Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3658_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
Chapter12:Embolization of livertumors
http://internalmedicinebook.com
AB
AB
CD
Figure 12.16 Recognition of the accessory
left gastric artery. (A) The accessory left gastric artery (open arrowheads) arises from the segment 4 hepatic artery and the right gastric artery (white arrowheads) arises from the left lateral hepatic artery. (B) On portal phase, the segment 3 (black arrows) and segment 2 hepatic arteries (white arrows) have their accompanying portal vein. In contrast, the accessory left gastric artery does not have the accompanying portal vein.
Figure 12.17 Recognition of the accessory
left gastric artery. (A) Celiac arteriogram shows an artery arising from the left hepatic artery just before the umbilical point (arrows). It has a rather undulating course and terminal tortuosity. The right gastric artery arises from the bifurcation point of the proper hepatic artery. (B) Selective left hepatic arteriogram shows ill-defined stain at the end of the artery (black arrow) in the background of small multiple nodular tumor stain in the left hepatic lobe. (C) Selective angiogram obtained using a microcatheter shows esophageal (white arrows) and gastric stain (black arrow). (D) Arterial-phase scan in 2.5-mm collimation demonstrates this small accessory left gastric artery in the fissure for the ligamentum venosum (arrows).
in 47 of 252 autopsies (17.9%). In contrast, Michels2 reported an accessory LGA prevalence of only 3% among 200 anatomic dissections, which suggests the possibility of a lower incidence in the Western population than in Asian populations.
17,19
Because esophageal and gastric mucosa might be adversely
aected by the infusion of therapeutic agents into the hepatic
19,20
ar tery,
it is important to recognize the accessory LGA and dierentiate gastric wall stain of the accessory LGA from a hepatic tumor of the le hepatic lobe.
19
e most common origin of the accessory LGA is the LHA. Occasionally, the accessory LGA can arise from the PHA and, rarely, from the RHA or CHA. It is possible to iden­tify an accessory LGA by analyzing the point of branching, the course of the artery, and the appearance of the periph­eral branches. Branching occurs at the ascending segment of the LHA before the LHA reaches the umbilical point, at which the LHA divides into segmental branches. In the por­tal phase, the accessory LGA does not have an accompany­ing portal vein (Figure 12.16). Peripheral arterial branches around and in the gastric wall have a characteristic coiled appearance. In patients with the accessory LGA, the LGA from the celiac trunk does not have a fundic branch on celiac
arteriography (Figure 12.15). When the accessory LGA is small, it is necessary to perform selective le hepatic arteri­ography or selective angiography of the suspected accessory LGA (Figure12.17). Rarely, the accessory LGA arises from the LHA as a common trunk with the le IPA, mediastinal branch, or bronchial artery.
Hepatic falciformartery
e HFA arises from the middle hepatic artery or LHA as a terminal branch and runs within the hepatic falciform liga­ment with the umbilical vein. e falciform ligament con­sists of a double fold of peritoneum located anterior to the liver, dividing the medial and lateral segments of the le lobe of the liver. With progression of liver cirrhosis, the fal­ciform ligament in front of the liver is shied to the right depending on the degree of atrophy of the right hepatic lobe. erefore, the classic orientation of HFA is the initial short rightward segment before escaping the le intersegmental ssure (sometimes in coiled appearance in anteroposte­rior projection) and long leward and downward segment before reaching the anterior abdominal wall (Figure 12.1,
Figure12.11, and Figure12.14).21 e HFA provides partial
109
Section III:Primary liver cancers
http://internalmedicinebook.com
ABC
Figure 12.18 The hepatic falciform artery anastomosing with superior epigastric artery of the internal mammary artery. (A) Left hepatic arteriogram shows the
falciform artery in its characteristic appearance (arrows). (B) Its selective angiogram using a microcatheter reveals the anastomosis with a superior epigastric vessel (arrows). (C) Embolization was successfully performed by casting the artery with glue (arrows).
AB
Figure 12.19 The left inferior phrenic
artery arising from the accessory left gastric artery as a common trunk. (A) Celiac angiogram shows the origin of a non-hepatic artery from the left hepatic artery (arrows). (B) On selective angiography, it consists of the left inferior phrenic artery (white arrows) and the accessory left gastric artery, producing the gastric fundus stain (black arrows).
blood supply around the umbilicus and communicates with branches of the internal mammary and superior epigastric arteries (Figure12.18).
