Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_891_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
33 Мб
Скачать
This page intentionally left blank
https://t.me/medicina_free
CHAPTER 30
https://t.me/medicina_free
The Appendix
1. A 25-year-old man presents with migratory right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain, leukocytosis, and a computed tomography (CT) scan consistent with acute, uncompli­cated appendicitis. He is physiologically normal and it is 2 AM. You are planning an appendectomy, what differ­ence might be expected in his outcome if his operation is delayed until the next morning? A. Increased risk of an intra-abdominal abscess B. Increased risk of surgical-site infection C. Decreased operative time D. Increased risk of perforation E. No difference in perforation rates, surgical-site
infection, abscess, conversion rate, or operative time
2. A 55-year-old man has computed tomography (CT) evidence of complicated appendicitis with a contained abscess in the right lower quadrant (RLQ). He is mildly tachycardic, afebrile, and normotensive with local RLQ tenderness but no peritonitis. What is the optimal approach to this patient? A. Immediate laparotomy B. Laparoscopic exploration and abscess drainage C. Percutaneous drainage, intravenous (IV) fluids,
bowel rest, and broad spectrum antibiotics
D. IV fluids, bowel rest, and broad spectrum antibiotics
Answer: E
Emergent surgery is often performed in patients with appen­dicitis, but studies have evaluated the performance of urgent surgery (waiting < 12 hours) in a semi-elective setting after administering antibiotics upon admission. The studies did not reveal any significant difference in outcomes, except for a slightly longer hospital stay in those undergoing urgent sur­gery. Currently, delaying surgery <12 hours is acceptable in patients with short duration of symptoms (<48 hours) and in nonperforated, non-gangrenous appendicitis. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1335.)
Answer: C
Perforated appendicitis can be managed either operatively or nonoperatively. Immediate surgery is necessary in patients that appear septic, but this is usually associated with higher complications, including abscesses and enterocutaneous fistulae due to dense adhesions and inflammation. The man­agement of long-duration, complicated appendicitis is often staged. Patients are resuscitated and treated with IV antibiot­ics. Patients with long-standing perforation are better treated with adequate percutaneous image-guided drainage. This strategy is successful in 79% of patients who achieve complete resolution, which occurs more often in lower-grade abscesses, trans-gluteal drainage, and with CT- (vs. ultrasound-) guided drainage. Operative intervention is performed in patients who fail conservative management and in patients with free intra-peritoneal perforation. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1335.)
3. An 8-year-old boy presents to the emergency depart­ment complaining of generalized abdominal pain over the past 24 hours. Laboratory tests reveal a leukocytosis of 13,000 and he is tender in the right lower quadrant (RLQ) on physical examination. He is taken to the oper­ating room for laparoscopic appendectomy. Removal of the appendix has been associated with a protective effect to which of the following? A. Crohn colitis B. Ulcerative colitis C. Clostridium difficile D. Carcinoid
Answer: B
Previously considered a vestigial organ, the appendix is now linked to the development and preservation of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) and to the maintenance of intestinal flora. It has been suggested that appendectomy is associated with increased C. difficile infections and increased subsequent cancer (colon, esophageal) as a result of microbial alteration, although this is currently unproven. The protective effect of an early appendectomy against development of ulcerative colitis has been proposed to be mechanistically linked to the release of dimeric forms of IgA from plasma B cells and the Th2 response mediated by IL-13–producing natural killer T cells. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1331.)
259
260
https://t.me/medicina_free
4. While reviewing pathology of a recent laparoscopic appendectomy, you note that in addition to acute appen­dicitis, the patient had a 1.5-cm carcinoid tumor located at the base of the appendix with mesenteric invasion. The patient is otherwise healthy and recovering well from surgery. What would you recommend? A. No additional therapy is necessary. B. Right hemicolectomy.
CHAPTER 30
C. Radical appendectomy. D. Adjuvant chemotherapy.
The Appendix
5. A previously healthy 20-year-old man was brought to the emergency room with a 10-hour history of fever, anorexia, vomiting, and pain in the right lower abdo­men. On examination, he has tenderness localized to McBurney’s point. His laboratory data show leukocyto­sis of 13,000/mm3. On surgical exploration, you note a normal-appearing appendix and cecum. The terminal ileum appeared inflamed and edematous, concerning for Crohn disease without stigmata of obstruction. What is the most appropriate further course of action? A. Abort the planned appendectomy. B. Resect the inflamed terminal ileum. C. Bypass the inflamed ileum by performing
ileo-colostomy.
