Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3734_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
Acute Stanford type A,
DeBakey Type I Thoracic
Aortic Dissection
489
Malperfusion?
No
Central Aortic
Repair
Malperfusion?
No
Standard post operative TAD
management
Yes
Yes
Syndrome (bowel or lower extremity
Definitive surgical
Yes
Malperfusion
infarction)?
Yes
management
Evidence of
impeding aortic
rupture?
No
Hematoma at Proximal landing zone or
No
major arterial branches fed by false lumen?
Yes
Consider endovascular
fenestration
No
Consider Thoracic
Endovascular Aortic
Repair (TEVAR)
Fig. 3 Algorithm for management of acute type A aortic dissection with visceral or lower extrem­ity malperfusion. In patients who are considered candidates for aortic intervention, the presence of visceral or lower extremity malperfusion may direct the initial strategy for management. This may include ischemia of the digestive tract, kidneys or lower extremities. Malperfusion on presentation can be assessed by history, physical exam, and/or laboratory or imaging ndings. If after central aortic repair, malperfusion syndrome (infarction of intraabdominal organs or lower extremity mus­cle) is present, denitive management is warranted. This may include exploratory laparoscopy/ laparotomy or open/endovascular treatment to restore ow to the ischemic organ with possible resection of necrotic tissue or fasciotomy
Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction
Aortic dissection presenting with myocardial ischemia is rare, occurs in approxi­mately 3% of TAD patients, and carries a poor prognosis [34]. The presentation of myocardial ischemia is usually in the right coronary artery territory. The etiology may be coverage of the ostia by the dissection ap, extension of the dissection into the coronary artery or thrombosis of the vessel [39]. In a Japanese series, 6% of patients presented with myocardial ischemia, and the mortality rate was 33% (as compared to 8% in patients without ischemia) [40]. Postoperative myocardial isch­emia can have several causes including poor myocardial protection, unrecognized coronary artery disease, aortic root dissection leading to ostial coronary occlusion, coronary dissection, embolism, obstruction from an aortic valve prosthesis or com­plications from coronary button implantation in root replacement. Recalcitrant malignant arrhythmias (VT/VF) that occur after aortic cross clamp release and reperfusion of the myocardium that do not abate should raise suspicion for myocar­dial ischemia. If myocardial ischemia is recognized in the operating room or in the early post-operative period, revision of the offending process can be undertaken. Often the simplest solution is to perform coronary artery bypass grafting to the ischemic territory as dened by wall motion abnormality on the echocardiogram. Revascularization should be prompt and within 3–6 h to avoid signicant
490
https://t.me/med1917
myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography can be used, however, the lesion may not be amenable to percutaneous intervention and may delay denitive manage­ment. If the injury is global, multi vessel CABG or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with a vent to decompress the left ventricle [41] and may be considered to facilitate potential recovery [42]. Finally, total arti­cial heart or transplant may be considered in the event of unrecoverable, devastating myocardial damage in appropriate candidates [43].
M. P. Robich and J. S. Lawton
Aortic Complications
Complications of the aortic root and descending thoracic aorta may occur following replacement of the ascending aorta alone for the treatment of TAD.Early rupture of the unrepaired thoracic aorta after TAD repair occurs in in 1–2% of patients [44]. In a series of 324 patients who had TAD repair there were 7 patients (2%) with early aortic rupture and 100% mortality [45]. Two of the patients had aortic root rupture. Both patients had aortic insufciency pre-operatively, intra-operative bleeding from the aortic root and high blood pressures prior to the rupture. The aortic roots of these patients were described as “fragile”. In retrospect, the authors report that these patients should have had root replacement at the initial operation. Five patients in the series had rupture of the descending thoracic aorta. The authors conclude that meticulous blood pressure management should be maintained post-operatively.
TAD presenting with aortic insufciency may be a marker of more extensive aortic root involvement, and root replacement may be considered in these patients. Data from the IRAD database indicate that 59% of patients had a supracoronary ascending aortic graft utilized alone in the treatment of TAD. Thirty-four percent had root procedures including aortic valve-sparing procedure (6%) or composite root replacement (16%) [46]. Patients with moderately-severe aortic insufciency pre-operatively and those with more than mild aortic insufciency after surgery were at signicantly higher risk of severe aortic insufciency 10years after the index operation [47]. Additionally, some authors have advocated for aortic root replacement instead of repair to decrease the need for reoperation [48].
