 Add regular inhaled LABA. Inhaled corticosteroids can be increased up to maximum of standard dose range (400 g budesonide, twice daily). As alternatives, if LABA is deemed to be ineffective, patient can be given an LTRA or modified-release theophylline.
Step 4 Increase inhaled corticosteroids to medium-high dose, equivalent to 400–1000 g budesonide, twice daily. The addition of an LTRA or theophylline may be considered to spare the use of corticosteroids.
Step 5 A serious exacerbation of asthma necessitates the addition of oral corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose to provide adequate control; other treatment options should be considered to minimize their use. The patient should be referred for specialist care. Anti-IgE therapy should only be instigated where IgE levels are shown to be high.
Once control is achieved, stepping down to the previous level should be considered. For mild persistent asthma, the dose of inhaled corticosteroid should be the lowest possible to maintain control.
Anti IgE, anti-immunoglobulin E therapy; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonist; LD-ICS, low dose inhaled corticosteroid; LTRA, leukotriene receptor antagonist; Theo, theophylline.
Low dose ICS
Short-acting
Mild
persistent
asthma
β
-adrenoceptor agonist on an ‘as needed’ basis
2
LD-ICS + Theo
Low dose ICS
+ Theo
LABA LABA
Medium or
high dose ICS
Oral
corticosteroids
High dose ICS
Lung function
11.5 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 281
function in patients with COPD. ey are used on an ‘as required’ basis, providing relief from bronchoconstriction for around 4 hours. If breathlessness persists or
Asthma
exacerbations continue, a long-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA) can be introduced. In addition to the LABAs used in asthma (see Section 11.4.1), three ultra-long-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonists (ULABAs)
COPD
have been approved for use in COPD: olodaterol,
indacaterol, and vilanterol. All three drugs have a rapid
onset of action, similar to that of salbutamol. e
Exacerbations
prolonged duration of action allows once-daily dosing. In trials, these drugs have been shown to improve quality of
Time
life of COPD patients when added to their usual medication. e benecial eects of ULABAs may be
Figure 11.8 Comparison of lung function over time for
asthma and COPD.
Exacerbations, or flare-ups, are experienced in both conditions, but in asthma lung function returns to a normal baseline between attacks; the underlying obstruction is reversible. In contrast, in COPD lung function deteriorates progressively; the disease process is not reversible.
additive with those of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs); a combined inhaler of vilanterol and umeclidinium (see below) has recently been licensed for use in adult COPD patients in the UK.
Inhaled antimuscarinic drugs
Antagonists at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors
(mAChRs) have a more central role in the management of compromised and therefore the mucus tends to build up, blocking the alveoli and reducing gas exchange. e patient is additionally at increased risk of viral or bacterial infection because of the reduced eectiveness of the defensive mechanisms. Overall, COPD patients tend to have slowly declining lung function interspersed with exacerbations, often caused by lung infections (Figure 11.8).
COPD compared with asthma, and have a signicant
bronchodilator eect. e short-acting muscarinic
antagonist (SAMA) ipratropium, given on an ‘as required’
basis, can be used to provide short-term relief in mild
COPD. It is a non-selective antagonist, acting at all
muscarinic subtypes. M1, M2, and M
3
present at dierent locations in the respiratory tract (see
Section 11.1.2). e consequences of antagonizing the
dierent subtypes are considered in Section 11.4.1; not all
11.5.1 Management of COPD
Smoking cessation
e most signicant intervention to slow COPD progression and the decline in lung function is to stop smoking. Patients should be oered help in achieving this goal through psychological as well as pharmacological means. Drugs which combat nicotine addiction directly target the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). ey include nicotine replacement therapy (e.g. patches, chewing gum, and inhalers), the antagonist bupropion, and the partial agonist varenicline. (Nicotine addiction and its treatment are explored in Chapter 21,
are benecial.
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) include
tiotropium, glycopyrronium, umeclidinium, and
aclidinium; as bronchodilators they are as eective in
COPD as LABAs. LAMAs have a similar anity for all
muscarinic subtypes. However, they show functional
selectivity for the M3 receptor by virtue of the fact that
they dissociate much more quickly from the M2 receptor
than from the M3 receptor.3 e exact reason for the
prolonged duration of action of LAMAs is as yet unclear,
but may reect the slow diusion of drug away from the
micro-environment of the receptor, allowing re-binding
Section 21.4.)
3 e prolonged duration of action of LAMAs has been attributed in a
Bronchodilators
Inhaled short-acting 2-adrenoceptor agonists (SABAs; see Section 11.4.1) have been shown to improve lung
number of studies to extended receptor occupancy and very long
dissociation half-lives (e.g. 35 hours for tiotropium at the M3 receptor).
is has been refuted by others, who claim the results reect the
non-physiological conditions under which these experiments were
conducted.