Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3733_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Section A Introduction to Embolic Agents
- •Section B Coils and Plugs
- •2 Pushable Coils
- •3 Detachable Coils
- •4 Vascular Plugs
- •5 Gelatin Sponge
- •6 Polyvinyl Alcohol Particles
- •7 Spherical Embolic Agents
- •Section C Particulate Agents
- •8 Drug-Eluting Beads
- •Section D Liquid Agents
- •9 Glue
- •10 EVOH/DMSO in Peripheral Application
- •11 Sclerosing Agents
- •Section E Catheters
- •12 Catheters and Catheterization Techniques
- •13 Vascular Malformations
- •14 Intracranial Aneurysms
- •Section B Head and Neck Embolization
- •15 Epistaxis
- •16 Vascular Tumors
- •17 Carotid Blowout Syndrome
- •Section C Thoracic Embolization
- •18 Hemoptysis
- •19 Pulmonary Arteriovenous Fistulas
- •20 Chest Tumors
- •Section D Trauma Embolization
- •22 Thoracoabdominal Trauma
- •23 Pelvic Trauma
- •24 Extremity Trauma
- •25 Spine and Bone Trauma
- •26 Iatrogenic Lesions
- •Section E Peripheral Embolization
- •27 Peripheral Vascular Malformations

Technical Considerations for Microcatheter Use
A 1-mL or 2.5-mL Luer Lock syringe is recommended when GS is injected
through a microcatheter.16 In addition, the injection of normal saline between
GS injections is recommended to avoid clogging of the microcatheter. Care
should be taken when larger particles (>2 mm) are used because
fragmentation can occur after the microcatheter is passed, resulting in very
small particles and a more distal embolization than intended.
17
Size and Distribution in the Vessels
The size of the GS is not uniform in both manually prepared GS sheets and
preshaped GS.
14,17,18
Specifically for the sheet-shaped GS, the size and
uniformity of the particles largely depend on the preparation technique.
Hand-cut GS is uniform in size, whereas the pumping technique produces
particles with various sizes.18 Katsumori and Kasahara18 reported that cutting
produced lower rates of smaller particles (≤500 μm) and larger particles
(>2,000 μm) than pumping (8.5% vs. 20.4% and 0% vs. 48.1%, respectively)
when Gelfoam was used.
Similar to other embolic materials, the vessel distribution after GS

embolization depends on the size of GS. Although GS is deformable, it has
the tendency to embolize vessels that are smaller than its size. Moreover,
calibrating the size of GS particles is difficult not only for manually prepared
sheet-shaped GS but also for preshaped 1-mm and 2-mm diameter GS.19 In
theory, this represents the disadvantages of GS use, as the level of
embolization is difficult to control. In animal studies, when 1- to 2-mm handcut and preshaped GS were used, the mean diameter of the occluded vessels
was approximately 500 μm.
14,20
In an animal study by Miyamoto,21 GS
particles prepared by pumping were distributed in a wide range of porcine
uterine arteries, including vessels less than 100 μm in diameter.
CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
GS has been used extensively in various disease entities (Table 5.1). It has
been used as antitumor treatment for hypervascular tumors and to control
bleeding in various types of hemorrhages. Although data from randomized
controlled comparative trials with newer spherical embolic materials are
limited, the use of GS as a standard embolic material is supported by wide
clinical experience and various clinical reports.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate stage
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using GS has led to improved clinical
outcome by prolonging survival in randomized controlled trials
22,23
and
meta-analyses.
24–26
The use of GS as a temporary agent in HCC is preferred
because of the necessity to repeat TACE for residual, recurrent, and newly
developed tumors.
Although the use of spherical embolic materials and drug-eluting beads
is emerging in many countries, the use of TACE as a standard procedure
remains controversial because its use is not fully evidence-based. TACE with
iodized oil (Lipiodol, Ethiodol) and anthracycline agents followed by
embolization with GS was developed in Japan in the 1980s.
27–29
This is still a
standard technique of performing TACE for HCC in Asian countries, and a
recent prospective study by Ikeda et al.30 demonstrated a favorable 2-year
survival rate of 75.0%. Key features of this technique include super selective
TACE and use of iodized oil to block the draining route and surrounding
portal blood flow of the tumor.
30,31
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Brown et al.32 first reported a case of embolization with GS for postpartum
hemorrhage (PPH) in 1979. Arterial embolization is now widely used for
PPH, with a reported clinical efficacy of 72% to 100%.
33–35
For arterial
embolization of PPH, the main embolic material has been GS because it
causes temporary occlusion of the vessel, which may prevent damage to the
normal uterine parenchyma and may be sufficient to prevent further bleeding
in most cases. Previous clinical studies showed that menstruation resumed in
93% to 100% of patients after embolization with GS.
35–37
In this case, 1- to
2-mm hand-cut or preshaped GS was used because smaller particles are likely
to cause ischemic complications.
Uterine Fibroid Embolization

