Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2704_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
35 Мб
Скачать
CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
Fig. 4.10 Doppler tracing in a patient with aortic stenosis and regurgi-
tation. The velocity of systolic flow is related to the severity of obstruc­tion.
LV
LA
Fig. 4.11 Color Doppler recording demonstrates severe mitral regurgi-
tation. The regurgitant jet seen in the left atrium is represented in blue because blood flow is directed away from the transducer. The yellow components are the mosaic pattern traditionally assigned to turbulent or high-velocity flow. The arrow points to the hemisphere of blood accelerating proximal to the regurgitant orifice (i.e., proximal isovelocity surface area [PISA]). The size of the PISA can be used to help grade the severity of regurgitation. Video 4.2 shows a dynamic echocardiographic image in a patient with mitral regurgitation. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ven­tricle. (Image courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.)
NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY
The traditional radiotracer approach to assess ventricular function is equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA), which uses technetium-99m-labeled red blood cells. Serial ERNA can be per­formed at rest and during various levels of exercise of pharmacologic perturbations to evaluate ventricular function and reserve. ERNA has high reproducibility because there are no geometric assumptions and there is much less operator dependence in the image acquisition. Diastolic parameters can be readily assessed from the ventricular vol­ume curve, which may be very helpful in the assessment of diastolic dysfunction.
In radionuclide imaging of the heart, patients are injected with a radioactive tracer, which distributes throughout the myocardium in proportion to blood flow. Highly specialized cameras then capture the
33
distribution of the radioactive tracer, which allows for quantification of left ventricular size, systolic function, and myocardial perfusion, depending on the tracer used. The two main types of myocardial imag­ing used in cardiology, often in stress testing, are single-photon emis­sion tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET).
In SPECT imaging, images of the heart are obtained for qualita­tive and quantitative analyses at rest and after stress (i.e., exercise or pharmacologic vasodilation). Radionuclide tracers are injected prior to rest images and just prior to the completion of stress. The most frequently used radionuclide in SPECT imaging is technetium-99m sestamibi. In the normal heart, the radioisotope is equally distrib­uted throughout the myocardium at rest and stress. In patients with ischemia, a localized area of decreased radiotracer uptake occurs after stress but may partially or completely reverse during rest. A persistent defect at peak exercise and rest (i.e., fixed defect) is consistent with MI or scarring.
The use of new approaches such as combined low-level exer­cise and vasodilators, prone imaging, attenuation correction, and computerized data analysis has improved the quality and repro­ducibility of the data from these studies. New camera technologies, including those with solid state detector arrays, have demonstrated improved image resolution and allow for reduced radiation expo­sure. Myocardial perfusion imaging may also be combined with ECG-gated image acquisition (gated SPECT) to allow simultaneous assessment of ventricular function and perfusion. Using this tech­nique, regional wall motion can be evaluated to help assess potential perfusion defects (Video 4.5).
PET has been widely used in oncology for many years but has become increasingly popular in cardiology (Video 4.5). The com­monly used tracers in cardiac PET imaging include rubidium-82 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). When compared to SPECT, PET has several technical advantages, including higher spatial and temporal resolution, less radiation exposure, and the ability to quantify absolute rather than relative coronary blood flow. These advantages mean that PET is more sensitive and specific compared to SPECT in diagnosing coronary disease, especially in the presence of multivessel disease. Additionally, because PET gives an absolute rather than rel­ative quantification of coronary blood flow, it can be used to assess abnormal microvascular coronary circulation. Despite these clinical advantages of PET over SPECT, the lack of availability of PET cameras and radiotracers, as well as high costs and reimbursement issues, limits the widespread adoption of PET.
In patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, FDG-PET is the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis. FDG-PET can also be used to detect myocardial viability by the use of perfusion and metabolic tracers. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, metabolic activity in a region of myocardium supplied by a severely stenotic coronary artery suggests viable tissue that may regain more normal function after revascularization (Fig. 4.14).
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is a noninvasive method that is increasingly used for studying the heart and vasculature and has, in fact, become the gold standard for measuring myocardial function, volumes, and scarring. cMRI offers high-resolution dynamic and static images of the heart that can be obtained in any plane, allowing quanti­fication of left ventricular and valvular function. High-quality images can be obtained in a larger proportion of subjects than is typically pos­sible with echocardiography. Obesity, claustrophobia, inability to per­form multiple breath-holds of 10 to 20 seconds, and arrhythmias are causes of reduced image quality.
