Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4473_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
42 Мб
Скачать
(OD492)
mean ± SD
(OD492)
=
mean ± SD
7 Macrophage andMast Cell
https://t.me/medicina_free
83
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
IgE
0
Naive
OK–432
PBS Naive OK–432 PBS Naive
0.8 0.4
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2 0
IgG
1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
IgG
OK–432 PBS
:C3H/HeN (n = 5)
:C3H/HeJ (n = 5)
2a
*p < 0.005
Fig. 7.5 Antigen-specic Th1 and Th2 antibody in serum of C3H/HeN and C3H/HeJ mice after systemic sensitization with OVA and CFA
IgG
0.5 1.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Naive OK–432 PBS Naive OK–432 PBS Naive OK–432 PBS
IgE
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
IgG
:wild type (n = 5)
:TLR2 ko (n
2a
*p < 0.005
5)
Fig. 7.6 Antigen-specic Th1 and Th2 antibody titers in sera of TLR2 knockout and wild-type mice
quently suppress Th2-mediated allergic inam­mation in nasal mucosa (Fig.7.7).
7.3.2 Regulatory Role ofLymphoid Chemokines CCL19 andCCL21 intheControl ofAllergic Rhinitis
The lymphoid chemokines CCL19 and CCL21 are known to be crucial both for lymphoid cell traf­cking and for the structural organization of lym-
phoid tissues such as nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT). However, their role in allergic responses remains unclear, and so our cur­rent study aims to shed light on the role of CCL19/ CCL21 in the development of allergic rhinitis. After nasal challenge with OVA, OVA- sensitized plt (paucity of lymph node T cells) mice, which are decient in CCL19/CCL21, showed more severe allergic symptoms than did identically treated wild-type mice [22] (Fig. 7.8). OVA­specic IgE production, eosinophil inltration, and Th2 responses were enhanced in the upper air-
84
https://t.me/medicina_free
H. Kawauchi
Fig. 7.7 Summary of the effect of OK-432, which is a potent Th1 inducive biological response modiers, on the murine allergic rhinitis model. (1) OK-432 seems to induce IL-12 production from macrophages via TLR2 and
activate Th1 response and consequently downregulate antigen-specic Th2 response. (2) Prophylactic treatment with like as OK-432 (Th1 inducer) may be anticipated to regulate the induction phase of type-I allergic response
Fig. 7.8 Features of plt (paucity of lymph node T cells) mice
way of plt mice. Moreover, in plt mice, the number of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells declined in the secondary lymphoid tissues, whereas the number of Th2-inducer-type CD8+CD11b+ myeloid den­dritic cells (m-DCs) increased in cervical lymph
nodes and NALT. Nasal administration of the plasmid- encoding DNA of CCL19 resulted in the reduction of m-DCs in the secondary lymphoid tissues and the suppression of allergic responses in plt mice. These results suggest that CCL19 and
a
IL
4IL5 IL 13 IFN
7 Macrophage andMast Cell
https://t.me/medicina_free
85
CCL21 act as regulatory chemokines for the con­trol of airway allergic disease and so may offer a new strategy for the control of allergic disease. In a different study to focus on dendritic cells of regional lymph node, we constructed an effective murine model of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in allergic rhinitis, in which mice were sub­lingually administered with ovalbumin (OVA) fol­lowed by an intraperitoneal sensitization and nasal challenge of OVA [20]. Sublingually treated mice showed signicantly decreased allergic responses as well as suppressed Th2 immune responses (Fig.7.9). Sublingual administration of OVA did not alter the frequency of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), but led to the upregulation of Foxp3- and IL-10-specic mRNAs in the Tregs of cervical lymph nodes (CLN), which strongly sup­pressed Th2 cytokine production from CD4+CD25­effector T cells invitro. Furthermore, sublingual administration of plasmids encoding the lymphoid
chemokines CCL19 and CCL21-Ser DNA together with OVA suppressed allergic responses (Fig.7.10) [23]. These results suggest that IL-10­expressing CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs in CLN are involved in the suppression of allergic responses and that CCL19/CCL21 may contribute to it in mice received SLIT (Figs.7.11a–c).
To summarize our recent data, the important regulatory role of macrophage or dendritic cells and their interaction with T cells in nasal mucosa and its regional lymphoid organ are extensively demonstrated in accordance with human studies on these cells. However, further extensive basic and clinical research is required for pursuing the ideal treatment strategy.
Effect of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on Eliciting Phase of Murine Allergic Rhinitis Model in Relation with Toll-Like Receptor
Mast cells which are the key player at the elic­iting phase of allergic rhinitis have been reported
OVA 500
(D56)(D63)(D70)
g sl.