2,21
e HFA may function as a col-
trunk. e le IPA occasionally arises from the LHA. e le IPAs from the LHA frequently form a common trunk with the
accessory LGA (Figure12.19). lateral pathway to the liver in cases of celiac trunk or hepatic artery occlusion.
e HFA was found in 70% of 200 cadaveric dissections.2 In a prospective study,17 only 62% of the HFA were recognized by celiac arteriography. e remaining cases were identied on superselective le hepatic arteriography. e most common origin of the HFA is segment 4 hepatic artery regardless of the presence of hepatic arterial variation. In no cases did the HFA arise from the segment 2 hepatic artery.
17
e clinical signicance of an angiographically patent HFA is that supraumbilical skin rash may be caused by exposure of the skin to toxic chemicals during chemoembolization or infu­sion chemotherapy through this artery.21 ere is a controversy over whether prophylactic embolization of the HFA is neces­sary. Usually, the long and thick HFA has a greater chance of reaching supraumbilical skin area, and needs to be prophylac­tically embolized. In radioembolization, prophylactic embo­lization is necessary because non-target administration of yttrium-90 microspheres into the HFA will result in a highly localized midabdominal burning sensation for a period of days or weeks. Microcoils or glue can be used for embolization of the HFA (Figure12.18).
Left inferior phrenicartery
e two most common origin sites of the IPAs are the aorta immediately above or adjacent to the celiac trunk and the celiac
Pancreaticoduodenal arteries
e vascular anatomy of the pancreas head and the duodenum is very complex. Several named arteries, including pancreati­coduodenal arcade, dorsal pancreatic artery, supraduodenal or retroduodenal artery, contribute to complex ow dynamics in this region. Adequate bolus injection and proper identica­tion of these vessels may prevent therapy-induced pancreatitis, duodenal ulceration, or perforation.
e pancreaticoduodenal arcades supply the head of the pancreas and the C loop of the duodenum, at least one being anterior and at least one posterior to the head of the pancreas.2 e anterior pancreaticoduodenal arcade is formed by the anterior superior PDA, the smaller of the two end branches of the GDA. e posterior pancreaticoduode­nal arcade is formed by the retroduodenal artery (posterior superior PDA), usually the rst branch of the GDA before or immediately aer it passes behind the duodenum. e two arcades either unite with the SMA via separate inferior PDA given o by the SMA, one for each arcade, or end in a com­mon inferior PDA. e posterior arcades are more cephalad than the anterior arcades.
e pancreaticoduodenal arcades are the most common collateral pathways from the SMA to the celiac branches. Although in most cases both the anterior and posterior arcades developed as collateral pathways between the SMA and the
110
Chapter12:Embolization of livertumors
http://internalmedicinebook.com
AB
CHA, occasionally one arcade developed as a single channel (Figure12.6).
8
e posterior PDA arose from the rst branch of the GDA in 90% of 200 cadevaric dissections, from the RHA in 5%, from the PHA in 4%, and from the artery being replaced by a branch from the dorsal pancreatic artery in 1%.2 In a prospec­tive study,17 the incidence of the posterior superior PDA aris­ing from the PHA or its distal branches was 7%. is condition was particularly prevalent in patients with a variant hepatic
the cystic artery, PDA, and RHA.25 e right and le intrahe­patic bile ducts are surrounded by a vascular plexus supplied from the main RHA and LHA, segmental arteries, GDA, and accessory hepatic arteries. is plexus is closely associated with the arteries supplying the caudate lobe. e caudate lobe and biliary plexus provide collateral connections between the right and le livers.26 Biliary necrosis is a relatively rare occurrence because there lies a rich extrahepatic arterial supply for the bil­iary system.
Figure 12.20 Accessory right hepatic
artery arising from the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal arcade formed between the proper hepatic artery and the superior mesenteric artery. (A) Celiac angiogram shows aberrant origin of the segment 6 hepatic artery from the proper hepatic artery in unusual configuration (arrows). (B) Superior mesenteric arteriogram clearly shows the communicating arcade (arrows) between the aberrant segment 6 hepatic artery and the posterior inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery. Therefore, it can be said that the segment 6 hepatic artery originates from the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal artery.
artery originating from the GDA. Of 13 patients with a vari­ant hepatic artery arising from the GDA, the prevalence of the posterosuperior PDA was 54% (7 of 13). In other words, the posterior pancreaticoduodenal arcade is an important route of hepatic artery variation (Figure12.20).
e supraduodenal artery has been described as a distinctive artery that may arise from the GDA (27%), CHA (20%), LHA (20%), RHA (13%), and cystic arteries (10%).22 Anastomoses with the extrahepatic biliary ductal arterial supply have been described in gross dissection.
