Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3734_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Acute Stanford type A,
DeBakey Type I Thoracic
Aortic Dissection
489
Malperfusion?
No
Central Aortic
Repair
Malperfusion?
No
Standard post operative TAD
management
Yes
Yes
Syndrome (bowel
or lower extremity
Definitive surgical
Yes
Malperfusion
infarction)?
Yes
management
Evidence of
impeding aortic
rupture?
No
Hematoma at Proximal landing zone or
No
major arterial branches fed by false lumen?
Yes
Consider endovascular
fenestration
No
Consider Thoracic
Endovascular Aortic
Repair (TEVAR)
Fig. 3 Algorithm for management of acute type A aortic dissection with visceral or lower extremity malperfusion. In patients who are considered candidates for aortic intervention, the presence of
visceral or lower extremity malperfusion may direct the initial strategy for management. This may
include ischemia of the digestive tract, kidneys or lower extremities. Malperfusion on presentation
can be assessed by history, physical exam, and/or laboratory or imaging ndings. If after central
aortic repair, malperfusion syndrome (infarction of intraabdominal organs or lower extremity muscle) is present, denitive management is warranted. This may include exploratory laparoscopy/
laparotomy or open/endovascular treatment to restore ow to the ischemic organ with possible
resection of necrotic tissue or fasciotomy
Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction
Aortic dissection presenting with myocardial ischemia is rare, occurs in approximately 3% of TAD patients, and carries a poor prognosis [34]. The presentation of
myocardial ischemia is usually in the right coronary artery territory. The etiology
may be coverage of the ostia by the dissection ap, extension of the dissection into
the coronary artery or thrombosis of the vessel [39]. In a Japanese series, 6% of
patients presented with myocardial ischemia, and the mortality rate was 33% (as
compared to 8% in patients without ischemia) [40]. Postoperative myocardial ischemia can have several causes including poor myocardial protection, unrecognized
coronary artery disease, aortic root dissection leading to ostial coronary occlusion,
coronary dissection, embolism, obstruction from an aortic valve prosthesis or complications from coronary button implantation in root replacement. Recalcitrant
malignant arrhythmias (VT/VF) that occur after aortic cross clamp release and
reperfusion of the myocardium that do not abate should raise suspicion for myocardial ischemia. If myocardial ischemia is recognized in the operating room or in the
early post-operative period, revision of the offending process can be undertaken.
Often the simplest solution is to perform coronary artery bypass grafting to the
ischemic territory as dened by wall motion abnormality on the echocardiogram.
Revascularization should be prompt and within 3–6 h to avoid signicant

490
https://t.me/med1917
myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography can be used, however, the lesion may
not be amenable to percutaneous intervention and may delay denitive management. If the injury is global, multi vessel CABG or veno-arterial extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with a vent to decompress the left ventricle
[41] and may be considered to facilitate potential recovery [42]. Finally, total articial heart or transplant may be considered in the event of unrecoverable, devastating
myocardial damage in appropriate candidates [43].
M. P. Robich and J. S. Lawton
Aortic Complications
Complications of the aortic root and descending thoracic aorta may occur following
replacement of the ascending aorta alone for the treatment of TAD.Early rupture of
the unrepaired thoracic aorta after TAD repair occurs in in 1–2% of patients [44]. In
a series of 324 patients who had TAD repair there were 7 patients (2%) with early
aortic rupture and 100% mortality [45]. Two of the patients had aortic root rupture.
Both patients had aortic insufciency pre-operatively, intra-operative bleeding from
the aortic root and high blood pressures prior to the rupture. The aortic roots of these
patients were described as “fragile”. In retrospect, the authors report that these
patients should have had root replacement at the initial operation. Five patients in
the series had rupture of the descending thoracic aorta. The authors conclude that
meticulous blood pressure management should be maintained post-operatively.
TAD presenting with aortic insufciency may be a marker of more extensive
aortic root involvement, and root replacement may be considered in these patients.
Data from the IRAD database indicate that 59% of patients had a supracoronary
ascending aortic graft utilized alone in the treatment of TAD. Thirty-four percent
had root procedures including aortic valve-sparing procedure (6%) or composite
root replacement (16%) [46]. Patients with moderately-severe aortic insufciency
pre-operatively and those with more than mild aortic insufciency after surgery
were at signicantly higher risk of severe aortic insufciency 10years after the
index operation [47]. Additionally, some authors have advocated for aortic root
replacement instead of repair to decrease the need for reoperation [48].
