Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_961_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
60 B.M. Stephenson
females than males with an average ratio of 2.5:1, but this is also age dependent (see Figs. other data that disputes this statistic (see Chap. 17 ). Maingot states that femoral hernias in women are eight times more common than in men [ 30 ] . Glassow, from the Shouldice Clinic in Toronto Canada, reports more males than females in his series, at a ratio of 5:3 [ 31 ] . However, it must be remembered that Glassow’s large series is of patients undergoing elective operation for inguinal hernia and many of the cases were found as concomitant femoral hernias in men undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. Clearly this series, or similar ones, does not fairly represent everyday general surgical practice.
Over 30 years ago approximately 40% of femoral hernias in the UK were admitted acutely with complications such as strangulation or incarceration [ 32 ] . This is also still unfortu- nately true in many other developed countries at the time of writing [ 33, 34 ] . Women still however undergo three times as many inguinal as opposed to femoral hernia repairs. Femoral hernias are rare in those under 35, are most common in mul­tiparous women, and surprisingly as common in men as in multiparous women. The ratio of inguinal to femoral hernias is between 10:1 and 8:1. In Accra, Ghana, femoral hernias are rare, accounting for only 1.2% of groin hernias, with an ingui­nal to femoral ratio of 77:1. In Kampala, Uganda, the ratio is very different, 22:1. It is interesting to observe that indirect inguinal hernias outnumber direct inguinal hernias in Accra and in Zaria, Nigeria, whereas in Kampala direct hernias are more frequent. In Kampala there are nine women with femo­ral hernias to one man, whereas in West African Hausa the male to female ratio of femoral hernias is 1.2:1 [ 35– 39 ] .
The surgical volume for rates of femoral hernia repair in NHS hospitals in England has remained stable between 1975 and 1990, with 5,083 primary femoral hernia repairs and 299 recurrent femoral hernia repairs being performed in 1989/1990. The age-speci fi c data indicate an increasing rate of repair through the decades with a peak in our elderly female population (Fig.
There is also considerable variation in surgical rates for both inguinal and femoral hernia repair in the districts of English Regional Health Authorities. The range for primary inguinal hernia repair is 0.57–24 per 10,000 and for primary femoral hernia repair 0.16–2.3 per 10,000. Such unexplain­able wide variations re fl ect the diversity of clinical practice and the “demand and supply” of treatment options already noted [
9 ] .
3.1 and 3.2 ). However, there is
3.5 ).