23
Cystic artery and biliaryplexus
Based on the cadaveric dissection of 500 specimens, Daseler etal.23 reported an incidence of cystic artery arising from a clas­sic location (RHA arising from the PHA) of 72%, with an inci­dence of accessory or duplicated cystic arteries of 3%. Other origins of the cystic artery include replaced/accessory RHA (18%), LHA (7%), CHA (3%), GDA (1%), and several other unusual origins.24 e cystic artery usually has two branches, a supercial (peritoneal) branch and a deep (non-peritoneal) branch (Figure 12.21).24 It may contribute blood supply to extrahepatic bileducts.
e cystic artery must be identied before transcatheter management of hepatic tumors to prevent or minimize the risks of chemical cholecystitis or ischemic or radiation necro­sis. erefore, catheterization distal to the cystic artery is rec­ommended. Occasionally, the cystic artery may feed the tumor. e superselective catheterization of tumor-feeding arteries from the cystic artery with lack of gallbladder wall staining allows safe delivery of therapeutic agents (Figure12.21).
e blood supply to the biliary tree is via a microscopic peri­biliary plexus that is seldom visualized angiographically. It may enlarge when it supplies the tumor invading the bile ducts or major portal vein (Figure12.22 and Figure12.23). e extra­hepatic bile duct system is supplied by multiple arteries from
24

Extrahepatic collateral arteries

Extrahepatic collateral arteries (EHCs) commonly supply hepatic tumors if the tumors are large or peripherally located, irrespective of the hepatic artery patency (Figure 12.24 and
Figure 12.25).
tration of hepatic tumors can cause adhesion or direct inva­sion into adjacent organs, including the diaphragm, omentum, abdominal wall, gallbladder, stomach, colon, adrenal gland, and kidney, which creates blood supply to the tumors from these organs. Hepatic artery occlusion or attenuation of peripheral hepatic arteries due to repeated transcatheter managements may initiate or exaggerate extrahepatic collateral supply to the tumors (Figure12.26 and Figure12.27).
EHCs include IPAs (Figure 12.24, Figure 12.26, and
Figure12.27), omental branches (Figure12.27), cystic artery
(Figure12.21), internal mammary arteries (IMAs) (Figure12.25 and Figure12.27), intercostal (Figure12.26) or lumbar arter- ies, adrenal arteries, gastric arteries, renal or renal capsular artery (Figure12.26), colic branches from the SMA, and col­lateral vessels from the GDA or PDAs (Figure12.23). IPAs, IMAs, and intercostal arteries communicate with each other and with peripheral hepatic arterial branches through the diaphragm (Figure12.24, Figure12.25, Figure12.26, and
Figure12.27). e right renal capsular artery, middle adrenal
artery, and inferior adrenal artery run through the hepatore­nal ligament and enter the liver.30 e branches of the right and middle colic arteries may enter the liver through adhesion between the liver and colon at the paracolic gutter. e RGA and LGA anastomose with each other and enter the liver via the lesser omentum. e bile duct artery or collaterals from the GDA or PDA run through the hepatoduodenal ligament and enter the liver. e cystic artery may give o a small hep­atic artery branch or communicate with the branch of a hep­atic artery through the deep branch of the cystic artery at the
27,28
Exophytic growth and extracapsular inl-
28,29
4,2738
e
111
Section III:Primary liver cancers
http://internalmedicinebook.com
A B
Figure 12.21 Hepatocellular carcinoma
supplied by deep cystic artery and its selective embolization. (A) Computed tomography scan shows compression or direct invasion of the gallbladder by a tumor (arrows). (B) The common hepatic arteriogram shows hypervascular tumor suspected to be supplied by the hypertrophied cystic artery (arrows). (C) Selective angiography of the cystic artery demonstrates tumor stain exclusively supplied by the deep branch (white arrows). The superficial branch (black arrows) did not contribute to the tumor. (D) Chemoembolization was performed at
DC
the deep branch of the cystic artery.
