Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3658_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •2 Principles of radiofrequency and microwave tumor ablation
- •Cooling in microwave ablation
- •Pulsed RF application
- •Operator and technique
- •Choice of applicator
- •Overlapping techniques
- •Introduction
- •Biology of heating
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Microwave ablation
- •Energy-deposited technology
- •Multitine applicators
- •Internally cooled electrodes
- •Perfused electrodes
- •Ancillary procedures
- •Combination therapies
- •Combining RF with transarterial chemoembolization
- •Combining RF with chemotherapy
- •Combining RF ablation with radiation
- •Patient selection
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •3 Principles of irreversible electroporation
- •Introduction
- •Numerical simulations
- •Clinical considerations
- •Clinical experience
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •4 Principles of high-intensity focused ultrasound
- •Introduction
- •History
- •Ablation
- •Hyperthermia
- •Thermal dose concept
- •Cavitation
- •Histotripsy
- •Microstreaming
- •HIFU system technology
- •Ultrasound guidance
- •MRI guidance
- •HIFU devices
- •Clinical applications
- •Prostate
- •Breast
- •Liver
- •Bone
- •Emerging applications
- •Targeted drug delivery
- •Blood–brain barrier disruption
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •5 Principles of tumor embolotherapy and chemoembolization
- •Tumor embolotherapy
- •General indications
- •Embolic materials
- •Gelfoam
- •Coils
- •Absolute ethanol
- •Microspheres
- •Pre-embolization evaluation
- •Roadmap and superselective arteriography
- •Chemoembolization
- •Basic principle
- •Chemotherapeutic agents used for chemoembolization
- •Lipiodol chemoembolization
- •Subsegmental chemoembolization
- •Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE)
- •References
- •6 Principles of radioembolization
- •Introduction
- •Mechanism of radioembolization
- •Radioembolic material
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Imaging considerations
- •Base and follow-up cross-sectional imaging
- •Localization imaging (nuclear medicine imaging)
- •Determining treatment dosage (activity)
- •(Y-90) SIR-Sphere
- •(Y-90) TheraSphere
- •Microcatheters
- •(Y-90) SIR-Sphere
- •(Y-90) TheraSphere
- •Radiation safety considerations
- •Patient release
- •Radiation safety considerations for cases involving surgery
- •Radiation safety considerations in case of autopsy, burial, or cremation
- •References
- •Background
- •Regional delivery of the drug leads to increased local concentration
- •Increased local concentration leads to increased therapeutic response
- •Regional delivery of a drug leads to decreased systemic exposure
- •5-Fluorouracil
- •Irinotecan
- •Oxaliplatin
- •Hepatic artery combination chemotherapy administration
- •Hepatic intra-arterial infusion of irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI)
- •Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies
- •Future research
- •Regional therapy pharmacology appendix
- •Pharmacology appendix
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Imaging for procedure planning
- •Imaging for device delivery
- •Advances in real-time imaging
- •Three-dimensionality
- •Navigation
- •Robotics
- •Combining best systemic chemotherapy with best HAI strategy
- •Open access to the patient
- •Radiation exposure
- •Intraprocedural monitoring
- •Imaging for therapy assessment
- •Summary
- •References
- •9 Novel developments in MR assessment of treatment response after locoregional therapy
- •Anatomic biomarkers
- •The volumetric approach
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •10 Assessment and triage of hepatocellular carcinoma
- •Summary
- •Introduction
- •Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma
- •Diagnostic criteria
- •Clinical staging
- •Triage of hepatocellular carcinoma
- •Liver transplantation
- •Surgical resection
- •Image-guided ablation
- •Transarterial treatment
- •Systemic treatment
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •11 Image-guided ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma
- •Introduction
- •Very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma
- •Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Celiac trunk anatomy
- •Normal celiac trunk anatomy and variations
- •Celiac stenosis or occlusion
- •Hepatic artery anatomy
- •Intrahepatic variations in branching segmental hepatic arteries
- •Non-hepatic arteries arising from hepatic arteries
- •Pancreaticoduodenal arteries
- •Extrahepatic collateral arteries
- •Anatomy of extrahepatic collateral arteries
- •Inferior phrenic arteries
- •Internal mammary arteries
- •Intercostal and lumbar arteries
- •Omental arteries
- •Adrenal arteries
- •Renal and renal capsular arteries
- •Gastric arteries
- •Colic branches
- •Transcatheter management of extrahepatic collateral arteries
- •References
- •Background
- •Patient selection and contraindications for TACE and DEB-TACE
- •Technique
- •Follow-up and evaluation of response to treatment
- •Clinical outcome
- •Combination therapies
- •Conclusion and outlook
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Technique
- •Dosimetry
- •Adverse events and toxicities
- •Clinical outcomes
- •References
- •15 Image-guided therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- •Curative therapies
- •Percutaneous ablation
- •Non-curative therapies
- •Chemoembolization
- •Radioembolization
- •Multidisciplinary approach
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Ablation modalities
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Cryoablation
- •Microwave ablation
- •Irreversible electroporation
- •Laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy
- •Discussion
- •References
- •17 Assessment, triage, and chemoembolization for colorectal liver metastases
- •Assessment of the patient with liver metastases
- •Triage of patients with liver metastases
- •Resection
- •Ablation
- •Intra-arterial chemoinfusion
- •Systemic therapy
- •Chemoembolization
- •Patient selection for chemoembolization
- •Chemoembolization regimens
- •“Conventional” cocktails
- •Drug-eluting microsphere platforms
- •Technical aspects of chemoembolization
- •Loading
- •Technique for drug-eluting microsphere embolization
- •Delivery endpoints
- •Outcomes with drug-eluting microspheres
- •Summary
- •References
- •18 Radioembolization for colorectal liver metastases
- •Introduction
- •Patient presentation
- •Preimplantation workup procedure
- •Treatment process
- •Dosimetry and dose calculation
- •TheraSphere
- •SIR-Spheres
- •Postprocedural care and follow-up
- •Postprocedure considerations
- •Postembolization syndrome (20–30%)
- •CT/PET evaluation of tumor response
- •Radioembolization combined with second- or third-line chemotherapy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •19 Assessment, triage, and liver-directed therapies for neuroendocrine tumor metastases
- •Terminology
- •Demographics and epidemiology
- •Diagnosis
- •Prognosis
- •Multidisciplinary triage of neuroendocrine neoplasms
- •Systemic therapies
- •Surgical management
- •Image-guided therapy
- •Tumor ablation
- •Hepatic arterial therapy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •20 Preoperative portal vein embolization
- •Mechanisms of liver regeneration
- •Rate of liver regeneration
- •Standard approaches
- •Additional approaches
- •PVE in conjunction with transarterial therapies
- •Extent of embolization
- •Embolic materials
- •Complications
- •General indications
- •General contraindications
- •Underlying liver disease
- •High-dose chemotherapy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Photodynamic therapy
- •Radiotherapy
- •References
- •Clinical overview
- •Staging
- •Diagnosis
- •Treatment options
- •Surgery
- •Percutaneous techniques
