Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_2693_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Cohort Study
- •Contributors
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Risk Scoring
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Clinical Trial
- •Cohort Study
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Pediatric Considerations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Clinical Trial
- •Cohort Study
- •Comparative Study
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Risk Scoring
- •Special Populations
- •Comorbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Cohort Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Clinical Trial
- •Cohort Study
- •Case Study
- •Editorial/Comment
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Electrocardiography
- •Cardiac Enzymes
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Cohort Study
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors that Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors that Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-Morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Meta-Analysis
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Other Studies
- •Special Populations
- •Pediatrics
- •Elderly
- •Pregnancy
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Cohort Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory Studies
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Pediatric Considerations
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Cohort Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Cohort Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Pulmonary Function Tests
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Clinical Trial
- •Comparative Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Cohort Study
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Pregnancy
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Imaging
- •Electrocardiography
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Clinical Trial
- •General
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Imaging
- •Electrocardiography
- •Cardiac Enzymes
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •General
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Children
- •The Elderly
- •During Pregnancy
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Meta-Analysis
- •Review
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary studies
- •Electrocardiography
- •Laboratory
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence:
- •Cohort Study
- •Comparative Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Other Studies
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Review
- •Case Study
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Imaging
- •Other
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Meta-Analysis
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors that Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors that Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Other Studies
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Practice Guideline
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations
- •Factors That Suggest Diagnosis
- •Factors That Exclude Diagnosis
- •Ancillary Studies
- •Laboratory
- •Electrocardiography
- •Imaging
- •Other Studies
- •Special Populations
- •Co-morbidities
- •Mimics
- •Time-Dependent Interventions
- •Disease Course
- •Related Evidence
- •Review
- •Incidence/Epidemiology
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Presentation
- •Typical/“Classic”
- •Atypical
- •Primary Differential Considerations

488
C. V. Pollack, Jr. and V. G. Riese
Treatment of acute hypertensive heart failure. The left ventricular (LV) end‐
diastolic pressure‐volume relationships (compliance curves) in acute hypertensive
heart failure (AHHF) before and after treatment with sodium nitroprusside are represented schematically. In AHHF, the pressure‐volume curve is shifted up and to the
left, reecting an acute decrease in LV compliance caused by severe systemic
hypertension. In this setting, a higher than normal LV end‐diastolic pressure
(LVEDP) is required to achieve any given level of LV end‐diastolic volume
(LVEDV). Normal LV systolic function (ejection fraction and cardiac output) is
maintained but at the expense of a very high wedge pressure that results in acute
pulmonary edema. Treatment with sodium nitroprusside causes a reduction in the
elevated systemic vascular resistance, with a concomitant decrease in impedance to
LV ejection. As a result, LV compliance improves. Pulmonary edema resolves
owing to a reduction in LVEDP, despite the fact that LVEDV actually increases during treatment. Sodium nitroprusside is the preferred drug for treatment of
AHHF. There is no absolute blood pressure goal. The infusion should be titrated
until signs and symptoms of pulmonary edema resolve or the blood pressure
decreases to hypotensive levels. Rarely is it necessary to lower the blood pressure to
this extent, however, because reduction to levels still within the hypertensive range
is usually associated with dramatic clinical improvement. Although hemodynamic
monitoring is not always required, it is essential in patients in whom concomitant
myocardial ischemia or compromised cardiac output is suspected. After the hypertensive crisis has been controlled and pulmonary edema has resolved, oral antihypertensive therapy can be substituted as the patient is weaned from the nitroprusside

