Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4455_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
47 Мб
Скачать
behavioral test results (A)
https://t.me/medicina_free
and P1, N1, and P2 cortical
auditory evoked potentials
(smoothed and retraced)
(B) for a young adult with
Figure 7–8. Central
temporal lobe epilepsy
7–8). continues
(Case
A
362
7. Disorders of the Central Auditory Nervous System 363
https://t.me/medicina_free
B
Figure 7–8. continued Note: C3 and C4 = electrode
sites.
the C3 electrode site (this electrode site was over the healthy or unaffected hemi­sphere), and the poorest recordings were from the C4 site over the involved hemi­sphere (see Figure 7–8B). As can be seen, all of these recordings are noisy with poor replicability.
Medical Management
At last contact with the patient, he had not undergone surgery as he and his parents were still considering various options for the control of the seizure disorder.
Case 7–9: Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
History
This 40-year-old female presented with increased difficulty understanding speech in background noise for several years prior to her evaluation. She admitted to difficulty understanding speech even in one-on-one conversations, following mul­tistep directions, and needing extra time to process conversations. She worked as a medical technician and expressed
364 Disorders of the Auditory System
https://t.me/medicina_free
increased difficulty at work. She was diag­nosed with epilepsy at the age of 13.
Audiology
The patient underwent an audiologic eval­uation. Pure-tone air- and bone-conduction audiometry revealed normal peripheral hearing sensitivity through 4000 Hz in the left ear sloping to a mild to moderate sen­sorineural hearing loss from 6000 to 8000 Hz. Test results for the right ear indicated essentially normal peripheral hearing sen­sitivity through 6000 Hz sloping to a very mild sensorineural hearing loss at 8000 Hz. Word recognition scores were 100% in the right ear and 84% in the left ear at 40 dB SL re: SRT. Due to the asymmetry noted in the pure-tone thresholds and the speech recognition scores, the patient was referred to neurotology for evaluation to rule out retrocochlear involvement.
Medical Evaluation
The patient was evaluated by neurotol­ogy due to the asymmetric hearing loss noted during her audiologic evaluation. Imaging was negative for retrocochlear involvement.
Impression
Auditory processing deficit secondary to temporal lobe epilepsy.
Audiologic Recommendations and Management
Due to the auditory complaints, an audi­tory processing evaluation was recom­mended. Results from the auditory pro­cessing evaluation are seen in Figure 7–9. Abnormal performance was noted on all tests administered including the follow­ing tests: dichotic digits (moderate left
ear deficit and a very mild right ear defi­cit), filtered words (bilateral deficits), and duration patterns assessed in the sound field (severe deficit). Results of the Speech in Noise–Revised (SPIN-R) Test (admin­istered in the sound field) demonstrated a large discrepancy between high- versus low-probability sentences.
As a result of the deficits on the audi­tory processing battery, the patient under­went DIID training, which included 12 sessions during a 6-week period. Results demonstrated a significant improvement in binaural integration (see dichotic dig­its retest scores) as well as speech-in­noise (SPIN-R scores) test performance (see Figure 7–9). The patient noted over­all improvement in her ability to hear, particularly in challenging listening environments.
Medical Recommendations and Management
Continued monitoring and management by audiology.
suRgical
inteRventions that
alteR centRal
auditoRy function
Temporal lobe epilepsy leads into another topic of interest. As mentioned earlier, epilepsy sometimes is treated by tempo­ral lobectomy (removal of the anterior portion of the temporal lobe) or commis­surotomy (sectioning the corpus callo­sum). These procedures can have rather marked consequences for central auditory function. Considerable data have been generated on central auditory deficits associated with temporal lobectomy and
posttherapy (retest) central
https://t.me/medicina_free
behavioral test results for
Figure 7–9. Pre- and
an adult with temporal lobe
epilepsy (Case 7–9).
365
366 Disorders of the Auditory System
https://t.me/medicina_free
split-brain surgery. The closer the surgical sectioning to the primary auditory areas, the greater the deficit(s) and vice versa, and this needs to be kept in mind when reviewing these types of studies (see Oxbury & Oxbury, 1969).
