Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3711_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
274
https://t.me/med1917
C. M. Wittgen et al.
80. Wilson WR, Bower TC, Creager MA, Amin-Hanjani S, O'Gara
PT, Lockhart PB, etal. Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientic statement from the
American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134(20):e412–e60.
81. Seeger JM.Management of patients with prosthetic vascular graft
infection. Am Surg. 2000;66(2):166–77.
82. Vogel TR, Symons R, Flum DR.The incidence and factors associated with graft infection after aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg.
2008;47(2):264–9.
83. Bandyk DF, Berni GA, Thiele BL, Towne JB. Aortofemoral
graft infection due to Staphylococcus epidermidis. Arch Surg.
1984;119(1):102–8.
84. Swain TW 3rd, Calligaro KD, Dougherty MD. Management
of infected aortic prosthetic grafts. Vasc Endovasc Surg.
2004;38(1):75–82.
85. Kieffer E, Bahnini A, Koskas F, Ruotolo C, Le Blevec D,
Plissonnier D.In situ allograft replacement of infected infrarenal
aortic prosthetic grafts: results in forty-three patients. J Vasc Surg.
1993;17(2):349–55. discussion 55-6.
86. Hayes PD, Nasim A, London NJ, Sayers RD, Barrie WW, Bell PR,
etal. In situ replacement of infected aortic grafts with rifampicinbonded prostheses: the Leicester experience (1992 to 1998). J
Vasc Surg. 1999;30(1):92–8.
87. O’Connor S, Andrew P, Batt M, Becquemin JP. A systematic
review and meta-analysis of treatments for aortic graft infection. J
Vasc Surg. 2006;44(1):38–45.
88. Bandyk DF.Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures. Semin Vasc Surg. 2008;21(3):119–23.
89. Treska V, Certik B, Molacek J.Management of aortic graft infections - the present strategy and future perspectives. Bratisl Lek
Listy. 2016;117(3):125–32.
90. Szilagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliott JP, Vrandecic MP. Infection
in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts. Ann Surg.
1972;176(3):321–33.
91. Herscu G, Wilson SE. Prosthetic infection: lessons from treatment of the infected vascular graft. Surg Clin North Am.
2009;89(2):391–401. viii.
92. Goldstone J, Moore WS. Infection in vascular prostheses.
Clinical manifestations and surgical management. Am J Surg.
1974;128(2):225–33.
93. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori
TG, etal. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative
procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections
Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991;91(3B):152S–7S.
94. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis
WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999.
Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect
Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(4):250–78. quiz 79-80.
95. Schurink GW, Peppelenbosch N, Mees B, Jacobs MJ.Diagnostic
algorithms and treatment strategies in primary aortic and aortic
graft infections. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;57(2):224–32.
96. Daenens K, Fourneau I, Nevelsteen A. Ten-year experience in
autogenous reconstruction with the femoral vein in the treatment
of aortofemoral prosthetic infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.
2003;25(3):240–5.
97. Chambers ST.Diagnosis and management of staphylococcal infections of vascular grafts and stents. Intern Med J. 2005;35(Suppl
2):S72–8.
98. Hodgkiss-Harlow KD, Bandyk DF. Antibiotic therapy of aortic graft infection: treatment and prevention recommendations.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2011;24(4):191–8.
99. Garot M, Delannoy PY, Meybeck A, Sarraz-Bournet B, d'Elia P,
d'Escrivan T, etal. Intra-abdominal aortic graft infection: prognostic factors associated with in-hospital mortality. BMC Infect Dis.
2014;14:215.
100. Qvarfordt PG, Reilly LM, Mark AS, Goldstone J, Wall SD,
Ehrenfeld WK, et al. Computerized tomographic assessment
of graft incorporation after aortic reconstruction. Am J Surg.
1985;150(2):227–31.
101. Valentine RJ.Diagnosis and management of aortic graft infection.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2001;14(4):292–301.
102. Spartera C, Morettini G, Petrassi C, Marino G, Minuti U, Pavone
P, etal. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of
aortic graft healing, perigraft uid collection, and graft infection.
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1990;4(1):69–73.
103. Shahidi S, Eskil A, Lundof E, Klaerke A, Jensen BS.Detection
of abdominal aortic graft infection: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and indium-labeled white blood cell scanning. Ann
Vasc Surg. 2007;21(5):586–92.
104. Spacek M, Belohlavek O, Votrubova J, Sebesta P, Stadler
P.Diagnostics of “non-acute” vascular prosthesis infection using
18F-FDG PET/CT: our experience with 96 prostheses. Eur J Nucl
Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(5):850–8.
