Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4473_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
42 Мб
Скачать
ab
20 Physiology andPathophysiology ofNasal Breathing
https://t.me/medicina_free
241
Flow right [ml/s]
Flow
800
600
400
200
0
18 : 00 20 : 00 22 : 00 0: 00 2 : 00 4: 00 6: 00 8: 00 10: 00 12: 00 14: 00 16: 00
Heart rate (HR) [1/min] Breathing rate (BR) [1/min] Nasal minute volume (NMV) [L/min]
HF AF
120
100
80
60
40
18 : 00 20 : 00 22 : 00 0: 00 2 : 00
Moderate
physical stress
classical type with
incomplete resting phases
4: 00 6: 00 8: 00 14: 00 16: 00
No physical stress (sleep)
classical type with
complete resting phases
Fig. 20.19 Graphical illustration of the result of a long­term rhinometric examination of a healthy subject with non-obstructed nasal breathing and the simultaneous physical activity from a study protocol. (a) During moder­ate physical stress (blue background), during sleep (green background), during moderately increased physical stress (yellow background), and during heavy physical stress
Flow left [ml/s]
Moderate
increasing
physical stress
classical type with
incomplete resting phases
and increasing flow on both sides
subject during very heavy physical stress (intensive red background). Upper Part of the gure: X-axis: time; Y-axis: Nasal airow velocity at maximal inspiration in mL/s for the right (red) and left (blue) nasal side. Lower Part of the gure: X-axis: time; Y-axis: Heart rate (HR) orange, breathing rate (AR): violet, nasal respiratory min­ute volume in mL/s (NMV): green
12: 0010: 00
Heavy physical stress
(light red background). (b) Measuring results of the same
in-Concert-Type
Flow
800
600
400
200
0
: 00 8 : 00 10 : 00 12
NMV
AF
30
20
10
0
: 00 8 : 00 10 : 00 12
Very heavy physical stress
complete mouth breathing
20.6 Conclusions
• In functional rhinosurgery, reducing patho­logical breathing resistance by expanding the
• The long-term results after functional rhino­surgery are not satisfactory. Frequently reported postoperative complaints are insuf­ciently improved nasal breathing and dry mucous membranes up to symptoms of an empty nose syndrome. One reason for this is the insufcient consideration of the physio­logical importance of structures that are essential for the respiratory function in the nose.
• In recent years, our understanding of the rela­tionship between efcient breathing and the very complex structure of the nose has increased signicantly. The transfer of this knowledge into rhinosurgical practice is not sufcient. More satisfactory long-term results should be achieved in functional rhinosurgery through a greater inclusion of physiological aspects.
nasal ow channel is an essential part. This almost always involves straightening the sep­tum in conjunction with reducing the size of the turbinates.
• When the breathing resistance is sufciently normalized, oral bypass breathing is elimi­nated and the respiratory function of the nose is reactivated.
• However, the patient is only symptom-free after surgery if the structures in the nose that are essential for its respiratory function have been preserved or reconstructed.
• If there is a physiological septal deviation, a septoplasty with turbinate reduction is not indicated as the physiological slit-shaped nasal ow channel will be broadened too much. Therefore, before a septoplasty, it should be determined whether the existing deviation is causing the pathological skeletal
242
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. G. Beule et al.
resistance or whether it is a physiological deviation. In the latter case, the real reason for the patient’s discomfort should be identied (e.g. narrowing of the isthmus with pathologi­cal valve collapse, sagging nose, etc.) and corrected.
• Correction of the septum is required in the event of pathological deviations. However, the septum should not be fully straightened. It should be placed in the middle between the asymmetrical lateral nasal walls so that the cavum is approximately the same size on both sides. This is an important requirement for an undisturbed nasal cycle and thereby for the respiratory function.
• The slit-shaped cavum should be sufciently wide on both sides of the nose so that the inhaled air can ow unhindered for the work­ing phase after decongestion. For the resting phase, the nose should not be too wide so that it can be closed by swelling. Both are prereq­uisites for an undisturbed nasal cycle.
