Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3711_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать
184
https://t.me/med1917
Z1
V. M. Rodriguez et al.
a
Z2
Z0
Z3
Z4
Fig. 12.11 Ischimura’s classication of zones of the aortic arch. This
classication system is widely used to determine the preferred option of hybrid endovascular aortic arch aneurysm repair. (Courtesy of Lena P.Abraham)
Hybrid procedures thus avoid the need for cardiopulmo­nary bypass or hypothermic circulatory arrest. Modications in existing technology and new-generation devices, such as the Conformable TAG thoracic device (C-TAG, Gore & Associates), Valiant thoracic stent graft (Medtronic), Relay thoracic device (Bolton Medical), and Zenith Alpha thoracic endovascular graft (Cook Medical), have resulted in more reliable trackability and precise deployment at the distal margin of the innominate, left common carotid, and left sub­clavian arteries (LSA), or in the ascending aorta.
The arm’s rich collateral blood supply obviates the need for mandatory revascularization, especially in an emer­gency setting, but restoring direct arterial ow to the sub­clavian artery can be important in stroke prevention as well as in the prevention of paraplegia, depending on the extent of coverage of the thoracic aorta. The decision to revascu­larize the left subclavian with left carotid–subclavian artery bypass has been a subject of much debate in the literature [20]. As mentioned, often the decision is based on the amount of thoracic aortic coverage required or the presence of a dominant or solitary left vertebral artery, or the pres­ence of a functioning left internal mammary artery coro­nary artery bypass graft, all of which necessitate left subclavian revascularization. Clinical trials are currently underway examining the safety and feasibility of the Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE device), as well as the Valiant Mona LSA Thoracic Stent Graft System, both of which feature endovascular revascularization as part of their thoracic stent graft via branches attached to their stent graft platform (Fig.12.12). If surgical left carotid
b
Fig. 12.12 (a) GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis.
(Reprinted with permission from W.L. Gore and Associates). (b) Medtronic Valiant Mona LSA Thoracic Stent Graft System. (Reprinted with permission from Medtronic)
12 Aortic Arch Aneurysms
https://t.me/med1917
185
subclavian bypass is performed, either proximal surgical ligation of the left subclavian artery or endovascular proxi­mal occlusion of this artery is generally required to prevent retrograde endoleak.
Chimney or snorkel grafts (Fig.12.13) have been pro­posed to extend the proximal xation zone in the aortic arch during TEVAR repairs [21]. They have the advantage of using standard, off-the-shelf materials and being tech­nically less demanding, but their durability and ability to effect exclusion of an arch aneurysm in the aortic arch remains questionable, despite reported early success [22,
23]. Thoracic stent graft technology is not being devel-
oped with chimney and snorkel grafts in mind, and conse­quently, there are presently no ideal stent grafts for this application. Until longer and more rigorous follow-up are available, chimney grafts should only be considered in emergency patients who are poor candidates for open repair or in cases of inadvertent coverage of the supra­aortic trunks.
Near-Total Arch Branched Endovascular Grafts
Near-total branched arch stent grafting offers several advan­tages over other approaches including avoiding the need for sternotomy, eliminating exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass, and circulatory arrest, and minimizing the extent of extra-anatomic bypass of supra-aortic vessels [24]. Several iterations of graft designs exist with the latest generation
grafts being exible enough to accommodate most arch anat­omy. Branched arch endografts from Cook Medical and Bolton are available outside the United States under special access (Fig.
12.14).
