Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4446_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
112
A. Larem et al.
• Normal examination of the external ear canal
and tympanic membrane.
• Weber and Rinne’s tests show a positive
Rinne’s test (air conduction (AC)>bone con-
duction (BC)). Weber’s lateralized to the bet-
ter ear.
• Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) normal air-bone
gap with decreased bone conduction.
Identifying the severity of the hearing loss is essential to determine the appropriate interven­tion. Hearing losses between 26 and 40dB HL are considered mild, 41 and 55dB HL moder­ate, 56 and 70dB HL moderately severe, 71 and 90dB HL severe, and >91dB HL profound [1].
10.2 Etiology ofSensorineural
Hearing Loss
Etiologies of SNHL can be divided as a congeni­tal (hereditary, non-hereditary, and idiopathic) or acquired. Figure10.1 summarizes the most com­mon causes.
10.2.1 Congenital
Congenital etiologies are divided into hereditary, non-hereditary, and idiopathic.
• Hereditary (50%)
Non-syndromic (70%): more common,
autosomal recessive (AR) in (75–80%), autosomal dominant (AD) in (20–25%), X-linked in (2–4%), and Mitochondrial in <1%. GJ2B mutation (autosomal reces­sive) coding for the protein gap junction beta 2 (also called connexin 26); results in impaired Potassium (K+) exchange.
Syndromic (30%): Divided to AR, AD,
and X-linked. Most common include Usher and Pendred syndromes (both autosomal recessive). Most common AD syndrome is Waardenburg syndrome. X-linked includes Alport syndrome. Syndromes’ features include [2]
Waardenburg’s syndrome White forelock, heterochromia of iris. Usher syndrome Retinitis pigmentosa.
Sensorineural
hearing loss
Acquired
(75%)
Meningitis Ototoxicity Trauma Nose induced
hearing loss
Mumps/measles Recurrent otitis/mastoiditis Unknown
Non-syndromic (70%) AR (75%-80%) AD (20%-25%)X linked (2%-4%)Mitochondrial <1%
Fig. 10.1 Etiologies of sensorineural hearing loss
Hereditary
(50%)
AD syndromesWaardenburgTreacher-CollinsSticklerGoldenhar
Syndromic
(30%)
AR syndromesUsherJervell and lang-onPendred
Congenital
(25%)
X-Linked
syndromes
Alport
Non-
hereditary
(25%)
TORCH Teratogenic
drugs Neonatal sepsis
Prematurity Low birth weight
Idiopathic
(25%)
10 Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL)
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
113
Alport’s syndrome Nephritis. Pendred syndrome Thyroid goiter. Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome Prolonged Q-T intervals and enlarged T waves.
• Non-hereditary (25%)
Malformations can be membranous
(Alexander’s Aplasia, Scheibe Deformity, Siebenmann–Bing Dysplasia) or Osseous and Membranous (Cochlear Hypoplasia, Mondini, Common Cavity, Cochlear Aplasia, Michel Aplasia, Small Internal Auditory Canal). Mondini malformation is the most common type of cochlear malformation.
TORCH Infections: It includes
Toxoplasmosis, Other (syphilis, varicella­zoster, parvovirus B19), Rubella, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Herpes.
– Cytomegalovirus is the most common
cause of congenital viral deafness [3].
– Mumps is the most common infectious
cause of acquired sensorineural hearing loss.
– Other perinatal factors include prematurity,
low birth weight, teratogenic drugs, mater­nal diabetes, hyperbilirubinemia, and neo­natal sepsis.
• Idiopathic (25%)
10.2.2 Acquired
The most common causes of acquired sensori­neural hearing loss are the following:
1. Presbycusis.
2. Noise-induced hearing loss.
3. Post-meningitis.
4. Cerebrovascular accident.
5. Ototoxic medication exposure.
6. Autoimmune inner ear disease (Coganʼs
syndrome, relapsing polychondritis, Wegenerʼs granulomatosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogrenʼs syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis).
7. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
8. Vestibular schwannoma or meningioma.
9. Erosive inner ear disease (cholesteatoma or
chronic otitis media).
10. Trauma to inner ear.
11. Endolymphatic hydrops.
10.2.2.1 Presbycusis
It is an age-related sensorineural hearing impair­ment. It results from a combination of environ­mental and genetic factors. Males are affected more often than females. Its features include slow and insidious onset, lack of clarity than a loss of volume, and tinnitus as often the present­ing symptoms [4].