32 Heart Failure
489
infusion. As in the treatment of hypertensive patients with chronic congestive heart
failure symptoms owing to isolated diastolic dysfunction, agents such as β‐blockers,
angiotension‐converting enzyme inhibitors, or calcium channel blockers may represent logical rst‐line therapy. These agents directly improve diastolic function in
addition to reducing systemic blood pressure. In patients with malignant hypertension or resistant hypertension, however, adequate control of blood pressure may
require therapy with more than one drug. Potent direct‐acting vasodilators such as
hydralazine or minoxidil may be used in conjunction with a β‐blocker to control
reex tachycardia and a diuretic to prevent reex salt and water retention. [Nolan
CR. Hypertensive Crises. In: Schrier RW, Wilcox CS. Atlas of Diseases of the
Kidney, Volume 3: Hypertension and the Kidney. Philadelphia: Current Medicine
Group; 1999. 182 p.] Caption from original
Goals of Treatment in Decompensated Heart Failure
Resolution of dyspnea and orthopnea Systolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg
Resolution of ascites and peripheral edema Right atrial pressure ≤ 8 mm Hg
Jugular venous pressure ≤ 8 cm H20
Control of hypertension
Minimize adverse effects of treatment, reduce duration and
cost of stay
Initiate treatments that improve long-term outcome
Clinical goals Hemodynamic goals
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤ 16
mm Hg
Systemic vascular resistance ≤ 1200
dynes/s/cm-5
Goals of treatment in decompensated heart failure. Goals of in-patient therapy. The
early goal of treatment is to improve symptoms while maintaining or improving the
hemodynamic status. Progress may be tracked by following body weights and uid
intake and output while monitoring vital signs, electrolytes, and renal function.
Consideration also should be given to identifying precipitating factors and etiology,
and patients who may benet from coronary revascularization. [Givertz MM,
Colucci WS.Heart Failure. In: Libby P, editor. Essential Atlas of Cardiovascular
Disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Current Medicine Group; 2009. 432 p.] Caption
adapted from original

490
Drug Dosing Potential Advantage Potential Disadvantages
C. V. Pollack, Jr. and V. G. Riese
Nitroglycerin
Nitroprusside
Nesiritide
Sublingual: 1 tablet
(or 1–2 sprays) three
or four times at 5minute intervals; IV:
0.4 μg/kg/min initially
(increase as needed)
IV: 0.1 μg/kg/min
initially; increase as
needed
0.005–0.01 μg/kg/min
initially, ± bolus;
increase as needed
Favorable effect on
coronary vasculature and in
myocardial
ischemia/infarction; preload
reduction > afterload
Relatively powerful preload
and afterload reduction
Preload and afterload
reduction; possible
facilitative effect on diuresis
Tolerance during prolonged infusion;
inadequate afterload reduction in
catastrophic cardiovascular disorders
(eg, acute valvular insufficiency,
ventricular rupture)
Less favorable effects on coronary
vasculature and myocardial ischemia;
administration must be closely monitored
to avoid marked hypotension;
thiocyanate or cyanide toxicity during
high-dose or prolonged infusions,
particularly in patients with renal or
hepatic dysfunction
Hypotension; meta-analysis of clinical
trials suggests adverse effects on
mortality and renal function
Principal preload‐ and afterload‐reducing drugs for acute or severe heart failure.
Nesiritide, nitroglycerin, and nitroprusside are the primary vasodilators used to
reduce excessive preload and afterload in acute or severe heart failure. Nitroglycerin
is used most often, particularly in conditions caused by occlusive atherosclerotic
coronary artery disease. Nitroprusside is the drug of choice when more aggressive
afterload and preload reduction are needed; examples include catastrophic cardiovascular events (eg, acute, severe mitral, or aortic regurgitation), hypertensive emergencies (eg, aortic dissection, pulmonary edema), and inadequate response to
nesiritide or nitroglycerin. [Ooi H, Colucci WS.Management of the Hospitalized
Patient. In: Colucci WS, editor. Atlas of heart failure, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Current
Medicine Group; 2008. 344 p. ISBN: 1-57340-261-3] Caption adapted from
original
Disease Course
• Prognosis depends on type and severity of failure.
• With aggressive medical therapy, ventricular assist devices, and even cardiac
transplant, even severe heart disease is no longer a short-term mortality
diagnosis.
• Patient compliance with management is an important predictor of both outcomes and quality of life.

