Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_747_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
304 Mediastinal lymph node dissection
https://t.me/med1917
SUBCARINAL DISSECTION
The subcarinal dissection is begun by retracting the lung anteriorly. The pleura is opened in the posterior hilum in a caudal direction midway between the anterior border of the esophagus and the medial border of the bronchus inter­medius beginning at the caudal margin of the azygos vein (Figure 4). The pleural edge overlying the esophagus is grasped and retracted posteriorly. After ligation and division of small branches of the vagus nerve and bronchial arteries crossing the subcarinal area, the right and left main stem, upper lobe, and bronchus intermedius are exposed with blunt
INFERIOR PULMONARY LIGAMENT DISSECTION
Lymph nodes along the length of the esophagus (para­esophageal nodes) from the level of the azygos vein to the
5
diaphragm are removed and labeled as level 8. Removal is accomplished by opening the overlying pleura. The inferior pulmonary ligament should be divided close to the lung, and any lymph tissue in the ligament should be removed and labeled as level 9. Level 11 (interlobar) and level 12 (lobar) lymph nodes are excised with the specimen and should be identified by the pathologist. This figure depicts the para­esophageal (level 8), inferior pulmonary ligament (level 9), and nonhilar (levels 11 and 12) mediastinal lymphadenec­tomy. The view is as by a right posterolateral thoracotomy. The numbers correspond with those explained in detail in Table 28.1.
The previously placed packs are removed, and hemostasis is double-checked. At the completion of the procedure, the lymph node dissection sites should be inspected again.
dissection. The floor of the dissection is the posterior peri­cardium, and it is carried superiorly until the carina is reached. Posteriorly, the lymph nodes are dissected off the esophagus. Care should be taken to preserve the vagus nerves. At the apex of the subcarinal triangle are several nourishing blood vessels of the subcarinal lymph nodes that need to be identified to ensure hemostasis before removing the sub­carinal lymph node packet. I usually ligate these vessels rather than clipping them. These lymph nodes are labeled as level 7. A warm gauze pad can be placed in the subcarinal space to enhance hemostasis.
Phrenic nerve
Level 11 and 12 nodes
Azygos vein
Vagus nerve
Level 8 nodes
Inferior pulmonary vein
Level 8 nodes
Inferior pulmonary ligament
Level 9 nodes
COMPLETE LYMPH NODE DISSECTION FOR A LEFT THORACOTOMY
SUPERIOR MEDIASTINAL DISSECTION
The dissection is begun by incising the mediastinal pleura between the phrenic and vagus nerves. Lymph nodes between the phrenic and vagus nerves, anterior to the ascending aorta or the innominate artery, are removed and labeled level 6. For patients with documented tumors at stations 2L and 4L, the operation is usually best performed through a median vertical
5
sternotomy being the floor of dissection of the interaortico­caval groove. This strategy permits a complete exenteration of the anterosuperior mediastinum and the enclosed lymph node stations, as well as the resection of stations 2R and 4R and the subcarinal lymph nodes. Although they are more technically demanding, all major pulmonary resections can be safely made through the same incision except for resection of lower lobe tumors, for which a separate anterolateral tho­racotomy in the fifth space can be made.
AORTOPULMONARY WINDOW DISSECTION
https://t.me/med1917
Dissection is continued into the aortopulmonary
6
window. The compartment between the aorta and the pulmonary artery should be cleared of lymph tissue and labeled as level 5. These lymph nodes are lateral to the liga­mentum arteriosum and proximal to the first branch of the left pulmonary artery. The recurrent laryngeal nerve is identi­fied and preserved. Cautery should be avoided to prevent thermal injury to all these nerves. This figure depicts the aor­topulmonary window (level 5), para-aortic (level 6), subcari­nal (level 7), and paraesophageal (level 8) mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the left hemithorax.
Resection of stations 2L and 4L requires mobilization of the aortic arch and left tracheobronchial angle. Numbers cor­respond with those explained in detail in Table 28.1.
Superior intercostal vein
Level 6 nodes
Left superior pulmonary vein
Phrenic nerve
Heart
Postoperative care 305
Vagus nerve
Level 5 nodes
Left pulmonary artery
Left main bronchus
Level 7 nodes
Aorta
Level 8 nodes
Left inferior pulmonary vein
SUBCARINAL DISSECTION
The entire lymph node packet underneath the left main stem bronchus, down to the right main stem bronchus, should be removed and labeled as 7 (subcarinal lymph nodes). In the subcarinal area, the dissection is begun by retracting the lung anteriorly and opening the pleura lying between the esopha­gus and the main bronchus. The only difference from the right side dissection is that the subcarinal space lies deeper on the left than on the right, which renders the access more labo­rious. A warm gauze pad can be placed in the subcarinal space to enhance hemostasis.