34 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A
Fig. 4.12 Echocardiogram enhanced with intravenous ultrasound contrast agent: apical four-chamber view
(A) and apical long-axis view (B). Highly echo-reflectant microbubbles make the left ventricular cavity appear white, whereas the myocardium appears dark. Video 4.3 shows a dynamic image of echocardiographic con­trast. (Image courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.)
LA
V
MV
LV
A
Fig. 4.13 Transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrates a vegetation (arrow) adherent to the ring of a
bileaflet, tilting-disk mitral valve prostheses. (A) In systole, the leaflets are closed with the vegetation seen in the left atrium. (B) In diastole, the leaflets are open, with the vegetation prolapsing into the left ventricle. Transesophageal echocardiography is the diagnostic test of choice for assessing prosthetic mitral valves because the esophageal window allows unimpeded views of the atrial surface of the valve. Video 4.4 shows a dynamic transesophageal echocardiographic image. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; MV, prosthetic mitral valve disks; V, vegetation. (Courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.)
B
LA
V
B
cMRI also offers significant advantages over other imaging tech­niques for the characterization of tissues (e.g., muscle, fat, scar). cMRI is useful in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease because stress-rest myocardial perfusion (Fig. 4.15A) and areas of prior infarction (see
Fig. 4.15B to D) can be visualized with excellent spatial resolution.
Delayed or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the myocardium
HCM, specific patterns on MRI can help identify those patients at highest risk of sudden cardiac death who would require defibrillators. Similarly, MRI has also been used to help assess right ventricular mor­phology and function in patients with suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. The role of MRI in all aspects of cardiac
imaging continues to grow. is characteristic of scar or permanently damaged tissue (Video 4.6). The greater the transmural extent of LGE is in a given segment, the lower the likelihood of improved function in that segment after revas­cularization. Because of the better spatial resolution, LGE can identify localized or subendocardial scars that are not detectable with nuclear imaging techniques.
MRI is excellent for evaluating a variety of cardiomyopathies (Fig.
4.16). In addition to morphology and function, characteristic patterns
of LGE have been reported in myocarditis, cardiac amyloidosis, sar­coidosis, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In patients with
STRESS TESTING
Stress testing is an important noninvasive tool for evaluating patients
with known or suggested coronary artery disease (CAD). During exer-
cise, the increased demand for oxygen by the working skeletal mus-
cles is met by increases in heart rate and cardiac output. In patients
with significant CAD, the increase in myocardial oxygen demand
cannot be met by a proportional increase in coronary blood flow, and
myocardial ischemia may produce chest pain and characteristic ECG
CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
[13N]-ammonia
18
F]-deoxyglucose
[
13
[
N]-ammonia
18
F]-deoxyglucose
[
35
13
[
N]-ammonia
18
[
F]-deoxyglucose
Fig. 4.14 Resting myocardial perfusion (obtained with [13N]-ammonia) and metabolism (obtained with
[18F]-deoxyglucose) is seen in positron emission tomography images of a patient with ischemic cardiomyop­athy. The study demonstrates a perfusion-metabolic mismatch (reflecting hibernating myocardium) in which large areas of hypoperfused (solid arrows) but metabolically viable (open arrows) myocardium involve the anterior, septal, and inferior walls and the left ventricular apex. Video 4.5 shows a dynamic image obtained with cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. (Courtesy Marcelo F. Di Carli, MD, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass.)
abnormalities. Combined with the hemodynamic response to exercise, these changes can give useful diagnostic and prognostic information for the patient with cardiac abnormalities. The most common indi­cations for stress testing include establishing a diagnosis of CAD in patients with chest pain, assessing prognosis and functional capacity of patients with chronic stable angina or after an MI, evaluating exer­cise-induced arrhythmias, and assessing for ischemia after a revascu­larization procedure. Contraindications to stress testing include acute coronary syndromes, poorly controlled hypertension (blood pressure >220/110 mm Hg), severe aortic stenosis (valve area <1.0 cm2), and decompensated congestive heart failure.