D. Perform an appendectomy if the base is uninflamed.
Answer: B
Appendiceal carcinoid tumors are submucosal rubbery masses that are detected incidentally on the appendix. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix are relatively indolent but can develop nodal or hepatic metastases. Infrequently, these can be associated with carcinoid syndrome if there are hepatic metastases (2.9%). Upon incidental findings of a suspected carcinoid, the surgeon must evaluate the nodal basin along the ileocolic pedicle and also examine the liver for any signs of metastases. For lesions that are <1 cm (95% of all lesions), a negative margin appendectomy is adequate. For tumors ≥2 cm, a right hemicolectomy is recommended. For lesions 1 to 2 cm in size, there is no consensus on a completion col­ectomy. A right colectomy is often performed for mesenteric invasion, enlarged nodes, or positive or unclear margins. Measurement of serum chromogranin A is recommended. A radical appendectomy is not a described operation and adjuvant chemotherapy could be considered but only after definitive surgical care. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1338.)
Answer: D
Upon performing a laparoscopy or laparotomy for suspected appendicitis, if one finds no evidence of appendicitis, a thor­ough exploration of the peritoneum must be performed to rule out contributing pathology. A normal appendix is often removed to reduce future diagnostic dilemma. Management of incidentally found common conditions is summarized in Table 30-1. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1337 and Table 30-3.)
TABLE 30-1 Management of Intraoperative Findings Mimicking Appendicitis
Ovarian torsion Conservative management with detorsion and oophoropexy
Crohn terminal ileitis Appendectomy if base uninflamed
Meckel diverticulitis Segmental small bowel resection and primary anastomosis
Appendiceal mass Laparoscopic appendectomy/ ileocecectomy without capsular disruption or spillage and retrieval in a bag
6. During a laparoscopic appendectomy on a 59-year-old woman with clinical presentation of acute appendicitis, you find an enlarged cystic mass replacing the appendix with a normal appendiceal stump. The mass is nonad­herent to the rest of the structures, and the rest of the abdominal cavity appears normal. What is the most appropriate next step? A. Perform a right hemicolectomy after obtaining con-
sent from the family
B. Close the abdomen and arrange a return visit for
reevaluation
C. Laparoscopically excise the abnormal appendix with-
out capsular disruption by dividing the appendix at the normal stump and retrieve the specimen in a bag
D. Limited ileocecectomy
Answer: C
Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) are nonmalignant neoplasms of the appendix that present in a third of cases with appendicitis. It is important to carefully assess for the presence of ascites, peritoneal disease, and scal­loping of the liver surface on imaging upon initial evaluation. A reliable diagnosis cannot be established using imaging alone, and it is recommended that surgical excision without capsular disruption is undertaken. The importance of care­ful handling of a LAMN and the avoidance of rupture cannot be overemphasized because the intraperitoneal spread of epi­thelial cells with subsequent development of pseudomyxoma peritonei is a dreaded consequence. In cases where a homo­geneous cyst without nodularity or signs of dissemination is encountered, laparoscopic excision is acceptable, provided
that a stapler is fired across the base of the cecum to avoid a
https://t.me/medicina_free
positive margin. The specimen should be placed in a plastic bag and carefully removed without disruption. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1339.)
261
7. A 30-year-old woman presented with pain in the right lower abdomen, fever, nausea, and leukocytosis. With a diagnosis of appendicitis, you took her to operating room (OR) for laparoscopic appendectomy. During the surgery, you noticed the appendix base is perforated and appeared nonviable (Fig. 30-1). What is the most appro­priate management? A. Place a drain and close the abdomen B. Place an endoloop around the site of perforation and
divide the appendix
C. Resect the appendix at the site of perforation and
suture the base
D. Perform appendectomy using a stapling device, with
staple line through the healthy cecum
Answer: D
In the case of a nonviable appendix base, a staple line through the cecum that avoids the ileocecal valve might be sufficient, unless significant inflammation is present. The appendix is retrieved through the midline port in a specimen bag, especially if an appendiceal lesion is suspected. If a peri­appendiceal phlegmon is encountered or if the operation is being performed for perforated appendicitis, careful sweeping of the bowel with a blunt dissector can release the appendix. It is important to carefully separate adjacent bowel, which can be friable in such settings. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1336.)
