Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2704_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
35 Мб
Скачать
10
Pericardial and Myocardial Disease
Jennifer L. Strande
PERICARDIAL DISEASE
The pericardium is a thin, fibrous sac that envelops the heart and consists of two layers: visceral and parietal. The space between these two layers contains a small amount of fluid (15 to 50 mL), which is a plasma ultrafiltrate. The pericardium has mechanical, immunologic, and anatomic barrier functions.
Due to a paucity of randomized trial data and absence of practice guideline statements, the recommendations for assessment and treat­ment of pericardial disorders in this chapter are largely based on expert opinion and professional consensus.
Acute Pericarditis
Definition and Epidemiology
Acute pericarditis or inflammation of the pericardium has several causes. The exact incidence of acute pericarditis is unknown because a subclinical course is common.
Pathology
About 85% of cases are from idiopathic or viral causes. Less com­monly, infection (other than viral), uremia, trauma, metabolic dis­orders, autoimmune disorders, and neoplastic involvement can also cause pericarditis. Causes of acute pericarditis are listed in Table 10.1.
Clinical Presentation
The classic manifestation of acute pericarditis is severe and sharp chest pain, which is often aggravated by a supine position, inspiration, and cough and relieved by sitting up and leaning forward. The pain is usu­ally substernal and left precordial, and may radiate to the neck, shoul­der, and scapular ridge, mimicking that of myocardial ischemia. Chest discomfort may be mild or absent in patients with connective tissue disorders, uremia, or neoplastic involvement. Patients may also have symptoms of low-grade fever, malaise, dyspnea, and less frequently, hiccups (i.e., phrenic nerve irritation).
In the absence of significant pericardial effusion, results of the inspection and palpation of the precordium are normal. A high­pitched, rasping pericardial friction rub is heard on cardiac aus­cultation in most patients with acute pericarditis. It may have three components corresponding to atrial contraction, ventricular systole, and early diastole, and it is best appreciated at end expiration with the patient leaning forward. It can be intermittent, and serial auscultation is recommended.
Diagnosis
The electrocardiographic (ECG) changes of acute pericarditis typically evolve over days to weeks. The early stage findings are characterized by diffuse ST segment elevation (i.e., concave upward) with upright T waves and PR depression. PR depression occasionally precedes the
ST segment elevation. Resolution of the ST elevations is followed by diffuse T wave inversion. These ECG changes are not always seen and serial tracings should be obtained.
The laboratory findings of acute idiopathic pericarditis are not spe­cific and consist of mild elevation of the white blood cell count, sedi­mentation rate, and C-reactive protein level. If indicated, specific testing for tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), thyroid dis­ease, or autoimmune disorders is recommended. However, routine per­formance of viral serologic testing has limited utility. Elevation of serum cardiac biomarkers (e.g., creatine kinase, troponin) reflects involvement of the adjacent myocardium. In uncomplicated acute pericarditis, the chest radiograph and echocardiographic findings are normal. Although not essential for the diagnosis of pericarditis, echocardiography is the diagnostic imaging modality of choice for the detection and determina­tion of the hemodynamic significance of a pericardial effusion.
Treatment
Patients with uncomplicated idiopathic or viral pericarditis can be managed as outpatients. For patients with fever, large pericardial effusions, or elevated levels of cardiac biomarkers and for those with possible secondary causes or immunocompromised status, hospital­ization for further investigation and treatment should be considered. Treatment consisting of high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is usually effective. Colchicine with NSAIDs or as monotherapy provides prompt resolution of symptoms and decreases the recurrence rate. The use of glucocorticoids results in rapid symp­tomatic improvement. However, glucocorticoids are associated with higher rates of symptomatic recurrence.
Prognosis
Most patients with idiopathic or viral pericarditis have an unevent­ful clinical course with complete recovery. Possible complications include recurrent pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, and constrictive pericarditis.
Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade
Definition and Epidemiology
Pericardial effusion, an abnormal collection of fluid in the pericardial space, is a relatively common and incidental echocardiographic finding that is encountered in approximately 10% of studies. Cardiac tampon­ade occurs when fluid accumulation results in increased intrapericar­dial pressure, leading to cardiac compression, impaired ventricular filling, and reduced cardiac output. Accumulation of pericardial fluid can be caused by virtually any type of acute pericarditis. Pericardial effusions due to bacterial pericarditis (including tuberculosis), neo­plastic involvement, uremic pericarditis, and trauma have a high inci­dence of progression to tamponade.
123
124 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
TABLE 10.1 Causes of Pericarditis
Idiopathic Infectious
Viral (echovirus, coxsackievirus, adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B
virus, Epstein-Barr virus, human immunodeficiency virus)
Bacterial (Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Mycoplasma
species; Borrelia burgdorferi, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis)
Mycobacterial (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium-
intracellulare)
Fungal (Histoplasma and Coccidioides species) Protozoal
Immune or inflammatory
Connective tissue disease (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid
arthritis, scleroderma) Arteritis (polyarteritis nodosa, temporal arteritis) Late after myocardial infarction (Dressler syndrome), late postcardiotomy or
thoracotomy
Drug induced
Procainamide, hydralazine, isoniazid, cyclosporine
Trauma or damage to adjacent structures
Penetrating trauma Acute myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery, coronary angioplasty,
implantable defibrillators, pacemakers Pneumonia
Neoplastic disease
Primary: mesothelioma, fibrosarcoma, lipoma Secondary (metastatic or direct extension): breast, lung, thyroid carcinoma,
lymphoma, leukemia, melanoma
Radiation induced Miscellaneous
Uremia Hypothyroidism Gout
Pathology
The hemodynamic consequences of a pericardial effusion depend on the rate of accumulation. The normal pericardium has relatively limited reserve volume. The mechanical properties of the parietal pericardium are such that when stretched, it becomes rapidly inelastic and resistant to further expansion. As a result, rapidly accumulating effusions may result in significant hemodynamic compromise with only 100 to 200 mL of fluid. Conversely, when the accumulation of fluid is slow, the pericardium undergoes adaptive changes and can accommodate large (>1500 mL) effusions without the development of tamponade.