HILAR DISSECTION
Anteriorly, along the left main stem bronchus, between the carina and the left upper lobe bronchus, lymph nodes that are within the left pleural cavity are removed and labeled 10L. These are intrapleural lymph nodes (N1) medial to the liga­mentum. Dissection should be continued proximally along the left main bronchus to the tracheobronchial angle, and after division of the ligamentum arteriosum; these mediasti­nal nodes are removed and labeled 4L.
6
removed and labeled as level 8. Care should be taken to carefully dissect the overlying pleura between the esophagus and aorta, especially when the normal anatomical relations are distorted by concurrent inflammation or tumor modifications. The previously placed packs are removed and hemostasis is double-checked. At the completion of the procedure, the lymph node dissection sites should be inspected again.
Extended lymph node dissection
The extended lymph node dissection includes the following in addition to the steps described for the radical lymph­adenectomy. On the right, all soft tissue lying in the superior mediastinum and in front of the SVC up to both brachio­cephalic veins is removed; the right subclavian artery, right recurrent nerve, and ascending aorta are skeletonized; and the thoracic ductus is ligated. On the left, stations 2 and 4 are removed after dissection and division of the ligamentum arteriosum and mobilization of the aortic arch. Supraclavicular lymphadenectomy is performed.
INFERIOR PULMONARY LIGAMENT DISSECTION
The inferior pulmonary ligament is divided, and all lymph nodes included in it are completely removed and labeled as level 9L. All lymph nodes along the esophagus (para­esophageal nodes) from the aortic arch to the diaphragm are
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
Although complications can potentially occur after a com­plete mediastinal dissection, with careful attention to all tech­nical details, the morbidity of the procedure is minimal and is
306 Mediastinal lymph node dissection
https://t.me/med1917
not significantly different from that observed after systematic node sampling. The only major complications observable in patients who have neoadjuvant therapy before surgery is the likelihood of developing lung edema after removal of all ipsi­lateral and contralateral lymph node draining stations. Adequate intra- and postoperative fluid restriction, however, can minimize this problem.
OUTCOME
A multicenter randomized trial has shown that, mediastinal systematic sampling was as efficacious as complete mediasti­nal lymph node dissection in staging patients with NSCLC. However, complete mediastinal lymph node dissection iden­tified significantly more levels of N2 disease, and complete mediastinal lymph node dissection was associated with improved survival with right NSCLC when compared with systematic sampling in patients with stage II and IIIa tumors. Whether complete mediastinal lymph node dissection is superior to node sampling for patients with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) disease is currently being investigated in an open
randomized trial sponsored by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group.
FURTHER READING
Berlangieri SU, Scott AM. Metabolic staging of lung cancer. New
England Journal of Medicine 2000; 343: 290–2.
Hata E, Hayakawa K, Miyamoto H, et al. Rationale for extended
lymphadenectomy for lung cancer. Thoracic Surgery 1990; 5: 19–25.
Keller S, Adak S, Wagner H, Johnson D. Mediastinal lymph node
dissection improves survival in patients with stages II and IIIa non­small lung cancer. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2000; 70: 358–65.
Lung Cancer Study Group. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited
resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1995; 60: 615–23.
Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung
cancer staging. Chest 1997; 111: 1718–23
Naruke T. Significance of lymph node metastases in lung cancer.
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1993; 5: 510–18.
Watanabe Y, Shimizu J, Tsubota M, Iwa T. Mediastinal spread of
metastatic lymph nodes in bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest 1990; 97: 1059–63.
29
https://t.me/med1917
The pericardium
JOHN C. KUCHARCZUK MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
HISTORY
Throughout antiquity, the pericardium and heart were con­sidered “off limits” by physicians. In 1766 Morgagni described the entity we now refer to as cardiac tamponade. This condition was recognized as usually fatal, and no inter­ventions were attempted. In 1801, Francisco Romero per­formed the first pericardial procedure for “hydropericardio.” Romero did not report his experience until 1815 when he presented two pericardial drainage procedures and five open pleural drainage procedures to the Society of the School of Medicine in Paris. Baron Dominique-Jean Larrey, Napolean’s chief surgeon, is credited with performing and reporting the first surgical procedure on the pericardium in 1810, 5 years prior to Romero’s presentation in Paris. The American sur­geon Claude Schaeffer Beck recognized the clinical triad of high venous pressure, hypotension, and distant heart sounds associated with cardiac tamponade in 1935. This constella­tion of findings is referred to as Beck’s triad.