When to Stress Symptomatic Patients
Stress testing is most often used to evaluate symptoms concerning for flow-limiting coronary artery disease and make the diagnosis of CAD. The diagnostic accuracy of the stress test depends on several factors, including the pretest probability of CAD in a given patient, the sensi­tivity and specificity of the test results in that patient population, the adequacy of stress, and the criteria used to define a positive test. Stress
testing, when used to diagnose CAD, is one of the most useful and cost-effective tests in symptomatic patients who have an intermediate pretest probability of CAD, which is defined as a 10% to 90% risk. This is because in patients with a low pretest probability, a positive test does not significantly increase the post-test probability of CAD, and in patients with a high pretest probability, a negative test does not signifi­cantly decrease the post-test probability of CAD. The pretest proba­bility of CAD can be calculated through a variety of scores but is most commonly done based on a patient’s description of angina (Table 4.4).
Angina has three important components:
1. Substernal chest pain or discomfort
2. The pain or discomfort is provoked by exertion or emotional stress
3. The pain or discomfort is relieved by rest and/or nitroglycerin. Patients with all three components are said to have typical angina. Those with any two of the three components have atypical angina, and patients with nonanginal chest pain have only one or none of these components.
Other factors that are not solely based on the description of chest
discomfort may be present that would increase a patient’s pretest
36 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A
C
Fig. 4.15 Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of chest pain or ischemic heart dis-
ease. (A) First-pass perfusion study during vasodilator stress shows a large septal perfusion defect (arrow). The hypoperfused area appears dark compared with the myocardium with normal perfusion. (B) Example of delayed enhancement imaging of an almost transmural infarction of the mid-inferolateral wall, including the posterior papillary muscle. Infarcted myocardium appears white, whereas normal myocardium is black (arrow). (C) Nontransmural (subendocardial) infarction of the septum and apex (arrow). (D) Patient with acute myocarditis mimicking an acute coronary syndrome. Midmyocardial, rather than subendocardial, delayed enhancement is characteristic of myocarditis (arrow).
probability of CAD. These include baseline ECG abnormalities sug­gestive of CAD and multiple CAD risk factors, such as diabetes, smok­ing, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or family history of premature CAD. These should be taken into consideration on an individual basis and may require an upward revision of pretest probability.
Stress Modalities
There are two essential components to any stress test: the type of stress and the imaging modality. Stress can either be exercise-induced or pharmacologic. Exercise level is deemed adequate if the patient achieves 85% of his or her maximal predicted heart rate. Submaximal stress tests can still be interpreted but may be limited in the ability to rule out disease due to decreased sensitivity. Indications for ter­minating a stress test include fatigue, severe hypertension (>220 mm Hg systolic), worsening angina during exercise, developing marked or widespread ischemic ECG changes, significant arrhythmias, or hypotension.
For patients who are able to exercise, the most commonly used exercise protocols are the Bruce and modified Bruce protocols. These protocols require a patient to walk on a treadmill as the speed and incline of the belt increases with each advancing stage. Any patient who can exercise should do so, as duration of exercise and provoked symptoms provide valuable clinical and prognostic information for the physician. The modified Bruce or similar protocols are ideal for older, overweight, unstable, or debilitated patients. Additionally, in patients
B
D
unable to exercise on a treadmill, bicycle or arm ergometer testing may also be used. In patients who cannot exercise or in those where exer­cise will interfere with image acquisition, pharmacologic agents may be used.
The most commonly used pharmacologic stress agents are dobu­tamine, adenosine, and regadenoson, an adenosine derivative and selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist. Dobutamine is a synthetic sympathomimetic that stimulates alpha-1, beta-1, and beta-2 recep­tors, increasing inotropy and chronotropy, thereby increasing myocar­dial oxygen demand. It should be used cautiously in patients with a history of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias as it can exacerbate both. Regadenoson is an adenosine receptor agonist that induces coronary vasodilation and is more commonly used in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Its use is contraindicated in patients with asthma or COPD and active wheezing as well as patients with significant brad­yarrhythmias without a pacemaker. It should be used with caution in patients with a history of seizures as it can lower the seizure threshold.
