Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_747_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
304 Mediastinal lymph node dissection
https://t.me/med1917
SUBCARINAL DISSECTION
The subcarinal dissection is begun by retracting the lung
anteriorly. The pleura is opened in the posterior hilum in a
caudal direction midway between the anterior border of the
esophagus and the medial border of the bronchus intermedius beginning at the caudal margin of the azygos vein
(Figure 4). The pleural edge overlying the esophagus is
grasped and retracted posteriorly. After ligation and division
of small branches of the vagus nerve and bronchial arteries
crossing the subcarinal area, the right and left main stem,
upper lobe, and bronchus intermedius are exposed with blunt
INFERIOR PULMONARY LIGAMENT DISSECTION
Lymph nodes along the length of the esophagus (paraesophageal nodes) from the level of the azygos vein to the
5
diaphragm are removed and labeled as level 8. Removal is
accomplished by opening the overlying pleura. The inferior
pulmonary ligament should be divided close to the lung, and
any lymph tissue in the ligament should be removed and
labeled as level 9. Level 11 (interlobar) and level 12 (lobar)
lymph nodes are excised with the specimen and should be
identified by the pathologist. This figure depicts the paraesophageal (level 8), inferior pulmonary ligament (level 9),
and nonhilar (levels 11 and 12) mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The view is as by a right posterolateral thoracotomy.
The numbers correspond with those explained in detail in
Table 28.1.
The previously placed packs are removed, and hemostasis
is double-checked. At the completion of the procedure, the
lymph node dissection sites should be inspected again.
dissection. The floor of the dissection is the posterior pericardium, and it is carried superiorly until the carina is
reached. Posteriorly, the lymph nodes are dissected off the
esophagus. Care should be taken to preserve the vagus nerves.
At the apex of the subcarinal triangle are several nourishing
blood vessels of the subcarinal lymph nodes that need to be
identified to ensure hemostasis before removing the subcarinal lymph node packet. I usually ligate these vessels rather
than clipping them. These lymph nodes are labeled as level 7.
A warm gauze pad can be placed in the subcarinal space to
enhance hemostasis.
Phrenic
nerve
Level 11
and 12
nodes
Azygos
vein
Vagus
nerve
Level 8
nodes
Inferior
pulmonary vein
Level 8
nodes
Inferior
pulmonary
ligament
Level 9
nodes
COMPLETE LYMPH NODE DISSECTION FOR A LEFT
THORACOTOMY
SUPERIOR MEDIASTINAL DISSECTION
The dissection is begun by incising the mediastinal pleura
between the phrenic and vagus nerves. Lymph nodes between
the phrenic and vagus nerves, anterior to the ascending aorta
or the innominate artery, are removed and labeled level 6. For
patients with documented tumors at stations 2L and 4L, the
operation is usually best performed through a median vertical
5
sternotomy being the floor of dissection of the interaorticocaval groove. This strategy permits a complete exenteration of
the anterosuperior mediastinum and the enclosed lymph
node stations, as well as the resection of stations 2R and 4R
and the subcarinal lymph nodes. Although they are more
technically demanding, all major pulmonary resections can
be safely made through the same incision except for resection
of lower lobe tumors, for which a separate anterolateral thoracotomy in the fifth space can be made.

