Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4533_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
27 Мб
Скачать
380
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Kerkfeld
24.2.2 Pathological Diculties
Infants with craniofacial abnormalities (CLP, branchial arch diseases, syndromic craniosynos­toses, others) suffer from many problems regard­ing feeding. As mentioned before, lips should seal the nipple while the palate grants stability and delivers the foundation for a functional com­pression of the nipple with the collaboration of the tongue. Furthermore, it is necessary that infants are able to breathe during feeding. Decient lips and/or palates or a compromised airway (Fig. 24.2) have different occurrences. Their effects for feeding and sucking need to be declared individually [14, 15].
24.2.2.1 Clefts
Cleft Lip
Infants with a cleft lip are not able to form a labial seal; therefore, there is less negative pressure built up while sucking. However, in general, the disadvantage is not incisive in the clinical picture
Fig. 24.2 CBCT in a median view
of isolated cleft lips, because the gap is often sealed by the breast or the bottle [
16].
Cleft Lip andAlveolar Process
Due to combined insufciencies of the lips and alveolar process, the act of sucking is much more difcult. The cleft lip decreases the buildup of negative pressure. In addition, a gap in the osse­ous structures of the alveolar process prevents a sufcient compression of the nipple. As a conse­quence, the infant tries to compensate the physi­cal disabilities by a more distinctive elevation of the mandible. Due to excessive work during the act of sucking, the infants are quickly exhausted. Most of the infants with cleft lip and alveolar pro­cess have to be bottle-fed, in addition to the breast, to guarantee an adequate uptake of calo­ries per day.
Cleft Palate
The clinical patterns of cleft palates can be divided into isolated cleft hard palates, submu­cous cleft palates, or clefts including the soft palate.
In patients with cleft hard palates, the com-
pression and stability of the nipple is restricted. However, the sealing of the nipple is not affected. Like the clinical picture of cleft lip and alveolus, the infant has to afford an increased amount of physical work to gain milk and suffers from fatigue.
In patients with submucous cleft palates, the
velopharyngeal valve is incomplete. The submu­cous gap as well leads to reduced negative pres­sure while sucking, but in most patients, breastfeeding does not seem to be limited by the malformation.
Cleft soft palates are associated with the clini-
cal picture of a remaining gap between the oral and nasal cavity. During the act of sucking, a steady airow lls the oral cavity with gas. Swallowing milk in combination with air leads to an early satiation, even though the caloric uptake is not sufcient. The swallowing of air can lead to massive burping and even emesis. The remaining gap between the two cavities can also cause a regurgitation of the milk through the nose. Milk in the infant’s nose inhibits physiological
24 Feeding andBreathing Aspects inInfants withCraniofacial Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
381
breathing; in consequence, the infant is not able to take a breath during the act of swallowing. Most of the time, the tongue of the infants, in reection, is able to close minor clefts of the soft palate while being fed. Depending on the extent of the soft palate cleft, breastfeeding is possible most of the time. However, children with major clefts of the soft palate cannot be breastfed [15].
Cleft Lip andPalate
All the deciencies and their effects on feeding and sucking convene in the combined pathology of cleft lip and palate (Fig.24.3). The difculties mentioned occur at the same time, and therefore, breastfeeding infants with cleft lip and palate is most likely not possible [17].
In conclusion, the feeding limitations lead to fatigue and a limited caloric intake. The impact of the limitations always depends on the clinical picture and the extension and type of the cleft.
24.2.2.2 Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
Oral dysphagia arises commonly from diseases and malformations of the mouth or throat, such as clefts or craniofacial syndromes. Cricopharyngeal dysphagia cannot be discriminated clinically from oropharyngeal dysphagia and is therefore assigned in the same category.
Infants with oropharyngeal dysphagia tend to have a leak of saliva or bolus outside of the mouth and are most likely not skilled in initiating or ter­minating the act of swallowing. In addition, the accumulation of liquids in the pharynx leads to choking, coughing, and postnasal regurgitation.
Affected infants often show symptoms of apnea and cyanosis.
In children, a slurred speech as well as speech defects can reveal an insufcient closure of the soft palate or deciencies of the pharyngeal mus­cles. Even after a successful operation of the cleft a speaking defect can remain, but logopedics assist before and after [
18, 19].
