Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_794_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
43 Мб
Скачать
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Section I • General Principles
Sealers including PK dissecting forceps, Vessel Sealer
-
Staplers
-
Clip applier
-
b) Straight instruments designed specically for robotic surgery:
Harmonic scalpel
-
Suction/irrigator
-
Fluorescence imaging
-
c) Laparoscopic instruments used through an assistant port:
Graspers
-
Retractors
-
Suction
-
Staplers
-
Ultrasound probe
-
d) Instruments used percutaneously:
Sutures for retraction
-
Ablation devices
-
Biopsy devices
-
Contingency Plans for Emergency Conversion
One concern in robotic surgery is making an emergency conversion to an open procedure if severe hemorrhage occurs. It generally will take longer to convert to open surgery from robotic than lapa­roscopic surgery, because (1) the robot is docked and is an obstacle to conversion, (2) the primary surgeon is not at the surgical table, (3) anesthesia personnel are generally more remote from the patient, and (4) the open surgical instrumentation may not be nearby and is not open for use.
Having a contingency plan for conversion to an open procedure increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome. Implementing and rehearsing such a plan is essential. Having a “Robotic Emergency Timeout” as part of every robotic case ensures availability of emergency instruments and blood products and that all personnel involved understand the plan for emergency conversion and their role in the process.
ere should be an instrument set available for emergency conversion that should include
-
standard open surgical instruments and vascular surgical instruments.
ere should be self-retaining retractors available to provide exposure such as a ompson
-
or Goligher retractor.
ere should be a list of standard vascular sutures and staplers that are made immediately
-
available.
In cases in which hemorrhage is likely, consideration should be given to placing a gel port at
-
the start of the operation to allow for rapid, manual tamponade of bleeding. Such a gel port
insertion site can be used for specimen extraction.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Emergency Conversion Timeout should be performed at the beginning of each robotic surgical case, and should include the following elements:
Delineation of personnel responsibility including who will maintain tamponade, perform
-
resuscitation, undock the robot, and make the open incision.
Check to be sure emergency conversion instruments, retractors, vascular sutures, and sta-
-
plers are readily available or in the room.
Check that necessary blood products for potential resuscitation are available.
-
List other personnel who may be called to assist in an emergency such as vascular surgeons.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic
In the past two decades, laparoscopic surgery has transformed modern surgery dramatically. Nu­merous studies have shown these techniques to have resulted in decreased length of hospital stays, im
proved postoperative pain, better postoperative immune function resulting in fewer surgical infec­tions, and improved cosmetic results when compared with similar open procedures. For these reasons minimally invasive techniques have become accepted by surgeons, patients, and insurance companies.
Chapter  • Introduction to Robotic Surgery
within the abdominal cavity and surgeons are forced to watch a two-dimensional video repre­sentation of a three-dimensional operative eld. In addition laparoscopic instruments provide surgeons with decreased haptic feedback and poor ergonomics. ese limitations make complex dissections and anastomosis dicult. ere is also a substantial learning curve to develop and maintain advanced laparoscopic skills. e shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery were the driving force behind the development of robotic surgery.
scopic procedures with greater ease and less technical training. e robot’s articulating instruments allow laparoscopic instruments to move with handlike motions. Performing delicate dissection and intracorporeal suturing is made possible by the steady camera platform, three-dimensional imaging, resting tremor ltration, the removal of tremor and motion artifact, and comfortable ergonomics provided for the surgeon. e signicant advantages of robotic surgery are expanding the scope of surgical procedures being performed through minimally invasive techniques. e robot, however, as currently designed, provides much less haptic feedback to the surgeon because of the computer interface between the surgeon’s hands and the patient. Visual experience with tension and force during formal laparoscopy is essential for the robotic surgeon.

