Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3711_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать
31 Acute Aortic Thrombosis
https://t.me/med1917
425
11. Gologorsky E, Andrews DM, Gologorsky A, Sampathi V, Sundararaman L, Govindaswamy R, Ravch Y, Izakis AG, Pretto EA Jr. Devastating intracardiac and aortic thrombosis: a case report of apparent catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome during liver transplantation. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:398–402.
12. Akil MA, Kaya H, Ertas F, Bilik MZ.Mineeld in the aorta: a rare case of thrombus. Turk Kardiyol Din Ars. 2013;41(3):266.
13. Kaschwich M, Behrendt CA, Tsilimparis N, Kölbel T, Wipper SH, Debus ES.Management of acute aortic thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;58(2):313–20.
14. Ha SJ, Oh JH, Kim SJ.Unexpected development of acute abdomi­nal aortic thrombosis during percutaneous coronary intervention. Korean J Intern Med. 2014;29(5):664–6.
15. Verma H, Meda N, Vora S, George RK, Tripathi RK.Contemporary management of symptomatic primary aortic mural thrombus. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(6):1524–34.
16. Metsemakers WJ, Duchateau J, Vanhoenacker F, Tulemans Y, DeLursnyder J. Floating aortic thrombus: the endovascular approach. Acta Chir Belg. 2013;113(1):47–50.
Management ofAortic Atherothrombi
https://t.me/med1917
RuojiaDebbieLi, LuisFelipeGomez, SashiK.Inkollu, MarkG.Rabbat, andCarlosF.Bechara
32
Atherosclerotic Lesions: Types ofPlaque
The formation of plaque starts with the development of ath­erosclerosis, a slow process that takes years to reach a criti­cal point but can become catastrophic within minutes [1]. Some plaque will remain stable, but others will be prone to rupture and cause complications [2]. The plaques that tend to rupture more are characterized by having a large lipid core and a thin brous cap. Originally thought differently, athero­sclerosis is now considered a dynamic process and plaques can progress or regress, and this is believed to be inuenced by modication of risk factors.
Plaques that develop in the aortic arch are among the main causes of stroke and peripheral emboli. Pujadas Capmany et al. found that there is a high risk of embolic events when complex aortic arch plaques are present; this was dened as a plaque thicker than 4mm or with mobile components. They found that the risk is elevated in ulcerated plaques or hypoechoic plaques which likely represent the presence of high lipid content [3].
The American Heart Association provided a denition of the advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histo­logical classication of atherosclerosis [4] (Table 32.1). The main growth mechanism of lesion types I–IV is due to
R. D. Li Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA
L. F. Gomez Vascular Surgery Department, Houston Methodist Hospital, DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
S. K. Inkollu Vascular Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
M. G. Rabbat Medicine and Radiology, Division of Cardiology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA
C. F. Bechara Aortic Center, Vascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
(*)
Table 32.1 Lesion histology and classication [4]
Histology and classication Characteristics
Type I– Initial Isolated macrophage foam cells Type II– Fatty streak Type III– Intermediate Type IV– Atheroma Type V– Fibroatheroma
Type VI– Complicated
Mainly intracellular lipid accumulation
Type II changes + small extracellular lipid pools Type II changes + core of extracellular lipid
Lipid core and brotic layer, or multiple lipid cores and brotic layers, or mainly calcic, or mainly brotic Surface defect, hematoma-hemorrhage, thrombus
lipid accumulation, type V due to accelerated smooth mus­cle and collagen increase, and type VI due to thrombosis and hematoma.
Cardiovascular disease associated with atherosclerotic changes is still the leading cause of death in the world, with the exception of the sub-Saharan African region. Because of the advancement in understanding atherosclerotic disease, there has been a growth in disease prevalence, which places a nancial burden to the health system. Describing specic costs goes beyond the scope of this chapter.
Despite the different manifestations of atherosclerotic dis­ease and the systems affected, such as aortoiliac disease, aneurysms, symptomatic carotid disease, or coronary artery disease, the lesions associated with it have a lot in common. It starts with the accumulation of cholesterol in the arterial wall with different degrees and characteristics of plaque that ulti­mately lead to the ischemic manifestations of the disease.
Medical advances in diagnosis and imaging have helped us obtain a better understanding of the progression of the dis­ease, which in turn has helped develop new treatment and management strategies. Regardless of the treatment, either open or endovascular, medical management is added to ensure long-term results. Newer imaging techniques can detect unstable plaques that are more likely to result in rup­ture, thrombosis, and distal embolization. New risk factors
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 R. S. Dieter et al. (eds.), Diseases of the Aorta, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_32
427
428
R. D. Li et al.
https://t.me/med1917
for late progression have been identied separate from the traditional risk factors. These are elevated blood levels of bio­markers like inammatory cytokines, metalloproteinases, insulin, glucose, and other smooth muscle growth factors.
