Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_747_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
404 Transhiatal esophagectomy
https://t.me/med1917
Traction is then applied on the rubber drain encircling
6
the gastroesophageal junction, and the opposite hand is inserted palm downward through the diaphragmatic hiatus along the anterior surface of the esophagus and is advanced upward into the superior mediastinum behind the trachea. The portion of upper esophagus that was circumferentially mobilized can be identified with the fingertips. Once the intact lateral attachments are palpated, the esophagus is trapped against the prevertebral fascia by the index and mid­dle fingers, and a gentle downward raking motion of the hand avulses the remainder of the filmy periesophageal attach­ments.
6
Sizable vagal branches may be palpated along the middle
7
and distal esophagus at this point, and by placement of narrow deep retractors into the diaphragmatic hiatus, they can be identified, divided, and ligated using long right-angled clamps. At times, finger fracture between the index finger and thumb of subcarinal or subaortic periesophageal adhesions may be required.
7
In elderly patients with cervical arthritis which
https://t.me/med1917
8a–c
patients with a “bullneck” habitus, access to the cervical and upper thoracic esophagus may be facilitated by a partial upper sternal split, which provides exposure almost to the level of the carina.
Once the entire intrathoracic esophagus is mobile, an 8- to 10-cm length is delivered into the cervical wound, where an Endo GIA surgical stapler is applied and fired obliquely in an anterior to posterior direction, leaving the anterior tip of the divided esophagus slightly longer than the posterior corner. The stomach is then drawn out of the abdominal wound with the attached esophagus.
Once the esophagus has been delivered from the posterior mediastinum, narrow deep retractors are inserted into the diaphragmatic hiatus so that the posterior mediastinum can be inspected for bleeding and the mediastinal pleura for lat­eral rents that indicate the need for a chest tube. Blood is again evacuated from the posterior mediastinum using the Argyle Saratoga sump catheter inserted through the cervical wound. A 28-Fr. chest tube is inserted into the appropriate pleural cavity if entry has occurred during the esophagec­tomy. A large abdominal pack is then placed in the low poste­rior mediastinum through the diaphragmatic hiatus and a narrow “thoracic” pack in the superior mediastinum through the cervical incision to tamponade any vascular oozing. Attention is then turned toward preparing the stomach for its transposition into the chest. The stomach and attached esophagus are placed on the anterior abdominal wall, and the point along the high greater curvature that will reach most cephalad to the neck is identified and held by the assistant with a moist pack. The lesser curvature of the stomach is then cleared of fat by dividing the vessels and fat between clamps at the level of the second vascular arcade from the cardia.
prevents extension of the neck, or obese
Operation 405
8b
8a
8c
9
A GIA stapler with a 6-cm cartridge is then applied
9
beginning at this point on the lesser curvature and pro­ceeding toward the gastric tip. Each time the stapler is removed, traction is applied to the gastric fundus to allow the stomach to be straightened progressively so that its cephalad reach is maximized. The GIA stapler is applied on average three times. As wide as possible a gastric tube is created to maximize submucosal collateral circulation and vascularity of the conduit; a narrow gastric tube is avoided.
406 Transhiatal esophagectomy
https://t.me/med1917
Once the partial proximal gastrectomy has been
10
stomach are removed from the field, and the gastric staple suture line is oversewn with two running 4/0 polypropylene Lembert stitches. This same technique is used when resecting carcinomas localized to the cardia and proximal stomach. Rather than carry out a traditional proximal hemigastrec­tomy, which wastes valuable stomach (stippled area of Figure
10) that can be used for esophageal replacement and commits the surgeon to an intrathoracic esophageal anastomosis, the surgeon divides the stomach as described earlier 4–6 cm dis­tal to the palpable tumor, thereby preserving the greater cur­vature and the point along the gastric fundus that reaches to the neck (asterisk in Figure 10).