• Four types of presbycusis have been identi­ed [5].
1. Sensory presbycusis, characterized by
symmetric high frequency hearing loss with a decrease of speech discrimination. The loss affects both hair cells and sup­porting cells in the basal turn of the cochlea. Figure 10.2 demonstrates pure­tone audiometry with features of Presbycusis in both ears.
2. Neural presbycusis, characterized by a
signicant loss of speech discrimination. Loss of whole cochlear neurons.
3. Strial presbycusis, characterized by at
pure-tone audiogram with excellent speech discrimination. Associated with atrophy of the stria vascularis in the middle and apical turn of the cochlea.
4. Conductive presbycusis (cochlear con- ductive), changes affect the basilar membrane.
Management
Hearing aids or cochlear implants are an excel­lent option for those who have severe to profound hearing loss with discrimination scores below 40% in both ears [4].
10.2.2.2 Ototoxicity
Ototoxicity can be induced by any route of drug administration (topical, drops, sprays, inhalation, or systemic). Symptoms of ototoxicity include hearing loss (primarily high frequency), tinnitus,
AL GRAWANY
114
Fig. 10.2 Pure-tone audiometry showing features of Presbycusis in both ears
A. Larem et al.
and balance impairment. The most commonly used drugs causing ototoxicity are the aminogly­cosides and platinum-containing chemotherapy agents [4]. Hearing loss may be unilateral or asymmetric and can progress during or after ces­sation of therapy. Ototoxic drugs inducing low­frequency hearing loss include arsenic and erythromycin. Ototoxic drugs’ effects can be per­manent (aminoglycoside, cisplatin, carboplatin, or vancomycin) or temporary (salicylates, eryth­romycin, or quinine). The most common ototoxic drugs are described as follow:
Aminoglycosides
It can be mainly vestibulotoxic (Streptomycin or Gentamycin) damaging type 1 hair cells of crista ampullaris [6], or mainly cochleotoxic (Neomycin, Kanamycin, or Amikacin) damaging outer hair cells, or ves­tibulo-cochleo toxic (Tobramycin). The toxic­ity starts at the basal coil of cochlea (high frequency) and progressing up to the apex. Mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene mutation increases susceptibility to aminoglycosides ototoxicity [7]. Ototoxicity may continue even after the stopping of aminoglycoside [4]. Risk factors include dose, duration, liver and kid­ney disease, bacteremia, concomitant use of other agents, and genetic predisposition.
Anti-neoplastic (chemotherapy)
It includes cisplatin and carboplatin. It is highly ototoxic. Cisplatin affects mainly outer
hair cells, while carboplatin affects mainly inner hair cells [7]. The main cochlear damage occurs in the basic turn within the outer hair cells. Figures 10.3 and 10.4 show pure-tone audiometry showing and otoacoustic emission ndings of bilateral platinum chemotherapy ototoxicity.
Loop Diuretics
It includes frusemide, ethacrynic acid, and bumetanide. It causes reversible or permanent bilateral hearing loss. Mechanism of toxicity occur by affecting stria vascularis which lead to reductions of endocochlear potential [4].
Salicylates (Aspirin)
It presents tinnitus more than a loss of hear­ing. It causes reversible hearing loss.
Others
It includes industrial chemicals, Vancomycin, Macrolides, and Quinine.
Ototoxicity can be limited and prevented by
antioxidants such as N-acetyl-cysteine and sodium thiosulfate [8]. It is treated by the cessa­tion of treatment and substitution by a different agent if possible, and hearing rehabilitation can be achieved with applying hearing aid.
10.2.2.3 Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
It can be temporary or permanent hearing loss. Temporary threshold shift (TTS) presents with a brief period of hearing loss after noise exposure, and it is reversible. Permanent threshold shift
30
dB SPL
30
8.0
Frequency (kHz)
10 Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL)
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 10.3 Pure-tone audiometry showing nding of bilateral platinum chemotherapy ototoxicity
115
25 20 15 10
5 0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 5.5 7.0
0.75 1.5 2.5 3.2 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0
25 20 15 10
5
-5 0
dB SPL
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.5 4.5 5.5 7.0
0.75 1.5 2.5 3.2 4.0
Fig. 10.4 Otoacoustic emission in left and right ears with platinum ototoxicity
(PTS) hearing loss does not return to the previous hearing level [4]. The natural resonance of exter­nal auditory canal is from 3 to 5kHz which may be the reason for a “noise notch” at 4 kHz.
louder than 85dB for an 8-h period, with each 5-dB increase that must cut exposure into half. Hearing rehabilitation can be achieved by apply-
ing hearing aid. Figure10.5 demonstrates a pure-tone audiometry of patient with noise-induced hearing loss. Acoustic trauma can occur from exposure to intense trauma and lead to immediate hearing loss. The hypothesis of metabolic changes leads to TTS, while the hypothesis of structural changes leads to PTS [9].
