Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_816_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Ducic Pearls
- •Advancement Flap
- •Rotational Flap
- •Transposition Flap
- •1: Local Flaps
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •2: Facial Regional Flaps
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique
- •Paramedian Forehead Flap
- •Melolabial Flap
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •3: Nasal Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •Implant Materials
- •Prosthetic Materials
- •Prosthetic Placement
- •Site-Specific Considerations
- •Auricular Reconstruction
- •Auricular Alloplastic Implant Reconstruction
- •Auricular Prosthetics
- •Nasal Reconstruction
- •Maxillary/Midface Reconstruction
- •Orbital Reconstruction
- •Ocular Implants
- •Orbital Prosthesis
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Musculature
- •Innervation
- •Arterial Supply
- •Reconstructive Ladder Approach
- •Perioperative Care
- •Intraoperative Setup
- •Postoperative Care
- •Partial Thickness Reconstruction
- •Partial Thickness Defects: Vermillion
- •Secondary Intention
- •Vermillion Advancement Flap
- •FAMM Flap [17]
- •Partial Thickness Defects: Cutaneous
- •Primary Closure
- •Skin Grafting
- •Local Flaps
- •Ergotrid Flap
- •Melolabial Flap
- •Full Thickness Reconstruction
- •Special Considerations: Lower Lip
- •Small Defects
- •Larger Defects
- •Special Considerations: Upper Lip
- •Local Flaps
- •Bilateral Lip Advancement Flap
- •Stair-Step Advancement Flap
- •Alar Crescent Flap
- •Karapandzic Flap
- •Gillies Fan Flap
- •Bernard–von Burow (and Webster Modification)
- •Local Flaps: Cross-Lip Flaps
- •Abbe Flap
- •Extended Abbe Flap
- •Estlander Flap
- •Free Tissue Transfer
- •Radial Forearm Free Flap
- •Managing Microstomia
- •Commissuroplasty
- •Summary
- •References
- •6: Pectoralis Major Flap
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Neurovascular Supply
- •Advantages
- •Flap Usage
- •Case Examples
- •Complications
- •Disadvantages
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Flap Harvest
- •Important Considerations
- •References
- •7: Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Arterial Anatomy
- •Venous Anatomy
- •Neural Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Set
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Ducic Pearls
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •8: Free Rectus Flap Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Operative Steps
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Flap Features
- •Pearls
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •9: The Radial Forearm Free Flap
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Indication/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrumentation
- •Donor Site Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Pearls/Pitfalls
- •References
- •10: Cervicodeltopectoral Flap
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Neurovascular Supply
- •Cervicodeltopectoral Flap Advantages
- •Cervicodeltopectoral Flap Disadvantages
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Flap Harvest
- •Important Considerations
- •Important Dimensions
- •Skin Island Dimensions
- •Artery
- •Vein
- •Nerve
- •Cervicodeltopectoral Flap Usage
- •Complications
- •Case Example
- •References
- •Introduction
- •History
- •Relevant Anatomy [and Nomenclature]
- •The Trapezius Muscle
- •Regional Anatomy
- •Blood Supply: Nomenclature
- •Flap Nomenclature
- •Operative Technique
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Positioning
- •Harvest Technique
- •Upper Trapezius Flap
- •Lower Trapezius Flap
- •Trapezius Free Flap
- •Donor-Site Morbidity
- •Limitations
- •Indications
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •12: Supraclavicular Flap
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrumentation
- •Surgical Technique
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •13: The Free Fibula Flap
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Indication/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrumentation
- •Donor Site Closure
- •Postoperative Management
- •Pearls/Pitfalls
- •References
- •History
- •Vascular System
- •Muscle
- •Bone
- •Fasciocutaneous Flaps
- •Operative Technique
- •Preoperative Evaluation
- •Flap Harvest
- •Scapular Tip Flap
- •Chimeric Flaps
- •Fascial Flaps
- •Virtual Surgical Planning
- •Midface Reconstruction
- •Mandible Reconstruction
- •Dental Implants
- •Limitations
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •15: The Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Flap
- •Introduction
- •Historical
- •Anatomy
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Clinical Exam
