Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4446_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
Contents
xv
27 Complications of Functional Endoscopic Sinus
Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
Shanmugam Ganesan, Emad Al Duhirat, Hamad Al Saey, Mansour Al Sulaiti, Maryam Abdulraheem, Raa Zahid, and Ahmed Shaikh
28 Neoplasms of the Sinonasal Cavity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
Andrew Tassler, Charles A. Riley, Chetan Sa, and Michael G. Stewart
29 Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327
Hamad Al Saey, Ahmed Shaikh, Sara Ashkanani, Mansour Al Sulaiti, Emad Al Duhirat, and Shanmugam Ganesan
30 Anterior and Midline Central Skull Base Tumors . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
Sara Ashkanani and Abhishek Menon
31 Epistaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
Ahmed Shaikh, Hamad Al Saey, Sara Ashkanani, Mashael Alhail, Mansour Al Sulaiti, Maryam Abdulraheem, Emad Al Duhirat, and Shanmugam Ganesan
32 The Nasal Septum and Turbinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355
Mansour Al Sulaiti, Emad Al Duhirat, Hamad Al Saey, Shanmugam Ganesan, and Abdulaziz Al Jufairi
33 Pitfalls and Pearls in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
Omar M. Bargas and Ahmad AbuAlsoud
Part IV Head and Neck
34 Thyroid and Parathyroid Glands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
Hassan Haidar, Abdelrahman Alsaleh, Waheed Rahman, and Hussein Enezi
35 Diseases of the Salivary Glands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
Hassan Haidar, Abhishek Menon, and Emad Al Duhirat
36 An Approach to Neck Masses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397
Suzan Saeed Mohamed, Abhishek Menon, and Waheed Rahman
37 Principles of Management of Head and Neck Cancers . . . . . . . . 409
Anil K. D’Cruz, Richa Vaish, and Harsh Dhar
38 Neoplasms of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427
Anil K. D’Cruz, Harsh Dhar, Khuzema Fatehi, and Richa Vaish
39 Neoplasms of the Larynx and Laryngopharynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
Ismail Zohdi, Louay ElSharkawy, and Mahmoud ElBestar
xvi
40 Cancer of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses . . . . . . . . . . . 465
Ahmed Eldaly, Mohammed Hassab, and Ali Al Ansari
41 Nasopharyngeal Cancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
Aisha Larem, Emad Al Duhirat, and Hassan Omer
42 Difficult Airway Management forENT Surgery
forNon-anesthesiologists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
Nabil A. Shallik, Odai Khamash, and Mohammad Al Nobani
Part V Laryngology and Esophagology
43 Physiology of the Voice and Clinical Voice Assessment . . . . . . . . 515
Mayed Radi Alkhafaji and Dina Emam
44 Inflammatory, Infectious, and Acquired Conditions
of the Larynx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 521
Aisha Larem, Nal Arimbrathodi, and Raa Zahid
45 Benign Lesions of the Vocal Folds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531
Mayed Radi
46 Vocal Cord Paralysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539
Rashid Al-Abri and Suresh Pillai
Contents
47 Dysphagia Disorders Evaluation and Management . . . . . . . . . . 547
Mayed Radi Alkhafaji and Olfa Almannai
48 Esophageal Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
Aisha Larem, Ma’in Ali Al Shawabkeh, and Khalil Sultan
Part VI General Otolaryngology
49 Pharyngitis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 567
Abdulsalam Al-Qahtani and Zaid Altamimi
50 Deep Neck Space Infections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575
Aisha Larem and Adham Aljariri
51 Obstructive Sleep Apnea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 585
Medhat Shams and Hayam AlTaweel
52 ENT Pharmacotherapy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 593
Aisha Larem, Adham Aljariri, Mouna Ghannam, Ahmed Aly, Shaban Mohammed, and Sara Shabana
53 Neck Trauma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605
Furat Abbas and Hossam Makki
54 ENT Manifestations in Systemic and Inflammatory
Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 615