24.2.2.3 Syndromes withCraniofacial
Anomalies
Many infants with syndromes suffer from feed­ing issues. Some syndromic groups display spe­cial features of feeding difculties.
Pierre Robin Sequence (CLP Group)
Infants with Pierre Robin sequence suffer from micrognathia, which causes glossoptosis accom­panied by obstruction of the airway. In addi­tion, many infants appear with cleft palate. All named characteristics have to be differentiated separately in the context of breastfeeding difficulties.
Micrognathia leads to an incongruity between the upper jaw and the mandible. Therefore, the infant is not able to compress the nipple appropri­ately. This drawback is accompanied by a limited stability of the nipple. A sufcient milk transfer from the anterior part of the tongue to the oro­pharynx is mostly not possible due to the glos­soptosis. In addition, the cleft palate leads to the difculties mentioned above, such as an insuf­cient lip seal and a reduced compression of the nipple. Furthermore, the upper airway is not only obstructed due to the nasal regurgitation but also by the retracted tongue [20].
All these limitations lead to a frustrating feed­ing process with an early fatigue accompanied by breathing difculties leading to apneas.
Fig. 24.3 Clefts
Goldenhar Syndrome (Branchial Arch Disease Group)
The hypoplasia of the craniofacial skeleton and the masticatory muscles leads to feeding issues [21]. The prevalence of feeding difculties in Goldenhar infants is between 42% [22] and 83% [23]. Especially the sucking efciency is decreased by a restricted excursion of the
382
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Kerkfeld
mandible arch because of the hypoplasia. Additionally, the weakness of the N. facialis lim­its the cheek and lip movements, which play an important role in the physiological mechanism of sucking. Malformations of the tongue may dis­rupt a normal sucking behavior as well. Besides the clinical picture of the craniofacial malforma­tions, patients with Goldenhar syndrome as well suffer from gastrointestinal malformations and heart failures that might aggravate the feeding issues as well [2]. Feeding difculties in Goldenhar infants can only be treated with a nasogastric tube that ensures continuous feeding [2426].
Apert Syndrome (Syndromic Craniosynostosis Group)
Infants with Apert syndrome suffer from multisu­ture craniosynostosis and a retrusion of the mid­face. The clinical picture typically appears with syndactyly of the second to fourth digits as well. Nearly all infants show a coronal craniosynosto­sis and a majority also present synostosis of the sagittal and lambdoidal sutures. The midface is both retruded and hypoplastic. Some also show cleft palates.
Feeding difculties are often observed in infants with Apert syndrome. Besides the cleft­related problems previously described, a con­striction of the posterior nasal aperture or the nasal meatus may lead to an interrupted sucking by often breathing through an opened mouth. This behavior can be mistaken for primary feed­ing issues.
24.2.3 Social-Emotional Interactions
Besides the technical aspects of feeding infants with craniofacial malformations, the social­emotional interactions between parents and infant need to be given attention. Infants with clefts often show a decreased readiness to be fed. In comparison to not affected infants, they show overall fewer positive emotions before and dur­ing the feeding, even though there is no differ­ence in the behavior of the mothers.
It is necessary to pay attention on both aspects, the physiological (feeding technique) and the psychological (social interactions). Prenatal medical advices can help parents to learn about the technical aspects of feeding and the individ­ual anatomic issues, so that they can probably focus on the social demands and the enjoyment with their newborn [ feeding often leads parents to a feeling of frustra­tion and anxiety.
17, 27]. Severely impaired
24.2.4 Management
Feeding and swallowing issues occurring con­genitally and remaining throughout the whole life are very common problems in relation to cra­niofacial malformations. Dysphagia can be divided into oral and pharyngeal pathologies. Most clinical cases mentioned before are oral pathologies caused by craniofacial anomalies. Craniofacial anomalies are very individual and lead to different types and extents of feeding issues. Pharyngeal pathologies can compound the feeding issues. Some disturbances are even caused neurologically during pregnancy and lead to neurological disorders with altered hindbrain. These malfunctions can also provide craniofacial malformations and/or altered development of cranial nerves in addition to the previously described pathogenesis of the syndromes.