105. Lawrence PF, Dries DJ, Alazraki N, Albo D Jr. Indium 111-labeled
leukocyte scanning for detection of prosthetic vascular graft infection. J Vasc Surg. 1985;2(1):165–73.
106. Lyons OT, Baguneid M, Barwick TD, Bell RE, Foster N, HomerVanniasinkam S, etal. Diagnosis of aortic graft infection: a case definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration
(MAGIC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52(6):758–63.
107. Ducasse E, Calisti A, Speziale F, Rizzo L, Misuraca M, Fiorani
P.Aortoiliac stent graft infection: current problems and management. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18(5):521–6.
108. Laser A, Baker N, Rectenwald J, Eliason JL, Criado-Pallares E,
Upchurch GR Jr. Graft infection after endovascular abdominal
aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(1):58–63.
109. Sharif MA, Lee B, Lau LL, Ellis PK, Collins AJ, Blair PH, etal.
Prosthetic stent graft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(3):442–8.
110. Ohta T, Hosaka M, Ishibashi H, Sugimoto I, Takeuchi N,
Kazui H, etal. Treatment for aortic graft infection. Surg Today.
2001;31(1):18–26.
111. Hobbs SD, Kumar S, Gilling-Smith GL.Epidemiology and diagnosis of endograft infection. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;51(1):5–14.
112. Setacci C, De Donato G, Setacci F, Chisci E, Perulli A, Galzerano
G, et al. Management of abdominal endograft infection. J
Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;51(1):33–41.
113. May J.Complications of endovascular aortic repair. J Cardiovasc
Surg. 2010;51(1):1–3.
114. Samson RH, Veith FJ, Janko GS, Gupta SK, Scher LA.A modied classication and approach to the management of infections involving peripheral arterial prosthetic grafts. J Vasc Surg.
1988;8(2):147–53.
115. Reilly L. Aortic graft infection: evolution in management.
Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;10(4):372–7.
116. Brown KE, Heyer K, Rodriguez H, Eskandari MK, Pearce WH,
Morasch MD.Arterial reconstruction with cryopreserved human
allografts in the setting of infection: a single-center experience
with midterm follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(3):660–6.
117. Saleem BR, Meerwaldt R, Tielliu IF, Verhoeven EL, van den
Dungen JJ, Zeebregts CJ.Conservative treatment of vascular prosthetic graft infection is associated with high mortality. Am J Surg.
2010;200(1):47–52.
118. Armstrong PA, Back MR, Bandyk DF, Johnson BL, Shames
ML.Selective application of sartorius muscle aps and aggressive
staged surgical debridement can inuence long-term outcomes of
complex prosthetic graft infections. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(1):71–8.
119. Siracuse JJ, Nandivada P, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC,
Chaikof EL, etal. Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral
artery. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(3):700–5.

17 Aortic Infection: Pathophysiology, Bacteriology, andManagement
https://t.me/med1917
275
120. Lyons OT, Patel AS, Saha P, Clough RE, Price N, Taylor PR.A
14-year experience with aortic endograft infection: management
and results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(3):306–13.
121. Smeds MR, Duncan AA, Harlander-Locke MP, Lawrence PF,
Lyden S, Fatima J, etal. Treatment and outcomes of aortic endograft infection. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(2):332–40.
122. Lawrence PF. Conservative treatment of aortic graft infection.
Semin Vasc Surg. 2011;24(4):199–204.
123. Belair M, Soulez G, Oliva VL, Laperriere J, Gianfelice D, Blair
JF, etal. Aortic graft infection: the value of percutaneous drainage.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(1):119–24.
124. Morris GE, Friend PJ, Vassallo DJ, Farrington M, Leapman S,
Quick CR. Antibiotic irrigation and conservative surgery for
major aortic graft infection. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20(1):88–95.
125. Samoukovic G, Bernier PL, Lachapelle K.Successful treatment of
infected ascending aortic prosthesis by omental wrapping without
graft removal. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(1):287–9.
126. Antoniou GA, Koutsias S, Antoniou SA, Georgiakakis A,
Lazarides MK, Giannoukas AD. Outcome after endovascular
stent graft repair of aortoenteric stula: a systematic review. J Vasc
Surg. 2009;49(3):782–9.
127. Xiromeritis K, Dalainas I, Stamatakos M, Filis K.Aortoenteric
stulae: present-day management. Int Surg. 2011;96(3):266–73.
128. Alonso M, Caeiro S, Cachaldora J, Segura R.Infected abdominal
aortic aneurysm: in situ replacement with cryopreserved arterial
homograft. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1997;38(4):371–5.