10.2.2.4 Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
It is dened as a unilateral hearing loss of at least 30 dB in at least three contiguous frequencies occurring within 3days. It can be bilateral in 2%. It is of unknown etiology, possible underlying viral or vascular (ischemic) etiology [10]. Pure-
Management
Workplace restriction and prevention is better than cure, and measures must be taken for work environments that expose patients to sounds
tone audiometry and MRI should be considered to rule out vestibular schwannoma or other intra­cranial causes such as multiple sclerosis and small vessel ischemic changes. The prevalence of
Frequency (kHz)
5.0
6.0
AL GRAWANY
116
Fig. 10.5 Pure-tone audiometry of patient with noise induced hearing loss
A. Larem et al.
acoustic neuroma among patients with sudden SNHL is less clear, although estimates range from 0.8% [11].
Management
Most recent clinical practice guidelines recom­mend oral or intratympanic steroids as the rst­line treatment, and oral prednisone typically is given at 1mg/kg/day (up to 60mg) for 7–14days and then taper dose over the similar period of time. Intratympanic steroid injection can be used as an initial or salvage treatment [12].
As an adjunct to oral steroids, hyperbaric oxy­gen and antivirals may be offered. Prognosis is worse with a greater degree of hearing loss, ver­tigo, advanced age, poorly controlled diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia [10].
10.2.2.5 Auditory Neuropathy/
Dys-Synchrony
It is dened as an abnormal/absent neural trans­mission in the auditory but evidence of normal outer hair cells function (cochlear microphonic and otoacoustic emissions normal), thought to be caused by abnormal central auditory temporal processing in response to a stimulus. Typically seen in young children, it is mostly related to a genetic cause and has a frequent association with other developmental delays. It may have rela­tively good pure-tone thresholds but poor speech understanding and auditory development. It
exhibits variable response to amplication and/or cochlear implants [13].
10.2.2.6 Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease (AIED)
It is characterized by a subacute progressive uc­tuating bilateral sensorineural hearing loss that responds to steroids. One ear is frequently involved initially and worsens before the devel­opment of hearing loss in the contralateral side. Patients often describe aural fullness as well as tinnitus [4].
The diagnostic criteria include bilateral senso­rineural hearing loss >30 dB at any frequency and progression in at least one ear on two serial audiograms <3months apart [14]. The hallmark of the disease is the responsiveness of the hearing loss to steroids or cytotoxic drugs [4].
Cogan syndrome is a rare disease of young adults, characterized by triad of autoimmune ker­atitis, vertigo, and SNHL [4]. Around 15% of cases are associated with other systemic autoim­mune diseases including multiple sclerosis, rheu­matoid arthritis, and inammatory bowel disease.
Investigations that help to diagnose AIED include an audiogram and MRI of the internal auditory canal if asymmetric hearing is present. Lab work including anti-HSP-70 (= 68-kDa anti­gen) can be considered, but it has limited sensi­tivity and specicity. If other autoimmune
10 Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL)
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
117
diseases are suspected with presence of ndings such as arthritis, ocular disease, skin lesions, and kidney disease, a further rheumatological investi­gation might be required.
Management
It includes a trial of prednisone 60mg daily for 4–6weeks, with a close audiological follow-up by repeating PTA frequently. If the patient responds to steroid, then continue until a plateau is reached in the hearing gain, and then a mainte­nance dose for steroid should be continued for at least 6months. Regarding non-steroid respond­ers, taper immediately. Methotrexate is used for patients who cannot tolerate steroids or in cases where weaning steroids cause a decline in hear­ing [15]. Cyclophosphamide and etanercept are considered as a second line. In case profound bilateral SNHL is developed, cochlear implanta­tion is an excellent modality for the restoration of auditory function for this type of pathology.
10.3 Hearing Aids andAuditory Rehabilitation
Hearing aids provide a major role in auditory rehabilitation, where it amplies the sound to make speech more audible without being uncom­fortable. It is mainly indicated for patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and it also has a role in the management of conductive hear­ing loss (CHL), particularly for patients who are
not amenable to surgical intervention. Multiple options are available depending on the patient factors, type of hearing loss, unilateral or bilat­eral, cosmetic appearance, batteries type, and electronic issues. Hearing aids can be either con­ventional or implantable.