Figure 12.22 Dilated periportal and
peribiliary collateral network in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma invading the
AB
main portal vein and severe arterioportal shunt. (A) Common hepatic arteriography demonstrates a diffuse tumor in the right hepatic lobe invading the main portal vein and severe arterioportal shunt. Note the hepatofugal opacification of the main portal vein (arrows) and its tributaries. (B) After Gelfoam embolization of the arterioportal shunt, numerous fine arterial networks appeared along the central portal vein and bile ducts, including the hepatoduodenal ligament (arrows). The tributaries of the gastroduodenal artery also contribute to these anastomotic networks.
AB
gallbladder fossa. e omental arteries may enter the liver by adhesion of the omentum to the liver.
Multiple EHCs can supply a tumor (Figure 12.27). Once extrahepatic collateral supply develops, the eective control of the tumors with transcatheter management can be made pos­sible by the proper management of not only the hepatic arterial
112
Figure 12.23 Dilated periportal and
peribiliary collateral vessels along the hepatoduodenal ligament in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma invading the right portal vein and severe arterioportal shunt. (A) Celiac arteriogram demonstrates a diffuse tumor in the right hepatic lobe invading the right portal vein and severe arterioportal shunt. Note the hypertrophied collateral vessel in the hepatoduodenal ligament (arrows) supplied by the dorsal pancreatic artery from the splenic artery. (B) Superior mesenteric arteriogram reveals additional multiple collateral channels supplied by the pancreaticoduodenal artery (arrows).
supply but also extrahepatic collateral supply (Figure12.26).30
31
It is known to be possible to perform chemoembolization through EHCs with high success rates and safety.27 erefore, radiologists should become familiar with the spectrum of EHCs that supply hepatic tumors, the factors that lead to their formation, and their characteristic imaging appearance at CT
Chapter12:Embolization of livertumors
http://internalmedicinebook.com
ABC
Figure 12.24 Large hepatocellular carcinoma supplied by the right inferior phrenic artery at its initial presentation. (A) Helical computed tomography scan in the
arterial phase shows a large hypervascular tumor at the right hepatic lobe abutting the posterior diaphragm. The arrow indicates the right inferior phrenic artery. Its hypertrophy is not remarkable. (B) On celiac arteriography, the celiac trunk and hepatic arteries are widely patent. (C) Right inferior phrenic arteriogram shows its aortic origin and tumor vascularity.
A
C
and conventional angiography to detect them at an early stage. Delivery of therapeutic materials into EHCs should be per­formed with a thorough knowledge of the vascular anatomy and should be performed superselectively with coaxial micro­catheters to avoid complications due to non-target delivery.
How to predict:Suggestive ndings
Because selective angiography of individual collateral vessels is tedious and time-consuming, it is essential to try to deter­mine rst whether or not collateral blood supply is present.27 e initial CT scan provides useful information, and CT signs of direct invasion into adjacent organs or extracapsular inltra­tion indicate the presence of EHCs. Tumors with an exophytic growth pattern are prone to collateral vessel development. It is commonly possible to observe hypertrophied EHCs on CT scan. Nowadays, multidetector CT scan can frequently show tumor-feeding branches from EHCs, particularly from the IMAs and intercostal arteries (Figure 12.25). show the origin of IPA or middle adrenal artery from the
B
D
37,38
It can also
aorta. us, prior to the chemoembolization procedure, care­ful review of multidetector CT scan is essential to determine which EHCs should be interrogated.
Follow-up CT scans are also useful. Aperipheral iodized-oil
27
retention defect within the tumor or delayed development of viable tumor at the peripheral portion of the treated tumor at follow-up CT indicates the presence of EHCs (Figure12.26). In a tumor that recurs aer surgery at the resection margin, the presence of omental collateral vessels should be suspected and investigated. Peripheral local recurrence in a patient with attenuated peripheral hepatic arteries aer repeated chemoem­bolization is frequently supplied by EHC. e correlation of CT and angiographic ndings is essential. If a tumor observed at CT is not demonstrated at hepatic angiography, collateral ves­sels must be investigated.31 When tumor staining on hepatic angiograms has a focal defect or a focal iodized-oil retention defect is noted during hepatic arteriography or iodized-oil infu­sion, alternative feeder vessels are a possibility (Figure12.25). When C-arm CT shows defect of tumor staining supplied by
Figure 12.25 Large hepatocellular
carcinoma abutting the anterosuperior diaphragm supplied by the right internal mammary artery at its initial presentation. (A) Helical computed tomography scan in the arterial phase shows a large hypervascular tumor replacing segments 4 and 8 abutting the anterosuperior diaphragm. The arrow indicates hypertrophied tumor-feeding artery. (B) The right hepatic artery is replaced by the superior mesenteric artery. (C) Common hepatic arteriogram demonstrates a defect of the tumor stain at the superior diaphragmatic aspect (arrows). (D) The defect area is supplied by a phrenic branch (arrows) from the right internal mammary artery.