129. Bandyk DF, Novotney ML, Back MR, Johnson BL, Schmacht
DC. Expanded application of in situ replacement for prosthetic
graft infection. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(3):411–9. discussion 9-20.
130. Vardanian AJ, Chau A, Quinones-Baldrich W, Lawrence
PE. Arterial allograft allows in-line reconstruction of prosthetic
graft infection with low recurrence rate and mortality. Am Surg.
2009;75(10):1000–3.
131. Lehnert T, Gruber HP, Maeder N, Allenberg JR.Management of
primary aortic graft infection by extra-anatomic bypass reconstruction. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7(3):301–7.
132. Ali AT, Modrall JG, Hocking J, Valentine RJ, Spencer H, Eidt JF,
etal. Long-term results of the treatment of aortic graft infection by
in situ replacement with femoral popliteal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg.
2009;50(1):30–9.
133. Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Hagino RT. Autogenous aortoiliac/
femoral reconstruction from supercial femoral-popliteal veins:
feasibility and durability. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25(2):255–66. discussion 67-70.
134. Yeager RA, Moneta GL, Taylor LM Jr, Harris EJ Jr, McConnell
DB, Porter JM.Improving survival and limb salvage in patients
with aortic graft infection. Am J Surg. 1990;159(5):466–9.
135. Yeager RA, Taylor LM Jr, Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Nicoloff AD,
McConnell DB, et al. Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30(1):
76–83.
136. Bunt TJ.Synthetic vascular graft infections. I.Graft infections.
Surgery. 1983;93(6):733–46.
137. Yashar JJ, Weyman AK, Burnard RJ, Yashar J.Survival and limb
salvage in patients with infected arterial prostheses. Am J Surg.
1978;135(4):499–504.
138. Ricotta JJ, Faggioli GL, Stella A, Curl GR, Peer R, Upson J, etal.
Total excision and extra-anatomic bypass for aortic graft infection. Am J Surg. 1991;162(2):145–9.
139. Sharp WJ, Hoballah JJ, Mohan CR, Kresowik TF, Martinasevic
M, Chalmers RT, et al. The management of the infected aortic prosthesis: a current decade of experience. J Vasc Surg.
1994;19(5):844–50.
140. Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr, Sa H, Goldstone J, Morasch
MD, et al. Abdominal aortic reconstruction in infected elds:
early results of the United States cryopreserved aortic allograft
registry. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(5):847–52.
141. Oderich GS, Bower TC, Cherry KJ Jr, Panneton JM, Sullivan TM,
Noel AA, etal. Evolution from axillofemoral to in situ prosthetic
reconstruction for the treatment of aortic graft infections at a single center. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(6):1166–74.
142. Zhou W, Lin PH, Bush RL, Terramani TT, Matsuura JH, Cox M,
etal. In situ reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allografts
for management of mycotic aneurysms or aortic prosthetic graft
infections: a multi-institutional experience. Tex Heart Inst J.
2006;33(1):14–8.
143. Koskas F, Goeau-Brissonniere O, Nicolas MH, Bacourt F,
Kieffer E. Arteries from human beings are less infectible by
Staphylococcus aureus than polytetrauoroethylene in an aortic
dog model. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(3):472–6.
144. Berger P, Van Herwaarden JA, Harkisoen S, De Vries JP,
Ekkelenkamp M, Moll FL.Surgical treatment of infected aortic
grafts. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;53(6):719–34.

Surgical Treatment
https://t.me/med1917
oftheThoracic Aorta
JuanJoseGallegos Jr., GeorgeArnaoutakis,
DeanJ.Arnaoutakis, KirstenA.Freeman,
DavidJereyHall, andMahmoudAlhussaini
18
Perfusion Techniques forProximal
Aortic Aneurysms
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (Fig. 18.1) is utilized for
providing circulatory support in ascending aortic aneurysms
(aortic annulus to innominate artery). If the involvement is
restricted to the aortic root or ascending aorta alone, then
CPB is sufcient. When aneurysmal disease involves the
arch, or arch repair is anticipated, circulatory arrest is generally required. There are multiple approaches to circulatory
arrest including deep hypothermia without cerebral perfusion
and varying degrees of hypothermia with cerebral perfusion.
The best strategy for cerebral protection is currently under
debate and is a focus of active investigation. Options include
deep hypothermia (18–22 °C), moderate hypothermia (22–
26°C), and mild hypothermia (26–30 °C). Cannulation for
arch disease depends on the cerebral perfusion strategy.