The previously placed mediastinal packs are removed, and with the narrow deep retractors placed into the hiatus, a last inspection is made for any bleeding, which can be controlled under direct vision through the diaphragmatic hiatus. Again, the 28-Fr. Argyle Saratoga sump inserted through the neck wound provides a dry field as the posterior mediastinum is inspected through the hiatus. To ensure an adequate poste­rior mediastinal tunnel for the stomach, the surgeon inserts the entire hand and forearm through the diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus and advances them through the posterior mediastinum until three or four fingers are visible in the cer­vical incision. During this procedure, the blood pressure must be watched carefully.
completed, the esophagus and attached proximal
Attention is now redirected to the diaphragmatic hiatus.
10
11
The stomach is then again delivered onto the anterior
11
will extend most cephalad is identified.
chest wall, and the point along the gastric fundus that
The diaphragmatic hiatus is elevated with a narrow
https://t.me/med1917
12
and manipulated progressively upward through the diaphragmatic hiatus into the posterior mediastinum. No drain is sutured to the stomach, and no suction device to pull the stomach through the mediastinum is used to minimize trauma to the stomach. Once the gastric fundus can be pul­pated with the index finger inserted through the cervical inci­sion, a Babcock clamp is inserted downward into the superior mediastinum through the cervical incision, and the tip of the gastric fundus is manipulated into the clamp by the hand within the posterior mediastinum. The gastric tip is grasped with clamp, which is not ratcheted closed, and is drawn into the cervical wound more by pushing the stomach upward beneath the aortic arch by the hand in the posterior medi­astinum than by pulling the Babcock clamp. As soon as there is sufficient stomach visible within the cervical incision, the clamp is removed from the field in order to minimize gastric trauma, and the tip of the stomach is grasped with the finger­tips and guided into the neck wound. (inset) The hand in the posterior mediastinum is withdrawn.
palpated through the diaphragmatic hiatus and the cervical incision to insure that the stomach has not been twisted dur­ing its positioning in the chest. When the stomach has been brought through the posterior mediastinum without torsion, the oversewn staple suture line should be oriented toward the patient’s right side. The stomach is not sutured to the prever­tebral fascia in order to avoid traumatizing an already rela­tively ischemic gastric tip. The position of the stomach in the cervical wound is maintained by inserting a small moistened thoracic gauze pack alongside the stomach in the thoracic inlet to prevent it from slipping back downward into the mediastinum.
tents, the cervical gastroesophageal anastomosis is not begun until the abdominal incision is closed completely and excluded from the field. Before the abdomen is closed, how­ever, a final inspection for bleeding, particularly in the area of the spleen, is made. The diaphragmatic hiatus is narrowed with one to three #1 silk sutures so as to admit three fingers along the side of the stomach easily. The edge of the diaphrag­matic hiatus is tacked to the adjacent anterior gastric wall with one or two 3/0 silk sutures to prevent intrathoracic her­niation of bowel. The pyloromyotomy is covered by adjacent omentum, and the previously retracted left hepatic lobe is returned to its normal position. The feeding jejunostomy tube is then brought out through a left upper quadrant stab wound, and the jejunum is fixed to the anterior abdominal wall with several interrupted sutures. The abdominal incision is then closed and isolated from the field by covering it with a sterile towel and sheet. Attention is now redirected to the neck, where the cervical gastroesophageal anastomosis is per­formed.
Deaver retractor, and the stomach is gently grasped
The anterior surface of the intrathoracic stomach is greatly
To avoid contamination of the abdomen by intraoral con-
Operation 407
12
408 Transhiatal esophagectomy
https://t.me/med1917
Cervical gastroesophageal anastomosis
When the stomach has been properly mobilized,
13a
level of the clavicles against the prevertebral fascia and well behind the divided cervical esophagus.
4–5 cm of the gastric tip rest in the neck above the
13a
13b
The traction suture is used to elevate the anterior
14
secured to the drapes with a hemostat. The site of the anasto­mosis (dotted line) is determined by lowering the divided end of the esophagus against the gastric wall, and a 1.5- to 2-cm vertical gastrotomy is made with the cutting electrocautery current. This gastrotomy must be placed low enough on the stomach so that a 3-cm staple cartridge can be accommo­dated in the tip of the stomach superior to this point.