Neurologic Complications
Following repair of TAD, patients may have neurologic injury ranging from delir­ium to overt stroke. Approximately 10% of patients with TAD initially present with a brain injury, and approximately 70% of those patients also have aortic arch vessel dissection. Interestingly, 85% of patients in one study had improvement in stroke symptoms following surgery, suggesting that pre-operative stroke should not be a
ab
Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
491
contraindication to TAD repair [46]. In one retrospective study of 102 TAD patients, 30% of patients presented with some neurologic symptom [49]. Mortality was 23% and the authors found that 50% of patients had post-operative neurologic symptoms. These included ischemic stroke (14%), spinal cord ischemia (4%), ischemic neuropathy (3%), hypoxic encephalopathy (8%), nerve compression (7%), and postoperative delirium (15%).
Stroke after repair of acute type A aortic dissection is a devastating complication. In one study of TAD patients, post-operative stroke occurred in 16% [50]. Risk factors for stroke included: bovine aortic arch, pre-operative CPR, and malperfusion. Patients with peri-operative stroke were more likely to have complications and longer hospital stay, but did not have an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Treatment of post-operative stroke is usually supportive as these patients are not candidates for systemic lytic therapy and embolectomy is often not fruitful. A rare complication of TAD can occur when the aortic tear is circumferential and the false lumen telescopes proximally and distally simultaneously causing neurologic symptoms and myocardial ischemia and/or aortic sufciency (Fig.4).
Seizure at presentation is rare (about 3%) and post-operative seizure is also uncommon and reported to be approximately 0.4%. A study in which all patients underwent EEG monitoring during surgery showed an intra-operative seizure rate of 1.8% when DHCA was employed [51]. Patients with pre-operative neurologic symptoms appear to be at higher risk of seizure. Patients who remain in coma after cessation of all sedation will often require EEG to assess for seizure or other types of brain injury.
Fig. 4 Schematic demonstrating a complete circumferential tear of the ascending aortic false lumen with intussusception proximally and distally (a). Representative sagittal view from a con­trasted enhanced CT scan showing a complete circumferential tear and intimal intussusception (b). This rare presentation can lead to simultaneous myocardial ischemia and/or aortic insufciency and neurologic symptoms
492
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 5 Illustration of the frozen elephant aortic repair technique. There are several permutations of this approach, but the major goal is to treat the proximal aorta as well as the aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta. This may lead to treatment of the entire diseased aorta or prepare for a later stage intervention on the remaining diseased aorta by open or endovascular approach. This example depicts an ascending aortic replacement with hybrid aortic arch management including Zone 2 replacement and frozen elephant trunk with physician modication of the thoracic endograft to allow for insertion of a branch stent into the left subclavian artery
M. P. Robich and J. S. Lawton
Paraplegia can be a presenting symptom and has been reported to occur in approximately 3% of patients. It can be transient or permanent in nature and may resolve with restoration of the true lumen. For surgeons who employ the frozen elephant trunk the paraplegia rate is approximately 5% and is based on the length of the stent graft (12% for 150mm stents vs. 2.5% for 100mm stents) [52] (Fig.5). In a meta-analysis of patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk the rate of paraplegia was twice that of patients having standard aortic arch operations [53]. Most authors have recommended using a 100mm stent graft and avoiding 150mm length stents or covering distal to the T8 level.
Other Complications
Patients with TAD are often critically ill, and like other cardiac surgery patients, are at risk for the usual maladies of the intensive care unit. Reported incidences of post­operative complications include: respiratory failure requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (>72h and/or tracheostomy) 6%, renal failure with oliguria in 3%, and mediastinitis in 2% [44]. Ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter associated bloodstream infections and catheter associated urinary tract infections can also occur in patients in the intensive care unit long-term.
Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
493
Summary
TAD patients are complex and require expeditious, thoughtful, and competent med­ical and operative management by the entire surgical team with a constant high index of suspicion for complications. Complications of operative management of TAD can be substantial and life-threatening and include: bleeding, malperfusion, myocardial ischemia, aortic complications, and neurologic events. Careful opera­tive planning, meticulous surgical technique and thorough post-operative manage­ment can help improve patient outcomes.