To nd the best support for feeding an affected infant, it is necessary to obtain a full medical his­tory, a good clinical examination, including objective physiological skills, and a critical investigation of the individual feeding process. To achieve objective outcomes of the swallow­ing, instrument-based diagnostics can be used. The ber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swal­lowing reveals the function of the laryngeal struc­tures. A barium swallow study is able to reveal even more phases of swallowing: the oral, the pharyngeal, and the esophageal phase.
In a differential diagnosis approach, besides the craniofacial malformation due to syndromes, pediatric dysphagias on the basis of disrupted hindbrain patterning have to be kept in mind.
24 Feeding andBreathing Aspects inInfants withCraniofacial Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
383
24.2.4.1 Medical History
A detailed medical history delivers many impor­tant details about the individual feeding issue. Therefore, parents need to describe the issues from their point of view regarding the overall problems, such as the regularities and amount of time necessary to feed the infant and the individ­ual amount of milk swallowed. The mother’s milk and/or the nutritional supplements and its composition the infant receives have to be exam­ined, to differentiate the uptake and number of calories and also the structure of the liquid, regarding the viscosity. It has to be identied how the infant is regularly fed, if there is only breast­or bottle-feeding, or a combination of both.
24.2.4.2 Observation
In addition to the observation of the act of swal­lowing, it is important to look wisely at the phase of resting and especially pay attention on the interaction between the feeder and the infant. Important subjects are the posture of the infant, the airway (stridor, phases of apnea, position of the chest), swallowing of saliva, drooling, and coughing.
A comparison of the resting phase and the act of swallowing helps to understand the individual issues of the infant. It is important to examine how the physiological parameters change and to pay attention on the oral, pharyngeal, and esoph­ageal phase of swallowing. Potential obstacles have to be spotted and eliminated.
24.2.4.3 Examination
Clinical Examination
First of all, vital parameters (pO2, heart rate, breathing rate) and the oral status need to be examined. Some minor obstacles can be identi­ed and eliminated directly. Depending on the situation, it can be helpful to decrease the air intake during the act of swallowing to correct the nasal regurgitation. A simple modication of the position of the infant during feeding can decrease the unwanted airow. Variances in the viscosities of the bottle liquid or the amount of the milk/liq­uid ow and an individual support during milk intake can enhance the situation.
Instrumental Examination
Instrumental examination can show hidden obstacles or consolidate present diagnoses. The ber-optic endoscopic evaluation and the modi­ed barium swallow study can both detect the swallowing pattern and the individual restric­tions. The evaluation of the anatomic and physi­ological circumstances of the swallowing might detect possibilities to advance or modify the feeding process. Modications can be different postures, other viscosities of the exposed liq­uids, and a variation of the dosage forms (e.g., breastfeeding, bottle-feeding, cup-feeding, spoon-feeding).
Both clinical methods mentioned above have advantages and disadvantages; in some cases, the endoscopic evaluation, in other cases the barium swallow method, or sometimes a combination of both techniques can be clinically indicated.
Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation ofSwallowing
The endoscopic technique (Fig. direct view on laryngeal structures and helps to determine the laryngeal function. It is always preferable to the barium swallow, because in this direct technique there is no application of radio­active technology. In addition, the advantage of the endoscopic method is the practicability. There is no radiology department needed to execute the examination [28, 29].
Modied Barium Swallow Study
Video: https://www.shutterstock.com/de/video/clip-
19,831,825-x-rays-esophagus- contrast- barium
The barium swallow study (Fig.24.5) offers the way to examine the oropharyngeal swallow­ing pattern. This technique convinces by its clear view that might be masked in endoscopic methods by the bolus. Globus sensations, crico­pharyngeal malfunctions, and unspecic dis­comforts can be evaluated better. Another advantage is the high acceptance rate in infants that sometimes do not tolerate the endoscopic procedure. A disadvantage is the application of radioactive emission and the necessity to coop­erate with a specialized radiology department [30].
24.4) obtains a
384
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 24.4 Fiber-optic
investigation. (Reprinted from: a katz/
Shutterstock.com with
permission)
V. Kerkfeld
24.2.5 Treatment
Some exercises can be adopted to improve the feeding procedure. First of all, the posture of both the feeder and the infant should be stabilized in an upright position.