surface of the stomach to the level of the skin and is
The end of the divided esophagus is grasped and
13b
rior surface of the stomach as near to the sternum as possible is grasped with a Babcock clamp, elevated further into the cervical wound, and rotated medially in order to displace the gastric staple suture line away from the site of the subsequent anastomosis. A 3-0 silk seromuscular gastric traction suture is placed as far inferiorly near the sternum as possible.
elevated to the right with an Allis clamp. The ante-
14
The esophageal staple suture line is retracted inferi-
https://t.me/med1917
15
obliquely with a DeBakey forceps, and the staple line ampu­tated sharply using the forceps as a guide against the knife. This end is submitted to pathology as the “proximal esophageal margin.” It is important to remember that once the anastomosis is completed and the gastric traction suture cut, the stomach will partially retract downward toward the mediastinum. Therefore overaggressive shortening of the remaining esophagus should be avoided in order to minimize tension on the anastomosis. Alternatively, if the residual esophagus proximal to the anastomosis is too redundant, the ultimate functional outcome may not be good.
orly with two Allis clamps, the esophagus grasped
Operation 409
15
Placement of two stay sutures is extremely important
16
wall and the anterior wall of the stomach. One suture passes through the anterior tip of the divided esophagus. The other suture passes in and out of the upper corner of the gastro­tomy and then from outside in on the posterior end of the esophagus.
in insuring alignment of the posterior esophageal
16
While applying continual downward trac-
17a,b
blade (anvil) of an Endo GIA 30-3.5 staple cartridge (United States Surgical Corp, Norwalk, CT, USA) is inserted into the stomach, and the thicker staple-bearing portion into the esophagus. The jaws of the stapler are partially approximated as the stapler is gradually rotated so that the cartridge points toward the patient’s right ear, carefully aligning the posterior esophageal and anterior gastric walls.
tion on the above two sutures, the thinner
3 cm
17
After closing the stapler, but before firing it, two
18
either side between the gastric wall and adjacent esophagus.
“suspension” absorbable 4-0 sutures are placed on
18
410 Transhiatal esophagectomy
https://t.me/med1917
The knife assembly of the stapler is advanced, thereby
19
terior wall of the esophagus and creating a 3 cm long side-to­side anastomosis. The stapler is removed from the field, and a nasogastric tube is inserted by the anesthesiologist and guided into the intrathoracic stomach by the surgeon.
joining the anterior wall of the stomach and the pos-
19
An absorbable 4-0 “corner stitch” is placed on either
20
opened esophagus and stomach are approximated in two lay­ers of 4-0 monofilament absorbable suture, the first, a run­ning full-thickness inverting suture.
side of the opened stomach and esophagus. The
20
The second layer consists of interrupted full thick-
21
this closure will not compromise the anastomosis, which is more posterior under the “hood” of the esophagus. A silver metallic hemostatic clip is placed on both of the corner sutures, which are then cut. The clips serve as markers of the anastomosis for future radiographic studies. The cervical wound is then irrigated, and a 1⁄4-inch rubber drain placed to its depth. Muscle fascia is approximated loosely with three to five absorbable 3-0 interrupted sutures, and the skin with a running 4-0 nylon suture. After placement of dressings on the abdominal and cervical incisions and the chest tube(s) and jejunostomy tube sites, a portable chest radiograph is obtained in the operating room to document full expansion of the lungs and exclude an unrecognized hemo- or pneu­mothorax.