- •Imaging
- •Instrumentation/Requirements
- •Design/Technique
- •Patient Positioning
- •Radius Osteotomy
- •Proximal Donor Vessel Preparation
- •Nonvascularized Donor Site Reconstruction Techniques
- •Vascularized Soft Tissue Donor Site Reconstruction Techniques
- •Postop Management
- •Complications
- •Outcomes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Iliac Crest Nonvascularized Bone Harvest
- •Preoperative Considerations
- •Wound Closure
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •Pearls
- •Discussion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Buccal Branch Identification
- •Masseteric Nerve Identification
- •Nerve Transfer
- •Pearls
- •References
- •18: Outpatient Periocular Reanimation
- •Introduction
- •Pretarsal Upper Eyelid Weight Placement
- •Lateral Tarsal Strip Canthoplasty
- •Pearls
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Fascia Lata Harvest
- •Static Facial Suspension
- •Pearls
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Recipient Site Preparation
- •Sural Nerve Harvest
- •Cross-Face Nerve Grafting
- •Sterno-omohyoid Muscle Flap Harvest
- •Sterno-omohyoid Muscle Flap Inset
- •Pearls
- •References
- •21: Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instruments/Equipment
- •Surgical Technique
- •Marking
- •Surgical Steps/Incisions
- •Closing/Suturing
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •22: Cleft Palate Repair
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instruments/Equipment Set
- •Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Pearls
- •Von Langenbeck Palatoplasty
- •Two-Flap Palatoplasty (Bardach)
- •Special Considerations
- •Postoperative Management
- •Outcomes
- •Oronasal Fistula Rate
- •Velopharyngeal Dysfunction
- •Facial Growth
- •Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
- •References
- •23: Mandible Trauma Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Body
- •Condylar
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment
- •Surgical Technique
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •24: Midface Trauma Reconstruction
- •Introduction/History
- •Anatomy
- •Classification
- •Clinical Assessment
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Instrument/Equipment Setup
- •Site-Specific Surgical Techniques
- •Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures
- •Le Fort II Fractures
- •Pan Facial Fractures
- •Pediatric Midface Fracture Management
- •Complications
- •References
- •25: Frontal Sinus Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Anterior Table
- •Posterior Table
- •Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract
- •Grafts
- •Autologous Bone Grafts
- •Alloplastic Implants
- •Titanium Mesh
- •Medpor (Porous Polyethylene)
- •PEEK (Polyether-Ether Ketone)
- •Hydroxyapatite Cement
- •Methyl Methacrylate
- •Pericranial Flap
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •26: Orbital Trauma Reconstruction
- •Intro/History
- •Anatomy
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Preop Planning/Workup
- •Instruments/Setup
- •Surgical Technique/Pearls (Treatment)
- •Postop Management
- •References
- •27: Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
- •Introduction
- •Preoperative Planning
- •Surgical Technique: Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction
- •Grade 0
- •Grade 1
- •Grade 2
- •Grade 3
- •Intranasal Vascularized Pedicled Flaps
- •Nasoseptal Flap (Hadad-Bassagasteguy Flap)
- •Posterior Pedicle Inferior Turbinate Flap
- •Posterior Pedicle Middle Turbinate Flap
- •Regional Vascularized Extranasal Flaps
- •Endoscopic-Assisted Pericranial Flap
- •Temporoparietal Fascial Flap
- •Postoperative Care
- •References
- •28: Open (Anterior) Skull Base Repair
- •Introduction
- •Anatomy
- •Planning
- •Anatomic Factors
- •Patient Factors
- •Surgical Technique
- •Free Tissue Transfer
- •Temporoparietal Fascia Flap (TPFF)
- •Temporalis Muscle Flap
- •Postoperative Management
- •References
- •Index

106
N. Vahidi et al.
References
1. Ariyan S.The pectoralis major myocutaneous ap. A versatile ap for reconstruction in the
head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(1):73–81.
2. Erovic BM, Lercher P. Pectoralis major muscle ap. In: Manual of head and neck reconstruction using regional and free aps. Vienna: Springer; 2015. p. 129–42. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 3- 7091- 1172- 7_23.
3. Hueston JT, McConchie IH.A compound pectoral ap. Aust N Z J Surg. 1968;38(1):61–3.
4. Liu M, Liu W, Yang X, etal. Pectoralis major myocutaneous ap for head and neck defects in
the era of free aps: harvesting technique and indications. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46256. https://doi.
org/10.1038/srep46256.