Modern surgeons are presented with a number of diagnos­tic and therapeutic options in dealing with pericardial effu­sions, pericardial tamponade, and constrictive pericardial processes. This chapter will review the surgical approaches to the pericardium including subxiphoid pericardial window, thoracoscopic-assisted pericardial window, and transsternal pericardial resection. Special attention will be directed towards the indications for selecting one approach over another.
PRINCIPLES AND JUSTIFICATION
The goals of performing the pericardial window are: to relieve impending tamponade; to determine the underlying cause for fluid in the pericardium; and to prevent the re-accumula­tion of fluid. Thus, a surgical pericardial window can be diag-
nostic, therapeutic, or both. In the setting of penetrating trauma to the chest with subsequent concern for cardiac injury, the presence of blood in the pericardium during the performance of a pericardial window confirms the diagnosis of cardiac injury and the need for cardiac repair. In patients with advanced malignancy, relief of impending cardiac tam­ponade due to a malignant pericardial effusion can be life sav­ing, and obliteration of the pericardial space can result in significant palliation. In patients with infected pericardial collections, drainage can result in isolation of the offending pathogen and guide antimicrobial therapy.
The pericardium is composed of fibrous tissue and a serosal surface. A potential space exists between the serosal surface of the pericardium and the epicardium of the heart. Accumulation of fluid within this potential space causes increasing intrapericardial pressure and results in compres­sion of the lower pressure right heart with overall decreased cardiac filling. This pathophysiology accounts for the clini­cally observed pulsus paradoxus consisting of a fall in arterial pressure of greater than 10 mmHg during inspiration. The diagnosis of impending cardiac tamponade can be made on clinical grounds (Beck’s triad), although imaging studies are almost always obtained for confirmation prior to surgery. The echocardiogram has become the standard for diagnosis of pericardial fluid and impending pericardial tamponade. A confirmatory study includes: diastolic compression or col­lapse of the right atrial or ventricular wall, leftward shift of the ventricular septum during inspiration, and an inspiratory decrease in left ventricular size. Small pericardial effusions which accumulate rapidly are often symptomatic. This situa­tion occurs when the elastic limit of the pericardium is exceeded, and the intrapericardial pressure rises quickly. By contrast, effusions that accumulate slowly over long periods of time, such as those with renal failure, may reach very large sizes without symptoms. This scenario occurs because the
308 The pericardium
https://t.me/med1917
pericardium slowly stretches, thus minimizing the increase in intrapericardial pressure and the hemodynamic effects of the effusion.
Constrictive pericarditis results from chronic inflamma­tion with fibrosis of the pericardium. Often, the serosal sur­face of the pericardium fuses to the epicardium of the heart and calcifies. This fusion results in compression of the ventri­cles with impaired diastolic filling. Patients are usually symp­tomatic with shortness of breath, hepatomegaly, abdominal ascites, and lower extremity edema. In advanced cases myocardial atrophy and fibrosis occurs. Differentiating con­strictive pericarditis from restrictive myocardial fibrosis can be difficult. Nevertheless, the distinction is of paramount importance as patients with restrictive myocardial fibrosis will not benefit from pericardial resection.
ANESTHESIA
The safe induction of anesthesia in patients with impending tamponade can be challenging for the patient, surgeon, and anesthesiologist. When required, the subxiphoid pericardial window can be performed under local anesthesia with light sedation; the alternative approaches to the pericardium require a general anesthetic. The hypotension associated with the induction of traditional anesthetics can result in complete cardiovascular collapse and death. For patients with impend-
ing tamponade, we select a subxiphoid approach. The patient is prepared for surgery awake with the head of the bed ele­vated 45 degrees. The operating surgeon is scrubbed, and a pericardiocentesis needle is available for emergency use prior to the administration of any anesthesia. Induction agents such as etomidate are selected for their minimal hemody­namic effects. Once the patient is anesthetized, the airway is secured and the procedure completed. Performing a pericar­dial window for impending tamponade requires cooperation and communication between the anesthesiologist and oper­ating surgeon.
For patients without impending tamponade, alternative surgical approaches may be chosen. A video-assisted thoraco­scopic procedure may be indicated in patients with a con­comitant pleural effusion or those with a failed prior subxiphoid window. This approach requires a general anes­thetic and placement of either a double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker for isolated lung ventilation. Following induction of anesthesia and control of the airway, the patient must be repositioned into the lateral decubitus position for the procedure.
