Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5352_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
28 Мб
Скачать
262 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
R
1
R
2
R
1
R
2
i) Al
R
3
https://t.me/med1917
created a suitable intermediate, through C–N bond cleavage. The unstable intermediate then suffered the C–C bond ssion to form the unsaturated compound (Scheme 8.52).
8.3.6 Use of β-Lactams as Scaffold
The diverse scaffolding role of β-lactams is presented here (Scheme 8.53). This is possible for all the possible reactive sites around the ring.
8.3.7 β-Lactam as a Molecular Lock
Like many other activities, β-lactam can serve as a molecular lock.46 A β-lactam-fused bis-propargylic sulfone was synthesized successfully by an oxidation reaction, and this failed to isomerize to the stable allenic sulfone. Similar propargyl to allene derivative isomerization was possible in some compounds proving the role of β-lactam as a molecular lock. An opening of β-lactam ring to form an allene com­pound and subsequent DNA damage were targeted (Scheme 8.54).
Ban et al.47 reported the synthesis of fused enediyne β-lactam. The ability of the ring to act as a molecular lock was demonstrated because it prevented the enediyne to undergo Bergman cyclization.47 A β-lactam-fused system with an in-built nucleophilic handle was also developed. In the presence of acid, the β-lactam ring was opened by an intramolecular nucleophilic reaction to produce bicyclic reactive enediyne. This assisted to activate the annelated ten-membered ring (Scheme 8.55).
The synthesis of 1,4-fused β-lactam-based enediyne was reported.48 In comparison to other ten-mem­bered enediynes, β-lactam-fused enediyne surprisingly had a higher locking ability (Scheme 8.56).
8.3.8 Strategies Toward Fused β-Lactam Enediynes
Three approaches were studied for the synthesis of β-lactam-fused enediynes. These included the forma­tion of enediyne onto a β-lactam system (path a),49 formation of β-lactam onto an enediyne system50 (path b), and formation of both the enediyne and β-lactam systems51 (path c) (Schemes 8.57, 8.58, and 8.59).
1
i)
N
3
R
O
H2Cl; ii) AlEt2Cl.
SCHEME 8.52 Synthesis of disubstituted alkene.
X
N
O
Types of systems in which -lactam acts as a scaffold
N
R
1
R
R
N
3
R
X
NR
O
ii)
3
2
Al
NR
O
R
1
R
X
X
+
N
2
R
2
R
N
Al
3
R
NR
O
Al
SCHEME 8.53 Aspects of β-lactam as scaffold.
263Beta-Lactams as Synthons for Diverse Heterocycles
O
O
O
OH
H
H
https://t.me/med1917
O
O
O
O
S
i)
O
N
O
S
S
+
O
N
O
(NOT OBTAINED) O
O
S
C
C
O
N
O
O
S
S
O
O
O
O
S
C
C
O
S
i)
O
O
O O
CSC
+
O
O
O
SCHEME 8.54 β-Lactam ring prevents allene isomerization.
i)
O
O
H
CO
3
O
H3N
CO
3
HN
O
N
O
OH
N
DNA
OH
pH
+
O
=
7
H
CO
3
O
.
H
CO
3
O
O
H2N
N H
N
HN
OH
OH
O
H
3
H
i) = mCPBA
CO
N
O
H2N
CO
3
HN
O
N H
OH
O
O
.
SCHEME 8.55 Using β-lactam to prevent cyclization in enediynes.
8.3.9 β-Lactam Nucleobase Chimeras
The preparation of diverse cis- and trans-β-lactam nucleobase chimeras from the propargyl nucleobase system and diphenyl nitrone was reported.52 The yield of nucleobase chimeric compounds was improved via the formation of in situ Cu (I) acetylide from Cu(OAc)2 and L-ascorbate (Scheme 8.60).