• With their shape and size, the turbinates con­tribute signicantly to the narrowing of the cavum to a slit-shaped ow channel. With their cavernous bodies and the respiratory mucosa, the turbinates are important struc­tures for the respiratory function of the nose. For these reasons, the turbinates should be preserved as much as possible.
• In cases in which the turbinates are enlarged for compensatory reasons (e.g. to narrow a cavum that is too wide on the concave side of the deviation), septoplasty should not be routinely combined with surgical reduction of the turbinate size. In these cases, it is important to distinguish between turbinate enlargement due to swelling or hyperplasia by also performing an examination after decongestion.
• When treating the compensatory swelling of turbinates, resections are seldom necessary, since the turbinates can adapt with the extent of their swelling in shape and size to the avail­able space.
• In pre-pubertal septal deviations, it is often observed that the turbinate has grown far medially in the area of the concave deviated
septum. In these cases, a lateral positioning of the lower turbinate in the region of septal deviation is indicated in order to create a sym­metrical slit-shaped channel.
• The reconstruction of the inow area requires special attention. With drooping noses, the alar cartilage should be rotated and xed up to a normal nasolabial angle. This restores an even distribution of the airow over the entire cross section in the turbinate region. From a functional point of view, no overcorrection should be made.
– If the valve angle is too small or too large
(tension and saddle noses), the height of the septum in the cartilaginous nose should be normalized. Therewith, the nozzle effect of the nasal vestibulum also normalizes.
– During the operation of crooked noses, the
diffusers in both nasal sides should be reconstructed as symmetrically as possible, because that is an important prerequisite for regulating turbulence during the nasal cycle.
– If possible, the head of the lower turbinate
should not be reduced because of its func­tion in regulating turbulence. If necessary, a lateral positioning is often sufcient.
References
1. Beule AG.Physiology and pathophysiology of respi­ratory mucosa of the nose and the paranasal sinuses. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;9:Doc07.
2. Mink P. Physiologie der oberen Luftwege. Leipzig: Vogel; 1920.
3. Paulsen E.Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Strömung der Luft in der Nasenhöhle. Sonderber D Akad d Wiss Wien. 1882;85:352–73.
4. Kayser R. Über den Weg der Atemluft durch die Nase. Z Ohrenheilk. 1889;20:96–109.
5. Rethi L. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Luftströmung in der normalen Nase sowie bei pathologischen Veränderungen derselben und des Nasenrachenraumes. Sonderber D Akad d Wiss Wien. 1900;109:17–36.
6. Burchardt. Die Luftströmung in der Nase unter pathologischen Verhältnissen. Arch Laryng. 1905;17:123–46.
7. Hellmann K. Untersuchungen über die Nase als Luftweg. Z Hals-Nas-Ohr-Heilk. 1926;15:354–7.
20 Physiology andPathophysiology ofNasal Breathing
https://t.me/medicina_free
243
8. Takahashi K. Vorläuge Mitteilung über die Erforschung des Luftweges in der Nase des Menschen. Z Laryng Rhinol. 1922;11:203.
9. Der TJ.Weg der Atemluft in der menschlichen Nase. Arch Ohr- Nas-u Kehlk-Heilk. 1939;146:41–63.
10. Masing H.Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Strömungsverlauf im Nasenmodell. Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilk. 1967;189:371–81.
11. Fischer R.Die Physik der Atemströmung in der Nase. Berlin: FU Berlin; 1969.
12. Bachmann W.Die Funktionsdiagnostik der behinder­ten Nasenatmung. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer; 1982.
13. Bachmann W. Diagnostik der behinderten Nasenatmung: Teil 1: Funktionelle Anatomie und Strömungsphysik. HNO Aktuell. 1982;4:34–8.