Neurologic Complications
Following repair of TAD, patients may have neurologic injury ranging from delirium to overt stroke. Approximately 10% of patients with TAD initially present with
a brain injury, and approximately 70% of those patients also have aortic arch vessel
dissection. Interestingly, 85% of patients in one study had improvement in stroke
symptoms following surgery, suggesting that pre-operative stroke should not be a

ab
Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
491
contraindication to TAD repair [46]. In one retrospective study of 102 TAD patients,
30% of patients presented with some neurologic symptom [49]. Mortality was 23%
and the authors found that 50% of patients had post-operative neurologic symptoms.
These included ischemic stroke (14%), spinal cord ischemia (4%), ischemic
neuropathy (3%), hypoxic encephalopathy (8%), nerve compression (7%), and
postoperative delirium (15%).
Stroke after repair of acute type A aortic dissection is a devastating complication.
In one study of TAD patients, post-operative stroke occurred in 16% [50]. Risk
factors for stroke included: bovine aortic arch, pre-operative CPR, and malperfusion.
Patients with peri-operative stroke were more likely to have complications and
longer hospital stay, but did not have an increased risk of in-hospital mortality.
Treatment of post-operative stroke is usually supportive as these patients are not
candidates for systemic lytic therapy and embolectomy is often not fruitful. A rare
complication of TAD can occur when the aortic tear is circumferential and the false
lumen telescopes proximally and distally simultaneously causing neurologic
symptoms and myocardial ischemia and/or aortic sufciency (Fig.4).
Seizure at presentation is rare (about 3%) and post-operative seizure is also
uncommon and reported to be approximately 0.4%. A study in which all patients
underwent EEG monitoring during surgery showed an intra-operative seizure rate
of 1.8% when DHCA was employed [51]. Patients with pre-operative neurologic
symptoms appear to be at higher risk of seizure. Patients who remain in coma after
cessation of all sedation will often require EEG to assess for seizure or other types
of brain injury.
Fig. 4 Schematic demonstrating a complete circumferential tear of the ascending aortic false
lumen with intussusception proximally and distally (a). Representative sagittal view from a contrasted enhanced CT scan showing a complete circumferential tear and intimal intussusception (b).
This rare presentation can lead to simultaneous myocardial ischemia and/or aortic insufciency
and neurologic symptoms

492
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Illustration of the
frozen elephant aortic
repair technique. There are
several permutations of
this approach, but the
major goal is to treat the
proximal aorta as well as
the aortic arch and
proximal descending
thoracic aorta. This may
lead to treatment of the
entire diseased aorta or
prepare for a later stage
intervention on the
remaining diseased aorta
by open or endovascular
approach. This example
depicts an ascending aortic
replacement with hybrid
aortic arch management
including Zone 2
replacement and frozen
elephant trunk with
physician modication of
the thoracic endograft to
allow for insertion of a
branch stent into the left
subclavian artery
M. P. Robich and J. S. Lawton
Paraplegia can be a presenting symptom and has been reported to occur in
approximately 3% of patients. It can be transient or permanent in nature and may
resolve with restoration of the true lumen. For surgeons who employ the frozen
elephant trunk the paraplegia rate is approximately 5% and is based on the length of
the stent graft (12% for 150mm stents vs. 2.5% for 100mm stents) [52] (Fig.5). In
a meta-analysis of patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk the rate of paraplegia
was twice that of patients having standard aortic arch operations [53]. Most authors
have recommended using a 100mm stent graft and avoiding 150mm length stents
or covering distal to the T8 level.
Other Complications
Patients with TAD are often critically ill, and like other cardiac surgery patients, are
at risk for the usual maladies of the intensive care unit. Reported incidences of postoperative complications include: respiratory failure requiring prolonged mechanical
ventilation (>72h and/or tracheostomy) 6%, renal failure with oliguria in 3%, and
mediastinitis in 2% [44]. Ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter associated
bloodstream infections and catheter associated urinary tract infections can also
occur in patients in the intensive care unit long-term.

Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
493
Summary
TAD patients are complex and require expeditious, thoughtful, and competent medical and operative management by the entire surgical team with a constant high
index of suspicion for complications. Complications of operative management of
TAD can be substantial and life-threatening and include: bleeding, malperfusion,
myocardial ischemia, aortic complications, and neurologic events. Careful operative planning, meticulous surgical technique and thorough post-operative management can help improve patient outcomes.
