Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2704_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
Fig. 4.10 Doppler tracing in a patient with aortic stenosis and regurgi-
tation. The velocity of systolic flow is related to the severity of obstruction.
LV
LA
Fig. 4.11 Color Doppler recording demonstrates severe mitral regurgi-
tation. The regurgitant jet seen in the left atrium is represented in blue
because blood flow is directed away from the transducer. The yellow
components are the mosaic pattern traditionally assigned to turbulent
or high-velocity flow. The arrow points to the hemisphere of blood
accelerating proximal to the regurgitant orifice (i.e., proximal isovelocity
surface area [PISA]). The size of the PISA can be used to help grade the
severity of regurgitation. Video 4.2 shows a dynamic echocardiographic
image in a patient with mitral regurgitation. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle. (Image courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.)
NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
The traditional radiotracer approach to assess ventricular function
is equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA), which uses
technetium-99m-labeled red blood cells. Serial ERNA can be performed at rest and during various levels of exercise of pharmacologic
perturbations to evaluate ventricular function and reserve. ERNA
has high reproducibility because there are no geometric assumptions
and there is much less operator dependence in the image acquisition.
Diastolic parameters can be readily assessed from the ventricular volume curve, which may be very helpful in the assessment of diastolic
dysfunction.
In radionuclide imaging of the heart, patients are injected with a
radioactive tracer, which distributes throughout the myocardium in
proportion to blood flow. Highly specialized cameras then capture the
33
distribution of the radioactive tracer, which allows for quantification
of left ventricular size, systolic function, and myocardial perfusion,
depending on the tracer used. The two main types of myocardial imaging used in cardiology, often in stress testing, are single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET).
In SPECT imaging, images of the heart are obtained for qualitative and quantitative analyses at rest and after stress (i.e., exercise or
pharmacologic vasodilation). Radionuclide tracers are injected prior
to rest images and just prior to the completion of stress. The most
frequently used radionuclide in SPECT imaging is technetium-99m
sestamibi. In the normal heart, the radioisotope is equally distributed throughout the myocardium at rest and stress. In patients with
ischemia, a localized area of decreased radiotracer uptake occurs after
stress but may partially or completely reverse during rest. A persistent
defect at peak exercise and rest (i.e., fixed defect) is consistent with
MI or scarring.
The use of new approaches such as combined low-level exercise and vasodilators, prone imaging, attenuation correction, and
computerized data analysis has improved the quality and reproducibility of the data from these studies. New camera technologies,
including those with solid state detector arrays, have demonstrated
improved image resolution and allow for reduced radiation exposure. Myocardial perfusion imaging may also be combined with
ECG-gated image acquisition (gated SPECT) to allow simultaneous
assessment of ventricular function and perfusion. Using this technique, regional wall motion can be evaluated to help assess potential
perfusion defects (Video 4.5).
PET has been widely used in oncology for many years but has
become increasingly popular in cardiology (Video 4.5). The commonly used tracers in cardiac PET imaging include rubidium-82 and
fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). When compared to SPECT,
PET has several technical advantages, including higher spatial and
temporal resolution, less radiation exposure, and the ability to quantify
absolute rather than relative coronary blood flow. These advantages
mean that PET is more sensitive and specific compared to SPECT in
diagnosing coronary disease, especially in the presence of multivessel
disease. Additionally, because PET gives an absolute rather than relative quantification of coronary blood flow, it can be used to assess
abnormal microvascular coronary circulation. Despite these clinical
advantages of PET over SPECT, the lack of availability of PET cameras
and radiotracers, as well as high costs and reimbursement issues, limits
the widespread adoption of PET.
In patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, FDG-PET is the
imaging modality of choice for diagnosis. FDG-PET can also be used
to detect myocardial viability by the use of perfusion and metabolic
tracers. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, metabolic activity
in a region of myocardium supplied by a severely stenotic coronary
artery suggests viable tissue that may regain more normal function
after revascularization (Fig. 4.14).
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is a noninvasive method
that is increasingly used for studying the heart and vasculature and has,
in fact, become the gold standard for measuring myocardial function,
volumes, and scarring. cMRI offers high-resolution dynamic and static
images of the heart that can be obtained in any plane, allowing quantification of left ventricular and valvular function. High-quality images
can be obtained in a larger proportion of subjects than is typically possible with echocardiography. Obesity, claustrophobia, inability to perform multiple breath-holds of 10 to 20 seconds, and arrhythmias are
causes of reduced image quality.