14. Naito K, Iwata S, Kondo M, Ohoka E.Human respi­ratory airow through an articial nasal model: pressure/ow relationship. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1989;16(2):89–97.
15. Hess MM, Lamprecht J, Horlitz S. Experimentelle Untersuchung der Strombahnen in der Nasenhaupthöhle des Menschen am Nasen-Modell. Laryngorhinootologie. 1992;71(9):468–71.
16. Simmen D, Scherrer JL, Moe K, Heinz B.A dynamic and direct visualization model for the study of nasal airow. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(9):1015–21.
17. Mlynski G, Low J. Die Rhinoresistometrie-­eine Weiterentwicklung der Rhinomanometrie. Laryngorhinootologie. 1993;72(12):608–10.
18. Grutzenmacher S, Robinson DM, Grafe K, Lang C, Mlynski G.First ndings concerning airow in noses with septal deviation and compensatory turbinate hypertrophy--a model study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68(4):199–205.
19. Grutzenmacher S, Robinson DM, Lang C, Lebe E, Knape U, Mlynski G. Investigations of the influence of external nose deformities on nasal airflow. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2005;67(3):154–9.
20. Mlynski G, Grutzenmacher S, Plontke S, Mlynski B, Lang C.Correlation of nasal morphology and respira­tory function. Rhinology. 2001;39(4):197–201.
21. Mlynski G. Aerodynamik der Nase-Physiologie und Pathophysiologie. HNO-Praxis Heute. 2000;20:61–81.
22. Mlynski G.A method for studying nasal airow by means of uid dynamic experiments. Z Med Phys. 2000;10:207–14.
23. Bergmark RW, Gray ST. Surgical Management of Turbinate Hypertrophy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2018;51(5):919–28.
24. Sommer F, Lindemann J, Scheithauer MO, Hoffmann TK, Veit JA. Nasal turbinate surgery. HNO. 2017;65(5):443–56.
25. Dishoeck H. Inspiratory nasal resistance. Acta Otolaryngol. 1942;30:431–9.
26. Mlynski G, Pirsig W. Funktionell ästhetische Rhinochirurgie unter Berücksichtigung physiolo-
gischer Aspekte. Stuttgart/New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2018.
27. Zuckerkandl E.Normale und pathologische Anatomie der Nase und ihrer pneumatischen Anhänge. Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller; 1882.
28. Altissimi G, Gallucci L, Simoncelli C. Positional rhinomanometry in hypertrophic vasomotor chronic rhinitis: considerations before and after functional surgery of turbinates. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1992;12(4):363–9.
29. Hanif J, Jawad SS, Eccles R.A study to assess the usefulness of a portable spirometer to quantify the severity of nasal septal deviation. Rhinology. 2003;41(1):11–5.
30. Podoshin L, Gertner R, Fradis M, Berger A.Incidence and treatment of deviation of nasal septum in new­borns. Ear Nose Throat J. 1991;70(8):485–7.
31. Sooknundun M, Deka RC, Kacker SK, Verma IC.Nasal septal deviation at birth and its diagnosis. Indian J Pediatr. 1986;53(1):105–8.
32. Uygur K, Yariktas M, Tuz M, Döner F, Ozgan A.The incidence of septal deviation in newborns. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2002;9:117–20.
33. Gola R, Cheynet F, Guyot L, Bellot-Samson V, Richard O.Traumatismes du nez perinataux et de la petite enfance. Etiopathogenie, consequences et prin­cipes therapeutiques. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2002;103(1):41–55.
34. Gogniashvilli G, Steinmeier E, Mlynski G, Beule AG. Physiologic and pathologic septal deviations: subjective and objective functional rhinologic nd­ings. Rhinology. 2011;49(1):24–9.
35. Kim DH, Park HY, Kim HS, Kang SO, Park JS, Han NS, etal. Effect of septoplasty on inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(4):419–23.
36. Mlynski G. Restorative procedures in disturbed function of the upper airways—nasal breathing. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;4:Doc07.