Nevertheless laparoscopic surgery has limitations. ere is a decreased freedom of movement
Unlike laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery allows surgeons to perform advanced laparo-
. Table7.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery
Open Surgery Laparoscopic Surgery Robotic Surgery
Advantages Long track record Well-developed technol-
Most aordable Widely deployed Improved dexterity
Easy control of bleeding Proven indications Tools with multi-degrees
Easy sewing Established teaching/cre-
Disadvantages Large incision Loss of touch sensation Loss of touch sensation
Evaporative losses Fulcrum eect Very expensive
Divided cutaneous nerves Expensive High start-up cost
Compromised muscular function
Compromised post-op respiratory function
Tricks of the Senior Surgeon
Transcutaneous sutures may be used to retract various organs and minimize the number of
-
ports required.
Using a smoke evacuator is very helpful in cases in which many energy devices are used for
-
hemostasis and maintains the advantages of clear, three-dimensional vision.
“Port in port” and “port in gel port” strategies allow exibility of use of alternating between
-
robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation while minimizing number of ports.
Drop-in ultrasonography probes allow facile delineation of target lesions and may mitigate
-
the loss in tactile sensation.
Use of a skilled assistant can be crucial for exposure.
-
ogy
dentialing
Amplied tremor Learning curve
Dicult sewing Training and creden-
3D visualization
of freedom
Elimination of fulcrum eect
Elimination of tremors
Adjustable scaling
Telesurgery
Ergonomic
Requires skilled assistant Unproven benet
tialing not uniform Dicult emergency conversions
Esophagus, Stomach,
and Duodenum
Jakob R. Izbicki, Michael G. Sarr
Chapter 8 Introduction: Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum – 57
Jakob Izbicki, Michael G. Sarr
Chapter 9 Cervical Esophagectomy – 59
Rainer Schmelzle, Phillip Pohlenz
Chapter 10 Left Thoracoabdominal Approach for Carcinoma
of the Lower Esophagus and Gastric Cardia – 67
Shoji Natsugoe, Takashi Aikou

II
Chapter 11 Subtotal Esophagectomy: Transhiatal Approach – 75
Matthias Reeh, Emre F. Yekebas, Jakob R. Izbicki
Chapter 12 Subtotal Esophagectomy: Abdominothoracic Approach – 89
Michael F. Nentwich, Asad Kutup
Chapter 13 Laparoscopic and Conventional Limited
Resection of the Gastroesophageal Junction with Isoperistaltic Jejunal Interposition – 99
orsten Dohrmann, Oliver Mann, Jacob R. Izbicki
Chapter 14 Three-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer – 107
Takashi Aikou
Chapter 15 Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy – 113
Jonathan D’Cunha, David D. Odell, Ryan M. Levy, James D. Luketich
Chapter 16 Treatment of Zenker Diverticulum – 129
Yogesh Vashist, Stefan Groth, Uwe Seitz
Chapter 17 Epiphrenic Diverticula – 137
Chris G. Collins
Chapter 18 Techniques of Local Esophagoplasty in
Short Esophageal Strictures – 145
Asad Kutup, Emre F. Yekebas, Jakob R. Izbicki
Chapter 19 Operation for Achalasia – 149
Luigi Bonavina, Alberto Peracchia
Chapter 20 Subtotal Gastrectomy, Antrectomy, BillrothII,
and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction and Local Excision in Complicated Gastric Ulcers – 153
Dean Bogoevski, Enrique Moreno Gonzalez, Carmelo Loinaz, Dr. Reeh Matthias
Chapter 21 Total Gastrectomy with Conventional
Lymphadenectomy – 169
Jürg Metzger
Chapter 22 Total Gastrectomy with Radical Systemic
Lymphadenectomy (Classic Japanese Style D2) – 183
Mitsuru Sasako
Chapter 23 Abdominothoracic Esophagogastrectomy – 191
Enrique Moreno-Gonzalez, Carmelo Loinaz, Carlos Jiménez-Romero
Chapter 24 Abdominothoracic Esophagohemigastrectomy – 209
Michael F. Nentwich, Dean Bogoevski
Chapter 25 Transhiatal Esophagohemigastrectomy – 215
Dean Bogoevski, Jakob R. Izbicki
Chapter 26 Extended Gastrectomy – 233
Asad Kutup, Jakob R. Izbicki
Chapter 27 Laparoscopic Gastrectomy – 239
Geert Kazemier
Chapter 28 Laparoscopic and Conventional Gastroenterostomy – 247
John Tsiaoussis; Gregory G. Tsiotos
Chapter 29 Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy – 255
Eleazer Yousefzadeh, Capecomorin S. Pitchumoni
Chapter 30 Conventional and Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrostomy – 261
Nathaniel Melling, Oliver Mann
Chapter 31 Fundoplication for GERD: Laparoscopic Approach – 269
Nathaniel J. Soper
Chapter 32 Operation for GERD: Conventional Approach – 277
Chapter Directory-1_Part
Chapter 33 Operation for Paraesophageal Hernia – 283
Chapter 34 Management of the Duodenal Stump – 291
Chapter 35 Operations for Morbid Obesity – 295
Chapter 36 Pancreas-Sparing Duodenectomy – 315
Chapter 37 Robotic Gastrectomy and D2Lymphadenectomy – 321
Karim A. Gawad, Alexandra M. König
Jean-Marie Michel, Lucas Krähenbühl
Yogesh K. Vashist, Florian Gebauer, Jakob R. Izbicki
Stefan Wolter, Jakob R. Izbicki, Oliver Mann, Markus Weber, Markus K. Müller, Michael G. Sarr
Maximilian Bockhorn, Michael G. Sarr
Woo Jin Hyung, Yanghee Woo
Chapter 38 Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive
Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Ivor Lewis – 331
Inderpal S. Sarkaria, Nabil P. Rizk