34 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A
Fig. 4.12 Echocardiogram enhanced with intravenous ultrasound contrast agent: apical four-chamber view
(A) and apical long-axis view (B). Highly echo-reflectant microbubbles make the left ventricular cavity appear
white, whereas the myocardium appears dark. Video 4.3 shows a dynamic image of echocardiographic contrast. (Image courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.)
LA
V
MV
LV
A
Fig. 4.13 Transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrates a vegetation (arrow) adherent to the ring of a
bileaflet, tilting-disk mitral valve prostheses. (A) In systole, the leaflets are closed with the vegetation seen
in the left atrium. (B) In diastole, the leaflets are open, with the vegetation prolapsing into the left ventricle.
Transesophageal echocardiography is the diagnostic test of choice for assessing prosthetic mitral valves
because the esophageal window allows unimpeded views of the atrial surface of the valve. Video 4.4 shows
a dynamic transesophageal echocardiographic image. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; MV, prosthetic mitral
valve disks; V, vegetation. (Courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt
Lake City, Utah.)
B
LA
V
B
cMRI also offers significant advantages over other imaging techniques for the characterization of tissues (e.g., muscle, fat, scar). cMRI
is useful in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease because stress-rest
myocardial perfusion (Fig. 4.15A) and areas of prior infarction (see
Fig. 4.15B to D) can be visualized with excellent spatial resolution.
Delayed or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the myocardium
HCM, specific patterns on MRI can help identify those patients at
highest risk of sudden cardiac death who would require defibrillators.
Similarly, MRI has also been used to help assess right ventricular morphology and function in patients with suspected arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy. The role of MRI in all aspects of cardiac
imaging continues to grow.
is characteristic of scar or permanently damaged tissue (Video 4.6).
The greater the transmural extent of LGE is in a given segment, the
lower the likelihood of improved function in that segment after revascularization. Because of the better spatial resolution, LGE can identify
localized or subendocardial scars that are not detectable with nuclear
imaging techniques.
MRI is excellent for evaluating a variety of cardiomyopathies (Fig.
4.16). In addition to morphology and function, characteristic patterns
of LGE have been reported in myocarditis, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In patients with
STRESS TESTING
Stress testing is an important noninvasive tool for evaluating patients
with known or suggested coronary artery disease (CAD). During exer-
cise, the increased demand for oxygen by the working skeletal mus-
cles is met by increases in heart rate and cardiac output. In patients
with significant CAD, the increase in myocardial oxygen demand
cannot be met by a proportional increase in coronary blood flow, and
myocardial ischemia may produce chest pain and characteristic ECG

CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
[13N]-ammonia
18
F]-deoxyglucose
[
13
[
N]-ammonia
18
F]-deoxyglucose
[
35
13
[
N]-ammonia
18
[
F]-deoxyglucose
Fig. 4.14 Resting myocardial perfusion (obtained with [13N]-ammonia) and metabolism (obtained with
[18F]-deoxyglucose) is seen in positron emission tomography images of a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The study demonstrates a perfusion-metabolic mismatch (reflecting hibernating myocardium) in which
large areas of hypoperfused (solid arrows) but metabolically viable (open arrows) myocardium involve the
anterior, septal, and inferior walls and the left ventricular apex. Video 4.5 shows a dynamic image obtained
with cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. (Courtesy Marcelo F. Di Carli, MD,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass.)
abnormalities. Combined with the hemodynamic response to exercise,
these changes can give useful diagnostic and prognostic information
for the patient with cardiac abnormalities. The most common indications for stress testing include establishing a diagnosis of CAD in
patients with chest pain, assessing prognosis and functional capacity
of patients with chronic stable angina or after an MI, evaluating exercise-induced arrhythmias, and assessing for ischemia after a revascularization procedure. Contraindications to stress testing include acute
coronary syndromes, poorly controlled hypertension (blood pressure
>220/110 mm Hg), severe aortic stenosis (valve area <1.0 cm2), and
decompensated congestive heart failure.