References
1. Crawford ES, Kirklin JW, Naftel DC, Svensson LG, Coselli JS, Sa HJ. Surgery for acute
dissection of ascending aorta. Should the arch be included? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104(1):46–59.
2. Fann JI, Smith JA, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Grunkemeier G, etal. Surgical man-
agement of aortic dissection during a 30-year period. Circulation. 1995;92(9 Suppl):II113–21.
3. Kazui T, Washiyama N, Bashar AH, Terada H, Suzuki T, Ohkura K, etal. Surgical outcome of
acute type A aortic dissection: analysis of risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(1):75–81.
4. Robich MP, Koch CG, Johnston DR, Schiltz N, Chandran Pillai A, Hussain ST, etal. Trends in
blood utilization in United States cardiac surgical patients. Transfusion. 2015;55(4):805–14.
5. Mora Mangano CT, Neville MJ, Hsu PH, Mignea I, King J, Miller DC.Aprotinin, blood loss,
and renal dysfunction in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl
1):I276–81.
6. Zindovic I, Sjogren J, Bjursten H, Bjorklund E, Herou E, Ingemansson R, etal. Predictors and
impact of massive bleeding in acute type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;24(4):498–505.
7. Cabasa A, Pochettino A.Surgical management and outcomes of type A dissection—the Mayo
Clinic experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5(4):296–309.
8. Fine NL, Applebaum J, Elguezabal A, Castleman L.Multiple coagulation defects in associa-
tion with dissecting aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 1967;119(5):522–6.
9. Paparella D, Rotunno C, Guida P, Malvindi PG, Scrascia G, De Palo M, etal. Hemostasis
alterations in patients with acute aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(5):1364–9.
10. ten Cate JW, Timmers H, Becker AE.Coagulopathy in ruptured or dissecting aortic aneu-
rysms. Am J Med. 1975;59(2):171–6.
11. Gelb AB, Roth RI, Levin J, London MJ, Noall RA, Hauck WW, etal. Changes in blood coagu-
lation during and following cardiopulmonary bypass: lack of correlation with clinical bleed­ing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106(1):87–99.
12. Huang B, Tian L, Fan X, Zhu J, Liang Y, Yang Y. Low admission platelet counts predicts
increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172(3):e484–6.
13. Tanaka M, Kawahito K, Adachi H, Ino T.Platelet dysfunction in acute type A aortic dissection
evaluated by the laser light-scattering method. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):837–41.
14. Coselli JS, Crawford ES, Beall AC Jr, Mizrahi EM, Hess KR, Patel VM.Determination of
brain temperatures for safe circulatory arrest during cardiovascular operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45(6):638–42.
15. Mezrow CK, Midulla PS, Sadeghi AM, Gandsas A, Wang W, Dapunt OE, etal. Evaluation of
cerebral metabolism and quantitative electroencephalography after hypothermic circulatory arrest and low-ow cardiopulmonary bypass at different temperatures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107(4):1006–19.
494
https://t.me/med1917
16. Polderman KH.Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications of hypother-
mia. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(7 Suppl):S186–202.
17. Ferrara A, MacArthur JD, Wright HK, Modlin IM, McMillen MA. Hypothermia and
acidosis worsen coagulopathy in the patient requiring massive transfusion. Am J Surg. 1990;160(5):515–8.
18. Hanke AA, Dellweg C, Kienbaum P, Weber CF, Gorlinger K, Rahe-Meyer N.Effects of des-
mopressin on platelet function under conditions of hypothermia and acidosis: an invitro study using multiple electrode aggregometry*. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(7):688–91.
19. Leshnower BG, Myung RJ, Thourani VH, Halkos ME, Kilgo PD, Puskas JD, etal. Hemiarch
replacement at 28°C: an analysis of mild and moderate hypothermia in 500 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(6):1910–5. discussion 5-6
20. Keenan JE, Wang H, Gulack BC, Ganapathi AM, Andersen ND, Englum BR, etal. Does
moderate hypothermia really carry less bleeding risk than deep hypothermia for circulatory arrest? A propensity-matched comparison in hemiarch replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(6):1559–69. e2
21. Svensson LG.Hemostasis for aortic surgery. J Card Surg. 1997;12(2 Suppl):229–31.
22. Vivacqua A, Koch CG, Yousuf AM, Nowicki ER, Houghtaling PL, Blackstone EH, etal.
Morbidity of bleeding after cardiac surgery: is it blood transfusion, reoperation for bleeding, or both? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(6):1780–90.