References
1. Crawford ES, Kirklin JW, Naftel DC, Svensson LG, Coselli JS, Sa HJ. Surgery for acute
dissection of ascending aorta. Should the arch be included? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
1992;104(1):46–59.
2. Fann JI, Smith JA, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Grunkemeier G, etal. Surgical man-
agement of aortic dissection during a 30-year period. Circulation. 1995;92(9 Suppl):II113–21.
3. Kazui T, Washiyama N, Bashar AH, Terada H, Suzuki T, Ohkura K, etal. Surgical outcome of
acute type A aortic dissection: analysis of risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(1):75–81.
4. Robich MP, Koch CG, Johnston DR, Schiltz N, Chandran Pillai A, Hussain ST, etal. Trends in
blood utilization in United States cardiac surgical patients. Transfusion. 2015;55(4):805–14.
5. Mora Mangano CT, Neville MJ, Hsu PH, Mignea I, King J, Miller DC.Aprotinin, blood loss,
and renal dysfunction in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl
1):I276–81.
6. Zindovic I, Sjogren J, Bjursten H, Bjorklund E, Herou E, Ingemansson R, etal. Predictors and
impact of massive bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.
2017;24(4):498–505.
7. Cabasa A, Pochettino A.Surgical management and outcomes of type A dissection—the Mayo
Clinic experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5(4):296–309.
8. Fine NL, Applebaum J, Elguezabal A, Castleman L.Multiple coagulation defects in associa-
tion with dissecting aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 1967;119(5):522–6.
9. Paparella D, Rotunno C, Guida P, Malvindi PG, Scrascia G, De Palo M, etal. Hemostasis
alterations in patients with acute aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(5):1364–9.
10. ten Cate JW, Timmers H, Becker AE.Coagulopathy in ruptured or dissecting aortic aneu-
rysms. Am J Med. 1975;59(2):171–6.
11. Gelb AB, Roth RI, Levin J, London MJ, Noall RA, Hauck WW, etal. Changes in blood coagu-
lation during and following cardiopulmonary bypass: lack of correlation with clinical bleeding. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106(1):87–99.
12. Huang B, Tian L, Fan X, Zhu J, Liang Y, Yang Y. Low admission platelet counts predicts
increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection. Int J
Cardiol. 2014;172(3):e484–6.
13. Tanaka M, Kawahito K, Adachi H, Ino T.Platelet dysfunction in acute type A aortic dissection
evaluated by the laser light-scattering method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):837–41.
14. Coselli JS, Crawford ES, Beall AC Jr, Mizrahi EM, Hess KR, Patel VM.Determination of
brain temperatures for safe circulatory arrest during cardiovascular operation. Ann Thorac
Surg. 1988;45(6):638–42.
15. Mezrow CK, Midulla PS, Sadeghi AM, Gandsas A, Wang W, Dapunt OE, etal. Evaluation of
cerebral metabolism and quantitative electroencephalography after hypothermic circulatory
arrest and low-ow cardiopulmonary bypass at different temperatures. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 1994;107(4):1006–19.

494
https://t.me/med1917
16. Polderman KH.Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications of hypother-
mia. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(7 Suppl):S186–202.
17. Ferrara A, MacArthur JD, Wright HK, Modlin IM, McMillen MA. Hypothermia and
acidosis worsen coagulopathy in the patient requiring massive transfusion. Am J Surg.
1990;160(5):515–8.
18. Hanke AA, Dellweg C, Kienbaum P, Weber CF, Gorlinger K, Rahe-Meyer N.Effects of des-
mopressin on platelet function under conditions of hypothermia and acidosis: an invitro study
using multiple electrode aggregometry*. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(7):688–91.
19. Leshnower BG, Myung RJ, Thourani VH, Halkos ME, Kilgo PD, Puskas JD, etal. Hemiarch
replacement at 28°C: an analysis of mild and moderate hypothermia in 500 patients. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2012;93(6):1910–5. discussion 5-6
20. Keenan JE, Wang H, Gulack BC, Ganapathi AM, Andersen ND, Englum BR, etal. Does
moderate hypothermia really carry less bleeding risk than deep hypothermia for circulatory
arrest? A propensity-matched comparison in hemiarch replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2016;152(6):1559–69. e2
21. Svensson LG.Hemostasis for aortic surgery. J Card Surg. 1997;12(2 Suppl):229–31.
22. Vivacqua A, Koch CG, Yousuf AM, Nowicki ER, Houghtaling PL, Blackstone EH, etal.
Morbidity of bleeding after cardiac surgery: is it blood transfusion, reoperation for bleeding,
or both? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(6):1780–90.