Hearing aid is composed of a microphone, amplier, receiver, battery, and volume control (see Fig.
10.6).
Hearing aids can be conventional or implant­able. The conventional type is more affordable and less invasive but has limitations when it is compared with implantable hearing devices which include insufcient amplication, acoustic feedback, non-linear sound distortion, occlusion effects, poor auditory transduction, and cos­moses. The implantable hearing aids include osseointegrated bone-conducting hearing pros­theses and middle ear implants.
1. Conventional Hearing Aid:
It can be categorized to analogue, ana­logue/digital hybrid, and digital hearing aids. Analogue hearing aid is less common as it has less exibility than the digital one. The ana­logue/digital hybrid hearing aids are charac­terized by digital memory and the ability to control the analogue circuit digitally which makes it more exible in adjusting gain and acoustic output. The digital hearing aids are computer- controlled devices, via Digital sig­nal processing (DSP) chip, and they have the highest exibility with improved speech rec-
Fig. 10.6 Hearing aid
components and function. EAC external auditory canal
Input acoustic
signal
Acoustic to mechanical
Microphone Amplifier
Mechanical to
electrical
Output acoustic
signal to EAC
AL GRAWANY
Boost the
electrical
signal
Electrical to
acoustic
Receiver
118
A. Larem et al.
Table 10.1 Advantages and disadvantages of hearing
aids by type
Type of hearing aid Advantages Disadvantages
Body Hearing Aids
Behind the Ear (BTE)
In the Ear (ITE)
In the Canal (ITC)
Completely in the Canal (CIC)
Low feedback with high level output, easy to manage.
It can be used for severe and profound hearing loss, large case ts larger batteries allows for more amplication and battery life. For moderate-to­severe hearing loss, better cosmetically appealing, superior ability to amplify on high-frequency sounds. More cosmetically appealing and allows for normal acoustics provided by the pinna, superior ability to amplify on high-frequency sounds, helps localization of sound Most cosmetically appealing, maximizes pinna and concha effects greater high­frequency gain.
Noticeable, poor sound localization, clothes, and body may rub against the microphone. Cosmesis, inadequate induces feedback, cannot be used with auricular anomalies.
Limited gain, feedback problems.
Gain sufcient for no more than moderate hearing loss, requires dexterity to insert, small size limits output/response controls, venting options limited.
Requires certain tting criteria, only for moderate hearing loss, small size limits output/ response controls, venting options limited, venting options very limited
ognition, sound quality, and comfort via dif­ferent mechanism, that is, digital noise reduction, digital feedback, and control spec­tral enhancement. Different types of conven­tional hearing aid are available which are described in Table10.1.
Bineural Versus mononeural hearing aid: the general rule is that binaural amplication is the arrangement of choice, unless signi-
cant contraindication is present. The main advantages of binaural amplication include better sound localization, speech discrimina­tion, intelligibility in noise, and release from masking, and it also eliminates head shadow effects which reduce high-frequency cues [16]. In addition, patients with binaural hear­ing loss can have temporary and perhaps a permanent decrease in the auditory function in the unaided ear which can be minimized by tting a bilateral hearing aid.
Contralateral routing of signal (CROS): it is used in case of single-sided deafness with normal hearing in the other ear. Microphone is tted on the impaired side and transmitted to a good ear. Bilateral CROS hearing aids also amplify sound to the better hearing ear.
2. Implantable Hearing Aid:
Numerous implantable devices are options for hearing rehabilitation in patients with conductive hearing loss who cannot use a conventional hear­ing aid.
(a) Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA):
They are indicated in cases of chronic oti­tis media patients with chronically dis­charging ears, or the presence of a large mastoid bowl or meatoplasty, and they are also indicated in case of congenital anom­alies (external ear deformity, aural atresia, and canal stenosis) as well as for single­sided deafness [17].
Contraindications: Age<5years, emo­tional instability, drug abuse, development delay, average bone conduction threshold (500, 1000, and 3000Hz) of the indicated ear worse than 45 dB HL, and if maxi­mum speech discrimination of the indi­cated ear below 60% [17].
(b) Middle-ear Implants (MEIs): There are
two basic types of transducers used in middle ear implantable hearing aids: piezoelectric and electromagnetic. They are used in cases of bilateral moderate-to­severe sensorineural. Its advantages include the elimination of feedback and occlusion effects [18].
