Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4446_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
Contents
xv
27 Complications of Functional Endoscopic Sinus
Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
Shanmugam Ganesan, Emad Al Duhirat, Hamad Al Saey,
Mansour Al Sulaiti, Maryam Abdulraheem, Raa Zahid,
and Ahmed Shaikh
28 Neoplasms of the Sinonasal Cavity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
Andrew Tassler, Charles A. Riley, Chetan Sa,
and Michael G. Stewart
29 Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Hamad Al Saey, Ahmed Shaikh, Sara Ashkanani,
Mansour Al Sulaiti, Emad Al Duhirat,
and Shanmugam Ganesan
30 Anterior and Midline Central Skull Base Tumors . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
Sara Ashkanani and Abhishek Menon
31 Epistaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
Ahmed Shaikh, Hamad Al Saey, Sara Ashkanani,
Mashael Alhail, Mansour Al Sulaiti, Maryam Abdulraheem,
Emad Al Duhirat, and Shanmugam Ganesan
32 The Nasal Septum and Turbinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
Mansour Al Sulaiti, Emad Al Duhirat, Hamad Al Saey,
Shanmugam Ganesan, and Abdulaziz Al Jufairi
33 Pitfalls and Pearls in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
Omar M. Bargas and Ahmad AbuAlsoud
Part IV Head and Neck
34 Thyroid and Parathyroid Glands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
Hassan Haidar, Abdelrahman Alsaleh, Waheed Rahman,
and Hussein Enezi
35 Diseases of the Salivary Glands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
Hassan Haidar, Abhishek Menon, and Emad Al Duhirat
36 An Approach to Neck Masses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397
Suzan Saeed Mohamed, Abhishek Menon,
and Waheed Rahman
37 Principles of Management of Head and Neck Cancers . . . . . . . . 409
Anil K. D’Cruz, Richa Vaish, and Harsh Dhar
38 Neoplasms of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
Anil K. D’Cruz, Harsh Dhar, Khuzema Fatehi,
and Richa Vaish
39 Neoplasms of the Larynx and Laryngopharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
Ismail Zohdi, Louay ElSharkawy, and Mahmoud ElBestar

xvi
40 Cancer of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses . . . . . . . . . . . 465
Ahmed Eldaly, Mohammed Hassab, and Ali Al Ansari
41 Nasopharyngeal Cancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
Aisha Larem, Emad Al Duhirat, and Hassan Omer
42 Difficult Airway Management forENT Surgery
forNon-anesthesiologists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
Nabil A. Shallik, Odai Khamash, and Mohammad Al Nobani
Part V Laryngology and Esophagology
43 Physiology of the Voice and Clinical Voice Assessment . . . . . . . . 515
Mayed Radi Alkhafaji and Dina Emam
44 Inflammatory, Infectious, and Acquired Conditions
of the Larynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521
Aisha Larem, Nal Arimbrathodi, and Raa Zahid
45 Benign Lesions of the Vocal Folds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531
Mayed Radi
46 Vocal Cord Paralysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539
Rashid Al-Abri and Suresh Pillai
Contents
47 Dysphagia Disorders Evaluation and Management . . . . . . . . . . 547
Mayed Radi Alkhafaji and Olfa Almannai
48 Esophageal Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
Aisha Larem, Ma’in Ali Al Shawabkeh, and Khalil Sultan
Part VI General Otolaryngology
49 Pharyngitis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 567
Abdulsalam Al-Qahtani and Zaid Altamimi
50 Deep Neck Space Infections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575
Aisha Larem and Adham Aljariri
51 Obstructive Sleep Apnea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 585
Medhat Shams and Hayam AlTaweel
52 ENT Pharmacotherapy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
Aisha Larem, Adham Aljariri, Mouna Ghannam, Ahmed Aly,
Shaban Mohammed, and Sara Shabana
53 Neck Trauma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605
Furat Abbas and Hossam Makki
54 ENT Manifestations in Systemic and Inflammatory
Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 615
Aya Elderee, Ali Al Ansari, Hassan Haidar,
and Mazin Al Khabouri
AL GRAWANY