Clinical Presentation
The clinical manifestations of a pericardial effusion depend on the size and rate of fluid accumulation and may range from dyspnea, chest discom­fort, and orthopnea to circulatory collapse, pulseless electrical activity, and death. Compression of adjacent structures such as the phrenic nerve and the recurrent laryngeal nerve can result in cough or hiccups and hoarse­ness, respectively. Compression of the esophagus may cause dysphasia.
A normal cardiac examination is not uncommon in patients
with small effusions. With larger effusions, the apical impulse can be decreased or absent, and the cardiac sound may be muffled. In patients with acute pericarditis, disappearance of the pericardial friction rub may indicate development of an effusion. Compression of the left lung base can result in dullness to percussion, egophony, and bronchial breath sounds under the left scapula (i.e., Ewart sign).
Patients with tamponade usually appear to be in distress with tachypnea and tachycardia. The classic physical findings include hypotension, jugular venous distention with an absent y descent, and muffled or absent heart sounds. Pulsus paradoxus, a characteristic physical finding, is defined as a greater than 10 mm Hg of inspiratory decline of the systolic blood pressure. This results from the inspiratory decrease of the left ventricular stroke volume and systemic blood pres­sure. Under normal conditions, the intrathoracic pressure decreases during inspiration, resulting in enhanced right ventricular filling and enlargement. In cases of cardiac tamponade, the total heart volume is fixed, and the right ventricular expansion displaces the interventric­ular septum toward the left ventricle, with consequent reduction of the left ventricular stroke volume and systemic hypotension. Pulsus paradoxus is not pathognomonic of cardiac tamponade and can be detected in severe chronic obstructive airway disease, pulmonary embolism, bronchial asthma, constrictive pericarditis, and hypovole­mic shock.
Diagnosis
The ECG findings of moderate to large pericardial effusions include low-voltage QRS complexes and occasionally electrical (QRS) alter­nans caused by the heart’s swinging motion within the fluid-filled pericardium. The chest radiograph demonstrates an enlarged cardiac silhouette. Transthoracic echocardiography, the imaging modality of choice, provides information regarding the size, location (circumfer­ential vs. loculated), and most importantly, the hemodynamic conse­quences of the pericardial effusion suggesting tamponade.
The two-dimensional findings of tamponade include right atrial and right ventricular collapse, distention of the inferior vena cava, and evidence of increased ventricular interdependence (Fig. 10.1). Doppler quantification of the mitral and tricuspid inflow velocity respiratory variation is more sensitive than two-dimensional echo­cardiography for determining the hemodynamic significance of peri­cardial effusions. Right heart catheterization demonstrates decreased cardiac output, elevated right atrial pressure with diminished or absent y descent, and equalization of the cardiac filling pressures (i.e., right atrial, pulmonary wedge, and diastolic pulmonary artery pressures).
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately identify pericardial effusions and may be used along with echocardiography to assess for loculated effusions, pericar­dial thickening, and extracardiac structures. A diagnostic pericardio­centesis should be performed for evaluating for bacterial, tuberculous, or malignant causes.
Treatment
Routine drainage of pericardial effusions is unnecessary in the absence of hemodynamic compromise. Cardiac tamponade is a life-threaten­ing emergency requiring urgent drainage of the pericardial effusion. Fluid resuscitation should be initiated to increase preload and filling of the cardiac chambers. Inotropic and vasopressor support has limited utility. Surgical drainage is appropriate and therapeutic for loculated, purulent, and tuberculous effusions and for tissue biopsy.
Fluid should be analyzed for pH, cell count, glucose, protein, cho­lesterol, triglycerides, and acid-fast bacilli by Gram stain, culture, cytology, and laboratory tests. For patients with chronic, recurring effusions, the surgical creation of a pleuropericardial window provides a long-term solution.
Prognosis
The underlying cause of the pericardial effusion and the availability of effective treatment determine the prognosis.
CHAPTER 10 Pericardial and Myocardial Disease
40
50
30
20
10
0
125
Systole
PE
RV
LV
PE
Fig. 10.1 Parasternal long axis echocardiographic views of the right ventricle in systole and diastole show
right ventricular diastolic collapse (arrow) in a patient with a large, circumferential pericardial effusion. LV, Left ventricle; PE, pericardial effusion; RV, right ventricle.
Constrictive Pericarditis
Definition and Epidemiology
Pericardial constriction is caused by pericardial inflammation and is a condition characterized by a rigid, scarred pericardium that limits dia­stolic filling of the ventricles, resulting in increased intracardiac pres­sures. The most common causes are infection, prior cardiac surgery, trauma, and irradiation. Less common causes include connective tissue disorders, uremia, and neoplastic involvement of the pericardium. In developing countries, tuberculous pericarditis is a more common cause of pericardial constriction. Often a specific cause cannot be determined.
Diastole
PE
RV
LV
PE
Pathology
Constriction is the end result of pericardial inflammation with scar­ring, fibrosis, calcification, and adhesion of the parietal and visceral layers of the pericardium. Although pericardial thickening is a usual pathologic finding, its absence does not exclude constriction.
Clinical Presentation
In the early stages, symptoms consist of dyspnea, fatigue, decreased exercise tolerance, and lower extremity edema. As the disease pro­gresses, early signs and symptoms may be accompanied by ascites, anasarca, cachexia, and muscle wasting.
Physical examination reveals jugular venous distention with prom­inent x and y descents and an increase (or failure to decrease) of cen­tral venous pressure with inspiration (i.e., Kussmaul sign). The arterial blood pressure is usually normal, and pulsus paradoxus is absent in most patients. Ascites and hepatomegaly can be prominent with advanced disease. On cardiovascular examination, the apical impulse may be decreased, and the cardiac sounds muffled. An early diastolic sound (i.e., pericardial knock) corresponding to the abrupt cessation of early ventricular diastolic filling is pathognomonic of pericardial constriction, but it is not always detected.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis of pericardial constriction may be challenging and fre­quently requires the use of multiple imaging modalities. The electro­cardiogram may display low QRS voltage, left atrial enlargement, and nonspecific T-wave changes. Atrial fibrillation occurs in one third of cases. The chest radiograph may reveal pleural effusions and pericar­dial calcification, which are best appreciated in the lateral projection.