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Background
- •Histology of RFA
- •Microwave ablation
- •Background
- •Histology
- •Cryoablation
- •Background
- •Histology of cryoablation
- •Indications for percutaneous ablation
- •Patient factors
- •Preablation imaging
- •Adjunctive procedures
- •Technique
- •Anesthesia
- •Modality for guidance
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Microwave ablation
- •Cryoablation
- •Adjacent structures
- •Postprocedure follow-up
- •Complications
- •Treatment of metastatic disease
- •Surgical and RFA options
- •Medical therapies
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •23 Embolotherapy in the management of renal cell carcinoma
- •Introduction
- •Basic concepts
- •Embolization technique
- •Preoperative embolization
- •Radical nephrectomy
- •Partial nephrectomy
- •Postoperative embolization
- •Palliative embolization
- •Complications
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Physics of ablation therapy
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Microwave ablation
- •Cryoablation
- •Irreversible electroporation
- •Performing ablation therapy
- •Patient selection
- •Procedure
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Microwave ablation
- •Cryoablation
- •Irreversible electroporation
- •Imaging follow-up
- •Radiofrequency ablation
- •Microwave ablation
- •Cryoablation
- •Irreversible electroporation
- •Comparison of thermal ablation techniques
- •Applications and outcomes for thoracic ablation
- •Palliation
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Indications for treatment
- •Preprocedural imaging
- •Contraindications to ablation treatment
- •RFA technique
- •RFA pain palliation outcomes
- •Cryoablation technique
- •Cryoablation pain palliation outcomes
- •Emerging technologies
- •Summary
- •References
- •26 Cementoplasty and musculoskeletal interventions
- •Introduction
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Technique
- •Postprocedural care and follow-up
- •Current bone cement properties and future directions
- •Percutaneous sacroplasty, osteoplasty, and advance hybrid stabilization techniques
- •Summary
- •References
- •27 Prostate ablations
- •Introduction
- •Patient selection
- •Cancer detection and treatment guidance
- •Patient selection
- •Targeting strategies
- •Image guidance for prostate ablation
- •Ultrasound guidance
- •MR guidance
- •Computed tomography guidance
- •Positron emission tomography guidance
- •Prostate ablation techniques
- •High-intensity focused ultrasound
- •Cryoablation
- •Other techniques
- •Postprocedure evaluation
- •Complications and outcomes
- •Local control
- •Conclusion
- •Acknowledgments
- •References
- •Indications
- •Rationale
- •Technique
- •Catheter positioning
- •Contraindications
- •Results
- •Port/catheter placement
- •Chemotherapy
- •Description
- •Indications
- •Preoperative assessment
- •Catheter tip location
- •Update on vein thrombosis prophylaxis and treatment
- •Catheter-related infection
- •References
- •29 Palliative care and symptom management
- •Palliative care and communication with cancer patients
- •Communication with cancer patients
- •Prognostication
- •Medical symptom management
- •Pain
- •Non-opioid analgesics
- •Opioid analgesics
- •Adjuvant analgesics
- •Bone metastases
- •Nausea and vomiting
- •Constipation
- •Constitutional symptoms
- •Ascites
- •Psychiatric symptoms
- •Depression
- •Anxiety
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Celiac plexus neurolysis
- •Anatomy
- •Technique
- •Positioning and approach
- •Antecrural
- •Retrocrural
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Superior hypogastric neurolysis
- •Anatomy
- •Technique
- •Positioning and approach
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Ganglion impar neurolysis
- •Anatomy
- •Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Management of ascites
- •Diuretics and sodium restriction
- •Large-volume paracentesis
- •Permanent indwelling catheters
- •Pigtail or Cope-type loop catheter
- •PleurX and Asept catheters
- •Peritoneal Port-A-Catheters
- •Thoracentesis
- •Chest drainage catheters
- •Pigtail catheters
- •Tunneled catheters
- •Summary of recommendations and guidelines
- •References
- •Index

Chapter5:Tumor embolotherapy and chemoembolization
A
A
B
B
Figure 5.6 Preparation of a mixture of Lipiodol and doxorubicin. (A) Pumping
method used to mix Lipiodol and doxorubicin with two syringes connected
via a three-way stopcock. (B) Light photomicrograph shows the formation
of oil-in-water-type emulsion with variable-sized (10–50 μm) water droplets
containing doxorubicin hydrochloride in the oil base.
Figure 5.7 Basic concept and ideal endpoint of subsegmental Lipiodol
chemoembolization. (A) The diagram illustrates the exclusive arterial supply for
encapsulated nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and mixed arterial and
portal venous supply for the portion of extracapsular invasion and small HCC
without capsule formation. (B) After injection of sufficient amount of a mixture
of Lipiodol and anticancer drug through a tumor-feeding artery, the tumor
neovasculature and the peripheral portal veins around the tumor are filled with
oftheemulsioncanbemoreenhancedbyadjustingthespecic
gravity of the contrast medium dissolving chemotherapeutic
drugsclosetothespecicgravityofLipiodol.
35
Subsegmental chemoembolization
ebloodsupplyoflivertumorsisdependentontheirdevelopmentalstages and growth patterns. Whereas encapsulated
nodular HCCs are totally supplied by the hepatic artery,
well-dierentiated or early HCCs, small nodular tumors
(i.e., daughter nodules), intrahepatic metastases, and the
extracapsular inltrating edges of advanced HCCs are suppliedbyboththeportalveinandthe hepatic artery.
36,37
Even
in advanced-stage disease, most liver metastases have a distinct portal blood supply to the tumor periphery.
38,39
ese
tumors with portal blood supply may therefore be resistant
tointra-arterialembolotherapy,whichiswhyitis important
tosimultaneouslychemoembolize hepaticarterialandportal
venoussupplies.Ifa sucientamountofLipiodol-anticancer
drugemulsionisinjectedtothetumor-feedingartery,Lipiodol
carrying an anticancer drug accumulates not only in the
the emulsion. Subsequent hepatic artery embolization (arrows) may result in the
effect of combined arterial and portal blockage, and tumor fraction with mixed
arterial and portal venous supply can be treated effectively by the combined
effect of high-dose chemotherapy and ischemia.
tumor vessels but also in the peripheral portal veins surroundingthetumorthrougharterioportalcommunicationsor
tumor-drainingveins.Subsequentparticulateembolizationof
tumor-feedingarterycancausethecompletedevascularization
ofthetumor.isis the basicconcept and ideal endpointof
subsegmental or ultraselective Lipiodol chemoembolization
forsmallhepatictumors40(Figure5.7).
Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE)
Another recent strategy for improving the pharmacokinetic
proleandtherapeuticeectofTACEistheuseofdrug-eluting
beads (DEBs).41 DEBs are biocompatible, non-resorbable
PVA-based microspheres that can be loaded with various
chemotherapeutic agents42(Figure 5.8). e loaded beads
can occlude the feeding vessels of the tumor, while the
39

Section II:Principles of image-guided therapies
AB C
Figure 5.8 DC Bead spheres. (A) A bottle
of DC Bead spheres (doxorubicin-capable
beads, Biocompatible, UK) of 100–300-mm
size. (B) A bottle containing DC Beads
after mixing with doxorubicin solution for
1 hour. (C) Microscopic view of DC Beads of
100–300 mm. (D) Microscopic view of red-tinged
D
DC Beads containing doxorubicin after soaking
in drug solution.
chemotherapeuticagent is released in a slow and controlled
manner,achievingahigherandmoresustainedreleaseofdrug
directlyintothetumorandalowreleaseofdrugintothesystemiccirculationtoreducesystemictoxicity.