AORTOPULMONARY WINDOW DISSECTION
https://t.me/med1917
Dissection is continued into the aortopulmonary
6
window. The compartment between the aorta and the
pulmonary artery should be cleared of lymph tissue and
labeled as level 5. These lymph nodes are lateral to the ligamentum arteriosum and proximal to the first branch of the
left pulmonary artery. The recurrent laryngeal nerve is identified and preserved. Cautery should be avoided to prevent
thermal injury to all these nerves. This figure depicts the aortopulmonary window (level 5), para-aortic (level 6), subcarinal (level 7), and paraesophageal (level 8) mediastinal
lymphadenectomy in the left hemithorax.
Resection of stations 2L and 4L requires mobilization of
the aortic arch and left tracheobronchial angle. Numbers correspond with those explained in detail in Table 28.1.
Superior
intercostal
vein
Level 6
nodes
Left
superior
pulmonary
vein
Phrenic
nerve
Heart
Postoperative care 305
Vagus nerve
Level 5
nodes
Left
pulmonary
artery
Left main
bronchus
Level 7
nodes
Aorta
Level 8
nodes
Left
inferior
pulmonary
vein
SUBCARINAL DISSECTION
The entire lymph node packet underneath the left main stem
bronchus, down to the right main stem bronchus, should be
removed and labeled as 7 (subcarinal lymph nodes). In the
subcarinal area, the dissection is begun by retracting the lung
anteriorly and opening the pleura lying between the esophagus and the main bronchus. The only difference from the
right side dissection is that the subcarinal space lies deeper on
the left than on the right, which renders the access more laborious. A warm gauze pad can be placed in the subcarinal space
to enhance hemostasis.
HILAR DISSECTION
Anteriorly, along the left main stem bronchus, between the
carina and the left upper lobe bronchus, lymph nodes that are
within the left pleural cavity are removed and labeled 10L.
These are intrapleural lymph nodes (N1) medial to the ligamentum. Dissection should be continued proximally along
the left main bronchus to the tracheobronchial angle, and
after division of the ligamentum arteriosum; these mediastinal nodes are removed and labeled 4L.
6
removed and labeled as level 8. Care should be taken to
carefully dissect the overlying pleura between the esophagus
and aorta, especially when the normal anatomical
relations are distorted by concurrent inflammation or tumor
modifications. The previously placed packs are removed
and hemostasis is double-checked. At the completion of the
procedure, the lymph node dissection sites should be
inspected again.
Extended lymph node dissection
The extended lymph node dissection includes the following
in addition to the steps described for the radical lymphadenectomy. On the right, all soft tissue lying in the superior
mediastinum and in front of the SVC up to both brachiocephalic veins is removed; the right subclavian artery, right
recurrent nerve, and ascending aorta are skeletonized; and
the thoracic ductus is ligated. On the left, stations 2 and 4 are
removed after dissection and division of the ligamentum
arteriosum and mobilization of the aortic arch.
Supraclavicular lymphadenectomy is performed.
INFERIOR PULMONARY LIGAMENT DISSECTION
The inferior pulmonary ligament is divided, and all lymph
nodes included in it are completely removed and labeled as
level 9L. All lymph nodes along the esophagus (paraesophageal nodes) from the aortic arch to the diaphragm are
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
Although complications can potentially occur after a complete mediastinal dissection, with careful attention to all technical details, the morbidity of the procedure is minimal and is

306 Mediastinal lymph node dissection
https://t.me/med1917
not significantly different from that observed after systematic
node sampling. The only major complications observable in
patients who have neoadjuvant therapy before surgery is the
likelihood of developing lung edema after removal of all ipsilateral and contralateral lymph node draining stations.
Adequate intra- and postoperative fluid restriction, however,
can minimize this problem.
OUTCOME
A multicenter randomized trial has shown that, mediastinal
systematic sampling was as efficacious as complete mediastinal lymph node dissection in staging patients with NSCLC.
However, complete mediastinal lymph node dissection identified significantly more levels of N2 disease, and complete
mediastinal lymph node dissection was associated with
improved survival with right NSCLC when compared with
systematic sampling in patients with stage II and IIIa tumors.
Whether complete mediastinal lymph node dissection is
superior to node sampling for patients with N0 or N1 (less
than hilar) disease is currently being investigated in an open
randomized trial sponsored by the American College of
Surgeons Oncology Group.
FURTHER READING
Berlangieri SU, Scott AM. Metabolic staging of lung cancer. New
England Journal of Medicine 2000; 343: 290–2.
Hata E, Hayakawa K, Miyamoto H, et al. Rationale for extended
lymphadenectomy for lung cancer. Thoracic Surgery 1990; 5: 19–25.
Keller S, Adak S, Wagner H, Johnson D. Mediastinal lymph node
dissection improves survival in patients with stages II and IIIa nonsmall lung cancer. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2000; 70: 358–65.
Lung Cancer Study Group. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited
resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Annals of Thoracic
Surgery 1995; 60: 615–23.
Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung
cancer staging. Chest 1997; 111: 1718–23
Naruke T. Significance of lymph node metastases in lung cancer.
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1993; 5: 510–18.
Watanabe Y, Shimizu J, Tsubota M, Iwa T. Mediastinal spread of
metastatic lymph nodes in bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest 1990; 97:
1059–63.