Transthoracic echocardiography shows dilation of the inferior vena cava, abnormal interventricular septal motion, and pericardial thicken­ing. Doppler echocardiography demonstrates abnormal respirophasic variations of the pulmonary and hepatic venous flow and mitral valve inflow. CT and MRI can accurately measure pericardial thickness.
RV LV
Fig. 10.2 Pressure recordings from a patient with constrictive pericardi-
tis. Simultaneous right ventricular and left ventricular pressure tracings show equalization of diastolic pressure and dip-and-plateau morphology. LV, Left ventricle; RV, right ventricle.
Cardiac catheterization is essential in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction and differentiation from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). The right atrial pressure tracing shows prominent x and y descents with equalization of the end-diastolic atrial and ventricular pressures. The ventricular pressure tracings show a rapid early diastolic filling of the ventricles, with abrupt cessation in middle and end dias­tole due to the finite volume of the rigid pericardium (i.e., dip-and­plateau morphology or the square root sign) (Fig. 10.2). Enhanced ventricular interdependence demonstrated by simultaneous mea­surement of right and left ventricular pressures during respiration is a more specific finding of pericardial constriction.
Treatment
Medical therapy with sodium restriction and diuretics is of limited effi­cacy and is only appropriate in patients who are not surgical candidates due to comorbidities. Pericardiectomy is the only definitive treatment for constrictive pericarditis.
Prognosis
Pericardiectomy is associated with substantial operative risk that depends on the extent of cardiac involvement and existence of comor­bid conditions. Successful pericardial resection leads to resolution of the symptoms of constriction over a period of weeks to months. For patients who are not surgical candidates, the prognosis is poor.
126 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Effusive Constrictive Pericarditis
Effusive constrictive pericarditis is characterized by a pericardial effu­sion and a noncompliant or fibrotic parietal and visceral pericardium. Although it may result from any type of pericardial inflammation, it is usually seen after cardiac surgery or radiation injury. It likely rep­resents a transition stage between acute pericarditis with effusion and pericardial constriction. It shares the clinical and hemodynamic fea­tures of both conditions.
Typically, drainage of the effusion does not result in resolution of symptoms, and the central venous and right atrial pressures remain elevated. In the early stage of the disease, patients may respond to pro­longed treatment with NSAIDs. However, visceral and parietal pericar­diectomy is often required. For a deeper discussion of this topic, please see Chapter 68, “Pericardial Diseases,” in Goldman-Cecil Medicine, 26th Edition.
DISEASES OF THE MYOCARDIUM
Myocarditis
Definition and Epidemiology
Myocarditis is an inflammation of the myocardium caused by a variety of toxins, medications, and viruses. Viral myocarditis, which accounts for about 20% of cases of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), is com­monly caused by the enteroviruses, specifically Coxsackie group B serotypes and, less commonly, adenoviruses, parvovirus B19, hepatitis C virus, cytomegalovirus, and HIV.
Other causes include bacterial infections such as diphtheria, bru­cellosis, clostridial infections, legionnaires disease, and meningococcal, streptococcal, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Q fever, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, spirochetal infections (e.g., leptospirosis, Lyme disease), fungal infections, and parasitic infections (e.g., Trypanosoma cruzi [Chagas’ disease]) are also known causes of myocarditis.
Pathology
The pathogenesis of viral myocarditis is thought to begin with direct viral invasion of the myocardium and subsequent immunologic acti­vation. Normal cellular and antibody-mediated immune responses lead to viral clearing and myocardial healing. However, a few patients go on to develop DCM and heart failure due to an abnormal immune response that furthers myocardial damage. The exact mechanisms are unknown, but they involve cytokines, autoantibodies, and possibly other processes associated with persistent, low-level viral replication in myocytes, leading to myocyte atrophy, myocyte apoptosis, and adverse remodeling of the ventricles. In nonviral infections, the damage is attributed to the bacterial toxins or abnormal immune responses, and in parasitic infections, it is largely immune mediated.
Multiple chemicals and drugs can lead to myocardial inflammation by direct effect or as part of a hypersensitivity reaction. Some of the common causes include cocaine, chemotherapeutics (e.g., daunorubi­cin, doxorubicin), and antibiotics.
Giant cell myocarditis is a rare disorder of uncertain origin, but it can be rapidly fatal. It is usually associated with ventricular arrhyth­mias and progressive, severe heart failure. Multinucleated giant cells seen on myocardial biopsy are pathognomonic.
Clinical Presentation
The clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic ECG abnor­malities to cardiogenic shock. Patients report heart failure symptoms, including exercise intolerance, shortness of breath, fluid retention, and persistent fatigue. In the setting of viral myocarditis, they often report a viral prodrome, including fever, myalgia, fatigue, respiratory symptoms, or gastroenteritis that precedes the heart failure symptoms.
Patients are often tachycardic and hypotensive. They may have an elevated jugular venous pressure, S3 gallop, crackles, and peripheral edema. Myocarditis can masquerade as an acute coronary syndrome.
Diagnosis
Testing is performed to determine a possible infectious cause. Rising viral titers are often seen in cases of viral myocarditis. Serum cardiac enzymes (e.g., troponin, creatine kinase) are measured when myocar­ditis is suspected. Sinus tachycardia and nonspecific ST- and T-wave abnormalities are common ECG findings. When the pericardium is also involved by the inflammatory process, diffuse ST-segment eleva­tions typical for acute pericarditis are also seen. Ventricular ectopy is common, and atrioventricular conduction defects are seen in myocar­ditis associated with Lyme disease.
Echocardiography is recommended in the initial diagnostic evalua­tion to identify ventricular remodeling, including increasing chamber size and ventricular systolic dysfunction. Cardiac MRI is a promising technique to detect myocardial inflammation and injury based on small, observational clinical studies.
Transvenous endomyocardial biopsy should be performed only when there is rapid deterioration of the clinical condition. Histopathologic abnormalities such as infiltrating white cells (i.e., macrophages, lymphocytes, and eosinophils), evidence of myocardial damage, and interstitial fibrosis help to establish acute myocarditis, but the determination is subject to significant intraobserver and interob­server variability. Often the biopsy does not provide a conclusive diag­nosis. The endomyocardial biopsy is helpful in diagnosing giant cell myocarditis (i.e., multinucleated giant cells are seen) or hypersensitiv­ity myocarditis (i.e., eosinophilic infiltrate is seen). Polymerase chain reaction testing can detect specific viral genomes in the myocardium.