Contents
xvii
Part VII Pediatrics
55 Anesthetic Considerations forPediatric ENT Surgeries
forNon-anesthesiologists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 627
Nabil A. Shallik, Ahmed Zaghw, Al Moataz Adham,
and Sahar Mahadik
56 Adenoid and Tonsils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 647
Amr A. Elhakeem
57 Branchial Arch: Anatomy and Anomalies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 655
Faisal Abdulkader, Francis J. Lannigan, and Mahmoud Taha
58 Evaluation of Pediatric Head and Neck Masses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663
Faisal Abdulkader and Niveen Eltigani Elmusharaf Mukhtar
59 Pediatric Head and Neck Vascular Anomalies and Tumors . . . . 671
Faisal Abdulkader and Niveen Eltigani Elmusharaf Mukhtar
60 Evaluation of Stridor and Wheezy Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681
Amr A. Elhakeem
61 Managing the Stridulous Child . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 689
Mai Elhassan
62 Congenital and Acquired Disorders of the Larynx . . . . . . . . . . . 695
Aisha Larem, Faisal Abdulkader, Zaid Altamimi,
and Amr A. Elhakeem
63 ENT-Related Syndromes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 707
Faisal Abdulkader and Mai Ahmed Mohamed Elhassan Ahmed
64 Congenital Anomalies of the Nose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 719
Faisal Abdulkader, Francis J. Lannigan, and Mahmoud Taha
65 Cleft Lip and Palate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 729
Dina Emam, Aya Elderee, and Abdelrahman Alsaleh
66 Pediatric Audiology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737
Abdulsalam Al-Qahtani, Reni K. Chandran,
Khaled Abdulhadi, and Zaid Altamimi
Part VIII Facial Plastics
67 Facial Aesthetic Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749
Rani Hammoud and Hassan Haidar
68 Rhinoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 759
Hassan Haidar and Rani Hammoud
69 Otoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 769
Rani Hammoud and Hassan Haidar

xviii
70 Blepharoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 777
Maryam Abdulraheem, Rani Hammoud, Shanmugam
Ganesan, and Alwyn D’Souza
71 Facelifting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783
Rani Hammoud and Hassan Haidar
72 Fillers and Neurotoxins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 791
Maryam Abdulraheem, Rani Hammoud,
Shanmugam Ganesan, and Alwyn D’Souza
Contents
AL GRAWANY

Part I
Audiology

General Audiology
Ma’inAliAl Shawabkeh, HassanHaidar,
andKhaledAbdulhadi
1
1.1 Introduction
Audiological tests are essential in clinical practice as they can guide the management and determine the treatment option for patients. These
tests should always be taken as a battery of tests
and not relying on a single test, as this will help
to give a whole picture of the patient.
1.2 Denitions
• Sound: It is the energy that travels in waves
within a medium (like air). A sound wave is
composed of compression (more dense) and
rarefaction (less dense) waves. Two important
terms related to sound are intensity and
frequency.
• Frequency: It is the number of waves per sec-
ond. Hertz (Hz) is the unit used for measurement of frequency. It is related to the pitch of
the sound. The higher the frequency is, the
more pitch the sound will be. Sound in nature
is complex, which means it is composed of
M. A. Al Shawabkeh · K. Abdelhadi
ENT Department, Hamad Medical Corporation,
Doha, Qatar
e-mail: Khadi@hmc.org.qa
H. Haidar (*)
ENT Department, Hamad Medical Corporation,
Doha, Qatar
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
more than one frequency. Pure tone sound,
that is, sound composed from single frequency, is rarely found in nature but usually
used in audiometer for hearing assessment.
Humans are capable of hearing sounds
between 20 and 20,000Hz [1].
• Noise: It is a complex aperiodic sound; it can
be a white noise if it composed of all the frequencies, a narrow-band noise if it is composed of certain frequencies (above and below
specic frequency), or speech noise if it is
composed of speech frequencies (i.e.,
300–3000Hz).
• Intensity: It is the strength of the sound and
consists of the amount of energy produced in an
area per time. It correlates to the loudness of the
sound. Decibel is the unit used to measure the
intensity or loudness of sounds. The normal
conversation usually is about 60dB, and the
quiet countryside is about 30dB.One hundred
and ten decibel can cause discomfort in the ear,
and 130dB can cause pain in the ears [2].
• Decibel: It is a relative measure of the intensity of sound. It represents a logarithmic
expression of two intensities ratios.
• Sound pressure level (SPL): It is related to the
intensity of the sound and considered an absolute pressure reference level for the decibel.
Zero dB SPL=0.0002dyn/cm
• Hearing level (HL): It is the most common
reference used in audiometers. Zero dB HL
means that normal human ears will perceive
2
.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
A. Al-Qahtani et al. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Otolaryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_1
AL GRAWANY
3