Etiology of Primary Groin Hernia

The pathogenesis of groin herniation is multifactorial. Sir Astley Cooper’s “predispositions” to hernia, in 1827, and the subsequent addition of chronic cough, obesity, constipation,
pregnancy, ascites, and prostatic hypertrophy are now only of historic interest. These factors may reveal a hernia but cer­tainly did not cause it ab initio.
As indirect inguinal hernias are so common in infancy, the fi rst surgical speculation was that they were due to a developmental defect. Indirect inguinal hernia arises from incomplete obliteration of the processus vaginalis, the embryological out pocketing of peritoneum that precedes testicular descent into the scrotum. The testes originate along the urogenital line in the retroperitoneum and migrate cau­dally during the second trimester of pregnancy to arrive at the internal inguinal ring at about 6 months of intrauterine life. During the last trimester they proceed through the abdominal wall via the inguinal canal and descend into the scrotum, the right slightly later than the left. The processus vaginalis then normally obliterates postnatally except for the portion surrounding and serving as a covering for the testes. Failure of this obliterative process results in congenital indi­rect inguinal hernia. The modern epidemiological support for this hypothesis has already been reviewed, while the dif­fering familial and tribal incidences, and the coincidence of hernias in twins, are supportive.
John Hunter, in the late eighteenth century, researched the development and descent of the testis in men and domestic animals. He showed that in some inguinal hernias, the sac was continuous with the processus vaginalis [ 40 ] . The Parisian surgeon Cloquet, of nodal fame, observed that the processus vaginalis was frequently not closed at birth [ 41 ] . Indeed a complete (or scrotal) indirect hernia in an adult man has the same anatomy as that of the neonate—it is invested by all the three layers of the spermatic cord as it transverses the inguinal canal and its sac is continuous with the tunica vaginalis of the testis. Additional support for the congenital theory of indirect inguinal herniation is the fi nding at autopsy that 15–30% of adult males without clinically apparent inguinal hernias have a patent processus vaginalis at death [ 42 ] . A Bedouin mother and her four daughters with indirect inguinal hernia in whom there was no evidence of collagen diseases, normal hormone pro fi le, and normal pelvic anat­omy suggest that in adult females as well, there is genetic heterogeneity [ 43 ] . Such an occurrence in females may be associated with an alteration in the anatomy of the round ligament, which normally terminates in a hernia sac and is attached to the midportion of the fallopian tube near the ovary [ 44 ] .
Review of the contralateral side in infantile inguinal her­nias reveals a patent processus vaginalis in 60% of neonates and a contralateral hernia in 10–20%. In slightly older children (say 2 years or so) the rate of developing a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia is of the order of 5–7% with those children having a left-sided one at a higher risk of later herniation than had the fi rst hernia been on the other side [
45, 46 ] . In addition, at 20 years of follow-up after
613 Epidemiology and Etiology of Primary Groin Hernias
an infantile hernia repair, 22% of men will develop a contralateral inguinal hernia, of which 41% occur if the ini­tial hernia was on the left and 14% if the initial hernia was on the right.
The introduction of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in the management of renal failure has demonstrated that a persistent processus vaginalis, if sub­jected to intra-abdominal pressure, will dilate to give a hydrocele or hernia [
47– 49 ] . Indeed this has been docu-
mented as late as 2 years after commencing CAPD. In addi­tion the development of an inguinal hernia in female CAPD patients adds further support to this premise [ 49– 51 ] .
Russell, an Australian pediatric surgeon, in 1906 advanced the “saccular theory” of the formation of hernia, a theory that “rejects the view that any hernia can ever be “acquired” in the pathological sense and maintains that the presence of a developmental peritoneal diverticulum is a necessary ante­cedent condition in every case … We may have an open funicular peritoneum and we may have them separately or together in in fi nitely variable gradations” [ 52 ] . In recent years, with the increasing use of “diagnostic” laparoscopy, some light has been shed on this debate. When the inguinal anatomy of 600 patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for other reasons was carefully recorded, the prevalence of a sac or remnant of a patent processus vaginalis did not seem to increase with age [ 53 ] . However and interestingly, when these patients were followed for over 5 years, those in whom an asymptomatic patent processus vaginalis had been noted were four times more likely to have undergone a later hernia repair [ 54 ] .