Aya Elderee, Ali Al Ansari, Hassan Haidar, and Mazin Al Khabouri
AL GRAWANY
Contents
xvii
Part VII Pediatrics
55 Anesthetic Considerations forPediatric ENT Surgeries
forNon-anesthesiologists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 627
Nabil A. Shallik, Ahmed Zaghw, Al Moataz Adham, and Sahar Mahadik
56 Adenoid and Tonsils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 647
Amr A. Elhakeem
57 Branchial Arch: Anatomy and Anomalies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 655
Faisal Abdulkader, Francis J. Lannigan, and Mahmoud Taha
58 Evaluation of Pediatric Head and Neck Masses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663
Faisal Abdulkader and Niveen Eltigani Elmusharaf Mukhtar
59 Pediatric Head and Neck Vascular Anomalies and Tumors . . . . 671
Faisal Abdulkader and Niveen Eltigani Elmusharaf Mukhtar
60 Evaluation of Stridor and Wheezy Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681
Amr A. Elhakeem
61 Managing the Stridulous Child . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 689
Mai Elhassan
62 Congenital and Acquired Disorders of the Larynx . . . . . . . . . . . 695
Aisha Larem, Faisal Abdulkader, Zaid Altamimi, and Amr A. Elhakeem
63 ENT-Related Syndromes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 707
Faisal Abdulkader and Mai Ahmed Mohamed Elhassan Ahmed
64 Congenital Anomalies of the Nose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 719
Faisal Abdulkader, Francis J. Lannigan, and Mahmoud Taha
65 Cleft Lip and Palate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 729
Dina Emam, Aya Elderee, and Abdelrahman Alsaleh
66 Pediatric Audiology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 737
Abdulsalam Al-Qahtani, Reni K. Chandran, Khaled Abdulhadi, and Zaid Altamimi
Part VIII Facial Plastics
67 Facial Aesthetic Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749
Rani Hammoud and Hassan Haidar
68 Rhinoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 759
Hassan Haidar and Rani Hammoud
69 Otoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 769
Rani Hammoud and Hassan Haidar
xviii
70 Blepharoplasty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 777
Maryam Abdulraheem, Rani Hammoud, Shanmugam Ganesan, and Alwyn D’Souza
71 Facelifting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783
Rani Hammoud and Hassan Haidar
72 Fillers and Neurotoxins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 791
Maryam Abdulraheem, Rani Hammoud, Shanmugam Ganesan, and Alwyn D’Souza
Contents
AL GRAWANY
Part I
Audiology
General Audiology
Ma’inAliAl Shawabkeh, HassanHaidar, andKhaledAbdulhadi
1
1.1 Introduction
Audiological tests are essential in clinical prac­tice as they can guide the management and deter­mine the treatment option for patients. These tests should always be taken as a battery of tests and not relying on a single test, as this will help to give a whole picture of the patient.
1.2 Denitions
Sound: It is the energy that travels in waves within a medium (like air). A sound wave is composed of compression (more dense) and rarefaction (less dense) waves. Two important terms related to sound are intensity and frequency.
Frequency: It is the number of waves per sec- ond. Hertz (Hz) is the unit used for measure­ment of frequency. It is related to the pitch of the sound. The higher the frequency is, the more pitch the sound will be. Sound in nature is complex, which means it is composed of
M. A. Al Shawabkeh · K. Abdelhadi ENT Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar e-mail: Khadi@hmc.org.qa
H. Haidar (*) ENT Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
more than one frequency. Pure tone sound, that is, sound composed from single fre­quency, is rarely found in nature but usually used in audiometer for hearing assessment. Humans are capable of hearing sounds between 20 and 20,000Hz [1].
Noise: It is a complex aperiodic sound; it can be a white noise if it composed of all the fre­quencies, a narrow-band noise if it is com­posed of certain frequencies (above and below specic frequency), or speech noise if it is composed of speech frequencies (i.e., 300–3000Hz).