37. Toyserkani NM, Frisch T. Are too many septal deviations operated on? A retrospective patient’s satisfaction questionnaire with 11 years follow-up. Rhinology. 2012;50(2):185–90.
38. Sundh C, Sunnergren O. Long-term symptom relief after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(10):2871–5.
39. Valsamidis K, Titelis K, Rachovitsas D, Konstantinidis I, Markou K, Triaridis S. Long-term evaluation of nasal septoplasty followed by inferior turbinate cauterization for the treatment of nasal obstruction using objective and subjective methods. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;22(3):284–90.
40. Stoksted P.Long term results, following plastic sep­tum surgery. Int Rhinol. 1969;7:53–61.
41. Dommerby H, Rasmussen OR, Rosborg J. Long­term results of septoplastic operations. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1985;47(3):151–7.
42. Haraldsson PO, Nordemar H, Anggard A.Long-term results after septal surgery--submucous resection ver-
244
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. G. Beule et al.
sus septoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1987;49(4):218–22.
43. Grymer L, Rosborg J. The aging nose (long-term results following plastic septal surgery). J Laryngol Otol. 1987;101:363–5.
44. Fjermedal O, Saunte C, Pedersen S.Septoplasty and/ or submucous resection? 5 years nasal septum opera­tions. J Laryngol Otol. 1988;102:796–8.
45. Illum P. Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: long-term results after ran­domized turbinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254(Suppl 1):S89–92.
46. Dinis PB, Haider H. Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23(2):85–90.
47. Mlynski G.Surgery of the nasal septum. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(4):223–9.
48. Kayser R. Die exakte Messung der Luftdurchgängigkeit der Nase. Arch Laryng Rhinol (Berl). 1895;8
49. Cole P, Chaban R, Naito K, Oprysk D.The obstruc­tive nasal septum. Effect of simulated deviations on nasal airow resistance. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(4):410–2.
50. Lang C, Grutzenmacher S, Mlynski B, Plontke S, Mlynski G.Investigating the nasal cycle using endos­copy, rhinoresistometry, and acoustic rhinometry. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(2):284–9.
51. Kim JK, Yoon JH, Kim CH, Nam TW, Shim DB, Shin HA. Particle image velocimetry measurements for the study of nasal airow. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126(3):282–7.
52. Braun T, Rich M, Berghaus A, Kramer MF. Effects of oxymetazoline nasal spray on the nasal cycle assessed by long-term rhinoowmetry. Rhinology. 2012;50(4):370–5.
53. Rohrmeier C, Schittek S, Ettl T, Herzog M, Kuehnel TS. The nasal cycle during wakefulness and sleep and its relation to body position. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(6):1492–7.
Function oftheTurbinates:
https://t.me/medicina_free
Nasal Cycle
AchimG.Beule andRainerK.Weber
21
Core Messages
• Spontaneous changes in nasal airway resistance in the two separate nasal passages due to conges­tion and decongestion of nasal venous sinuses are called the nasal cycle. One respiratory function of the nose is to sufciently condition the respirated air which goes along with the nasal cycle.
• It is important to consider the nasal cycle and other physiologic changes in the congestion of the nasal mucosa when making a clinical assessment of a patient complaining of nasal obstruction. The indication faor surgery should be based on clinical history, on exami­nation by anterior rhinoscopy and nasal endos­copy, and by considering these physiologic variations in addition to measurements of nasal airway patency. Long-term rhinoowm­etry offers a new possibility for investigating nasal patency for up to 72h.