It would be apparent from the above that the problem of indirect inguinal hernia may not be simply one of a congeni­tal defect, that is, there is more to the story than just a persis­tent patent processus vaginalis. The high frequency of indirect inguinal hernia in middle-aged and older people suggests a pathological change in connective tissue of the abdominal wall to be a contributory factor. Indeed, simple removal of the sac in adults results in an unacceptably high recurrence rate and clearly is inappropriate. Thus the suscep­tibility to herniation is based on both the presence of a con- genital sac and failure of the transversalis fascia. In direct inguinal hernia there is no peritoneal sac and the prevalence parallels aging and other factors including smoking [ 55, 56 ] . Furthermore the absence of an adequate musculoaponeurotic support for the fascia transversalis and the medial half of the inguinal canal has been described in about a quarter of indi­viduals [ 24 ] . In these men there is de fi ciency of the lower aponeurotic fi bers of the internal oblique muscle, coupled with a narrow insertion of the transversus abdominis onto the superior pubic ramus [
57, 58 ] . Because such a congenital
anomaly would be symmetric, this explanation is consistent with the clinical fi nding that direct hernias are frequently bilateral and often surprisingly asymptomatic.
Fig. 3.7 The European pelvis is relatively wide with a less deep arch than the Negro pelvis. This ensures that the internal oblique muscle origin from the lateral inguinal ligament is broad, so that the internal oblique muscle “protects” the deep ring
The anatomic disposition of the pelvis, and particularly the height of the pubic arch, may also be a signi fi cant and possibly ethnic characteristic predisposing to inguinal hernia formation. The height of the pubic arch is measured as the distance of the pubic tubercle from the bispinous line between the innermost parts of the two anterior superior iliac spines. African (Negro) peoples have lower pubic arches than Europeans and a higher incidence of inguinal hernia. In West and East Africa the “lowness” of the pubic arch is greater than 7.5 cm in 65% of males; in Europeans and in Arabs the arch is less low, 65% of males having a height of between 5 and 7.5 cm (Fig.
3.7 ). In European females 80% have an arch
between 5 and 7.5 cm, and they have the lowest incidence of groin hernias [ 39, 59, 60 ] .
This “low” arch is associated with a narrower pelvis and with a narrower origin of the external oblique muscle from the lateral inguinal ligament. With these anatomic variations the inguinal canal is shorter with the deep inguinal ring left uncovered by the internal oblique. The canal may then be so short that no signi fi cant muscular “shutter mechanism” is apparent [ 59 ] as illustrated by Fig. 3.8 . There is another much rarer form of direct hernia where a narrow peritoneal diverticulum comes directly through the conjoint tendon lat­eral to the rectus and pyramidal muscles to project at the super fi cial inguinal ring. In addition there are numerous unusual types of interparietal hernias where the sac may be mono- or bilocular and associated or not with a patent indi­rect sac.
It must be concluded that there are congenital, anatomi­cal, and genetic factors that render individuals more likely to manifest direct as opposed to indirect inguinal hernias.
Over 80 years ago Sir Arthur Keith, a Scottish anatomist and anthropologist, observed: “There is one other matter, which requires further observation. We are so apt to look on
62 B.M. Stephenson
Fig. 3.8 The Negro pelvis is narrower than the European, which means that the lowness of the arch of the pelvis is greater in the Negro and the origin of the internal oblique relatively narrower. Hence the internal oblique will not cover the deep ring during straining, and the “shutter mechanism” of the inguinal canal is de fi cient. Negroes have a ten times greater incidence of indirect inguinal hernia than Europeans
tendons, fascial structures and connective tissues as dead passive structures. They are certainly alive, and the fact that hernias are so often multiple in middle aged and old people leads one to suspect that a pathological change in the con­nective tissues of the belly wall may render certain indi­viduals particularly liable to hernia.” He concluded his argument with a statement regarding “the importance of a right understanding of the etiology of hernia … If they occur only in those who have hernial sacs already formed during fetal life then we must either excise the sacs at birth or stand by and do nothing but trust to luck. But if … the occurrence of hernia is due to circumstances over which we have control then the prevention of hernia is a matter wor­thy of our serious study” [ 23 ] .
Some 50 years later, Read, an American surgeon, made a crucial clinical observation which further advanced our thoughts as to the etiology of inguinal hernia. In 1970 he noted, when using an open preperitoneal approach to the inguinal region, that the rectus sheath is thinner and has a “greasy” feel in those patients who turned out to have direct inguinal defects. This observation was con fi rmed by weigh­ing samples of a constant cross-sectional area; specimens from controls weighed signi fi cantly more than those from patients with indirect, pantaloon, and direct hernias (in that order). Bilateral hernias were associated with more severe atrophy. Adjustments for age and muscle mass con fi rmed the validity of this observation [ 56 ] . Further evidence in support of a collagen derangement in the transversalis fascia was pre­sented by Peacock and Madden in 1974, who observed that satisfactory repair of adult inguinal herniation depended on the local extent of any collagen de fi ciency. And, if surgical technical failure can be excluded, the logical treatment of
recurrent herniation is a fascial graft or prosthetic repair [ 61 ] . This concept was enthusiastically promoted by Irving Lichtenstein, one of the earliest pioneers of prosthetic repair for primary inguinal hernia [ 62 ] . We now all know how this revolutionized modern hernia practice [
17 ] .