When to Stress Symptomatic Patients
Stress testing is most often used to evaluate symptoms concerning for
flow-limiting coronary artery disease and make the diagnosis of CAD.
The diagnostic accuracy of the stress test depends on several factors,
including the pretest probability of CAD in a given patient, the sensitivity and specificity of the test results in that patient population, the
adequacy of stress, and the criteria used to define a positive test. Stress
testing, when used to diagnose CAD, is one of the most useful and
cost-effective tests in symptomatic patients who have an intermediate
pretest probability of CAD, which is defined as a 10% to 90% risk.
This is because in patients with a low pretest probability, a positive test
does not significantly increase the post-test probability of CAD, and in
patients with a high pretest probability, a negative test does not significantly decrease the post-test probability of CAD. The pretest probability of CAD can be calculated through a variety of scores but is most
commonly done based on a patient’s description of angina (Table 4.4).
Angina has three important components:
1. Substernal chest pain or discomfort
2. The pain or discomfort is provoked by exertion or emotional stress
3. The pain or discomfort is relieved by rest and/or nitroglycerin.
Patients with all three components are said to have typical angina.
Those with any two of the three components have atypical angina, and
patients with nonanginal chest pain have only one or none of these
components.
Other factors that are not solely based on the description of chest
discomfort may be present that would increase a patient’s pretest

36 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A
C
Fig. 4.15 Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of chest pain or ischemic heart dis-
ease. (A) First-pass perfusion study during vasodilator stress shows a large septal perfusion defect (arrow).
The hypoperfused area appears dark compared with the myocardium with normal perfusion. (B) Example
of delayed enhancement imaging of an almost transmural infarction of the mid-inferolateral wall, including
the posterior papillary muscle. Infarcted myocardium appears white, whereas normal myocardium is black
(arrow). (C) Nontransmural (subendocardial) infarction of the septum and apex (arrow). (D) Patient with acute
myocarditis mimicking an acute coronary syndrome. Midmyocardial, rather than subendocardial, delayed
enhancement is characteristic of myocarditis (arrow).
probability of CAD. These include baseline ECG abnormalities suggestive of CAD and multiple CAD risk factors, such as diabetes, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or family history of premature CAD.
These should be taken into consideration on an individual basis and
may require an upward revision of pretest probability.
Stress Modalities
There are two essential components to any stress test: the type of
stress and the imaging modality. Stress can either be exercise-induced
or pharmacologic. Exercise level is deemed adequate if the patient
achieves 85% of his or her maximal predicted heart rate. Submaximal
stress tests can still be interpreted but may be limited in the ability
to rule out disease due to decreased sensitivity. Indications for terminating a stress test include fatigue, severe hypertension (>220 mm
Hg systolic), worsening angina during exercise, developing marked
or widespread ischemic ECG changes, significant arrhythmias, or
hypotension.
For patients who are able to exercise, the most commonly used
exercise protocols are the Bruce and modified Bruce protocols. These
protocols require a patient to walk on a treadmill as the speed and
incline of the belt increases with each advancing stage. Any patient
who can exercise should do so, as duration of exercise and provoked
symptoms provide valuable clinical and prognostic information for the
physician. The modified Bruce or similar protocols are ideal for older,
overweight, unstable, or debilitated patients. Additionally, in patients
B
D
unable to exercise on a treadmill, bicycle or arm ergometer testing may
also be used. In patients who cannot exercise or in those where exercise will interfere with image acquisition, pharmacologic agents may
be used.
The most commonly used pharmacologic stress agents are dobutamine, adenosine, and regadenoson, an adenosine derivative and
selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist. Dobutamine is a synthetic
sympathomimetic that stimulates alpha-1, beta-1, and beta-2 receptors, increasing inotropy and chronotropy, thereby increasing myocardial oxygen demand. It should be used cautiously in patients with a
history of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias as it can exacerbate both.
Regadenoson is an adenosine receptor agonist that induces coronary
vasodilation and is more commonly used in radionuclide myocardial
perfusion imaging. Its use is contraindicated in patients with asthma
or COPD and active wheezing as well as patients with significant bradyarrhythmias without a pacemaker. It should be used with caution in
patients with a history of seizures as it can lower the seizure threshold.