Direct aortic cannulation with dual-stage right atrial cannula
can be used in selective antegrade cerebral circulation via
direct arch vessel ostia once circulatory arrest is initiated
(Fig.18.2). Multiple techniques are available in clinical practice for cerebral perfusion: (1) retrograde cerebral perfusion,
(2) selective unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion via right
axillary perfusion, and (3) direct bilateral antegrade cerebral
perfusion via ostia of the arch vessels (Fig.18.2). When comparing antegrade versus retrograde cerebral perfusions during
deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, there is no difference in
30-day mortality or stroke in the postoperative period [1].
When comparing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest to
moderate hypothermic arrest, there are shorter cross clamp
times, shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times, and fewer
transfusion requirements during moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest [2]. Some studies have shown moderate hypothermic arrest is also associated with fewer neurologic
sequelae compared to deep hypothermic arrest and lower
30-day mortality; however, no randomized data exist [3].
Surgical Technique
The patient is positioned supine and a roll is placed between the
scapulae to allow greater exposure to the sternum and mediastinum. The neck should be extended which is particularly helpful for patients with large body habitus. The arms are tucked to
the side. Body hair is clipped, and the patient is prepped from
the angle of the mandible to feet. Care is taken to stay midline
while performing the sternotomy. The sternal periosteal vessels
are coagulated, and vancomycin paste is applied to the sternal
edges. Although the utility of vancomycin applied to sternal
edges is highly debated, several studies have found signicant
reduction in supercial and deep wound infections [4–7]. A
sternal retractor is used to expose the anterior mediastinum.
The thymus is separated midline up to the innominate vein. The
pericardium is opened from the diaphragmatic pericardium up
to the superior pericardial reection and transversely at the
superior and inferior portion of the pericardium. If the arch is
uninvolved, there is minimal dissection needed onto the arch of
the aorta. Circumferential dissection of the aorta is carried out
in preparation for replacement with graft.
J. J. Gallegos Jr. (*) · K. A. Freeman · D. J. Hall · M. Alhussaini
G. Arnaoutakis
Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular
Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
D. J. Arnaoutakis
Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular
Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
R. S. Dieter et al. (eds.), Diseases of the Aorta, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_18
Repair ofAortic Root andAscending
Aortic Aneurysms
Root repair can be performed in many fashions, with composite replacements being more common compared to valvesparing procedure. Composite mechanical prosthesis is
generally chosen for younger patients with few comorbidities.
277

278
Cardiopulmonary bypass Left heart bypass
Ar
exchanger
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Gallegos Jr. et al.
SVC
IVC
terial
outflow
RA
RV
LA
Aorta
Pump
sucker
SVC
LV vent
LV
Reservior
Pump
RA
RV
IVC
Aorta
LA
LV
Oxygenator Heart
Fig. 18.1 Partial cardiopulmonary bypass versus left heart bypass for open TAAA repair
Biologic composites are often reserved for those in advanced
age who could not tolerate anticoagulation. Bioprosthetic
valves additionally offer patients many benets such as freedom from anticoagulation and potential for transcatheter
replacement if structural degeneration occurs.
All patients undergo intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate for aortic valve insufciency
or other aortic pathology which may alter the therapeutic
approach. For ascending aorta replacement alone, cannulation
of the aorta should be distal enough to allow cross clamp and
anastomosis to healthy aorta. If the diseased segment extends
to the level of the innominate artery, this may require circulatory arrest to achieve adequate aortic replacement. If circulatory arrest is contemplated because the aneurysm approaches
zone 1 of the aorta, then the cannulation site need not be distal
on the aortic arch. The atrium is then cannulated with a dualstage cannula. A ventricular vent catheter is strongly recommended in all aortic root procedures, as manipulation of the
aorta may cause aortic insufciency. When the integrity of the
proximal arch is in question, hypothermic circulatory arrest is
used to allow for complete inspection of the arch.
Prior to cannulation, the patient is given heparin
(400units/kg), and cardiopulmonary bypass is instituted at
an activation clotting time (ACT) of greater than 480s. The
patient is cooled to 22–28°C.While cooling, any further dissection is completed prior to cross clamping. The cross
clamp is applied, and cardioplegia is administered. A transverse aortotomy is performed at the sinotubular junction.
The distal segment of aorta the ascending aorta is then
removed. For aortic root replacement, the right and left coronary buttons are fashioned by sharp excision leaving enough
aorta around the ostia to allow for a safe anastomosis to the
graft/tissue. The aortic root is completely mobilized using a
combination of sharp and cautery dissection.
The aortic root anastomosis is completed with composite
conduit with 2–0 polyester suture pledgeted horizontal
mattress sutures. The suture line is dried and Bioglue may be
applied to the suture line particularly in friable tissues. The
right and left coronary buttons are sized and location on the
conduit chosen for the anastomoses. It is imperative to have
sufcient mobility on both coronary buttons to ensure a
tension- free anastomosis. The ostial sites are then opened with
a high-temperature cautery pen. If a biologic conduit is being
used such as homograft or xenograft root, a 4mm punch is
used to create the ostial sites. The left coronary button is rst
anastomosed followed by the right coronary button.