8.3.10 Conformationally Restricted β-Lactam Peptides
A successful synthesis of scaffolds to induce β-turns is an important area of research. An efcient turn mimetic requires alteration of native peptide structure. The crucial objective was to insert a
264 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
O
O
O
HN
Ph
H
H
https://t.me/med1917
N
SCHEME 8.56 Enediyne-fused β-lactams.
i) ii)
NH
HO
A
O
Cl
NH
OH
i) A, Pd(PPh
)4, CuI; ii) MsCl, NEt3; iii) K2CO3, DMF
3
SCHEME 8.57 Pathway “a” toward β-lactam-based enediynes.
EtOOC
i)
N
O
i) ClCOCH
COOEt, NEt3; ii) Tosylazide; iii) Rh2(OAc)4.
2
N
O
NH
O
iii)
N
O
OMs
EtOOC
ii)
N
2
_
N
O
iii)
O
N
EtOOC
SCHEME 8.58 Pathway “b” toward β-lactam-based enediynes.
n
O
O
N
i)
Ph
i) CuI, Et3N.
OH
O
N
i)
Ph
SCHEME 8.59 Pathway “c” toward β-lactam-based enediynes.
O
n
O
N
H
n = 0, 1
H
O
n
O
N
OH
H
H
Ph
H
O
N
Ph
O
N
Ph
265Beta-Lactams as Synthons for Diverse Heterocycles
H
O
3
O
O
O
O
https://t.me/med1917
NN
N
2
SCHEME 8.60 Synthesis of β-lactam nucleobase chimera.
N
N
Ph
N
Ph
1
H
O
R
N H
Maximum backbone
constraint
(random

O
Me
B
O
i) CuI,Et
H N
-turn)
HN
i)
+
N, A, DMF.
O
N H
N
Ph
Ph
Minimum
(CH
HN
HN
O
B
N
O
structure
change
+ HN CH2)
1
R
O
O
O
N
Ph
N
O
Ph
A
N
N
H
SCHEME 8.61 Energy-minimized structure, X-ray structure, and structural parameters in agreement with β-turn peptidomimetics.
1
R
HN
SCHEME 8.62 Design of β-turn mimetic.
β-turn-inducing element, which can force the peptide backbone to participate in intramolecular H-bonds between amino acids. Palomo et al.53 showed an efcient β-turn mimetic using a 1,3-disbstituted β-lactam
H
2
R
N
O
O
NOH
1
R
N
N
O
NOH
1
R
N
N
H
O
N
as the backbone. They synthesized pseudopeptides containing optically active β-amino-β-lactam frag­ments. The geometries of the compounds were proved by X-ray crystallography in the solid state. It was shown that the alkylamino substitution pattern of β-lactam rings was placed as residues in tetrapeptide systems. The syn-disubstitution did not create a stabilization, while anti-disubstitution was suitable with β-turn formation. The N- and C-terminal residues in tetrapeptide models had minimum effects (Scheme
8.61).
The synthesis of azetidinyl β-lactam-based peptides54 was reported. The trans-disubstituted β-lactam demonstrated an intramolecularly H-bonded structure.80 The cis-isomers did not demonstrate any well-dened intramolecular H-bonding, indicating their conformational exibility. The cis- and trans­β-lactam tripeptides were synthesized via Kinugasa reaction using propargyl-substituted ethyl pyroglu- tamate and diphenylnitrone as the starting compounds (Schemes 8.62 and 8.63).
266 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
O
2
3
O
R
2
Et
2
https://t.me/med1917
Ph
N H
Ph
2
2
Ph
Ph
i)
Et
H
O
O
iv)
H N
CO2CHPh
O
Ph
CO
N
O
NHPh
N
Ph
N
O
Ph
2
O
O
i) KOH, TBAB, propargyl bromide, THF; ii) Et
CO
N H
CO
N
N
O
iv)
O
N
N
O
ii)
Et
2
O
N
O
H3N
CO2CHPh
B
Ph
HPh
N
Ph
O
A
N, CuI, A, CH3CN; iii) LiOH, THF-H2O; iii) EDC.HCl, B, HOBt, DMAP.