UAE for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroid was first described by
Ravina et al.38 in 1995. Over the past decade, UAE has been increasingly
used, and because of its efficacy and safety, it was established as an
alternative to surgery as standard treatment.
39–42
The use of an embolic
material for UAE has been evaluated, and spherical embolic materials such as
Embosphere are the standard in countries where access to them is
feasible.
43,44
GS has been used as an alternative in countries where these
materials are either not accessible or not preferred for cost-saving reasons.
Katsumori et al.
45,46
first described a large case series of UAE with GS with
favorable mid- and long-term outcomes in terms of symptom improvement in
96% of patients at 1 year, 94.5% at 2 years, and 89.5% at 5 years. A
prospective multicenter study by Sone et al.47 demonstrated a similar
outcome at 1 year with an improvement in menorrhagia in 90% of patients,
bulk symptom in 76%, and pelvic pain in 96%. Depending on the situation,
the use of GS as an alternative embolic material for UAE can be considered.
TIPS AND TRICKS
• GS is applicable to a wide range of disease entities.
• GS is flexible in size depending on the preparation technique.
Ultimately, this will determine the level of occlusion with the target
vasculature.

POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS
There have been two reports of rare anaphylactic reactions during surgical
use of GS.
48,49
To date, only one study demonstrated anaphylaxis presumably
caused by GS during TACE with cisplatin and GS, without contrast
material.50 Additional complications include nontarget embolization,
ischemia, infection, and postembolization syndrome; however, these are
related to the organ and vascular bed being targeted for embolization and are
not specific to GS.
REFERENCES
1. Jenkins HP, Janda R. Studies on the use of gelatin sponge or foam as an
hemostatic agent in experimental liver resections and injuries to large
veins. Ann Surg. 1946;124:952–961.
2. Jenkins HP, Janda R, Clarke J. Clinical and experimental observations
on the use of gelatin sponge or foam. Surgery. 1946;20:124–132.
3. Ishimori S, Hattori M, Shibata Y, et al. Treatment of carotid-cavernous
fistula by gelfoam embolization. J Neurosurg. 1967;27:315–319.
4. Sato M, Yamada R. Experimental and clinical studies on the hepatic
artery embolization for treatment of hepatoma. J Jpn Radiol Soc.
1983;43:977–1005.
5. Loffroy R, Guiu B, Cercueil JP, et al. Endovascular therapeutic
embolisation: an overview of occluding agents and their effects on
embolised tissues. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2009;7:250–263.
6. Blaine G. Absorbable gelatin sponge in experimental surgery. Lancet.
1951;2:427–429.
7. Kawano H, Arakawa S, Satoh O, et al. Foreign body granulomatous
change from absorbable gelatin sponge and microcoil embolization after
a guidewire-induced perforation in the distal coronary artery. Intern
Med. 2010;49:1871–1874.
8. Barth KH, Strandberg JD, White RI Jr. Long term follow-up of
transcatheter embolization with autologous clot, oxycel and gelfoam in