Pump

18 Surgical Treatment oftheThoracic Aorta
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 18.2 Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion vial ostia of arch
vessels
The distal anastomosis is performed proximal to the aortic clamp with a 4-0 polypropylene suture in a running fashion. If the aorta is thin or of poor quality, then a felt strip is
used to bolster the anastomosis. Bioglue can be applied to
the distal anastomosis, and the aorta is deaired prior to
removing the cross clamp (Fig.18.3).
Ascending Aortic Aneurysms
Supravalvular aortic aneurysms are treated with tube graft
replacement of the ascending aorta. Aortic arch or innominate
artery cannulation is performed, which allows for innocuous
manipulation of the proximal aorta during anastomosis.
Venous cannulation is performed with a dual-stage cannula.
Prior to initiating cardiopulmonary bypass, the ascending
aorta is evaluated for the cross-clamp site. For isolated tube
graft replacement of the ascending aorta, mild hypothermia is
used unless prolonged bypass is anticipated, as in cases where
concomitant cardiac procedures are performed.
Once cardiopulmonary bypass is initiated, the ascending
aorta is resected distal to the sinotubular junction to distal
disease-free margin of the distal ascending aorta. 4-0 polypropylene suture is used to create a running anastomosis.
279
Bioglue can be administered to the aortic anastomosis
(Fig.18.4). If the proximal aortic arch is involved, moderate
hypothermia is utilized, and a brief period of circulatory
arrest is used with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.
Aortic Arch Disease
Aortic arch disease involves a unique set of challenges. When
considering treatment options for patients with arch disease, one
must take into consideration the extent of the disease and assess
the need for descending aorta repair. These issues will direct the
optimal cannulation strategy. Preferentially, right axillary antegrade ow which allows selective unilateral antegrade cerebral
perfusion or direct aortic cannulation with ostial cerebral perfusion while on circulatory arrest is chosen over retrograde cerebral perfusion or no cerebral perfusion. In the context of a
patient with cerebral vascular disease or circle of Willis that is
not in continuity or diseased, direct cannulation and perfusion of
the arch vessels is a better alternative once on circulatory arrest.
Venous cannulation is performed with dual-stage cannula.
Options for arch replacement are tube graft to the distal aortic
arch with an end-to-side anastomosis of the arch island as a
patch. A triple-branch arch graft with a side arm to re- establish
perfusion through the graft once the distal and arch vessel anastomosis are complete is the preferred graft choice because it
avoids the risk of subsequent patch aneurysm formation.
Once cardiopulmonary bypass is initiated, the patient is
cooled to 22°C.The extent of the aortic aneurysmal disease
is inspected. Antegrade cardioplegia is administered, and then
diseased aorta is resected. The innominate artery is clamped
proximal to the right axillary artery and carotid bifurcation.
Selective antegrade ow is set at 10cc/kg/min of ow, and
distal perfusion is ceased. To ensure antegrade perfusion is
functioning, we visualize ow through the left common
carotid and left subclavian arteries. Bilateral cerebral oximetry and electroencephalography are important monitoring
adjuncts to ensure adequate cerebral protection. If there are
concerns during unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion,
direct ostial cannulation of the left carotid is implemented for
cerebral protection. Another alternative is retrograde cerebral
perfusion, but this modality is preferred for shorter circulatory arrest times such as hemiarch replacement only.
The anastomoses are started distal to proximal. The rst
anastomosis is to the descending aorta. This is completed in
a similar fashion as the distal ascending arch repair, generally using a 3–0 polypropylene and felt strip, with Bioglue
around the anastomosis. The subclavian artery anastomosis
is typically performed under circulatory arrest to assist with
visualization, using a 4–0 polypropylene suture (Fig.18.5).
The side branch of the graft can be recannulated and cardiopulmonary bypass re-established to achieve distal organ perfusion. The left carotid and innominate artery anastomoses
are then sequentially performed, taking care to de-air each of

280
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 18.3 (a–d). The
complete Bentall procedure
J. J. Gallegos Jr. et al.
a
b
c
these anastomoses prior to re-establishing antegrade ow.
The proximal anastomosis is performed in the same manner
as above. De-airing maneuvers are performed, and the clamp
is released while the patient is rewarmed.
d
tion [10]. The risk of mortality increases with renal injury up to
10% depending on the degree of renal dysfunction [9]. Hospital
volume contributes to surgical outcomes in proximal aortic disease as well. Centers with high volume have a mortality rate of
1–3.4% compared to 5.8% in low- volume centers [9, 11].