5. Resto VA, McKenna MJ, Deschler DG.Pectoralis major ap in composite lateral skull base
defect reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(5):490–4. https://doi.
org/10.1001/archotol.133.5.490.

Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
AdrianA.Ong andFiyinSokoya
Introduction/History
The anterolateral thigh (ALT) ap was rst described by Song etal. and is based on
branches of the descending branch of the lateral circumex femoral artery (LCFA)
[1]. Its original description was that of a fasciocutaneous ap supplied by septocutaneous perforators; however, it has since been described as a ap with predominantly musculocutaneous perforator vessels through the vastus lateralis muscle. The
adoption of the ALT was initially slow due to concerns of unclear and unpredictable
anatomy of the vascular pedicle. However, with a better understanding of the anatomy, it is now known as a ap with a long, large-caliber vascular pedicle; and due
to the anatomic location, the ALT is amenable to a one- or two-team approach. The
ALT has gained popularity since its initial introduction and has become a workhorse
ap for the reconstruction of many types of head and neck defects, which can provide skin, fascia, muscle, or any combination of the above, with minimal donor site
morbidity. The ability to harvest a large skin paddle, and use multiple pedicles,
provides an additional advantage in reconstructing large skin defects of the face and
scalp [2].
7
A. A. Ong
Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, TX, USA
F. Sokoya (*)
Wellstar Health Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2024
F. Sokoya, A. G. Vincent (eds.), Manual of Head and Neck Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65999-7_7
107

108
Musculocutaneous
l
A. A. Ong and F. Sokoya
Anatomy
Arterial Anatomy
In the majority of cases, the ALT ap is supplied by the descending branch of the
LCFA, a branch of the profunda femoris artery, and travels between the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis muscles. Along its course, the descending branch of the
LCFA provides intramuscular branches to the rectus femoris muscle as well as
intramuscular branches to the vastus lateralis muscle, with one to three branches
(the “ABC system”) which then supply the skin in most cases. Figure7.1 shows a
cross-section of the thigh depicting the anatomy of the perforator vessels in the
ALT ap.
There are three types of cutaneous perforators to the ALT ap as described in the
literature [3]. In 90% of cases (type I), the cutaneous perforators originate from the
intramuscular branches of the descending branch of the LCFA.The most common
perforator (“perforator B”) is located near the midpoint between the anterior superior iliac spine and supralateral corner of the patella with the other two cutaneous
perforator vessels located approximately 5cm proximal (“perforator A”) and distal
(“perforator C”) to this point. In approximately 90% of cases, these are musculocutaneous perforators, with the remainder being septocutaneous perforators. In
approximately 5–10% of cases, the type II cutaneous perforators arise from the
transverse branch of the LCFA and have a long intramuscular course of up to 10cm.
Given the long intramuscular course, type II musculocutaneous perforators are
onerous to dissect. In the remaining 1–5% of cases, type III cutaneous perforators
Fig. 7.1 Location of septocutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators
Septocutaneous
perforator
perforator
M.vastus lateralis
LCFA
Deep femora
artery

Type I Type II Type III
7 Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
109
arise directly from the profunda femoris artery and travel through the rectus femoris
muscle before supplying the skin of the lateral thigh. The three types of vascular
supply to the ALT ap can be seen in Fig.7.2.
Depending on the perforator location, length of pedicle dissection, and location
of recipient vessels, the vascular pedicle averages approximately 12 cm (range
8–16cm) with a diameter of 2.1mm (range 2–2.25mm).
Venous Anatomy
Two venae comitantes typically accompany the descending branch of the LCFA
with an average diameter of 2.3mm (range 1.8–3.3mm). Due to the multiple H-type
connections between the venae comitantes, one or both venae comitantes may be
anastomosed to provide venous drainage.
Neural Anatomy
The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (L2–L3) provides the cutaneous innervation of
the lateral thigh, and can be included with the ap for sensory reinnervation. This
nerve arises approximately 10cm below the inguinal ligament medial to the sensor
A
BB
C
Fig. 7.2 Three branching patterns of cutaneous perforators of the lateral circumference femoral artery
B

110
fascia lata, and branches into an anterior and posterior segment to supply the
skin [4].