OVA 400 g in.OVA 25 g/Alum 1 mg ip. OVA 400 g in.
(Day0)(D 7)(D14) (D 21~34) (D 77~90)
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
OVA specific IgE(ng/ml)
b
PBS PBS OVAPBS OVAPBS OVAPBS OVAOVA
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
(pg/ml)
2,000
1,000
**
*
00
Fig. 7.9 Antigen-specic serum IgE production and Th1/ Th2 prole in spleen of mice which received therapeutic sublingual OVA treatment after induction of allergic rhini­tis. Mice were sublingually administered with either PBS or OVA after intraperitoneal sensitization and nasal chal­lenges with OVA.Thereafter, the mice received consecu­tive nasal challenges with OVA again and examined for their allergic responses. (a) OVA-specic IgE levels in
serum were assayed by sandwich ELISA. (b) Culture supernatants of CD4+T cells of spleen obtained from sub­lingually treated mice with allergic rhinitis were assessed for Th1 and Th2 cytokine production levels by ELISA.These data are representative of two independent experiments containing three to ve mice in each group. Signicance was evaluated by an unpaired t test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01
86
a
OV
OV
OVA−specific IgE(ng/ml)
**
https://t.me/medicina_free
H. Kawauchi
PBS OVA
29]. However, it is still controversial that LPS
effect on the eliciting phase of allergic inamma-
CCL19
tion. Therefore, we investigated the LPS effect on the eliciting phase of murine allergic rhinitis
CCL21
model.
As recently reported by Aoi et al., in our
GAPD
b
murine allergic rhinitis model, LPS instillation into the nasal cavity with ovalbumin (OVA) resulted in exacerbated nasal symptom and eosinophil inltration of wild type of mice (LPS-
1. 400
1. 200
responsive BALB/c strain) [30]. On the other hand, nasal symptom and eosinophil inltration
*
were evident in C3H/HeN (LPS-responsive) mice, but neither in C3H/HeJ (LPS-non-
1. 000
responsive) mice, nor mast cell-decient WBB6F1 W/Wv mice. IL-5 production by mast
800
600
400
cells in the nasal mucosa of wild type of mice (BALB/c) was enhanced by LPS co-instillation. But it was enhanced neither in those of C3H/HeJ mice nor WBB6F1 W/Wv mice. These data obtained with mast cell-decient WBB6F1 W/
200
0
OVA
PBS
pCCL19
pCCL21
A+pCCL19
A+pCCL21
Wv mice may indicate that LPS aggravated nasal symptom, upregulating Th2 cytokine production of mast cells via TLR4.
Therefore, we are summarizing our experi­mental data as follows. LPS instillation into nasal cavity, at the eliciting phase of murine model of
Fig. 7.10 Chemokine expression in CLN of sublingually treated mice and the effect of sublingual administration of pCCL19/pCCL21 with antigen on Th2-mediated allergic responses. (a) Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed to assess mRNA expression pattern of chemokines, CCL19 and CCL21in whole cells isolated from CLN of mice sublingually treated with either PBS or OVA. (b) Mice were sublingually administered with either PBS, OVA alone, 100mg of pCCL19 together with OVA, and 100mg of pCCL21 with OVA for total three times before systemic sensitization and nasal challenge. OVA-specic IgE levels in serum were assayed by sandwich ELISA
allergic rhinitis, actually exacerbates nasal symp­tom, which is accompanied by mast cell activa­tion and enhanced Th2 responses. These observations can be extrapolated into the human condition with better understanding the mecha­nisms of bacterial infection-induced exacerbation of the clinical features of allergic rhinitis. However, LPS concentration should be taken into account how does it affect on the nasal symptom at the eliciting phase as well as the induction of allergic rhinitis. Most our recent experimental
to produce Th2 cytokines invitro with lipopoly­saccharide (LPS) stimulation via TLR4, but invivo study remains to be performed [24, 25]. As it is reported in the hygiene hypothesis that neonatal exposure with LPS prevents allergic air­way diseases, allergic inammation is generally reported to be downregulated at the induction phase with the existence of bacterial LPS [26
data came to the conclusion that a low dose of LPS at eliciting phase of allergic rhinitis can exacerbate allergic nasal symptom but high dose of LPS at eliciting phase of allergic rhinitis con­versely downregulate nasal allergic symptom (Unpublished data). So, mast cell can be con­cluded also the key player as well as macrophage to modify upper respiratory allergic reactions.