Those patients with constrictive pericardium are approached via a median sternotomy under general anesthe­sia. Most pericardectomies are performed without the aide of cardiopulmonary bypass; nevertheless, it should be immedi­ately available should a coronary artery or significant myocar­dial injury occur.
OPERATION
Subxiphoid pericardial window
The patient is positioned in a supine manner with both
1
arms tucked. The procedure can be performed under local anesthesia if needed, though most are performed under a general anesthetic. A 4 cm incision is centered over the xiphoid process. Electrocautery is used to achieve hemostasis in the subcutaneous tissues and dissect down directly onto the xiphoid. Care is taken to avoid inadvertent entry into the peritoneal cavity.
Skin incision
1
Operation 309
Sternum (Xiphoid excised)
Pericardium
Diaphragm
Cut edge of pericardium
Pericardial window
https://t.me/med1917
Exposure is improved by the routine removal of the
2
xiphoid process. The tip of the xiphoid is grasped with a Kocher clamp, mobilized completely with electrocautery, and removed with heavy scissors. A small self-retaining retractor is used to retract the subcutaneous tissues. The pericardium is often covered with a layer of adipose tissue. Dissection is con­tinued until the pericardial membrane is visualized. Exposure is aided by downward traction applied by a “sponge on a stick.” In patients with significant pericardial effusions the membrane appears tense and bulging. The pericardium is grasped, and a 1 cm incision is made with a scalpel. The cut edge is grasped, and a large rectangular portion of the peri­cardium is removed with a scissors. The pericardial tissue and pericardial fluid samples are sent to pathology and to micro­biology for further analysis. A finger is introduced into the pericardium to assess for tumor implants and to break up any loculation.
2
310 The pericardium
https://t.me/med1917
A 28 French right angled chest tube is placed through a
3
separate stab incision and directed into the pericardium. The wound is closed in layers with special attention to closure of the linea alba to avoid future epigastric hernia formation. The tube is placed to suction and remains in place for 4–5 days to effect obliteration of the pericardial space by sclerosis. Adjuvant use of sclerosing agents is not required.
Pericardial window
Diaphragm
In patients with penetrating thoracic trauma, a blue pericar­dial membrane confirms the presence of pericardial blood and should prompt conversion to median sternotomy.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic pericardial window
Patients selected for a video-assisted thoracoscopic pericar­dial window should be hemodynamically stable and must be able to tolerate single lung ventilation. As the initial approach to a symptomatic pericardial effusion, the thoracoscopic approach has no role. The value of a thoracoscopic approach is the ability to examine, biopsy, and treat associated pleural or parenchymal lung processes. A thoracoscopic approach is also of benefit in patients who recur with loculated posterior pericardial effusions following a subxiphoid approach and echocardiographic evidence of obliteration of the anterior pericardial space.
The patient is positioned supine, and general anesthesia is induced. A double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker is positioned for isolated lung ventilation during the
Angled tube in pericardium
3
procedure. Once the airway is secured, the patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position, and the table is flexed. Thoracoscopic pericardial window creation has been described from both the right and left chest. In our experi­ence, visualization is much better and the procedure much easier when performed from the right side. Ultimately, the side for thoracoscopic approach is dictated by the associated pathology, for example an associated pleural effusion which needs to be drained.
A 3 cm incision is made overlying the eighth intercostal space in line with the anterior superior iliac spine. Electrocautery is used to achieve hemostasis in the subcuta­neous tissues. Isolated lung ventilation is begun, and the air­way on the operative side is opened to atmospheric pressure. The pleural cavity is entered with a dissecting finger to avoid lung injury. The thoracoscope is introduced and pleural examination carried out. Two additional working port sites are made, one in the fifth intercostal space just below the tip of the scapula and one more anteriorly in the third intercostal space. The thoracoscope is moved to the fifth intercostal space site.
The lung is allowed to fall posteriorly by slightly rotating
Right phrenic nerve
Thoracoscope with video camera
https://t.me/med1917
4
the table. The phrenic nerve is identified and protected throughout its course. A location anterior to the phrenic nerve is selected; the pericardium is grasped and incised. The cut edge is grasped, and fluid samples are obtained. A large rectangular portion of the pericardium is removed with an endoscopic shear. A chest tube is placed through the camera port site and directed across the pleural cavity and into the pericardial window. Alternatively, separate pericardial and pleural tubes can be placed. Bilateral lung ventilation is resumed, and the port sites are closed. The pericardial tube remains in place for 4–5 days on suction and then is removed. As with the subxiphoid approach, the success of this proce­dure relies on drainage of the pericardium with subsequent obliteration of the pericardial space by sclerosis.