Currently, two types of microsphere are clinically available: the DC Bead microspheres (Biocompatibles, Farhan,
UK) and superabsorbent polymer-based HepaSphere/
QuadraSphere microspheres (Merit Medical, South Jordan,
UT).eDEBsrangeinsizefrom100to900μm,andsmaller
beaddiametersachieveamoredistalembolizationandamore
extensivenecrosisascomparedwithlargerbeads.43Preclinical
andclinicalstudieshavedemonstratedthatDEB-TACEresults
inhighertumorconcentrationsandlowersystemicconcentrations of doxorubicin compared to conventional TACE.
Ina multicenter,randomized,prospectivephaseIIstudy,signicantreductions in livertoxicityand drug-related adverse
eventswere shown for DEB-TACEover conventional TACE.
Irinotecan DEBs administered in TACE have also been
reportedtobeactiveandsafeinpatientswithlivermetastases
fromcolorectalcancer.
47
eweakpointofconventionalTACEisthattherehasbeen
a wide variability in the choice of chemotherapeutic agents,
dosage,embolizingagents,andproceduraltechniques.Because
ofthis substantial heterogeneity of TACEprotocols, conventionalTACEhasbeencriticizedasanon-standardizedmethod
and surrounded by substantial controversy in the treatment
ofHCC.However,DEB-TACEprovidesarelativelystandardizedprotocol,aswellaslevelsofconsistencyandrepeatability
thatarenotavailablewithconventionalTACE,andoersthe
opportunity to implement a standardized approach to HCC
treatment.
46
42,44–46
Superselective catheterization and C-armCT
DuringTACE,asuperselective(i.e.,segmentalorsubsegmental)approachisrecommendedwheneverpossible.Recenttechnological advances in C-arm CT and microcatheter systems
haveimprovedthetechnical success ratesforthesuperselectiveor ultraselectivecatheterizationoftumor-feedingarteries
(Figure5.9).Microcathetersareavailableinvariablesizes,from
thelargerbore (outerdiameter3F) tovery small bore(2For
lower).Amicrocathetershouldbenavigatedtoanappropriate
position,withembolizationperformedasselectivelyaspossibletoavoidthenecrosisofnon-targetliverparenchyma.
C-arm CT is a recent technical breakthrough in digital
subtraction angiography systems that makes it possible to
obtain multiplanar CT-like images and three-dimensional
volume-rendered or maximum-intensity-projection images
fromasinglerotationalacquisition.48C-armCTcanprovide
valuableinformationabout the arterial supplyto tumors not
visible on conventional angiography, and about the blood
supplyoftumorslocatedindicultareassuchasthecaudate
lobe.49Itcanalso allowoperatorstoidentifyandcharacterize
tumorsthat are not clearly characterized on angiographyor
cross-sectionalimaging,48aswell astodierentiatepseudolesions(e.g.,arterioportalshunts)fromtumors.50C-armCTis
also helpful for detecting extrahepatic supply and avoiding
chemotherapeutic delivery to the extrahepatic arteries that
supply other organs. Several studies have demonstrated the
usefulnessofC-armCTduringchemoembolization,inthatit
providesadditionalinformationthatisnotavailableinconventionalangiographyimages andincreasesoperatorcondence
incatheterpositioning.
48
40

A CB
D
Chapter5:Tumor embolotherapy and chemoembolization
FE
G
Figure 5.9 A case of superselective chemoembolization for multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma using C-arm computed tomography (CT). (A) Celiac
arteriogram shows multiple hypervascular tumors in the liver. (B) Maximum-intensity projection image obtained by C-arm CT shows all hypervascular
tumors with their feeding arteries. (C, D) Superselective chemoembolization was performed using 2F-tip microcatheter under the guidance of C-arm CT.
(E) Postchemoembolization spot image shows compact Lipiodol uptake within the tumors and their surrounding portal veins. (F, G) Non-contrast CT images
obtained on the same day after chemoembolization show subsegmental distribution of Lipiodol uptake, along with compact Lipiodol uptake within the tumors
(arrows) and surrounding portal veins.
References
1. SeldingerSI.Catheterplacementoftheneedleinpercutaneous
arteriography.Acta Radiol1953;39:368–376.
2. RöschJ,DotterCT,BrownMJ.Selectivearterialembolization.
Anewmethodforcontrolofacutegastrointestinalbleeding.
Radiology1972;102:303–306.
3. EllmanBA,ParkhillBJ,CurryTS3rd,etal.Ablationofrenal
tumorswithabsoluteethanol:anewtechnique.Radiology1981;
141:619–626.
4. SoulenMC,FaykusMHJr.,Shalnsky-GoldbergRD,etal.
Electiveembolizationforpreventionofhemorrhage
fromrenalangiomyolipomas.J Vasc Interv Radiol1994;
5:587–591.
5. YamadaR,SatoM,KawabataM,etal.Hepaticartery
embolizationin120patientswithunresectablehepatoma.
Radiology1983;148:397–401.
6. ChuangVP,SooCS,WallaceS,etal.Arterial
occlusion:managementofgiantcelltumorandaneurysmal
bonecyst.AJR Am J Roentgenol1981;136:1127–1130.
7. GoodwinSC,VedanthamS,McLucasB,etal.Preliminary
experiencewithuterinearteryembolizationforuterinebroids.
J Vasc Interv Radiol1997;8:517–526.
8. DoyonD,MouzonA,JourdeAM,etal.Hepaticarterial
embolizationinpatientswithmalignantlivertumors.Ann
Radiol (Paris)1974;17:593–603.
9. ReuterSR,ChuangVP,BreeRL.Selectivearterialembolization
forcontrolofmassiveuppergastrointestinaltractbleeding.AJR
Am J Roentgenol1975;125:119–126.
41

Section II:Principles of image-guided therapies
10. NishiokaY,KyotaniS,OkamuraM,etal.Astudyofembolizing
materialsforchemo-embolizationtherapyofhepatocellular
carcinoma:eectsofparticlesizeanddoseonchitin-containing
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)albuminmicrosphere
antitumoractivityinVX2hepatictumormodelrabbits.Biol
Pharm Bull1994;17:1251–1255.
11. GunjiT,KawauchiN,AkahaneM,etal.Long-termoutcomesof
transcatheterarterialchemoembolizationwithautologousblood
clotforunresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma.Int J Oncol2002;
21:427–432.
12. TadavarthySM,MollerJH,AmplatzK.Polyvinylalcohol(Ivalon)–
anewembolicmaterial.AJR Am J Roentgenol1975;125:609–616.
13. DotterCT,GoldmanML,RöschJ.Instantselectivearterial
occlusionwithisobutyl-2-cyanoacrylate.Radiology1975;
114:227–230.