COMPLICATIONS
Intraoperative complications associated with transhiatal esophagectomy include entry into one or both pleural cavities during the transhiatal dissection, disruption of the tracheo­bronchial tree, and hemorrhage. As indicated earlier, the mediastinal pleurae are inspected after removal of the esoph­agus from the posterior mediastinum, and if pleural entry has
ness inverting sutures. Overaggressive inversion of
21
occurred, a chest tube is inserted and connected to suction before the stomach is positioned in the posterior medi­astinum. Tracheal tears during transhiatal esophagectomy are rare, generally small and linear, and involve the posterior membranous trachea. They are heralded by a rush of air from the ventilator felt either through the diaphragmatic hiatus or the neck wound during the transhiatal dissection. If the air leak is sizable, the endotracheal tube balloon should be
Postoperative care 411
https://t.me/med1917
deflated and the tip of the endotracheal tube guided into the left mainstem bronchus by the hand inserted through the diaphragmatic hiatus. One-lung ventilation may then be achieved in a more controlled fashion. Addition of a partial upper sternal split may provide sufficient exposure of the membranous trachea for direct repair. Before tracheal repair is begun, however, the transhiatal esophagectomy should be completed, if possible, to improve exposure of the posterior membranous trachea. Larger tears may necessitate a right thoracotomy and direct suture closure. Major intraoperative hemorrhage should not occur during transhiatal esophagec­tomy if proper patient selection is used, and attempts to resect an esophagus that is fixed to adjacent structures by tumor or fibrosis are abandoned. Should untoward bleeding occur during the transhiatal dissection, the 28-Fr. Argyle Saratoga sump catheter inserted through the neck incision is used to evacuate the posterior mediastinum as the anterior surface of the aorta is inspected and direct control of the bleeding is obtained. If hemostasis is not possible using this technique, the posterior mediastinum should be packed with large laparotomy pads, and several minutes should be allowed to elapse and intravascular volume replaced before the medi­astinum is again inspected. If bleeding resumes, the pack should be reinserted, the abdomen quickly closed, and the patient repositioned and turned to the appropriate side for a thoracotomy – left if the intraoperative bleeding occurred during dissection of the lower third of the esophagus – and right if the bleeding occurred during dissection of the middle or upper thoracic esophagus.
Intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve injury should not occur if care is taken to avoid direct injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the tracheoesophageal groove. No metal retractors should be placed against the trachea during the cer­vical portions of the operation to prevent this complication.
If the patient develops fever of 101F or more 48 hours after transhiatal esophagectomy, this is presumptive evidence of an anastomotic leak until proven otherwise and is an indi­cation for a contrast study of the esophagus regardless of how uninflamed the cervical wound may be. A water-soluble con­trast material such as Gastrografin may result in severe chem­ical pneumonitis if aspirated and should be avoided. It is best to use dilute barium for this study, as this better defines the mucosal detail. If, on the other hand, the patient begins to drain swallowed liquids from the cervical wound drain site, obviously a leak has occurred, and the neck wound should be opened at the bedside in its entirety by removing the five or six sutures used to close it. Good mechanical cleansing of the open neck wound can be obtained by having the patient swal­low water while at the same time aspirating with a suction catheter any liquid that issues from the cervical wound. The neck wound is packed loosely with saline-moistened sponges several times a day. Most cervical esophagogastric anasto­motic leaks will close within 1 week. Closure is often facili­tated by passage of 36-, 40-, and 46-Fr. tapered Maloney dilators at the bedside. This dilation ensures that no associ­ated distal obstruction (edema or spasm) is present.
Postoperative chylothorax may occur after transhiatal esophagectomy and manifests as prolonged and excessive chest tube drainage (typically greater than 200–400 ml per 8­hour shift). If chylothorax is suspected, cream can be admin­istered through the feeding jejunostomy tube, which will result in a change of the character of the chest tube drainage from serosanguineous to milky white fluid. An aggressive approach is adopted toward treatment of postoperative chy­lothorax in the patient who has undergone transhiatal esophagectomy. A transthoracic approach to the thoracic duct with direct identification and suturing of the leak facili­tated by administration of cream through the jejunostomy tube is preferred to prolonged chest tube drainage and intra­venous hyperalimentation.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