STRESS IMAGING
Exercise or pharmacologic stress testing must be combined with imaging modalities to assess for characteristic changes seen in flow-limiting
coronary artery disease. The most basic form of imaging is an ECG,
which can be combined with adjunctive echocardiography or radionuclide imaging to increase the diagnostic accuracy of the testing.

CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
37
A
C
Fig. 4.16 Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used in the evaluation of cardiomyopathies. (A)
Severe left ventricular hypertrophy in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Diastolic frame shows
open mitral valve (arrow). (B) Systolic frame shows systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve with flow
disturbance in the left ventricular outflow tract (arrow). (C) Patient has left ventricular noncompaction as evidenced by deep trabeculations in the left ventricular apex (arrow). (D) Patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy
has transmural apical infarction and adjacent mural thrombus (arrow). Video 4.6 shows a dynamic cardiac
MRI image. (Images courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake
City, Utah.)
B
D
TABLE 4.4 Diamond and Forrester Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease by Age, Sex,
and Symptoms
Age (Years) Sex Typical/Definite Angina Pectoris Atypical/Probable Angina Pectoris Nonanginal Chest Pain
≤39 Men Intermediate Intermediate Low
Women Intermediate Very low Very low
40-49 Men High Intermediate Intermediate
Women Intermediate Low Very low
50-59 Men High Intermediate Intermediate
Women Intermediate Intermediate Low
≥60 Men High Intermediate Intermediate
Women High Intermediate Intermediate
High: >90% pretest probability. Intermediate: between 10% and 90% pretest probability. Low: between 5% and 10% pretest probability. Very low:
<5% pretest probability.
From Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al: ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63:380-406, 2014.

38 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Stress Electrocardiography
The normal physiologic response to exercise is an increase in heart
rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The ECG maintains
normal T-wave polarity, and the ST segment remains unchanged or,
if depressed, has a rapid upstroke back to baseline. An ischemic ECG
response to exercise is defined as 1.5 mm of upsloping ST-segment
depression measured 0.08 second past the J point, at least 1 mm of horizontal ST depression, or 1 mm of downsloping ST-segment depression measured at the J point. Given the large amount of artifact on
the ECG that may occur with exercise, these changes must be seen in
at least three consecutive depolarizations. Other findings that suggest
more extensive CAD include early onset of ST depression (6 minutes);
marked, downsloping ST depression (>2 mm), especially if present
in more than five leads; ST changes persisting into recovery for more
than 5 minutes; and failure to increase systolic blood pressure to 120
mm Hg or more or a sustained decrease of 10 mm Hg or more below
baseline.
The ECG is not diagnostically useful in the setting of left ventricular hypertrophy, LBBB, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, or chronic
digoxin therapy. In these instances, further imaging modalities such as
echocardiography, nuclear imaging, or positron-emission tomography
(PET) are needed to help diagnose ischemia.
Stress Echocardiography
Two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography
are often used in conjunction with exercise or pharmacologic stress
testing. The pharmacologic agent typically used is dobutamine. A baseline echocardiogram is performed at rest and during stress. Changes in
wall motion are indicative of ischemia and coronary artery disease. In
areas of the left ventricle that have wall motion abnormalities at rest,
improvement of these wall motion abnormalities with exercise or lowdose dobutamine is indicative of viability.
Relative to myocardial perfusion imaging, the sensitivity of stress
echocardiography is slightly lower whereas the specificity is slightly
higher. A poor baseline echocardiogram due to limited acoustic windows will limit stress test results. The estimated cost-effectiveness of
stress echocardiography is significantly better than nuclear perfusion
imaging because of the overall lower cost.
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (See Also Nuclear
Cardiology Section)
Stress testing, using myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT to
compare relative coronary blood flow at stress and at rest, helps to
identify areas of perfusion mismatch, indicative of ischemia. Like with
other stress modalities, exercise or pharmacologic stress can be used.
Commonly used pharmacologic agents include dipyridamole, adenosine, and regadenoson, which are all coronary vasodilators. It is important to note that patients with LBBB have to undergo pharmacologic
stress when receiving myocardial perfusion imaging, even if they are
able to exercise, as the abnormal septal motion caused by the LBBB can
lead to a false perfusion defect during exercise.
Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Though either exercise or pharmacologic stress may be combined with
cMRI, the contemporary use of stress cMRI usually refers to stress perfusion cMRI with gadolinium contrast that is performed with regadenoson. This technique allows for evaluation of wall motion, perfusion,
scar, viability, and microvascular dysfunction, as well as chamber
quantification and function, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation
of the myocardium and myocardial function. Changes in late gadolinium enhancement between rest and stress has performance characteristics for diagnosing CAD that are at least as good and likely superior to
those of conventional stress tests using nuclear myocardial perfusion
imaging or echocardiography, and on par with PET imaging.
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HEART
Newer applications of computed tomography (CT) have greatly
advanced our ability to diagnose cardiovascular disease noninvasively. The development of fast gantry rotation speeds and the addition of multiple rows of detectors (i.e., multidetector CT) have allowed
unprecedented visualization of the great vessels, heart, and coronary
arteries with images acquired during a single breath-hold lasting 10
to 15 seconds. CT is used to diagnose aortic aneurysm, acute aortic
dissection, and pulmonary embolism, and it is useful for defining congenital abnormalities and detecting pericardial thickening or calcification associated with constrictive pericarditis. ECG-gated dynamic
CT images have been used to quantify ventricular size, function, and
regional wall motion (Video 4.7), and in contrast to echocardiography,
CT is not limited by lung disease or chest wall deformity. However,
obesity and implanted prosthetic materials (i.e., mechanical valves or
pacing wires) may affect image quality.
The greatest excitement and controversy about cardiac CT relates
to the evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis. Electron beam and multidetector CT scans can be used to quickly and reliably visualize and
quantitate the extent of coronary artery calcification (Fig. 4.17). The
presence of coronary calcium is pathognomonic of atherosclerosis, and
the extent of coronary calcium (usually reported as an Agatston score)
is a powerful marker of future cardiovascular events. The coronary calcium score adds substantial, independent improvement in risk prediction to the commonly employed clinical risk scores (e.g., Framingham
risk score). Moreover, the calcium score is a good marker of the overall
atherosclerotic burden. Indications for coronary calcium scoring continue to grow, especially in refining risk predictions in asymptomatic
patients at intermediate risk for arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography
(CCTA) has improved dramatically in recent years. CCTA has a sensitivity of more than 95% in diagnosing significant coronary artery
obstruction. Unlike myocardial perfusion imaging, CCTA is an anatomic test, and thus does not give information on perfusion or blood
flow across a lesion. Thus, in patients with known coronary disease,
CCTA cannot easily differentiate between ischemic and nonischemic
chest pain. New technology is being developed to noninvasively determine the hemodynamic significance of a lesion through CCTA, similar
to fractional flow reserve in coronary catheterization, though this technology still needs to be rigorously tested and standardized. Evaluation
of coronary arteries with CCTA can be significantly limited in patients
with extensive coronary calcifications, cardiac devices, or prior stents
due to technical limitations.
Concerns that limit the widespread use of cardiac CT most frequently cite the risks of radiation and contrast exposure and the lack of
prospective studies showing improvement in outcome with this testing
modality. In early studies, the calculated radiation exposure of CCTA
was about double that of a diagnostic invasive coronary angiogram,
although with prospective ECG-gating, most studies are now equal to
or less than a diagnostic angiogram. Contrast use is often higher in a
CCTA than in a diagnostic invasive coronary angiogram. The role of
CCTA in routine clinical practice continues to evolve.
CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
Cardiac catheterization is an invasive technique in which fluid-filled
catheters are introduced percutaneously into the arterial and/or venous
circulation. This method allows direct measurement of intracardiac

CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
39
A
C
B
D
Fig. 4.17 Computed tomography coronary angiography compared with conventional radiographic contrast
angiography. (A and B) Volume-rendering technique demonstrates stenosis of the right coronary artery and
normal left coronary artery. (C and D) Maximal intensity projection of the same arteries demonstrates severe
noncalcified plaque in the right coronary artery with superficial calcified plaque. (E and F) Invasive angiography of the same arteries. (From Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive
coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography, J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557, 2005.)
pressures and oxygen saturation and, with the injection of a contrast
agent, visualization of the coronary arteries, cardiac chambers, and
great vessels. Cardiac catheterization is indicated when a clinically suggested cardiac abnormality requires confirmation and its anatomic and
physiologic importance needs to be quantified. Coronary angiography
for the diagnosis of CAD is the most common indication for this test.