CHAPTER 30
The Appendix
FIG. 30-1. Gangrenous appendicitis with
perforation is seen at laparoscopy.
8. A 26-year-old man presents with a 1-day history of right lower abdominal pain and fever. He undergoes a laparo­scopic converted to open appendectomy due to difficulty in dissecting the appendiceal stump. Intraoperatively, he is noted to have a perforated appendix base with mini­mal peritoneal contamination. The appendectomy is completed by stapling the cecum at a healthy area. What is the most appropriate postoperative antibiotic therapy? A. Single dose cefazolin. B. Cefazolin and metronidazole for 3 to 4 days. C. Piperacillin/Tazobactam for 7 to 8 days. D. Postoperative antibiotics are not needed.
9. A 24-year-old woman presents with pain in her abdo­men, fever and tenderness in right lower quadrant for the last 8 hours. A computed tomography (CT) scan reveals uncomplicated appendicitis. She is concerned about an appendectomy and is afraid of surgery. She asks for alter­nate treatment options. What are appropriate alternate options for this otherwise healthy patient? A. Counsel that surgery is the only option. B. Prescribe oral fluoroquinolones with analgesics and
ask her to follow up after a week. C. Admit and start intravenous (IV) antibiotics. D. Reassure her that surgery is not emergent, and she
can reconsider it after a few weeks.
Answer: B
In patients with perforated appendicitis undergoing operative intervention, preoperative antibiotics are necessary to cover gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes. Monotherapy with piperacillin/tazobactam or combination of cephalosporin with metronidazole are reasonable choices. The duration of postoperative antibiotics is generally <4 days once complete source control has been achieved (STOP-IT trial). Patients with incomplete drainage, persistent catheters, complica­tions from surgery, and uncertain resolution of inflammation might need a longer duration of antibiotics. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1336.)
Answer: C
The preferred approach to manage patients with uncompli­cated appendicitis is an appendectomy. Several recent ran­domized trials and cohort studies have examined the role of nonoperative management of adult patients with appen­dicitis. A majority of the patients in the nonoperative arm received IV antibiotics for a short course followed by a course of a fluoroquinolone and metronidazole, or oral amoxicil­lin/clavulanic acid. Currently, conservative management can be offered to informed patients using techniques of shared decision-making, but it is not the standard modality of man­agement of appendicitis, except in patients with significant phobia of surgery (Fig. 30-2). (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1335.)
262
https://t.me/medicina_free
CHAPTER 30
The Appendix
FIG. 30-2. Coronal view of CT shows
inflammatory changes involving the appendix without evidence of abscess, consistent with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
10. A 32-year-old otherwise healthy male patient presents with suspicious symptoms of appendicitis but the physi­cal examination is inconclusive. Which statement about imaging in this clinical situation is correct? A. An ultrasound is preferred to computed tomography
(CT) scan due to its higher sensitivity and reduced risk of radiation to patients.
B. A CT finding of enlarged appendiceal lumen and
double wall thickness (>6 mm) suggests inflamma­tory enteritis instead of appendicitis.
C. Low dose CT scans (2 mSv) have equivalent clinical
accuracy as high dose CT scans in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
D. Graded compression ultrasound suggestive of eas-
ily compressible appendix < 5 mm in diameter is pathognomonic of appendicitis.
Answer: C
Imaging is often utilized to confirm a diagnosis of appendi­citis because a negative operation rate is acceptable in <10% of male patients and <20% of female patients. A contrast­enhanced CT scan has a sensitivity of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–0.97) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.93–
0.97) in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Features on a CT scan that suggest appendicitis include enlarged lumen and double wall thickness (>6 mm), wall thickening (>2 mm), periap­pendiceal fat stranding, appendiceal wall thickening, and/or an appendicolith. While there remains a concern of ionizing radiation exposure with a CT scan, typical low-dose CT scans result in exposure of 2 to 4 mSv, which is not significantly higher than background radiation (3.1 mSv). Recent trials have also suggested that although low-dose CT scans of 2 mSv do not generate high-resolution images, using these lower resolution images does not affect clinical outcomes. Ultraso­nography has a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.90) and a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83–0.95). Graded compression ultrasonography is used to identify the anteroposterior diam­eter of the appendix. An easily compressible appendix <5 mm in diameter generally rules out appendicitis. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1333.)