Intensity: It is the strength of the sound and consists of the amount of energy produced in an area per time. It correlates to the loudness of the sound. Decibel is the unit used to measure the intensity or loudness of sounds. The normal conversation usually is about 60dB, and the quiet countryside is about 30dB.One hundred and ten decibel can cause discomfort in the ear, and 130dB can cause pain in the ears [2].
Decibel: It is a relative measure of the inten­sity of sound. It represents a logarithmic expression of two intensities ratios.
Sound pressure level (SPL): It is related to the intensity of the sound and considered an abso­lute pressure reference level for the decibel. Zero dB SPL=0.0002dyn/cm
Hearing level (HL): It is the most common reference used in audiometers. Zero dB HL means that normal human ears will perceive
2
.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 A. Al-Qahtani et al. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Otolaryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_1
AL GRAWANY
3
4
M. A. AlShawabkeh et al.
the sound at any given frequency in 50% of the times.
Sensation level (SL): Here, the reference is the threshold for an individual. Zero SL means that an individual can hear the sound at a given frequency in 50% of the times.
Recruitment: It is the abnormal growth of loudness. It indicates a cochlear hearing loss. Patients with this condition are poor candi­dates for hearing aid.
Most comfortable level: It is the intensity of the sound that is more comfortable to the patient.
Loudness discomfort level: It is the intensity of the sound that will produce discomfort to the patient.
Dynamic range: It is the range between the loudness discomfort level and the most com­fortable level. Patients with recruitment will have a reduced dynamic range.
1.3 Assessment ofHearing
1.3.1 Clinical Tests
1.3.1.1 Tuning Fork Tests
There are different forks with each having specic frequencies. There are 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, and 4096Hz. Five hundred twelveHertz tuning fork is the most suitable one used for hearing assessment, because the one with low frequency will give a bone vibration sensation that means it is felt rather than heard, while the one with high frequencies will give a short decay time [3].
Weber test: It is the test of lateralization; the
tuning fork is put on the middle of the forehead after being activated, and then assess where the patient will hear the sound better.
• Normal hearing: there will be no lateralization of the sound (in the center).
• Unilateral Conductive hearing loss (CHL): he will lateralize the sound to the diseased ear.
• Unilateral Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL): the patient lateralizes the sound to the normal ear.
Table 1.1 Interpretation of negative and positive Rinne
tests’ results of the different types of tuning forks
Degree of air-bone gap (AB
256Hz 512Hz 1024Hz Negative
Rinne Negative Rinne Negative Rinne
Positive Rinne Negative Rinne Negative Rinne
Positive Rinne Positive Rinne Negative Rinne
gap) (dB) 20–30
30–45
45–60
Rinne test: In this test, the tuning fork (after being activated) is put on the mastoid process for a given ear (it will assess the bone conduction (BC)) and then 2cm lateral to the external audi­tory canal of that ear (it will assess the air con­duction (AC)), and the patient is asked which sound heard better.
• Normal hearing: It will give a positive Rinne,
which means AC is better than BC.
• CHL: It will give a negative Rinne, which
means BC is better than AC.
• SNHL: It will give a positive Rinne. Look at
Table 1.1, which gives an interpretation of
negative and positive Rinne tests’ results of
the different types of tuning forks.
For other tuning forks clinical tests, look at Table1.2.
1.3.2 Audiometric Tests
1.3.2.1 Pure Tone Audiometry
The audiometer is a device used for hearing assessment. It can measure the threshold for air conduction and bone conduction. In AC, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz are used, while in BC, 8000Hz is not measured. Pure tone average (PTA) is the average threshold of AC.Table1.3 shows the different symbols used in an audiogram.
Hearing assessment can show:
(a) Normal hearing: if all threshold within the
normal level.