23. David TE, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Barnard S.Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Ann
Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1999–2001. discussion 14-9
24. Lawton JS, Liu J, Kulshrestha K, Moon MR, Damiano RJ Jr, Maniar H, etal. The impact of
surgical strategy on survival after repair of type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(2):294–301. e1
25. Roselli EE, Idrees JJ, Bakaeen FG, Tong MZ, Soltesz EG, Mick S, etal. Evolution of simplied
frozen elephant trunk repair for acute DeBakey Type I dissection: midterm outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(3):749–55.
26. Rylski B, Urbanski PP, Siepe M, Beyersdorf F, Bachet J, Gleason TG, et al. Operative
techniques in patients with type A dissection complicated by cerebral malperfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(2):156–66.
27. Spotnitz WD.Active and mechanical hemostatic agents. Surgery. 2007;142(4 Suppl):S34–8.
28. Strauch JT, Spielvogel D, Lansman SL, Lauten AL, Bodian C, Griepp RB.Long-term integrity
of Teon felt-supported suture lines in aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(3):796–800.
29. Zindovic I, Sjogren J, Ahlsson A, Bjursten H, Fuglsang S, Geirsson A, etal. Recombinant fac-
tor VIIa use in acute type A aortic dissection repair: a multicenter propensity-score-matched report from the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154(6):1852–9. e2
30. Yang B, Patel HJ, Williams DM, Dasika NL, Deeb GM.Management of type A dissection with
malperfusion. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5(4):265–74.
31. Geirsson A, Szeto WY, Pochettino A, McGarvey ML, Keane MG, Woo YJ, etal. Signicance of
malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: out­comes and need for additional revascularizations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(2):255–62.
32. Lawton JS.Acute type A aortic dissection 101. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(4):769–70.
33. Lawton JS, Moon MR, Liu J, Koerner DJ, Kulshrestha K, Damiano RJ Jr, etal. The profound
impact of combined severe acidosis and malperfusion on operative mortality in the surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(3):897–904.
34. Mehta RH, Suzuki T, Hagan PG, Bossone E, Gilon D, Llovet A, etal. Predicting death in
patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Circulation. 2002;105(2):200–6.
35. Deeb GM, Williams DM, Bolling SF, Quint LE, Monaghan H, Sievers J, etal. Surgical delay
for acute type A dissection with malperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64(6):1669–75. discus­sion 75-7
M. P. Robich and J. S. Lawton
Management ofOperative Complications After Type AAortic Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
36. Kamman AV, Yang B, Kim KM, Williams DM, Michael Deeb G, Patel HJ.Visceral malp-
erfusion in aortic dissection: the Michigan experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(2):173–8.
37. Rodriguez R, Robich MP, Plate JF, Trooskin SZ, Sellke FW.Gastrointestinal complications
following cardiac surgery: a comprehensive review. J Card Surg. 2010;25(2):188–97.
38. Henke PK, Williams DM, Upchurch GR Jr, Proctor M, Cooper JV, Fang J, etal. Acute limb
ischemia associated with type B aortic dissection: clinical relevance and therapy. Surgery. 2006;140(4):532–9. discussion 9-40
39. Spittell PC, Spittell JA Jr, Joyce JW, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD, Schaff HV, etal. Clinical features
and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(7):642–51.
40. Kawahito K, Adachi H, Murata S, Yamaguchi A, Ino T.Coronary malperfusion due to type A
aortic dissection: mechanism and surgical management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(5):1471–6. discussion 6
41. Donker DW, Brodie D, Henriques JPS, Broome M.Left ventricular unloading during veno-
arterial ECMO: a review of percutaneous and surgical unloading interventions. Perfusion. 2019;34(2):98–105.
42. Lorusso R, Centofanti P, Gelsomino S, Barili F, Di Mauro M, Orlando P, etal. Venoarterial
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute fulminant myocarditis in adult patients: a 5-year multi-institutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(3):919–26.
43. Attia T, Robich M, Lincoff AM, Shishehbor MH, Svensson L, Smedira NG.Successful treat-
ment of aortic root dissection complicated with extensive myocardial infarction using the total articial heart. J Surg Case Rep. 2017;2017(8):rjx123.