113
Section III:Primary liver cancers
http://internalmedicinebook.com
AB
CD
EF
Figure 12.26 Hepatocellular carcinoma
exclusively supplied by extrahepatic collateral arteries after repeated sessions of chemoembolization. (A) The patient had multiple nodular tumors (black arrows) at the initial presentation. Note the accessory left gastric artery (white arrows). (B) Five repeated sessions of chemoembolization were performed and all the tumors at the initial presentation showed complete response. During follow-up, a recurrent tumor (arrow) developed at segment 7, abutting the adrenal gland. (C) Celiac arteriogram showed no tumor stain; however, the peripheral hepatic arteries were attenuated. (D) With a suspicion of extrahepatic arterial supply, right inferior phrenic arteriography was performed. The tumor was exclusively supplied by a feeder (black arrow) from the right inferior phrenic artery. The white arrow indicates a feeder for inferior phrenic–pulmonary shunt. (E) On follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan, the treated tumor showed complete response (white arrow). However, another recurrent tumor (black arrow) developed at segment 7 abutting the posterior diaphragm. (F) The tumor was not supplied by the hepatic arteries at all. (G) It was totally supplied by the 11th intercostal artery. Note the hypertrophied feeding artery (arrow) which arises from the intercostal artery at the diaphragmatic attachment site and ascends along the diaphragm to reach the tumor. (H) There was a local progression of the treated tumor at the follow-up CT (not shown) and the residual viable tumor was supplied by the renal capsular artery (arrows) from the right renal artery. (I) The renal capsular artery was selectively catheterized using a microcatheter and chemoembolization was performed. (J) Iodized-oil CT scan taken 2 weeks after the procedure shows compact accumulation of iodized oil in the tumor (arrow).
GH
I J
the hepatic artery, EHCs should be interrogated. Ahypertro­phied omental branch or right IPA may be noted on celiac angiograms (Figure12.27). If the serum alpha-fetoprotein level
is persistently elevated even aer successful devascularization of the hepatic artery, we recommend an investigation of EHCs to theliver.
114
Chapter12:Embolization of livertumors
http://internalmedicinebook.com
AB
C D
EF
Figure 12.27 Cholangiocarcinoma
supplied by multiple left-sided extrahepatic collateral arteries after repeated sessions of chemoembolization. (A–C) Sequential computed tomography scans after four sessions of chemoembolization demonstrate large subcapsular viable tumor at the left lateral segment abutting the left anterior hemidiaphragm at the superior aspect (arrows). (D) Celiac arteriogram shows hypertrophied left gastroepiploic artery (arrows) from the splenic artery. (E) Selective angiogram of the left gastroepiploic artery shows multiple tumor feeders and hypervascular tumor stain in the left hepatic lobe. (F) On inferior phrenic arteriography, part of the upper part of the tumor is supplied by the left inferior phrenic artery (arrows). (G) On left internal mammary arteriography, part of the upper part of the tumor (white arrows) is supplied by a feeder (black arrow).
G
ere is a close relationship between the tumor location
and possible EHCs.
27,31
Tumors located at the posterior sur­face of the right lobe and abutting the diaphragm are most likely to be fed by the right IPA (Figure 12.24). e right intercostal and lumbar arteries usually supply tumor in the lateral and posteroinferior aspect of the right lobe and, when the IPA is attenuated by repeated chemoembolization pro­cedures, reach the territory of the IPA (Figure12.26). Blood supply from the right IMA is seen when the tumor is located beneath the anterior part of the diaphragm or abutting the anterior abdominal wall (Figure 12.25 and Figure 12.27). Tumors located near the right renal fossa are fed by the right
renal capsular artery or adrenal arteries. Tumors located at the anterior surface of the right lobe of the liver or at the lower edge of the right lobe or medial segment of the le liver are fed by the omental or colic arteries. Potential feed­ers for the tumors in the lateral segment of the liver are the le or right gastric arteries, omental arteries from the right or le gastroepiploic arteries, short gastric arteries, and le IPA or IMAs (Figure12.27). e cystic artery mainly feeds tumors located near the gallbladder fossa (Figure12.21), but it infrequently supplies the tumor in the right lobe or medial segment of the liver at a distance from the gallbladder fossa when the hepatic artery is attenuated. Tumors arising in the
115
Section III:Primary liver cancers
http://internalmedicinebook.com
A B
Figure 12.28 Angiographic anatomy of the right inferior phrenic artery. (A) There are multiple tumors (arrowheads) supplied by the right inferior phrenic artery.