14. ChoKJ,ReuterSR,SchmidtR.Eectsofexperimentalhepatic
arteryembolizationonhepaticfunction.AJR Am J Roentgenol
1976;127:563–567.
15. ChuangVP,SooCS,WallaceS.Ivalonembolization
inabdominalneoplasms.AJR Am J Roentgenol1981;
136:729–733.
16. ChuangVP,WallaceS.Hepaticarterialredistributionfor
intraarterialinfusionofhepaticneoplasms.Radiology1980;
135:295–299.
17. ParkJH,JeonSC,KangHS,etal.Transcatheterrenalarterial
embolizationwithmixtureofethanolandLipiodol.Invest
Radiol1986;21:577–580.
18. ParkJH,KimWS,HanMC,etal.Renalarterialembolization
withabsoluteethanol.J Korean Med Sci1987;2:13–18.
19. MatsuiO,KadoyaM,YoshikawaJ,etal.Smallhepatocellular
carcinoma:treatmentwithsubsegmentaltrans-catheterarterial
embolization.Radiology1993;188:79–83.
20. LaurentA.Microspheresandnonsphericalparticlesfor
embolization.Tech Vasc Interv Radiol2007;10:248–256.
21. BaekJH,ChungJW,JaeHJ,etal.Anewtechniquefor
superselectivecatheterizationofarteries:preshapingofa
micro-guidewireintoashepherd’shookform.Korean J Radiol
2007;8:225–230.
22. KanZ,IvancevK,LunderquistA.Peribiliaryplexa–an
importantpathwayforshuntingofiodizedoilandsilicon
rubbersolutionfromthehepaticarterytotheportalvein.An
experimentalstudyinrats.Invest Radiol1994;29:671–676.
23. SigurdsonER,RidgeJA,KemenyN,etal.Tumorandliverdrug
uptakefollowinghepaticarteryandportalveininfusion.J Clin
Oncol1987;5:1836–1840.
24. YuAS,KeeeEB.Managementofhepatocellularcarcinoma.Rev
Gastroenterol Disord2003;3:8–24.
25. KruskalJB,HlatkyL,HahnfeldtP,etal.Invivoandinvitro
analysisoftheeectivenessofdoxorubicincombinedwith
temporaryarterialocclusioninlivertumors.J Vasc Interv Radiol
1993;4:741–747.
26. KonnoT.Targetingcancerchemotherapeuticagentsbyuseof
Lipiodolcontrastmedium.Cancer1990;66:1897–1903.
27. SasakiY,ImaokaS,KasugaiH,etal.Anewapproachto
chemoembolizationtherapyforhepatomausingethiodizedoil,
cisplatin,andgelatinsponge.Cancer1987;60:1194–1203.
28. RamseyDE,KernagisLY,SoulenMC,etal.Chemoembolization
ofhepatocellularcarcinoma.J Vasc Interv Radiol2002;
13:S211–S221.
29. MarelliL,StiglianoR,TriantosC,etal.Transarterialtherapyfor
hepatocellularcarcinoma:whichtechniqueismoreeective?
Asystematicreviewofcohortandrandomizedstudies.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2007;30:6–25.
30. NakamuraH,TanakaT,HoriS,etal.Transcatheter
embolizationofhepatocellularcarcinoma:assessmentofecacy
incaseofresectionfollowingembolization.Radiology1983;
147:401–405.
31. NakajoM,KobayashiH,ShimabukuroK,etal.Biodistribution
andinvivokineticsofiodine-131Lipiodolinfusedviathe
hepaticarteryofpatientswithhepaticcancer.J Nucl Med1988;
29:1066–1077.
32. KanZ,SatoM,IvancevK,etal.Distributionandeect
ofiodizedpoppyseedoilintheliveraerhepaticartery
embolization:experimentalstudyinseveralanimalspecies.
Radiology1993;186:861–866.
33. RaoulJL,HeresbachD,BretagneJF,etal.Chemoembolization
ofhepatocellularcarcinomas:astudyofthebiodistribution
andpharmacokineticsofdoxorubicin.Cancer1992;
70:585–590.
34. NakamuraH,HashimotoT,OiH,etal.Transcatheteroily
chemoembolizationofhepatocellularcarcinoma.Radiology
1989;170:783–786.
35. SakaguchiH,UchidaH,NishimuraY,etal.Pharmacokinetic
studyofAdriamycinintheemulsionmixedwithLipiodol–
dierenceresultingfromcompositionandmethodsof
preparation,andbehavioraermesentericarterialinjectionin
rat.Gan To Kagaku Ryoho1991;18:1349–1355.
36. GosekiN,NosakaT,EndoM,etal.Nourishmentof
hepatocellularcarcinomacellsthroughtheportalbloodow
withandwithouttranscatheterarterialembolization.Cancer
1995;76:736–742.
37. WakasaK,SakuraiM,KurodaC,etal.Eectoftranscatheter
arterialembolizationontheboundaryarchitectureof
hepatocellularcarcinoma.Cancer1990;65:913–919.
38. StrohmeyerT,HaugebergG,LierseW.Angioarchitecture
andbloodsupplyofmicro-andmacrometastasesinhuman
livers.Ananatomic–pathologicalinvestigationusinginjection
techniques.J Hepatol1987;4:181–189.
39. TaniguchiH,DaidohT,ShioakiY,etal.Bloodsupplyand
drugdeliverytoprimaryandsecondaryhumanlivercancers
studiedwithinvivobromodeoxyuridinelabeling.Cancer1993;
71:50–55.
40. MiyayamaS,MatsuiO,YamashiroM,etal.Ultraselective
transcatheterarterialchemoembolizationwith
a2-ftipmicrocatheterforsmallhepatocellular
carcinomas:relationshipbetweenlocaltumorrecurrenceand
visualizationoftheportalveinwithiodizedoil.J Vasc Interv
Radiol2007;18:365–376.
41. MoriseZ,SugiokaA,KatoR,etal.Transarterial
chemoembolizationwithdegradablestarchmicrospheres,
irinotecan,andmitomycin-Cinpatientswithlivermetastases.J
Gastrointest Surg2006;10:249–258.
42. VarelaM,RealMI,BurrelM,etal.Chemoembolizationof
hepatocellularcarcinomawithdrugelutingbeads:ecacyand
doxorubicinpharmacokinetics.J Hepatol2007;46:474–481.
43. GonzalezMV,TangY,PhillipsGJ,etal.Doxorubicin
elutingbeads-2:methodsforevaluatingdrugelutionand
in-vitro:in-vivocorrelation.J Mater Sci Mater Med2008;
19:767–775.
42

Chapter5:Tumor embolotherapy and chemoembolization
44. LewisAL,TaylorRR,HallB,etal.Pharmacokineticand
safetystudyofdoxorubicin-elutingbeadsinaporcinemodel
ofhepaticarterialembolization.J Vasc Interv Radiol2006;
17:1335–1343.
45. PoonRT,TsoWK,PangRW,etal.AphaseI/IItrialof
chemoembolizationforhepatocellularcarcinomausinganovel
intra-arterialdrug-elutingbead.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
2007;5:1100–1108.