Temporal Lobectomy
Behavioral Tests
Dichotic Listening Tests. In an inves-
tigation of central auditory function in individuals with temporal lobectomy, dichotic listening results showed defi­cits (often severe) in the ear opposite the side of the lobectomy (Oxbury & Oxbury,
1969). In some situations, excision of part of the temporal lobe does not create large deficits. In one study utilizing the SSW and dichotic CVs, there were no signifi­cant differences between pre- and postop­erative results for the ipsilateral ear, but there were for the contralateral ear and for the difference between ears (Collard et al., 1986). There is some evidence that left temporal lobe excisions result in greater deficits than those in the right hemisphere (Bougeard & Fischer, 2002). These types of comparisons, however, suffer from the high probability that the lesions studied were not equivalent and, therefore, the results must be interpreted with caution.
Temporal Processing Tests. There is
a paucity of information on temporal processing functions and temporal lobec­tomy. There was, however, a key study reported on anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) and gap detection. In this study, gap intervals in noise were significantly longer for individuals with ATL than for the control group. In addition, it appeared that the greater deficit was contralateral
to the lesioned hemisphere (Efron et al.,
1985). This study raises the issue that these patients may have temporal resolution problems and that the anterior temporal lobe possibly may play a role in auditory processing. Another study revealed prob­lems in musical timbre perception in gen­eral, and more specifically, on a subtest of multidimensional scaling among patients with temporal lobectomies compared to controls. This procedure is complex and a full description of the procedure is beyond the scope of what can be reported here. However, it is interesting to note that depending on which particular subtest was given, the right hemisphere (when compromised) seemed to have consider­able influence on test performance (Sam­son, Zatorre, & Ramsey, 2002).
Electrophysiologic Tests
Like temporal processing, there is lim­ited information on the results of evoked potential testing in individuals who have undergone temporal lobectomies. The MLR Na wave has been shown to be delayed across Cz, C5, and C6 electrode sites in patients with ATL compared to controls. Also, interestingly, the NaPa amplitude was found to be greater after surgery (at the same electrode positions) than it was prior to surgery (Jacobson, Privitera, Neils, Grayson, & Yeh, 1990). In a case study, P300 amplitude was found to be decreased after temporal lobectomy but returned to near preoperative values 2 weeks after surgery (Hirayasu, Ohta, Fukao, Ogura, & Mukawa, 1995). In another case study, N1, P2, and P3 (P300) evoked potentials actually increased in amplitude and decreased in latency after surgery (Musiek et al., 1990). In this case, it was hypothesized that reducing the seizure disturbance allowed the evoked
7. Disorders of the Central Auditory Nervous System 367
https://t.me/medicina_free
potential responses to become more syn­chronous, allowing more of the genera­tors to respond appropriately.
Commissurotomy
The next major surgical intervention, also for intractable seizures, is commissur­otomy or split-brain surgery. This surgi­cal procedure is done to prevent epilepsy from spreading from one hemisphere to the other. Much has been written about these cases and their deficits, but only a thumbnail sketch is offered here. Of note is that only certain audiologic tests will show deficits in these kinds of patients. The most heralded is dichotic listening. The other, although not as profound, is certain types of pattern perception. As one would expect, other diagnostic tests, which do not engage (at least to a high degree) the corpus callosum do not show deficits and can be utilized to rule in or out hemispheric or subcortical involve­ment (see Baran & Musiek, 1999).
Behavioral Tests
Dichotic Listening Tests. As is now
well known, commissurotomy results in severe left ear deficits on dichotic listen­ing tests in these patients. Although not a consistent finding, in some patients, the right ear performance actually improves after surgery (Musiek et al., 1984). Audi­tory deficits can be demonstrated only if the posterior half of the corpus callosum is sectioned as that is where the auditory fibers cross from one hemisphere to the other (Baran, Musiek, & Reeves, 1986). Severe dichotic left ear deficits and normal performance on other central tests, such as filtered speech and speech in noise, help make the diagnosis of callosal involvement.
Temporal Processing Tests. The fre-
quency pattern perception test yields a bilateral deficit (for verbal report) in split­brain patients (Musiek et al., 1980). This is because both hemispheres are needed to decode and verbally report the pat­terns. Often, there can be asymmetry, but both ears will yield performance below the normal range. Although data for the duration pattern test are not available, it is likely that similar results would also be noted for this temporal patterning test.