If the vastus lateralis muscle is to be included in the ALT ap, the motor nerve
for the vastus lateralis muscle can be harvested as well for a functional reconstruction. The vastus lateralis muscle is innervated by a branch of the posterior division
of the femoral nerve and travels in close proximity with the vascular pedicle. Prior
to the descending branch of the LCFA enters the vastus lateralis muscle, the motor
nerve turns laterally and sends branches to innervate the undersurface of the vastus
lateralis.
A. A. Ong and F. Sokoya
Indications/Contraindications
Due to the versality of donor site tissue, including skin, fascia, and/or muscle, the
ALT ap lends itself to the reconstruction of a variety of head and neck defects. In
the oral cavity, the ALT ap can be used for the full range of tongue reconstruction:
as a thin cutaneous perforator ap for partial glossectomy defects or as a myocutaneous ap including the vastus lateralis muscle for the reconstruction of near-total
or total glossectomy defects. In cases which require dead space obliteration such as
orbital exenteration defects, the myocutaneous ALT ap with vastus lateralis muscle
can also be used. For through-and-through defects requiring the reconstruction of
intraoral lining and external fascial skin, the ALT can be harvested with multiple
skin paddles with separate perforator vessels, or de-epithelialized to create separate
skin islands with a single perforator vessel [5, 6]. Additionally, as a ap which can
provide signicant bulk, the ALT ap can be used in total parotidectomy defects to
restore facial form and volume. Finally, the tubed ALT ap has been described for
esophageal reconstruction.
Relative contraindications of the ALT ap include thick hair-bearing skin of the
upper thigh requiring signicant postoperative grooming when used for reconstruction intraorally and inexperience with perforator ap dissection. In addition, the
thickness of the ap may be disadvantageous for reconstruction of certain defects,
providing unnecessary bulk at the recipient site.
Preoperative Planning
During the preoperative evaluation, the surgeon should pay careful attention to
patient’s knee range of motion. Due to the location of the vascular pedicle through
the vastus lateralis muscle, intramuscular dissection or even harvest of the vastus
lateralis may cause increased risk of functional impairment of the knee postoperatively; however, many regain preoperative functionality [7, 8].
Unlike the peroneal artery which supplies the bula free ap, the LCFA is rarely
affected by atherosclerotic disease, and angiography is seldom required preoperatively. However, angiography can be obtained if there is concern for signicant
atherosclerosis or previous injury or operations of the upper thigh.

7 Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
The recipient site should be heavily considered when deciding on the use of the
ALT ap. Male patients may have thick hair overlying the lateral thigh, which is not
ideal for certain recipient sites such as the oral cavity. This can be addressed with
laser removal of hair preoperatively, or frequent shaving of the ap after reconstruction. In addition, in obese patients, the ALT ap may be excessively thick requiring
primary thinning or secondary debulking procedures to achieve optimal outcomes.
111
Instrument/Equipment Set
A hand-held Doppler can be used preoperatively to identify the approximate location of the cutaneous perforators prior to the initial incision. A typical soft tissue
instrument set can be used for the dissection. When beginning the initial dissection,
skin hooks can be utilized to retract the rectus femoris medially and the ap laterally
to provide better exposure to the intermuscular septum. Alternatively, Allis clamps
can be placed on the fascia to provide counter traction for exposure of the intermuscular septum. During perforator dissection, surgical clips are used to isolate the
cutaneous perforator as it is traced back to the lateral LCFA.Microvascular anastomosis is performed using an operative microscope. Arterial anastomosis is performed with 8.0 or 9.0 nylon sutures, while venous anastomosis is performed with
an appropriately sized venous coupler. If there are concerns with the integrity of the
ap intraoperatively, near-infrared angiography can be used to determine the quality
of perfusion throughout the ap. Although no single monitoring technique is widely
accepted, a handheld Doppler or an implantable Doppler can be used postoperatively to monitor ap perfusion on the oor.
Flap Design/Surgical Technique/Ducic Pearls
In the operating room, the patient is generally placed in the supine position. The
anterior superior iliac spine and superolateral aspect of the patella are identied, and
a line is drawn connecting these points with the midpoint of the line being marked.
Figure7.3 illustrates these markings. A handheld Doppler can be used to identify
the general location of the cutaneous perforators. Once the cutaneous perforator is
identied, the ap is marked out based on the size of the recipient defect while centered on the cutaneous perforator. A ap measuring up to 8cm in width allows for
primary closure of the donor site. The length of the ap is determined by the recipient’s defect size with a maximum length of 40cm which can be harvested [9]. The
ap design can also be modied after visualization of the size and quality of the
cutaneous perforators intraoperatively.