The author (C.A.) has one of the largest experiences (15 cases) using the Cook Medical Arch Branched Graft in North America. Over 200 cases have been performed worldwide, and the global experience has provided valuable insight into improving stroke and mortality rates [25]. Supra-aortic branch target vessels must be of suitable diameter. The innominate artery should have a minimum diameter of 8mm, while the left common carotid artery should have a minimum diameter of 6 mm. A custom-made branch extension limb provided by Cook Medical is usually required for the innom­inate artery in order to accommodate the larger diameter of the distal innominate artery. Commercially available covered stents are suitable for most carotid or subclavian arteries. Because of its accuracy and versatility, our preference is for the Atrium/ICast covered stent graft; although Bard Fluency™ and Gore Viabahn™ covered self-expanding stents are also used worldwide. The balloon expandable cov­ered stents require lining with a bare metal self-expanding stent to add support and mitigate against tortuosity or possi­ble kinking.
Conduct of the procedure has been described elsewhere
24]. Salient points include the need for a stiff wire buried in
[ the left ventricle, deployment during asystole, achieved with either rapid ventricular pacing or right atrial venous balloon occlusion, and attention to the relationship of the endograft
Fig. 12.13 (a) Snorkel Zone 1 Arch thoracic
endovascular repair. (b) Snorkel Zone 0 Arch thoracic endovascular repair. (Courtesy of Lena P.Abraham)
ab
186
https://t.me/med1917
V. M. Rodriguez et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 12.14 (a) Bolton Relay Branch Thoracic Stent-Graft System. (Reprinted with permission from Bolton Medical). (b, c) Cook Arch Branched
Graft ™. (Reprinted with permission from Cook Medical)
and its branches to the coronary arteries and supra-aortic vessels (Fig.12.15).
The largest published series of arch branch endografting was a global experience that included 38 patients with median follow-up of 12months [25]. The 30-day mortality of the entire cohort was 13.2%. Comparative analysis of the early experience (rst 10 patients) and late experience demonstrated an interesting but not statistically signicant difference in 30-day mortality (30% vs. 7.1%, p=0.06). No late mortality was observed during the follow-up period. Cause of death included perioperative cardiac arrest, myo­cardial infarction, hemorrhagic shock, and pulmonary com­plications. Early procedural success was 84.2%. Failures
included proximal type 1 endoleak, failure to catheterize the innominate branch, and conversion to chimney tech­nique. On discharge, 28.8% of patients were diagnosed with an endoleak (5 Type I, 3 Type II, Type III, and 2 inde­terminate), with 10.5% of patients requiring a secondary procedure. Neurological complications occurred in 16% of patients who survived the procedure. This compares to 4–12% neurological event rates seen in larger series of tra­ditional open and hybrid repairs [2628]. All patients in the branched arch endograft series had a full neurologic recov­ery (4 transient ischemic attacks, 1 stroke, 1 subarachnoid hemorrhage). In comparative analysis of the early experi­ence (rst 10 patients) compared to the late experience,
12 Aortic Arch Aneurysms
https://t.me/med1917
Fig. 12.15 Angiogram aortic arch demonstrating relationship of branch
markings (yellow and red arrows), to origins of supra-aortic vessels (open white arrows), and proximal arch branch graft stent to origins of coronary arteries (solid white and black arrows). Note double curved lunderquist wire buried in left ventricle
there were signicantly fewer intraoperative complications, less need for secondary procedures, less need for interven­tions for endoleaks, less operative time, and less radiation exposure. This highlights the importance of the learning curve involved with this complex procedure as well as the importance of conning these procedures to high volume regional centers.
Although a viable alternative to traditional open and hybrid repair, near-total endovascular arch stent grafting is still in its early development. The complexity of arch geom­etry and its branches poses unique challenges for endovascu­lar devices and necessitates an individualized approach. These complex endovascular procedures should be reserved for patients who are not able to tolerate open or hybrid pro­cedures for anatomic reasons, or in patients who have signi­cant comorbidities precluding open surgery. Stroke remains an important risk in these procedures. Despite satisfactory early results, mid- to long-term studies are needed before we can recommend this treatment as a comparable alternative to standard open arch reconstruction or hybrid arch repair.
References
1. Berdajs D, Turina M.Surgical anatomy of the aorta. In: Berdajs D,
Turina M, editors. Operative anatomy of the heart. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011.