CO
N
Ph
2
Ph
+
O
Et
2
N
O
R R = H
O
N
O
O
N
O
=
CO
N
O
O
N
+
R
O
2
Ph
Ph
Et
N H
Ph
N
Ph
N H
Ph
Ph
N
O
iii)
H N
O
+
H N
CO2CHPh
O
Ph
R
CO
2
Ph
N
Ph
=
R
Et
R = H
CO2CHPh
Ph
2
SCHEME 8.63 Synthesis of cis- and trans-peptides.
1
R
O
1
N
S
Ph
O
R
1
ClOC
R
1
COCl
R
R
O
1
1
i) R
i)
2
NH
O
O
Et
N
2
R
R
1
R
1
O
N
O
R
O
N
2
R
SCHEME 8.64 4-Oxo-β-lactam as HLE inhibitor.
8.3.11 4 -Oxo - β-Lactams as Scaffolds for Elastase Inhibitors
Suitably substituted β-lactams were used as inhibitors for human leucocyte elastase (HLE). For example, the use of 4-oxo-β-lactam55 for elaborating as HLE inhibitors was reported. The design was possible due to an earlier report56 on 4-oxo-β-sultam as inhibitor of porcine pancreatic lipase (PPE). The inhibition of elastase was possible through the expulsion of the sulfonamide group. The selectivity was improved using a weaker leaving group such as an amide. It was seen that isosteric analogues of 4-oxo-β-lactams retain the inhibitory activity. Docking studies indicated efcient non-covalent interactions of the inhibi­tor with the enzyme (Scheme 8.64). Thus, the application of β-lactams for the synthesis of numerous heterocycles has received signicant attention. In a seminal publication, Basak et al. demonstrated the use of β-lactams as starting materials for the preparation of diverse heterocyclic compounds.
57
267Beta-Lactams as Synthons for Diverse Heterocycles
https://t.me/med1917
8.4 Conclusion
β-Lactams are probably the most privileged heterocyclic systems in the broad domain of chemistry, biol­ogy, pharmacy, and clinical medicine. They are also important synthetic intermediates toward numerous bioactive and structurally diverse heterocycles. Some β-lactams have also been explored as structural scaffolds to tune, modulate, or mimic the reactivity of other bioactive compounds. The reliability and popularity of β-lactam synthon method are also signicant. Importantly, asymmetric synthesis of β-lactams and diverse heterocycles can be made using a variety of methods.
Acknowledgments
AD is grateful to CEA-Grenoble, Joseph Fourier University, University of Göttingen, and University of California, Los Angeles, for their support. BKB is grateful to the US NIH, the US NCI, Texas Kleberg Foundation, Stevens Institute of Technology, University of Texas M.D Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas-Pan American, University of Texas Health Science Center (San Antonio), and Community Health Systems of Texas for their competitive support to his research. AD and BKB acknowledge support from their current employer, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University. The authors are grateful to Professor Amit Basak for his tremendous contribution in this subject.
REFERENCES
1. Deshmukh, A. R. A. S.; Bhawal, B. M.; Krishnaswamy, D.; Govande, V. V.; Shinkre, B. A.; Jayanthi, A.
Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1889.
2. (a) Ojima, I. Adv. Asym. Synth. 1995, 1, 95. (b) Ojima, I.; Delaloge, F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997, 26, 377.
3. Banik, B. K.; Manhas, M. S.; Bose, A. K. J Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 307.
4. Alcaide, B.; Martín-Cantalejo, Y.; Pérez-Castells, J.; Sierra, M. A.; Monge, A. J Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
9156.
5. Alcaide, B.; Aly, M. F.; Sierra, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8819.
6. Alcaide, B.; Aly, M.; Rodríguez, C.; Rodríguez-Vicente, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3453.
7. (a) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Aly, M. F. Chem. Commun. 2000, 485. (b) Alcaide, B.;
Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Aly, M. F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1351.
8. Alajarín, M.; Vidal, A.; Sánchez-Andrada, S.; Tovar, F.; Ochoa, G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 965.
9. (a) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Aly, M. F.; Torres, M. R. Synlett. 2001, 1531. (b) Alcaide,
B.; Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Aly, M. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3415.