Patient’s are typically extubated in the operating room, as epidural anesthesia provides sufficient pain management so that postoperative mechanical ventilation is unnecessary. After several hours in the recovery room, patients are trans­ferred to a monitored hospital bed, but admission to an intensive care unit is seldom indicated. Because of the routine preoperative emphasis on use of an incentive inspirometer to facilitate postoperative pulmonary hygiene, resumption of use of the inspirometer is begun the afternoon of the opera­tion. Ambulation is begun on the first postoperative day. Because transhiatal esophagectomy is basically an upper abdominal procedure requiring little manipulation of the intestines or the root of the mesentery, postoperative ileus beyond 48–72 hours is unusual, and administration of 5% dextrose and water through the jejunostomy feeding tube may begin at a rate of 30 ml/hour on the second or third postoperative day. If this rate is tolerated for 12 hours, the volume is increased to 60 mL/hour, jejunostomy tube feed­ings are begun the next day and advanced as tolerated. The arterial catheter is removed in the recovery room the day of operation once the endotracheal tube has been removed. The intravenous catheters are removed once jejunostomy feed­ings are tolerated, the cervical wound drain on the third post­operative day, and the nasogastric tube on the third postoperative day when jejunostomy feedings are started. Once the patient has tolerated having no nasogastric tube for 24 hours, oral intake is progressively advanced from a liquid to a soft diet during the first postoperative week. A barium swallow examination is obtained on the seventh postopera­tive day. The barium swallow assesses: (1) anastomotic integrity; (2) emptying of the intrathoracic stomach; and (3) passage of contrast past the jejunostomy tube site. Oral intake should not be withheld until the barium swallow study is obtained, because the patient is swallowing saliva from the moment he or she emerges from general anesthesia, and it is unrealistic to think that nothing is going across the anasto­mosis because of the presence of a nasogastric tube. As oral intake is advanced, the rate of jejunostomy tube feedings may
412 Transhiatal esophagectomy
https://t.me/med1917
be progressively decreased, and eventually tube feedings delivered only at night so as to not interfere with the patient’s appetite during the day. Complaints of postvagotomy dump­ing (varying degrees of cramping and diarrhea) typically respond to an appropriate antidumping diet, avoiding overdistension of the intrathoracic stomach by minimizing the amount of liquid consumed with meals, and antispas­modics such as tincture of opium or diphenoxylate hydrochloride (Lomotil).
The patient is commonly discharged from the hospital after a satisfactory postoperative barium swallow examina­tion on the seventh postoperative day. Supplementation of oral caloric intake at night with two or three cans of tube feedings through the jejunostomy tube may be helpful early after discharge from the hospital, but this is not mandatory if the patient is eating relatively well in the hospital. When the patient returns for the initial postoperative assessment 2–4 weeks after discharge, if the feeding jejunostomy tube is not being used, it is removed.
Early mild postoperative cervical dysphagia may result from anastomotic edema, but this is far less common with the 3-cm stapled side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis. This complaint generally requires no specific therapy and gradu­ally subsides with time. However, any complaint of cervical dysphagia occurring 2–4 weeks after discharge is managed by passage of 36-, 40-, and 46-Fr. Maloney dilators through the anastomosis on an outpatient basis.
OUTCOME
In the past two and a half decades, Orringer and associates have performed transhiatal esophagectomy without thoraco­tomy in more than 2000 patients. In their 1999 report of their initial 1085 transhiatal esophagectomies, 285 (26%) had benign disease and 800 (74%) carcinoma (4.5% upper, 28% middle, and 73.5% lower third and/or cardia). Benign esophageal disease included neuromotor dysfunction (33%); strictures (26%); Barrett’s mucosa with high grade dysplasia (19%); recurrent gastroesophageal reflux (7%); acute perfo­ration (5%); acute caustic injury (5%); and others (5%). Of the patients with benign disease, 52% had undergone at least one previous esophageal operation. Transhiatal esophagec­tomy was possible in 98.6% of the patients in whom it was attempted, the remainder requiring conversion to a transtho­racic approach. The stomach was used as the esophageal sub­stitute in 96% of these patients, firmly establishing the principle that the properly mobilized stomach will virtually always reach to the neck for construction of a cervical esoph­agogastric anastomosis. In 98% of these patients, the esophageal substitute was positioned in the posterior medi­astinum.