46. LencioniR,deBaereT,BurrelM,etal.Transcathetertreatment
ofhepatocellularcarcinomawithdoxorubicin-loadedDCbead
48. TognoliniA,LouieJ,HwangG,etal.C-armcomputed
tomographyforhepaticinterventions:apracticalguide.J Vasc
Interv Radiol2010;21:1817–1823.
49. WallaceMJ,MurthyR,KamatPP,etal.ImpactofC-armCTon
hepaticarterialinterventionsforhepaticmalignancies.J Vasc
Interv Radiol2007;18:1500–1507.
50. SzeDY,RazaviMK,SoSK,etal.ImpactofmultidetectorCT
hepaticarteriographyontheplanningofchemoembolization
treatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma.Am J Roentgenol2001;
177:1339–1345.
(DEBDOX):technicalrecommendations.Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol2012;35:980–985.
47. AlibertiC,TilliM,BeneaG,etal.Trans-arterial
chemoembolization(TACE)oflivermetastasesfromcolorectal
cancerusingirinotecan-elutingbeads:preliminaryresults.
Anticancer Res2006;26:3793–3795.
43

Chapter
Principles of radioembolization
6
Vanessa L. Gates, Riad Salem, and Robert J. Lewandowski
Introduction
Radioembolization is dened as the administration of
micron-sized embolic particles loaded with a radionuclide
using percutaneous transarterial techniques. Fluoroscopic
guidance,angiographicendpointsofembolizationand stasis,
and the need to modify this based on angiographic ndings
makesthistreatmentatrueembolizationprocedure.Dosimetry
planning,theadministrationanddeliveryofradiationonthe
microscopiclevel,themodicationofthedosebasedontumor
and hepatic volume, in addition to the required knowledge
ofradiation eects on tissuemake this a brachytherapyprocedure.Radioembolizationthereforecombinesradiationwith
embolization.
Investigations into yttrium-90 (90Y) and other radionuclidesaspartofamicrosphereorparticleforthetreatmentof
cancerdatebacktothe1960s.
1,2
Initialstudiesof resin90Yin
humanswerereportedinthelate1970s.eseminalworkin
a canine liver model demonstrating the safety andfeasibility
ofusing90Ytherapyforhepaticmalignancieswasreportedin
the late 1980s.
3,4
Human studies of90Y microsphere therapy
in liver applicationsfollowedfrom the late 1980s through to
the1990s.
5–12
eseinvestigationsestablishedthesafetyof90Y
for intrahepatic applicationsas well as the tolerance of normalparenchymatoradioembolization.Itshouldbenotedthat
dierentdisciplinesuse slightly dierentnamesforradioembolization: microsphere brachytherapy, microbrachytherapy,
hepaticintra-arterialradiotherapy,andselectiveinternalradiationtherapy. e termradioembolizationwillbeusedinthis
chapter,asitisthepreferredtermperSocietyofInterventional
Radiologystandardsdocument.
13
Mechanism of radioembolization
Radioembolizationoflivertumortakesadvantageoftheunique
vascularsystemoftheliver.14Innormallivertissue,approximately 70–80% of the organ’s blood ow is supplied by the
portalvein,andthehepaticarteryaccountsfortherest.is
contrastswithbothhepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC)andmetastatictumorstotheliver,whichhaveapproximately80–100%
oftheirblood owsuppliedbythehepaticartery.isdierenceinperfusionisexploitedbyradioembolization,whereby
radioactivemicrospheresdopedwitharadionuclideareused
toproduceintentionalmicroembolizationofthetumorcapillary bed in the livertumor(s)by delivering the microspheres
throughthehepaticarteryand,subsequently,selectivelytargetingmalignantdisease.
e microembolic eect of radioembolization is due to
capillary blockage; theaveragesize of rst-levelcapillaries is
approximately7μmandtheaveragemicrosphere size ranges
from 25 to 32 μm. Sincethe range in the number ofmicrospheresis1–80millionmicrospherespertherapeuticadministration, the percentage of rst-level capillaries blocked is
0.1–11%. Depending on the number of administered microspheres,theemboliceectcanrangefrommildtomoderate.
Presently, the radiation therapy portion of radioembolizationis due tothepresenceof90Y.90Yisabeta-emitterwith
anaverageenergy of 0.9267 ± 0.0008 MeV and ahalf-life of
2.6684 ± 0.0013 days.15 e maximum range of the90Y beta
radiationinwateris 11 mm.16 Ninetypercent of the emitted
energy is absorbed withina sphere of water with aradiusof
5.3 mm.17 us, this radionuclideisideal for localized treatment. For completeness, it should be noted that90Y decays
over99.98%ofthetimeviaβ−decaytothegroundstateof90Zr.
Asmallfractionoftheradionuclide(~0.01%)β−decaystothe
excited0+stateof90Zr,whichsubsequentlydecaystotheground
stateviainternalconversion,internalpairproduction(e+e–),or
two-photonde-excitation.eminisculeinternalpairproductionbranchingratiois(31.86±0.47)×10–6andmightbeuseful
forthe non-destructive assay of90Y or for monitoring of the
depositionofthemicrosphereswithintheliver.
18–20
Eectsfromradiationarerelatedtotheradiationabsorbed
dose(dose), which is the energyabsorbedper mass of tissue
given in units of Gray (Gy). e schema developed by the
Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) Committee of the
SocietyofNuclearMedicineisthecurrentdosimetrystandard
for radioembolization.
13,21–23
is dosimetry method assumes
auniformdistributionoftheactivitythroughoutthe mass of
interest (treatment mass). For beta-particle decay, it is also
assumedthatthereisnoproductionofBremsstrahlungandthat
allofthedecayenergyiscompletelyabsorbedwithinthemass.
eradioactivesourceispermanentlyimplantedinthepatient
with no removalfrom the region,so theeective half-life is
Interventional Oncology, Second Edition, ed. Jean-François H.Geschwind and Michael C.Soulen. Published by Cambridge University Press.
©Cambridge University Press2016
44

Chapter6:Radioembolization
A
(kg)
AA AA
rL
.=++
simplythe radioactivehalf-life. Using all these assumptions,
theequationforcalculatingthedosebased on the treatment
activity(A)andthetreatmentmass(m)isgivenas:
(Gy) 49.38
D
= . Equation(1)
(GBq)
m
e doses to tumor,lung,andnormal liver tissue can be
further calculated based on the partition model, which is
describedbyHoet al.
24,25
Assumethatalloftheadministered
activityisdepositedinthenormalliver,tumor,orlungsgiving:
TotalNormalLiver Tumo
Equation(2)
ung
However,currentreportingstandardsusethehepaticlobar
dose(i.e.,thedosetotissuesuppliedbytherighthepaticartery,
le hepatic artery, or middle hepaticartery) so that clinical
resultscanbecomparedbetweeninstitutions.
13
Radioembolic material
Currently, two90Y-microsphere products are available commercially worldwide: one is composed of90Y-doped resin
(SIR-Spheres;SirtexMedical,NorthSydney,Australia)andthe
other incorporates90Y in a glass matrix (eraSphere; BTG,
Ottawa, Canada) (Table 6.1).