Note the typical appearance of the azygoesophageal branch (arrows). (B) Selective angiography shows that the azygoesophageal branch turns at the medial end of the azyoesophageal recess (black arrow) and courses along the lung base (white arrow). Peripheral pulmonary artery (arrowhead) is opacified due to shunt.
caudate lobe tend to be fed by the right IPA, LGA, and pancre­atic arteries. Adjacent EHCs are connected to each other, and their distribution shows individual variation. Transcatheter management of an EHC induces redistribution of blood sup­ply in adjacent collateral arteries.

Anatomy of extrahepatic collateral arteries

Inferior phrenic arteries
ere is a close contact between the liver and the diaphragm, and the blood supply to the diaphragm can reach the liver by direct adherence. e IPA supplies most of the diaphragm, including the area in contact with the bare area of the liver. us, the right IPA is the most common collateral pathway and accounts for almost half of all EHCs. It anastomoses with the adjacent arteries, including the internal mammary, intercostal,
Figure 12.29 Hepatocellular carcinoma in the right liver dome. The tumor
(arrowhead) is supplied by an anteromedial limb (arrows) of the left inferior phrenic artery.
and adrenal arteries.
e right and le IPAs usually originate from the celiac trunk or directly from the aorta as a common trunk or inde­pendent origins (Figure12.1, Figure12.24, and Figure12.27). Less frequently, they arise from the renal arteries (Figure12.26) or, rarely, from the le gastric or hepatic arteries (Figure12.19). With thin-section multidetector CT, its origin and branching pattern can be directly viewed in most cases. When the IPA originates from the celiac axis with median arcuate ligament compression, selective catheterization of the IPA is frequently dicult. In that case, special techniques using a catheter with a large side hole39 or microguide wire loop technique40 are quite useful. Occasionally, the IPA is occluded or severely stenotic and reconstructed via retroperitoneal anastomosis from the adrenal artery, pancreatic arteries from SMA or dorsal pancreatic artery, LGA, or contralateral IPA.41 ese anastomotic pathways can be used to continue transcatheter treatments of the tumors.
e azygoesophageal branch of the right IPA is frequently observed and supplies systemic-to-pulmonary shunt. It usually
arises from the right IPA at the proximal portion of the anterior branch and, coursed medially, undergoes a U-turn at the medial end of azygoesophageal recess, and then courses laterally along the costophrenic angle of the lung base (Figure12.28).
35
e anteromedial limb of the le IPA is the most common tumor-feeding branch and is observed in about half of patients. It usually supplies the tumor in the ventral portion of the right liver dome and can be frequently seen on thin-slice CT scan (Figure12.29).
36
Patients commonly complain of shoulder pain or chest tightness during embolization of the IPA. Transient pleu­ral eusion, basal atelectasis, pulmonary oil embolism, or hemoptysis and diaphragmatic weakness may develop aer the procedure.
30,42
Because the IPA is also a potential source for collateralization to the pulmonary circulation, the pres­ence or absence of IPA–pulmonary shunt should be deter­mined before delivery of therapeutic material into the IPA (Figure12.26D).
116
Chapter12:Embolization of livertumors
http://internalmedicinebook.com
tumors. We found that the phrenic branch is the most com­mon side branch of the IMA supplying hepatic tumors (Figures 12.25D and 12.30).43 It usually arises between the fourth and sixth intercostal spaces and passes through anterior pericardial fat, which can be frequently observed on multi­detector CT scan. Nowadays, we perform selective angiogra­phy of IMA only when tumor-feeding vessels are observed on CTscan.
Cutaneous complications may occur aer chemoemboliza­tion of the IMA. Understanding vascular anatomy of the IMA and selective catheterization of tumor-feeding arteries is a pre­requisite to prevent skin necrosis aer the procedure.