In a retrospective study by DeBakey etal. on the patterns of atherosclerosis in which they describe a review of 13,827 patients who were admitted one or more times at the Methodist Hospital in a medical center in Houston, Texas, between 1948 and 1983, they described ve categories of distribution of disease: (I) coronary arteries, (II) major branches of the aortic arch, (III) visceral arterial branches of the aorta, (IV) terminal abdominal aorta and its major branches, and (V) a combination of two or more of these categories at the same time. In this review, they described the progression of the disease as well as re-occurrence and development of disease in new sites other than the ones for which the patient had been originally treated [5]. Criqui etal. published on the mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease and found that there was a high risk of death from cardiovascular causes in patients with large-vessel peripheral arterial disease [6].
When planning for treatment, it is important to evaluate the type of lesion; a stable plaque that is causing some degree of ischemia distally is much safer than a plaque that has lots of atheroma debris under a thin cap. This is also affected by the vascular bed in which the lesion is located, as described by Herisson etal. where they compared carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaques and found that those plaques in the carotid arteries had more frequent brous cap atheroma whereas the plaque in the femoral arteries was more brocal­cic, and due to these characteristics, the results with treat­ment were different [7].
Endothelial dysfunction has been linked to the develop­ment of atherosclerotic lesions. Studies have found that ow- induced vasodilation is an endothelium-dependent process in humans, and it is mediated by nitric oxide. Interestingly, ow-induced vasodilation is markedly reduced in young patients with CAD [8]. These ndings propose that not only the vessels with atherosclerotic disease have endo­thelial dysfunction, but that it is more of a diffuse process and could perhaps be used as an early marker for the pro­gression of disease.
More recently, some studies have shown a connection between diseases that affect the endothelial function, advanced glycation end products, and protein kinases with alteration in vasodilation and contribution to the progression of atherosclerosis [9, 10].
The subendothelial space is where the atherogenic parti­cles will deposit and where macrophages and smooth muscle cells take in the particles and start the atherogenic process [11]. It is in this space where the proteoglycans present inter­act with low-density lipoprotein and its associated apolipo­proteins [12].
Aortic Thrombus
Arterial embolization is a problem that carries increased morbidity and mortality. Among the complications associ­ated with distal embolization are acute ischemia with an approximate rate of 13–14% and mortality with a rate of 9–12% [13]. The main cause of embolic events has been associated with alteration in cardiac rhythm either as a con­sequence of myocardial infarction, atrial brillation, endo­carditis, or after prosthetic valve replacement. When it comes to noncardiac pathology, the origin of these emboli is within the aorta, and it is due to aneurysmal degenera­tion, dissection, ulcers, or trauma. When they are found, most of them are in the abdominal aorta and the rest in the thoracic aorta [14].
On a paper published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery, it was found on autopsies that 0.45% of the patients who had a normal aorta had some degree of mural thrombus. From those patients, only 17% had evidence of distal emboliza­tion. Also, they found that 20% of those mural thrombi were present in the thoracic aorta [15]. Some studies have indi­cated that up to 15% of emboli may originate from a noncar­diac, unidentied focus [16].
Emboli may originate from any segment of the aorta from the arch to the aortoiliac bifurcation. These emboli can cause cerebrovascular accidents, mesenteric ischemia, renal isch­emia, and acute limb ischemia. Frequently, the thrombus is found because of the embolic event. These embolic events can occur spontaneously or as a complication from certain procedures such as endovascular interventions [17].
Diagnosis can be made with transesophageal echocardio­gram if the thrombus is present within the thoracic aorta and the heart. Katz etal. [18] recommend a ve-point grading system for aortic atheroma on transesophageal echocardiog­raphy reporting patients with a mobile atheroma had a 47% incidence of stroke (Table32.2).
The increased use of CT angiography has helped in the diagnosis as well as planning of management when indicated. There are other imaging modalities that can be used such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, intravascular ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, multiple-row detector CT, and positron emission tomography [19] (Figs.32.1, 32.2, 32.3,
32.4 and 32.5).