23. David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Barnard S.Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Ann
Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1999–2001. discussion 14-9
24. Lawton JS, Liu J, Kulshrestha K, Moon MR, Damiano RJ Jr, Maniar H, etal. The impact of
surgical strategy on survival after repair of type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2015;150(2):294–301. e1
25. Roselli EE, Idrees JJ, Bakaeen FG, Tong MZ, Soltesz EG, Mick S, etal. Evolution of simplied
frozen elephant trunk repair for acute DeBakey Type I dissection: midterm outcomes. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2018;105(3):749–55.
26. Rylski B, Urbanski PP, Siepe M, Beyersdorf F, Bachet J, Gleason TG, et al. Operative
techniques in patients with type A dissection complicated by cerebral malperfusion. Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(2):156–66.
27. Spotnitz WD.Active and mechanical hemostatic agents. Surgery. 2007;142(4 Suppl):S34–8.
28. Strauch JT, Spielvogel D, Lansman SL, Lauten AL, Bodian C, Griepp RB.Long-term integrity
of Teon felt-supported suture lines in aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(3):796–800.
29. Zindovic I, Sjogren J, Ahlsson A, Bjursten H, Fuglsang S, Geirsson A, etal. Recombinant fac-
tor VIIa use in acute type A aortic dissection repair: a multicenter propensity-score-matched
report from the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 2017;154(6):1852–9. e2
30. Yang B, Patel HJ, Williams DM, Dasika NL, Deeb GM.Management of type A dissection with
malperfusion. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5(4):265–74.
31. Geirsson A, Szeto WY, Pochettino A, McGarvey ML, Keane MG, Woo YJ, etal. Signicance of
malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(2):255–62.
32. Lawton JS.Acute type A aortic dissection 101. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(4):769–70.
33. Lawton JS, Moon MR, Liu J, Koerner DJ, Kulshrestha K, Damiano RJ Jr, etal. The profound
impact of combined severe acidosis and malperfusion on operative mortality in the surgical
treatment of type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):897–904.
34. Mehta RH, Suzuki T, Hagan PG, Bossone E, Gilon D, Llovet A, etal. Predicting death in
patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Circulation. 2002;105(2):200–6.
35. Deeb GM, Williams DM, Bolling SF, Quint LE, Monaghan H, Sievers J, etal. Surgical delay
for acute type A dissection with malperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(6):1669–75. discussion 75-7
M. P. Robich and J. S. Lawton

Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
36. Kamman AV, Yang B, Kim KM, Williams DM, Michael Deeb G, Patel HJ.Visceral malp-
erfusion in aortic dissection: the Michigan experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2017;29(2):173–8.
37. Rodriguez R, Robich MP, Plate JF, Trooskin SZ, Sellke FW.Gastrointestinal complications
following cardiac surgery: a comprehensive review. J Card Surg. 2010;25(2):188–97.
38. Henke PK, Williams DM, Upchurch GR Jr, Proctor M, Cooper JV, Fang J, etal. Acute limb
ischemia associated with type B aortic dissection: clinical relevance and therapy. Surgery.
2006;140(4):532–9. discussion 9-40
39. Spittell PC, Spittell JA Jr, Joyce JW, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD, Schaff HV, etal. Clinical features
and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990).
Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(7):642–51.
40. Kawahito K, Adachi H, Murata S, Yamaguchi A, Ino T.Coronary malperfusion due to type A
aortic dissection: mechanism and surgical management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(5):1471–6.
discussion 6
41. Donker DW, Brodie D, Henriques JPS, Broome M.Left ventricular unloading during veno-
arterial ECMO: a review of percutaneous and surgical unloading interventions. Perfusion.
2019;34(2):98–105.
42. Lorusso R, Centofanti P, Gelsomino S, Barili F, Di Mauro M, Orlando P, etal. Venoarterial
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute fulminant myocarditis in adult patients: a
5-year multi-institutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(3):919–26.
43. Attia T, Robich M, Lincoff AM, Shishehbor MH, Svensson L, Smedira NG.Successful treat-
ment of aortic root dissection complicated with extensive myocardial infarction using the total
articial heart. J Surg Case Rep. 2017;2017(8):rjx123.