29
https://t.me/med1917
The pericardium
JOHN C. KUCHARCZUK MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
HISTORY
Throughout antiquity, the pericardium and heart were considered “off limits” by physicians. In 1766 Morgagni
described the entity we now refer to as cardiac tamponade.
This condition was recognized as usually fatal, and no interventions were attempted. In 1801, Francisco Romero performed the first pericardial procedure for “hydropericardio.”
Romero did not report his experience until 1815 when he
presented two pericardial drainage procedures and five open
pleural drainage procedures to the Society of the School of
Medicine in Paris. Baron Dominique-Jean Larrey, Napolean’s
chief surgeon, is credited with performing and reporting the
first surgical procedure on the pericardium in 1810, 5 years
prior to Romero’s presentation in Paris. The American surgeon Claude Schaeffer Beck recognized the clinical triad of
high venous pressure, hypotension, and distant heart sounds
associated with cardiac tamponade in 1935. This constellation of findings is referred to as Beck’s triad.
Modern surgeons are presented with a number of diagnostic and therapeutic options in dealing with pericardial effusions, pericardial tamponade, and constrictive pericardial
processes. This chapter will review the surgical approaches to
the pericardium including subxiphoid pericardial window,
thoracoscopic-assisted pericardial window, and transsternal
pericardial resection. Special attention will be directed towards
the indications for selecting one approach over another.
PRINCIPLES AND JUSTIFICATION
The goals of performing the pericardial window are: to relieve
impending tamponade; to determine the underlying cause
for fluid in the pericardium; and to prevent the re-accumulation of fluid. Thus, a surgical pericardial window can be diag-
nostic, therapeutic, or both. In the setting of penetrating
trauma to the chest with subsequent concern for cardiac
injury, the presence of blood in the pericardium during the
performance of a pericardial window confirms the diagnosis
of cardiac injury and the need for cardiac repair. In patients
with advanced malignancy, relief of impending cardiac tamponade due to a malignant pericardial effusion can be life saving, and obliteration of the pericardial space can result in
significant palliation. In patients with infected pericardial
collections, drainage can result in isolation of the offending
pathogen and guide antimicrobial therapy.
The pericardium is composed of fibrous tissue and a
serosal surface. A potential space exists between the serosal
surface of the pericardium and the epicardium of the heart.
Accumulation of fluid within this potential space causes
increasing intrapericardial pressure and results in compression of the lower pressure right heart with overall decreased
cardiac filling. This pathophysiology accounts for the clinically observed pulsus paradoxus consisting of a fall in arterial
pressure of greater than 10 mmHg during inspiration. The
diagnosis of impending cardiac tamponade can be made on
clinical grounds (Beck’s triad), although imaging studies are
almost always obtained for confirmation prior to surgery.
The echocardiogram has become the standard for diagnosis
of pericardial fluid and impending pericardial tamponade. A
confirmatory study includes: diastolic compression or collapse of the right atrial or ventricular wall, leftward shift of the
ventricular septum during inspiration, and an inspiratory
decrease in left ventricular size. Small pericardial effusions
which accumulate rapidly are often symptomatic. This situation occurs when the elastic limit of the pericardium is
exceeded, and the intrapericardial pressure rises quickly. By
contrast, effusions that accumulate slowly over long periods
of time, such as those with renal failure, may reach very large
sizes without symptoms. This scenario occurs because the

308 The pericardium
https://t.me/med1917
pericardium slowly stretches, thus minimizing the increase in
intrapericardial pressure and the hemodynamic effects of the
effusion.
Constrictive pericarditis results from chronic inflammation with fibrosis of the pericardium. Often, the serosal surface of the pericardium fuses to the epicardium of the heart
and calcifies. This fusion results in compression of the ventricles with impaired diastolic filling. Patients are usually symptomatic with shortness of breath, hepatomegaly, abdominal
ascites, and lower extremity edema. In advanced cases
myocardial atrophy and fibrosis occurs. Differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive myocardial fibrosis can
be difficult. Nevertheless, the distinction is of paramount
importance as patients with restrictive myocardial fibrosis
will not benefit from pericardial resection.
ANESTHESIA
The safe induction of anesthesia in patients with impending
tamponade can be challenging for the patient, surgeon, and
anesthesiologist. When required, the subxiphoid pericardial
window can be performed under local anesthesia with light
sedation; the alternative approaches to the pericardium
require a general anesthetic. The hypotension associated with
the induction of traditional anesthetics can result in complete
cardiovascular collapse and death. For patients with impend-
ing tamponade, we select a subxiphoid approach. The patient
is prepared for surgery awake with the head of the bed elevated 45 degrees. The operating surgeon is scrubbed, and a
pericardiocentesis needle is available for emergency use prior
to the administration of any anesthesia. Induction agents
such as etomidate are selected for their minimal hemodynamic effects. Once the patient is anesthetized, the airway is
secured and the procedure completed. Performing a pericardial window for impending tamponade requires cooperation
and communication between the anesthesiologist and operating surgeon.
For patients without impending tamponade, alternative
surgical approaches may be chosen. A video-assisted thoracoscopic procedure may be indicated in patients with a concomitant pleural effusion or those with a failed prior
subxiphoid window. This approach requires a general anesthetic and placement of either a double-lumen endotracheal
tube or bronchial blocker for isolated lung ventilation.
Following induction of anesthesia and control of the airway,
the patient must be repositioned into the lateral decubitus
position for the procedure.
Those patients with constrictive pericardium are
approached via a median sternotomy under general anesthesia. Most pericardectomies are performed without the aide of
cardiopulmonary bypass; nevertheless, it should be immediately available should a coronary artery or significant myocardial injury occur.
OPERATION
Subxiphoid pericardial window
The patient is positioned in a supine manner with both
1
arms tucked. The procedure can be performed under
local anesthesia if needed, though most are performed under
a general anesthetic. A 4 cm incision is centered over the
xiphoid process. Electrocautery is used to achieve hemostasis
in the subcutaneous tissues and dissect down directly onto
the xiphoid. Care is taken to avoid inadvertent entry into the
peritoneal cavity.
Skin incision
1