CHAPTER 31
Diaphragm
https://t.me/medicina_free
Liver
1. With regard to hepatic anatomy, the falciform ligament divides the _______ from the _______: A. caudate lobe, quadrate lobe B. right lobe, left lobe C. left medial section, left lateral section D. left medial section, right lobe
Right triangular ligament
Answer: C
The falciform ligament divides the left lateral section from the left medial section. The plane between the gallbladder fossa and the inferior vena cava (IVC)—referred to as Cantlie line—divides the right and left lobes. The falciform ligament, along with the round, triangular, and coronary ligaments may be divided in a bloodless plane during liver resection (Figs. 31-1 through 31-3). (See Schwartz 11th ed., Figs. 31-1 through 31-3, p. 1347.)
Left triangular ligament
Falciform ligament
Round ligament
FIG. 31-1. Hepatic ligaments
suspending the liver to the diaphragm and anterior abdominal wall.
FIG. 31-2. In situ liver hilar anatomy
with hepatoduodenal and gastrohepatic ligaments. Foramen of Winslow is depicted.
Liver in situ
Foramen of Winslow
Gastrohepatic ligament
Open hepato­duodenal ligament
263
264
https://t.me/medicina_free
Right lobe Left lobe
II
CHAPTER 31
Liver
FIG. 31-3. Couinaud’s liver
segments (I through VIII) numbered in a clockwise manner. The left lobe includes segments II to IV, the right lobe includes segments V to VIII, and the caudate lobe is segment I. IVC = inferior vena cava.
IVa
VIII
VII
IVb
V
VI
Right lobe Left lobe
V
VI
VII
IVCCaudate lobe
III
IVb
III
I
II
2. The most common variant of normal hepatic artery anatomy is: A. Replaced left hepatic artery from the left gastric
ar ter y.
B. Completely replaced common hepatic artery from
the superior mesenteric artery. C. Replaced right and left hepatic arteries. D. Replaced right hepatic artery from the superior mes-
enteric artery.
Answer: D
Understanding the anatomic variants of the hepatic arte­rial supply is important to avoid complications during liver surgery. The standard arterial anatomy is as follows: the com­mon hepatic artery arises from the celiac trunk, and then divides into the gastroduodenal and proper hepatic artery. In a standard configuration, the proper hepatic artery gives rise to the right gastric artery, but this is variable. The proper hepatic artery then divides into the right and left hepatic artery. How­ever, this standard arterial configuration only occurs in 76% of patients. The most common variants include: replaced or accessory right hepatic artery from the superior mesen­teric artery (10%–15%), replaced left hepatic artery from the left gastric artery (3%–10%), replaced right and left hepatic arteries (1%–2%), and the completely replaced common hepatic artery from the superior mesenteric artery (1%–2%) (Figs. 31-4 and 31-5). (See Schwartz 11th ed., Figs. 31-4 and 31-5, p. 1349.)
LHA
https://t.me/medicina_free
265
RHA
Hepatic artery proper Right gastric artery Common hepatic artery
Gastroduodenal artery
FIG. 31-4. Arterial anatomy of the upper abdomen and liver, including the celiac trunk and
hepatic artery branches. a. = artery; LHA = left hepatic artery; RHA = right hepatic artery.
Left gastric artery
Celiac trunk
Splenic artery
CHAPTER 31
Liver
Replaced right hepatic artery from SMA (10%–15%)
Replaced right and replaced left hepatic arteries (1%–2%)
FIG. 31-5. Common hepatic artery anatomic variants. SMA = superior mesenteric artery.
3. Which of the following correctly pairs the segments of the liver and their associated systemic venous drainage? A. Segments I, II, III: right hepatic vein B. Segment IV: right hepatic vein C. Segment I: IVC D. Segments V, VI, VII, VIII: left hepatic vein
Replaced left hepatic artery from left gastric artery (3%–10%)
Completely replaced common hepatic artery from SMA (1%–2%)
Answer: C
There are three hepatic veins (right, middle, and left) that serve as the outflow for the hepatic circulation and drain into the suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). The right hepatic vein drains segments V–VIII; the middle hepatic vein drains segment IV, as well as segments V and VIII; and the left hepatic vein drains segments II and III. The caudate lobe (segment I) drains directly into the IVC (Fig. 31-6). (See Schwartz 11th ed., Fig. 31-8, p. 1350.)
