Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5805_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
29 Мб
Скачать
156
12 Syndromes andAssociations
a
b
c
*
d
*
e
f
*
g
*
Fig. 12.1 Median CLP with holoprosencephaly at 19weeks (TAS). (a) midsagittal section at facial prole with absence of maxillary line (arrowhead) (b) median cleft lip (*) (c) absent nose with arrow points to the
Increased uid in the posterior fossa can be a subtle marker for aneuploidy. Figure 12.6 is an example of bilateral CLP with increased nuchal translucency and increased uid in the posterior fossa. The association of aneuploidy markers
along with bilateral CLP in the rst trimester
depression between the orbits (d) coronal section defect (*) in base of RNT (e) Rendered view of the face (f) post­natal correlation (g) Cup-shaped monoventricle (*), axial view of intracranium
emphasizes the need for early genetic testing at 11–14weeks itself.
The degree of associated brain malformation in CLP can range from major abnormalities like holoprosencephaly or minor abnormality like agenesis of the corpus callosum. (Fig.12.7).
ef
12.1 Fetal Brain inOrofacial Clefts
157
a
c
b
A
M
M
d
CP
T
Fig. 12.2 Median CLP with holoprosencephaly at 13weeks. (a) Midsagittal section at facial prole with absence of maxillary line (arrowhead) (b) coronal section defect(*) in base of RNT (c) Midline line interruption (arrow) of the alveolar arch (d) Axial section depressed
nasal bridge (pointer). (e) Crux defect (dotted arrow) of heart indicating AVSD. (f) Fused thalami with absence of midline falx. (g) Rendered view of face. (h) Fused choroid plexues in holoprosencephaly. Choroid plexus (CP), Thalamus (T), Apex (A) and Mandible (M)
158
cd
12 Syndromes andAssociations
g
Fig. 12.2 (continued)
a
h
CP
b
NB
V
*
M
MV
Fig. 12.3 Bilateral CLP with holoprosencephaly at 22weeks (a) Midsagittal prole illustrating premaxillary protrusion. (b) Defect (*) in premaxilla. (c) Coronal view
median process (M) with bilateral paramedian cleft (arrows). (d) Cup-shaped monoventricle (MV) in holo­prosencephaly. Nasal bone (NB), Vomer (V)
cd
12.2 Common Syndromes Associated withClefts andMicrognathia
159
a
UL
N
b
*
UL
C
*
C
V
BS
Fig. 12.4 Mediolateral CLP with DWM at 21weeks (a) Nose chin view illustrating labial defect (*). (b) Axial view lateralized defect (arrow) in alveolar arch. (c) Axial view intracranium open fourth ventricle (*) with commu-
Approximately 50% of cases born with cleft palate occur as part of a known genetic syndrome or with another malformation (e.g., congenital
nication between cisterna magna and fourth ventricle. (d) Midsagittal section illustrating hypoplastic and rotated vermis (V). Nose (N), Upper lip (UL), Brain stem (BS) and cerebellum (C)
dactyly syndrome. Figure12.10 illustrates unilat- eral CLP in a case of Goldenhar Gorlin syndrome.
heart defects), and the other half occur as solitary defects, referred to often as nonsyndromic clefts.
The most common syndrome associated with isolated cleft palate is velocardiofacial syn­drome (VCFS). This syndrome is a result of
12.2 Common Syndromes Associated withClefts andMicrognathia
microdeletions of chromosome 22q11. Figure 12.8 is an illustration of bilateral CLP associated with double outlet right ventricle and single umbilical artery.
Orofacial cleft can be associated with chromo­somal syndromes, monogenic syndromes, as a part of a sequence and multiple congenital anom­alies of unknown origin. Figure12.9 illustrates median cleft lip associated with short rib poly-
Micrognathia is the most commonest association with orofacial cleft. Micrognathia can be associ­ated with about 270 syndromes and malforma­tions. The common syndromes associated with cleft of the secondary palate are Pierre Robins syndrome, Stickler syndrome, Monosomy 22q11 or DiGeorge Syndrome and Treacher Collins syndrome.
160
ef
12 Syndromes andAssociations
a
NB
ML
b
N
UL
UL
*
c
d
*
CP
*
Fig. 12.5 Bilateral CLP with posterior fossa cyst at 13weeks. (TVS) (a) Midsagittal prole illustrating maxil­lary gap (arrow) and premaxillary protrusion. (b) Nose chin view illustrating paramedian clefts (arrowheads). (c) Axial view illustrating the median process and bilateral
CP
paramedian clefts (arrows). (d) Rendered view of the face. (e) Dangling choroid plexuses (CP) ventriculomegaly. (f) Sagittal section showing increased uid (*) in the poste­rior fossa. Nasal bone (NB), Maxillary line (ML), Nose (N), Upper lip (UL)
cd

12.3 Pierre Robin Syndrome

161
a
b
MG
V
*
Fig. 12.6 Bilateral CLP with increased NT and increased uid in the posterior fossa at 13 weeks. (a) Axial view illustrating complete bilateral CLP (arrows points to bilat­eral paramedian defects). (b) Midsagittal view of fossa
As external ear anomalies such as anotia or microtia are common features in Treacher Collins syndrome, evaluation of external ears should be included during the ultrasound examination.
Pierre Robins syndrome is a neonatal emer­gency due to the associated airway obstruction caused by glossoptosis.
12.3 Pierre Robin Syndrome
showing maxillary gap (MG). (c) Increased uid (*) in the posterior fossa. (d) Increased nuchal translucency (arrows), Vomer (V)
for preparing the delivery team for a possible respiratory emergency.