STRESS IMAGING
Exercise or pharmacologic stress testing must be combined with imag­ing modalities to assess for characteristic changes seen in flow-limiting coronary artery disease. The most basic form of imaging is an ECG, which can be combined with adjunctive echocardiography or radionu­clide imaging to increase the diagnostic accuracy of the testing.
CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
37
A
C
Fig. 4.16 Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used in the evaluation of cardiomyopathies. (A)
Severe left ventricular hypertrophy in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Diastolic frame shows open mitral valve (arrow). (B) Systolic frame shows systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve with flow disturbance in the left ventricular outflow tract (arrow). (C) Patient has left ventricular noncompaction as evi­denced by deep trabeculations in the left ventricular apex (arrow). (D) Patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy has transmural apical infarction and adjacent mural thrombus (arrow). Video 4.6 shows a dynamic cardiac MRI image. (Images courtesy Sheldon E. Litwin, MD, Division of Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.)
B
D
TABLE 4.4 Diamond and Forrester Pretest Probability of Coronary Artery Disease by Age, Sex,
and Symptoms
Age (Years) Sex Typical/Definite Angina Pectoris Atypical/Probable Angina Pectoris Nonanginal Chest Pain
39 Men Intermediate Intermediate Low
Women Intermediate Very low Very low
40-49 Men High Intermediate Intermediate
Women Intermediate Low Very low
50-59 Men High Intermediate Intermediate
Women Intermediate Intermediate Low
60 Men High Intermediate Intermediate
Women High Intermediate Intermediate
High: >90% pretest probability. Intermediate: between 10% and 90% pretest probability. Low: between 5% and 10% pretest probability. Very low: <5% pretest probability. From Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al: ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality Appropriate Use Crite­ria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63:380-406, 2014.
38 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Stress Electrocardiography
The normal physiologic response to exercise is an increase in heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The ECG maintains normal T-wave polarity, and the ST segment remains unchanged or, if depressed, has a rapid upstroke back to baseline. An ischemic ECG response to exercise is defined as 1.5 mm of upsloping ST-segment depression measured 0.08 second past the J point, at least 1 mm of hor­izontal ST depression, or 1 mm of downsloping ST-segment depres­sion measured at the J point. Given the large amount of artifact on the ECG that may occur with exercise, these changes must be seen in at least three consecutive depolarizations. Other findings that suggest more extensive CAD include early onset of ST depression (6 minutes); marked, downsloping ST depression (>2 mm), especially if present in more than five leads; ST changes persisting into recovery for more than 5 minutes; and failure to increase systolic blood pressure to 120 mm Hg or more or a sustained decrease of 10 mm Hg or more below baseline.
The ECG is not diagnostically useful in the setting of left ventricu­lar hypertrophy, LBBB, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, or chronic digoxin therapy. In these instances, further imaging modalities such as echocardiography, nuclear imaging, or positron-emission tomography (PET) are needed to help diagnose ischemia.
Stress Echocardiography
Two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography are often used in conjunction with exercise or pharmacologic stress testing. The pharmacologic agent typically used is dobutamine. A base­line echocardiogram is performed at rest and during stress. Changes in wall motion are indicative of ischemia and coronary artery disease. In areas of the left ventricle that have wall motion abnormalities at rest, improvement of these wall motion abnormalities with exercise or low­dose dobutamine is indicative of viability.
Relative to myocardial perfusion imaging, the sensitivity of stress echocardiography is slightly lower whereas the specificity is slightly higher. A poor baseline echocardiogram due to limited acoustic win­dows will limit stress test results. The estimated cost-effectiveness of stress echocardiography is significantly better than nuclear perfusion imaging because of the overall lower cost.
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (See Also Nuclear Cardiology Section)
Stress testing, using myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT to compare relative coronary blood flow at stress and at rest, helps to identify areas of perfusion mismatch, indicative of ischemia. Like with other stress modalities, exercise or pharmacologic stress can be used. Commonly used pharmacologic agents include dipyridamole, adenos­ine, and regadenoson, which are all coronary vasodilators. It is import­ant to note that patients with LBBB have to undergo pharmacologic stress when receiving myocardial perfusion imaging, even if they are able to exercise, as the abnormal septal motion caused by the LBBB can lead to a false perfusion defect during exercise.
Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Though either exercise or pharmacologic stress may be combined with cMRI, the contemporary use of stress cMRI usually refers to stress per­fusion cMRI with gadolinium contrast that is performed with regade­noson. This technique allows for evaluation of wall motion, perfusion, scar, viability, and microvascular dysfunction, as well as chamber quantification and function, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of the myocardium and myocardial function. Changes in late gadolin­ium enhancement between rest and stress has performance character­istics for diagnosing CAD that are at least as good and likely superior to
those of conventional stress tests using nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging or echocardiography, and on par with PET imaging.
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THE HEART
Newer applications of computed tomography (CT) have greatly advanced our ability to diagnose cardiovascular disease noninva­sively. The development of fast gantry rotation speeds and the addi­tion of multiple rows of detectors (i.e., multidetector CT) have allowed unprecedented visualization of the great vessels, heart, and coronary arteries with images acquired during a single breath-hold lasting 10 to 15 seconds. CT is used to diagnose aortic aneurysm, acute aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism, and it is useful for defining con­genital abnormalities and detecting pericardial thickening or calcifi­cation associated with constrictive pericarditis. ECG-gated dynamic CT images have been used to quantify ventricular size, function, and regional wall motion (Video 4.7), and in contrast to echocardiography, CT is not limited by lung disease or chest wall deformity. However, obesity and implanted prosthetic materials (i.e., mechanical valves or pacing wires) may affect image quality.
The greatest excitement and controversy about cardiac CT relates to the evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis. Electron beam and mul­tidetector CT scans can be used to quickly and reliably visualize and quantitate the extent of coronary artery calcification (Fig. 4.17). The presence of coronary calcium is pathognomonic of atherosclerosis, and the extent of coronary calcium (usually reported as an Agatston score) is a powerful marker of future cardiovascular events. The coronary cal­cium score adds substantial, independent improvement in risk predic­tion to the commonly employed clinical risk scores (e.g., Framingham risk score). Moreover, the calcium score is a good marker of the overall atherosclerotic burden. Indications for coronary calcium scoring con­tinue to grow, especially in refining risk predictions in asymptomatic patients at intermediate risk for arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has improved dramatically in recent years. CCTA has a sen­sitivity of more than 95% in diagnosing significant coronary artery obstruction. Unlike myocardial perfusion imaging, CCTA is an ana­tomic test, and thus does not give information on perfusion or blood flow across a lesion. Thus, in patients with known coronary disease, CCTA cannot easily differentiate between ischemic and nonischemic chest pain. New technology is being developed to noninvasively deter­mine the hemodynamic significance of a lesion through CCTA, similar to fractional flow reserve in coronary catheterization, though this tech­nology still needs to be rigorously tested and standardized. Evaluation of coronary arteries with CCTA can be significantly limited in patients with extensive coronary calcifications, cardiac devices, or prior stents due to technical limitations.
Concerns that limit the widespread use of cardiac CT most fre­quently cite the risks of radiation and contrast exposure and the lack of prospective studies showing improvement in outcome with this testing modality. In early studies, the calculated radiation exposure of CCTA was about double that of a diagnostic invasive coronary angiogram, although with prospective ECG-gating, most studies are now equal to or less than a diagnostic angiogram. Contrast use is often higher in a CCTA than in a diagnostic invasive coronary angiogram. The role of CCTA in routine clinical practice continues to evolve.
CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION
Cardiac catheterization is an invasive technique in which fluid-filled catheters are introduced percutaneously into the arterial and/or venous circulation. This method allows direct measurement of intracardiac
CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
39
A
C
B
D
Fig. 4.17 Computed tomography coronary angiography compared with conventional radiographic contrast
angiography. (A and B) Volume-rendering technique demonstrates stenosis of the right coronary artery and normal left coronary artery. (C and D) Maximal intensity projection of the same arteries demonstrates severe noncalcified plaque in the right coronary artery with superficial calcified plaque. (E and F) Invasive angiogra­phy of the same arteries. (From Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, et al: Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography, J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557, 2005.)
pressures and oxygen saturation and, with the injection of a contrast agent, visualization of the coronary arteries, cardiac chambers, and great vessels. Cardiac catheterization is indicated when a clinically sug­gested cardiac abnormality requires confirmation and its anatomic and physiologic importance needs to be quantified. Coronary angiography for the diagnosis of CAD is the most common indication for this test.