187
2. Moon MR, Sundt TM 3rd. Aortic arch aneurysms. Coron Artery Dis. 2002;13(2):85–92. PubMed PMID: 12004260. English.
3. Moon MR, Miller DC.Aortic arch replacement for dissection. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;4:33–57.
4. DeBakey ME, McCollum CH, Crawford ES, Morris GC Jr, Howell J, Noon GP, et al. Dissection and dissecting aneurysms of the aorta: twenty-year follow-up of ve hundred twenty-seven patients treated surgically. Surgery. 1982;92(6):1118–34. PubMed PMID:
7147190. English.
5. Griepp RB, Stinson EB, Hollingsworth JF, Buehler D.Prosthetic replacement of the aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;70(6):1051–63. PubMed PMID: 1186283. English.
6. Borst HG, Walterbusch G, Schaps D. Extensive aortic replace­ment using “elephant trunk” prosthesis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;31(1):37–40. PubMed PMID: 6189250. English.
7. Kamiya H, Hagl C, Kropivnitskaya I, Bothig D, Kallenbach K, Khaladj N, etal. The safety of moderate hypothermic lower body circulatory arrest with selective cerebral perfusion: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(2):501–9. PubMed PMID: 17258589. English.
8. Ueda Y, Miki S, Kusuhara K, Okita Y, Tahata T, Yamanaka K. Surgical treatment of aneurysm or dissection involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch, utilizing circulatory arrest and ret­rograde cerebral perfusion. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;31(5):553–8. PubMed PMID: 2229147. English.
9. Okita Y, Minatoya K, Tagusari O, Ando M, Nagatsuka K, Kitamura S. Prospective comparative study of brain protection in total aortic arch replacement: deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion or selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(1):72–9. PubMed PMID: 11465234. English.
10. Sa HJ, Miller CC 3rd, Lee TY, Estrera AL.Repair of ascending and transverse aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(3):630–
3. PubMed PMID: 21269650. English.
11. Svensson LG, Nadolny EM, Penney DL, Jacobson J, Kimmel WA, Entrup MH, et al. Prospective randomized neurocognitive and S-100 study of hypothermic circulatory arrest, retrograde brain perfusion, and antegrade brain perfusion for aortic arch operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(6):1905–12. PubMed PMID: 11426767. English.
12. Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Sabik JF 3rd, Lytle BW, Gonzalez-Stawinski G, et al. Does the arterial cannulation site for circulatory arrest inuence stroke risk? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(4):1274–84; discussion –84. PubMed PMID: 15464485. English.
13. Svensson LG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, Coselli JS, Raskin S, Shenaq SA, etal. Deep hypothermia with circulatory arrest. Determinants of stroke and early mortality in 656 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106(1):19–28; discussion –31. PubMed PMID:
8321002. English.
14. Sabik JF, Nemeh H, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Gillinov AM, Rajeswaran J, etal. Cannulation of the axillary artery with a side graft reduces morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(4):1315–20. PubMed PMID: 15063259. English.
15. Okita Y, Okada K, Omura A, Kano H, Minami H, Inoue T, etal. Total arch replacement using antegrade cerebral perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(3 Suppl):S63–71. PubMed PMID:
23266252. English.
16. Khullar V, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Greason KL, Joyce LD, etal. Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for treat­ing aortic arch pathology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;30:30. PubMed PMID: 27914636. English.
17. Abraha I, Romagnoli C, Montedori A, Cirocchi R.Thoracic stent graft versus surgery for thoracic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD006796. PubMed PMID: 27265222. English.
18. Kanaoka Y, Ohki T, Maeda K, Baba T.Analysis of risk factors for early type I endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm
188
https://t.me/med1917
V. M. Rodriguez et al.
repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;19:19. PubMed PMID: 27760812. English.