The hospital mortality rate for these 1085 patients was 4% (44 deaths), and in most cases death was unrelated to the technique of operation. There were three intraoperative
deaths due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Complications included intraoperative entry into one or both pleural cavities requiring placement of one or more chest tubes (77%), anas­tomotic leak (13%), clinically significant pneumonia or atelectasis (<2%), recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (<1%), and chylothorax and tracheal laceration (less than 1% each). Reoperation for mediastinal bleeding was required within 24 hours of operation in five patients (<1%). The average intra­operative blood loss was 689 ml (795 ml for benign disease and 652 ml for carcinoma). The Kaplan–Meier actuarial sur­vival of our patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma was similar to that reported after more tradi­tional transthoracic esophagectomy; the overall 2-year sur­vival was 47% and the 5-year survival, 23%. Among the patients with benign disease, long-term follow-up has indi­cated good or excellent functional results after a cervical gas­troesophageal anastomosis in nearly 80%. It is the author’s practice to pass a Maloney esophageal dilator on an outpa­tient basis for any complaint of cervical dysphagia after tran­shiatal esophagectomy, no matter how mild. With this liberal use of dilatation, nearly 75% require an esophageal dilatation at some time, but at last follow-up 81% were swallowing well without the need for dilatations. With the side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis we have used for nearly 6 years, the anastomotic leak rate has been reduced to less than 3%, and predictably, the need for postoperative anasto­motic dilatations concomitantly decreased. Clinically trou­blesome gastroesophageal reflux is unusual after a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis and has occurred in less than 8% of these patients. Our results support our contention that a thoracic incision is seldom required to resect the esophagus for either benign or malignant disease. Transhiatal esophagectomy is safe and well tolerated if performed with care and for proper indications.
FURTHER READING
Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal
resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a metaanalysis. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2001; 72: 306–13.
Orringer MB. Partial median sternotomy: anterior approach to the upper
thoracic esophagus. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1984; 87: 124–9.
Orringer MB, Bluett M, Deeb GM. Aggressive treatment of chylothorax
complicating transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Surgery 1988; 104: 720–6.
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy:
clinical experience and refinements. Annals of Surgery 1999; 230: 392–400.
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical
esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2000; 119: 277–88.
Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Journal of
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1978; 76: 643–54.
39
https://t.me/med1917
Long esophageal myotomy and excision of diverticula
ANDRÉ DURANCEAU MD
Professor, Department of Surgery, Université de Montreal; Chair, Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
PRINCIPLES AND JUSTIFICATION
Pulsion diverticula of the distal esophagus are considered to be complications of abnormal intraesophageal pressures. The work of Cross and colleagues supported the concept that spasm of the inferior sphincter accompanied by increased contraction pressures in the esophageal body is responsible for both the symptoms and the appearance of the diverticu­lum. Allen and Claggett and Benacci et al. have reported significantly fewer leaks with secondary sepsis when a myotomy is combined with diverticulectomy than when a diverticulectomy alone is performed. When surgical treat­ment is indicated for a distal esophageal diverticulum, the diverticulum should be excised if it is large enough and the underlying motor abnormality corrected. After myotomy, a significant weakening of the gastroesophageal junction results, and an antireflux repair is added to the myotomy to prevent reflux damage to the esophageal mucosa. A partial fundoplication is preferred, as a more complete wrap causes functional obstruction to an esophagus made powerless by the myotomy.
Indications
Significant symptoms related to swallowing and to the pres­ence of the diverticulum constitute the main indication for surgical treatment. Asymptomatic diverticula do not require operative treatment.
PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT AND PREPARATION
Assessment
Radiological assessment is important to identify the size and location of the diverticulum. Videoscopic radiography usu­ally allows visualization of the accompanying motor dysfunc­tion. Although optional, radionuclide transit studies using liquid and solid markers quantify esophageal retention.
Esophageal motility studies are essential to characterize the motor disorder accompanying the diverticulum and to deter­mine the extent of dysfunction.
Endoscopy and 24-hour pH monitoring are important to rule out reflux disease and mucosal damage or other mucosal abnormality.
Patient preparation
The patient is put on a liquid diet for 24 hours before the operation. If there is any possibility of significant esophageal retention, lavage of the esophageal cavity is performed with the patient awake on the morning of the operation.
A cephalosporin and antibiotics active against anaerobes (such as metronidazole [Flagyl], 500 mg, or clindamycin, 600 mg) are administered before induction of anesthesia. Subcutaneous heparin sodium, 5 000 U, is administered routinely 2 hours before the operation and every 12 hours thereafter until the patient is fully ambulatory and ready to leave the hospital.