Compared with catheterization, noninvasive testing with echocar­diography is safer, often cheaper, and equally effective in the evalu­ation of most valvular and hemodynamic conditions. Most often, catheterization precedes some type of beneficial intervention, such as
FE
coronary artery angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, or valvular sur­gery. Although cardiac catheterization is usually safe (0.1% to 0.2% overall mortality rate), procedure-related complications such as vascu­lar injury, renal failure, stroke, and MI can occur.
Left Heart Catheterization and Coronary Angiography
Left heart catheterization and coronary angiography first requires the introduction of wires and fluid-filled catheters into the arterial system of the body. In the past, femoral arterial access was the default route, but now, radial arterial access has become increasingly more common.
Cardia
Oxygen consumption
oxygen content)
mm Hg
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
40 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
200
100
20
Fig. 4.18 Electrocardiographic tracing and left ventricular (LV) and aortic
(AO) pressure curves in a patient with aortic stenosis. A pressure gradi­ent occurs across the aortic valve during systole.
It has replaced femoral arterial access as the default access site in most centers. Radial arterial access is associated with less bleeding, fewer vas­cular complications, and increased patient comfort and early mobil­ity after the procedure when compared with femoral arterial access. However, it is also associated with higher radiation exposure and increased procedural time.
After access is obtained, wires and fluid-filled catheters are advanced to the aortic root and through the aortic valve into the left ventricle under fluoroscopic guidance. Here, left ventricular size, wall motion, and ejection fraction can be accurately assessed by injecting contrast into the left ventricle (i.e., left ventriculography). Aortic and mitral valve insufficiency can be qualitatively assessed during angiography by observing the reflux of contrast medium into the left ventricle and left atrium, respectively. Left ventricular pressures can be directly mea­sured and recorded, and the catheter can slowly be pulled back across the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic valve to directly assess for any pressure differential that would be consistent with aortic stenosis or LVOT obstruction (Fig. 4.18).
The coronary anatomy can be defined by injecting contrast medium into the coronary tree. Atherosclerotic lesions appear as nar­rowing of the internal diameter (lumen) of the vessel. A hemodynam­ically important stenosis is defined as 70% or more narrowing of the luminal diameter. However, the hemodynamic significance of a lesion can be underestimated by coronary angiography, particularly when the atherosclerotic plaque is eccentric or elongated. Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, or miniaturized pres­sure sensors can be used during invasive procedures to help evaluate the severity or estimate the physiologic significance of intermediate lesions.
LV
AO
Right Heart Catheterization
Right heart catheterization is a useful invasive technique that can be performed at bedside or with fluoroscopic guidance. The pulmonary artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter, which is a balloon-tipped catheter used for right heart catheterization, can be left in a patient for a prolonged period of time in a critical care setting to provide continuous infor­mation on cardiovascular hemodynamics and filling pressures. Right heart catheterization can be helpful when used in appropriate situa­tions, such as when differentiating noncardiogenic from cardiogenic
pulmonary edema, managing mixed shock, managing cardiogenic shock, and classifying and treating pulmonary hypertension.
Right heart catheterization is performed by first accessing the venous system. Common sites of entry for right heart catheterization include the internal jugular vein (usually the right), the right brachial vein, or the femoral veins. The procedure can be performed at the bedside or under fluoroscopic guidance with a balloon-tipped (Swan-Ganz) catheter. The catheter is advanced from the vein to the right atrium, right ventricle, and pulmonary artery, where pressures are measured and recorded. The catheter can then be advanced further until it wedges in the distal pul­monary artery. The transmitted pressure measured in this location origi­nates from the pulmonary venous system and is known as the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. In the absence of pulmonary venous disease, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reflects left atrial pressure, and if no significant mitral valve pathologic condition exists, it reflects left ventric­ular diastolic pressure. A more direct method of obtaining left ventricu­lar filling pressures is through left heart catheterization, as described in the previous section. With these two methods of obtaining intracardiac pressures, each chamber of the heart can be directly assessed and the gradients across any of the valves determined (Fig. 4.19).