19. Kent WD, Appoo JJ, Bavaria JE, Herget EJ, Moeller P, Pochettino A, etal. Results of type II hybrid arch repair with zone 0 stent graft deployment for complex aortic arch pathology. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2951–5. PubMed PMID: 25125209. English.
20. Hajibandeh S, Antoniou SA, Torella F, Antoniou GA. Meta­analysis of left subclavian artery coverage with and without revas­cularization in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23(4):634–41.
21. Hogendoorn W, Schlosser FJ, Moll FL, Sumpio BE, Muhs BE. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the chimney graft technique. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(2):502–11. PubMed PMID:
23697513. English.
22. Mangialardi N, Ronchey S, Malaj A, Fazzini S, Alberti V, Ardita V, etal. Value and limitations of chimney grafts to treat arch lesions. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;56(4):503–11. PubMed PMID: 25765852. English.
23. Sugiura K, Sonesson B, Akesson M, Bjorses K, Holst J, Malina M. The applicability of chimney grafts in the aortic arch. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;50(4):475–81. PubMed PMID: 19734832. English.
24. Lioupis C, Abraham CZ.Results and challenges for the endovas­cular repair of aortic arch aneurysms. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2011;23(3):202–13. PubMed PMID: 21821619. English.
25. Haulon S, Greenberg RK, Spear R, Eagleton M, Abraham C, Lioupis C, et al. Global experience with an inner branched arch endograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(4):1709–16. PubMed PMID: 24685375. English.
26. Bachet J, Guilmet D, Goudot B, Dreyfus GD, Delentdecker P, Brodaty D, etal. Antegrade cerebral perfusion with cold blood: a 13-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(6):1874–8; discus­sion 91–4. PubMed PMID: 10391330. English.
27. Harrington DK, Walker AS, Kaukuntla H, Bracewell RM, Clutton­Brock TH, Faroqui M, etal. Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion attenuates brain metabolic decit in aortic arch surgery: a prospec­tive randomized trial. Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II231–6. PubMed PMID: 15364868. English.
28. Westaby S, Katsumata T, Vaccari G.Arch and descending aortic aneurysms: inuence of perfusion technique on neurological out­come. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15(2):180–5. PubMed PMID:
10219551. English.
29. Isselbacher EM.Aortic dissection. In: Creager MA, editor. Atlas of vascular disease. London: Current Medicine Group; 2003.
Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms
https://t.me/med1917
AshokVenkataraman andJereyP.Schwartz
13
Introduction
Thoracic aortic disease is a complex process and a result of several histopathologic processes. Although abdominal aor­tic aneurysms (AAAs) and ascending aortic aneurysms are more common, descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and thoracoabdominal (TAAAs) aneurysms are not rare. The incidence has been steadily increasing and a recent study suggests an estimated incidence approaching 10.4 cases per 100,000 person-years [1]. TAA repair is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The focus of this chapter is on TAAAs dened by anatomy, arising from the left sub­clavian artery to the aortic bifurcation.
The earliest report of successful repairs of a thoracoab­dominal aneurysm in the United States was in 1955 by Etheredge [2]. Cooley and DeBakey, known pioneers within this eld, also reported total repairs via a thoracoabdominal incision utilizing a homograft conduit initially, subsequently involving knitted Dacron grafts as conduits [3]. Crawford is attributed with pioneering the evolution of techniques to include pedicled visceral segment anastomoses of celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal vessels [4]. Over the years, techniques performed at major centers today have evolved to utilize cardiopulmonary bypass, hypothermic circulatory arrest, and cerebrospinal uid drainage amongst other novel modications.