Intercostal and lumbar arteries
Nine pairs of posterior intercostal arteries originate from the dorsal aspect of the thoracic aorta. ey anastomose with the anterior intercostal branches of IMA aer giving o the dor­sal branch, the collateral intercostal branch, and the muscu­lar branch. Lower posterior intercostal arteries anastomose with the IPA at the insertion site of the diaphragm. Ahyper-
Figure 12.30 Angiographic anatomy of the right internal mammary artery in
a patient whose right inferior phrenic artery was previously embolized. At the level of the sixth intercostal space, the internal mammary artery divides into the musculophrenic (short, thick white arrows) and superior epigastric arteries (black arrow). The long descending branch indicated by an open arrow is the pericardiacophrenic artery, which is rarely demonstrated. The phrenic branch (white arrows) arises from the main trunk of the internal mammary artery just above the diaphragm. Among multiple branches of the internal mammary artery, this phrenic branch most commonly supplies hepatic tumors. The musculophrenic artery gives off the paired anterior intercostal arteries (black arrowheads) and the ascending phrenic branches (white arrowheads).
trophied intercostal artery may be observed as a dot-like or linear structure just inferior to the ribs on arterial-phase CT scans.38 Tumors abutting the inferolateral aspect of the dia­phragm are frequently supplied by the posterior intercostal arteries. e intercostal artery always passes the diaphragm insertion site to supply the hepatic tumors, abutting the dia­phragm and making a sharp upward turn near the costochon­dral junction (Figure 12.26G).38 Multidetector CT scan can show a tumor-feeding vessel as an enhancing dot in the upper intercostal space in half of patients. Amicrocatheter should be advanced beyond the diaphragmatic insertion to the tho-
Internal mammary arteries
Angiographic anatomy of the IMA supplying hepatic tumors has been recently investigated in detail (Figure12.30).43 e IMA usually arises from the proximal part of the subclavian artery, opposite the origin of the vertebral artery. e pericar­diacophrenic artery usually arises above the second intercos­tal space and gives branches to the pleura, pericardium, and diaphragm. At the level of the sixth intercostal space, the IMA divides into two end arteries, the musculophrenic and superior epigastric arteries. e musculophrenic artery passes obliquely downward and laterally, behind the seventh, eighth, and ninth costal cartilages. It gives o two anterior intercostal branches to each of the seventh, eighth, and ninth intercostal spaces and vertical diaphragmatic branches, which anastomose with the branches of the IPA. e anterior intercostal arteries and the hypertrophied vertical diaphragmatic branches from the mus­culophrenic artery create a lattice appearance (Figure12.30). e superior epigastric artery passes vertically downward and anastomoses with the inferior epigastric artery. It gives o some branches to the diaphragm, which extend into the fal­ciform ligament of the liver and anastomose with theLHA.
31
In anatomy textbooks, a pericardiacophrenic artery is described that accompanies the phrenic nerve between the pleura and the pericardium. However, according to our expe­rience, it rarely reaches the diaphragm and supplies hepatic
racic cage, where a sharp upward turn is seen, to avoid possible complications such as skin necrosis and spinal infarction.38 e common levels of the intercostal arteries that supply hepatic tumors are T10, T9, and T11, in order of frequency.
38
When the right IPA is obliterated by the previous treat-
ment, the ICAs can supply a tumor at the dome of theliver.
Omental arteries
e omental branch (Figure 12.27) from the gastroepiploic artery (or, in rare cases, from the dorsal pancreatic artery) is the second most common collateral vessel. Omental branches usually are small and branch at an acute angle from the gastro­epiploic artery. When an omental branch supplies a tumor, it becomes suciently dilated to be recognizable at celiac angi­ography.33 erefore, a careful review of celiac angiograms is a rst step toward detecting the omental branch that supplies a hepatic tumor. Because the greater omentum is remarkably mobile, the omental branch can supply a tumor in any intra­peritoneal portion of the liver. In patients with severe liver cirrhosis, the liver shrinks so markedly that an exophytic tumor in the liver dome surrounded by the omentum can be supplied by an omental branch with a very long path.27 ese omental branches arise from the right and le gastroepiploic arteries (Figure 12.27). e le gastroepiploic artery arises from the distal splenic artery. Omental branches from the le
117
Section III:Primary liver cancers
http://internalmedicinebook.com
gastroepiploic artery frequently supply an exophytic tumor at the dome of the right hepaticlobe.