10 Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL)
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Take-Home Messages
• Most common prenatal cause of hearing loss is intrauterine infection (CMV).
• Common causes of perinatal hearing loss are hypoxia, hyperbilirubinemia, infection, and medication toxicity.
• The most common postnatal cause of hearing loss is meningitis.
• Fluctuating hearing loss is seen in peri­lymphatic stula, Meniere disease, syphilis, autoimmune induced, sarcoid­osis, multiple sclerosis, and migraine­associated hearing loss.
3. Cochlear implant.
Acknowledgment Authors of the chapter would like to appreciate the help of Dr. Rani Salim Hammoud, an ENT resident in Hamad medical corporation, for his help and effort in editing the chapter.
References
1. Baiduc RR, Poling GL, Hong O, Dhar S. Clinical measures of auditory function: the cochlea and beyond. Dis Mon. 2013;59(4):147–56. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.disamonth.2013.01.005.
2. Toriello HV, Reardon W, Gorlin RJ.Hereditary hear­ing loss and its syndromes. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2004.
3. Fowler KB, Boppana SB.Congenital cytomegalovi­rus (CMV) infection and hearing decit. J Clin Virol. 2006;35:226.
4. Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V, etal. Sensorineural hearing loss in adults, Chap 150. In: Cummings otolaryngology: head & neck surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015. p.2319–35.
5. Schuknecht HF. Pathology of the ear. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993.
119
6. Rybak LP, Ramkumar V. Ototoxicity. Kidney Int. 2007;72:931.
7. Schacht J, Talaska AE, Rybak LP.Cisplatin and ami­noglycoside antibiotics: hearing loss and its preven­tion. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012;295(11):1837–50.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22578.
8. Sheth S, Mukherjea D, Rybak LP, Ramkumar V. Mechanisms of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and otoprotection. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:338.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00338.
9. Lim DJ.Effects of noise and ototoxic drugs at the cel­lular level in the cochlea: a review. Am J Otolaryngol. 1986;7(2):73–99.
10. Kuhn M, Heman-Ackah SE, Shaikh JA, Roehm PC. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a review of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Trends Amplif. 2011;15(3):91–105.
org/10.1177/1084713811408349.
11. Shaia FT, Sheehy JL. Sudden sensori-neural hearing impairment: a report of 1,220 cases. Laryngoscope. 1976;86:389.
12. Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, Bontempo LJ, Faucett EA, Finestone SA, Hollingsworth DB, Kelley DM, Kmucha ST, Moonis G, Poling GL, Roberts JK, Stachler RJ, Zeitler DM, Corrigan MD, Nnacheta LC, Sattereld L. Clinical practice guide­line: sudden hearing loss (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(1_Suppl):S1–S45.
13. Rance G. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(1):1–43. Review.
14. Mijovic T, Zeitouni A, Colmegna I. Autoimmune sen­sorineural hearing loss: the otology–rheumatology interface. Rheumatology. 2013;52(5):780–89.
15. Sismanis A, Thompson T, Willis HE. Methotrexate therapy for autoimmune hearing loss: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:932.
16. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a con­ventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125(6):596–606.
17. Kraus EM, Shohet JA, Catalano PJ. Envoy esteem totally implantable hearing system: phase 2 trial, 1-year hearing results. Otolaryngol HNS. 2011;145:100–9.
18. Kozlowski K, Friedland DR. Implantable hearing devices. Curr Surg Rep. 2014;2:59.
https://doi.
AL GRAWANY
Tinnitus andHyperacusis
AishaLarem, Ma’inAliAl Shawabkeh, andWalidOmer
11
11.1 Introduction
Tinnitus is dened as a perception of sound with no external stimulus [1]. It is considered chronic if it lasts more than 3 months. Tinnitus is divided into two entities: Subjective tinnitus in which only the patient can hear it, and Objective tinni- tus, where others can detect it by either a stetho­scope or ear canal microphone [2, 3]. Objective tinnitus can be pulsatile or non-pulsatile. Hyperacusis is considered a central phenomenon that is dened as an unusual tolerance to ordinary environmental sounds. Most of the cases of hyper­acusis have unknown pathology. Hyperacusis and tinnitus can coexist with each other.
11.2 Tinnitus
11.2.1 Subjective Non-pulsatile Tinnitus
• Half of the patients have tinnitus in both ears.
In those who have it unilateral, it is more com­mon on the left side [3].