Table 32.2 TEE grading of aortic atheroma [18]
Grade Description 1 Normal aorta 0 2 Extensive intimal thickening <3mm 0 3 Protrudes <5mm into aortic lumen 5 4 Protrudes >5mm into aortic lumen 10.5 5 Mobile atheroma 46.5
Incidence of stroke (%)
32 Management ofAortic Atherothrombi
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 32.1 This patient presented with blue toe syndrome (emboli to the
feet) and was treated medically
429
a
b
Fig. 32.2 This patient developed acute left lower extremity. She was
found to have a 6cm abdominal aneurysm (AAA) and diffuse athero­sclerotic disease and was treated with open AAA repair and left leg embolectomy
Management of aortic thrombus is not well established due to the lack of available data. Usually, the initial man­agement consists of systemic anticoagulation if no contra­indications are present, aspirin, and then surgical intervention or long-term anticoagulation. In a study by Pagni etal., they found that half of the patients who devel­oped aortic thrombi without any predisposing condition had some sort of underlying and sometimes unrecognized hypercoagulable state. They also found that small lesions of less than 1 cm tended to respond more favorably to anticoagulation than larger lesions did [17]. The treatment will be detailed below and should aim at prevention of embolization and possible stabilization and resolution of the clot.
Fig. 32.3 This patient presented with abdominal pain and bilateral
renal infarcts. CT scan shows heavy thrombus burden at the level of the superior mesenteric artery and renal arteries (a). She was treated with oral anticoagulation. (b) is her repeat scan after 4weeks showing reduc­tion in the thrombus burden. She had no further embolic episodes
If the lesions are larger or freely mobile, surgical inter­vention might be warranted. Traditionally, open thrombec­tomy has been used. With the progress made in endovascular procedures, these have become more common. The location of the lesion determines the type of endograft to be used.
Medical Treatment
Atherothrombosis is the unhealthy coupling of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Atherosclerosis leads to many systemic dis­eases such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular dis­eases, aortic atherosclerosis, and peripheral arterial disease. Disease in one vascular bed increases the risk of disease in others which is known as “cross-link” [20]. One of the most detrimental consequences of atherosclerotic plaque is an embolic event especially in those suffering from signicant aortic atherosclerosis. These embolic events may be spontane­ous or induced by mechanical interventions such as guidewire or catheter manipulation during cardiac or peripheral vascular catheterization. The risk of embolism in aortic atherosclerosis is drastically increased for plaques that are mobile and/or pro­truding, especially if it is >4 mm in thickness [21]. These
430
https://t.me/med1917
R. D. Li et al.
Fig. 32.4 A young female presented with recurrent blue toe syndrome despite optimal medical management. The thoracic thrombus was covered
with a stent graft, and no further emboli occurred. She did well and was discharged home 3days later
including antiplatelet therapy, antihypertensive, anticoagula­tion, and statin medications.
Dual antiplatelet therapy has been shown to be an effec­tive treatment choice for secondary prevention. One of the most commonly used dual antiplatelet therapy medications is aspirin and clopidogrel. Aspirin binds to and irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX), which is the rst-step enzyme in the biosynthesis of prostaglandins in platelets. This effectively shuts down the formation of thromboxane A2 which is a potent platelet agonist and vasoconstricting substance. Clopidogrel is an adenosine diphosphate recep­tor antagonist on platelets that ultimately blocks platelet activation and aggregation. The Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration meta-analysis demonstrated aspirin alone
Fig. 32.5 Transesophageal echocardiogram of a complex atheroma in
aortic arch
yielded an absolute reduction of 3.1% in vascular event rates vs. control (12.9% vs. 16%) [23]. In the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial, a randomized comparison of clopidogrel
thromboemboli tend to lodge in small or medium arteries which often lead to stroke or TIA, limb ischemia, renal infarc­tion, intestinal ischemia, or other organ ischemia [22]. Since atherothrombosis is a progressive process with an inamma­tory component where platelet adhesion, activation, and aggregation are the nal stage that ultimately is responsible for arterial occlusion and ischemia, many drugs have been designed to target the various stages to provide primary and secondary prevention in the treatment of atherothrombosis
75mg and aspirin 325 mg, ADP receptor antagonists such as clopidogrel were associated with a signicant absolute reduction of 0.51% in the rate of the primary composite endpoint of MI, ischemic stroke, or vascular death com­pared with aspirin (5.32% vs. 5.83%; p = 0.043) [24]. However, evidence from the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial demonstrated that the combination of clopi­dogrel and aspirin was more effective than aspirin alone in
32 Management ofAortic Atherothrombi
https://t.me/med1917
431
reducing asymptomatic embolization [25]. The Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial evaluated the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in a broad population of high-risk patients including established MI, stroke, or PAD.While this trial attempted to explore the primary prevention of dual antiplatelet therapy which remained unclear, it did further concur the secondary prevention benets shown in previous trials [26].