Operation 309
Sternum
(Xiphoid excised)
Pericardium
Diaphragm
Cut edge of
pericardium
Pericardial
window
https://t.me/med1917
Exposure is improved by the routine removal of the
2
xiphoid process. The tip of the xiphoid is grasped with a
Kocher clamp, mobilized completely with electrocautery, and
removed with heavy scissors. A small self-retaining retractor
is used to retract the subcutaneous tissues. The pericardium is
often covered with a layer of adipose tissue. Dissection is continued until the pericardial membrane is visualized. Exposure
is aided by downward traction applied by a “sponge on a
stick.” In patients with significant pericardial effusions the
membrane appears tense and bulging. The pericardium is
grasped, and a 1 cm incision is made with a scalpel. The cut
edge is grasped, and a large rectangular portion of the pericardium is removed with a scissors. The pericardial tissue and
pericardial fluid samples are sent to pathology and to microbiology for further analysis. A finger is introduced into the
pericardium to assess for tumor implants and to break up any
loculation.
2

310 The pericardium
https://t.me/med1917
A 28 French right angled chest tube is placed through a
3
separate stab incision and directed into the pericardium.
The wound is closed in layers with special attention to closure
of the linea alba to avoid future epigastric hernia formation.
The tube is placed to suction and remains in place for 4–5
days to effect obliteration of the pericardial space by sclerosis.
Adjuvant use of sclerosing agents is not required.
Pericardial
window
Diaphragm
In patients with penetrating thoracic trauma, a blue pericardial membrane confirms the presence of pericardial blood
and should prompt conversion to median sternotomy.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic pericardial window
Patients selected for a video-assisted thoracoscopic pericardial window should be hemodynamically stable and must be
able to tolerate single lung ventilation. As the initial approach
to a symptomatic pericardial effusion, the thoracoscopic
approach has no role. The value of a thoracoscopic approach
is the ability to examine, biopsy, and treat associated pleural
or parenchymal lung processes. A thoracoscopic approach is
also of benefit in patients who recur with loculated posterior
pericardial effusions following a subxiphoid approach and
echocardiographic evidence of obliteration of the anterior
pericardial space.
The patient is positioned supine, and general anesthesia is
induced. A double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial
blocker is positioned for isolated lung ventilation during the
Angled tube in
pericardium
3
procedure. Once the airway is secured, the patient is placed in
a lateral decubitus position, and the table is flexed.
Thoracoscopic pericardial window creation has been
described from both the right and left chest. In our experience, visualization is much better and the procedure much
easier when performed from the right side. Ultimately, the
side for thoracoscopic approach is dictated by the associated
pathology, for example an associated pleural effusion which
needs to be drained.
A 3 cm incision is made overlying the eighth intercostal
space in line with the anterior superior iliac spine.
Electrocautery is used to achieve hemostasis in the subcutaneous tissues. Isolated lung ventilation is begun, and the airway on the operative side is opened to atmospheric pressure.
The pleural cavity is entered with a dissecting finger to avoid
lung injury. The thoracoscope is introduced and pleural
examination carried out. Two additional working port sites
are made, one in the fifth intercostal space just below the tip
of the scapula and one more anteriorly in the third intercostal
space. The thoracoscope is moved to the fifth intercostal
space site.