4
M. A. AlShawabkeh et al.
the sound at any given frequency in 50% of
the times.
• Sensation level (SL): Here, the reference is the
threshold for an individual. Zero SL means
that an individual can hear the sound at a given
frequency in 50% of the times.
• Recruitment: It is the abnormal growth of
loudness. It indicates a cochlear hearing loss.
Patients with this condition are poor candidates for hearing aid.
• Most comfortable level: It is the intensity of
the sound that is more comfortable to the
patient.
• Loudness discomfort level: It is the intensity
of the sound that will produce discomfort to
the patient.
• Dynamic range: It is the range between the
loudness discomfort level and the most comfortable level. Patients with recruitment will
have a reduced dynamic range.
1.3 Assessment ofHearing
1.3.1 Clinical Tests
1.3.1.1 Tuning Fork Tests
There are different forks with each having specic
frequencies. There are 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048,
and 4096Hz. Five hundred twelveHertz tuning
fork is the most suitable one used for hearing
assessment, because the one with low frequency
will give a bone vibration sensation that means it
is felt rather than heard, while the one with high
frequencies will give a short decay time [3].
Weber test: It is the test of lateralization; the
tuning fork is put on the middle of the forehead
after being activated, and then assess where the
patient will hear the sound better.
• Normal hearing: there will be no lateralization
of the sound (in the center).
• Unilateral Conductive hearing loss (CHL): he
will lateralize the sound to the diseased ear.
• Unilateral Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL):
the patient lateralizes the sound to the normal
ear.
Table 1.1 Interpretation of negative and positive Rinne
tests’ results of the different types of tuning forks
Degree of
air-bone gap (AB
256Hz 512Hz 1024Hz
Negative
Rinne
Negative
Rinne
Negative
Rinne
Positive
Rinne
Negative
Rinne
Negative
Rinne
Positive
Rinne
Positive
Rinne
Negative
Rinne
gap) (dB)
20–30
30–45
45–60
Rinne test: In this test, the tuning fork (after
being activated) is put on the mastoid process for
a given ear (it will assess the bone conduction
(BC)) and then 2cm lateral to the external auditory canal of that ear (it will assess the air conduction (AC)), and the patient is asked which
sound heard better.
• Normal hearing: It will give a positive Rinne,
which means AC is better than BC.
• CHL: It will give a negative Rinne, which
means BC is better than AC.
• SNHL: It will give a positive Rinne. Look at
Table 1.1, which gives an interpretation of
negative and positive Rinne tests’ results of
the different types of tuning forks.
For other tuning forks clinical tests, look at
Table1.2.
1.3.2 Audiometric Tests
1.3.2.1 Pure Tone Audiometry
The audiometer is a device used for hearing
assessment. It can measure the threshold for air
conduction and bone conduction. In AC, 250,
500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz are used,
while in BC, 8000Hz is not measured. Pure tone
average (PTA) is the average threshold of
AC.Table1.3 shows the different symbols used
in an audiogram.
Hearing assessment can show:
(a) Normal hearing: if all threshold within the
normal level.