Introduction: Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum

Jakob Izbicki, Michael G. Sarr
is section presents the ambitious eld of open and laparoscopic surgery in benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum.
Attempts to treat esophageal cancer surgically emerged at the beginning of the twentieth century. Torek successfully resected the thoracic esophagus in 1913, but real progress came as a result of the development of thoracic surgery during and aer the Second World War. e concept of extensive lymph node resection in combination with en bloc esophagectomy was proposed by Logan in 1963 but with considerable morbidity and mortality.
Surgical procedures, pre- and postoperative management and treatment, and prognosis aer surgical treatment have improved considerably in the past three decades. Expertise of the surgeon and the institution, patient selection, choice and radicality of operation, and pre- and postopera­tive care are the most important parameters for outcome.
For this reason, the rst eight chapters present a comprehensive survey of the dierent open and laparoscopic surgical procedures, indications, and choice of operation in esophageal cancer. ey give clear guidelines as to how and when to operate with regard to the biological charac­teristics of the tumor. e focus then turns to benign esophageal diseases such as diverticula, strictures, and achalasia.
e following chapters address the techniques of subtotal, total gastric resections in benign and malignant diseases, respectively. Four chapters then outline the open and laparoscopic strategies in the case of palliation such as gastroenterostomy and gastrostomy. Next the laparoscopic proce­dure is described as the gold standard for gastroesophageal reux, and then the open approach is covered followed by dierent laparoscopic techniques for hiatal repair in paraesophageal hernia. Another chapter comprehensively covers the available strategies for morbid obesity, and the last chapter in the section deals with the ambitious pancreas-sparing duodenectomy.
e section has been prepared by experts in their surgical elds, and we hope that it will provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of current surgical standards for the various procedures.

P.-A. Clavien, M. G. Sarr, Y. Fong, M. Miyazaki (Eds.), Atlas of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surger y, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46546-2_8, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Cervical Esophagectomy

Rainer Schmelzle, Phillip Pohlenz
Esophagectomy for neoplasia includes removal of the cervical part of the esophagus combined with cervical lymphadenectomy and reconstruction by interposition of a free jejunal transplant with microvascular anastomoses.
Resection of a segment of up to 3 cm can be performed with primary anastomosis of the esophagus aer adequate mobilization.
Indications and Contraindications