10. Jacobsen, M. F.; Turks, M.; Hazell, R.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2411.
11. Ban, L.; Guanti, G.; Rasparini, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1319.
12. (a) González-Moa, M. J.; Besada, P.; Teijeira, M.; Terán, C.; Uriarte, E. Synthesis. 2004, 543. (b) Viña,
D.; Santana, L.; Uriarte, E.; Quezada, E.; Valencia, L. Synthesis. 2004, 2517.
13. Dejaegher, Y.; De Kimpe, N. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5974.
14. Kale, A. S.; Deshmukh, A. R. A. S. Synlett. 2005, 2370.
15. (a) Jayaraman, M.; Puranik, V. G.; Bhawal, B. M. Tetrahedron. 1996, 52, 9005. (b) Shindo, M.; Ohtsuki,
K.; Shishido, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2005, 16, 2821.
16. Alcaide, B.; Sáez, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1680.
17. Ban, L.; Basso, A.; Guanti, G.; Riva, R. Arkivoc. 2006, Vii, 2 61.
18. Van Brabandt, W.; Dejaegher, Y.; Van Landeghem, R.; De Kimpe, N. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1101.
19. Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Redondo, M. C. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2616.
20. Macías, A.; Ramallal, A. M.; Alonso, E.; del Pozo, C.; González, J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7721.
21. Leemans, E.; D’hooghe, M.; Dejaegher, Y.; Törnroos, K. W.; Kimpe, N. D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2 010,
352.
22. Chandra, K.; Dutta, D.; Das, A.; Basak, A. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 8365.
23. Takahashi, M.; Sudo, T.; Murata, Y.; Sengoku, T.; Yoda, H. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2003, 8, 889.
24. Bose, A. K.; Banik, B. K.; Mathur, C.; Wagle, D. R.; Manhas, M. S. Tetrahedron. 2000, 56, 5603.
268 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
25. Manhas, M. S.; Wagle, D. R.; Bose, A. K. Heterocycles. 1988, 27, 1755.
26. Banik, B. K.; Samajdar, S.; Banik, I.; Tetrahedron Lett. 2023, 44, 1699.
27. Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Esnal, A.; Landa, A.; Miranda, J. I.; Linden, A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5838.
28. Durham, T. B.; Miller, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 27.
29. (a) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo, C. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 3646. (b) Alcaide, B.; Almendros,
P.; Aragoncillo, C. Chem. Commun. 2000, 757.
30. Alcaide, B.; Martín-Cantalejo, Y.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Sierra, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4767.
31. Alcaide, B.; Martín-Cantalejo, Y.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Sierra, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4767.
32. Alcaide, B.; Rodríguez-Campos, I. M.; Rodríguez- López, J.; Rodríguez-Vicente, A. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 53 7 7.
33. Alcaide, B.; Rodríguez-Ranera, C.; Rodríguez-Vicente, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3081.
34. Macías, A.; Alonso, A.; del Pozo, C.; González, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4 6 57.
35. Alcaide, B.; Domínguez, G.; Martín-Domenech, A.; Plumet, J.; Monge, A.; Pérez-García, V.
Heterocycles. 1987, 26, 1461.
36. Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo, C.; Salgado, N. R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9596.
37. Dejaegher, Y.; Mangelinckx, P.; De Kimpe, N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2075.
38. Cabell, L. A.; McMurray, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2491.
39. Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Pardo, C.; Rodríguez -Ranera, C.; Rodríguez -Vicente, A. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 3106.
40. Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Redondo, M. C. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1765.
41. Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Cabrero, G.; Ruiz, M. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3981.
42. (a) Escalante, J.; González-Tototzin, M. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 981. (b) Park, J.-H.; Ha,
J.-R.; Oh, S.-J.; Kim, J.-A.; Shin, D.-S.; Won, T.-J.; Lam, Y.-F.; Ahn, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1755.
43. Csomééós, P.; Fodor, L.; Sinkkonen, J.; Pihlaja, K.; Bernóáth, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5665.