A. Larem (*) · M. A. Al Shawabkeh · W. Omer Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar e-mail: alarem@hamad.qa; MAIGhshoum@hamad.qa;
Womer@hamad.qa
• The prevalence increases with age [4].
• Risk factors: age, male sex, lower education and annual income level, more than 15h per week of noise exposure at work, poor health condition, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, head trauma, smok­ing, and alcohol [1, 5].
• Possible etiologies:
– Certain otologic diseases can present with
tinnitus (called syndromic tinnitus). For example, Otosclerosis, Meniere’s disease, and vestibular schwannoma [3].
– Certain medications can cause tinnitus like
salicylates, aminoglycosides, quinine, and platinum-based antineoplastic medication [3].
– Tinnitus is associated with depression and
anxiety [6].
– Look at Table11.1 for some medical con-
ditions that can lead to tinnitus [7].
• Pathophysiology:
– Any pathology that can damage the audi-
tory system can lead to tinnitus like:
Damage to outer hair cells [8]. Disturbance of intracellular calcium level (can be caused by specic medica­tion and noise) [8]. Damage to the inner ear can cause the downregulation of the inhibitory path­way leading to spontaneous ring of nerves [9].
• Subtypes:
• Look at Table11.2 [2].
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 A. Al-Qahtani et al. (eds.), Textbook of Clinical Otolaryngology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54088-3_11
121
122
A. Larem et al.
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Table 11.1 Some medical conditions that can lead to
tinnitus
– Sensorineural hearing loss: Sudden sensorineural
hearing loss, Meniere’s disease, vestibular schwannoma, noise-induced hearing loss, and presbycusis.
Conductive hearing loss: otitis media, ossicular
dislocation, and otosclerosis.
Endocrine: pregnancy and thyroid disease.
– –
Metabolic: Vitamin deciencies and hyperlipidemia. Medications: salicylates, aminoglycosides, quinine,
platinum-based antineoplastic medication, and antihypertensive medication.
Head trauma.
Neurological diseases like meningitis, multiple
sclerosis, and stroke.
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) syndrome.
– –
Depression and anxiety.
Table 11.2 Subjective tinnitus subtypes
Hearing loss subtype Somatic tinnitus subtype Typewriter tinnitus Musical tinnitus Intrusive Associated with affective disorder
induced injury to the cochlea, metabolic injury, and vascular injury. Taking in consid­eration other comorbidities that become more prevalent by aging like diabetes, which can affect the cochlear function [2].
11.2.1.2 Somatic Tinnitus Subtype
• It means the tinnitus in which somatic stimu­lation can modulate the loudness and pitch of the tinnitus [10].
• Examples:
– The tinnitus that occurs after the removal
of vestibular schwannoma. In some of those patients, tinnitus can be modulated by exaggerating eye movement, leg movement, or cutaneous stimulation of the hand [2].
– Another example is tinnitus that can occur
with the temporomandibular joint disorder. Jaw movement and pressure over the joint can modulate the tinnitus in some of these patients [2].
• Somatic tinnitus can be responsive to acu­puncture treatment or electrical stimulation of the ear and scalp [2].
11.2.1.1 Hearing Loss Subtype
• Mainly includes noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and presbycusis.
• NIHL:
– The prevalence of tinnitus in NIHL is
50–70%.
– Intense sound exposure causes a reduction
in blood ow to the cochlea leading to reactive oxygen and nitrogen molecules, which have a damaging effect on the cells.
– Certain medicines like Vitamin E, salic-
ylates, and N-acetylcysteine have anti­oxidant effects and can give some neuroprotection [2].
• Presbycusis:
– The prevalence of tinnitus in NIHL is
70%.
– In those patients, hearing loss is not only
attributed to the age, but in fact, it is a com­bination of the cumulative effect of noise-
11.2.1.3 Typewriter Tinnitus
• It is chronic intermittent and has staccato quality [2].
• It is believed that it is caused by vascular com­pression of the ipsilateral auditory nerve [11].
• It can be misdiagnosed by objective tinnitus caused by muscular origin [2].
• It can be responsive to Carbamazepine ther­apy [11].
• Other types of subjective tinnitus include musical tinnitus, intrusive, and associated with affective disorder [2].
• Evaluation:
– Identify the features of the tinnitus from
history like: The laterality. Continuous or intermittent. Pulsatile or not, the tone. Is it hissing, humming, sizzling, buzzing,
or roaring.
AL GRAWANY