Compared with catheterization, noninvasive testing with echocardiography is safer, often cheaper, and equally effective in the evaluation of most valvular and hemodynamic conditions. Most often,
catheterization precedes some type of beneficial intervention, such as
FE
coronary artery angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, or valvular surgery. Although cardiac catheterization is usually safe (0.1% to 0.2%
overall mortality rate), procedure-related complications such as vascular injury, renal failure, stroke, and MI can occur.
Left Heart Catheterization and Coronary Angiography
Left heart catheterization and coronary angiography first requires the
introduction of wires and fluid-filled catheters into the arterial system
of the body. In the past, femoral arterial access was the default route,
but now, radial arterial access has become increasingly more common.

Cardia
Oxygen consumption
oxygen content)
mm Hg
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
40 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
200
100
20
Fig. 4.18 Electrocardiographic tracing and left ventricular (LV) and aortic
(AO) pressure curves in a patient with aortic stenosis. A pressure gradient occurs across the aortic valve during systole.
It has replaced femoral arterial access as the default access site in most
centers. Radial arterial access is associated with less bleeding, fewer vascular complications, and increased patient comfort and early mobility after the procedure when compared with femoral arterial access.
However, it is also associated with higher radiation exposure and
increased procedural time.
After access is obtained, wires and fluid-filled catheters are advanced
to the aortic root and through the aortic valve into the left ventricle
under fluoroscopic guidance. Here, left ventricular size, wall motion,
and ejection fraction can be accurately assessed by injecting contrast
into the left ventricle (i.e., left ventriculography). Aortic and mitral
valve insufficiency can be qualitatively assessed during angiography
by observing the reflux of contrast medium into the left ventricle and
left atrium, respectively. Left ventricular pressures can be directly measured and recorded, and the catheter can slowly be pulled back across
the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic valve to directly
assess for any pressure differential that would be consistent with aortic
stenosis or LVOT obstruction (Fig. 4.18).
The coronary anatomy can be defined by injecting contrast
medium into the coronary tree. Atherosclerotic lesions appear as narrowing of the internal diameter (lumen) of the vessel. A hemodynamically important stenosis is defined as 70% or more narrowing of the
luminal diameter. However, the hemodynamic significance of a lesion
can be underestimated by coronary angiography, particularly when
the atherosclerotic plaque is eccentric or elongated. Intravascular
ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, or miniaturized pressure sensors can be used during invasive procedures to help evaluate
the severity or estimate the physiologic significance of intermediate
lesions.
LV
AO
Right Heart Catheterization
Right heart catheterization is a useful invasive technique that can be
performed at bedside or with fluoroscopic guidance. The pulmonary
artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter, which is a balloon-tipped catheter used
for right heart catheterization, can be left in a patient for a prolonged
period of time in a critical care setting to provide continuous information on cardiovascular hemodynamics and filling pressures. Right
heart catheterization can be helpful when used in appropriate situations, such as when differentiating noncardiogenic from cardiogenic
pulmonary edema, managing mixed shock, managing cardiogenic
shock, and classifying and treating pulmonary hypertension.
Right heart catheterization is performed by first accessing the venous
system. Common sites of entry for right heart catheterization include
the internal jugular vein (usually the right), the right brachial vein, or the
femoral veins. The procedure can be performed at the bedside or under
fluoroscopic guidance with a balloon-tipped (Swan-Ganz) catheter. The
catheter is advanced from the vein to the right atrium, right ventricle,
and pulmonary artery, where pressures are measured and recorded. The
catheter can then be advanced further until it wedges in the distal pulmonary artery. The transmitted pressure measured in this location originates from the pulmonary venous system and is known as the pulmonary
capillary wedge pressure. In the absence of pulmonary venous disease, the
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reflects left atrial pressure, and if no
significant mitral valve pathologic condition exists, it reflects left ventricular diastolic pressure. A more direct method of obtaining left ventricular filling pressures is through left heart catheterization, as described in
the previous section. With these two methods of obtaining intracardiac
pressures, each chamber of the heart can be directly assessed and the
gradients across any of the valves determined (Fig. 4.19).