Hernias “Under the Microscope”

Let us start with some basic science that we may have forgot­ten! Surgical wound healing is a controlled cascade in which there are sequential cellular and molecular events allowing ordered tissue repair. After the initial wound there is a phase of healing characterized by hemostasis and in fl ammation followed by one of proliferation, which is predominantly one of increased fi broblastic activity with extracellular deposi­tion and increased angiogenesis. Collagen is the end product of fi broblast activity, and while there are many types of col­lagen, type I and type III are those most implicated in wound healing. Subsequent remodeling involves collagen bundle organization to give rise to a mature scar. Now, before mov­ing on, let us remind ourselves that the inguinal canal and transversalis fascia comprise tissues made up of collagen, elastic fi bers consisting of elastin and micro fi brils, and the glycosaminoglycan component of the extracellular matrix.
Following the earlier observations regarding the “greasy” feel of the rectus sheath [ 56 ] , Read and coworkers showed that hydroxyproline, which comprises 80% of the dry weight of collagen, was strikingly decreased in the rectus sheath of inguinal hernia patients especially if the hernia was of a direct type [ 63, 64 ] . The extracted collagen revealed a reduced hydroxyproline:proline ratio. Intermolecular cross-linking is unaffected, but synthesis of hydroxyproline is inhibited, and there is variability in the diameter of the collagen fi brils in hernia patients [ 65 ] . Similar electron microscopic fi ndings are also present in pericardial and skin biopsies from these patients [ 65 ] and have also been described in connective tis­sue tumors [ [
68 ] . Based upon these observations and the results of later
similar studies, the prosthetic repair of inguinal hernias was promoted as the new “gold standard” of surgery. These fi ndings also changed the approach to the repair of ventral (including incisional) hernias such that the vast majority are now also augmented with prosthetic biomaterials.
The above observations led Read, in 1978, to the postu­late that inguinal herniation is not a localized defect of the groin fascia but is in fact a manifestation of a generalized connective tissue disorder similar to emphysema, a 1 -antit- rypsin de fi ciency, osteogenesis imperfecta, scurvy, varicose veins, and experimental nicotine de fi ciency [ was then tested with a computerized suction device to assess the biomechanical properties of the transversalis fascia and rectus abdominis so as to measure any functional connective
66 ] , pulmonary emphysema [ 67 ] , and scurvy
67 ] . This hypothesis
633 Epidemiology and Etiology of Primary Groin Hernias
tissue abnormalities in the groin [ 69 ] . The study was unable to demonstrate any differences in the properties of aponeuro­sis between hernia patients and controls. There was, how­ever, a difference in collagen ultrastructure when it was examined under an electron microscope and in its physico­chemical properties as observed by altered perceptibility and de fi ciency in hydroxyproline content. It appears thus that the fundamental problem in the aponeurosis of men with direct inguinal herniation is failure of hydroxylation of the collagen molecule.
Berliner in 1984 con fi rmed these fi ndings by studying biopsies from three sites in patients with inguinal hernia [
70 ] . Degenerative changes in the musculoaponeurotic fi bers
were found not only in the transversalis fascia/transversus abdominis of patients with direct inguinal hernias but also in the transversalis fascia at the superior aspect of the internal ring in patients with indirect inguinal hernia and also distant from the hernia site in grossly normal transversus abdominis aponeurosis. The main changes observed were reduction in elastic tissue with a paucity and fragmentation of elastic fi ber similar to that seen in Marfan and Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS). The implication from these fi ndings is that collagen malsynthesis and enzymolysis mutually but not necessarily equally play a major role in the etiology of both direct and indirect inguinal hernia. Indeed, this was supported when the in vitro synthesis of types I and III collagens (and their pro­collagen mRNAs) was studied from isolated skin fi broblasts in patients with inguinal hernia. Fibroblasts incubated with radiolabeled tritiated proline secreted increased amounts of type III procollagen, suggesting that an altered fi broblast phenotype in patients with inguinal hernia could result in reduced collagen fi bril assembly and defective connective tissue formation [ 71 ] . Further support for this suggestion comes from a case–control (fresh cadavers) study where both the total and type I collagen were decreased in fi t young men with indirect inguinal hernias [ 72 ] .
Could an uninhibited elastolytic enzyme system cause
groin herniation—a similar mechanism to low serum levels of the protease inhibitor a 1-antitrypsin globulin allowing endogenous enzymes to destroy alveoli? [ 73 ] . Experimental evidence certainly supports the biochemical hypothesis that the pulmonary connective tissue disorder in emphysema is an imbalance between proteolytic enzyme levels and their inhib­itors. Evidence of raised elastolytic enzyme has been found in smokers, and in smokers with inguinal herniation there is a close association between raised elastolytic levels and raised white counts. Neutrophils carry proteolytic and elastolytic enzymes and are actively involved in the lung in fl ammatory response to cigarette smoke. Could they not also deliver the same proteolytic insult to the transversalis fascia? The neu­trophil-derived enzyme metalloproteinase (MMP-2 and MMP-9) has been identi fi ed as one that breaks down colla­gen, elastin, and other components of the extracellular matrix.
They have been found in transversus abdominis biopsies of patients with direct but not indirect inguinal hernias. MMP-2 overexpression has been measured in fi broblasts of patients with direct hernias, and MMP-13 overexpression detected in recurrent inguinal hernias [ 74, 75 ] . While these studies are best described as observational they are important indicators of the pathological process at the cellular level. Although it is unclear whether a deteriorating groin expresses increased MMP levels, it is of interest to see that transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF- b 1) is overexpressed in the transversalis fascia of young patients with direct hernias [ 76 ] . Such growth factors are known to play a role in tissue remodeling and are presumably doing so or attempting to counterbalance the microscopic problems of a failing groin.
On a “macroscopic” or clinical scale, is there evidence that collagen is at fault? The prevalence of inguinal hernia (41%) in 119 patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms was signi fi cantly higher when compared with 81 patients with aortic–iliac occlusive disease (18.5%) and 293 patients with coronary artery disease (18.1%). In addition, the number of patients who had undergone a recent hernia repair (16%) or were still waiting for repair (19%) was very high [ 77 ] . Also following elective aortic reconstruction for aneurysmal or occlusive aortic disease, at 1 year follow-up, incisional her­nias were found in 31% of patients with aneurysm and 12% with occlusive disease, and inguinal hernias were found in 19% of patients with aneurysm and 5% with occlusive dis­ease further supporting the concept of a biochemical abnor­mality [ 78 ] . The smoking habits of the three groups were not different, and again the fi ndings support the concept of systemic fi ber degeneration [ 79 ] . Although the enzymatic elastase content of the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms has been shown to be increased, the concept of high levels of circulating elastase has not been con fi rmed. Nevertheless, overall patients with aneurysmal disease have a fourfold increased risk of inguinal and incisional herniation [ 80, 81 ] . Similar fi ndings have been found in patients examined by a magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal wall follow­ing aortic surgery [ 82 ] . These fi ndings indicate that 50% or more of patients with nonocclusive infrarenal aortic aneu­rysm suffer from inguinal hernia. Indeed, it has been sug­gested that an inguinal hernia in certain high-risk age groups be used as an index for ultrasonic screening for aneurysmal disease [ 83 ] . However as the ultrasonography would have to be performed and repeated over a substantial period of time, the results of a small ( n = 70) prospective study go some way to point out this is not going to be a useful screening tool [ 84 ] .
A number of years ago the term “metastatic emphysema” was coined by Cannon and Read [
67 ] for the concept of a
generalized connective tissue disorder, which was maybe due to a leakage of proteases from the lungs of heavy smokers [ 85 ] . Read emphasized that the data indicate that more than
64 B.M. Stephenson
Fig. 3.9 Persistent herniation in Ehlers– Danlos syndrome. Note the unusual skin appearance
one factor can cause systemic metabolic disease of collagen leading to abdominal herniation including the imbalanced expression of different collagens. Subsequent results have con fi rmed this in the transversalis fascia of patients with inguinal hernia by direct measurement of the important col­lagens (types I and III) [ 72, 86 ] . Nevertheless we must be cautious in interpreting the experimental data about a prote­olytic defect in inguinal hernia patients and then relating it to the proven association with abdominal aortic aneurysm. It is however tempting to relate this “metastatic emphysema the­ory of inguinal herniation” to Hunt’s and Tilson’s ideas that aortic aneurysm is a copper transport collagen disorder enhanced by cigarette smoking [ 87, 88 ] .
With all the available data [ 89– 91 ] , it seems probable and indeed highly likely that primary inguinal hernias are a con­nective tissue disorder as opposed to recurrent ones, which are due to a combination of this underlying innate problem and a technical failure of wound healing/repair. This further supports the need for a well-dissected prosthetic repair in the fi rst instance. Whether biological meshes will play a part in the elective repair of primary inguinal hernias, other than in a few very selected cases, remains to be seen [ 92 ] .