A. Venkataraman Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
J. P. Schwartz ( Lung Transplant Program & Aortic Center, Department of Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
*)
Denition
Thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) result from the continuous dilation of the descending thoracic and abdom­inal aorta secondary to weakening and expansion of the aortic wall. By denition, the dilatation is 1.5 times its normal value [5]. TAAAs account for approximately 10% when all aneurysms of the thoracic aorta are considered [6]. Dening anatomic sizes is critical to help identify pathologic aortic growth because aortic diameter is the strongest predictor of rupture. The “hinge points” at which likelihood of rupture or dissection increases precipitously are seen at 5.5 cm for ascending and 6.5 cm for the descending aorta [7]. The challenge is weighing the risks of surgery versus that of continued surveillance and pos­sible rupture or dissection.
With respect to TAAAs, multiple congurations occur anywhere from the origin of the left subclavian artery to the aortoiliac bifurcation. Crawford described the rst classi­cation scheme based on the anatomic extent of the aneu­rysm in 1986 [8]. Type I (25%) involves most of the descending thoracic aorta from the origin of the left subcla­vian to the suprarenal abdominal aorta. Type II (approxi­mately 30% of all TAAAs) is the most extensive, extending from the subclavian to the aortoiliac bifurcation. Type III (<25%) involves the distal thoracic aorta to the aortoiliac bifurcation. Type IV TAAAs (<25%) are limited to the abdominal aorta below the diaphragm, including visceral and renal arteries. A Type V classication was added later referring to distal thoracic aorta extension including the celiac and superior mesenteric origins but excluding the renal arteries [9] (Fig.13.1).
Indications for operative repair can range from elective interventions when aneurysmal size approaches a critical point to urgent or emergent surgical intervention for acute dissection, free rupture or associated complications such as visceral and extremity malperfusion.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 R. S. Dieter et al. (eds.), Diseases of the Aorta, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11322-3_13
189
190
II
III IV V
https://t.me/med1917
A. Venkataraman and J. P. Schwartz
Normal
I
th
6
th
6
Fig. 13.1 Clark classication for thoracoabdominal aneurysm
13 Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms
https://t.me/med1917
191
Epidemiology
Population studies have indicated an incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysms in the range of approximately 10 new aneu­rysms per 100,000 person-years [1]. Up to 80% of these will eventually rupture, owing to a 10–20% 5-year survival of patients who remain untreated. The increasing prevalence of TAAAs has been attributed to several factors including an aging population, improved and more readily accessible imaging techniques, and increased patient and physician awareness [10]. Females tend to develop TAAAs later in life than men but are at a higher risk of rupture, and advanced age confers a higher risk in both sexes [11].
Pathogenesis
Development of TAAA is multifactorial, similar to that of other aneurysms, a complicated dynamic process involving both cellular and extracellular processes. Evidence suggests that extracellular matrix degradation by matric metallopro­teinases (MMPs) exceeds matrix production and repair dur­ing aneurysm formation [12]. The capacitance and elasticity of the aortic wall is largely from its medial layer composed mainly of structural proteins such as collagen and elastin. Degradation of these proteins leads to medial degeneration and eventual weakening of the aortic wall [13]. Hemodynamic forces on the aortic wall, intrinsic changes in the composi­tion of the wall and increasing stiffness and loss of elasticity lead to subsequent dilatation. A vicious cycle is created as the diameter of the aorta increases as the wall tension increases as dened by the law of Laplace, wherein the wall tension is proportional to the pressure applied by the radius of the conduit.
Medial degeneration, part of the normal aging process, is worsened by clinical conditions such as atherosclerosis and hypertension [14]. Genetic abnormalities such as Marfan’s syndrome and other connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers–Danlos and Loeys–Dietz syndromes also contribute to medial degeneration [15]. Turner syndrome, polycystic kidney disease, syphilis, arteritis, and traumatic injury are amongst other disorders that are associated with aortic aneu­rysms in similar fashion [16]. Whilst 80% of TAAAs are sec­ondary to medial degeneration, approximately 15–20% are caused by dissection [17].
