Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_794_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
43 Мб
Скачать
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
(RAMIE): Ivor Lewis
Inderpal S. Sarkaria, Nabil P. Rizk
It has become increasingly recognized that minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) approaches have comparable oncologic and functional outcomes as open approaches. Additionally, a growing body of literature – including one prospective, randomized, controlled study – suggests that MIE provides improvements in pulmonary and wound complications and short-term pain indices, compared with open surgery.
Although the experience with robotic-assisted MIE (RAMIE) is relatively limited compared with standard MIE, experience with RAMIE is increasing. Published studies cite a wide range of surgical approaches featuring robotic assistance, most commonly with robotic assistance used for thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization. A smaller number of studies have described combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic robotic esophagectomy with an anastomosis performed in either the neck or the chest. At our institution, we have developed and standardized one such RAMIE approach that uses a four-arm robotic platform for both the Ivor Lewis and McKeown (three­hole) approaches. e Ivor Lewis approach, which is most commonly performed in our service, is described here.


Indications and Contraindications
Indications
e malignant and benign indications for RAMIE are similar to those for open and standard MIE Ivor Lewis resections. Malignant indications are largely based on tumor location and size and represent the predominant indications for esophageal resection. In the North American popula­tion, these most commonly consist of distal and midesophageal adenocarcinomas. For patients with distal squamous cell carcinomas, Ivor Lewis resection may be considered; however, given the higher incidence of multifocal disease among these patients, we favor McKeown esophagectomy. For patients with midesophageal squamous cell tumors and those with proximal tumors of any histologic type, we perform a McKeown resection. Benign indications are less common and gener­ally represent advanced esophageal disease with signicant organ dysfunction. Patients with the following diagnoses are most suitable for a RAMIE approach:
Distal esophageal adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas
-
Midesophageal adenocarcinomas
-
End-stage achalasia
-
Recalcitrant benign strictures of the middle and distal esophagus
-
Contraindications
e contraindications for RAMIE (versus open surgery) are similar to those for standard MIE. Although these contraindications may be relative across institutions, we have not performed MIE for the following cases:
Patients requiring colon interposition
-
Patients with proximal esophageal tumors possibly requiring laryngectomy
-
Patients with extensive adhesions not amenable to minimally invasive approaches
-
Our relative contraindications for the Ivor Lewis RAMIE approach are identical to those for standard MIE and open resections at our institution:
Proximal and midesophageal squamous cell carcinomas
-
Proximal esophageal adenocarcinomas
-
P.-A. Clavien, M. G. Sarr, Y. Fong, M. Miyazaki (Eds.), Atlas of Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surger y, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46546-2_38, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
Preoperative Workup
Patients with biopsy-conrmed esophageal carcinoma undergo preoperative evaluation to as­sess their tness for surgery. Staging assessment includes computed tomography scanning of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; endoscopic ultrasound; and 18-uorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. In appropriate patients with limited disease, tumors conned to the mucosa (T1a or less) undergo endoscopic mucosal resection and ablation of remaining Bar­rett’s mucosa or dysplasia. Patients not amenable to endoscopic therapy and those with clinically early-stage invasive lesions (T1b or T2, with no evidence of local lymph node metastases) are recommended for surgery. Patients with clinically advanced local-regional disease (T3 and/or N1, N2, or N3) are referred for induction chemotherapy and radiation, followed by surgical resection approximately 4 to 6weeks aer completion of neoadjuvant treatment.
Procedure
Room setup and patient positioning
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
38
16
17
18
For both the abdominal and the thoracic phases, the robotic instrumentation cart is set up on the patient’s right side. We use a four-arm robotic platform with two operating consoles. Two attend­ing surgeons are present for all cases – one at the bedside and one at the robotic console – with an advanced surgical trainee at the second operating console. Single-lung isolation with double­lumen tube intubation is performed during the thoracoscopic phase. To assess the position of the tumor, upper endoscopy is performed before the patient is positioned.
For the abdominal phase, the patient is placed supine on the table, with a footboard in place. e patient’s arms are placed at 45°, and the patient is shied to the right side of the bed to allow appropriate use of the liver retractor. e le arm may be tucked to minimize interaction with the robotic assistant arm. e table is turned 90° to allow placement of the robotic cart and arms (da Vinci Surgical Robot; Intuitive Surgical; Sunnyvale, CA, USA) directly over the midline of the patient (. are docked to the ports. For the thoracic phase, the patient is placed in exion, in the standard le lateral decubitus position, with the right side up and the upper arm in a neutral position. e bed is turned approximately 60°, and the robotic cart is brought in obliquely over the right shoulder (
. Fig. 38.1b).
Fig. 38.1a
). e patient is placed in reverse Trendelenburg position, and the robotic arms
19
20
21
22
23
Chapter  • Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Ivor Lewis