A Curious Case of Recurrent Recurrence

A 45-year-old otherwise asymptomatic man developed an incisional hernia following a lower midline laparotomy for peritonitis from a perforated appendix. This was repaired but recurred and did so again when this recurrence was repaired with preperitoneal mesh. Wound healing seemed attenuated
and the hernia unmanageable. After a further repair using the component separation technique (again augmented with on­lay mesh) failed, a diagnosis of EDS was contemplated and later established (Fig. 3.9 ).
This unusual inherited connective tissue disorder, also known as “cutis hyperelastica,” is caused by a defect in the synthesis of collagen (type III). There are numerous recog­nized types of EDS [ 93 ] with the genetic mutations (auto- somal dominant mode of inheritance) altering the structure, production, or processing of collagen or the proteins that interact with collagen to varying degrees. Even in established EDS, now known to be more prevalent than previously thought, the symptoms and presentation vary widely. Treatment is generally supportive and the prognosis depen­dent on the type of EDS.
Could “milder” defects in collagen synthesis/metabolism be even more prevalent in the population than otherwise con­templated with other factors such as smoking accelerating the general wear and tear process that we subject ourselves too? Interestingly inguinal hernia occurs more frequently in patients with milder EDS phenotypes.

Genetics in Pediatric Surgical Practice

Inguinal hernia may be associated with many different genetic syndromes including single gene and chromosomal disorders. Given the known constituents of the inguinal canal and transversalis fascia, one would expect such disorders to be associated with a higher risk of inguinal hernia [ Indeed genetic diseases of the micro fi bril (Marfan syndrome),
94 ] .
653 Epidemiology and Etiology of Primary Groin Hernias
elastin (Costello syndrome and Menkes disease), and collagen (EDS and osteogenesis imperfecta) are all associ­ated with an increased risk of inguinal hernia.
While the vast majority of childhood inguinal hernias do not have a genetic basis warning signs that a hernia may have, a genetic basis includes a direct hernia, a recurrent her­nia, or a hernia in girls as well as the more commonly recog­nized features associated with genetic disorders such as developmental delay.

The Genetics of Inheritance of the “Common” Indirect Inguinal Hernia

Although there is considerable evidence suggesting the role of genetic factors in the etiology of inguinal hernia, its mode of inheritance remains controversial [ hypotheses have been suggested:
1. Autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete pene-
trance [
96 ]
2. Autosomal dominant inheritance with sex in fl uence [ 97, 98 ]
3. X-linked dominant inheritance [ 99 ]
4. Polygenic inheritance [ 100, 101 ]
In a study from Budapest [ 100 ] , the parents of 707 index patients with operated indirect congenital inguinal hernia born during the years 1962–1966 were studied for their fre­quency of indirect inguinal hernia. There was a 2 and 5.6 times higher incidence respectively in the fathers and moth­ers than in the general population, and the rate of affected siblings was higher than that of parents but was generally dependant on the sex of the index patient. In twins the hered­itability was 0.77. These data suggested a multifactorial threshold model involving dominant variance.
A study of 280 families with congenital indirect inguinal hernia in the Shandong province of China has indicated that the mode of transmission in these families is autosomal dom­inant with incomplete penetrance and sex in fl uence. There is preferential paternal transmission of the gene, suggesting a role for genomic imprinting in the etiology of indirect ingui­nal hernias [ 102 ] . In this study the probands (index cases) had all been operated on by 5 years of age, with the hernia occurring on the right side in 138 and on the left side in 84. This is consistent with the known embryological facts that the right testis descends later than the left and that the pro­cessus vaginalis is therefore obliterated later on the right side than on the left side; hence hernia is more frequent on the right than on the left side.
In a record linkage study from the UK reported in 1998, of the risk of congenital inguinal hernia in siblings, 1921 male and 347 female cases born during 1970–1986 and who were operated on for inguinal hernia at the ages of 0–5 years were matched against 12,886 male and 2,534 female controls
103 ] . The relative risk for inguinal hernia was found to be
[
5.8 for brothers of male cases and 4.3 for brothers of female
95 ] . A number of
cases, while the relative risk was 3.7 for sisters of male cases and 17.8 for sisters of female cases. This pattern of sex-de­pendant risk suggests a multifactorial threshold model for the disease. In essence as girls have a much lower incidence of inguinal hernia, those girls who do develop the disease might have a potentially larger contribution to susceptibility from genetic or intrauterine risk factors unrelated to their sex.
More recently a study from Hong Kong has examined the strength of a positive family history as a risk factor for devel­oping an inguinal hernia [ using multivariate logistic regression analyses, a positive family history was the only truly independent predictor for a hernia; indeed a man with a positive family history is eight times more likely to develop a primary inguinal hernia.
Indirect inguinal hernia arises from incomplete oblitera­tion of the processus vaginalis, the embryological protru­sion of peritoneum that precedes testicular descent into the scrotum. The testes originate along the urogenital line in the retroperitoneum and migrate caudally during the second tri­mester of pregnancy to arrive at the internal inguinal ring at about 6 months of intrauterine life. During the last trimester they proceed through the abdominal wall via the inguinal canal and descend into the scrotum, the right slightly later than the left. The processus vaginalis then normally obliter­ates postnatally except for the portion surrounding and serv­ing as a covering for the testes. Failure of this obliterative process results in congenital indirect inguinal hernia.
It is plausible to speculate that morphogenesis may be determined by single genes and complicated by environmen­tal factors. In the case of indirect inguinal hernia, an auto­somal dominantly inherited gene with reduced penetrance and sex in fl uence would therefore be susceptible to environ­mental factors in fl uencing its expression as a clinical ingui­nal hernia. In most families, however, a monogenic mode of inheritance is not apparent. Therefore the maternal allele (of a/the gene?) may protect against failure of closure of the pat­ent processus vaginalis.
In conclusion, the fact that most affected males have inherited an indirect inguinal hernia gene(s) from their father implicates a role of genomic imprinting (i.e., the paternal allele) in the etiology of the indirect inguinal hernia pheno­type. Finally it may be of interest to note that certain chro­mosomal loci have been identi fi ed as genetic susceptibility targets in pigs at known “high risk” of developing inguinos­crotal hernias [ 105 ] . We all have to start somewhere!
104 ] . As compared to controls and