Cardiac output can be determined by one of two widely accepted methods: the Fick oxygen method and the indicator dilution tech­nique. The basis of the Fick method is that total uptake or release of a substance by an organ is equal to the product of blood flow to that organ and the concentration difference of that substance between the arterial and venous circulation of that organ. If this method is applied to the lungs, the substance released into the blood is oxygen; if no intrapulmonary shunts exist, pulmonary blood flow is equal to sys­temic blood flow or cardiac output. The cardiac output can be deter­mined by the following equation:
c output =
(Arterial oxygen content _ Venous
Oxygen consumption is measured in milliliters per minute by collect­ing the patient’s expired air over a known period while simultaneously measuring oxygen saturation in a sample of arterial and mixed venous blood (i.e., arterial and venous oxygen content, respectively, measured in milliliters per liter). The cardiac output is expressed in liters per minute and then corrected for body surface area (i.e., cardiac index). The normal range of cardiac index is 2.6 to 4.2 L/min/m2. Cardiac out­put can also be determined by the indicator dilution technique, which most commonly uses cold saline as the indicator. With this method, cold saline is injected into the blood, and the resulting temperature change downstream is monitored. This action generates a curve in which temperature change is plotted over time, and the area under the curve represents cardiac output.
Detection and localization of intracardiac shunts can be performed by sequential measurement of oxygen saturation in the venous system, right side of the heart, and two main pulmonary arteries. In patients with left-to-right shunt flow, an increase in oxygen step-up (i.e., satu­ration increase from one chamber to the successive chamber) occurs as arterial blood mixes with venous blood. By using the Fick method for calculating blood flow in the pulmonary and systemic systems, the shunt ratio can be calculated. Noninvasive approaches have largely supplanted catheterization laboratory assessment of shunts.
In the past, the Swan-Ganz catheter was routinely used in most patients with shock; however, randomized trials have since been published suggesting no improvement in outcomes in critically ill patients in whom pulmonary artery catheterization was performed.
CHAPTER 4 Diagnostic Tests and Procedures in the Patient With Cardiovascular Disease
A
ECG
B
Radial artery
pressure (mm Hg)
100
0
C
Pulmonary
capillary
pressure (mm Hg)
40
wedge
20
41
0
D
Right atrial
pressure (mm Hg)
Fig. 4.19 Electrocardiographic (ECG) (A) and Swan-Ganz flotation catheter (C) recordings are shown. The
recordings of a catheter in the radial artery and Swan-Ganz floating catheter in the right atrium are shown in B and D, respectively. The left portion of tracing C was obtained with the balloon inflated, yielding the pulmo­nary arterial wedge pressure. The right portion of tracing C was recorded with the balloon deflated, depicting the pulmonary arterial pressure. In this patient, the pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (i.e., left ventricular filling pressure) is normal, and the pulmonary artery pressure is elevated because of lung disease.
Certainly, improvements in noninvasive imaging techniques have made the Swan-Ganz catheter much less important in diagnosing car­diac conditions such as cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis, right ventricular infarction, and ventricular septal defect. This led to a decline in the routine use of Swan-Ganz catheters in intensive care units. However, the use of these catheters has resurged, likely due to the increased use of advanced heart failure therapies and mechanical support, where continuous hemodynamic monitoring is essential for optimal therapy titration (Table 4.5).
20
10
0
ENDOMYOCARDIAL BIOPSY
Biopsy of the right ventricular endomyocardium can be performed. With this technique, a bioptome is introduced into the venous sys­tem through the right internal jugular vein and guided into the right
ventricle by fluoroscopy. Small samples of the endocardium are taken for histologic evaluation. The primary indication for endomyocar­dial biopsy is the diagnosis of rejection after cardiac transplantation and documentation of cardiac amyloidosis; however, endomyocar­dial biopsy may have some use in diagnosing specific etiologic agents responsible for myocarditis.
