Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5805_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
ab
1
23
7.3 Median Cleft Lip andPalate
63
NB
PM
V
Fig. 7.16 2D vs. 3D midsagittal section in bilateral CLP
+4
at 12
weeks. (a) (TAS) midsagittal section, presence of maxillary gap (arrowhead) with the vomer mimicking the maxillary line. (b) (TVS) 3D midsagittal section shows that the vomer is seen in the superior plane, and the sec-
M
a
PM
V
M
ondary palate is absent. Note that the area shown by the yellow dot depicts the absence of the secondary palate. Nasal bone (NB), Vomer (V), Premaxilla (PM), and Mandible (M). (Video 7.5)
ML
Fig. 7.17 (a) TUI in complete bilateral CLP 13+6 weeks (TVS) In midsagittal view (section 2) the maxillary line (ML) is formed by premaxilla and vomer, in parasagittal sections (section 1 and 3), there is complete absence of maxillary line (arrow). (b) TUI in bilateral CLP with intact secondary palate 13
+3
weeks (TVS). Interrupted
maxillary line is seen in midsagittal and parasagittal view (section 1, 2, and 3) premaxillary protrusion (arrow) sec­ondary palate (pointer). In parasagittal sections (section 1and 3), the posterior portion of the maxillary line (pointer) is visible
64
23
7 Protocol forDiagnosing Type andExtent ofaCleft inFirst Trimester
b
Fig. 7.17 (continued)
1
midline defect in the lip is very subtle and is dem­onstrated in 3D image with VCI (Fig. 7.27d). Figure 7.27e shows rendered view of the face, and Fig.7.27f illustrates multiplanar imaging in median CLP.Video 7.7 multiplanar imaging in median CLP illustrating the defect in three orthogonal planes.
TUI in median CLP shows the maxillary line in midsagittal and parasagittal sections, the mid­sagittal section shows a small line posteriorly which is the vomer, and the parasagittal sections show a complete absence of maxillary line (Fig.7.28).
Figure 7.29 is an illustration of ipped face technique to render the palate in median CLP.Note that the vomer is seen in the midline, and there is a midline defect in the alveolar arch.
Figure 7.30a is an illustration of sagittal sec­tions in mediolateral CLP.Coronal sections in 2D and 3D (Fig. 7.30c and d) show complete absence of the base of RNT. The axial views (Fig. 7.30e and f) show a large mediolateral defect involving the secondary palate in 2D and 3D, respectively.
Figure 7.31 is an illustration of median CLP in holoprosencephaly. The sagittal view in Fig.7.31a illustrates at facial prole with a complete absence of the maxillary line. Axial and coronal views depict the midline defect (Fig.7.31b and c). Figure7.31d shows the rendered view of the face, and Fig.7.31e shows the fused choroid plexus in holoprosencephaly. Video 7.8 demonstrates the complete absence of the maxillary line in a case of holoprosencephaly at 14weeks.
7.3 Median Cleft Lip andPalate
a
b
65
Fig. 7.18 Postnatal correlation vs. 3D rendering in two cases of bilateral CLP. (TVS) (a) 13weeks. (b) 12weeks. Note the appearance of premaxillary protrusion in the rendered face as early as 12–13weeks of gestation
The appearance of the sagittal sections in
median CLP depends on the degree of the palatal shelf separation. Most often, the midsagittal sec-
tion shows only the posterior aspect of the max­illary line, which is the vomer (Fig.7.32a). In the
parasagittal section, there can either be a com­plete absence of maxillary line or only the proxi-
mal portion of the line corresponding to the alveolar arch may be visible.
When one moves from one side to the other to obtain the midsagittal section, the ultrasound beam may pass through the vomer alone or may pass through the alveolar arch and the vomer giv­ing the appearance of either shortened or inter-
66
7 Protocol forDiagnosing Type andExtent ofaCleft inFirst Trimester
a
NB
ML
c
b
M
d
*
*
e
Fig. 7.19 Complete bilateral CLP with no maxillary gap
+6
at 13
weeks (TAS) (a) No maxillary gap evident in the
midsagittal view, premaxillary protrusion (arrow).(Video
7.6) (b) Parasagittal section depicting the complete absence of maxillary line caudal to premaxilla (arrow). (c)
Axial view shows bilateral cleft (arrows) in the alveolar margin with premaxillary protrusion. (d) Defect in the base of the RNT (arrows), (e) (TVS) Rendered view of the face. Nasal bone (NB), mandible (M), maxillary line (ML), * denotes vomer
de

7.4 Atypical Cleft

67
abc
NB
ML
M
PM
PM
**
Fig. 7.20 Complete bilateral CLP with no demonstrable maxillary gap at 13 weeks. (TVS) (a) Midsagittal view showing single line and no gap. (b) Absence of maxillary line in parasagittal view (arrow) posterior to premaxilla (PM) (c) Bilateral defect in the lip (arrows) in coronal
view (d) (TAS) Omni view demonstrating cleft in the sec­ondary palate (*) (e) Rendered image of the face showing bilateral cleft lip. Nasal bone (NB), Maxillary line (ML), Mandible (M)
rupted maxillary line (Fig. 7.32b). Note in all
7.4 Atypical Cleft
sections, there is an “absent superimposed line sign” [12].