266
IVC
https://t.me/medicina_free
IVC and 3 HVs
CHAPTER 31
Liver
Posterior segment structures
Right HV
Anterior segment structures
Right lobe
Middle hepatic v.
Lateral segment structures
Left HV
Left lobe
Middle HV
Medial segment structures
Falciform ligament
Hepatic a.
Portal v.
Gallbladder
FIG. 31-6. Confluence of the three hepatic veins (HVs) and the inferior vena cava (IVC). Note that the middle and left HVs drain
into a common trunk before entering the IVC. a. = artery; v. = vein. (Adapted with permission from Cameron JL: Atlas of Surgery. Vol. I, Gallbladder and Biliary Tract, the Liver, Portasystemic Shunts, the Pancreas. Toronto: BC Decker; 1990.)
4. There is considerable variability in hepatic duct conflu­ence anatomy, in 60%–70% of cases what is the normal anatomy? A. Hepatic ducts follow arterial branching inside the
liver.
B. The right anterior hepatic duct enters the liver above
the hilar plate and the posterior duct enters segment V, lateral to the portal vein.
C. The left hepatic duct has a short extrahepatic course,
coursing with the left portal vein.
D. Hepatic ducts follow hepatic vein branching inside
the liver.
Answer: A
In general, the hepatic ducts follow the arterial branching pattern inside the liver. The right anterior hepatic duct usu­ally enters the liver above the hilar plate, whereas the right posterior duct dives behind the right portal vein and can be found on the surface of the caudate process before entering the liver. The left hepatic duct typically has a longer extra­hepatic course before giving off segmental branches behind the left portal vein at the base of the umbilical fissure. There is a nonstandard hepatic duct confluence with acces­sory or aberrant ducts (Fig. 31-7). (See Schwartz 11th ed., Fig. 31-9, p. 1351.)
267
ra
https://t.me/medicina_free
A: Normal bifurcation 57% B: Trifurcation of 3 ducts 12%
C: R anterior (C1, 16%) or R posterior (C2, 4%) duct draining into CHD
D: R posterior (D1, 5%) or R anterior duct (D2, 1%) draining into the left hepatic duct
E: Absence of hepatic duct confluence 3%
C1
5%
I
16%
IV
lh
lh
rp
rp
lh
III
ra
II
rp
rp
A57% B12%
ra
rp
C20%
ra
rp
D6%
D1
ra
rp
E3%
2%
E1
ra
rp
ra
lh
lh
CHAPTER 31
4%
C2
ra
Liver
lh
1%
D2
1%
E2
III
IV
II
I
F: Drainage of R posterior duct into cystic duct 2%
FIG. 31-7. Main variations of hepatic duct confluence. As described by Couinaud in 1957, the bifurcation of
the hepatic ducts has a variable pattern in approximately 40% of cases. CHD = common hepatic duct; lh = left hepatic; R = right; ra = right anterior; rp = right posterior. (Reproduced with permission from Blumgart LH, Fong Y: Surgery of the Liver and Biliary Tract, 3rd ed, Vol. I. London: Elsevier; 2000.)
5. In a fasting state, how does the liver generate glucose? A. Early and persistent breakdown of glycogen storage B. Early glycogen breakdown through glycogenolysis
and later gluconeogenesis from lactate, amino acids, and glycerol
C. Immediate gluconeogenesis from noncarbohy-
drate precursors including lactate, amino acids, and glycerol
D. Protein catabolism through amino acid deamination
ra
rp
lh
F2%
Answer: B
The liver maintains glucose concentrations in a normal range over both short and long periods by performing sev­eral important roles in carbohydrate metabolism. In the fast­ing state, the liver ensures a sufficient supply of glucose to the central nervous system. The liver can produce glucose by breaking down glycogen through glycogenolysis and by de novo synthesis of glucose through gluconeogenesis from noncarbohydrate precursors such as lactate, amino acids, and glycerol. In the postprandial state, excess circulating glucose is removed by glycogen synthesis or glycolysis and lipogen­esis. (See Schwartz 11th ed., p. 1351.)