44. Van Brabandt, W.; Van Landeghem, R.; De Kimpe, N. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1105.
45. Alcaide, B.; Pérez-Castells, J.; Polanco, C.; Sierra, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6012.
46. Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Aragoncillo, C.; Salgado, N. R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9596.
47. Basak, A.; Khamrai, U. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7913.
48. (a) Ban, L.; Guanti, G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2393. (b) Same as reference number 42.
49. (a) Basak, A.; Mandal, S.; Bag, S. S. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4077. (b) Kar, A.; Basak, A. Chem. Rev.
2007, 107, 2861
50. Basak, A.; Khamrai, U. K.; Mallik, U. Chem. Comm. 1996, 749.
51. Basak, A.; Mandal, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4241.
52. Pal, R.; Basak, A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2992.
53. Basak, A.; Pal, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 2015.
54. (a) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Benito, A.; Miranda, J. I.; Fratila, R. M.; Matute, C.; Domercq, M.;
Gago, F.; Martin-Santamaria, S.; Linden, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16243. (b) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M; Ganboa, I.; Benito, A.; Cuerdo, L.; Fratila, R. M.; Jimenez, A.; Loinaz, I.; Miranda, J. I.; Pytlewska, K. R.; Micle, A.; Linden, A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4443. (c) Palomo, C.; Aizpurua, J. M.; Benito, A.; Galarza, R.; Khamrai, U. K.; Vazquez, J.; Pascual-Teresa, B.; Nieto, P. M.; Linden, A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3056.
55. Basak, A.; Ghosh, S. C.; Das, A. K.; Bertolasi, V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 4050.
56. Mulchande, J.; Guedes, R. C.; Tsang, W. Y.; Page, M. I.; Moreira, R.; Iley, J. J. Med . Chem. 2008, 51,
1783.
57. Bhattacharya, P.; Dutta, S.; Chandra, K.; Basak, A. In Beta Lactams Novel Synthetic Pathways and
Applications, Springer Book Chapter, 2017, 373 – 419.
9
https://t.me/med1917
Medicinal Activities of Beta-Lactams as Antibacterials and Their Mechanism of Action
Aparna Das1 and Bimal Krishna Banik
1
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, College of Sciences and Human Studies,
2
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
2
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, College of Sciences and Human Studies, Deanship of Research Development, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. *Corresponding authors: Aparna Das, email: aparnadasam @gmail .c om; BimalKrishna Banik, email: bimalbanik10 @gmail .c om; bbanik @pmu .edu .sa
9.1 Introduction
The beta-lactam antibiotics are currently the most important antibacterial agents in the arsenal of agents used to treat infectious diseases at present. In the United States, beta-lactam antibiotics account for more than 65% of all prescriptions for injectable antibiotics. Among all beta-lactams, cephalosporins account for nearly half of all prescriptions for beta-lactams (Tabl e 9.1). There are a number of beta-lactams that are well tolerated and are effective and widely prescribed.
A small but signicant part of the toxicity of penicillins and cephalosporins can be attributed to the development of an allergic reaction due to similar side-chain determinants; notably, such reactions are most prevalent with penicillins and cephalosporins, while monobactams are least reactive.1, 2 When it comes to treating serious infections, beta-lactams are considered to have a major advantage over other antibiotics as they possess a bactericidal mechanism of killing. Due to the rapid emergence of beta­lactamases against these agents, beta-lactamase-stable agents were developed in an effort to counteract this threat, as well as potent beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs).
We have conducted synthesis and biological evaluation of diverse organic compounds including beta-lactams. compounds in chiral forms is achieved by employing carbohydrates, enzymes, and asymmetric metal­assisted methods. tures. To accelerate the process and follow environmentally benign methods, microwave-mediated reactions are performed. and many of these are considered anticancer agents. organocatalysis are followed to prepare diverse compounds with anticancer activities. this chapter, the most commonly available beta-lactam antibiotics (such as penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams) are presented.
3–8
Many of these compounds are linear or cyclic in nature.