Intra-abdominal Diseases Causing Hernias

Ascites due to liver, heart disease (failure), and more rarely abdominal or peritoneal carcinomatosis can present as recent onset groin and umbilical herniation. The mechanism is similar to that already described in CAPD patients, with increasing hydrostatic pressure dilating a preexisting sac
66 B.M. Stephenson
irrespective of its earlier size. Intra-abdominal contents may then follow into this enlarged space. Clearly the sudden onset of a hernia in middle-aged or elderly patients should thus arouse diagnostic suspicion. It is a sound policy to subject hernial sacs to histological examination, especially in older patients, where ascites (blood stained or not) is found or when the sac is thickened or indurated. However, the routine histological examination of “normal” hernial sacs is not justi fi ed. Indeed the chance of unexpected “pathology” in an otherwise normal hernial sac has been estimated (!) to be
0.00098% [
106 ] . Routine histology is certainly unnecessary
and obviously uneconomical.
Interestingly the histological examination of sacs obtained from children with hernia, hydrocoele, or undescended testis revealed that in the inguinal hernia patients during child­hood, smooth muscle was found within the wall of the sac but not in sacs associated with undescended testis. This sug­gests that this smooth muscle may have played a role in the prevention of obliteration and clinical outcome [ 107 ] .
Thickening of a hernial sac per se is not necessarily due to signi fi cant pathology; peritoneum is active tissue and par­ticularly in children and young adults can exhibit overexu­berant tumor-like reaction to mechanical injury. This so-called mesothelial hyperplasia may follow wearing a truss or occur simply after repeated attacks of near-incarceration. Microscopically there are atypical mesothelial cells that are either free or attached to the wall of the sac. Mitoses and multinucleated cells are frequently seen but despite this mesothelial hyperplasia are reactive and certainly not neo­plastic [ 108 ] .
The development of an abdominal wall hernia may be a rare but initial sign of decompensated heart or liver disease. Whereas good surgical practice is to repair an uncomplicated hernia, the question of repair in cirrhotics raises other issues. Leonetti et al. [ 109 ] reported that repair of umbilical hernias in uncontrolled unshunted cirrhotics led to a mortality of
8.3%, a morbidity of 16.6%, and a recurrence rate of 16.6%. However umbilical herniorrhaphy in patients with a func­tioning peritoneovenous shunt was associated with minimal morbidity (7%). The authors suggested that peritoneovenous shunting should be a prerequisite to hernia repair [ 109 ] . While this may not now always be necessary, these patients clearly need medical optimization before surgery [ 110 ] . There is now little doubt that elective surgery has signi fi cantly [ 111, 112 ] improved the quality of life of these patients with mesh repairs well tolerated and outcomes similar to patients without cirrhosis [ 113 ] .
Intra-abdominal pus can also collect in and distend an empty hernial sac, as with any peritoneal recess, at the initial peritonitis. It may also collect in a long-standing hernia even after successful emergency surgery (Fig. 3.10 ). In a review of 32 examples of this phenomenon, 19 were right inguinal, fi ve right femoral, three left inguinal, one epigastric, and one
Fig. 3.10 Residual collection in a large long-standing hernia after emergency surgery for gastric perforation
umbilical. Acute appendicitis accounted for 16 examples, perforated peptic ulcers for three, one followed pneumococcal peritonitis in a 2-week-old male child, one an acute pyosalpinx, and one followed a biliary leak after removal of a common bile duct drain [ 114 ] . Every patient with this complication was originally diagnosed as having a strangulated hernia, which is not surprising. If pus is found in a hernial sac, abdominal exploration is usually mandatory with acute appen­dicitis being the commonest diagnosis, especially in right­sided hernias [ 115 ] . When confronted with a tender incarcerated hernia, the diagnosis remains primarily a clinical one, but appropriate and recently more immediately available radiological investigations can usefully augment ones suspi­cions allowing a tailored minimally invasive staged approach when appropriate [ 116, 117 ] . A tender inguinal mass may not represent a hernia as demonstrated by Fig. 3.11 !