26,27
eraSphere was approved
in1999 by the Food andDrug Administration(FDA)under
a HumanitarianDevice Exemption(HDE) for the treatment
ofunresectable HCC in patients who can haveappropriately
positionedhepaticarterialcatheters.Medicalprofessionalsare
directedtoFDAguidancedocumentsonHDEsforusesindiseasesotherthanHCC.
SIR-Spheres® were granted full premarketing approval in
2002 by the FDA for the treatment of colorectal metastases
in conjunction with intrahepatic oxuridine (FUDR). Both
GiventheFDAapprovalforbothdevices,theiruseindisease
statesotherthanthestrictindicationrepresentsthepracticeof
medicine.Inotherwords,theuseofthistherapyforindications
other than HCC orcolorectal liver metastases is not experimental,butrathersupportedbyamplephaseIIdata.
Neithertypeofmicrospheredemonstratessignicantleach-
ingof90Y,inwhichthedosetothebonemarrowwouldexceed
0.05 Gy. For glass microspheres, the percent total yttrium
presentduetodissolutionofthe glass rangesfrom0.02%to
0.13%.28eSIR-Spheresusermanualdiscussesresinmicrosphereproperties.Ofnoteisthattraceamountsofradioactivity,25–50kBq/L/GBqdelivered,havebeendetectedinpatients’
urineduetothefree90Yproducedinthelabelingprocessof
resinmicrospheres.
Because90Y is dicult toimage,other radionuclides and
material have been investigated. Of particular interest is
holmium-166(
166
Ho).
166
Hopoly-l-lacticacid(PLLA)micro-
spheresareuniquebecausetheirdistributioncanbeimagedin
vivowithbothsingle-photonemissioncomputedtomography
(SPECT) (80.6 keV gamma 6–7%) and magnetic resonance
imaging. e therapeutic eect is due to two beta particles
thatareemittedwithmaximumenergyof1.77and1.85MeV.
166
Ho-PLLAmicrospheresareproducedfollowinggoodmanu-
facturingpracticeguidelines,asdescribedpreviouslybyNijsen
29–31
etal.
apydose 540 mg of
Foreachpatient,a scout dose of 60 mg andather-
165
Ho-PLLAmicrospheresarepacked in
high-densitypolyethylenevialswhichareirradiatedseparately
in a nuclear reactor.Each therapeutic vial contains approximately33 millionmicrospheres,with theaverageactivityper
microspherebeing 450 Bq.
32,33
e density of PLLA is similartoresinmicrospheres,1.4 g/cc,andthesizeis 30±5µm.
Currently,
166
Ho-PLLA-microspheres are not commercially
available.
devices are approved for the treatment of liver neoplasia in
Europe.eraSphereisalsoapprovedforthetreatmentofliver
neoplasiainCanada.SIR-Sphereshaveabroadapprovalforuse
inIndia,Australia,andseveralothercountriesintheFarEast.
Indications and contraindications
Success in treatment of tumors in the liver by radioembolization relies on the presence of appropriateindications that
Table 6.1 Properties of commercially available yttrium-90 (90Y)
microspheres
ensure patients receive benecial evidence-based therapy.
Since each microsphere product has dierent treatment
approvalcriteriaandproperties,eachcaseshouldbeindividu-
Description item SIR-Spheres TheraSphere
Sphere material Resin Glass
Sphere diameter
(μm)
Activity in single vial
(GBq)
Number of spheres
per vial
Density (g/cm3) 1.6 3.29
90
Y activation mode Sr-90 generator Reactor
Mean calibrated
activity
per sphere (Bq)
Shelf-life 24 hours after
20–60 20–30
3 3–20 (in 0.5-GBq
increments)
40–80 × 10
55 2,500
calibration
6
1.2–8 × 10
12 days after
calibration
6
ally evaluated to determine which product is best suitedfor
thediseasepresentation.Someofthemostgeneralindications
for radioembolization, as detailed in the Radioembolization
Brachytherapy Oncology Consortium (REBOC) report and
European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines,includeunresectable hepaticprimaryormetastaticdisease, liver-dominant disease, and life expectancy of at least
3months.
34,35
Fromthemostrecentguidelines(EANMguidelines35)for
SIR-Spheres,thefollowingisalistofspeciccontraindications:
• markedlyabnormalexcretoryliverfunctiontests
• ascitesorclinicalliverfailure
• abnormalvascularanatomythatwouldresultinsignicant
reuxofhepaticarterialbloodtothestomach,pancreas,
orbowel(determinedbypretreatmentangiogram).
NotethatinadvertentdeliveryofSIR-Spherestothe
45

Section II:Principles of image-guided therapies
gastrointestinaltractorpancreaswillcauseacute
abdominalpain,acutepancreatitis,orpepticulceration.
InadvertentdeliveryofSIR-Spherestothegallbladdermay
resultincholecystitis
• lungshuntingofthehepaticarterybloodowgreater
than20%(determinedbypretreatmentintra-arterial
technetium-99mmacro-aggregatedmicrosphere
99m
(
Tc-MAA)scintigraphy).Notethathighlevelsof
implantedradiationand/orexcessiveshuntingtothelung
mayleadtoradiationpneumonitis
• disseminatedextrahepaticmalignantdisease
• arelativecontraindicationconcernsprevious
andmaybeused in the assessment of treatmentresponse.If
patientsarereceivingchemotherapy,itisimportanttodiscontinuethetreatments2–3weeksbeforethebeginningoftreatmentwith90Ytoclearlyidentifytheagentresponsibleforany
subsequenttherapeuticresponse.Moreimportantly,itisessential to identify those patients receiving agents known to be
radiationsensitizers,suchas 5-uorouracil,capecitabine,and
gemcitabine.Radiationhepatitis,apotentiallyfatalcomplication,is a theoreticalconcernforpatientsreceivingradioembolization,particularlyifitisusedconcurrentlywithradiation
sensitizers.Pleaserefertomanufacturerdocumentationforthe
mostcurrentindicationsandcontraindications.
external-beamradiationtherapytothemajorvolumeof
theliver
• patientstreatedwithcapecitabinewithin2months
priortoradioembolizationorwhowillbetreatedwith
capecitabineatanytimefollowingtreatmentwith
SIR-Spheres
• mainportal-veinthrombosis
• patientstreatedwithangiogenesisinhibitorsthat
couldaectthequalityofthebloodvesselsandinduce
complicationsduringangiography.