Several studies have demonstrated possible efcacy of warfarin for secondary prevention in patient with aortic plaque. SPAF-III trial compared adjusted-dose warfarin with INR 2–3 to low-dose warfarin with INR 1.2–1.5 plus aspirin for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial brillation with at least one thromboembolic risk factor. They found that those treated with adjusted-dose warfarin had 4% incidence of stroke vs. 16% incidence in those with low-dose warfarin plus aspirin, which demonstrated a 75% risk reduction [27]. In another study in patients who had undergone transesopha­geal echo found to have protruding plaque, there were no embolic events in 27 patients who were treated with warfarin compared to clinical embolic events in 5 of the 23 patients who were treated with antiplatelet therapy [28]. Thus, these studies demonstrated a possible efcacy for warfarin in plaque stabilization.
Another important target for treating atherothrombosis is lipid-lowering therapy, specically statins. Statins are coen­zyme A reductase inhibitors which reduce atherothrombotic events through a variety of mechanisms including reduction of cholesterol biosynthesis, modulation of lipid metabolism, and a notable way to prevent thrombosis by improving endo­thelial homeostasis by increasing the bioavailability of nitric oxide that subsequently orchestrates the paracrine antiath­erosclerotic functions of the endothelium [29]. Tunick etal. demonstrated in their retrospective analysis of 519 patients that statin therapy was associated with an absolute reduction of 17% in thromboembolic events (12% vs. 29%) compared to those who were not treated with statins. This signied the clinical benet of statin-induced plaque stabilization [30]. Other studies attempted to evaluate possible regression of aortic plaque with imaging such as MRI.One trial was able to demonstrate the maximal wall thickness of thoracic aorta was reduced by 13.8% in combination therapy of atorvas­tatin and etidronate vs. 12.3% in patients who took atorvas­tatin vs. only 2.2% in those who took etidronate for 12 months. In the abdominal aorta, combination therapy showed 11.9% reduction in vessel wall thickness vs. 0.9% in atorvastatin group and 5.5% in the etidronate group [31]. Thus, statin therapy is imperative in the prevention and treat­ment of atherothrombosis.
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been shown as a key pathway modulating atherosclerotic plaque vulnerabil­ity. It is a series of enzymatic reactions that leads to the gen-
eration of angiotensin II which promotes vasoconstriction, aldosterone secretion, water and sodium reabsorption, thirst, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, and cardiac ionotropic and chronotropic actions [32]. There is emerging evidence indicating RAS might regulate all stages of athero­genesis, from initiation to disease progression including determining plaque vulnerability and rupture. Many studies have shown direct relationship between inammation and the RAS where activation of NF-kB by angiotensin II in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells induces the upregulation of cell adhesion molecules, which favor adhesion, tissue recruitment, and accumulation of inamma­tory cells. These inammatory cells can lead to intraplaque proliferation of macrophages and further increase cytokine and chemokine expression which result in a positive feed­back response. The persistent proinammatory state plays an essential role in the conversion of a stable atherosclerotic plaque into a vulnerable phenotype [32]. Thus, angiotensin­converting enzyme (ACEi) inhibitors play an important pro­tective role where it antagonizes atherogenesis and atheroprogression. While the exact mechanism behind ath­erosclerotic plaque stabilization with ACEi is not fully understood, ACEi are known to reduce formation of Ang II and increase bradykinin levels which result in increased NO release, thus attenuating the oxidation of LDL and inhibiting MMP-9 activity [33].
The current guideline for medical management of aortic atherosclerotic disease is consistent with the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines for anti­thrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease.
• For patients with no contraindications (low risk of major
bleeding) with stroke and complex aortic plaque, or
patient without stroke but atheroma with a mobile compo-
nent, medical therapy includes lipid-lowering therapy
plus aspirin monotherapy, or clopidogrel 75 mg daily
monotherapy is appropriate.
• For patients without stroke and simple plaque (<4 mm
without a mobile component), the evidence behind medi-
cal therapy is limited; however, they still recommend
lipid-lowering therapy plus aspirin or clopidogrel
monotherapy.
While warfarin may play a more signicant role in patient with atrial brillation or mechanical prosthetic valves in the setting of aortic atherosclerotic disease, it is generally not recommended in patients with stable aortic atheroma and thromboembolism. Based on nonrandomized retrospective studies, oral anticoagulation has shown benet in patients with mobile thrombi in the aortic arch; thus, the 2012 ACCP currently recommends oral anticoagulation in the setting of cryptogenic stroke and mobile aortic arch thrombi pending
432
https://t.me/med1917
R. D. Li et al.
ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing oral antico­agulant with antiplatelet therapy [34].