Treatment
Supportive care is the mainstay of treatment. A few patients with ful­minant or acute myocarditis require an intensive level of hemody­namic support and aggressive pharmacologic intervention similar to that for patients with advanced heart failure.
After initial hemodynamic stabilization, treatment should fol­low current American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommendations for the management of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Treatment includes β-adrener- gic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone receptor blockers, and diuretics.
No evidence-based guided therapy for viral myocarditis has been established. Clinical trials of various forms of antiviral or immuno­suppressive therapy (e.g., prednisone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, intravenous immunoglobulin, interferon immunoadsorption) have not resulted in conclusive evidence of benefit. Treatment of nonviral myocarditis is aimed at eradication of the specific infectious agent. For Chagas’ disease, treatment with antiprotozoal therapy, if initiated early in the course of infection, may be beneficial.
Hypersensitivity myocarditis and myocarditis associated with tox­ins respond to withdrawal of the offending agent. Immunosuppressive therapy has been effective in giant cell myocarditis.
Prognosis
The diverse clinical presentations and causes of myocarditis have lim­ited the understanding of its natural history. It is thought that one third of the patients fully recover, one third of the patients have some sequelae in the form of left ventricular systolic dysfunction but are sta­ble on medical therapy, and one third of patients progress to advanced heart failure. Patients who progress to chronic DCM have 5-year sur­vival rates of less than 50%.
CHAPTER 10 Pericardial and Myocardial Disease
TABLE 10.2 Cardiomyopathies
Disorder Description and Cause
Dilated cardiomyopathy Dilation and impaired systolic function of the left or both ventricles
Familial (genetic) Known or unknown genetic mutations Nonfamilial Viral myocarditis, nonviral infective myocarditis, idiopathic (immune) myocarditis
Toxins (drugs, alcohol) Pregnancy (peripartum cardiomyopathy) Nutritional (thiamine deficiency [beriberi], vitamin C deficiency [scurvy], selenium deficiency) Endocrine (diabetes mellitus, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, pheochromocytoma, acromegaly) Autoimmune (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis) Tachycardia induced
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Left and/or right ventricular hypertrophy, often asymmetrical (usually more prominent hypertrophy of the interventric-
ular septum)
Familial (genetic) Mutations of sarcoplasmic proteins (several hundred described)
Metabolic storage diseases of the myocyte
Restrictive cardiomyopathy Restrictive filling of the ventricles; ventricles are usually small, atria are markedly enlarged
Familial (genetic) Mutations of sarcomeric proteins
Familial amyloidosis (transthyretin, apolipoprotein) Hemochromatosis Desminopathy, pseudoxanthoma elasticum, glycogen storage diseases Unknown genetic mutations
Nonfamilial Amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, carcinoid, scleroderma
Endomyocardial fibrosis (hypereosinophilic syndrome, idiopathic, chromosomal defect, drugs) Radiation, metastatic cancer, anthracycline toxicity
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular Progressive fibrofatty replacement of the right and, to a lesser degree, left ventricular cardiomyopathy
Familial Unknown gene mutation
Mutations of intercalated disk protein, cardiac ryanodine receptor, transforming growth factor-β3
127
Unclassified Cardiomyopathies
Takotsubo (stress-induced) cardiomyopathy Transient dilation and dysfunction of the distal parts of the left ventricle (apical ballooning) in the setting of a stress-
ful situation; usually resolves within weeks
Left ventricular noncompaction Characterized by prominent left ventricular trabeculae and deep intertrabecular recesses; familial in most cases,
caused by arrest in the normal embryogenesis of the heart; apex and periapical regions of the left ventricle most affected; some patients remain asymptomatic, but others develop left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction
Cardiomyopathies associated with muscular
dystrophies and neuromuscular disorders
Ion channelopathies Disorders caused by mutations in genes encoding ionic channel proteins; not considered cardiomyopathies because
Cardiomyopathies
Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases in which the major structural abnormality is limited to the myocardium. The four main cardiomyopathic groups are dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Atrophic car­diomyopathy is a newer recognized group. Familial (genetic) and non­familial (acquired) forms of the diseases have been described.
Duchenne-Becker muscular dystrophy, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy, Friedreich’s ataxia,
neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis
they are not associated with typical structural changes of the heart but rather manifest with electrical dysfunction; some classifications include these disorders as cardiomyopathies: long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
agents, alcohol, cocaine, and radiation, along with deficiency of nutri­ents such as thiamine (causes beriberi), vitamin C (causes scurvy), car­nitine, selenium, phosphate, and calcium, can cause DCM. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a rare cause of DCM that can develop during the last month of pregnancy and up to 6 months after delivery. The pathogenesis of this peripartum cardiomyopathy is not completely understood, and it is a diagnosis of exclusion. Risk factors include older maternal age, being African American, and having multiple pregnancies. Prolonged periods
Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Definition and epidemiology. Cardiac enlargement and systolic
dysfunction in DCM result from a wide spectrum of genetic, inflammatory, toxic, and metabolic causes (Table 10.2), although most cases are idiopathic. Abnormal loading conditions such as hypertension, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease can lead to similar structural and functional changes; these conditions are not considered to be part of the DCM group and are discussed elsewhere.
Most cases are thought to result from acute viral myocarditis, a process
described earlier. Exposures to cardiac toxins such as chemotherapeutic
of supraventricular or ventricular tachycardia can lead to idiopathic DCM (i.e., tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy). The structural and func­tional changes usually reverse after the rapid heart rhythm is controlled.
Familial forms of DCM may be responsible for 20% to 30% of cases. Specific mutations involve genes that encode proteins of the sarcomere, cytoskeleton, nuclear membrane, and mitochondria; many mutations remain unknown. The mode of inheritance is typically auto­somal dominant, but it can be an X-linked or mitochondrial pattern.
Pathology. Marked enlargement of all four cardiac chambers is
typical of DCM, although the disease sometimes is limited to the left
128 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
or right chambers. The dilation is out of proportion to the ventricular thickness. Histology reveals evidence of myocyte degeneration with irregular hypertrophy and atrophy of myofibers with often extensive interstitial and perivascular fibrosis.