44. Chiappini B, Schepens M, Tan E, Dell' Amore A, Morshuis W, Dossche K, etal. Early and late
outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection: analysis of risk factors in 487 consecutive patients.
Eur Heart J. 2005;26(2):180–6.
45. Kimura N, Tanaka M, Kawahito K, Yamaguchi A, Ino T, Adachi H.Early postoperative aortic
rupture following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.
2009;8(4):431–4.
46. Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Eusanio MD, Sechtem U, et al.
Insights from the International Registry of acute aortic dissection: a 20-year experience of
collaborative clinical research. Circulation. 2018;137(17):1846–60.
47. Kim DJ, Lee S, Lee SH, Youn YN, Chang BC, Yoo KJ, etal. The fate of residual aortic regurgi-
tation after ascending aorta replacement in type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2020;160(6):1421–1430.e5.
48. Halstead JC, Spielvogel D, Meier DM, Rinke S, Bodian C, Malekan R, etal. Composite aortic
root replacement in acute type A dissection: time to rethink the indications? Eur J Cardiothorac
Surg. 2005;27(4):626–32. discussion 32-3
49. Gaul C, Dietrich W, Friedrich I, Sirch J, Erbguth FJ.Neurological symptoms in type A aortic
dissections. Stroke. 2007;38(2):292–7.
50. Dumfarth J, Koer M, Stastny L, Plaikner M, Krapf C, Semsroth S, etal. Stroke after emergent
surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: predictors, outcome and neurological recovery. Eur
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(5):1013–20.
51. Cheung AT, Weiss SJ, Kent G, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Stecker MM.Intraoperative seizures
in cardiac surgical patients undergoing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest monitored with
EEG.Anesthesiology. 2001;94(6):1143–7.
52. Preventza O, Liao JL, Olive JK, Simpson K, Critsinelis AC, Price MD, et al. Neurologic
complications after the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a meta-analysis of more than 3000
patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(1):20–33. e4
53. Hanif H, Dubois L, Ouzounian M, Peterson MD, El-Hamamsy I, Dagenais F, etal. Aortic arch
reconstructive surgery with conventional techniques vs frozen elephant trunk: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(3):262–73.
495

Neuroprotection During Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
ChristianV.Ghincea, YukiIkeno, AndrewL.Mesher, MuhammadAftab,
andT.BrettReece
Introduction
The care of acute aortic syndrome patients can be incredibly complicated based on
the anatomic divergences in perfusion that can occur to any end organ. Essentially,
any tissue bed can be compromised due to loss of perfusion from either lack of
cardiac output or loss of peripheral branch perfusion by true lumen compression or
branch avulsion. The brain and spinal cord, of course, have the least tolerance to
interruption of blood ow; therefore, preservation of ow is paramount. This chapter discusses the approaches to optimizing neurological outcomes when presented
with acute aortic syndrome. As these approaches are not linear, the discussion
addresses different problems that may present at varying times for varying patients.
However, thoughtful consideration of an evolving picture is required for securing
optimal outcomes, including neurological.
Presentation
Optimizing neurological outcomes begins as soon as the patient is identied by
addressing the specic patients’ condition at presentation and operative planning
based on specic patients’ unique dissection anatomy. This is paramount as both
systemic and regional malperfusion can lead to neurological complications. Indeed,
intraoperative neuroprotection approaches must not only align with, but to some
extent, they will dictate the conduct of the operation. However, a myriad ofbackup
plans must be engrained with some exibility to evolve to alternate techniques
C. V. Ghincea · Y. Ikeno · A. L. Mesher · M. Aftab · T. BrettReece (*)
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
e-mail: brett.reece@cuanschutz.edu
J. S. Coselli et al. (eds.), Aortic Dissection and Acute Aortic Syndromes,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66668-2_35
497© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

498
https://t.me/med1917
uidly as patients’ physiology and anatomy can be different than the imaging suggests or even change with dissection progression.