Monaural Low Redundancy Speech Tests. Tests such as filtered speech, com-
pressed speech, and speech-in-noise are typically not affected by sectioning of the corpus callosum. These tests usually yield normal or near-normal performance bilat­erally. This is important to know because these kinds of tests help in determin­ing if left ear deficits are related to right hemisphere involvement or corpus callo­sum compromise. That is, if the monau­ral speech test (as well as dichotic tests) shows a left ear deficit, then it is likely that the right hemisphere is involved. However, if the monaural speech test is normal and the dichotic test shows a left ear deficit, then it is likely that the corpus callosum is not transferring information appropriately.
Electrophysiologic Tests
Few studies have been conducted in patients with commissurotomy. Probably the most cited is a study by Kutas, Hill­yard, Volpe, and Gazzaniga (1990). This study showed that for N2 and P3 (P300) evoked potentials, split-brain patients showed smaller potentials over the left hemisphere compared to the right for the P3 (P300). Also, when compared to the control subjects, the evoked potentials
368 Disorders of the Auditory System
https://t.me/medicina_free
were smaller for the patients who had undergone commissurotomy. However, as mentioned previously, these smaller responses also could be related to dam­age to other auditory areas of the brain in these subjects. In our own experience using tonal stimuli, there has been essen­tially little or no change in N1, P2, or P3 (P300) potentials before compared to after commissurotomy. Of course, the utiliza­tion of speech stimuli, especially in some type of dichotic paradigm, may result in much different results.
Case 7–10: Commissurotomy
History
This young adult underwent surgical commissurotomy for intractable grand mal seizures. This patient had previously been under a neurologic protocol for sei­zure management as daily activities were becoming difficult to carry out.
Audiology
Pure-tone thresholds were normal with excellent speech recognition bilaterally before and after surgery. Central audi­tory test results obtained prior to surgery were within the normal range bilater­ally. However, following surgery, there was a marked left ear deficit for the dichotic digits and the staggered spon­daic word (SSW) tests with only mildly depressed scores noted for the right ear on both of these tests. In addition, the patient’s scores for the frequency patterns test were severely depressed bilaterally (Figure 7–10). Speech-in-babble scores remained normal bilaterally. These results were consistent with expected postcom­missurotomy audiologic results.
Medical Examination and Management
The focus of the seizure activity was local­ized by EEG in both hemispheres. Com­puterized tomography scans were normal except for slightly enlarged lateral ventri­cles. There was no history of any auditory problems. The surgery went well, and the patient was able to resume many nor­mal everyday activities due to a marked decrease in the number of seizures. Tasks requiring interhemispheric interaction, of course, were difficult for the patient.
centRal auditoRy
disoRdeR associated
with leaRning
difficulties
Introduction
One of the most popular uses of central auditory tests is to identify individuals (mostly children) with auditory process­ing disorder that may either precipi­tate or coexist with learning difficulties. Although the basis for this kind of prob­lem is not known, there are several good theories as to what may cause these prob­lems. Children with normal hearing and intelligence but who complain of hear­ing difficulties (or whose family and/or teachers raise concerns regarding poten­tial hearing difficulties in their child or student) and who also have difficulty with learning (especially in the verbally related subjects such as reading and spelling) are candidates for a central auditory process­ing evaluation and a diagnosis of CAPD if supported by test results. Other factors, such as language proficiency and atten­tion deficits, may be comorbid conditions
Figure 7–10. Central
https://t.me/medicina_free
behavioral test results for a
young adult who underwent
a commissurotomy to control
intractable grand mal sei-
zures (Case 7–10).
369
370 Disorders of the Auditory System
https://t.me/medicina_free
that often enter into this complex picture. However, many cases of central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) do not have either language or attention issues. The combining of behavioral and electrophys­iologic tests of central auditory function is a prudent approach to defining this prob­lem. Evaluation of speech-language and attention also is key in making an accurate diagnosis.
Symptoms
As with other disorders of the CANS, children with learning-related central auditory disorder complain of difficulty hearing in background noise, trouble understanding people who talk fast, prob­lems hearing in highly reverberant rooms, problems following multistep directions, difficulty in interpreting verbal messages, and sometimes even having trouble local­izing sound sources. Academically, these individuals often have trouble reading and spelling, but do fine in math and sci­ence. At times, some students appear to be inattentive, whereas others seem to attend closely in watching people speak (see Chermak & Musiek, 1997).