Clinical presentation. DCM usually manifests with symptoms of
heart failure such as fatigue, weakness, dyspnea, and edema. In some patients, the presenting episode is related to arrhythmia or an embolic event. On physical examination, signs of decreased cardiac output are often found, including cool extremities, narrow pulse pressure, and tachycardia. The cardiac examination reveals a laterally displaced apex. An S3 gallop is common, along with murmurs of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation. Pulmonary edema manifests as auscultatory crackles over the lung fields, and breath sounds may be diminished if there are pleural effusions. In some patients, the clinical features of right ventricular heart failure may predominate, with jugular venous distention hepatomegaly, ascites, and peripheral edema.
Diagnosis. Standard diagnostic procedures include a chest radio-
graph, an electrocardiogram, serum markers, and echocardiography. The radiograph shows cardiomegaly, pulmonary venous congestion, and pleural effusions. The electrocardiogram may reveal enlargement of the heart chambers along with other nonspecific ST- and T-wave abnormali­ties. Serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are elevated.
Echocardiography provides a comprehensive evaluation of ventric­ular size and function and valvular function, and it can show a ventric­ular thrombus. Similar information can be obtained with MRI.
A complete work-up should rule out ischemic, valvular, and hyper­tensive heart disease as the cause of myocardial dysfunction, and it should include evaluation for potentially reversible causes of DCM (e.g., alcohol, nutritional deficiencies). Myocardial biopsy may be con­sidered if the cause of DCM is in question. In patients with a strong family history, a referral for genetic testing should be considered.
Treatment. Potential reversible causes of DCM should be addressed
(e.g., alcohol cessation, correction of nutritional deficiencies, removal of cardiotoxic agents). Treatment should follow current ACC/AHA recommendations for the management of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and include β-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone receptor blockers, and diuretics.
Patients with idiopathic DCM who have persistent, moderate to severe symptoms of heart failure and a QRS duration longer than 120 milliseconds may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy with a biventricular pacemaker. Survival of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35% despite maximal medical management is improved with the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Patients with limiting heart failure symptoms despite use of the previously described therapies may be considered for heart trans­plantation or support with a left ventricular assist device.
Prognosis. The prognosis of patients with DCM depends on
the response to medical therapy. Some patients have a significant improvement in symptoms and cardiac function, but in others, the disease is progressive and associated with a high mortality rate.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Definition and epidemiology. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)
is a disease state characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy with nondilated ventricular chambers in the absence of an apparent cause for hypertrophy (e.g., hypertensive disease, aortic stenosis). This is a relatively common genetic disease (1 case in 500 people in the general population) with autosomal dominant inheritance, although spontaneous mutations have been described. More than 1400 mutations identified among at least eight genes encoding proteins of the cardiac sarcomere have been described, with mutations of the β-myosin heavy chain being the most common.
Pathology. The main pathophysiologic abnormalities seen in
HCM are left ventricular outflow obstruction, diastolic dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, and arrhythmias. Obstruction of left ventricular outflow occurs in roughly one half of the patients. During systole, the hypertrophied septum bulges into the left ventricular outflow tract, creating a gradient between the lower part of the left ventricular cavity and the left ventricular outflow. This causes high-velocity turbulent flow through the narrowed path, which results in a suction force (i.e., Venturi effect) that pulls the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve into the outflow tract. This worsens the obstruction and causes mitral regurgitation. Diastolic dysfunction from impaired relaxation properties of the abnormal myocardium causes marked elevation of left ventricular filling and pulmonary venous pressures, pulmonary congestion, and limitation in cardiac output. Patients with HCM are also predisposed to supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.
Clinical presentation. HCM is a heterogeneous cardiac disease
with a diverse course and clinical manifestations. Most patients probably do not suffer sequelae from this disease during their lifetimes. When the disease does result in complications, there are three relatively discrete but not mutually exclusive clinical manifestations: sudden cardiac death due to unpredictable ventricular tachyarrhythmia, most commonly in young asymptomatic patients (<35 years of age); heart failure characterized by exertional dyspnea (with or without chest pain) that may progress despite preserved systolic function and sinus rhythm; and atrial fibrillation that associates with various degrees of heart failure.
Heart failure symptoms result from the dynamic obstruction to left ventricular outflow and diastolic dysfunction. The most frequent symptom is dyspnea on exertion, followed by ischemic chest pain due to the increased oxygen demand by the hypertrophied ventricle and elevated wall tension that reduces blood flow to the subendocardium. Abnormalities of the structure of small myocardial arteries in HCM can contribute to myocardial ischemia. Presyncope or syncope can result from outflow tract obstruction and an inability to increase car­diac output during exertion or from arrhythmias that can be triggered by exertion. In some, sudden death caused by ventricular arrhythmia is the initial manifestation of the disease.
Physical examination findings include pulsus bisferiens, a brisk ini­tial upstroke in pulse followed by a midsystolic dip corresponding to the development of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, followed by another rise in late systole. Cardiac examination may reveal a force­ful and sustained apical impulse, an audible S4 gallop, and a harsh cre­scendo-decrescendo systolic murmur best heard along the left sternal border with radiation to the base of the heart.
Patients may also have an apical holosystolic murmur of mitral regurgitation. The intensity of the murmur of HCM varies with chang­ing degrees of obstruction. This can be observed with physiologic or pharmacologic maneuvers that change preload (i.e., left ventricular filling) or contractility. The intensity of the murmur increases with a Valsalva maneuver, with assuming a standing position, and after administration of nitroglycerin or inotropic drugs. The intensity of the murmur decreases with squatting, volume loading, and administration of β-blockers.
Diagnosis. Clinical diagnosis is made most commonly with echo-
cardiography and increasingly with cardiac MRI. The diagnosis is based on a maximal left ventricular wall thickness of 15 mm or more; a wall thickness of 13 to 14 mm is considered borderline. The diagnosis can be made in the setting of other compelling information (e.g., fam­ily history of HCM). Genetic testing is available to confirm the diagno­sis and to screen family members.