20–24
25–27
Some organocatalytic routes are used to synthesize molecules with antitumor properties.
Studies on physical parameters help to design potent biologically active struc-
32–46
We have shown the application of tellurium for the preparation of organic molecules,
47–58
A number of environmental methods including
9–19
Synthesis of some of these
25–28, 59–67, 68–74
28–31
In
9.2 Mechanism of Action
As a result of covalent binding to essential penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), beta-lactam antibiotics act as bactericidal agents that interrupt the formation of bacterial cell walls, which are critical enzymes
DOI: 10.1201/9780367816339-9
269
270 Chemistry and Biology of Beta-Lactams
https://t.me/med1917
TABLE 9.1
Usage of Parenteral Β-Lactams by Class from 2004 to 2104 in the United States
Class of β-lactam Percentage of prescriptions
Cephalosporins 47.49 Broad spectrum penicillins Carbapenems 11.20 Narrow-spectrum penicillins 3.12 Monobactams 1.66
a
The percentage for each injectable antibiotic class prescribed in the United States from 2004 to 2014. (Data from the IMS MDART Quarterly Database on le at AstraZeneca).
b
Broad-spectrum penicillins include the β-lactam/β-lactam-inhibitor combinations piper­acillin–tazobactam, ticarcillin–clavulanate, and ampicillin–sulbactam.
b
36.54
a
involved in the terminal steps of peptidoglycan cross-linking in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. As each bacterial species has its own unique set of PBPs, they can range from three to eight enzymes depending on the species.75 Tipper and Strominger published a classical paper in which they describe how penicillin inhibits the transpeptidation of bacterial peptidoglycans mechanistically.76 They noted that penicillin G has a structural similarity with the terminal d-Ala-d-Ala dipeptides that form the nascent peptidoglycans in a dividing bacterial cell.
It is now known that this mechanism involves the binding of penicillin, or another beta-lactam, to a serine in the active site of all functional PBPs.77 It is possible that the inactive acyl enzyme produced by the process may then slowly hydrolyze the antibiotic in order to form a microbiologically inactive product.78 Recent work on beta-lactams, such as ceftaroline, has demonstrated that these compounds bind to an allosteric site in a cell surface protein called PBP2 in S. aureus and lead to an increase in the susceptibility of the organism to antibiotics.
PBPs can be classied according to their molecular mass,
79, 80
81, 82
with low-molecular-mass PBPs serving mainly as monofunctional d-Ala-d-Ala carboxypeptidases. One of the main functions of high-molecular­mass PBPs consists of two subclasses: the rst (class A) consists of bifunctional enzymes with both transpeptidase and as transglycosylase domains, and the second (class B) comprises transpeptidases which are dependent on d-Ala-d-Ala. At least one PBP is deemed to be essential in each species, with a unique specicity for beta-lactam binding that varies among each species and each beta-lactam class.83 In Gram-negative bacteria, essential PBPs include the high-molecular-weight PBPs 1a and 1b that are involved in cell lysis; PBP2, the inhibition of which results in a cessation of cell division and the forma­tion of spherical cells; and PBP3 for which inhibition arrests cell division, resulting in lamentation. If one or more of these PBPs are inhibited, cell death may occur as a result of the inhibition.84 There is a detailed discussion of the roles of PBPs in Gram-positive bacteria, as well as M. tuberculosis.
85
9.3 Antibacterial Activities of Cephalosporins
A cephalosporin is a class of beta-lactam antibiotics that are derived from the fungus Acremonium, which was formerly known as Cephalosporium (Fig u re 9.1). As a group with cephamycins, they are considered to be a subgroup of beta-lactam antibiotics known as cephems. Cephalosporin was rst dis­covered in 1945, and its rst sales took place in 1964.86 In general, substitutions at position 3 affect the pharmacology of the drug; substitutions at position 7 affect the antibacterial activity of the drug, but this is not always the case.