There are many different targets in the attenuation of the progression of atherothrombosis. Atherosclerotic plaque sta­bilization remains to be one of the most important goals in the treatment of atherothrombosis whether it is through pri­mary prevention or by secondary prevention using dual anti­platelet therapy, anticoagulation with warfarin, lipid-lowering drugs with statins, or ACEi. It is crucial to initiate the appro­priate treatment to minimize the detrimental consequences of atherothrombosis.
Surgical Intervention
Surgical management is another approach in the treatment of aortic atherothrombosis. Surgical interventions for aortic ath­erosclerosis include aortic replacement with interposition graft, thrombectomy if focal, and endovascular stenting. Wareing etal. assessed a strategy for reduction of stroke inci­dence in patients undergoing cardiac surgery by screening for ascending aorta atherosclerosis and carotid disease. For the purpose of this chapter, we will focus on atherosclerosis of the aorta and not the carotid arteries. They found that none of the 27 patients with moderate or severe atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta who had ascending aortic replacement had stroke, while 6.3% of 111 patients with moderate or severe disease who had only minor interventions had stroke. This study suggested that screening and aggressive surgical treat­ment could reduce the frequency of stroke in cardiac surgical patients [35]. However, interposition graft requires signicant consideration for myocardial, brain, spinal cord, and lower body protection and rigorous surgical technique. Thus, care­ful selection of surgical candidates needs to be done to limit mortality and morbidity. Another study compared interposi­tion graft in severe atherosclerosis group versus arterial can­nulation in mild or moderate atherosclerosis group and found that there was no signicant difference in mortality and stroke rate but there was a statistically signicant difference in oper­ation time, ICU stay, and hospital stay that were all longer in the interposition graft group [36]. This raises the question if interposition graft would ultimately be the optimal surgical option for patients with aortic atherosclerosis.
Another option for treating severe ascending aorta athero­sclerosis is endarterectomy. In one study, arch endarterec­tomy was performed in 268 patients undergoing heart surgery who were found to have >4mm aortic plaque in an effort to reduce intraoperative stroke risk; however, these patients ended up having higher rates of stroke than those who did not have endarterectomy (35% vs. 12%) as well as higher mortality rate and longer hospital stay [37]. Thus, aortic arch endarterectomy should not be recommended in patients with aortic atherosclerosis.
We have no randomized studies to suggest surgical treat­ment for emboli from sources such as the descending tho­racic aorta or the abdominal aorta, but the same principles apply. It is indicated for those who fail medical therapy and are at low risk of complications. In addition, endovascular therapy has replaced open surgical treatment for these ana­tomic areas when it is feasible. Endovascular treatment allows for intervention in patients who previously were con­sidered as nonsurgical candidates as well as carries a lower morbidity rate. The early results have shown 100% technical success, no early recurrences, and no wire- or device-related complications. However, several conditions should be con­sidered when approaching aortic atherosclerotic lesions [38]:
• Careful manipulation of wires to prevent iatrogenic
emboli
• Use of angiography and/or intravascular ultrasonography
to accurately identify and exclude the affected segment of
the aorta
• Planning of at least 1–2 cm proximal and distal landing
zones
• Postprocedural evaluation of mesenteric and lower
extremity vessels
Conclusion
Aortic atherosclerotic plaques are important potential sources of systemic emboli which can lead to signicant consequences such as stroke, transient ischemic attack, renal infarction, and embolization to other arterial beds that could lead to end-organ ischemia and, occasionally, require inter­vention such as renal thrombectomy for acute renal injury or popliteal thrombectomy for acute limb ischemia. The risk of thromboembolism in aortic atherosclerosis is increased when there is a complex plaque which is dened as thick­ness>4mm or ulceration. Secondary prevention with vari­ous medications that target the atherosclerotic process has been used to prevent thromboembolism. These medications include lipid-lowering therapy with statins, anticoagulation therapy such as warfarin, antiplatelet therapy including aspi­rin and clopidogrel, and antihypertensive medications such as ACE inhibitors. Surgical treatment, open and endovascu­lar, should be reserved for those who fail medical treatment and at low risk for complications.
References
1. Kips JG, Segers P, Van Bortel LM. Identifying the vulnerable
plaque: a review of invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities. Artery Res. 2008;2:21–34.
32 Management ofAortic Atherothrombi
https://t.me/med1917
433
2. Kronzon I, Tunick PA.Aortic atherosclerotic disease and stroke. Circulation. 2006;114:63–75.
3. Capmany RP, Ibañez MO, Pesquer XJ. Complex atheromato­sis of the aortic arch in cerebral infarction. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6:184–93.
4. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, etal. A denition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classication of atherosclerosis. A report From the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355–74.
5. DeBakey ME, Lawrie GM, Glaeser DH.Patterns of atherosclerosis and their surgical signicance. Ann Surg. 1985;201:115–31.
6. Criqui MH, Langer RD, Fronek A, Feigelson HS, Klauber MR, McCann TJ, etal. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:381–6.
7. Herisson F, Heymann MF, Chetiveaux M, Charrier C, Battaglia S, Pilet P, etal. Carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaques have dif­ferent morphology. Atherosclerosis. 2011;216:348–54.
8. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung A, etal. Flow-induced vasodilation of the human brachial artery is impaired in patients <40 years of age with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:1210–4.
9. Ren X, Ren L, Wei Q, Shao H, Chen L, Liu N.Advanced glycation end-products decreases expression of endothelial nitric oxide syn­thase through oxidative stress in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:52.
10. Yang L, Cong HL, Wang SF, Liu T.AMP-activated protein kinase mediates the effects of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 on endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13:1622–9.
11. Camejo G, Hurt-Camejo E, Wiklund O, Bondjers G.Association of apo B lipoproteins with arterial proteoglycans: pathological signi­cance and molecular basis. Atherosclerosis. 1998;139:205–22.
12. Camejo G, Fager G, Rosengren B, Hurt-Camejo E, Bondjers G. Binding of low density lipoproteins by proteoglycans synthe­sized by proliferating and quiescent human arterial smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:14131–7.
13. Eliason JL, Wainess RM, Proctor MC, Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, et al. A National and Single Institutional Experience in the con­temporary treatment of acute lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg. 2003;238:382–90.
14. Abbott WM, Maloney RD, McCabe CC, Lee CE, Wirthlin LS. Arterial embolism: A 44-year perspective. Am J Surg. 1982;143:460–4.
15. Verma H, Meda N, Vora S, George RK, Tripathi RK.Contemporary management of symptomatic primary aortic mural thrombus. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60:1524–34.
16. Khouzam RN, Salama L, Sou MK, Khandekar A, Al-Mawed S.Showers of emboli from a large aortic root thrombus. J La State Med Soc. 2014;166:138–42.
17. Pagni S, Trivedi J, Ganzel BL, Williams M, Kapoor N, Ross C, Slater AD.Thoracic aortic mobile thrombus: is there a role for early surgical intervention? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:1875–81.
18. Katz ES, Tunick PA, Rusine H, Ribakove G, Spencer FC, Kronzon I. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraop­erative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:70–7.
19. Owen DRJ, Lindsay AC, Choudhury RP, Fayad ZA.Imaging of Atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:25–40.
20. Ellahham S.Role of antiplatelet agents in the primary and second­ary prevention of atherothrombotic events in high risk-patients. South Med J. 2008;101:273–83.
21. Karalis D, Quinn V, Victor MF, Ross JJ, Polansky M, Spratt KA, etal. Risk of catheter-related emboli in patients with atherosclerotic debris in the thoracic aorta. Am Heart J. 1996;131:1149–55.
22. Tunick PA, Kronzon I.Atheromas of the thoracic aorta: clinical and therapeutic update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:545–54.
23. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta­analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324:71–86.
24. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet. 1996;348(9038):1329–39.
25. Markus HS, Droste DW, Kaps M, Larrue V, Lees KR, Siebler M, Ringelstein EB. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopido­grel and aspirin in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using Doppler embolic signal detection: the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial. Circulation. 2005;111(17):2233–40.
26. Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Kacke W, Berger PB, Black HR, Boden WE, etal. A global view of atherothrombosis: baseline characteristics in the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial. Am Heart J. 2005;150:401.
27. Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, xed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial brillation: stroke prevention in atrial brillation III randomized clinical trial. Lancet. 1996;7:633–8.
28. Ferrari E, Vidal R, Chevallier T, Baudouy M. Atherosclerosis of the thoracic aorta and aortic debris as a marker of poor prognosis: benet of oral anticoagulants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;35:1317–22.
29. Vaughan CJ.Prevention of stroke and dementia with statins: Effects beyond lipid lowering. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:23–9.
30. Tunick PA, Nayar AC, Goodkin GM, Mirchandani S, Francescone S, Rosenzweig BP, et al. Effect of treatment on the incidence of stroke and other emboli in 519 patients with severe thoracic aortic plaque. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1320–5.