. Fig.38.1
1
ab
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
Port placement
For the abdominal phase, a supraumbilical 12-mm camera port is placed, and pneumoperitoneum is established with CO2 at a pressure of 15 mm Hg. A 12-mm, 30° robotic camera is used. Ad­ditional ports are placed under direct vision, including a le lateral 5-mm subcostal port for use by the 5-mm robotic atraumatic grasper (Schertl Grasper; Intuitive Surgical); a le midclavicular 8-mm port, placed 13 to 15 cm from the xiphoid, for use by the robotic ultrasonic shears (Har­monic Scalpel; Ethicon; Somerville, NJ, USA); a right lateral 5-mm subcostal port for placement of the liver retractor (Diamond Flex; Snowden Pencer; San Diego, CA, USA); an 8-mm right midclavicular, midabdominal port for use by the bipolar atraumatic grasper (Fenestrated Bipolar Grasper; Intuitive Surgical); and a right paraumbilical 10-mm port for suction, retraction, stapling, and passage of sutures by the bedside assistant (. Fig. 38.2a). To minimize robotic arm collisions, a distance of at least 9 to 10 cm is maintained between robotic ports.
For the thoracic phase, right lung isolation is performed, a Veress needle is placed within the chest, and pneumothorax is established with CO2 at a pressure of 8 mm Hg. Establishing a pneumothorax is helpful in attening the diaphragm and exposing the hiatus. A 12-mm camera port is placed in the eighth or ninth interspace, in the posterior axillary line. Additional ports are placed under direct vision, including a 5-mm port in the third intercostal space, in the mid- to posterior axillary line, for use by the 5-mm robotic atraumatic grasper; an 8-mm robotic port in the h intercostal space for use by the robotic ultrasonic shears; an additional 8-mm port laterally in approximately the ninth or tenth interspace (positioned over the hiatus) for use by the robotic bipolar grasper; and a 12-mm assistant port laterally at the diaphragmatic insertion for suction, retraction, stapling, and passage of sutures by the bedside assistant (
. Fig. 38.2b).
11
12
13
14
38
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Step1
5 mm
8 mm port
. Fig.38.2
5 mm
8 mm
8 mm
port
port
12 mm
12 mm
8 mm
port
5 mm
8 mm port
12 mm
12 mm
Abdominal Phase
Hiatal and retrogastric dissection
Initial dissection is begun by opening the lesser sac and dissecting the anterior right and le crura (. Fig. 38.3). For lower esophageal tumors, portions of the right or le crus should be resected en bloc with the esophagus if tumor involvement is identied. To avoid entry into the pleural spaces, which may cause hemodynamic compromise and loss of intraperitoneal CO2 insuation, exces­sive early mediastinal dissection should be minimized at this time. If hemodynamic compromise
Chapter  • Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Ivor Lewis


Step1 (continued)
or loss of intraperitoneal CO2 insuation occurs, the surgeon should consider a low threshold for the initiation of tube thoracostomy.
. Fig.38.3
Exposure to the le gastric vascular pedicle and the lesser sac is achieved through the lesser gastric curve, with anterior retraction using the robotic assistant arm and caudal retraction by the bedside assistant. e celiac axis is skeletonized and the surrounding lymph node–bearing tissues are cleared, with dissection along the superior border of the pancreas and splenic artery, posteriorly to the retroperitoneum, medially along the common hepatic artery, and cranially toward the hiatus. e presence of bulky celiac adenopathy with persistent disease may preclude
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Step1 (continued)
resection if the adenopathy is not surgically removable. e dissected lymph node packet is removed separately or is lied anteriorly toward the specimen, along the le gastric vascular pedicle, which is divided using an endovascular stapler (. stomach using the robotic assistant arm allows for exposure and additional dissection of the le crus from the lesser gastric curve.
Fig. 38.4
). Gentle retraction of the
11
12
13
14
38
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
. Fig.38.4
23
Chapter  • Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Ivor Lewis