Cardiac output can be determined by one of two widely accepted
methods: the Fick oxygen method and the indicator dilution technique. The basis of the Fick method is that total uptake or release of
a substance by an organ is equal to the product of blood flow to that
organ and the concentration difference of that substance between the
arterial and venous circulation of that organ. If this method is applied
to the lungs, the substance released into the blood is oxygen; if no
intrapulmonary shunts exist, pulmonary blood flow is equal to systemic blood flow or cardiac output. The cardiac output can be determined by the following equation:
c output =
(Arterial oxygen content _ Venous
Oxygen consumption is measured in milliliters per minute by collecting the patient’s expired air over a known period while simultaneously
measuring oxygen saturation in a sample of arterial and mixed venous
blood (i.e., arterial and venous oxygen content, respectively, measured
in milliliters per liter). The cardiac output is expressed in liters per
minute and then corrected for body surface area (i.e., cardiac index).
The normal range of cardiac index is 2.6 to 4.2 L/min/m2. Cardiac output can also be determined by the indicator dilution technique, which
most commonly uses cold saline as the indicator. With this method,
cold saline is injected into the blood, and the resulting temperature
change downstream is monitored. This action generates a curve in
which temperature change is plotted over time, and the area under the
curve represents cardiac output.
Detection and localization of intracardiac shunts can be performed
by sequential measurement of oxygen saturation in the venous system,
right side of the heart, and two main pulmonary arteries. In patients
with left-to-right shunt flow, an increase in oxygen step-up (i.e., saturation increase from one chamber to the successive chamber) occurs
as arterial blood mixes with venous blood. By using the Fick method
for calculating blood flow in the pulmonary and systemic systems, the
shunt ratio can be calculated. Noninvasive approaches have largely
supplanted catheterization laboratory assessment of shunts.
In the past, the Swan-Ganz catheter was routinely used in most
patients with shock; however, randomized trials have since been
published suggesting no improvement in outcomes in critically ill
patients in whom pulmonary artery catheterization was performed.

CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
A
ECG
B
Radial artery
pressure
(mm Hg)
100
0
C
Pulmonary
capillary
pressure
(mm Hg)
40
wedge
20
41
0
D
Right atrial
pressure
(mm Hg)
Fig. 4.19 Electrocardiographic (ECG) (A) and Swan-Ganz flotation catheter (C) recordings are shown. The
recordings of a catheter in the radial artery and Swan-Ganz floating catheter in the right atrium are shown in
B and D, respectively. The left portion of tracing C was obtained with the balloon inflated, yielding the pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. The right portion of tracing C was recorded with the balloon deflated, depicting
the pulmonary arterial pressure. In this patient, the pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (i.e., left ventricular
filling pressure) is normal, and the pulmonary artery pressure is elevated because of lung disease.
Certainly, improvements in noninvasive imaging techniques have
made the Swan-Ganz catheter much less important in diagnosing cardiac conditions such as cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis,
right ventricular infarction, and ventricular septal defect. This led to
a decline in the routine use of Swan-Ganz catheters in intensive care
units. However, the use of these catheters has resurged, likely due to
the increased use of advanced heart failure therapies and mechanical
support, where continuous hemodynamic monitoring is essential for
optimal therapy titration (Table 4.5).
20
10
0
ENDOMYOCARDIAL BIOPSY
Biopsy of the right ventricular endomyocardium can be performed.
With this technique, a bioptome is introduced into the venous system through the right internal jugular vein and guided into the right
ventricle by fluoroscopy. Small samples of the endocardium are taken
for histologic evaluation. The primary indication for endomyocardial biopsy is the diagnosis of rejection after cardiac transplantation
and documentation of cardiac amyloidosis; however, endomyocardial biopsy may have some use in diagnosing specific etiologic agents
responsible for myocarditis.
NONINVASIVE VASCULAR TESTING
Assessment for the presence and severity of peripheral vascular disease is an important component of the cardiovascular evaluation.