Inguinal Hernia and Appendectomy

Over a hundred years ago Hoguet fi rst reported the develop­ment of inguinal hernia in patients who had undergone previ­ous appendectomy [ 118 ] . He found eight right inguinal hernias in a series of 190 patients who had undergone appen­dectomy and suggested a causal relationship. Other authors have supported this contention [ 119– 121 ] .
Right inguinal hernias are more frequent when appendec­tomy is performed through a lower, “more cosmetic” incision, which is placed below the anterior superior iliac spine and in which the iliohypogastric nerve is injured. Electromyographic studies have shown con fl icting results. While some investiga-
121 ] have shown that denervation of the transversus
tors [ abdominis muscle in the groin does occur and could therefore interfere with the shutter mechanism of the deep ring and be a factor in the subsequent development of inguinal hernia, other
673 Epidemiology and Etiology of Primary Groin Hernias
Fig. 3.12 Herniography on a 40-year-old man who had sustained a
Fig. 3.11 A diverticular abscess presenting as a hernia. Fortunately a
colocutaneous fi stula did not develop in this frail 78-year-old lady
fracture of both pubic rami. The patient developed a “pantaloon” ingui­nal hernia
investigators have failed to detect any signi fi cant denervation of the musculature in and around the right groin [ 122 ] .
Using the standard McBurney (introduced by Charles McBurney in 1894) appendectomy incision (at right angles to a line from the umbilicus to the anterior superior iliac spine, at a point at the junction of its lateral third and medial two-thirds and parallel to the iliohypogastric nerve which is rarely injured if the fl ank muscles are opened by splitting in their fi ber line), there is no evidence that inguinal herniation is a consequence of appendectomy. In a series of 549 patients who had under­gone inguinal hernia repair, the percentage incidence of previ­ous appendectomy in right-sided hernias was 8.9 ± 1.7% and in left-sided inguinal hernias 11.2 ± 2.1% [ 123 ] .
It is the lower and “more cosmetic” incisions, which carry a particular hazard to the iliohypogastric nerve and a propen­sity to subsequent inguinal herniation. The introduction of effective antibiotics and the consequent reduction in wound complications are also clearly important. If and when laparo­scopic appendectomy is fully embraced as a standard approach (with reasons for and follow-up of converted cases) will we know if this technique also contributes to a lower incidence of subsequent inguinal herniation. The debate regarding open or laparoscopic appendectomy will no doubt continue for sometime before this becomes universal surgi­cal practice even in the developed world [
124 ] .

Hernias Related to Trauma and Pelvic Fracture

Abdominal hernias related to trauma and blunt injuries are rare and are only reported following lower abdominal and pelvic injuries. To diagnose a traumatic hernia there must be immediate signs of local soft-tissue injury, bruising, hematoma, etc., and then there must be the early presentation of the symptoms of the hernia. The aponeuroses close to their pel­vic attachments are most at risk.
Disruption of the inguinal canal and complete ruptures of the conjoint tendon are recorded but are very rare [ 125 ] . Ryan, from the Shouldice clinic, reported only fi ve hernias related to pelvic fractures in 8,000 hernia repairs [ 126 ] . Figure 3.12 illustrates an unusual case of a patient whose hernia was related to a pelvic fracture: A 40-year-old man developed a “pantaloon” hernia after fracture of both rami of the pubis in a traf fi c accident. Such “traumatic” hernias are also recognized after pelvic diastasis in the absence of frac­ture and often present late and may contain bladder or small bowel alone (supravesical).
Hernias related to iatrogenic pelvic fractures, for exam­ple, an osteotomy for congenital dislocation of the hip, are well described in the literature. Ryan classi fi es these fracture-related hernias according to the mechanism of the fracture [
126 ] :
68 B.M. Stephenson
Fig. 3.13 Diagram to show how innominate osteotomy predisposes to inguinal herniation
1. Due to acute anteroposterior forces acting on the pelvis: In these instances there is tearing of the rectus abdominis origin from the pubic crest. The tearing is maximal on the side opposite to that on which maximum bony displace­ment had occurred. The damage to the muscle is usually more severe medially than laterally, leading to the devel­opment of a broad-necked sac just suprapubically from
Fig. 3.14 An external femoral hernia (Hesselbach’s) passing deep into the thigh below the inguinal ligament lateral to the femoral vessels. Note the previous incision for corrective hip surgery of uncertain nature
the midline extending laterally across the attachment of the rectus to the pubic crest.
2. Due to lateral or lateral/vertical forces: These fractures involve the superior pubic ramus with consequent tearing of the fascial and aponeurotic attachments of the inguinofemoral region. In these circumstances a direct inguinal hernia develops through the fascia transversalis immediately above the bony fracture line. A repair of the direct hernia corrects the situation.
3. Due to surgical innominate osteotomy: This hernia occurs in children with congenital dislocated hips. The hernia following innominate osteotomy is either a direct inguinal hernia, a prevascular femoral (Narath’s) hernia, or a com­bination of the two [ 127 ] .
Following innominate or Salter’s osteotomy, there is a downward lateral and forward displacement of the lower frag­ment of the pelvis produced by a combination of hinging and
Fig. 3.15 An earlier anterior bone graft site complicated by groin her­niation. The sac contained incarcerated omentum
rotation at the symphysis pubis [ 128 ] . This procedure leads to an increase in the distance between the edge of the rectus abdominis muscle and the inguinal and pectineal ligaments. There is a consequent weakening in the posterior wall of the inguinal canal. The angle between the midline (and, therefore, the lateral edge of the rectus muscle) and the superior ramus of the pubis is increased by a minimum of 5° when compared to the opposite side, and there is also an increase in the dis­tance from the pubic tubercle to the anterior superior iliac spine. These changes alter the anatomy of the inguinofemoral
region predisposing to hernia. It must be stressed that a con­sequent hernia is rare and undoubtedly compensatory remod­eling of the soft tissues occurs as the child develops after the traumatic procedure (Fig. 3.13 ). Any earlier musculoskeletal surgery, iatrogenic or not, in the region of the groin can lead to the later unusual groin herniation (Fig.
3.14 ).
The use of autologous bone grafts from the iliac crest is also troublesome. When full thickness grafts are taken from the posterior iliac crest, the inferior lumbar triangle is enlarged
693 Epidemiology and Etiology of Primary Groin Hernias
Table 3.4 Severity of abdominal wall injury
Description Grade Incidence (%) Tissue bruising/contusion I 54 Muscle(s) hematoma II 28 Single-layer disruption III 8 Complete-layer disruption IV 8 IV with herniation V 2 IV with evisceration VI 0
Data from Dennis et al . [ blunt trauma
130 ] based on CT scans in 1,549 patients with
predisposing to herniation. These “iatrogenic” lumbar hernias cause backache and can be complicated by irreducibility and strangulation and should be repaired [ 129 ] . Bone grafts from the anterior iliac crest are similarly complicated by later her­niation and require corrective surgery (Fig.
3.15 ).
Truly blunt traumatic abdominal wall hernias may occur after both low- (falls) or high-“energy” (motor vehicle accidents) impact injuries. Despite the use of early CT scanning, the mechanism of injury is vitally important, and a high index of suspicion is necessary when managing such patients. High­energy trauma cases may need urgent laparotomy for concomi­tant intra-abdominal injuries, whereas in low impact injuries local wound toilet, debridement, and immediate repair may suf fi ce. In a review of 1,549 CT scans from a level I trauma center, abdominal wall injuries were graded as to their severity with respect to the documented disruption of the layers of the abdominal wall [
130 ] . Overall abdominal wall injuries occurred
in 9% of cases (Table 3.4 ) with those at risk of later herniation (not necessarily in the groin) estimated to be 16%. The role of subsequent follow-up CT scanning may well de fi ne the place of “early vs . late” repair of these injuries. To date the later repairs of such hernias should probably be undertaken through a preperitoneal approach so that the anatomy, or lack of it, can be best appreciated.