The lung is allowed to fall posteriorly by slightly rotating
Right
phrenic
nerve
Thoracoscope
with video
camera
https://t.me/med1917
4
the table. The phrenic nerve is identified and protected
throughout its course. A location anterior to the phrenic
nerve is selected; the pericardium is grasped and incised. The
cut edge is grasped, and fluid samples are obtained. A large
rectangular portion of the pericardium is removed with an
endoscopic shear. A chest tube is placed through the camera
port site and directed across the pleural cavity and into the
pericardial window. Alternatively, separate pericardial and
pleural tubes can be placed. Bilateral lung ventilation is
resumed, and the port sites are closed. The pericardial tube
remains in place for 4–5 days on suction and then is removed.
As with the subxiphoid approach, the success of this procedure relies on drainage of the pericardium with subsequent
obliteration of the pericardial space by sclerosis.
Operation 311
Transsternal pericardiectomy for constrictive
pericarditis
The patient is positioned in a supine manner with both arms
tucked. A roll is placed under the shoulders. A median sternotomy incision is made, and the thymus gland is resected.
Cardiopulmonary bypass is not routinely used but is immediately available should a malignant arrhythmia occur or if a
coronary artery is injured.
4
A small incision is made in the pericardium with a scalpel
to the left of the anterior descending coronary artery. The incision is very carefully deepened to the level of the myocardium,
and a dissection plane is established. Release of the left heart
prior to the right ventricle is important to avoid pulmonary
edema.

312 The pericardium
Thickened
pericardium
Diaphragm
Pericardium
removed
from anterior
left ventricle
Left phrenic
nerve
https://t.me/med1917
Dissection is continued in a lateral fashion to the border
5
of the left phrenic nerve; the phrenic nerve is preserved;
and the strip of pericardium elevated from the anterior left
ventricle is removed.
Atrioventricular
groove
Right
atrium
Right
ventricle
5
Next, the inferior portion of the left ventricle is released
6
by establishing a plane between the myocardium and
diaphragm. Following this maneuver, the right ventricle is
released up past the atrioventricular groove.
6

Further reading 313
https://t.me/med1917
The operation is completed by retracting the heart to the
7
right and releasing the pericardium overlying the lateral
left ventricle posterior to the left phrenic nerve and down to
the level of the pulmonary veins. Hemostasis is confirmed,
and the sternotomy is closed over drains.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
The postoperative care of patients following a pericardial
window is straightforward. A pericardial tube is left in place
and on suction for 5 days. It is then removed. The majority of
patients have dramatic improvement in their hemodynamics
and symptoms immediately following surgery. A failure to
respond immediately to drainage should raise concerns over
the validity of the preoperative diagnosis and prompt a search
for alternative explanations.
The postoperative care of patients following pericardial
resection for constrictive pericarditis revolves around hemodynamic stabilization. This procedure often results in significant blood loss, and intraoperative as well as postoperative
blood transfusions may be required. Mediastinal drains are
monitored closely for ongoing bleeding and the need for reexploration.
Phrenic nerve
Left pulmonary
veins
Lateral left
ventricle
7
quickly with the patient in a supine position and without the
need for isolated lung ventilation as required for the thoracoscopic approach. When required, this procedure can be performed under local anesthesia. This approach provides
durable palliation of symptoms in greater than 90% of
patients with malignant effusions.
Transsternal pericardial resection is a highly effective treatment for relief of symptoms in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Nevertheless, the procedure does carry significant
perioperative mortality rates of about 5%. Long-term results
are mixed depending on the etiology of the constrictive
process. The long-term outcome is predicted by age, NYHA
classification at presentation, and previous chest radiation.
Patients with radiation-induced disease have the worst longterm outcome.
FURTHER READING
OUTCOME
A subxiphoid pericardial window is highly sensitive in ruling
out occult cardiac injury in patients with penetrating chest
trauma. Although many patients with penetrating cardiac
trauma die prior to reaching the hospital, up to 20% of those
arriving in the emergency room hemodynamically stable with
a high risk trajectory will have an occult cardiac injury. The
subxiphoid pericardial window can be performed quickly
with high predictive value. If intrapericardial blood is present,
the incision can easily be extended to a median sternotomy
for definitive repair of the cardiac injury.
In patients with malignant pericardial effusions, the sub-
xiphoid approach is preferred. The procedure is performed
Andrade-Alegre R. Mon L. Subxiphoid pericardial window in the
diagnosis of penetrating cardiac trauma. Annals of Thoracic Surgery
1994; 58: 1139–41
Aris A. Francisco Romero, the first heart surgeon. Annals of Thoracic
Surgery 1997; 64: 870–1.
Hancock WE. Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and
constrictive pericarditis. Heart 2001; 86: 343–9.
Johnson SB, Nielsen JL, Sako EY, Calhoon JH, Trinkle JK, Miller OL.
Penetrating intrapericardial wounds: clinical experience with a
surgical protocol. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1995; 60: 117–201
Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB, Tajik
AJ. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical
spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation
1999; 100: 1380–6.
Shumacker HB Jr. When did cardiac surgery begin? Journal of
Cardiovascular Surgery 1989; 30: 246–9.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