7 Macrophage andMast Cell
https://t.me/medicina_free
a
87
b
Fig. 7.11 (a) Chemokine receptor CCR7 and its ligands CCL19 and CCL21 are involved in the chemotaxis of T cells and DCs. (b) In steady state, naturally occurring Tregs have inhibitory effects to the interaction of naïve T cells and m-DCs for the suppression of excessive Th2 differentiation
to inhaled allergen. (c) The deciency of CCL19/CCL21 somehow inhibits the accumulation of Tregs, which work as suppressor of Th2 environment induced by m-DCs in the secondary lymphoid tissues, resulted in the establishment of Th2-dominant allergic disease
88
c
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 7.11 (continued)
H. Kawauchi
References
1. Stanley ER.Lineage commitment: cytokines instruct, at last! Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(3):234–6.
2. Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, etal. Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. Science. 2010;327(5966):656–61.
3. Taylor PR, Martinez-Pomares L, Stacey M, et al. Macrophage receptors and immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:901–44.
4. Sallusto F, Baggiolini M.Chemokines and leukocyte trafc. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(9):949–52.
5. Aderem A, Underhill DM. Mechanisms of phago­cytosis in macrophages. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:593–623.
6. Hume DA.Macrophages as APC and the dendritic cell myth. J Immunol. 2008;181(9):5829–35.
7. Jutras I, Desjardins M. Phagocytosis: at the cross­roads of innate and adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:511–27.
8. Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, et al. Interferon-gamma: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75:163–89.
9. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. 2010;5:373–84.
10. Kawauchi H, DeMaria TF, Lim DJ.Endotoxin perme­ability through the round window. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1998;457:100–15.
11. Chen G, Shaw MH, etal. NOD-like receptors: role in innate immunity and inammatory disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009;4:365–98.
12. Lipscomb MF, Masten BJ. Dendritic cells: immune regulators in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:97–130.
13. Ichimiya I, Kawauchi H, Fujiyoshi T, et al. Distribution of immunocompetent cells in normal nasal mucosa: comparisons among germ-free, spe­cic pathogen-free, and conventional mice. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100(8):638–42.
14. Albegger KW. Cluster formation in human nasal polyps. A light: and electron-microscopic inves­tigation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1977;39(2):107–12.
15. Jahnsen FL, Gran E, Haye R, et al. Human nasal mucosa contains antigen-presenting cells of strikingly different functional phenotypes. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30:31–7.
16. Krysko O, Holtappels G, Zhang G, etal. Dendritic cells ameliorate autoimmunity in the CNS by control­ling the homeostasis of PD-1 receptor (+) regulatory T cells. Allergy. 2011;66(3):396–403.
17. Mizuno S, Kanai T, Mikami Y, etal. CCR9(+) plasma­cytoid dendritic cells in the small intestine suppress development of intestinal inammation in mice. Immunol Lett. 2012;146(1–2):64–9.
18. Yogev N, Frommer F, Lukas D, etal. Dendritic cells ameliorate autoimmunity in the CNS by controlling the homeostasis of PD-1 receptor (+) regulatory T cells. Immunity. 2012;37(2):264–75.
7 Macrophage andMast Cell
https://t.me/medicina_free
89
19. Kawauchi H, Aoi N, Murata A, etal. Clinical applica­tion of mucosal immune system for down-regulating nasal allergy. Arerugi. 2009;58(2):103–11.
20. Kawauchi H, Goda K, Tongu M, etal. Short review on sublingual immunotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis: from bench to bedside. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;72:103–6.
21. Takamura K, Fukuyama S, Nagatake T, et al. Regulatory role of CCL19 and CCL21in the control of allergic rhinitis. J Immunol. 2007;179(9):5897–906.
22. Nakano H, Gunn MD.Gene duplications at the che­mokine locus on mouse chromosome 4: multiple strain-specic haplotypes and the deletion of second­ary lymphoid-organ chemokine and EBI-1 ligand chemokine genes in the plt mutation. J Immunol. 2001;166:361–9.
23. Yamada T, Tongu M, Goda K, et al. Sublingual immunotherapy induces regulatory function of IL-10­expressing CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells of cervical lymph nodes in murine allergic rhinitis model. J Allergy. 2012;2012:490905.
24. Masuda A, Yoshikai Y, Aiba K, etal. Th2 cytokine production from mast cells is directly induced by lipopolysaccharide and distinctly regulated by c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 pathways. J Immunol. 2002;169(7):3801–10.
25. Rodriguez D, Keller AC, Faquim-Mauro EL, et al. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide signaling through toll­like receptor 4 suppresses asthma-like responses via nitric oxide synthase 2 activity. J Immunol. 2003;171(2):1001–8.