44. Chiappini B, Schepens M, Tan E, Dell' Amore A, Morshuis W, Dossche K, etal. Early and late
outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection: analysis of risk factors in 487 consecutive patients. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(2):180–6.
45. Kimura N, Tanaka M, Kawahito K, Yamaguchi A, Ino T, Adachi H.Early postoperative aortic
rupture following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8(4):431–4.
46. Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Eusanio MD, Sechtem U, et al.
Insights from the International Registry of acute aortic dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation. 2018;137(17):1846–60.
47. Kim DJ, Lee S, Lee SH, Youn YN, Chang BC, Yoo KJ, etal. The fate of residual aortic regurgi-
tation after ascending aorta replacement in type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(6):1421–1430.e5.
48. Halstead JC, Spielvogel D, Meier DM, Rinke S, Bodian C, Malekan R, etal. Composite aortic
root replacement in acute type A dissection: time to rethink the indications? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(4):626–32. discussion 32-3
49. Gaul C, Dietrich W, Friedrich I, Sirch J, Erbguth FJ.Neurological symptoms in type A aortic
dissections. Stroke. 2007;38(2):292–7.
50. Dumfarth J, Koer M, Stastny L, Plaikner M, Krapf C, Semsroth S, etal. Stroke after emergent
surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: predictors, outcome and neurological recovery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53(5):1013–20.
51. Cheung AT, Weiss SJ, Kent G, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Stecker MM.Intraoperative seizures
in cardiac surgical patients undergoing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest monitored with EEG.Anesthesiology. 2001;94(6):1143–7.
52. Preventza O, Liao JL, Olive JK, Simpson K, Critsinelis AC, Price MD, et al. Neurologic
complications after the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a meta-analysis of more than 3000 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160(1):20–33. e4
53. Hanif H, Dubois L, Ouzounian M, Peterson MD, El-Hamamsy I, Dagenais F, etal. Aortic arch
reconstructive surgery with conventional techniques vs frozen elephant trunk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(3):262–73.
495
Neuroprotection During Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
ChristianV.Ghincea, YukiIkeno, AndrewL.Mesher, MuhammadAftab, andT.BrettReece
Introduction
The care of acute aortic syndrome patients can be incredibly complicated based on the anatomic divergences in perfusion that can occur to any end organ. Essentially, any tissue bed can be compromised due to loss of perfusion from either lack of cardiac output or loss of peripheral branch perfusion by true lumen compression or branch avulsion. The brain and spinal cord, of course, have the least tolerance to interruption of blood ow; therefore, preservation of ow is paramount. This chap­ter discusses the approaches to optimizing neurological outcomes when presented with acute aortic syndrome. As these approaches are not linear, the discussion addresses different problems that may present at varying times for varying patients. However, thoughtful consideration of an evolving picture is required for securing optimal outcomes, including neurological.
Presentation
Optimizing neurological outcomes begins as soon as the patient is identied by addressing the specic patients’ condition at presentation and operative planning based on specic patients’ unique dissection anatomy. This is paramount as both systemic and regional malperfusion can lead to neurological complications. Indeed, intraoperative neuroprotection approaches must not only align with, but to some extent, they will dictate the conduct of the operation. However, a myriad ofbackup plans must be engrained with some exibility to evolve to alternate techniques
C. V. Ghincea · Y. Ikeno · A. L. Mesher · M. Aftab · T. BrettReece (*) University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA e-mail: brett.reece@cuanschutz.edu
J. S. Coselli et al. (eds.), Aortic Dissection and Acute Aortic Syndromes,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66668-2_35
497© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
498
https://t.me/med1917
uidly as patients’ physiology and anatomy can be different than the imaging sug­gests or even change with dissection progression.