31. Corti R, Fayad ZA, Fuster V, Worthley SG, Helft G, Chesebro J, et al. Effects of lipid-lowering by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a longitudinal study by high-resolu­tion, noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2001;104:249–52.
32. Da Silva AR, Fraga-Silva RA, Stergiopulos N, Montecucco F, Mach F.Update on the role of angiotensin in the pathophysiology of coro­nary atherothrombosis. Eur J Clin Investig. 2015;45:274–87.
33. Yoshida H, Kisugi R. Mechanisms of LDL oxidation. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1875–82.
34. Lansberg MG, O’Donnell MJ, Khatri P, Lang ES, Nguyen­Huynh MN, Schwartz NE, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombo­lytic therapy for ischemic stroke: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence- Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e601S–36S.
35. Wareing TH, Davila-Roman VG, Daily BB, Murphy SF, Schechtman KB, etal. Strategy for the reduction of stroke incidence in cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55:1400–7.
36. Yamanaka K, Nishina T, Kanemitsu N, Hirose K, Mizuno A, Nakatsuka D, et al. Total aortic arch replacement for severe ath­erosclerotic aortic aneurysms: consecutive 135 cases study. Kyobu Geka. 2013;66:948–51.
37. Stern A, Tunick PA, Culliford AT, Lachmann J, Baumann FG, Kanchuger MS, et al. Protruding aortic arch atheromas: risk of stroke during heart surgery with and without aortic arch endarterec­tomy. Am Heart J. 1999;138:746–52.
38. Scott DJ, White JM, Arthurs Z.Endovascular management of a mobile thoracic aortic thrombus following recurrent distal throm­boembolism: a case report and literature review. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:246–50.
Aortic Disease inPregnancy
https://t.me/med1917
CarolineA.Ball andSaraSirna
33
Introduction
Pregnancy represents a unique physiologic period, with sig­nicant implications on the cardiovascular system [1]. Although rare, aortic disease is a known potential complica­tion of pregnancy. Aortic dissection and rupture can be of particular concern for pregnant women with underlying con­nective tissue disorders [2]. In the next chapter, we will explore aortic disease in pregnancy, including pathophysiol­ogy, epidemiology, and specic conditions. We will pay par­ticular interest to aortic dissection and rupture, given the increased incidence in pregnancy, and the devastating poten­tial consequences.
Vascular Changes inPregnancy
Pregnancy causes a unique set of physiologic changes (Table33.1), which place an increased burden on the cardio­vascular system and the aorta [3]. Throughout a normal preg­nancy, there is a decrease in systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures. Compared to baseline, there is a 20–25% increase in heart rate over the course of pregnancy. Cardiac output also increases throughout pregnancy. Peripheral vas­cular resistance decreases, and there is systemic vasodilation in addition to increased vascular distensibility [2, 4].
Pregnancy is associated with an increase in vasomotor sympathetic activity [5], in addition to hormonal changes. Estrogen and progesterone increase vasodilation [4], as does relaxin, a hormone produced by the placenta [6]. Relaxin affects the cardiovascular and renal systems, increasing car­diac output and renal blood ow. Pregnancy increases angio­tensinogen, total blood volume, plasma volume, and red blood cell mass. It is also associated with an increased left ventricular thickness and wall mass [4].
C. A. Ball (*) · S. Sirna Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA
Table 33.1 Physiologic changes of pregnancy
Parameter Expected change Systemic
vascular resistance Blood pressure Decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Heart rate Increases by 20–25% over the course of
Cardiac output Increases throughout pregnancy Plasma volume Increases throughout pregnancy Aortic root diameter
The aorta undergoes structural changes during pregnancy, as well. The changes described above cause increased shear stress on the aortic wall, predisposing the aorta to aneurys­mal dilation and dissection [7]. In late pregnancy, the gravid uterus can cause aorto-iliac compression, resulting in increased peripheral resistance [8]. Pregnancy also affects the structural integrity of the aorta. Circulating estrogen and progesterone cause reticulin ber fragmentation and elastin ber disorganization [8]. Pregnancy is also associated with fragmentation of the reticulum bers of the aorta, loss of the normal corrugation of elastic bers, and hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the smooth muscle cells [3, 9, 10]. The aortic root increases in diameter by at least 1mm during a normal pregnancy. The peak diameter occurs in the third trimester [1]. In women with hypertension during pregnancy, the increase of the diameter is more pronounced [9].