In cases of cleft lips, the breast and/or nipple should seal the oral cavity to the outside; some­times the mother can manage a closure by sup­porting the breast/nipple in a specic angle to the infant’s mouth. The mandible can be stabilized as well so that a sufcient closure of the mouth can be granted. Most children with cleft palates do not benet from synthetic obturators.
24.2.6 Conclusion
There is a high variance on feeding and sucking abilities in infants with craniofacial malforma­tions. Besides the overall medical diagnosis, indi­vidual physiological and anatomic structures can be manifested in different extents. The innate demand on nutrition can differ to the infant’s competence to ingest a certain amount of milk. The feeding issues can be determined by obser­vation and mechanical techniques for an individ­ual support of the feeding procedure. The overarching goal is to provide an adequate nutri-
tional uptake and to guarantee a seasonable phys­iological development of the child.
24.3 Breathing
24.3.1 General Aspects
Many infants with craniofacial malformations appear to have a disordered breathing while sleeping to a various extent. Sleep disordered breathing can be divided into obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), central sleep apnea, and sleep-related hypoventilation. There are many factors that inuence breathing and lead to sleep disordered breathing. Midface hypoplasia comes along with constrictions of the posterior nasal aperture or the nasal meatus. For example, infants with Pierre Robin sequence show glos­soptosis that obstructs the oropharynx. In conclu­sion, all disturbances reduce the patency of the upper airway and may lead to breathing difculties.
24.3.1.1 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Most infants with craniofacial malformations suffer from a diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The prevalence is 67% [31].
24 Feeding andBreathing Aspects inInfants withCraniofacial Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 24.5 Barium
swallow. (Reprinted from top: April stock/
Shutterstock.com,
bottom: whitetherock photo/Shutterstock.com with permission)
385
The infants tend to have a partial or temporarily complete obstruction of the upper airway that affects the breathing as well as the sleeping pat­tern [32]. In addition, the OSAS causes many dis­eases such as cardiovascular and neurological disorders [3235]. Obstructive sleep apnea is
characterized by partial or complete interruption of airow resulting in a temporarily decreasing pO2 [36]. The extent of the malfunction depends on the patency of the upper airways, which is often affected in children with craniofacial mal­formations [37]. Hypoplasia of the midface,
386
https://t.me/medicina_free
V. Kerkfeld
especially micrognathia, and glossoptosis are well-known risk factors for breathing issues. Besides, the high incidence of tonsillar and ade­noidal encroachment is also a form of restriction for breathing. However, the etiology and patho­genesis are determined by many factors.
24.3.2 Pathological Diculties
24.3.2.1 Craniosynostosis
Many syndromes are accompanied by craniosyn­ostoses such as Pfeiffer, Apert, Crouzon, Muenke, Saethre-Chotzen, and Carpenter. The prevalence of those syndrome-affected infants is 68% [38] to 87% [39]. Etiologically a mutation of the FGFR gene causes the premature fusion of sutures. Breathing restrictions tend to be very variable due to the different manifestations of the malformations.
OSAS inPatients withCraniosynostosis
As mentioned before, OSAS is often caused by hypoplasia of the midface. Therefore, patients mostly breathe by mouth and tend to snore, which may result in sleep apnea symptoms [40, 41].
In addition, craniosynostoses can provoke an increased intracranial pressure due to cranial dis­proportions, pathological venous drain, and an increased amount of brain liquor (hydrocepha­lus). However, intracranial pressure is also affected by an increased pCO
that occurs due to
2
obstructive sleep apnea and its effects on the blood pressure. In consequence, the cerebral per­fusion is different [4245]. It is recommended to screen children with syndromes on a regular basis every year by polysomnography to detect OSAS [46].
Infants with craniosynostosis and OSAS ben­et from a nasopharyngeal airway that circum­vents the obstruction.
Central Apneas inPatients withCraniosynostosis
Infants with craniosynostosis also suffer from central apneas. The pathogenesis is not well known, but pressure on the respiratory center is
discussed. Etiologically a Chiari malformation can cause this appearance [
47]; therefore, patients
with Crouzon or Pfeiffer syndrome often occur with this malformation [48]. However, Chiari malformations are rarely seen in patients with Apert syndrome [49]. In the end, breathing issues lead to developmental disturbances, minor qual­ity of life, and behavior problems [50].