Treatment. The ACC/AHA hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guide-
line recommends tailored therapy based on the individual patient. For
A
B
C
Septal
myectomy
Increased
outflow
Reduced
outflow
Incision line through
hypertrophied
basal septum
Fig. 10.3 (A to C) Schematic diagrams of a septal myectomy. (From
Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr: Clinical practice: hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, N Engl J Med 350:1320-1327, 2004.)
Mitral
regurgitation
asymptomatic patients, the usefulness of β-blockade and verapamil may be considered. For patients symptomatic with dyspnea or angina, β-blockers and verapamil are recommended. If patients remain symp­tomatic, it is reasonable to add disopyramide to a β-blocker or ver­apamil.
Nonpharmacologic therapies should be considered in patients with considerable symptoms despite medical management. Septal reduction therapy is recommended only for patients with severe drug-refractory symptoms and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (Fig. 10.3). Use of ICD therapy for prevention of sudden death is guided by the perceived risk for ventricular arrhythmias in individual patients. Some of the characteristics that have been associated with this risk are prior cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia; great (>30 mm) ventricular wall thickness; syncope, especially if exertional or recur­rent; and a first-degree relative with sudden cardiac death. Certain genotypes appear to convey an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Patients with HCM should be excluded from most competitive sports and should avoid strenuous exercise.
Prognosis. The clinical course of HCM varies. Sudden cardiac
death is the leading cause of mortality. Heart failure symptoms may gradually progress and patients who are unresponsive to conventional therapy may require heart transplantation.
Restrictive Cardiomyopathies
Definition and epidemiology. RCM is an uncommon form
of cardiomyopathy characterized by impaired ventricular filling of nondilated ventricles. RCM can be genetic or acquired. Causes include infiltrative disorders (e.g., amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Gaucher’s disease, Hurler’s syndrome, fatty infiltration), storage diseases (e.g., hemochromatosis, Fabry’s disease, glycogen storage disease), other disorders (e.g., hypereosinophilic syndrome, carcinoid heart disease), drugs (e.g., serotonin, methysergide, ergotamine), and cancer treatment (e.g., irradiation, chemotherapy).
Pathology. In the purest form of the disease, the atria are
disproportionately dilated compared with the normal ventricular size, and the left ventricle has normal or near-normal systolic function
CHAPTER 10 Pericardial and Myocardial Disease
in the absence of hypertrophy. Histology is normally nondistinctive and can reveal normal findings or nonspecific degenerative changes, including myocyte hypertrophy, disarray, and degrees of interstitial fibrosis.
Clinical presentation. Patients often have symptoms and signs of
pulmonary and systemic congestion. The most common symptoms include dyspnea, palpitations, fatigue, weakness, and exercise intolerance due to poor cardiac output. As central venous pressure continues to increase in advanced cases, there may be hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, and anasarca. The chest radiograph shows atrial enlargement, pulmonary venous congestion, and pleural effusions.
Diagnosis. The diagnosis of RCM should be considered for patients
with predominantly right ventricular heart failure without evidence of cardiomegaly or systolic dysfunction. The correct diagnosis often is not made until months or years after symptom onset. Constrictive pericarditis can mimic RCM and establishing the correct diagnosis can be challenging. Distinctive features of the two disorders are described in Table 10.3.
Treatment. Treatment of RCM focuses on alleviating the symptoms
of heart failure. Diuretics are used for decongestion, but intravascular depletion may compromise ventricular filling and lead to reduced cardiac output and hypotension. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are poorly tolerated. In patients with conduction system disease such as advanced atrioventricular block, a permanent pacemaker may be indicated. Specific therapies for underlying disorders include chemotherapy in amyloidosis, phlebotomy and iron chelation therapy in hemochromatosis, and steroids in sarcoidosis and endomyocardial fibrosis.
Prognosis. The course of RCM depends on the pathology, and
treatment is often unsatisfactory. In the adult population, the prognosis usually is poor, with progressive deterioration and death due to low­output heart failure.
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Definition and epidemiology. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an autosomal dominant disease charac­terized by specific myocardial pathology. The estimated prevalence of ARVC is about 1 case in 2000 to 5000 people, and it has a male pre­dominance.
Pathology. The myocardium of the right ventricular free wall is
progressively replaced by fibrous and adipose tissue. Right ventricular function is abnormal, with regional akinesis or dyskinesis or global right ventricular dilation and dysfunction.
Clinical presentation. The disease typically manifests in young
adults as palpitations, dizziness or syncope, or sudden cardiac death. Symptoms of right ventricular failure are rare, despite evidence of right ventricular dysfunction on imaging studies.
Diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis of ARVC is suggested by integra-
tion of the information from the clinical presentation (e.g., arrhyth­mias), electrocardiogram, family history, and imaging studies. When available, histologic examination of the right ventricle confirms the diagnosis. The resting electrocardiogram may be normal, but common abnormalities include incomplete or complete right bundle branch block, the so-called epsilon waves that follow the QRS complex, and inverted T waves in the precordial leads. Right ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction can be seen with echocardiography and MRI. The latter modality can also show myocardial fat.
Treatment. Treatment consists of ICD therapy to prevent sudden
cardiac death, but the indications for implantation are not well defined. Antiarrhythmics and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia are used in patients with frequent arrhythmias, but they have not been shown to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death.
129
130 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
TABLE 10.3 Differentiation of Restrictive Cardiomyopathy From Constrictive Pericarditis
Type of Evaluation Restrictive Cardiomyopathy Constrictive Pericarditis
Physical examination Kussmaul sign present
Apical impulse may be prominent Regurgitant murmurs are common
Electrocardiography Low QRS voltage (especially in amyloidosis)
Pseudoinfarction pattern Bundle branch blocks AV conduction disturbances
Atrial fibrillation Chest radiography Calcification of the pericardium may be present Echocardiography Marked enlargement of the atria
Increased wall thickness (especially in amyloidosis)
Doppler echocardiography Restrictive mitral inflow (dominant E wave with short
deceleration time)
No significant variation (<10%) of transvalvular veloci-
ties with respiration
Reversal of forward flow in hepatic veins during
inspiration
Cardiac catheterization
Prominent atrial x and y descents (w sign)
Dip-and-plateau appearance of ventricular diastolic
pressure
Diastolic pressures increased but not equalized; LV
diastolic pressure higher than RV diastolic pressure
Endomyocardial biopsy May reveal specific cause of restrictive cardiomyop-
athy
Computed tomography, magnetic
resonance imaging
AV, Atrioventricular; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular.