domestic swine. Invest Radiol. 1977;12:273–280.
9. Louail B, Sapoval M, Bonneau M, et al. A new porcine sponge material
for temporary embolization: an experimental short-term pilot study in
swine. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:826–831.
embolization with calibrated resorbable microspheres versus hand-cut
gelatin sponge particles in a porcine kidney model. J Vasc Interv Radiol.
2013;24:1391–1398.
of uterine artery: changes with embolization using gelatin sponge
particles alone for fibroids. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:398–
404.
transfemoral renal artery occlusion in patients with renal carcinoma.
Preliminary report. Urology. 1975;6:6–10.
abdominal, retroperitoneal, and pelvic hemorrhage. Radiology.
1980;136:337–344.
artery embolization: an experimental study of intra-arterial distribution,
uterine necrosis, and inflammation in a porcine model. Cardiovasc
Intervent Radiol. 2010;33:1001–1008.
massive eosinophilic leukocyte infiltration and transient peripheral
eosinophilia subsequent to transarterial embolization therapy with a
gelatin sponge. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1991;41:618–622.
for hepatic arterial embolization—investigation of passage through
current microcatheters [in Japanese]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho.
2007;34:59–64.
arterial embolization; investigation of the size distribution and
fragmentation before and after microcatheter passage [in Japanese]. Gan

To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009;36:437–442.
differences with preparation method. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
2006;29:1077–1083.
IVR: Intervent Radiol. 2007;22:469–471.
gelatin sponge particle size after canine hepatic artery embolization.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997;20:50–53.
miniature pig: a study of arterial size and the distribution of embolic
materials [in Japanese]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi.
2005;65:452–454.
transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular
carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–1171.
chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with
unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2002;359:1734–1739.
hepatocellular carcinoma: which technique is more effective? A
systematic review of cohort and randomized studies. Cardiovasc
Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:6–25.
unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves
survival. Hepatology. 2003;37:429–442.
for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. Radiology. 2002;224:47–54.
120 patients with unresectable hepatoma. Radiology. 1983;148:397–401.

chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology.
1989;170:783–786.
arterial embolization using lipiodol mixed with an anticancer drug and
Gelfoam particles for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol. 1990;13:140–145.
chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian
cooperative study between Japan and Korea. J Vasc Interv Radiol.
2013;24:490–500.
options for interstitial treatments and intravascular approaches:
superselective TACE using iodized oil for HCC: rationale, technique and
outcome. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:407–409.
bleeding: a new approach to hemostasis through angiographic arterial
embolization. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;54:361–365.
embolisation for the treatment of life-threatening post-partum
haemorrhage in a large population. PloS One. 2008;3:e3819.
French clinical practice recommendations in embolization in postpartum
and post-abortion hemorrhage: study of 48 cases. J Perinat Med.
2007;35:532–537.
complications: indications, technique, and methods for minimizing
radiation exposure. Radiographics. 2012;32:255–274.
superselective embolization for severe postpartum hemorrhage: a
retrospective review of 36 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.
2004;27:344–348.
embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to

genital tract injury. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:160–163.
to treat uterine myomata. Lancet. 1995;346:671–672.
for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a randomized controlled trial and a
meta-analysis of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1407–
1413.
embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine
fibroids: 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2010;203:105.e1–105.e13.
fibroids: treatment with uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy—
results from the randomized clinical Embolisation versus Hysterectomy
(EMMY) Trial. Radiology. 2008;246:823–832.
symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2012;5:CD005073.
acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for
leiomyomas: results of a limited randomized comparative study. J Vasc
Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1431–1437.
acryl gelatin microspheres for uterine artery embolization for
leiomyomas: results of a randomized comparative study. J Vasc Interv
Radiol. 2004;15:793–800.
using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic uterine fibroids:
midterm results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:135–139.
artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic
fibroids. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:848–854.

uterine artery embolization with gelatin sponge for symptomatic uterine
leiomyomata: Japan Interventional Radiology in Oncology Study Group
study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:1665–1671.
gelatin in topical hemostatic agents during anterior spinal fusion: a case
report. Spine J. 2012;12:e1–e6.
induced by the gelatin component of thrombin-soaked gelfoam in a
pediatric patient. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108:209–210.
porous gelatin sponge during transarterial chemoembolization.
Fukushima J IVR. 2013;17:24.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