24.3.2.2 Clefts
Many syndromes are accompanied by clefts such as Down, Pierre Robin, and Treacher Collins. However, 70% of patients occur with isolated clefts without other comorbidities [51].
There is a higher incidence in children with clefts to suffer from OSAS.Pharyngeal airways are smaller and the craniofacial relation differs to those of healthy infants. Cleft palates affect the oropharyngeal muscles that aggravate the speech and the act of swallowing and inuence the patency of the airway [52]. Sixty-nine percent of infants with isolated lip and cleft palates suffer from sleep apnea [53]. Facial dimensions such as the length of the mandible and the height of the face are important aspects for the extent of obstructive sleep apnea [54].
Surgical treatment aims to improve the velo­pharyngeal function and to restrict the unwanted nasal airway [55]. In surgery, the intent is to reduce the space between the soft palate and the posterior pharynx [56]. The surgical treatment itself is able to induce obstructive sleep apnea as a complication that might result to the use of CPAP [57].
24.3.2.3 Syndromes withCraniofacial
Anomalies
Many syndromes with craniofacial anomalies result in breathing issues.
Pierre Robin Sequence
Patients with Pierre Robin sequence occur with the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and resulting airway obstruction. Pierre Robin him­self declared the drop of the base of the tongue as a disturbance of the nasopharyngeal airway [58]. The sequence is also often accompanied by cleft
24 Feeding andBreathing Aspects inInfants withCraniofacial Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
387
palates. It is commonly assumed that the micro­gnathia causes a dislocation of the tongue to an upper and posterior direction medially between the two parts of the developing palates during pregnancy. This irregular development results in a U-shaped cleft [59].
For a long time, practitioners thought of glos­soptosis to be responsible for obstructive sleep apnea in infants with Pierre Robin sequence. However, endoscopic procedures of the naso­pharynx revealed a multifactorial genesis: some patients show that the base of the tongue presses the soft palate against the posterior pharynx, while some suffer from the lateral pharynges coming close to each other and others occur with a combination of both, resulting in a circumfer­ential constriction of the pharynx [60]. In addi­tion, maxillary hypoplasia plays another important part in the genesis of OSAS [61]. Eighty-ve percent of infants with Pierre Robin sequence occur with OSAS [62].
Children with Pierre Robin sequence should be screened every year to detect OSAS.This is very important due to the high incidence of sleep apnea in patients with Pierre Robin sequence. In addition, usual symptoms are often veiled, such as snoring which is not represented in every case or inadequate motions of the chest and abdomen during sleep that might be misunderstood by parents.
Achondroplasia
Patients with achondroplasia occur with macro­cephaly and hypoplasia of the midface [63]. Because of the malformation, 54% of affected children have OSAS [64].
Down Syndrome
Patients with Down syndrome occur with hypo­plasia of the midface and are associated to clefts and obesity [65]. Therefore, a majority of the affected children (80%) have OSAS [66].
Treacher Collins Syndrome
Infants suffering from Treacher Collins syn­drome often show a minor patency of airways resulting in breathing issues. Many patients need to be tracheostomized to ensure a steady airow
to grant a sufcient oxygenation. Surgical inter­ventions on the cleft palates might affect the air­ways and aggravate the breathing issues.
Infants with Treacher Collins occur with hypoplasia of the viscerocranium, cleft palates, malformation of the ears, pharyngeal hypoplasia, and various other symptoms [67]. Fifty-four per­cent of children with Treacher Collins syndrome suffer from obstructive sleep apnea [68]. Studies supported by endoscopic procedure of the naso­pharynx show multifactorial genesis by many different anatomic variations between the nasal septum and the trachea. However, most obstruc­tive malformations can be found in the orophar­ynx. The diversity of obstructions of the upper airway leads to the recommendation to use an endoscopic technique for diagnosis [69].