Cephalosporin antibiotics can be prescribed for the prophylaxis and treatment of infections caused by bacteria that are susceptible to this particular form of antibiotic. A majority of the rst-generation cephalosporins are active against Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. Therefore, they are mostly used in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, as well as the preven­tion of hospital-acquired surgical infections.87 Over time, successive generations of cephalosporins have
271Medicinal Activities of Beta-Lactams as Antibacterials
https://t.me/med1917
FIGURE 9.1 Core structure of the cephalosporin antibiotics.
increased their activity against Gram-negative bacteria, even though they have often reduced their activ­ity against Gram-positive organisms. Due to the different structure of the beta-lactam antibiotics, the antibiotic may be used in patients who are allergic to penicillin. It is possible for the drug to be excreted in the urine after it has been taken.
Cephalosporin therapy is associated with a number of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that may include diarrhea, nausea, rash, electrolyte disturbances, as well as pain and inammation at the injection site. ADRs that are uncommon include vomiting, headaches, dizziness, vaginal and oral candidiasis, pseudo­membranous colitis, superinfections, eosinophilia, nephrotoxicity, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fever.
A cephalosporin is a beta-lactam antibiotic that is bactericidal, and, as with other beta-lactam antibiot­ics, it disrupts the synthesis of the peptidoglycan layer that makes up the bacterial cell wall. In order to maintain the structural integrity of the cell wall, the peptidoglycan layer is important. During the process of synthesizing the peptidoglycan, the nal step of transpeptidation is carried out by PBPs. It is known that PBPs bind to the D-Ala-D-Ala at the end of muropeptides (peptidoglycan precursors) in order to cross-link the peptidoglycan. Beta-lactam antibiotics mimic the D-Ala-D-Ala site, thereby irreversibly inhibiting PBP cross-linking of peptidoglycan.
76
There are different ways in which the nucleus of cephalosporin can be modied in order to gain differ­ent properties. Depending on the antimicrobial properties of a cephalosporin, they can be grouped into “generations”. It should be noted that the rst cephalosporins were classied as rst-generation cepha­losporins; however, later, more extended-spectrum cephalosporins were classied as second-generation cephalosporins. It is a well-known fact that each newer generation has greater Gram-negative antimicro­bial properties than the preceding generation, and, in most cases, their activity against Gram-positive organisms has decreased as well. There is, however, a true broad spectrum of activity with the fourth­generation cephalosporins.
Since the discovery of the naturally occurring penicillinase-resistant cephalosporin C in the 1950s, a new path has been opened to the development of hundreds of novel cephalosporins, which are used to treat infections caused by the major penicillinase-producing pathogen of medical interest at that time, S. aureus, which has been known for centuries.
88, 89
As a result, there are several hundred cephalosporins in
clinical practice, either as parenteral or as oral medications. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of these molecules were often as low as 4 µg/mL, indicating antibacterial activity not only against staph­ylococci, but also against S. pneumoniae, as well as bacteria that do not produce beta-lactamase. In a lot of cases, it was found that the parenteral agents had a potency eightfold higher than the oral agents, which could be used in some cases as a replacement for oral penicillins in patients with penicillin allergies.
In the early days of cephalosporins, such as those in the cephalosporin I subclass,90 introduced before 1980, many of them were susceptible to hydrolysis by the beta-lactamases that emerged as a result of their introduction into clinical practice. As a result, only a few of these molecules remain in use, primar­ily for treating mild-to-moderate skin infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MSSA).91 For surgical prophylaxis and to treat abdominal infections92 (Tables 9.2 –9.4), cefazolin is effective as a rst­line treatment in 80% of Japanese children who suffer from their rst upper urinary tract infection 93.
As soon as the transmission electron microscopy (TEM)-1 penicillinase was found on transmissible plasmids in N. gonorrhoeae94 and H. inuenza,95 the medical community quickly recognized that the penicillins and cephalosporins in use were becoming increasingly ineffective, not only in treating those organisms that produced TEM-1, but also in treating enteric bacteria and P. aeruginosa, which had the potential to acquire this enzyme. Cephalosporins, which are applied both topically and parenterally, are