Figure 7.33 is a line diagram illustrating the
2D markers in sagittal, axial, and coronal planes.
A suspicion in the 2D planes should prompt one for an extended 3D evaluation of the palate.
Amniotic band syndrome causes bizarre atypical clefts that do not correspond to any anatomic pat­tern. Figure 7.34 depicts images of an atypical cleft in amniotic band syndrome, where only the distal posterior portion of the palate remains [1].
68
7 Protocol forDiagnosing Type andExtent ofaCleft inFirst Trimester
a
NB
V
P
M
c
PM
v
b
PM
V
d
V
P
Fig. 7.21 Superimposed line sign and maxillary gap in bilateral CLP (13
+6
weeks midsagittal section TAS) (a) normal appearance of superimposed line, vomer (V) at the posterior aspect of the maxillary line, (b) absence of superimposed line sign with no gap in complete bilateral
CLP. (c) single line and maxillary gap (arrowhead) in complete bilateral CLP (d) (TVS) maxillary gap (arrow­head) and presence of superimposed line sign in cleft with intact secondary palate. Premaxilla (PM), palate (P), Nasal bone (NB), Mandible (M)
7.4 Atypical Cleft
69
a
de
PM
b
c
f
V
g
h
i
Fig. 7.22 Bilateral CLP at 12weeks with follow-up at 15weeks and postnatal correlation (12weeks TAS a, b, and c) (a) Midsagittal section presence of maxillary gap (arrowhead) (b) axial section bilateral paramedian defect (arrows). (c) Coronal section defect in base of RNT (arrows). (15weeks d, e, and f). (d) Midsagittal section premaxillary protrusion (PM), Vomer (V) (e) Parasagittal
section complete absence of maxillary line caudal to pre­maxilla (arrow denotes premaxilla). (f) Axial section bilateral paramedian defect (pointer). (Postnatal images g, h, and i) (g) Prole view illustrating PMP. (h) Bilateral paramedian clefts in the upper lip. (i) Vomeropremaxillary junction and cleft extension into the secondary palate
70
7 Protocol forDiagnosing Type andExtent ofaCleft inFirst Trimester
a
*
*
*
*
*
*
b
*
*
c
Fig. 7.23 Rendered view of the intraoral surface of the palate illustrating variations in bilateral CLP. (a) Note the varying degree of palatal shelf separation in cases of bilat­eral CLP (*) points to separated palatal shelves. (b) 13 weeks (TVS) Note that the bilateral paramedian cleft
+3
extends to the premaxilla alone and does not involve the secondary palate (highlighted in green). (c) 13 (TVS) Note that the cleft extends into the secondary palate (highlighted in green), the nasal septum (vomer) is seen in the midline as there is a cleft of the secondary palate
+6
weeks
MIDSAGITTAL PARASAGITTAL
bc
7.4 Atypical Cleft
a
71
SAGITTAL
d
e
PMP
VB
P
MIDSAGITTAL PARASAGITTAL
PMP
VB
AXIAL
PMP
PMP
CORONAL
Fig. 7.24 Line diagram illustrating the 2D markers in the (a, b, and c) sagittal, axial, and coronal planes in bilateral CLP. (d) Bilateral CLP involving the premaxilla alone. (e) Complete bilateral CLP
72
7 Protocol forDiagnosing Type andExtent ofaCleft inFirst Trimester
a
b
Fig. 7.25 Phenotypic variations in bilateral cleft lip and palate. (a) 12
PMP
PMP
+4
weeks (TVS) bilateral CLP with axial sec­tion shows midline extension into the secondary palate (arrows) and midsagittal section showing the premaxillary protrusion (arrow) and maxillary gap (arrowhead), Nasal
NB
M
NB
ML
M
bone (NB), and Mandible (M). (b) 13
+6
weeks (TAS) bilateral CLP with axial section shows midline extension into the secondary palate (arrows) and midsagittal section showing subtle premaxillary protrusion (arrow), maxil­lary line (ML)