1 General Audiology
Table 1.2 Other tuning forks clinical tests
Test How to perform the test Normal hearing CHL SNHL Bing test The tuning fork is put on the
Schwabach test
Absolute bone conduction
Note: In Gelle test, the tuning fork is put on the patient’s mastoid process, and then a different amount of pressure level is applied to the tympanic membrane (TM). Patients with normal TM and ossicles will notice a decrease of sound while the pressure is increased, while patients with ossicular discontinuity or xation will appreciate no change in sound. It was used before to detect patients with otosclerosis
mastoid process of the ear, and the examiner closes and opens the patient’s ear canal by his nger The tuning fork is put on the mastoid process of the patient till the sound will stop, then the examiner will put that fork to his mastoid process The tuning fork is put on the patient’s mastoid process and then on the examiner’s mastoid process. The external auditory canal of the patient and the examiner should be occluded
Positive Bing, which means the patient will hear the sound louder when the ear is occluded
Normal Schwabach; The patient will stop hearing the sound same as the examiner (given that the examiner has a normal hearing) Both the patient and the examiner will hear the sound for the same period
Negative Bing; there will be no change in the appreciation of the sound while the ear is opened or closed Prolonged Schwabach; the patient will hear the sound for a more extended period than the examiner Both the patient and the examiner will hear the sound for the same period
Positive Bing
Diminished Schwabach; the patient will stop hearing the sound before the examiner
The patient will hear the sound for a shorter period
5
Table 1.3 Different symbols used in an audiogram
Interpretation Right ear Left ear
Unmasked AC X
Masked AC
Unmasked BC < >
Masked BC [ ]
No response
Soundfield S S
(b) CHL: if BC within normal threshold but AC
shows some hearing loss.
(c) SNHL: Both AC and BC show the same
degree of hearing loss.
(d) Mixed: Both AC and BC show a hearing loss,
but AC has more severe hearing loss than BC.
• Low-frequency SNHL: found in endolym-
phatic hydrops.
• High-frequency SNHL: found in presbycusis
and ototoxicity.
• Carhart notch: found in otosclerosis.
• 4kHz Notch: found in noise-induced hearing
loss.
• Cookie Bit (U-shaped): found in hereditary
Look at Fig. 1.1 that represents a different
hearing loss.
type of audiograms.
Masking
Note
• Maximal CHL is 60 dB, and it is found in cases of an intact TM with ossicular discontinuity.
Interaural attenuation is the amount of sound needed to make it cross to the contralateral ear (non-tested ear); because of that, the tested sound should not exceed that level to prevent
AL GRAWANY
6
Frequency in hertz (hz)
Hearing threshold level in descibels (db)
120
8000
Frequency in hertz (hz)
oo
ab
cd
M. A. AlShawabkeh et al.
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Hearing threshold level in descibels (dB)
100
110
120
[
o
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
[
]]
o
X
o
[
o
Frequency in hertz (Hz)
[
o
X
[
o
[
[
[
]]
o
o
XX X
o
[
[
]
o
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Hearing threshold level in descibels (db)
100
110
120
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Hearing threshold level in descibels (db)
100
110
[
o
125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
[
oo
Frequency in hertz (hz)
[
[
]
]
o
[[
[
]
[
]
o
X
o
X
o
XX
o
X
[
[
[
]
[
]
o
X
o
X
Fig. 1.1 Different types of audiograms. (a) Normal hearing in the right ear, (b) mild SNHL in the right ear, (c) bilateral
CHL, (d) bilateral mixed hearing loss
crossover, otherwise masking is needed. In AC testing, the interaural attenuation for stimuli delivered via headphones ranges from 35 to 50 dB, and it is 60 to 65 dB for the stimuli delivered via the earphones. In BC testing, it is 0dB [4].
To prevent crossover, masking should be used
ear is more than 70dB the BC in the non-tested ear for the insert earphones. Masking also should be used in the BC test if the AB gap in the tested ear is more than 10dB.
While testing a dead ear, sound can cross to
the non-test ear giving a shadow curve.