Goldenhar Syndrome
Many children suffering from Goldenhar syn­drome are at risk of OSAS.The prevalence lays between 7% and 67% [70, 71]. Primarily, the hypoplasia of the mandible causes the breathing issue similar to the pathogenesis of OSAS in chil­dren with Pierre Robin sequence and Treacher Collins syndrome [70, 72]. The hypoplasia causes minor patency in the oropharynx and therefore hinders a physiological airow.
24.3.3 Management
The treatment of breathing issues, especially OSAS, contains CPAP, tracheostomy (Fig.24.6), and surgi­cal intervention. In many cases, surgical treatment in even more than just one part of the nasopharyn­geal airway becomes necessary. However, it is important to determine which intervention suits the infant. Some may benet more from CPAP, while others prot from tracheotomy [73].
All infants with severe craniofacial malforma­tions should be supervised by overnight poly­somnography in order to detect (hidden) OSAS [74]. Pulsoximetry is a number-two choice due to its lower sensitivity [75]. To evaluate the individ­ual extent of apnea and hypopnea phases, the apnea-hypopnea index counts the episodes of those events per hour.
388
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 24.6
Tracheostomy
Fig. 24.7 Continuous
positive airway pressure (CPAP). (Reprinted from JPC-PROD/
Shutterstock.com with
permission)
V. Kerkfeld
24.3.4 Treatment
There are many ways to handle OSAS, and the correct treatment needs to be detected individu­ally for every infant. Many practitioners recom­mend prone position in non-severe extents of sleep-related breathing difculties. Besides, there are other nonsurgical treatment approaches like nasopharyngeal airway tubes or continuous posi­tive airway pressure (CPAP) (Fig.24.7). In addi­tion, another nonsurgical treatment is the use of
Tübingen palatal plate (TPP) (Fig.24.8) in more severe cases. TPP is an intraoral orthodontic pal­atal appliance with a posterior extension that leads the tongue in an anterior direction. This ensures patency of the upper airway and enhances breathing. internal treatments may contain in dis­tinct cases weight-loss and anti-inammatory drugs, while other infants benet from an orth­odontic intervention with removable appliances for a rapid maxillary expansion. Depending on the situation, a surgical operation can be helpful
24 Feeding andBreathing Aspects inInfants withCraniofacial Malformations
https://t.me/medicina_free
formed children. The most common breathing disorder is the OSAS, while central apneas should not be disregarded especially in popula­tion of infants with craniosynostosis. Besides facial and nasopharyngeal malformations like hypoplasia of the midface and glossoptosis, de­cient upper airways due to oropharyngeal dys­functions can cause sleep apneas. Infants benet from an abdominal position, nasopharyngeal air­way bypassing the obstruction, surgical proce­dures, and as well CPAP in order to suffer less from sleep apneas.In infants with therapy-refrac­tory sleep apneas, tracheotomy might be evalu­ated as an ultima ratio.
24.4 Case Report
The strong interrelation between breathing and feeding becomes obvious by a closer inspection of an infant with a syndromic disease. Therefore, a case report is presented in the following.
389
Fig. 24.8 Tübingen palatal plate (TPP)
to distract the mandible or to eliminate obstruc­tions in the upper airway. Those patients suffer from hypoplasia of the mandible. Therefore, a surgical distraction of the mandible can cure or attenuate the breathing issues.
24.3.5 Conclusion
Every infant with craniofacial malformation should be screened for sleep-related breathing disorders due to the high prevalence in mal-
24.4.1 Initial Situation
An infant with Pfeiffer syndrome appears in a desolate state (Fig.24.9). Overall, he/she is not able to swallow adequately and struggles for air. Because of the feeding and breathing issues, it is dystrophic and underdeveloped. Besides, the infant occurs with craniosynostosis and hydro­cephalus accompanied by eye proptosis (Fig. 24.10). However, it lacks the common appearance of syndactyly that is observed in other patients affected by Pfeiffer syndrome.
24.4.2 Treatment
24.4.2.1 Breathing Management
First of all, proper breathing needed to be ensured. Initially, an endoscopic examination (Fig.24.11) was performed due to detect constriction of the upper airway. A nasal intubation followed (Fig. 24.12). However, this procedure was not able to grant breathing sufciently. Therefore, a modied Tübingen palatal plate with an endotra-