26. Aoi N, Morikura I, Fuchiwaki T, etal. OK432 admin­istration inhibits murine allergic rhinitis at the induc­tion phase, through the macrophage activation with TLR2 signaling pathway. Med Sci. 2018;6(4):107–20.
27. Belderbos M, Levy O, Bont L, Belderbos M, etal. Neonatal innate immunity in allergy development. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21(6):762–9.
28. Bortolatto J, Borducchi E, Rodriguez D, etal. Toll-like receptor 4 agonists adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide adjuvant attenuate ovalbumin-specic allergic airway disease: role of MyD88 adaptor molecule and inter­leukin- 12/interferon-gamma axis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38(10):1668–79.
29. Wang Y, McCusker. Neonatal exposure with LPS and/or allergen prevents experimental allergic air­ways disease: development of tolerance using environmental antigens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(1):143–51.
30. Aoi N, Fuchiwaki T, Morikura I, Kawauchi H, etal. Nasal administration of lipopolysaccharide exacer­bates allergic rhinitis through Th2 cytokine produc­tion from mast cells. Allergie. 2021;1(4):216–24.
The Neutrophil andChronic
https://t.me/medicina_free
Rhinosinusitis
MartinY.Desrosiers andShaunJ.Kilty
8
Core Messages
• Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex heterogeneous inammatory disease that has traditionally been characterized as primarily “eosinophilic” in nature but in which contri­butions from other cell types may lead to dif­ferent sub-phenotypes of disease.
• Neutrophils are key inammatory cells in the immune response, and while their role is less well understood in CRS, it may nevertheless be signicant.
• A better understanding of neutrophilic inam­mation in CRS could lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies for CRS.
Descriptions of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are frequently characterized by references to the eosinophilia present in CRS and in allergic dis­eases. However, the focus in the assessment of inammation in chronic rhinosinusitis is increas­ingly shifting away from Th2-dominated mecha­nisms to a consideration of the contributions by Th1 and Th17 mechanisms as well. This has led
M. Y. Desrosiers Division of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Université de Montréal/Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) Hôpitale Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
S. J. Kilty (*) Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Ottawa/The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
to an increased focus of interest in the assessment of lymphocyte subpopulations and of cytokines associated with these inammatory pathways.
Throughout this, the neutrophil, a somewhat ubiquitous inammatory cell associated with both Th1 and Th17 patterns of inammation, has been somewhat ignored. In this chapter, we review the structure and function of the neutro­phil and review evidence for its potential implica­tion in chronic rhinosinusitis.
8.1 Histologic Description
Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocyte in humans representing up to 60% of the circulating white blood cells. It is a member of the family of granulocytes, which also includes basophils and eosinophils. Neutrophils are considered an essen­tial component of the innate immune system by virtue of their multiple actions in bacterial killing and sequestration. Neutrophils cause microbial death by three means: phagocytosis, by generat­ing neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and through the release of soluble antimicrobials from their primary and specic granules [1].
Neutrophils derived their name from their dif­ferential response in staining from other granulo­cytes with hematoxylin and eosin or Wright’s Giemsa staining. Eosinophils intensely capture eosin, giving them their characteristic appearance under the microscope. The abundant azurophilic
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Ö. Ö. Celebi, T. M. Önerci (eds.), Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12386-3_8
91
92
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 8.1 Neutrophil on blood smear, Wright’s Giemsa stain. Original magnication 100× oil immersion. Note the characteristic multi-segmented nucleus and mostly lilac-staining specic (secondary) granules and a few azu­rophilic primary granules. Surrounding cells are mature erythrocytes. (Credit: Ruth F. Padmore MD, FRCPC, PhD, Ottawa, Canada)
granules of the basophils give them a bluish hue. The neutrophil is instead characterized by the neutral aspect of its cytoplasmic staining and its multiply segmented nucleus (Fig.8.1).
Neutrophils have a diameter of 12–15μm. In circulating blood, neutrophils are in a quiescent, or resting state, and have a vaguely circular form. However, when activated, the shape changes, with the cell becoming more amoeba-like, with pseudopods extending in search of antigens.
The granules present in neutrophils contain a number of substances with either bactericidal or proteolytic actions. Primary (azurophilic) gran­ules typically contain the bactericidal enzyme defensins and cationic proteins. They also con­tain proteolytic enzymes, cathepsin G, lysozyme, and myeloperoxidase. The specic (secondary) granules contain lysozyme, lactoferrin, as well as compounds involved in the formation of toxic oxygen species [2].