Outcomes andComplications
Mortality
Survival from proximal aorta and arch aneurysms is variable.
Elective replacement of the proximal aorta carries a mortality
rate of 1–3.4%, whereas it is up to 15.4% for nonelective cases
[8, 9]. There are many factors that contribute to mortality
including urgency of the case, age, ventricular function, arch
surgery, concomitant coronary surgery, pulmonary disease,
nonsinus rhythm, female sex, NYHA >II, and renal dysfunc-
Complications
Elective proximal aortic surgery can be accomplished relatively safely with good outcomes. However, the commonly
encountered complications include cerebrovascular accident, temporary neurologic dysfunction, hemorrhage, and
pulmonary and renal dysfunction. The occurrence of a complication contributes not only to length of stay but mortality.
Coagulopathy is caused by many interacting factors: hypothermia, inammation, and anticoagulation. Preoperative

Graft
ta
ab c
18 Surgical Treatment oftheThoracic Aorta
https://t.me/med1917
281
disseminated intravascular coagulation has been described in
aortic aneurysms [12]. Ultimately, abnormalities in the clotting cascade lead to increased transfusions. Cardiopulmonary
bypass induces a proinammatory state. Its utilization, particularly with prolonged bypass times, can lead to end-organ
damage along with coagulopathy. Visceral injury from cardiopulmonary bypass can be caused by hypoperfusion [13].
Aor
It is difcult to quantify these conditions as surgical approach,
length of surgery, length of cardiopulmonary bypass, length
of circulatory arrest, and volume of surgical interventions
vary from surgeon to surgeon.
Stroke is a complication of aortic surgery and varies
depending on urgency of the intervention. The majority of
strokes are embolic [14]. The length of cerebral ischemia is
correlated to increased rates of stroke. There have been
decreased rates of stroke with the combination of hypothermia, cannulation strategies, and antegrade cerebral perfusion.
Long-Term Survival
As surgical techniques continue to evolve, long-term survival
has improved. Long-term mortality decreased from 16.7% to
11.6% from 1992 to 2004 at 60days and varies between 32%
and 57% at 10years when evaluating dissections and aneurysms [15–17]. Most commonly, mortality is associated with
cardiac or aortic correlating to the age of the patient [15, 18].
Age greater than 60 is independently associated with longterm mortality [18]. Five percent of patients at 5years will
have reoperations and at 10years nearly 8% [18].
Fig. 18.4 Completed ascending aortic aneurysm repair
Fig. 18.5 (a–c) Completion
of aortic arch repair
SCP
Surgical Treatment ofDescending Thoracic
andThoracoabdominal Aneurysms
Introduction
While open repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms
(TAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs)
remains the gold standard for the treatment of these complex
disease processes, it involves some of the most challenging
preoperative planning, intraoperative decision making, and
postoperative care that surgeons encounter. Successful

282
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Gallegos Jr. et al.
outcomes not only require appropriate patient selection and
meticulous execution of chosen repair but have also evolved
to include adjuncts for end-organ and spinal cord protection
and protocol-driven postoperative care to limit morbidity
related to spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and renal failure.
Intraoperative Considerations
Anesthesia
The usual setup for DTAA or TAAA repairs includes a
double- lumen endotracheal tube, central lines, a pulmonary
artery catheter (for hemodynamic monitoring), a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) probe (to optimize cardiac
function and to guide cannula placement if using CPB), and
arterial lines (in both the upper and lower extremities to
monitor both proximal and distal perfusion during aortic
clamping). Lumbar cerebrospinal uid (CSF) drains are used
routinely for Crawford extent I and II repairs [19]. The target
CSF pressure is typically 7–10mm Hg with drainage over
the chosen pressure. Cranial and peripheral electrodes are
placed for monitoring of somatosensory or motor evoked
potentials to assess intraoperative spinal cord protection and
perfusion [20]. Mannitol and sodium bicarbonate infusion
are commonly administered to protect the kidneys while the
aorta is occluded [21]. Blood counts are checked frequently
throughout the operation and cell saver, packed red blood
cells, and fresh frozen plasma are transfused as necessary. If
vasodilators are needed, nitroprusside and hydralazine
should be avoided due to their potential detrimental effects
on ischemic tolerance of the spinal cord [22].