Similarly,thefollowingisalistofspeciccontraindicationsfor
eraSpherefromthe most recent guidelines (EANM guidelines35)forradioembolization:
• anydepositiontothegastrointestinaltractthatmaynotbe
correctedbyangiographictechniques
• inthecaseofshuntingtothelungsthatcouldresultin
deliveryofgreaterthan30Gytothelungsfromasingle
treatmentor50Gyfromalltreatments.Ofnoteisthat
radiationpneumonitishasbeenseeninpatientsreceiving
dosestothelungsaslowas22Gywhenthepatienthas
beenconcurrentlytreatedwithradiosensitizingagent
• inthecaseofsevereliverdysfunctionorpulmonary
insuciency
• inltrativetumortype
• “bulkdisease”(tumorvolume>70%ofthetargetliver
Imaging considerations
Imagingofliverdiseaseisanimportantaspectofbothdiagnosisandfollowingpatientresponseposttreatment.efollowingsectionsdetailsomepossibleimagingprotocolsforvarious
modalities. As with all patient-trackingstudies,consistencyin
theimagingprotocolcourseisexceedinglyimportant.Alleorts
shouldbemadetoimageagivenpatientwiththesameprotocols
throughoutdiagnosis,treatment,andfollow-up.Localprotocols
deningtheappropriateimagingmodalitytouseforagivendisease presentationshouldbedevelopedto preventunnecessary
imagingexams.Periodic review ofsuchlocalprotocolsshould
bemadetoincorporatechangesinimagingstandards.
Treatment with radioembolization is based on
cross-sectionalimagesandarteriogramsforeachpatient.e
workupincludesthree-phase contrastcomputed tomography
(CT) and/or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonanceimaging
(MRI)oftheliverforassessmentoftumorandnon-tumorvolumes,portalvein patency,andextentofextrahepaticdisease.
Serumchemicalanalysesevaluatehepaticandrenal function
and determine the presence and magnitude of elevation of
tumormarkers.eclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendationsforradioembolizationpublishedbytheREBOCandthe
American Association of Physicist in Medicine Task Force
144 provide a good overview of the cross-sectional imaging
requiredforradioembolization.
36,37
volumeormultipletumornodules)
• aspartateaminotransferaseoralanineaminotransferase
>5timesupperlimitofnormal
• bilirubin>1timeupperlimitofnormal
• tumorvolume>50%combinedwithanalbumin<3g/dL
• patientstreatedwithangiogenesisinhibitorsthat
couldaectthequalityofthebloodvesselsandinduce
complicationsduringangiography.
In summary, the rst step in the evaluation of patients for
therapyincludescollectingahistoryandconductingaphysical
examination.Patientsshouldbe abletotoleratetreatment,as
bestassessedbyOkuda,EasternCooperativeOncologyGroup,
andKarnofskyscoreevaluation.Totalbilirubinlevelandprothrombintimeareimportantpredictorsofwhichpatientswill
toleratetreatment.Relevantinformationtobeelicitedincludes
a history of renal or hepatic failure, as well as pulmonary
compromisesuch as chronicobstructive pulmonary disease.
Tumormarkerssuchasalpha-fetoproteinshouldbemeasured
Base and follow-up cross-sectional imaging
Fromadiagnosticimagingstandpoint,carefulreviewofrecent
CTorMRIwithin2–4weeksoftreatmentiswarranted.When
the cross-sectional imagingmodality has beenreviewed and
thepatienthasbeendeemedacandidate,livervolumecalculationsareobtainedusingthelobarapproach.
Triple-phaseCT provides the fastest and most reproducibleimaging of the liver for volume calculation.Becausethe
treatmentapproachfor90Y is most commonly lobar, proper
imaging and volume calculation is essential for dosimetry
purposes.eabilitytounderstandhepaticanatomyrelieson
thesound understandingof the Couinaud hepatic segments.
Anatomically,themiddlehepaticveinseparatestherightand
lelobes.Whenregionsof interestaredrawnandlobarvolumesarecalculated,itisthemiddlehepaticvein thatshould
beusedas theanatomicdelineatorbetweenthe rightandle
lobes.Ifthemiddlehepaticveincannotbeseen,thegallbladder
46

Chapter6:Radioembolization
Table 6.2 Couinaud segments based on angiographic findings
39
Corresponding
right hepatic target
Angiographic ndings
Standard RHA and LHA 1, 5, 6, 7, 8 2, 3, 4
Replaced RHA with flow to medial segment of the left hepatic lobe 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 2, 3
Replaced RHA without flow to medial segment of the left hepatic lobe and standard LHA 1, 5, 6, 7, 8 2, 3, 4
Replaced LHA without flow to medial lobe 2, 3
Replaced LHA with flow to medial lobe 2, 3, 4
Accessory RHA 6, 7
RHA in the presence of an accessory RHA 5, 8
Middle hepatic artery (irrespective of origin) 4
RHA = right hepatic artery; LHA = left hepatic artery.
fossaandits axisrelativeto thelivermaybeused.is techniqueassumesstandardarterialanatomywithsinglerightand
lehepaticarteries.If variantsareobservedangiographically
(e.g.,anaccessoryrighthepaticartery),accurateangiographic
correlationsmustbeperformed when the regionsofinterest
forlobarorsegmentalvolumesaredrawn.Itmaybeusefulto
use at-panel cone-beam CT to determine the volumefrom
variantanatomy.
AcomprehensivereviewofhepaticarterialanatomyisprovidedbyLiuetal.38e mostcommonangiographicndings
andvariants,with theirassociatedtargetCouinaudsegments
(and hence required volumes), are listed in Table6.2.39 It is
incumbentonthe interventionalradiologist to have a sound
knowledge of these anatomic variants and their eects on
dosimetryandmicrospheredistribution.
MAAshouldbefractionatedduringtheplanningangiography
procedureinsuchamannerthattheentireliveris imagedin
onesetting.Forexample,apatientwithareplacedlehepatic
arteryshouldreceive37–74MBqofMAAinthereplacedle
hepaticartery,withtheother74–111MBqadministeredinthe
righthepaticartery.
CareshouldbetakenwhenadministeringtheMAAthrough
the microcatheter. A similar ow rate as thatwhich will be
usedfortreatmentshouldbefollowedtoavoidbackowdueto
higherpressurebehindthebolusinjection.edeliveryshould
beapproximately7mL/mintoavoidbackow.TimingofimagingaeradministrationofMAAisalso important.MAA isa
radionuclide/protein structure, which has a time-dependent
breakdownintosmallerparticlesoftheproteinaceousMAA,
with subsequent migration of these smaller fragments via
thenormalcapillary bed to the lungs and eventualexcretion
Localization imaging (nuclear medicine imaging)
Following the mapping angiography,
istered through an appropriately positioned microcatheter.
rough MAA scintigraphy, the liver-to-lung shunting fractionisdeterminedasdescribedinthepackageinsertsforglass
andresin microspheres.However,thereareseveral technical
nuancestotheassessmentofshunting.Ifa patienthasasolitaryHCCandifonlyonetreatmentisplanned,injectionofthe
MAAintothearterythatisintendedforinjectionisindicated
(inlobarorsegmental infusion). However,ifthediagnosis is
multifocal bilobar HCC, MAA injection and lung shunting
should be assessed before each treatment at the lobar level.
is is because HCC tumors located in dierent lobes may
shuntto varyingdegrees.Withoutthisinformation,the total
cumulative pulmonary dose may be inadvertently exceeded.