Exertion and Groin Herniation

There is no fi rm evidence that strong muscular or strenuous athletic exertion causes inguinal hernia in the absence of a fascial and/or muscular abnormality—either acquired con­nective tissue disease or congenital anomaly of the abdomi­nal wall. Indeed, inguinal hernias (as opposed to sliding hiatal hernias) are rare in weight lifters [ 131 ] . However, in a study of inguinal hernia and a “single strenuous event,” in which 129 patients with a total of 145 inguinal hernias were included, in 7% the hernia was subjectively attributable to a single muscular strain [ gested guidelines to assist in assessing “causation” in work­related compensation claims in such patients, which included the following four recommendations:
132 ] . Indeed these authors sug-
1. The patient should have made an of fi cial report of the incident of muscular strain.
2. Severe groin pain must have been experienced at the time of the strain.
3. The diagnosis of hernia should preferably have been made within 3 days of the incident (or certainly within 30 days).
4. There should be no previous history of inguinal hernia. Interestingly, a recent similar study, using structured
postal questionnaires, suggested that inguinal herniation may be attributed to a single event in a similar proportion of patients [
133 ] , but another report questions the appearance
of a hernia (of any type) after such an event [ 134 ] .
At the moment, the relative importance of genetic, ana-
tomic, and environmental (smoking and heavy manual work) factors cannot be construed in each case. Manual work or strain is never, or very rarely, the sole cause of inguinal her- niation; it may however reveal an underlying previously asymptomatic one of which our patient was “clearly” unaware of.
Recent research suggests that persistent straining and
heavy work is relevant (but not causal) to the development of groin hernia. Recent European research has stressed these environmental factors rather than congenital defects in hernia development [ 135, 136 ] . In man and many mammalian quad­rupeds, there is an abstinence of the posterior rectus sheath below the arcuate line (of Douglas) and an “ineffectual” trans­versalis fascia in the groin. Gravitational stresses, while in the erect posture, amplify this hindrance of weakness, which is an evolved anatomical defect [ 137 ] . The etiology of groin hernia also has importance in terms of prevention; smoking is a causal agent but possibly less so in women [ 138 ] .
In medicolegal terms, the situation remains somewhat
confused—an accident or heavy strain at work is generally construed as a causal factor in the onset of a hernia, and in British courts damages are usually awarded. Our current understanding of the etiology of inguinal hernias casts doubt on judicial reasoning in many cases. The legal foun­dation for compensating a workman who develops a hernia after an accident at his workplace is the commission of a tort or breach of contract by his employer. The heads of damages awarded are for pain or suffering, loss of ameni­ties (usually sex life), pecuniary loss, medical expenses, and loss of later earning capacity. The role of a preexisting disability, patent processus vaginalis or metastatic emphy­sema, will need offsetting against these “damages.” This is de fi nitely a task for the judiciary, being largely unrelated to the observations of natural science [ 139 ] . Nevertheless in preparing a medicolegal report, surgeons and other medical experts must carefully examine all the contemporaneous medical records to support a claim. If there is insuf fi cient evidence to support a claim, they have a duty to the court to nullify the plaintiff’s claim and associated litigation [ 134, 140 ] . Finally the risk of a “work-related” hernia causes many