Perfusion Techniques
Regarding circulatory support for TAAA repair, most groups
advocate either left heart bypass (LHB) or partial cardiopulmonary bypass (Fig.18.1) [19, 23]. With LHB, oxygenated
blood from the heart is delivered to a centrifugal pump via a
cannula inserted into the left atrium or the left inferior pulmonary vein. The pump then delivers the blood to the distal
aorta including its visceral and pelvic branches through a
cannula that is inserted directly into the femoral or iliac
artery, or into an 8mm Dacron conduit that has been sewn to
the left common femoral artery. This technique is benecial
as it reduces cardiac strain despite the proximal aortic clamping and decreases the incidence of ischemia-associated complications such as metabolic acidosis, acute renal failure, and
paraplegia. Also, it avoids the inammatory insult associated
with the use of a membrane oxygenator [24].
Alternatively, some groups prefer partial cardiopulmonary bypass achieved through femoral arterial cannulation
(either direct cannulation or through an 8mm Dacron graft)
and bicaval venous cannula inserted through the left femoral
vein and positioned in the center of the right atrium under
TEE guidance to allow for blood return to the oxygenator.
By monitoring radial and femoral arterial lines, the blood
pressure proximal and distal to the aortic cross-clamps can
be manipulated by adjusting the pump ow and venous
drainage. This technique reduces strain on the right side of
the heart despite the proximal aortic clamping and is benecial in patients with poor pulmonary function who may not
tolerate single lung ventilation [
25, 26]. In cases where a
proximal clamp site is not feasible, circulatory arrest is mandatory for construction of the proximal anastomosis [27].
The same cannulation strategy can be used but in conjunction with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and
subsequent total body retrograde perfusion, enabling a uniform strategy for all TAAA repairs [28].
Spinal Cord Protection
Numerous strategies have been implemented to reduce the
risk of spinal cord ischemia associated with TAA and TAAA
repair.
Spinal Cord Protection Strategy During Descending and
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Anatomical
• Motor evoked potential monitoring to identify critical segmental arteries to reattach
• Sequential aortic clamping when possible
Physiological
• Moderate heparinization (1mg/kg)
• Permissive mild hypothermia (32–34 °C,
nasopharyngeal)
• Cerebrospinal uid drainage
• Left heart bypass during proximal anastomosis
Naturally, the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) increases
when fewer radicular arteries are patent after TAAA, which
varies by the underlying aortic pathology as well as the
extent of aortic replacement. This concept led surgeons to
selectively or nonselectively reimplant intercostal arteries
[29, 30], but this strategy seems to have limited benet in
those with aneurysmal disease and an almost negligible role
in those with acute dissection [31, 32]. Jacobs and colleagues
elegantly demonstrated that intraoperative neurologic monitoring with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) can be used to
help identify critical intercostal arteries for revascularization
and augment hemodynamics in order to reverse SCI [20]. A
sudden drop in MEP amplitude following sequential clamping prompts an increase in distal perfusion pressures; if
MEPs do not rebound, then intercostal vessels in the involved

18 Surgical Treatment oftheThoracic Aorta
https://t.me/med1917
283
segment are reimplanted with an inclusion button. Patients
with extensive Type II TAAAs derive the most benet from
the use of MEPs with targeted intercostal reimplantation as
opposed to those with less extensive TAAAs [32].
Additionally, there are several physiologic maneuvers
that have been shown to diminish the risk of SCI.These
include hypothermia, decreasing spinal pressure via CSF
drainage, increasing mean arterial pressure (MAP), maintaining oxygen delivery to tissues by avoiding anemia and
hypoxia, and neurochemical protection with naloxone, steroids, and burst suppression [33, 34]. In fact, sophisticated
work by Acher and colleagues has shown that these physiologic parameters account for 80% of paraplegia risk,
whereas intercostal blood ow is responsible for 20% of
risk [32].
Moderate hypothermia (32°C) has been shown in animal
models to confer SCI protection for up to 50min [35]. Some
studies suggest that DHCA (15–20°C) may offer even greater
spinal cord protection with TAAA repair [36]. The systemic
temperature goal is typically achieved actively with the use
of a heat exchanger within a CPB circuit. Using CPB allows
for active rewarming of the patient but with risk of coagulopathic bleeding, pulmonary dysfunction, and cardiac arrhythmias, all of which are more profound if deep hypothermia is
utilized [27]. In contrast to active cooling, passive systemic
cooling can be accomplished through the administration of
cold intravenous uids and avoidance of external warming
mechanisms. An alternative option is regional hypothermia
whereby an epidural infusion system is used to instill iced
saline into the watershed zone of the spinal cord, taking care
to avoid increasing CSF pressure [37].