A. G. Beule Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany e-mail: achimgeorg.beule@ukmuenster.de
R. K. Weber (*) Department of Otolaryngology, Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
Sinus Academy, Karlsruhe, Germany e-mail: rainerweber@rainerweber.de
21.1 Denition ofNasal Cycle
The respiratory function of the nose is to suf­ciently condition the respirated air, which is maintained by supplying the mucosa with ther­mal energy and uid for humidication. This is supplied by blood circulation and in coherence with the nasal cycle [1]. The erectile tissue enables the turbinates to cyclically congest and decongest. We distinguish between three differ­ent patterns of congestion and decongestion during the nasal cycle: During the classical nasal cycle, one side of the nose is in its working phase conditioning the air, with an unimpeded air passage and increased turbulence. At the same time, the contralateral side is in its resting phase, saving energy and moisture by high air­way resistance and low turbulence [2]. This type of nasal cycle is the physiologic ideal, enabling the resting side to regain the full mucosal poten­tial to clean and humidify the air during the next cycle. In cases of increased physical activity or decreased respiratory function of the nose, a decongestion on both sides can be observed, called the in- concert- type or parallel type [3]. If the erectile tissue is severely malfunctioning, e.g. after excessive resection or due to atypical central nervous impulses to the erectile tissue, the congestion on both sides is irregular. Congestion and decongestion are no longer responsive to the physical or respiratory activity of the subject and the duration of a congestive
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 Ö. Ö. Celebi, T. M. Önerci (eds.), Nasal Physiology and Pathophysiology of Nasal Disorders,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12386-3_21
245
246
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. G. Beule and R. K. Weber
phase is less than 30min. to correctly attribute this term. Some authors suggest the use of the term acyclic; however, this fourth type I up to now is rarely used in the literature. To under­stand the possible inuencing factors resulting in one of these three types, the regulation of the nose needs to be remembered:
The airow through the nose is regulated by
the activity of the erectile venous tissue of the nasal mucosa [4]. The nasal epithelium has a very complex vascular nature with a submucosal plexus of venous sinuses lining the nasal mucosa. These venous sinuses from erectile tissue are well developed in the anterior part of the nasal septum and the inferior turbinate [5]. These sub­mucosal cushions of the venous sinuses expand and shrink depending on the degree of conges­tion, hence altering the calibre of the nasal pas­sages and inuencing the nasal airow.
An enlargement of this tissue leads to a reduc-
tion of the nasal lumen and increases the ow resistance. The cyclic congestion and deconges­tion of the nasal mucosa is called nasal cycle [4] and is observed in about 80% of the people [6, 7], and only about 20–40% seem to show a classical type [3, 6, 8, 9]. As the nasal cycle had already been described by Kayser in 1895 [9], the nasal cycle was investigated using several techniques, including rhinoscopy [9, 10], acoustic rhinome­try [2, 1120], rhinomanometry [2126], rhino­resistometry [2], radiologic tomographic imaging [27], computed tomography [28], or magnetic resonance imaging [2932].
Rhinomanometry reveals an opposite swelling
behaviour of both nasal sides, while the total resistance of the two nasal sides, the nasal pas­sage, and the respiratory work remain relatively constant [8, 25, 26, 33, 34].
Magnetic resonance imaging could show that
even the ethmoid mucosa is involved in the nasal cycle, however, only to a lower degree [30]. Also the tubal function changes with the nasal passage resistance in a homolaterally con­cordant way [35].
By means of radiologic tomographic proce-
dures, Masing [27] could show that in cases of nasal obstruction or non-existing nasal breathing, the classic nasal cycle can no longer be observed
but paradox or irregular turbinate movements occur, which conrms the observations made by others [3, 23, 25, 26]. In the anterior and poste­rior parts of the nose, the changes were compa­rable so that the hydraulic diameter of the whole nose seemed to be equally maintained. In cases of signicant septal deviation, in-concert or no nasal cycle could be found. In only two of six cases, a unilateral turbinate movement was observed on the obstructed side. The nasal cycle stopped with the beginning of acute rhinitis [27] and may be abolished by use of topical deconges­tants [36].