Step2
Gastric mobilization
e termination of the gastroepiploic arcade is identied, and the short gastric arteries are divided using the ultrasonic shears. e lesser sac is entered through the greater omentum, and gastric mobilization is completed to the level of the pylorus, with great care to visualize and preserve the right gastroepiploic vascular arcade. e le lateral robotic assistant arm can be used to bluntly re­tract the greater curve of the stomach medially and superiorly, to better visualize the gastroepiploic vasculature (. Fig. 38.5) and to expose and lyse retroperitoneal and gastropancreatic adhesions.
Step3
. Fig.38.5
Pyloroplasty
e robotic assistant arm with the atraumatic grasper is used to gently retract the gastric antrum leward to expose the pylorus. Retraction stitches are placed laterally across the pyloric muscle, pylorotomy is performed using the ultrasonic shears, and the defect is closed transversely with interrupted sutures (
. Fig. 38.6).
. Fig.38.6
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Step4
Gastric conduit formation
e nasogastric tube is withdrawn into the esophagus. e robotic assistant arm is used to gently grasp the tip of the gastric fundus along the line of the divided short gastric arteries and toward the le upper quadrant. e right robotic arm with an additional atraumatic grasper (Cadierre Forceps; Intuitive Surgical) is used to provide gentle inferior traction on the antrum, thus straight­ening the greater gastric curve (. Fig. 38.7). An endovascular stapler is used to divide the lesser curve vasculature at a point approximating the incisura. e gastric tube is constructed and is divided from the specimen by multiple res of the endoGI stapler, with care to maintain proper orientation of the evolving gastric conduit at all times. e proximal gastric tube is reapproximated to the specimen with heavy suture to allow properly oriented entry through the hiatus into the chest during the thoracoscopic phase of the operation.
11
12
13
14
38
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Step5
. Fig.38.7
Thoracic Phase
En bloc esophageal mobilization
Complete en bloc mobilization of the esophagus is performed with clearance of all adjacent lymph node bearing tissue at the hiatus posteriorly along the aorta, anteriorly along the pericardium and airway, and posteriorly along the contralateral pleura.
Aer division of the inferior pulmonary ligament, dissection is initiated along the pericardium, adjacent to the inferior vena cava, and is continued medially to the contralateral pleura, with cra­niolateral lung retraction performed using the robotic assistant arm. e lung is retracted anteriorly using the robotic assistant arm, and dissection is continued cranially along the posterior hilum. e airway is identied, and subcarinal lymph node dissection is completed (. Fig. 38.8). To minimize the risk of thermal injury to the airway from the rigid ultrasonic shears, the robotic bipolar Mary­land dissector (Intuitive Surgical) in the right robotic arm is used during subcarinal dissection. oracoscopic suction by the bedside assistant maintains a clear surgical eld and aids in retraction.
Posterior dissection along the aorta is aided by anterior retraction of the esophagus using the robotic assistant arm. Lymphatic perforators are liberally clipped and aortoesophageal perforating arteries are divided using the ultrasonic shears. e thoracic duct may be ligated near the hiatus.
e distal specimen is brought through the hiatus, with the lesser curve staple line of the at­tached gastric conduit oriented laterally. e specimen and conduit are separated, and the conduit is temporarily secured to the diaphragm, preventing retraction into the abdomen. e specimen is retracted craniolaterally, and medial dissection is completed along the contralateral pleura and le mainstem bronchus.
Chapter  • Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Ivor Lewis


Step5 (continued)
e dissection is continued cranially above the azygous vein, which is divided. e esophagus is divided sharply using the shears in the right robotic arm (Monopolar Scissor; Intuitive Surgical), 2 to 3 cm above the azygous vein, and the nasogastric tube is withdrawn proximally under direct vision into the remaining proximal esophagus. e robotic le-hand 8-mm port is temporarily removed, the incision is extended 3 to 4 cm in length, and a wound protector device is placed. e specimen is removed and evaluated by frozen section to assess proximal and distal margins.
. Fig.38.8
Section II • Esophagus, Stomach, and Duodenum
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Step6
Creation of anastomosis
e 28-mm anvil of the circular anastomotic stapler (DST EEA Stapler; Covidien Surgical; Dublin, Ireland) is placed into the chest through the access incision. In rare cases, a 25-mm anvil may be required if the esophagus cannot accommodate the larger size. e orice of the open esophagus is gently retracted and held open using the right robotic arm and assistant arm graspers, and the anvil is gently inserted using the le robotic arm grasper (Cadierre Forceps; Intuitive Surgical) (. Fig. 38.9a). Needle drivers are situated in the right and le robotic arms, and a “baseball” purse-string stitch, with nonbraided permanent suture (0Prolene SH Needle; Ethicon), is placed to secure the anvil ( anvil. Care is taken to place each suture bite full thickness through esophageal muscle and mucosa. An additional reinforcing purse-string suture is placed aer the anvil is secured (. Fig. 38.9c).
. Fig. 38.9b). Alternatively, the suture may be placed before insertion of the
11
12
13
14
38
16
17
18
19
20
21
. Fig.38.9
e conduit is released from the diaphragm and brought into the chest. A proximal gastrotomy is made and is retracted open at three points using the right robotic arm and the assistant arm graspers, as well as by the bedside assistant. e cartridge of the stapler is introduced through the mini access incision and placed into the proximal conduit, and the spike is brought out through the greater curve, just above the vascular arcade ( the anastomosis is created, and the tissue rings of the esophageal and gastric staplers are inspected for completeness. e nasogastric tube is advanced into the gastric conduit under direct vision, and the redundant conduit and gastrotomy are resected using the endogastrointestinal stapler. e procedure is completed with the placement of an apical-posterior chest tube (10French at Jackson-Pratt drain) adjacent to the anastomosis posteriorly. e nal position of the gastric conduit is shown with a high intrathoracic anastomosis (. Fig. 38.10b).
. Fig. 38.10a). e spike and anvil are joined,
22
23