Operation 311
Transsternal pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis
The patient is positioned in a supine manner with both arms tucked. A roll is placed under the shoulders. A median ster­notomy incision is made, and the thymus gland is resected. Cardiopulmonary bypass is not routinely used but is immedi­ately available should a malignant arrhythmia occur or if a coronary artery is injured.
4
A small incision is made in the pericardium with a scalpel to the left of the anterior descending coronary artery. The inci­sion is very carefully deepened to the level of the myocardium, and a dissection plane is established. Release of the left heart prior to the right ventricle is important to avoid pulmonary edema.
312 The pericardium
Thickened pericardium
Diaphragm
Pericardium removed from anterior left ventricle
Left phrenic nerve
https://t.me/med1917
Dissection is continued in a lateral fashion to the border
5
of the left phrenic nerve; the phrenic nerve is preserved; and the strip of pericardium elevated from the anterior left ventricle is removed.
Atrioventricular groove
Right atrium
Right ventricle
5
Next, the inferior portion of the left ventricle is released
6
by establishing a plane between the myocardium and diaphragm. Following this maneuver, the right ventricle is released up past the atrioventricular groove.
6
Further reading 313
https://t.me/med1917
The operation is completed by retracting the heart to the
7
right and releasing the pericardium overlying the lateral left ventricle posterior to the left phrenic nerve and down to the level of the pulmonary veins. Hemostasis is confirmed, and the sternotomy is closed over drains.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE
The postoperative care of patients following a pericardial window is straightforward. A pericardial tube is left in place and on suction for 5 days. It is then removed. The majority of patients have dramatic improvement in their hemodynamics and symptoms immediately following surgery. A failure to respond immediately to drainage should raise concerns over the validity of the preoperative diagnosis and prompt a search for alternative explanations.
The postoperative care of patients following pericardial resection for constrictive pericarditis revolves around hemo­dynamic stabilization. This procedure often results in signifi­cant blood loss, and intraoperative as well as postoperative blood transfusions may be required. Mediastinal drains are monitored closely for ongoing bleeding and the need for re­exploration.
Phrenic nerve
Left pulmonary veins
Lateral left ventricle
7
quickly with the patient in a supine position and without the need for isolated lung ventilation as required for the thoraco­scopic approach. When required, this procedure can be per­formed under local anesthesia. This approach provides durable palliation of symptoms in greater than 90% of patients with malignant effusions.
Transsternal pericardial resection is a highly effective treat­ment for relief of symptoms in patients with constrictive peri­carditis. Nevertheless, the procedure does carry significant perioperative mortality rates of about 5%. Long-term results are mixed depending on the etiology of the constrictive process. The long-term outcome is predicted by age, NYHA classification at presentation, and previous chest radiation. Patients with radiation-induced disease have the worst long­term outcome.
FURTHER READING
OUTCOME
A subxiphoid pericardial window is highly sensitive in ruling out occult cardiac injury in patients with penetrating chest trauma. Although many patients with penetrating cardiac trauma die prior to reaching the hospital, up to 20% of those arriving in the emergency room hemodynamically stable with a high risk trajectory will have an occult cardiac injury. The subxiphoid pericardial window can be performed quickly with high predictive value. If intrapericardial blood is present, the incision can easily be extended to a median sternotomy for definitive repair of the cardiac injury.
In patients with malignant pericardial effusions, the sub-
xiphoid approach is preferred. The procedure is performed
Andrade-Alegre R. Mon L. Subxiphoid pericardial window in the
diagnosis of penetrating cardiac trauma. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1994; 58: 1139–41
Aris A. Francisco Romero, the first heart surgeon. Annals of Thoracic
Surgery 1997; 64: 870–1.
Hancock WE. Differential diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy and
constrictive pericarditis. Heart 2001; 86: 343–9.
Johnson SB, Nielsen JL, Sako EY, Calhoon JH, Trinkle JK, Miller OL.
Penetrating intrapericardial wounds: clinical experience with a surgical protocol. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1995; 60: 117–201
Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB, Tajik
AJ. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation 1999; 100: 1380–6.
Shumacker HB Jr. When did cardiac surgery begin? Journal of
Cardiovascular Surgery 1989; 30: 246–9.