Several studies using standardized objective methods for diagnosing micrognathia and iso­lated cleft palate have been proposed. Inferior facial angle is used in the mid trimester to iden­tify micrognathia. The cleft of the posterior
palate is difcult to identify in mid trimester as there is also glossoptosis.
Mid trimester suspicion of this syndrome is mainly on the identication of micrognathia
PRS is a rare congenital malformation character­ized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. A “U”-shaped cleft of the second-
ary palate is noted in about 90% of cases with PRS [10]. Prenatal suspicion of PRS is essential
and glossoptosis. The cleft of the secondary pal-
ate is most often conned to the posterior part of the secondary palate and is often difcult to visu­alize on the antenatal scan. Hence mostly, this syndrome is identied postnatally. There can be
162
a
b
12 Syndromes andAssociations
N
UL
c
e
UL
d
*
f
g
Fig. 12.7 Mediolateral cleft associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum. (a) Nose chin view mediolateral defect (*). (b) Axial view midline interruption in the alveo­lar arch (arrow). (c) Rendered view of the face. (d) Hypertelorism. (e) Axial view depicting the absence of CSP and steer horn appearance of frontal horns (arrowheads),
h
Probst bundles (*). (f) Coronal view depicting the absence of corpus callosum and CSP.The widely separated frontal horns (arrowheads) with Probst bundles (*) are seen. (g) Complete absence of hypoechoic band of tissue, the corpus callosum in midsagittal view. (h) Abnormal course of ante­rior cerebral artery with the absence of pericallosal artery
12.3 Pierre Robin Syndrome
163
a
b
*
*
dc
BL
*
*
Fig. 12.8 Bilateral CLP with DORV and single umbili­cal artery at 14 weeks. (a) Axial view bilateral CLP (arrows). (b) Parallel outow tracts (*). (c) Two great ves-
associated polyhydramnios in the third trimester in a substantial number of cases [1012].
Recent literature has quoted many signs to identify cleft palate in the rst trimester. The maxillary gap sign and shortening of PMD are known markers to identify isolated cleft of the secondary palate. The recent sign which focused on the vomeromaxillary junction to identify cleft of secondary palate is absent superimposed line sign [13].
As the cleft in PRS is most often posteriorly located and does not extend anteriorly, neither is the maxillary gap evident, nor is there a short­ening of PMD (Fig. 12.11a). As the superim-
posed line sign throws light on the posterior
sels (*) originating from the right ventricle. (d) Single umbilical artery, Bladder (BL)
aspect of maxillary line it can identify the poste­rior defect in the secondary palate, which is a hallmark feature in PRS.It is one of the key fea­tures which leads to a suspicion of PRS if micro­gnathia is identied at 11–14weeks scan.
The other sign for retrognathia in the rst tri-
mester is the absent mandibular gap sign seen in the retronasal triangle view. The mandible appears as two dots below the base of RNT in normal cases, and in retrognathia, the two dots fuse together in midline obliterating the normal mandibular gap [14]. In Fig.12.11b, the coro­nal view shows the absence of the mandibular gap, which conrms the presence of retrogna­thia in PRS.
164
de
12 Syndromes andAssociations
a
bc
de f
UL
UL
Fig. 12.9 Median CLP with SRPS at 13+3 weeks. (a) Median cleft lip (arrow). (b) Occipital encephalocele (arrow). (c) Narrow thorax and small omphalocele
LL
(arrow). (d) and (e) Shortening of all four limbs. (f) Polydactyly. Upper limb (UL), Lower limb (LL)
a b c
UL
LL
M
Fig. 12.10 Goldenhar Gorlin syndrome (a) Unilateral microphthalmos (arrow) (b) Abnormal ear tag (arrow) (c) Micrognathia (d) Cleft (arrow) alveolar arch (e) Rendered
view of the face, Goldenhar syndrome-hemifacial micro­somia. Mandible (M)
cd
12.3 Pierre Robin Syndrome
165
a
NB
ML
M
b
A
M
M
Fig. 12.11 Micrognathia in Pierre robin syndrome at 13 weeks. (a) Receding chin (M), absent superimposed line sign (ML). (b) Absence of mandibular gap (arrow).
Another characteristic feature in PRS is the shape of the mandible, which has a U-shaped
appearance instead of the normal V shape. The axial view of the mandible on 3D evaluation appears like a boomerang in PRS (Fig.12.11c).
In PRS, micrognathia is more prominent in the rst trimester, thus the receding chin in the mid­sagittal prole of the face can easily be identied (Fig.12.11a, d).
Figure 12.12 illustrates the rendered axial view of a normal palate and cleft of the secondary palate using the ipped face view.
The additional nding in PRS, which is glos­soptosis is an important component of the syn­drome as this causes airway obstruction postnatally [15]. In PRS the tongue is vertically
(c) Multiplanar image illustrating the mandible (reference dot). (d) Rendered view of the face. Mandible (M), Nasal bone (NB) and Apex (A)
positioned and falls back on the airway, creating a neonatal emergency.
This vertically positioned tongue can be
identied in the rst trimester itself, as shown in
Fig.12.13. Note the presence of amniotic uid in the oral cavity, which outlines the tongue which is placed behind the mandible. Video 12.1 illus­trates the abnormal tongue movement in PRS.
The presence of micrognathia along with absent superimposed line sign and abnormal tongue position are the ultrasound markers for the diagnosis of Pierre Robin Syndrome in the rst trimester.
Recurrence of this syndrome can also be diagnosed early in gestation with these mark­ers, which aids in planning further course of