Rhinoresistometry and acoustic rhinometry could reveal the changes of the nasal turbulence occurring in the context of the nasal cycle [2]. During the resting phase, a laminar airow was observed. During the working phase (decon­gested side), turbulences were also found with low speed. The increasing turbulence was caused by an increased cross-section surface of the ante­rior nasal area. Hereby, the turbinates and the mucosa of the nasal septum are decongested.
Long-term rhinoowmetry is a complemen­tary tool in addition to established rhinological diagnostics. The nasal ow can be investigated up to 72h. Therefore, it appears to be an ideal tool to measure the cyclic alterations of the nasal cycle [1]. Technical details have been published for commercially independent reports on its function [37]. Long-term rhinoowmetry is espe­cially helpful if nasal obstruction is reported dur­ing nighttime or in specic environment to objectify these complaints [38].
Keerl etal. [39] were the rst to realize visu­alization by means of nasal endoscopy and dynamic description with timelapse video. In analogy to the clinical and rhinomanometric observations that the total resistance of both nasal sides is almost constant [8, 20, 33, 40], the congestive procedures on one side occur nearly parallel to the decongestive procedures of the contralateral side (Fig. 21.1a–e). Most of the time, continuous swelling patterns are found with congestion of one side and decongestion of the contralateral side. These swelling changes are relatively rapid with 15min in our analysis for a cyclic duration of 5h.
21 Function oftheTurbinates: Nasal Cycle
https://t.me/medicina_free
a
b
c
247
d
Fig. 21.1 (a–e) Swelling of inferior turbinate according to the nasal cycle in a healthy young man (parallel endos­copy using a 0° endoscope): (a) Decongested mucosa on the right and congested mucosa on the left side at the
beginning. (b) Change of swelling. (c) Maximal conges­tion on the right and maximal decongested mucosa on the left side. (d) Reciprocal change of swelling. (e) Same situ­ation at the end of the nasal cycle as at the beginning
248
https://t.me/medicina_free
e
Fig. 21.1 (continued)
A. G. Beule and R. K. Weber
With the endoscopic description in timelapse video, the extent of the congesting process could be evaluated precisely. The process of congestion and decongestion occurs relatively rapidly so that the turbinates remain most of the time in a kind of plateau phase of submaximal to maximal conges­tion or decongestion. Based on our clinical evalu­ations in healthy subjects, most of the nasal cycle changes occur within 5min. The size of the turbi­nates varies between very small and very large with complete obstruction of the nasal cavity in the visible area. During the course of the cycle, complete decongestion of both turbinates never occurred. For a short phase, a similar middle con­gestion status of both turbinates can be found.
The diagnosis of hyperplastic turbinates is often made in the clinical routine, but with the background of the mentioned results, it must be reconsidered. Hyperplasia means rst the enlargement of tissue by cellular multiplication. During the nasal cycle, the healthy turbinate con­tinuously changes from a low to a high degree of congestion. Internal and external factors addi­tionally inuence the extent of the swelling situ­ation. As the physiology of a normal turbinate allows each size from minimal to maximal, there is no reference for the diagnosis of hyperplasia or hypertrophy or for denition of a standard nor­mal size at one given time point. Even if one side of the nose is completely obstructed because of the maximally congested inferior turbinate, the other decongested side allows a sufcient nasal air passage based on the physiologic nasal cycle due to the relatively unchanged total nasal resis­tance of the nose. Only the bilateral massive swelling of the inferior turbinates seems to be
unphysiological [39, 41]. It seems to be appropri­ate demanding to limit the use of the term of hyperplasia only for enlarged turbinates with atypical changes of the surface (e.g. polypous, mulberry-like changes) and to speak about con­gested turbinates in all other cases.
Besides the congesting and decongesting pro­cesses, regular changes of the secretory produc­tion could be observed endoscopically [3, 41,
42]. The congesting turbinate seemed to become
increasingly humid so that maximally congested situation led to small droplets. Reason is the acti­vation of the parasympathic nervous system. During the decongesting phase, the mucosa dries more and more, partly with resulting small dry layers. In this context, the dehydrating effect of nasal breathing accompanies the sympathomi­metic and reduced parasympathic tonus. However, in cases of rhinitis, the interaction of secretory function and nasal cycle has been shown to be affected as well [3].