Kussmaul sign may be present Apical impulse usually not palpable Pericardial knock may be present Low QRS voltage Repolarization abnormalities
Atria usually of normal size Normal wall thickness Pericardial thickening may be seen Restrictive mitral inflow (dominant E wave with short deceleration time) Increased velocity of RV filling and decreased velocity of LV filling with
inspiration; opposite with expiration; variation in velocity exceeds 15%
Reversal of forward flow in hepatic veins during expiration
Prominent atrial x and y descents (w sign) Dip-and-plateau appearance of ventricular diastolic pressure Increase and equalization of diastolic pressures Discordance of RV and LV peak systolic pressures (with inspiration, RV
systolic pressure increases and LV systolic pressure decreases) No specific findings on endomyocardial biopsy Pericardial biopsy may reveal abnormality Pericardial thickening
Patients with a probable or definite diagnosis of ARVC should be excluded from competitive sports.
Prognosis. The prognosis for these patients remains uncertain.
Unclassified Cardiomyopathies
Some cardiomyopathies that do not fit the current categories are described in Table 10.2.
For a deeper discussion of this topic, please see Chapter 54, “Diseases of the Myocardium and Endocardium,” in Goldman-Cecil Medicine, 26th Edition.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Elliott P, Andersson B, Arbustini E, et al: Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a
position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group
on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases, Eur Heart J 29:270–276, 2008. Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, et al: 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the
diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the
American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association
Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the
American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocar­diography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiog­raphy and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, J Am Coll Cardiol 58:e212–e260, 2011.
Kindermann I, Barth C, Mahfoud F, et al: Update on myocarditis, J Am Coll
Cardiol 59:779–792, 2012.
Maron BJ, Ackerman MJ, Nishimura RA, et al: Task Force 4: HCM and other
cardiomyopathies, mitral valve prolapse, myocarditis, and Marfan syn­drome, J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1340–1345, 2005.
Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, et al: Contemporary definitions and classifi-
cation of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Circulation 113:1807–1816, 2006.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al: 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the
management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardi­ology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Circulation 128:1810–1852, 2013.
11
Other Cardiac Topics
Jinnette Dawn Abbott, Sena Kilic
CARDIAC DISEASE IN PREGNANCY
Pregnancy is associated with dramatic changes in the cardiovascular system that may result in significant hemodynamic stress to the patient with underlying heart disease. During a normal pregnancy, plasma volume increases an average of 50%, beginning in the first trimes­ter and peaking between the 20th and 24th weeks of gestation. This change is accompanied by increases in stroke volume, heart rate, and, accordingly, cardiac output. In addition, a concomitant fall in systemic vascular resistance and mean arterial pressure occurs because of the effects of gestational hormones on the vasculature and the creation of a low-resistance circulation in the pregnant uterus and placenta. During labor, uterine contractions result in a transient increase of up to 500 mL of blood in the central circulation, resulting in further increases in stroke volume and cardiac output. After delivery, intravascular volume and cardiac output increase further as compression of the inferior vena cava by the gravid uterus is relieved and extravascular fluid is mobi­lized. The American Heart Association guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women identified pregnancy complications as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women. Hypertensive disor­ders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus are independently associated with increased 10-year cardiovascular risk.
Most women with cardiovascular disease can complete a pregnancy and delivery with proper follow-up. While cardiac disease may some­times be manifested for the first time in pregnancy, the symptoms and signs that may mimic cardiac disease often accompany the usual hemodynamic changes of pregnancy, including fatigue, reduced exer­cise tolerance, lower-extremity edema, distention of the neck veins, S3 gallop, and new systolic murmurs. Differentiating symptoms produced by cardiac disease from those attributable to a normal pregnancy can be difficult. Under such circumstances, echocardiography can be a safe and helpful noninvasive test to assess cardiac structure and function in the pregnant patient.
Certain cardiac conditions, including pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and connective tissue disorders including Marfan syndrome with a dilated aortic root, are associated with a high risk for cardiovascular complications and maternal death and require special consideration and counseling. The risk for cardiac complications during pregnancy depends on the maternal conditions as summarized in Table 11.1.
Specific Cardiac Conditions
Valvular Heart Disease
Due to the declining incidence of rheumatic heart disease in Western countries, valvular heart disease is infrequent in North America but remains prevalent in developing countries. Bicuspid aortic stenosis and mitral stenosis are the most common valvular diseases encountered during pregnancy. When aortic stenosis complicates pregnancy, it is
usually secondary to a congenital bicuspid aortic valve whereas mitral stenosis is the most common rheumatic valvular disease encountered during pregnancy. These valvular conditions tend to worsen during pregnancy due to the increased cardiac output and tachycardia. Congestive heart failure may develop as the pregnancy progresses and may be worsened by the onset of atrial fibrillation. Careful echocardio­graphic assessment is recommended, and the cornerstone of therapy for the symptomatic patient is β-blockade. In patients with symptoms refractory to medical therapy aortic balloon valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis or mitral balloon valvotomy for mitral stenosis can be consid­ered. Mitral and aortic regurgitation are usually well tolerated in preg­nancy provided the regurgitation is no more than moderate in severity, the woman is symptom-free before pregnancy, and the left ventricular function is normal.
Prosthetic valves. When selecting a prosthetic valve for women of
childbearing age, careful consideration has to be made with regards to the type of valve. Mechanical valves have greater longevity but routinely involve the use of warfarin, which is associated with a higher chance of fetal loss, placental hemorrhage, and prosthetic valve thrombosis. Tissue valves are less thrombogenic but tend to degenerate after an average of 10 years, necessitating a re-operation, which carries certain operative risks including mortality.