Inpatientswithmetastaticdisease,signicantshuntingisrare
unlessthetumorburdenisveryhigh.Hence,lungshuntingcan
beassessedoncewithcatheterplacementandMAAadministrationwithintheproperhepaticarteryatthetimeofplanning
visceral arteriography. If angiographic shunting is observed,
lobar MAA imaging is performed. In patients with variant
anatomyinwhichwhole-livershuntingassessmentisplanned,
fractionatedinjectionofMAAisrecommended.Dependingon
thevariantanatomythatisidentied,the148–185-MBqvialof
99m
Tc-MAA is admin-
throughthekidneys.ebiologicalhalf-life rangesfrom4to
6 hours, with a similar shelf-life that depends onthe manufacturer.Asa result,itisimportantthat theMAAbelabeled
withinanhourofadministration.eoptimalimagingtiming
windowis0–2hourspostMAAadministration;imagingmore
than2hoursaerMAAadministrationcouldresultinhigher
estimatesofhepatic-to-lungshunt.
Lungshuntfraction(LSF)estimatesmayalsobearticially
elevatedduetothesizeoftheMAAparticles.AlthoughthenormalmanufacturedsizeofMAAparticlesis30–90μm,statistically,asmallpercentageoftheseparticleswillfalloutsidethis
range.Ofparticularinterestarethoseparticlesthataresmaller
than8–10 μm, asthese will shuntthroughthenormal capillarysystem.iswillresultinanincreasein perceivedLSF.
Accordingtomostmanufacturers,fewerthan10%oftheMAA
particlesaresmallerthan10μm.Radiopharmaceuticalquality
assuranceisimportanttolimitingerrorduetothisprocess.
AnothersourceofarticiallyelevatedLSFistheamountof
freetechnetium.einterpretationoftheLSFandgastrointestinaluptakemusttakeintoconsiderationthepresenceofMAA
aswellasfree(Tc-99m)pertechnetate(usedtolabeltheMAA
particles).Uptakeinthethyroidand salivaryglandsandkidneys,as well as diuse gastric mucosal uptake, should not be
consideredshunting.Uptakein the gastric mucosa,thesmall
segments
Corresponding
left hepatic target
segments
47

Section II:Principles of image-guided therapies
Dm
(Gy)(kg)
49.38
×
(Gy)(kg)
49.38 (1 LSF)
×
m
bowel,orpancreasintheabsenceofsalivaryandthyroiduptake
should be interpreted with caution because it may represent
truegastrointestinalshunting.Again,caremustbetakeninthe
MAA quality assurance program for assessingthe amount of
free(Tc-99m)pertechnetatepresentinadosageofMAA.
An authorized user should not rely solelyon the SPECT
imagesoftheupperabdomentracttoabsolutelyexcludegastrointestinalshunting.Rather,itshouldbeconsideredanadjunctiveimagingmodality.Exclusionofgastrointestinalowshould
beaccomplishedbyuseofthecombinedinformationobtained
frommeticulous hepatic angiography, three-dimensionalCT
angiography, and SPECT imaging. Fusion of CT and MAA
SPECTimagesmaybehelpfulintheidenticationofextrahepaticowofMAA.
Currentclinical practiceusesplanarimagingforLSF.e
mostaccurateestimatefromplanarimagingusesbackground
and scatter-correctedlung region of interest(ROI)and liver
ROI. e net posterior counts and net anterior counts from
each ROI are combinedusing the geometricmean. e LSF
estimateisthenthesumofthegeometricmeanofthelelung
andrightlungdividedbythegeometricmeanoftheliveradded
tothegeometricmeanofthelungs.
Follow-up localization imaging can be performed using
either Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT or Y-90 positron emission
tomography(PET)/CT.DuetotheinherentpropertiesofPET/
CT, Y-90PET/CT oers improved resolution and specicity
whenusedforlocalization.
19,20
A
(GBq)
=
. Equation(4)
etreatmentactivityforeraSpheremayalsobereduced
to accommodate lung shunted activity by incorporating the
LSF(seeEquation5).
A D(GBq)
=
×−
. Equation(5)
Like SIR-Spheres, the estimated treatment activity may
be further reduced for patients who have received chemotherapy.Treatmentisnotrecommendedifthemeanlungdose
exceeds30Gypertreatmentor50Gyforalltreatmentswith
eraSphere.
Radioembolization:technical considerations
Microcatheters
ere are two specic considerations when deciding which
microcatheter to employ for delivery of radioactive microspheres. To ensure adequate delivery of at least 80% of the
microspheres,theinnerdiameterofthemicrocathetershould
atleastbe0.5mm(0.020inch).26esecondconsiderationis
thelengthofcatheter.emicrocathetermustbelongenough
toallowproperconnection tothedeliverydevice.Forexample,foreraSphere,the packageinsertinstructs the user to
connect to the microcatheter in a vertical connection such
thatgravitywillassistinpullingthemicrospheresthroughthe
Determining treatment dosage (activity)
Whileunderstandingtheowdynamicsandbloodsupplyfor
the tumor bed is important no matter the microsphere that
isused, each type ofmicrospherehas adierentmethodfor
determiningtheactivitythatistobeadministered.
microcatheterhub.
(Y-90) SIR-Sphere
SIR-Spheres must bedelivered slowly at a rate of no more
than 5 mL/min, as rapid delivery may cause reux back
intothe hepatic artery and subsequently other organs. e
(Y-90) SIR-Sphere
e package insert still indicates that the empirical method
using tumor burden is the activity determination technique.However,itisno longer the methodofchoicedueto
radiation-inducedliverdiseaseduetothehigherdosagesused
onlobartreatments.40ecurrentmethodforcalculatingthe
activitytobeadministeredisbasedontheDebois body surfacearea(BSA),fractionoftotalhepaticvolumebeingtreated
(VRF),thefractionoftumormassburden(TMB),andthelung
shuntreferencefraction (LSRF)from a table in the package
insert.eestimatedtreatmentactivitymayfurtherbereduced
forpatientswhohavereceivedchemotherapy.
microcatheter position must repeatedly be checked during
theprocedurewithuoroscopytoensureitremainscorrectly
positionedand that there isnotstagnant arterial ow with
resultantreux/non-targetembolization.is is performed
byinjectingcontrastmedium throughthele-handportof
thedeliveryset.Attheconclusionoftheprocedure,thecatheterisremoved.
(Y-90) TheraSphere
A complete infusion usually requires 4–12 mL/min infusion
rateusingatleast30mLofsaline.Attheconclusionoftheprocedure,thecatheterisremoved.
Treatmentactivity(GBq)=LSRF×VRF×
(BSA–0.2+TMB) Equation(3)
SIR-Sphere treatment is not recommended if the LSF%
exceeds20%.
(Y-90) TheraSphere
epackageinsertindicatesthattheMIRDmethodisusedto
determinetheactivitytobeadministered(seeequation1and
equation4).
Radiation safety considerations
Radiationsafetyisanimportantconsiderationin this procedure,giventhepotentiallyhighexposurefromhandlingtherapeuticamountsof90Y, a beta-emitter.erefore,theprimary
concern is exposure to the eyes, skin, and hands. Emissions
from90Ycan travel morethan a meter in airbutaresignicantlyreducedby1cmofacrylic.Staintheprocedureroom
duringradioembolizationshouldwearsafetygogglesorglasses
andworkbehindtheacrylicshieldsprovided.
48
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