1 General Audiology
Table 1.2 Other tuning forks clinical tests
Test How to perform the test Normal hearing CHL SNHL
Bing test The tuning fork is put on the
Schwabach
test
Absolute
bone
conduction
Note: In Gelle test, the tuning fork is put on the patient’s mastoid process, and then a different amount of pressure level
is applied to the tympanic membrane (TM). Patients with normal TM and ossicles will notice a decrease of sound while
the pressure is increased, while patients with ossicular discontinuity or xation will appreciate no change in sound. It
was used before to detect patients with otosclerosis
mastoid process of the ear,
and the examiner closes and
opens the patient’s ear canal
by his nger
The tuning fork is put on the
mastoid process of the
patient till the sound will
stop, then the examiner will
put that fork to his mastoid
process
The tuning fork is put on the
patient’s mastoid process and
then on the examiner’s
mastoid process. The
external auditory canal of the
patient and the examiner
should be occluded
Positive Bing, which
means the patient will
hear the sound louder
when the ear is occluded
Normal Schwabach; The
patient will stop hearing
the sound same as the
examiner (given that the
examiner has a normal
hearing)
Both the patient and the
examiner will hear the
sound for the same
period
Negative Bing; there
will be no change in
the appreciation of the
sound while the ear is
opened or closed
Prolonged
Schwabach; the
patient will hear the
sound for a more
extended period than
the examiner
Both the patient and
the examiner will hear
the sound for the
same period
Positive Bing
Diminished
Schwabach; the
patient will stop
hearing the sound
before the examiner
The patient will
hear the sound for a
shorter period
5
Table 1.3 Different symbols used in an audiogram
Interpretation Right ear Left ear
Unmasked AC X
Masked AC
Unmasked BC < >
Masked BC [ ]
No response
Soundfield S S
(b) CHL: if BC within normal threshold but AC
shows some hearing loss.
(c) SNHL: Both AC and BC show the same
degree of hearing loss.
(d) Mixed: Both AC and BC show a hearing loss,
but AC has more severe hearing loss than
BC.
• Low-frequency SNHL: found in endolym-
phatic hydrops.
• High-frequency SNHL: found in presbycusis
and ototoxicity.
• Carhart notch: found in otosclerosis.
• 4kHz Notch: found in noise-induced hearing
loss.
• Cookie Bit (U-shaped): found in hereditary
Look at Fig. 1.1 that represents a different
hearing loss.
type of audiograms.
Masking
Note
• Maximal CHL is 60 dB, and it is found in
cases of an intact TM with ossicular
discontinuity.
Interaural attenuation is the amount of sound
needed to make it cross to the contralateral ear
(non-tested ear); because of that, the tested
sound should not exceed that level to prevent
AL GRAWANY

6
Frequency in hertz (hz)
Hearing threshold level in descibels (db)
120
8000
Frequency in hertz (hz)
oo
ab
cd
M. A. AlShawabkeh et al.
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Hearing threshold level in descibels (dB)
100
110
120
[
o
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
[
]]
o
X
o
[
o
Frequency in hertz (Hz)
[
o
X
[
o
[
[
[
]]
o
o
XX X
o
[
[
]
o
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Hearing threshold level in descibels (db)
100
110
120
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Hearing threshold level in descibels (db)
100
110
[
o
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
[
oo
Frequency in hertz (hz)
[
[
]
]
o
[[
[
]
[
]
o
X
o
X
o
XX
o
X
[
[
[
]
[
]
o
X
o
X
Fig. 1.1 Different types of audiograms. (a) Normal hearing in the right ear, (b) mild SNHL in the right ear, (c) bilateral
CHL, (d) bilateral mixed hearing loss
crossover, otherwise masking is needed. In AC
testing, the interaural attenuation for stimuli
delivered via headphones ranges from 35 to
50 dB, and it is 60 to 65 dB for the stimuli
delivered via the earphones. In BC testing, it is
0dB [4].
To prevent crossover, masking should be used
ear is more than 70dB the BC in the non-tested
ear for the insert earphones. Masking also should
be used in the BC test if the AB gap in the tested
ear is more than 10dB.
While testing a dead ear, sound can cross to
the non-test ear giving a shadow curve.
For degree of hearing loss, look at Table1.4.
in the non-test ear. Masking is a narrow-band
noise for pure tone audiometry or wideband noise
for speech audiometry. Masking should be used
while doing AC test in cases where the AC in the
tested ear is more than 40dB the BC in the nontested ear for the headphones, or AC in the tested
1.3.2.2 Speech Audiometry
Here the stimulus is the spoken words; it can be
either Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) or
Word Recognition Score (WRS) (Speech
Discrimination Score):