Indications
Contraindications
Cervical esophageal neoplasia
-
Benign esophageal stricture
-
Local irresectability (inltration of larynx, trachea, or vertebrae)
-
Multifocal lesions
-
Distant metastasis
-
Florid gastroduodenal ulcer
-
Crohn’s disease
-
Procedure
Access
For the cervical part, a unilateral or bilateral (U-) incision at the medial margin of the sterno­cleidomastoid muscle is performed. It extends from the margo inferior of the mandible to the jugulum, where it meets with the contralateral side. For cervical-mediastinal lymph node dissec­tion, the incision is combined with a partial or complete median sternotomy. For harvesting the transplant, a small upper abdominal transverse incision is sucient.
Exposure
Retraction is performed by hand-held retractors of dierent shapes and sizes according to the anatomy. If available, a self-retaining retraction system will help.
P.-A. Clavien, M. G. Sarr, Y. Fong, M. Miyazaki (Eds.), Atlas of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surger y, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46546-2_9, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Step 1
Preparation of the Cervical Region
Aer transection of the platysma, the sternocleidomastoid muscle is retracted and the omohyoid muscle is divided. Along with the internal jugular vein, the common carotid artery and the vagal nerve are identied along the entire length of the incision and a lymphadenectomy around these structures is performed. e superior thyroid artery can be preserved for reconstruction. From the carotid artery, the anterior longitudinal ligament is reached and the posterior dissection of the cervical esophagus is completed under vision.
Aer mobilization of the le (or right) thyroid lobe, the recurrent nerve and the parathyroids are identied and preserved. Injuries to the recurrent nerve should be repaired immediately. Autotransplantation of dissected parathyroids should be performed in the forearm if radiation therapy is an option.
Quite frequently a hemithyroidectomy facilitates the further procedure signicantly. Now the posterior aspect of the trachea is dissected, and aer identication of the contralateral recurrent nerve, the cervical esophagus is completely mobilized from the hypopharynx to the upper thoracic aperture or below.
Occasionally the identication of important blood vessels can only be guaranteed using intra­operative Doppler ultrasound. Especially following extensive tumor resections of the oropharyn­geal region, vast alterations of the typical anatomy must be expected. Injuries of the thoracic duct can lead to the development of persistent stulas associated with signicant uid loss, protracted by a previous radiotherapy.
In cases of extensive tumor growth that warrant resection, more extensive procedures may become necessary (e. g., larynx or trachea).
Before resection, place retaining sutures on the potential proximal and distal stump (. Fig. 9.1).
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
. Fig.9.1
22
23
Chapter  • Cervical Esophagectomy

Step 2
Transection of the Esophagus
e cervical esophagus is transected and the nasogastric tube withdrawn to the level of the neck so that the specimen can be removed. Conrm free margins by frozen section on both sides. In case negative margins cannot be achieved, an esophagectomy should be performed (
. Fig. 9.2).
. Fig.9.2
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Step 3
Preparation of the Jejunal Loop
e jejunal loop is harvested aer exploration of the abdominal cavity with sucient arterial and venous length and lumen. If the mesentery is very thick, a meticulous removal of fatty tissue may enable diaphanoscopy. However, under diaphanoscopy, an artery and a vein of sucient length and lumen are identied. Aer clamping on the mesenteric side and excision of the gra, the artery is ushed with heparinized saline until the venous outow is clear.
If the vascular pedicle or one of the vessels is too short, it becomes necessary to harvest a venous or arterial interponate. e primary source for viable venous interponates is the forearm, whereas for the artery the saphenous vein can be employed. Vessels harvested from the arm or foot region are equally suitable for the arterial interponate whereas the saphenous vein, owing to its dimension and susceptibility to spasm, proves to be hardly suitable for venous interpositioning and should thus be reserved only for arterial lengthening. At times it is very dicult to dieren­tiate between the artery and the vein in the intestinal ap. To avoid confusing the two, prior to harvesting, the artery or vein should be unmistakably marked.
An end-to-end jejunostomy is performed to reconstruct the bowel, and the abdomen is closed without drainage (. Fig. 9.3).
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
. Fig.9.3
22
23