32 Heart Failure
491
Related Evidence
Papers of particular interest have been highlighted as:
** Of key importance
Practice Guideline
Moe GW, Ezekowitz JA, O'Meara E, Lepage S, Howlett JG, Fremes S, Al-Hesayen
A, Heckman GA, Abrams H, Ducharme A, Estrella-Holder E, Grzeslo A,
Harkness K, Koshman SL, McDonald M, McKelvie R, Rajda M, Rao V, Swiggum
E, Virani S, Zieroth S, Arnold JM, Ashton T, D'Astous M, Chan M, De S, Dorian
P, Giannetti N, Haddad H, Isaac DL, Kouz S, Leblanc MH, Liu P, Ross HJ,
Sussex B, White M; Canadian Cardiovascular Society. The 2014 Canadian
Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Management Guidelines Focus Update:
anemia, biomarkers, and recent therapeutic trial implications. Can J Cardiol.
2015 Jan;31(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.10.022. PMID:
25532421. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25532421 **
Dworzynski K, Roberts E, Ludman A, Mant J; Guideline Development Group of the
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diagnosing and managing
acute heart failure in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014 Oct
8;349:g5695. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5695. PMID: 25296764. http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25296764 **
National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK). Acute Heart Failure: Diagnosing and
Managing Acute Heart Failure in Adults. London: National Institute for Health
and Care Excellence (UK); 2014 Oct. PMID: 25340219. http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pubmed/25340219 **
Page K, Marwick TH, Lee R, Grenfell R, Abhayaratna WP, Aggarwal A, Briffa TG,
Cameron J, Davidson PM, Driscoll A, Garton-Smith J, Gascard DJ, Hickey A,
Korczyk D, Mitchell JA, Sanders R, Spicer D, Stewart S, Wade V; National Heart
Foundation of Australia. A systematic approach to chronic heart failure care: a
consensus statement. Med J Aust. 2014 Aug 4;201(3):146-50. PMID: 25128948.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128948 **
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC,
Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi
FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F,
Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology
Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the
American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task
Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):e240-327. https://
doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776. PMID: 23741058. http://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741058
**

492
C. V. Pollack, Jr. and V. G. Riese
White RD, Patel MR, Abbara S, Bluemke DA, Herfkens RJ, Picard M, Shaw LJ,
Silver M, Stillman AE, Udelson J; American College of Radiology; American
College of Cardiology Foundation. 2013 ACCF/ACR/ASE/ASNC/SCCT/SCMR
appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging in heart failure: an executive
summary: a joint report of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Committee and
the ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013
Jul;10(7):493- 500.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.002. PMID: 23827001.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23827001 **
Review
Oktay AA, Shah SJ.Diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved
ejection fraction: 10 key lessons. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(1):42-52. PMID:
24251461. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24251461 **
Ferrero P, Iacovoni A, D'Elia E, Vaduganathan M, Gavazzi A, Senni M.Prognostic
scores in heart failure- Critical appraisal and practical use. Int J Cardiol. 2015
Mar 26;188:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.154. PMID: 25880571.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880571 **
Use PubMed Clinical Queries to nd the most recent evidence. Use this search
strategy:
“Heart Failure”[Mesh] OR “Heart Failure”

Chapter 33
Hemoptysis
CharlesV.Pollack,Jr., RichardM.Cantor, andVictoriaG.Riese
Name andSynonyms
Hemoptysis
Incidence/Epidemiology
• Hemoptysis is the expectoration of blood from the respiratory tract with
cough. Because coughing sometimes leads to vomiting (tussive emesis), it is
important to distinguish between hemoptysis and hematemesis.
• Hemoptysis may range in severity from scant blood-streaked mucous that is
self- limited to life-threatening airway obstruction from blood clots or diminished gas exchange in blood-lled alveoli.
• Because there are so many varied causes of hemoptysis, epidemiologic data
are not meaningful. Smokers and those with chronic lung or sinus disease are
more likely to have hemoptysis.
C. V. Pollack,Jr. ()
Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, PA, USA
R. M. Cantor
Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, State University of NewYork Upstate
Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
V. G. Riese
Librarian Consultant, Eldersburg, MD, USA
C. V. Pollack, Jr. (ed.), Differential Diagnosis of Cardiopulmonary Disease,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63895-9_33
493© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