After marking the ap, the medial incision is made rst through the skin and
subcutaneous tissue down to the fascia over the rectus femoris muscle. Depending
on the recipient defect needs, the ap can be harvested in either a subfascial or a
suprafascial plane. The subfascial dissection allows for easier identication of the
intermuscular septum and the perforator vessels. The length of intermuscular

112
A. A. Ong and F. Sokoya
To p
Superior
ASIS
X
Fig. 7.3 Position of the cutaneous perforators
5cm
x
A
1.5
x
B
Bottom
5cm
x
C
Inferior
AP line
49 cm
septum is exposed, and the rectus femoris muscle is retracted medially to expose the
descending branch of the LCFA.Septocutaneous perforators occur in approximately
10% of cases and can be traced back to the descending branch of the LCFA [10]. In
cases with musculocutaneous perforator, an intramuscular dissection is executed
and followed in a retrograde fashion to the descending branch of the LCFA. Fine
tenotomy or Metzenbaum scissors are used to separate the muscle bers from the
perforator vessels. Any branching vessels that are identied are either cauterized
with a ne bipolar tip or ligated. Once the descending branch of the LCFA is
reached, the main pedicle is dissected until the adequate pedicle length is achieved.
Care should be taken to identify and preserve the motor nerve to the vastus lateralis
muscle along the course of the main pedicle. After conrmation of intact perforator
vessels, the ap design is nalized. The posterior incision is made to complete ap
harvest and taken to the vastus lateralis fascia if a subfascial dissection is performed.
Carefully note the location of the pedicle as undue traction may injure the pedicle.
The recipient vessels are prepared prior to pedicle division. Of note, a portion of, or
the entire vastus lateralis musculature may be harvested with the free ap by dividing the muscle inferiorly and superiorly. This is helpful if additional bulk is needed
at the recipient site. This technique also allows for expedited harvest of the ALT ap
as time is saved by obviating the need for perforator dissection.
In most cases, the ALT donor site can be closed primarily as long as the width of
the harvested ap is less than 8cm. Defects that are wider require closure with a
split-thickness skin graft. If a split-thickness skin graft is used, knee immobilization

7 Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap
113
is preferred to allow for optimal skin graft take. Depending on the surgeon’s preference, a closed-suction drain can be placed between the vastus lateralis and rectus
femoris muscles to minimize seroma and hematoma formation.
Postoperative Management
Flap monitoring to ensure ap viability is instituted immediately postoperatively
and based on the surgeon’s and institution’s preference. Hourly ap monitoring is
continued for the rst 72h postoperatively, either in the intensive care unit or in the
specialized step-down unit. No specic pharmacologic therapies are required postoperatively; this is determined by the surgeon’s preference. Our postoperative pharmacologic therapy includes the use of heparin and aspirin. For head and neck
reconstruction, patients are positioned with the head of the bed elevated at 30°, and
the neck is inspected to avoid compression by wires, intravenous lines, or tracheostomy straps, which may lead to pedicle compromise. If a closed-suction drain was
placed, it can be removed once the output has decreased to ≤30mL over 24h.
The ALT ap has a low complication rate, which can include seroma, hematoma,
wound dehiscence, infection, and neuroma [7]. The majority of patients regain their
preoperative level of function, even with the division of the motor nerve to the vastus lateralis muscle or harvesting of the vastus lateralis muscle.
References
1. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL.The free thigh ap: a new free ap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37(2):149–59.
2. Sokoya M, Deleyiannis FW.A triple pedicle, near-total thigh ap supercharged with the owthrough technique. Eplasty. 2016;16:e4.
3. Yu P, Selber J. Perforator patterns of the anteromedial thigh ap. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2011;128(3):151e–7e.
4. Ribuffo D, Cigna E, Gargano F, Spalvieri C, Scuderi N.The innervated anterolateral thigh ap:
anatomical study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(2):464–70.
5. Lawson BR, Moreno MA.Head and neck reconstruction with chimeric anterolateral thigh
free ap: indications, outcomes, and technical considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2016;154(1):59–65.
6. Sun G, Lu M, Hu Q, Tang E.Reconstruction of extensive through-and-through cheek defects
with free anterolateral thigh ap. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):e31–8.
7. Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ, Yu P.A prospective study of donor-site morbidity after anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free ap harvest in 220 patients. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2010;125(1):209–14.
8. Weise H, Naros A, Blumenstock G, Krimmel M, Hoefert S, Kluba S, etal. Donor site morbidity of the anterolateral thigh ap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(12):2105–8.
9. Chen HC, Tang YB. Anterolateral thigh ap: an ideal soft tissue ap. Clin Plast Surg.
2003;30(3):383–401.
10. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH.Have we found an ideal soft-tissue ap?
An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh aps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2219–26;
discussion 27–30.

Free Rectus Flap Reconstruction
AuroraG.Vincent andSpenceer R.Anderson
Introduction
The abdominal rectus free ap (ARFF) is a well-known vascularized free tissue ap
utilized among reconstructive surgeons [1–4]. The ARFF was rst described in
1980 [3] and later popularized by Hartrampf in 1982 [5], ultimately becoming a
workhorse ap for a diverse array of reconstructive needs. The ARFF is often the
head and neck reconstructive ap of choice for wounds that require bulky tissue for
adequate reconstruction. The ARFF offers consistent ap anatomy, ease of technical
elevation, up to 15cm of pedicle length, as well as the opportunity for a well-hidden
donor site scar [5, 6]. Herein, we review the ARFF including preoperative planning
needs, patient candidacy, intraoperative technique, postoperative monitoring, and
donor site management.
8
Operative Steps
Preoperative Considerations
The ARFF is a useful ap when a larger tissue bulk is needed for head and neck
reconstruction. It is worth considering in patients with a normal or low BMI.However,
A. G. Vincent (*)
Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
e-mail: aurora.g.vincent.mil@health.mil
S. R. Anderson
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of
Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2024
F. Sokoya, A. G. Vincent (eds.), Manual of Head and Neck Reconstruction,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65999-7_8
115

116
A. G. Vincent and S. R. Anderson
it is often not appropriate in patients who are overweight or obese, as excess subcutaneous adiposity creates too much tissue bulk in those cases. The ARFF is ideal for
reconstruction of total glossectomy defects and obliteration of deep wounds (such
as maxillectomy defects that included overlying skin excision, exenteration defects,
etc.) Patients should be queried about and examined for previous abdominal surgeries and scars. Ports for many laparoscopic procedures are often outside the dissection area for a rectus ap, so having had these procedures does not disqualify a
patient from undergoing ARFF harvest. Previous open abdominal surgery, however,
may have compromised the ap pedicle.
Flap Features
1. Vascular Supply: The arterial supply is derived from the deep inferior epigastric
artery and its perforators. The venous outow is via the venae comitantes.
2. Bulk: Signicant bulk suitable for total glossectomy defect reconstruction or
deep wound obliteration. Flap includes muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue,
and overlying skin. If a thinner bulk is necessary and a thinner ap (such as a
radial forearm ap) is not available, then the ARFF can be raised as a deep inferior epigastric perforator ap that includes only skin and subcutaneous tissue.
This technique requires perforator dissection through the rectus muscle.
3. Innervation: Thoracoabdominal nerve. Harvested ap is insensate.
Steps ofHarvest
1. Prep the abdomen from the palpable inferior edge of the ribs to the iliac crest.
Typically, prep can end, medially, just superior to where pubic hair begins; it
should not need to be trimmed or prepped into the eld.
2. Mark a box, roughly 6×6cm, centered vertically at the umbilicus, with its
medial edge just lateral to the umbilicus (Fig.8.1). Releasing incisions can be
marked extending superiorly and inferiorly, 2–3cm lateral to the umbilicus.
The superior extension should extend to the edge of the rectus muscle, just
below the rib margin. The inferior incision should extend to where the anterior
and posterior rectus fascia combine. Typically, this location can be visualized or
palpated.
(a) The shape of the ap can be altered from a square, as desired, given the
wound location, function, and size. In general, a 6×6cm square is a good
starting point and is typically a sufcient size for a total glossectomy defect.
The ap should not be made of a signicantly smaller size, or there is an
increased risk of damaging or excluding arterial perforators important for
ap survival.
(b) Note: There is no need to doppler out the location of perforating vessels.
Arterial perforators are reliably located 2–3cm lateral to the umbilicus.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