21.2 Types ofNasal Cycles
Three types of nasal cycles are described [1]: the classical reciprocal type, the in-concert type (simultaneous reduction and increasing of the nasal passage on both sides), and the irregular type. Recently, the term acyclic nose has been introduced [3, 6].
In addition, Kern [43] describes three types of non-cycle noses: there is no uctuation of the nasal passage, the uctuation is moderate only on one side, and the uctuation does not change from one side to the other.
21 Function oftheTurbinates: Nasal Cycle
https://t.me/medicina_free
249
The cyclic duration is very variable with an interval of about 1–6h [4, 8, 10, 39, 41] but use of rhinoowmetry has demonstrated that cyclic duration may take up to 11h [36, 38, 44].
More recent quantitative studies using numer­ical parameters seem to show that true periodicity and reciprocity of nasal airow exist only in 21–39% of the population, reciprocity being the truly reciprocal changes in airow between right and left passages and periodicity being the regu­larity of changes in airow occurring with time in each nasal passage. Otherwise, these studies used measurement periods no longer than 8h. So the timeperiod of examination may be too short to discover the nasal cycle as was outlined by Grützenmacher.
To characterize the nasal cycle apart from its type, duration of the working or resting phase, as well as the magnitude of maximal nasal ow, called amplitude, is currently evaluated [38]. These parameters may also be expressed as ratio of both nasal sides, as calibration and normaliza­tion of the measurement used are still challeng­ing. Recently, a more similar distribution of nasal cycle measured by rhinoowmetry has been reported after septoplasty in comparison to a pre­operative measurement [45].
Also in children, a nasal cycle can be revealed [16, 4648]. For children up to the age of 6, it amounts to a mean of 1h and 20min and is not inuenced by physical activity. Even infections do not signicantly inuence the nasal cycle. As studies with a longer observation time are still not available (possibly due to ethical consider­ation), these ndings may be controversially discussed.
Even if the distribution of the nasal cycle types changes, a uctuation of the nasal passage is found in laryngectomized patients (25% classical type, 40% irregular type, 35% in-concert type) [14].
According to Ingels etal. [49], no correlation is found between the ciliary beating rate (CBR) of the nasal epithelia and the rhinomanometri­cally measured passage of the nasal cavity. The CBR of different cells in the same biopsies was clearly different.
In contrast to this, Doyle and van Cauwenberge [50] could detect a higher mucociliary clearance
rate with increased nasal passage by means of the saccharin test. Also Soane etal. [51] found a sig­nicant acceleration of the mucociliary clearance on the free side in comparison to the obstructed nasal side with a factor of 2.5:1 using the gamma scintigraphy.
21.2.1 Pearls
• Spontaneous changes in nasal airway resis­tance due to congestion and decongestion of nasal venous sinuses are called nasal cycle.
• Three types of nasal cycles are described with a duration of about 1–11h.
• Consider the nasal cycle and other physiologic changes in the congestion of the nasal mucosa when making a clinical assessment of a patient complaining of nasal obstruction.
• Long-term rhinoowmetry offers a new pos­sibility for investigating nasal patency for up to 72h.
21.3 Origin, Function,
andRegulation oftheNasal Cycle
Finally, the origin and the function of the nasal cycle are still under scientic discussion: As rst suggested by Mlynski [52] and subsequently rened [38, 44, 53], the decongested side is in the working phase of the nose [1]. The respirated air passes through the decongested nasal side; the air is conditioned, i.e. warmed up, moistured, and cleaned. The congested side is in its resting phase.