Decreases throughout pregnancy
over the course of pregnancy, with a nadir in the second trimester
pregnancy
Increases throughout pregnancy
Epidemiology
Aortic dissection is a rare occurrence in normal pregnancy. In the United States, the incidence of aortic dissection in pregnancy is 0.0004%, based on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1988 to 2008. The study identied 44 cases of aortic dissection out of 10 million
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 R. S. Dieter et al. (eds.), Diseases of the Aorta, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_33
435
436
C. A. Ball and S. Sirna
https://t.me/med1917
pregnancies. Seven of the 44 patients who experienced a dissection had Marfan syndrome [11]. Aortic dissections that occur during pregnancy represent 0.1% of all cases of aortic dissection in the United States [11]. The risk of aortic dissection increases over the course of the pregnancy, with the greatest risk in the third trimester and postpartum [8]. Despite its rarity, the consequences to both mother and child can be devastating [12].
For women with underlying conditions that affect the aorta, the physiologic changes of pregnancy can further increase the risk of aortic dissection and rupture. For exam­ple, the risk of aortic dissection in women with Marfan syn­drome increases eightfold during pregnancy, particularly in the postpartum period [13].
There is limited data available on the incidence of aortitis in pregnancy. Takayasu arteritis, a rare form of large-vessel vasculitis, which is known to affect women of childbearing age, is neither affected nor worsened by pregnancy [7, 14]. However, hypertension is not uncommon in patients with Takayasu arteritis, and close monitoring of blood pressure is recommended.
Management ofAortic Disease inPregnancy
Management of aortic disease in pregnancy is based primar­ily on case series and expert opinion. Management decisions depend on the stage of the pregnancy, the condition of the mother and child, as well as the disease process involved. Treatment should involve a team approach, including maternal- fetal medicine specialist, cardiologists, and cardio­vascular and vascular surgeons [7].
Aortic dissection in pregnancy presents a potentially life­threatening situation to both mother and child. For women with known genetic syndromes that cause thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection, screening can be done both before and during pregnancy to mitigate risk. Screening and precon­ception strategies for particular genetic syndromes will be described later. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend that all pregnant women with known thoracic aortic dilatation or a familial or genetic predisposition for aortic dissection should undergo strict blood pressure control [15] (Table33.2). Additionally, all pregnant women with known aortic root or ascending aor­tic dilatation should undergo monthly or bimonthly echocar­diographic measurements of the ascending aortic dimensions until delivery. Pregnant women with aortic aneurysms should be delivered at a center where cardiothoracic surgery is avail­able [15]. Women with an aortic diameter>= 45mm at the time of delivery should undergo elective cesarean section [7].
For women presenting with type A aortic dissections, sur­gical treatment should be undertaken immediately, regard­less of the trimester. For women presenting with type B
Table 33.2 Antihypertensive medication use in pregnancy
US FDA
Medication Mechanism of action Methyldopa Central alpha
adrenergic agonist
Labetalol Peripherally acting
Nifedipine Calcium channel
Hydralazine Arteriolar smooth
Clonidine Selective central
Data from: [ FDA Pregnancy Categories: A = Adequate, well-controlled studies have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus in the rst trimester of pregnancy, and there is no evidence of risk in later trimesters. B= Animal reproduction studies have failed to demonstrate a risk to the fetus, and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. C = Animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus, and there are no adequate and well-con­trolled studies in humans, but potential benets may warrant use of the drug in pregnant women despite potential risk. D=There is positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data from investigational or marketing experience or studies in humans, but potential benets may warrant use of the drug in pregnant women despite potential risks. X=Studies in animals or humans have demon­strated fetal abnormalities and/or there is positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data from investigational or mar­keting experience, and the risks involved in the use of the drug in preg­nant women clearly outweigh potential benets [19]
nonselective beta-blocker
blocker
muscle relaxation
alpha
2
agonist
17, 18]
-
2
-adrenergic
Priority of therapy
First line B
Second line
Second line Second line Third line C
pregnancy category [
C
C
C
19]
aortic dissection, medical management is recommended, unless the dissection is complicated by malperfusion [7]. Surgical intervention for pregnant women with aortic dissec­tion requires careful discussions between the surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia teams. European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend surgical repair of an aor­tic dissection while the fetus is in utero for type A dissections that occur before the fetus is viable. After the fetus is consid­ered viable, prompt cesarean delivery is recommended prior to surgical repair of the aortic dissection so as to prevent cesarean delivery while on aortopulmonary bypass [16].
For women with Takayasu arteritis in pregnancy, steroids are the recommended treatment, despite their potential role in increasing the risk of aortic dissection [14].
Pregnancy andAortic Disease inSpecic Conditions
As described above, women with underlying aortopathies have an increased risk of aortic dissection and rupture during their pregnancy. There are recommendations available for the management of aortic disease in several of these conditions.