CSF drainage effectively acts to increase spinal perfusion
pressure by decreasing CSF pressure to 8mm Hg intraoperatively and 10mm Hg postoperatively. Two randomized trials
from the same center have shown conicting results with
CSF drainage [38, 39]. Nonetheless, most agree that CSF
drainage remains central to a spinal cord protection
protocol.
Additional physiologic adjuncts can include the administration of steroids methylprednisolone (30mg/kg) and mannitol (12.5 g) during anesthesia induction to reduce
ischemia-reperfusion injury. Mannitol not only decreases
CSF pressure and preserves urine ow after renal ischemia
but also acts as a free radical scavenger [21]. Acher and colleagues also utilize a naloxone infusion (1 mcg/kg/hr)
because it has been shown to decrease excitatory neurotransmitters from ischemic neurons [40]. Finally, MAP is typically maintained above 100 mm Hg while the aorta is
clamped, and hemoglobin concentrations should be kept
≥10g/dL to help preserve spinal cord oxygen delivery. The
importance of maintaining goal arterial pressure cannot be
overemphasized, as most causes of delayed SCI likely arise
from brief periods of postoperative hypotension [41].
Visceral Organ Protection
Some of the methods used for spinal cord protection additionally aid in preventing ischemic injury of the abdominal
viscera. These include permissive hypothermia and sequential aortic clamping in the repair of any TAAA.Additionally,
cold crystalloid selective renal perfusion and selective perfusion of the celiac and superior mesenteric axes are frequently
employed in extent I and II TAAA repairs [42]. This is
accomplished utilizing balloon-tipped catheters and a separate arterial inow circuit from the bypass pump to perfuse
the celiac and superior mesenteric vascular beds with oxygenated blood, particularly during the reattachment of proximal thoracic aortic segmental arteries.
Surgical Approach
Surgical Positioning andExposure
The patient is placed in a modied right lateral decubitus
position with padding of all pressure points and a right axillary roll to protect the axillary nerve (Fig.18.6). The hips are
rotated obliquely to the left to allow access to the right groin,
if necessary. The right knee is exed, and the left kept
straight, with padding between the legs to avoid stretch on
the left femoral nerve. A beanbag is used to maintain this
position and the table is exed just above the iliac crest. The
eld is prepped to include the left chest including the axilla
superiorly and the spine posteriorly. The entire abdomen and
both groins are prepped.
An incision along the fth or sixth intercostal space is
adequate for most Type I and Type II TAAAs. Type III
TAAAs are approached through the seventh or eighth intercostal space and Type IV TAAAs through the ninth interspace. The incision is extended down along the abdominal
wall onto the left lower quadrant, staying lateral to the left
rectus muscle. The costal margin is divided connecting the
retroperitoneum to the chest cavity. The retroperitoneal plane
is developed deep to the transversus abdominus muscle taking care to not violate the peritoneum, which can be quite
thin medially. Care should be taken upon entering the abdomen to clearly identify the external and internal oblique layers, as their identication aids in closure later in the case.
After the costal margin is divided, the diaphragm is incised
circumferentially taking care to avoid injury to the phrenic
nerve but leaving enough diaphragmatic cuff on the chest
wall to facilitate closure. The left kidney and viscera are
reected medially, exposing the aorta from the hiatus to the
iliac bifurcation. At this point, single-lung ventilation can be
used, and a self-retaining retractor system should be placed
to maintain exposure.
The left inferior pulmonary ligament is divided, and the
lung is mobilized from the aneurysm. The extent of proximal
exposure again depends on the location of aortic disease.

284
https://t.me/med1917
J. J. Gallegos Jr. et al.
Shoulders
60˚
Hips
30˚
Fig. 18.6 Patient positioning. For repair of the descending thoracic aorta, the patient is positioned in modied right lateral decubitus position. The
surgical incision extends from the left scapula through the fth to seventh intercostal space across the costal margin and toward the left periumbilical region to allow the surgeon to enter the retroperitoneal space
Care should be taken to identify and avoid injury to the
phrenic, vagus, and recurrent laryngeal nerves, which are
encountered during the dissection of the proximal thoracic
aorta. If repairing a TAAA, the abdominal aortic branches
are now exposed dissecting free the celiac artery (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and left renal artery (LRA).
Sufcient exposure of the SMA and CA to allow clamp
placement will prevent unnecessary blood loss from back
bleeding upon opening the aneurysm sac.
Repair oftheDescending Thoracic Aorta
Segment
After sufcient exposure, the sequence and method of aortic
reconstruction can proceed in a variety of ways depending on
surgeon preference. The basic principles are to facilitate the
completion of the reconstruction, prevent spinal cord injury,
and allow perfusion of the branch vessels/lower extremities
for as long as possible through each step to avoid ischemia/
reperfusion injury of the end organs.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