1 General Audiology
7
Table 1.4 Degree of hearing loss
0–25dB HL Normal
26–40dB HL Mild
41–55dB HL Moderate
56–70dB HL Moderately severe
71–90dB HL Severe
Above 91 Profound
Table 1.5 The interpretation of WRS results
WRS (%) Interpretation
90–100 Normal
76–88 Slight difculty
60–74 Moderated difculty
40–58 Poor
40 Very poor
Note: In normal individuals, as the intensity of the sound
at which PB words are presented increases, the score will
increase until it reaches 100%. In SNHL of cochlear origin, it will reach a plateau at which the WRS score will not
increase. However, in SNHL of retrocochlear origin, as
sound’s intensity increases, WRS will not maintain that
plateau and then it will fall down; this condition is called
RollOver Phenomenon. Look at Fig.1.2
(a) SRT: the stimulus is spondee words (i.e.,
two-syllable words that have the same stress
on each syllable as in “eardrum”). The
threshold is the lowest intensity at which the
patient repeats the words in 50% of the time.
SRT should be within 10dB of the measured
PTA.
(b) WRS: the stimulus is phonetically balanced
(PB) words, which are presented to the
patient at 30–40 dB above SL. The patient
will hear 50 words. The result is the percentage of the words that the patient will repeat
correctly. The interpretation of the results is
shown in Table1.5.
1.3.2.3 Immittance/Impedance Test
objective one, and it can measure ear canal volume of the tested ear and the compliance of its
TM at different pressure levels, which will be
shown on a chart called tympanogram. A normal
test will show a type A graph; in adults, the peak
compliance will be 0.3–1.4 (mean 0.8), the peak
will be at average 0mm H
O pressure (between
2
−50mm H2O till +50mm H2O is considered nor-
mal), and ear canal volume is 0.6–1.5mL (mean
1.1). In pediatrics, the peak compliance will be
0.2–0.9 (mean 0.5), the peak will be at average
0mm H2O pressure (between −50mm H2O till
+150 mm H
O is considered normal), and ear
2
canal volume is 0.4–1.0 mL (mean 0.7). There
are ve types of tympanogram graphs:
1. Type A: is the normal one and discussed
above.
2. Type B: a at one, and it can indicate either:
(a) Fluid behind the TM: the volume of the
ear canal will be normal.
(b) TM perforation: the volume of the ear
canal will be high.
(c) A plugged probe by either poor tting or
wax: the volume of the ear canal will be
low.
3. Type C: the peak will be at negative pressure,
and this will indicate Eustachian tube
dysfunction.
4. Type As: The peak will be shallow, and this
can indicate wither:
(a) Otosclerosis.
(b) Tympanosclerosis.
(c) Malleus xation.
5. Type Ad: The peak will be high, and this indicates either:
(a) Flaccid TM.
(b) Ossicular discontinuity.
Tympanometry
This device is composed of a probe inserted in
the tested ear canal. It has three channels, the rst
will deliver a 226Hz tone, this tone will go to TM
and then either get reected or absorbed, the second channel will collect the reected sound, and
the last channel will make changes of the pressure inside the ear canal. A compliant TM will
reect less sound than a stiff TM.This test is an
Look at Fig.1.3 which shows different types
of tympanograms.
Acoustic Reex
In the case where there is an exposure to a highintensity sound, there will be a reective contraction of the bilateral stapedial muscle making the
TM stiffer; this is a protective mechanism of the
ear against high-intensity sounds. This reex is
AL GRAWANY
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