For degree of hearing loss, look at Table1.4. in the non-test ear. Masking is a narrow-band noise for pure tone audiometry or wideband noise for speech audiometry. Masking should be used while doing AC test in cases where the AC in the tested ear is more than 40dB the BC in the non­tested ear for the headphones, or AC in the tested
1.3.2.2 Speech Audiometry
Here the stimulus is the spoken words; it can be either Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) or Word Recognition Score (WRS) (Speech Discrimination Score):
1 General Audiology
7
Table 1.4 Degree of hearing loss
0–25dB HL Normal 26–40dB HL Mild 41–55dB HL Moderate 56–70dB HL Moderately severe 71–90dB HL Severe Above 91 Profound
Table 1.5 The interpretation of WRS results
WRS (%) Interpretation 90–100 Normal 76–88 Slight difculty 60–74 Moderated difculty 40–58 Poor 40 Very poor
Note: In normal individuals, as the intensity of the sound at which PB words are presented increases, the score will increase until it reaches 100%. In SNHL of cochlear ori­gin, it will reach a plateau at which the WRS score will not increase. However, in SNHL of retrocochlear origin, as sound’s intensity increases, WRS will not maintain that plateau and then it will fall down; this condition is called RollOver Phenomenon. Look at Fig.1.2
(a) SRT: the stimulus is spondee words (i.e.,
two-syllable words that have the same stress on each syllable as in “eardrum”). The threshold is the lowest intensity at which the patient repeats the words in 50% of the time. SRT should be within 10dB of the measured PTA.
(b) WRS: the stimulus is phonetically balanced
(PB) words, which are presented to the patient at 30–40 dB above SL. The patient will hear 50 words. The result is the percent­age of the words that the patient will repeat correctly. The interpretation of the results is shown in Table1.5.
1.3.2.3 Immittance/Impedance Test
objective one, and it can measure ear canal vol­ume of the tested ear and the compliance of its TM at different pressure levels, which will be shown on a chart called tympanogram. A normal test will show a type A graph; in adults, the peak compliance will be 0.3–1.4 (mean 0.8), the peak will be at average 0mm H
O pressure (between
2
50mm H2O till +50mm H2O is considered nor- mal), and ear canal volume is 0.6–1.5mL (mean
1.1). In pediatrics, the peak compliance will be
0.2–0.9 (mean 0.5), the peak will be at average 0mm H2O pressure (between 50mm H2O till +150 mm H
O is considered normal), and ear
2
canal volume is 0.4–1.0 mL (mean 0.7). There are ve types of tympanogram graphs:
1. Type A: is the normal one and discussed above.
2. Type B: a at one, and it can indicate either: (a) Fluid behind the TM: the volume of the
ear canal will be normal.
(b) TM perforation: the volume of the ear
canal will be high.
(c) A plugged probe by either poor tting or
wax: the volume of the ear canal will be low.
3. Type C: the peak will be at negative pressure, and this will indicate Eustachian tube dysfunction.
4. Type As: The peak will be shallow, and this can indicate wither: (a) Otosclerosis. (b) Tympanosclerosis. (c) Malleus xation.
5. Type Ad: The peak will be high, and this indi­cates either: (a) Flaccid TM. (b) Ossicular discontinuity.
Tympanometry
This device is composed of a probe inserted in the tested ear canal. It has three channels, the rst will deliver a 226Hz tone, this tone will go to TM and then either get reected or absorbed, the sec­ond channel will collect the reected sound, and the last channel will make changes of the pres­sure inside the ear canal. A compliant TM will reect less sound than a stiff TM.This test is an
Look at Fig.1.3 which shows different types
of tympanograms.
Acoustic Reex
In the case where there is an exposure to a high­intensity sound, there will be a reective contrac­tion of the bilateral stapedial muscle making the TM stiffer; this is a protective mechanism of the ear against high-intensity sounds. This reex is
AL GRAWANY