NONINVASIVE VASCULAR TESTING
Assessment for the presence and severity of peripheral vascular dis­ease is an important component of the cardiovascular evaluation. Comparison of the systolic blood pressure in the upper and lower extremities is one of the simplest tests to detect hemodynamically important arterial disease. Normally, the systolic pressure in the thigh is similar to that in the brachial artery. An ankle-to-brachial pressure
42 SECTION II Cardiovascular Disease
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
TABLE 4.5 Differential Diagnosis Using a Bedside Balloon Flow-Directed (Swan-Ganz) Catheter
Thermodilution Cardiac
Disease State
Cardiogenic shock nl or Systemic vascular resistance Septic shock (early) Systemic vascular resistance; myocardial
Volume overload nl or Volume depletion Noncardiac pulmonary edema nl nl nl Pulmonary heart disease nl or nl PA pressure RV infarction or nl Pericardial tamponade nl or Equalization of diastolic RA, RV, PA, and
Papillary muscle rupture nl or Ventricular septal rupture nl or Artifact caused by RA PA sampling higher
nl, Normal; PA, pulmonary artery; PCW, pulmonary capillary wedge; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle; , increased; , decreased.
Output PCW Pressure RA Pressure Comments
dysfunction can occur late
PCW pressure
Large v waves in PCW tracing
in PA than RA; may have large v waves in PCW tracing
ratio (i.e., ankle-brachial index) of less than or equal to 0.9 is abnor­mal. Patients with claudication usually have an index ranging from 0.5 to 0.8, and patients with rest pain have an index less than 0.5. In some patients, measuring the ankle-brachial index after treadmill exercise may help to determine the importance of borderline lesions. During normal exercise, blood flow increases to the upper and lower extrem­ities with corresponding decreases in peripheral vascular resistance, whereas the overall ankle-brachial index remains unchanged. In the presence of a hemodynamically significant lesion, the reduced flow across the lesions causes a consequent pressure decrease, and as a result, the ankle-brachial index decreases in proportion to the severity of the stenosis. Some patients, especially those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, may have falsely elevated ankle-brachial indices due to vascular stiffness (>1.3). In these patients, a toe-brachial index can be measured. In general, a toe-brachial index less than 0.6 indicates abnormal perfusion in the foot, though the site of the occlusive disease would have to be identified with further studies.
After significant vascular disease in the extremities has been iden­tified, plethysmography can be used to determine the location and severity of the disease. With this method, a pneumatic cuff is posi­tioned on the leg or thigh, and when inflated, temporarily obstructs venous return. Volume changes in the limb segment below the cuff are converted to a pressure waveform, which can be analyzed. The degree of amplitude reduction in the pressure waveform corresponds to the severity of arterial disease at that level.
Doppler ultrasound uses reflected sound waves to identify and localize stenotic lesions in the peripheral arteries. This test is partic­ularly useful for patients with severely calcified arteries, for whom pneumatic compression is not possible and ankle-brachial indices are inaccurate. In combination with real-time imaging (i.e., duplex imag­ing), this technique is useful in assessing specific arterial segments and bypass grafts for stenotic or occlusive lesions.
Magnetic resonance angiography and CTA allow high-quality and comprehensive imaging of the entire peripheral arterial circulation in
a single study. The three-dimensional nature of these studies and the ability to perform extensive postprocessing views, including cross-sec­tional views, of all vessels, even those that are very tortuous, are attrac­tive features of these modalities.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Fihn SD, Blakenship JC, Alexander KP, et al: 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/
SCAI/STS Focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and manage­ment of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, Circulation 130:1749­1767, 2014.
Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, et al: Recommendations for the standard-
ization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electro­cardiogram and its technology a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the Interna­tional Society for Computerized Electrocardiology, J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1109-1127, 2007.
Otto CM: Textbook of clinical echocardiography, ed 6, Chapter 2, Normal
anatomy and flow patterns on transthoracic echocardiography, Philadel­phia, Elsevier, pp. 33-65, 578p.
Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock, WF, et al: 2015 ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/
ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS Appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in emergency department patients with chest pain: a joint document of the American College of Radiology Appro­priateness Criteria Committee and the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, J Am Coll Cardiol 13:e1-e29, 2016.
St. John Sutton M, Morrison AR, Sinusas AJ, Ferrari VA: Heart failure: a com-
panion to braunwald’s heart disease, ed 4, Mann DL, Felker GM, editors: Philadelphia, Elsevier Inc, 2019, Chapter 32, Cardiac imaging in heart failure, p.418-448. 739p.
Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al: ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/
SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 Multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease, J Am Coll Cardiol 63:380-406, 2014.