8.2 Hematologic Progenitors
As granulocytes, neutrophils share their origins with basophils and eosinophils. These are derived from progenitor cells in the bone mar-
M. Y. Desrosiers and S. J. Kilty
row and then differentiate through myelocytes into promyelocytes and then into the nal dif­ferentiated cell.
Neutrophils have a relatively short half-life, up to 6days. This is believed both to prevent the spread of pathogens that may parasitize within neutrophils to facilitate survival and dispersion and also to limit local tissue damage caused by the intense antibacterial activity of the neutrophil in a tissue.
8.3 Physiology andFunction
Neutrophils are principally responsible for bacte­rial killing, which they enact through a variety of mechanisms. Prior to serving this role, neutro­phils are primarily present in the circulation in an inactivated form. They then migrate into target tissues to exert their effects following activation by a variety of pro-inammatory signals.
The transit from the bloodstream to tissue begins with a process called diapedesis. This leu­kocyte extravasation process occurs when the activated neutrophil approaches the periphery of the blood vessel and then becomes attached to and migrates through the blood vessel wall in a process called diapedesis. This involves an inter­action with receptors called intracellular adhe­sion molecules (ICAMs) and various selectins and integrins.
Arrived at the site of infection, the neutrophil exerts its antibacterial action through the follow­ing mechanisms:
1. Phagocytosis and killing of pathogens.
2. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET).
3. Protease digestion through the release of
granule contents.
The activated neutrophil can phagocytose bac­teria by engulng them and killing them within the cell through the generation of toxic sub­stances. This process called the “oxidative burst” creates a high concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through a process involving NADPH oxidase activation and the creation of superoxide dismutase (SOD). Through several steps, this leads to the production of hypochlo-
8 The Neutrophil andChronic Rhinosinusitis
https://t.me/medicina_free
93
rous acid (HClO), which may be bactericidal in itself and/or lead to the activation of the neces­sary proteases [3].
More recently, a role for extracellular trap­ping and killing of bacteria by neutrophils has been described by the formation of “extracellu­lar NETs.” In this mechanism, neutrophils secrete a mesh composed of DNA and various proteins outside the neutrophil, which serves to trap and destroy bacteria (Fig. 8.2). This may also limit the propagation of infection as well. NETs which form intravascularly are responsi­ble for many of the clinical manifestations of sepsis.
The neutrophil also plays a role in limiting potentially negative effects of inammation through the secretion of various serine proteases. The most well known of these is alpha-1­antitrypsin, which serves to limit the extent of damage caused by neutrophil elastase released from granules in tissue. Individuals with low lev­els of alpha-1-antitrypsin may have inordinate responses to trauma. In smokers, this may lead to the development of emphysema.
8.4 Implication inDisease
Low levels of circulating neutrophils, or neutro­penia, may occur from genetic causes or from infectious or toxic causes, one of which the most familiar is chemotherapy. Individuals with neu­tropenia are particularly susceptible to infection by bacterial pathogens.
The neutrophil may also be involved primarily in inammatory diseases. Familial Mediterranean fever is a relapsing disorder where individuals pres­ent with bouts of acute inammation characterized by hyperthermia, arthralgia, and peritonitis. Due to a dysfunction in the MEFV gene, individuals have a reduced amount or structural malformations of a protein called pyrin which makes up part of the cytoskeleton of leukocytes. Pyrin abnormalities lead to defective inammation regulation and, sub­sequently, to inappropriate or prolonged inamma­tory activity [4]. It is a disorder not directly linked to neutrophil level, but rather to function, as described for alpha- 1- antitrypsin deciency above.
8.5 Implications inRespiratory
Disease
Fig. 8.2 Neutrophil extravasation trap (NET). In this
scanning electron microscope image, an Anthrax bacteria
(orange) is being engulfed by a single neutrophil (yellow), by the generation of a NET. (By Volker Brinkmann [CC­BY- 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)], via Wikimedia Commons)
While interest in the role of granulocytes in the development of chronic respiratory disease has principally focused on the role of the eosinophil in the pathogenesis of asthma, evidence is increasing to support the role of the neutrophil in the development of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Assessment of a large cohort of individuals with hard-to-treat asthma has identied pheno­types characterized by neutrophilic inammation in expectorated sputum. This has led to a consid­eration of neutrophilia in the pathogenesis of ste­roid resistance in asthma [5, 6].
The neutrophil has also been implicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Apart from alpha-1-antitrypsin deciency, as mentioned above, neutrophil elastase has been shown to be increased in individuals with COPD [7]. This is even more pronounced in individuals with COPD and also presents symptoms of bronchitis. Experimental evidence implicating the neutrophil