The regulation of the nasal cycle is probably
performed by the central sympathomimetic tonus [4, 5, 5458]. This tonus is controlled by two centres in the brain stem. They are connected and dominate the tonus via right and left cervical sympathomimetic nerve bres nally asymmetri­cally. Consequently, medical conditions affecting this central nervous function of pace making may be detected via the nasal cycle [54, 55].
Changes in the nasal patency that are related
to positional changes may be explained by two
250
https://t.me/medicina_free
A. G. Beule and R. K. Weber
different mechanisms: an increased central venous pressure when changing from a standing to a lying position and a reectory change of the nasal vasomotoric tonus when a lateral lying position is taken. The increase of the venous pressure causes an increased lling of the nasal venous sinusoids and an increase in the nasal resistance. The passive hydrostatic effect adds to each asymmetry in the context of the nasal cycle. The side with the highest degree of congestion generally has the highest increase of swelling and is completely obstructed [59]. Lying down leads to a temporary disturbance of the nasal cycle with congestion of the mucosa and increased ow resistance. This effect is especially pronounced in the bottom nasal side and mediated via tho­racic receptors [60, 61] or those in the area of the axilla [62]. The amplitudes of the changes in the resistance in the nasal cycle are higher in supine and lateral position [59, 61, 63, 64].
The reciprocal changes of the nasal patency when taking a lateral lying position are induced by the pressure in the area of the shoulder girdle, the lateral thorax, and the hip that are the most sensitive regions. During local anaesthesia in the area of the skin, surface of the axilla cannot sup­press this reectory reaction; this is possible by an intercostal neural blockade [64]. This leads to the effect that the upper side of the nose is mainly open for nasal passage. An explanation may be that this avoids closure of the inferior side of the nose when lying on the ground so that nasal breathing is still possible.
The diagnosis of nasal obstruction and the nasal patency have to bear in mind the physio­logic nasal cycle as well as changes of the nasal respiratory resistance in dependence of the sur­rounding conditions (temperature, probably humidity, irritating substances) [53, 65], the physical activity, body position [61, 66], or phar­macological inuences [36, 67, 68].
Physical activity leads to a reduced nasal resistance [28, 38, 44, 66, 69]. According to some studies, the nasal resistance mostly increases with cold temperatures [65, 70]. Schlegel [71] reports about the main decrease of the resistance with cold temperatures and an increase with
warmth. The change of the humidity from 20% to more than 90% has no inuence on the nasal patency [70].
The nasal cycle may inuence the nasal allergy provocation test [7274]. Gotlib etal. [73,
75] found that the determination of the bilateral
reduction of the cross-section surface in the area of the inferior turbinates is more sensitive than the determination of the one of the more reactive side. However, the risk of a spontaneous unilat­eral total increase of the nasal resistance must be considered.
There is some evidence that the nasal cycle is associated with ultradian rhythms of the cerebral hemispheres which affect cognitive function of the brain [57, 7678]. This includes atypical ndings during psychiatric conditions including hallucinations [77, 79]. Alternating dominance of cerebral hemispheric activity can be demon­strated in humans by EEG, and relative changes in electro-cortical activity seem to have a direct correlation with the nasal cycle [7981]. These studies found a greater EEG activity on the side contralateral to the decongested side of the nose; a signicant improvement in spatial and verbal cognitive function performed by the contralat­eral (in females) and ipsilateral (in males) cere­bral hemisphere occurred in unilateral forced nasal breathing [57, 76]. This may explain why some patients with nasal obstruction nd this more than just a simple annoyance and may develop medical indication to normalize the nasal cycle using rhinosurgery. The nasal obstruction may have effects on the ability to work during daytime [5].
Patients with upper respiratory tract infections become far more apparent with a signicant increase in the amplitude of the changes than healthy people [82].
As physical activity decreases signicantly during sleep, long-term rhinoowmetry enables to detect a more regular or classical type of nasal cycle during night. Currently, it is discussed whether this is an indicator of increased individ­ual resistance or respiratory malfunctioning of the nose and possible indication for surgical correction.