It is postulated that atherosclerosis plays a role in aneu­rysm formation, particularly in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta. True causality is unclear but the two condi­tions occur simultaneously in a majority of patients. Risk factors for TAAAs are thus similar to those for atherosclero­sis. These include primarily smoking, hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and family history. Interestingly, patients with
TAAAs have a much lower incidence of coronary artery dis­ease (CAD) (less than 30%) than those patients with abdomi­nal aortic aneurysms (greater than 70%) [18].
Indications forRepair
The decision when to operate on a patient with a TAAA essentially involves an assessment of the likelihood of aortic rupture versus the operative risk of the individual patient. Endovascular techniques with its lower short-term mortality and morbidity continue to evolve and will in future be an important factor in the decision making for intervention. The patient’s physiologic reserve and vascular anatomy deter­mine whether open or an endovascular approach would be more suitable. Recent guidelines have been issued tailored to the when and how to repair with descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms [19].
Natural history studies have documented an extremely high risk of rupture and death if TAAAs are left untreated and therefore all TAAAs should be considered for repair [20]. Symptomatic aneurysms regardless of size or anatomic extent should be addressed surgically. Symptoms usually present as pain and pressure that may be often described as chest pain radiating to the back or as intrascapular, with a “stabbing” or “tearing” quality. However, few patients pres­ent with symptoms prior to an acute event [21].
Size criteria have been extensively debated in the litera­ture, with groups advocating repair anywhere between 5 and 10 cm [22]. This is further complicated by the fact that degenerative TAAAs are not uniform in size and involve segments of the aorta with varying diameters and morphol­ogy. Recent literature points toward the need for adjustment of body surface area and an evaluation of relative aortic size rather than absolute aortic size, to be incorporated into deci­sion making about threshold for repair and the risk of rup­ture [23].
Elefteriades etal. have reported extensively on the natural history and rupture risk of thoracic aorta stratied by diam­eter and the guidelines outlined have remained the current benchmark used for intervention [24].
I. Rupture II. Acute dissection resulting in malperfusion or other life-
altering complications
III. Symptomatic states
(a) Pain consistent with rupture and unexplained by
other causes
(b) Compression of adjacent organs
IV. Documented enlargement 1 cm/year or substantial
growth approaching absolute size criteria
V. Absolute size >6.5cm or >6.0cm in patients with con-
nective tissue disorders
192
https://t.me/med1917
A. Venkataraman and J. P. Schwartz
All size criteria per guidelines are based on the premise that the ideal time to intervention is when the annual risk of rupture exceeds the perceived mortality of the proposed procedure.
Preoperative Workup
The physiologic stress on a patient undergoing open TAAA repair is unparalleled and as such extensive preoperative workup to ensure optimal tness for surgery is mandatory. Pulmonary and renal function evaluation, in addition to car­diovascular risk evaluation is imperative.
Cardiac
The typical patient undergoing TAAA is elderly and the inci­dence of impaired myocardial function and the presence of atherosclerotic coronary disease are moderate, thereby mak­ing cardiac disease the leading cause of mortality after open TAAA repair [25]. Therefore, preoperative electrocardio­gram, echocardiogram, and coronary angiography are rou­tine. In the elective setting, coronary artery revascularization either by coronary angioplasty and stenting or by coronary artery bypass grafting may be indicated prior to intervention for the TAAA.The use of bare metal stents versus drug elut­ing stents should be considered particularly in view of the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy required.
outcome after operative repair [27]. Endovascular repairs require even closer attention to preoperative renal function given the use of nephrotoxic contrast agents during these procedures.
Cerebral
Intracranial aneurysms are thought to share pathophysiologic features with TAAA and clinical association between these two conditions has been well established in recent years. Patients with TAA have a 9% prevalence of intracranial aneurysms, which is ninefold greater than the general popu­lation [28]. In light of this association, notable groups have made it a policy within their practices to image the brain of all patients prior to surgery on the thoracic aorta and obtain neurosurgical consultations should a cerebral aneurysm be identied [29].