C. V. Ghincea et al.
Mitigation ofPrior Injury andRestoration ofCerebral Perfusion
Intraoperative neuroprotection strategy begins with mitigation of antecedent neurological injury followed by the prompt correction of central nervous system ischemia,
or “neuromalperfusion.” For patients presenting with stroke symptoms or spinal malperfusion, the injury must be deemed to benet from an operation. In most situations,
the patient will be better served by an operation than medical management. The exceptions may be dense coma, the extremes of age, extensive malperfusion of the gut, or
loss of hemodynamics prior to arriving in the operating room, among others. Once
surgical intervention is decided upon, the initial objective is to improve blood ow to
the ischemic territory by optimizing cerebral and spinal perfusion and minimizing
systemic hypotension. In the preoperative period, management revolves around medical therapy to balance perfusion and risk of dissection propagation or rupture. In
almost all cases, the patient should undergo impulse control therapy, to reduce the
blood pressure and heart rate resulting in a lesser pulse pressure. Careful coordination
with the anesthesia team is necessary, in particular during anesthetic induction to prevent hemodynamic collapse. Signicant aortic insufciency or the presence of a pericardial effusion should prompt complete readiness of the surgical team at the time of
induction. While this statement may seem obvious to the experienced team, subsequent intraoperative neuroprotection strategies may be nullied by the cumulative
effects of multiple episodes of neuromalperfusion in the perioperative period.
Following induction, the subsequent, and nearly synonymous, neuroprotective
strategy at the initiation of the operation requires prompt restoration of adequate
cerebral and spinal perfusion. Malperfusion to the central nervous system can result
from systemic or regional malperfusion. In cases of hemodynamically signicant
pericardial effusion, relief of tamponade is the logical rst step to restore cardiac
output. If a patient arrests on induction, the authors advocate immediate median
sternotomy and pericardiotomy. This approach stands in contrast to common
approaches of peripheral cannulation and immediate institution of cardiopulmonary
bypass prior to sternotomy. We favor urgent sternotomy up front for a number of
reasons. Pericardial tamponade frequently contributes to hemodynamic collapse
and decompression can rapidly restore perfusion, at the same time relieving venous
obstruction and hypotension contributing to decreased cerebral perfusion pressure.
Aortic rupture can be controlled manually or with packing while cannulating for
cardiopulmonary bypass. In the case of severe aortic insufciency, there is the
opportunity to decompress the left ventricle immediately after institution of CPB
and prevent periods of ventricular distention. Of course, if enough team members
are available simultaneous peripheral cannulation may be helpful with the caveat
that the retrograde aortic perfusion can be complicated further by the dissection
characteristics. Cannulation of the true lumen may not be straightforward from the

Neuroprotection During Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
femorals without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and/or transesophageal echo to
guide cannula placement emergently.
In cases of complex dissection involving the brachiocephalic vessels, an extensive compressive dissection ap, with or without luminal thrombosis, may contribute to ongoing cerebral malperfusion despite pericardial drainage and initiation of
bypass. Although patients presenting with neurological decits have historically
had a worse post-operative prognosis, earlier cerebral reperfusion may promote
recovery, especially if less than 5h [1]. These cases should be identied on preoperative imaging with development of a repair strategy to restore cerebral perfusion
early in the conduct of the operation. At centers with specialization in aortic surgery,
these patients will undergo full arch replacement with specic early bypass beyond
the dissected head vessel such as the distal common carotid during systemic cooling. In fact, results from the University of Pittsburgh suggests an incredibly low
stroke rate with early bypass to exclude proximal dissection in the brachiocephalic
vessels [2]. While this approach does require planning and a split arterial line, it also
removes the risk of cerebral embolization from the proximal perfusion vessels. The
risk of dissection-related malperfusion in these vessels, both in the short and long
term, will be essentially eliminated after bypass and reperfusion of the vessel.
499
Cannulation
Signicant variation in practice continues among aortic surgeons with regards to
cannulation strategies for repair of acute aortic dissection. Figure1 illustrates the
most common arterial cannulation sites utilized by our institution. While benets of
various sites of cannulation can be taken advantage of for specic dissection characteristics, the main principle remains restoration of ow to the true lumen of the
aorta. In rare, and what might be considered salvage cases, the aorta can be transected and true lumencannulated directly, or cannulation can be achieved through
the apex of the heart. The advantages and disadvantages of our most commonly
utilized cannulation options are discussed here.
Right Axillary Cannulation
Theoretical benets of peripheral right axillary cannulation include avoidance of
atherosclerotic disease burden, intramural hematoma, or proximal dissection in the
ascending aorta, and the ability to perform selective antegrade cerebral perfusion by
occluding the innominate artery at the aortic arch. Arguments against the axillary
stem from either the size of the vessel, leading to high arterial line pressures, or
involvement of the innominate artery with the dissection, complicating the retrograde ow though this artery back to the true lumen systemically. The authors would
argue that the axillary can be used safely in almost all dissections as true lumen ow
is almost always preserved with true lumen ow distally.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