494
C. V. Pollack, Jr. et al.
Denition of hemoptysis. [Bussières JS.Massive hemoptysis. In: Slinger P, editor.
Principles and practice of anesthesia for thoracic surgery [Internet]. New York:
Springer; 2011 [cited 2015 May 28]. p.485–96. Available from: http://link.springer.
com/10.1007/978-1-4419-0184-2_34] Caption from original
Differential Diagnosis
• The important rst differential issue to address is whether the bleeding is a
result of a respiratory or gastrointestinal (GI) cause. The possibility of epistaxis as a cause should also be evaluated. Beyond that, the differential concerns regard the cause of hemoptysis, which generally may be divided into
these categories:
• Infectious
• Vascular
• Iatrogenic
• Coagulopathic
• Traumatic
• Neoplastic
• Pulmonary miscellaneous

33 Hemoptysis
495
Causes of hemoptysis. [Subramanian S, Kate AH, Chhajed PN.Role of bronchoscopy in hemoptysis. In: Mehta A, Jain P, editors. Interventional bronchoscopy
[Internet]. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2013 [cited 2015 May 28]. p. 245–56.
Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-62703-395-4_14] Caption
from original
Pathophysiology andEtiology
• Hemoptysis may result from several different processes.
• The two most common causes are bronchitis and other lung infections and
endobronchial carcinoma with erosion into a bronchial vessel.
• Many patients may never have a denitive cause identied.
• Hemoptysis may result from inammation/infection or from physical injury
to a bronchial vessel.

496
• Hemoptysis may also result from the high pulmonary venous pressure that
results from severe mitral valve stenosis
• The mnemonic “BATTLE CAMP” may be helpful in remembering common
etiologies of hemoptysis:
Causes of hemoptysis—“Battlecamp.” [Hogan MJ.Bronchial artery interventions
in children. In: Temple M, Marshalleck FE, editors. Pediatric interventional radiology [Internet]. NewYork: Springer; 2014 [cited 2015 May 28]. p.71–83. Available
from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-5856-3_6] Caption from
original
C. V. Pollack, Jr. et al.
Presentation
Typical/“Classic”
• Patients who present “coughing up blood” usually are hemodynamically
stable (massive hemoptysis that causes shock is a medical emergency).
• Patients may not be able to distinguish among cough with expectoration of
blood caused by pulmonary sources, posterior epistaxis, and GI bleeding with
hematemesis.
• The amount of blood loss should be quickly assessed, and that will drive the
pace of evaluation and management.
Atypical
• “Rusty”-colored sputum may not be recognized as hemoptysis.

33 Hemoptysis
Primary Differential Considerations
• Primary differential considerations for hemoptysis are limited to:
• Epistaxis
• Hematemesis
• To help differentiate, remember that blood from the GI tract likely has
been exposed to the acidic pH of the stomach and will be darker, whereas
blood from the respiratory tract tends to be a brighter red, although chronic
infection/tumor may result in expectoration of “older” blood that is darker
in color.
• Airway foreign bodies
History andPhysical Exam
• Expectoration of even small amounts of blood may provoke signicant
anxiety in patients, and their quantication of the amount of blood loss may
be exaggerated.
• The rst historical factors to be established include:
497
• Timeframe—how long has hemoptysis been occurring?
• Course—is it getting worse or better?
• Character of hemoptysis—is it blood-streaked sputum or is it frank blood?
• Associated issues—fever and chills? Night sweats? Weight loss? Using an
anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug? Any chronic lung disease?
• Is there pleuritic chest pain with or without dyspnea, suggesting a pulmo-
nary embolism? Are there any signs of deep venous thrombosis?
• Is the patient a smoker?
• On physical examination, the lungs should be auscultated for evidence of
bronchospasm, consolidation, or pleural friction.
• Check the heart sounds for a murmur of mitral stenosis.
Mitral stenosis murmur. [Mitral stenosis (diastolic murmur); Easy Auscultation;
www.easyauscultation.com; copyright 2015, MedEdu LLC]
http://www.easyauscultation.com/cases?coursecaseorder=14&courseid=31
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