Functional Status
Considering the surgical insult involved in open repair of TAAA, preoperative functional status of the patient is a key predictor of perioperative mortality [30]. Interestingly, advanced age alone does not impair return to normal func­tional status postoperatively and thus patients with asymp­tomatic thoracic aneurysms should not be denied elective replacement on the basis of age alone [31].
Pulmonary
Pulmonary complications after open TAAA are common, and the incidence of COPD is high in this patient population (estimated between 30% and 40%) and it is associated with increased perioperative mortality [25]. Also, single lung ventilation is routinely utilized in open TAAA repair. As such, preoperative spirometry and arterial blood gas analy­sis is strongly recommended and performed routinely. Smoking cessation in the weeks preceding surgery, pulmo­nary rehabilitation to improve lung capacity, and an attempt to lose weight in obese patients has all been shown to be benecial.
Renal
Chronic renal failure is the strongest predictor of periopera­tive renal failure and mortality after TAAA repair (increasing risk threefold), second only to aortic rupture [26]. Routinely assessed by laboratory tests such as blood urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations, recent evidence indicates calcula­tion of glomerular ltration rate is superior as a predictor of
Anesthesia/Intraoperative Monitoring
Following induction of general anesthesia, a double lumen endotracheal tube is inserted. Central access is then obtained and a pulmonary artery catheter placed for hemodynamic monitoring. A Foley catheter is placed and arterial lines are placed in both upper and lower extremities (typically right radial and right femoral) to monitor both proximal and distal perfusion during aortic clamping.
Lumbar cerebrospinal uid drains are routinely used for extensive I and II repairs, maintaining an intrathecal pressure of less than 10mmHg (Fig.13.2). This has been shown to appreciably lower the probability of neurological decit [9]. In the case of a bloody insertion during the initial setting, consideration should be given for delaying surgery and admission of patient a day prior to elective surgery and placement of lumbar drain to reduce the risk of subsequent intraoperative bleeding. In the majority of cases, and particu­larly in Type II repairs or those requiring hypothermic circulatory arrest, electrodes are placed cranially and periph­erally for monitoring of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials to assess intraoperative spinal cord protection and perfusion [32].
13 Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms
https://t.me/med1917
193
Fig. 13.3 Right lateral decubitus position, posterior view
Fig. 13.2 Spinal drain inserted preoperatively
Surgical Approach
Exposure oftheThoracoabdominal Aorta
Regardless of the extent of the TAAA repair, the patient is routinely placed in the right lateral decubitus position with the operating room table exed at the waist (Figs.13.3 and 13.4). A beanbag is utilized to maintain appropriate position is nec­essary; the left arm is secured over the patient using an appro-
extended arms). The hips and shoulders are taped down after all bony prominences are appropriately padded. The shoulders are typically rotated posteriorly 10–20° and the hips are rotated 50–60° posteriorly (attened) with a folded sheet placed underneath the buttocks and a rolled sheet used as a shoulder roll. The right femoral arterial line is prepped into the eld.
The procedure is started with exposure of the left femoral vessels after an appropriate groin incision. Access to the descending thoracic aorta and distal arch is gained by a tho­racoabdominal incision (Fig.13.5). The scapular tip is iden­tied and marked and its location is relevant the higher the extent of the pathology is on the thoracic aorta. For expo­sure of the proximal descending aorta, the incision is started two ngerbreadths beneath the tip of the scapula, curved posteriorly—midway between the scapular edge and the spine. The lower extent of the incision is usually midway between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and umbilicus.
Fig. 13.4 Right lateral decubitus position, anterior view
Fig. 13.5 Thoracoabdominal incision, transection of diaphragm dem-
onstrated, followed by medial visceral rotation
The curve of the incision is along the ribs and eventually almost parallel in a long axis direction anatomically to the right of scapular tip. The level of the rib entry into the tho­racic cavity is based on the proximal extent of the intended repair. Typically, the fourth or fth interspace is appropriate