Comparison of the systolic blood pressure in the upper and lower
extremities is one of the simplest tests to detect hemodynamically
important arterial disease. Normally, the systolic pressure in the thigh
is similar to that in the brachial artery. An ankle-to-brachial pressure

42 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
TABLE 4.5 Differential Diagnosis Using a Bedside Balloon Flow-Directed (Swan-Ganz) Catheter
Thermodilution Cardiac
Disease State
Cardiogenic shock ↓ ↑ nl or ↓ ↑ Systemic vascular resistance
Septic shock (early) ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ Systemic vascular resistance; myocardial
Volume overload nl or ↑ ↑ ↑
Volume depletion ↓ ↓ ↓
Noncardiac pulmonary edema nl nl nl
Pulmonary heart disease nl or ↑ nl ↑ ↑ PA pressure
RV infarction ↓ ↓ or nl ↑
Pericardial tamponade ↓ nl or ↑ ↑ Equalization of diastolic RA, RV, PA, and
Papillary muscle rupture ↓ ↑ nl or ↑
Ventricular septal rupture ↑ ↑ nl or ↑ Artifact caused by RA → PA sampling higher
nl, Normal; PA, pulmonary artery; PCW, pulmonary capillary wedge; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; ↑, increased; ↓, decreased.
Output PCW Pressure RA Pressure Comments
dysfunction can occur late
PCW pressure
Large v waves in PCW tracing
in PA than RA; may have large v waves in
PCW tracing
ratio (i.e., ankle-brachial index) of less than or equal to 0.9 is abnormal. Patients with claudication usually have an index ranging from 0.5
to 0.8, and patients with rest pain have an index less than 0.5. In some
patients, measuring the ankle-brachial index after treadmill exercise
may help to determine the importance of borderline lesions. During
normal exercise, blood flow increases to the upper and lower extremities with corresponding decreases in peripheral vascular resistance,
whereas the overall ankle-brachial index remains unchanged. In the
presence of a hemodynamically significant lesion, the reduced flow
across the lesions causes a consequent pressure decrease, and as a
result, the ankle-brachial index decreases in proportion to the severity
of the stenosis. Some patients, especially those with diabetes or chronic
kidney disease, may have falsely elevated ankle-brachial indices due
to vascular stiffness (>1.3). In these patients, a toe-brachial index can
be measured. In general, a toe-brachial index less than 0.6 indicates
abnormal perfusion in the foot, though the site of the occlusive disease
would have to be identified with further studies.
After significant vascular disease in the extremities has been identified, plethysmography can be used to determine the location and
severity of the disease. With this method, a pneumatic cuff is positioned on the leg or thigh, and when inflated, temporarily obstructs
venous return. Volume changes in the limb segment below the cuff are
converted to a pressure waveform, which can be analyzed. The degree
of amplitude reduction in the pressure waveform corresponds to the
severity of arterial disease at that level.
Doppler ultrasound uses reflected sound waves to identify and
localize stenotic lesions in the peripheral arteries. This test is particularly useful for patients with severely calcified arteries, for whom
pneumatic compression is not possible and ankle-brachial indices are
inaccurate. In combination with real-time imaging (i.e., duplex imaging), this technique is useful in assessing specific arterial segments and
bypass grafts for stenotic or occlusive lesions.
Magnetic resonance angiography and CTA allow high-quality and
comprehensive imaging of the entire peripheral arterial circulation in
a single study. The three-dimensional nature of these studies and the
ability to perform extensive postprocessing views, including cross-sectional views, of all vessels, even those that are very tortuous, are attractive features of these modalities.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Fihn SD, Blakenship JC, Alexander KP, et al: 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/
SCAI/STS Focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, Circulation 130:17491767, 2014.
Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al: Recommendations for the standard-
ization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American
Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee,
Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology
Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology, J Am Coll Cardiol
49:1109-1127, 2007.
Otto CM: Textbook of clinical echocardiography, ed 6, Chapter 2, Normal
anatomy and flow patterns on transthoracic echocardiography, Philadelphia, Elsevier, pp. 33-65, 578p.
Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock, WF, et al: 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/
ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS Appropriate
utilization of cardiovascular imaging in emergency department patients with
chest pain: a joint document of the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology
Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, J Am Coll Cardiol 13:e1-e29, 2016.
St. John Sutton M, Morrison AR, Sinusas AJ, Ferrari VA: Heart failure: a com-
panion to braunwald’s heart disease, ed 4, Mann DL, Felker GM, editors:
Philadelphia, Elsevier Inc, 2019, Chapter 32, Cardiac imaging in heart
failure, p.418-448. 739p.
Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al: ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/
SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality appropriate use criteria for
the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease, J Am
Coll Cardiol 63:380-406, 2014.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