Incidence and Prevalence
The incidence or prevalence of CAPD associated with learning disability is un­known. There are some “educated guesses” that place the prevalence around 2% to 3% of the school-age population (Chermak & Musiek, 1997). Of course, this is not based on any prevalence study but does seem to be a reasonable estimate based on our experience in seeing large num­bers of school-age children with this type
of problem and reviewing the prevalence of related problems such as learning dis­abilities, attention deficits, and so on.
Etiology and Pathology
The etiology of CAPD related to learn­ing difficulties is not known, but more information is emerging that supports our early theoretical categories of what may cause or play a role in this type of CAPD (Chermak & Musiek, 2011; Mus­iek, Gollegly, & Ross, 1985). One category is neurologic. That is, a small percentage have CAPD (and possibly learning diffi­culties) secondary to a frank neurologic problem (see Chermak & Musiek, 2011). Although any of a wide range of neuro­logic disorders, such as those discussed earlier in this chapter, can play a role in this kind of CAPD, absence seizure dis­order may be the most common. Another category is delayed maturation of myelin within the auditory system. Myelination of the higher auditory regions does not mature until the teenage years (Yakovlev & LeCours, 1967). This long maturational course lends itself to great variability over the years of growth and some chil­dren may “lag” behind in the maturation of their CANS. This neuromaturational lag means less myelin and slower trans­fer velocities and potential central deficits that may manifest as CAPD. The third category is that of neuromorphologi­cal abnormalities (see Galaburda, Sher­man, Rosen, Aboitz, & Geschwind, 1985). Polymicrogyria, heterotopias, and ecto­pic areas of the brain have been shown to exist primarily in the left hemisphere and in the auditory regions in individu­als with dyslexia. In addition, the planum temporale, which is usually larger on the
7. Disorders of the Central Auditory Nervous System 371
https://t.me/medicina_free
left than right side, often is symmetrical in children with dyslexia/learning disabili­ties. These abnormalities are anatomic abnormalities that could easily disrupt appropriate functions, especially audi­tory functions. In fact, a recent report has shown this to be the case in children with polymicrogyria who do poorly on central auditory tests (Boscariol et al., 2009).
Site of Lesion
Depending on what may be the under­lying condition that results in the CAPD related to learning disability, the site of lesion will vary. However, it seems that most individuals with this problem have auditory cortex or corpus callosum dys­function (normal ABRs are common in this particular population). If hetero­topias and polymicrogyria are players, then obviously the auditory cortex will be involved. Myelination of the corpus callosum is the last to mature within the auditory system; hence, this could be a site for “delayed” maturation. A study by Skoe and Kraus (2010) indicates that abnormalities on speech ABRs possibly could implicate the brainstem as a site for dysfunction in these kinds of cases, but further work must be done to solidify this possibility. Another point of consid­eration in this population as well as other populations discussed in this chapter is that of neural connectivity. Heterotopias, polymicrogyria, and myelin maturational delay could all contribute to poor neural connectivity within the CANS. This could decrease function of the neural substrate as neurons and pathways cannot com­municate optimally, which is critical for both high-level learning and auditory processing.
Medical Diagnosis
Central auditory processing disorder related to learning disability is primarily an audiologic diagnosis. Only when there is an underlying medical condition is there medical input to the diagnosis. The same can be said for treatment.
Audiology
In the assessment of learning difficulties linked with CAPD, tests with reasonable sensitivity and specificity (based on cases of confirmed lesions of the central audi­tory system) should be considered first. Consistent with this thinking, behavioral tests of dichotic listening, temporal pro­cessing, and degraded monaural speech tests are useful. Also, binaural interaction procedures such as masking level differ­ences can be of value. In addition, auditory evoked potentials like the combination of ABR-MLR (or others) are suggested. It is important to attempt to evaluate as many processes as possible without making the test battery too long and tiring.
Audiologic Management
Treatment can include several approaches. One is auditory training (AT), which capi­talizes on auditory plasticity. By training on tasks that are related to the deficit(s), the deficit(s) can be ameliorated in many cases (see Chermak & Musiek, 2014). Assistive listening devices, which provide improved signal-to-noise ratios in set­tings such as the classroom, can also help with the problems. These approaches, as well as metacognitive strategies, can well serve those with learning disabilities and