C. V. Ghincea et al.
Mitigation ofPrior Injury andRestoration ofCerebral Perfusion
Intraoperative neuroprotection strategy begins with mitigation of antecedent neuro­logical injury followed by the prompt correction of central nervous system ischemia, or “neuromalperfusion.” For patients presenting with stroke symptoms or spinal mal­perfusion, the injury must be deemed to benet from an operation. In most situations, the patient will be better served by an operation than medical management. The excep­tions may be dense coma, the extremes of age, extensive malperfusion of the gut, or loss of hemodynamics prior to arriving in the operating room, among others. Once surgical intervention is decided upon, the initial objective is to improve blood ow to the ischemic territory by optimizing cerebral and spinal perfusion and minimizing systemic hypotension. In the preoperative period, management revolves around medi­cal therapy to balance perfusion and risk of dissection propagation or rupture. In almost all cases, the patient should undergo impulse control therapy, to reduce the blood pressure and heart rate resulting in a lesser pulse pressure. Careful coordination with the anesthesia team is necessary, in particular during anesthetic induction to pre­vent hemodynamic collapse. Signicant aortic insufciency or the presence of a peri­cardial effusion should prompt complete readiness of the surgical team at the time of induction. While this statement may seem obvious to the experienced team, subse­quent intraoperative neuroprotection strategies may be nullied by the cumulative effects of multiple episodes of neuromalperfusion in the perioperative period.
Following induction, the subsequent, and nearly synonymous, neuroprotective strategy at the initiation of the operation requires prompt restoration of adequate cerebral and spinal perfusion. Malperfusion to the central nervous system can result from systemic or regional malperfusion. In cases of hemodynamically signicant pericardial effusion, relief of tamponade is the logical rst step to restore cardiac output. If a patient arrests on induction, the authors advocate immediate median sternotomy and pericardiotomy. This approach stands in contrast to common approaches of peripheral cannulation and immediate institution of cardiopulmonary bypass prior to sternotomy. We favor urgent sternotomy up front for a number of reasons. Pericardial tamponade frequently contributes to hemodynamic collapse and decompression can rapidly restore perfusion, at the same time relieving venous obstruction and hypotension contributing to decreased cerebral perfusion pressure. Aortic rupture can be controlled manually or with packing while cannulating for cardiopulmonary bypass. In the case of severe aortic insufciency, there is the opportunity to decompress the left ventricle immediately after institution of CPB and prevent periods of ventricular distention. Of course, if enough team members are available simultaneous peripheral cannulation may be helpful with the caveat that the retrograde aortic perfusion can be complicated further by the dissection characteristics. Cannulation of the true lumen may not be straightforward from the
Neuroprotection During Dissection Repair
https://t.me/med1917
femorals without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and/or transesophageal echo to guide cannula placement emergently.
In cases of complex dissection involving the brachiocephalic vessels, an exten­sive compressive dissection ap, with or without luminal thrombosis, may contrib­ute to ongoing cerebral malperfusion despite pericardial drainage and initiation of bypass. Although patients presenting with neurological decits have historically had a worse post-operative prognosis, earlier cerebral reperfusion may promote recovery, especially if less than 5h [1]. These cases should be identied on preop­erative imaging with development of a repair strategy to restore cerebral perfusion early in the conduct of the operation. At centers with specialization in aortic surgery, these patients will undergo full arch replacement with specic early bypass beyond the dissected head vessel such as the distal common carotid during systemic cool­ing. In fact, results from the University of Pittsburgh suggests an incredibly low stroke rate with early bypass to exclude proximal dissection in the brachiocephalic vessels [2]. While this approach does require planning and a split arterial line, it also removes the risk of cerebral embolization from the proximal perfusion vessels. The risk of dissection-related malperfusion in these vessels, both in the short and long term, will be essentially eliminated after bypass and reperfusion of the vessel.
499
Cannulation
Signicant variation in practice continues among aortic surgeons with regards to cannulation strategies for repair of acute aortic dissection. Figure1 illustrates the most common arterial cannulation sites utilized by our institution. While benets of various sites of cannulation can be taken advantage of for specic dissection char­acteristics, the main principle remains restoration of ow to the true lumen of the aorta. In rare, and what might be considered salvage cases, the aorta can be tran­sected and true lumencannulated directly, or cannulation can be achieved through the apex of the heart. The advantages and disadvantages of our most commonly utilized cannulation options are discussed here.
Right Axillary Cannulation
Theoretical benets of peripheral right axillary cannulation include avoidance of atherosclerotic disease burden, intramural hematoma, or proximal dissection in the ascending aorta, and the ability to perform selective antegrade cerebral perfusion by occluding the innominate artery at the aortic arch. Arguments against the axillary stem from either the size of the vessel, leading to high arterial line pressures, or involvement of the innominate artery with the dissection, complicating the retro­grade ow though this artery back to the true lumen systemically. The authors would argue that the axillary can be used safely in almost all dissections as true lumen ow is almost always preserved with true lumen ow distally.