There is no universal consensus on the management of a pregnancy when the mother has a mechanical valve prosthesis. Prepregnancy coun­seling should include a detailed discussion of the risks to the patient. During pregnancy, increased platelet adhesiveness, increased concen­tration of clotting factors, and decreased fibrinolysis increase the risk of maternal valve thrombosis and thromboembolism. Unfractionated heparin, used subcutaneously or intravenously, is begun in the first trimester, as soon as pregnancy is diagnosed, to minimize fetal expo­sure to the teratogenic effects of warfarin. It is usually continued until week 13 or 14 of pregnancy, when fetal embryogenesis is complete, after which warfarin is resumed. Continuing heparin throughout preg­nancy has been shown to increase valve thrombosis risk to 33%. Low­molecular-weight heparin is an alternative to unfractionated heparin but its use remains controversial with no large prospective studies or evidence base to support its use and therapeutic monitoring.
Marfan Syndrome
Pregnant women with Marfan syndrome are at increased risk for aortic dissection and rupture, especially during the third trimester and the first postpartum month. Pregnancy is contraindicated in women with an aortic root diameter greater than 40 mm. Periodic echocardiographic surveillance every 6 to 8 weeks is recommended to monitor the mother’s aortic root size and treatment with β-adren­ergic blockers is recommended. Vaginal delivery is safe in patients with Marfan syndrome with an aortic diameter less than 40 mm. To
131
132 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
TABLE 11.1 Specific Maternal Cardiac Conditions and Risk for Cardiac Complications During
Pregnancy
Low Risk Intermediate Risk High Risk
Small left-to-right shunts Large left-to-right shunt New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms Repaired lesions without residual dysfunction Mitral valve prolapse without regurgitation Bicuspid aortic valve without stenosis Mild to moderate pulmonic stenosis Valvular regurgitation with normal ventricular
systolic function
Unrepaired or palliated cyanotic congenital heart disease Mechanical prosthetic valves Mitral or aortic valve stenosis Severe pulmonic stenosis Moderate to severe ventricular dysfunction Unrepaired coarctation of the aorta History of peripartum cardiomyopathy without residual
ventricular dysfunction
Severe pulmonary hypertension Marfan syndrome with aortic root dilation or major
valvular disease Severe aortic stenosis History of peripartum cardiomyopathy with residual
ventricular dysfunction
minimize pain and hemodynamic changes, epidural anesthesia and β-blockers or vasodilators should be used and forceps or vacuum use is recommended to shorten the second stage of labor. In patients with aortic diameter 40 mm or greater, delivery via elective C-section should be performed in a tertiary care center with cardiothoracic sur­gical expertise.
Congenital Heart Disease
Congenital heart disease is the predominant maternal cardiac disease in Western societies, and all patients with a history of congenital heart disease, whether or not they have had repair, should receive a detailed evaluation and appropriate counseling before conception. Patients with uncomplicated atrial or ventricular septal defects usually toler­ate pregnancy without complications unless they have concomitant pulmonary hypertension or atrial fibrillation. In patients with pulmo­nary hypertension, pregnancy is contraindicated. The added volume load of pregnancy may potentially precipitate left ventricular failure in patients with large intracardiac shunts.
In women with coarctation of the aorta, symptoms may first pres­ent during pregnancy, typically as systemic hypertension. Therapeutic options such as antihypertensive therapy, percutaneous stenting of the coarctation, and surgical intervention are available and most women will have a successful pregnancy with proper care.
Women with uncorrected tetralogy of Fallot should undergo pal­liative or definitive repair before conception to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Women with residual obstruction of the right ventric­ular outflow tract are at risk of worsening cyanosis and risk to both mother and fetus during pregnancy.
Heart Disease Arising During Pregnancy
Hypertension
Hypertension is the most common medical problem in pregnancy. It is defined as absolute blood pressure values greater than 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic. The major forms of hyperten­sion that may develop during pregnancy are essential or primary hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia superimposed on essential hypertension, and preeclampsia. Essential hyperten­sion is defined as hypertension, without a secondary cause, present before pregnancy or that is diagnosed before week 20 of gestation. Gestational hypertension is new hypertension without proteinuria that occurs after the 20th week of gestation and resolves within 2 weeks after delivery.
The mainstay of treatment of hypertension in pregnancy is anti­hypertensive medications, which are usually effective in treating
essential hypertension but not effective in preventing preeclampsia. Agents that have been safely used in pregnancy include hydrala­zine, α-methyldopa, clonidine, β-blockers, and labetalol. Diuretics should be used with caution because of the increased risk for pla­cental hypoperfusion. When preeclampsia develops, typically char­acterized by hypertension and proteinuria, bedrest, salt restriction, and close monitoring are initiated and magnesium sulfate can be administered to prevent eclamptic seizures and prolong pregnancy to facilitate fetal maturity. Blood pressure usually normalizes rap­idly with delivery.
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PCM) is a form of dilated cardiomyop­athy that may begin during the last trimester of pregnancy or within 5 months of delivery in a previously healthy woman. The true incidence of the disease is unknown, but estimates conclude that 1 in every 2500 to 4000 pregnancies is affected in the United States. Although the cause of PCM is unknown, myocardial injury is thought to be immunolog­ically mediated with inflammation playing a key role as evidenced by elevated serum markers of inflammation in many patients. Known risk factors include multiparity, black race, older maternal age and pre­eclampsia. Women usually exhibit symptoms and signs of congestive heart failure and cardiac imaging, usually with a transthoracic echocar­diogram, establishes the diagnosis.
Management is similar to that for congestive heart failure (see
Chapter 5) and usually includes the use of hydralazine, β-blockers,
digoxin, and diuretics for symptom management and preload reduc­tion. Diuretics may potentially reduce placental blood flow and must be used with caution. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been associated with increased fetal wastage in pregnant animals and aldosterone antagonists may have antiandrogenic effects on the fetus; therefore both classes of drugs should be avoided. Nitrates and ino­tropes may be necessary in severe cases and early fetal delivery may be necessary. Mechanical circulatory support may be necessary and cardiac transplantation may be considered in those cases refractory to mechanical circulatory support.
The outcome with PCM is variable. Left ventricular function nor­malizes in approximately 23% to 54% of women and death or progres­sive heart failure occurs in one third of affected women. The recurrence rate with subsequent pregnancies is 30%. In patients with full recovery of left ventricular function, mortality is negligible in subsequent preg­nancies; however, women with a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 25% at diagnosis or persistent left ventricular dysfunction should be counseled against a subsequent pregnancy.