Adrenal arteries
If a tumor extends inferomedially, adrenal arteries can sup­ply the tumor. e adrenal gland has three sources of arterial supply:a superior adrenal artery that arises from the IPA, a middle adrenal artery that arises from the lateral aspect of the aorta at a level between the celiac and renal arteries, and an inferior adrenal artery that arises from the superior aspect of the ipsilateral renal artery. Normal adrenal gland staining is triangular. On inferior phrenic angiograms, superior adrenal artery and normal adrenal gland staining are usually observed. erefore, normal adrenal gland staining must not be confused with tumor staining on inferior phrenic angiograms.
Renal and renal capsular arteries
If a tumor extends posteroinferiorly, it may be fed by the renal and renal capsular arteries (Figure12.26). e superior cap­sular artery usually arises together with the inferior adrenal artery from the renal artery and follows a characteristic tor­tuous path over the superior pole of the kidney. Perforating capsular arteries arise from arcuate and interlobular arteries, which may supply the tumor in contact with the kidney.
vessels, and embolization of the cystic artery may cause chol­ecystitis or gallbladder infarction.45 Chemoembolization of the IPA may result in shoulder pain, pleural eusion, basal atelec­tasis, pulmonary embolization, or diaphragmatic weakness.
30
To avoid these complications, selective catheterization should be achieved by placing the catheter tip as close as pos­sible to the specic branch or branches supplying a neoplasm. Second, embolic materials should be infused incrementally to prevent them from reuxing into a non-target branch. ird, coils and gelatin-sponge particles may be used to occlude and protect the territory of the normal distal branches before chem­oembolization. Fourth, to reduce pain, it is recommended that a small amount of 1% lidocaine be injected intra-arterially dur­ing embolization.
27
Because terminal branches of adjacent EHCs are anastomo­sed to each other, multiple EHCs can supply one tumor. If an EHC is proximally embolized or is complicated by an arterial spasm during catheterization or if there is a local recurrence aer chemoembolization of an EHC, adjacent vessels can take over its territory. For example, a recurrent tumor previously supplied via the IPA may be supplied by the intercostal or IMA at a subsequent chemoembolization session. It is important to catheterize EHCs by using a meticulous technique with micro­catheters to prevent spasm or arterial injury and to investigate the presence or absence of collateral circulation from adjacent vessels. In advanced stages of hepatic tumors, chemoemboliza-
Gastric arteries
When a hepatic tumor has broad contact with the stomach, gastric arteries can supply the tumor. e LGA usually arises from the celiac trunk and infrequently from the supraceliac aorta. e RGA commonly arises from the PHA and LHA and infrequently arises from the GDA and CHA. Short gastric arteries arise from the splenic artery and supply the gastric fun­dus. Normal stomach stain can oen mimic tumorstain.
Colic branches
When an exophytic tumor is located in the inferior tip of the right hepatic lobe, the hepatic exure of the colon can be in close contact with the tumor. Abranch of the SMA, particu­larly the right or middle colic branch, may supply the tumor under these conditions. Because a colic branch supplying the tumor generally traverses the antimesenteric border of the colon, it is safe to infuse chemotherapeutic agents beyond the antimesenteric border.
44
Transcatheter management of extrahepatic collateral arteries
When EHCs are chemoembolized, there is a risk of emboliz­ing non-target branches, which can lead to a variety of com­plications, depending on location.45 Cutaneous problems, such as itching, erythema, and necrosis, may arise when the internal mammary, intercostal, or lumbar artery is embolized. Gastrointestinal erosion, ulceration, or perforation can be caused by gastric, omental, and colic branch artery emboliza­tion. Paraplegia may result from the inadvertent embolization of spinal branches arising from intercostal or lumbar collateral
tion through EHCs may not improve tumor control, because it is extremely dicult to embolize multiple feeder vessels from hepatic arteries and EHCs eectively.
27

References

1. Williams PL, Warwick R. Gray’s Anatomy, 36th edn.
Philadelphia:Saunders,1980.
2. Michels NA. Blood Supply and Anatomy of the Upper Abdominal
Organs. Philadelphia:JB Lippincott, 1955; pp. 152–154, 256–259, 374–375.
3. Song SY, Chung JW, Yin YH, etal. Celiac axis and common
hepatic artery variations in 5002 patients:Systematic analysis with spiral CT and DSA. Radiology 2010; 255:278–288.
4. Soo CS, Chuang VP, Wallace S, etal. Treatment of hepatic
neoplasm through extrahepatic collaterals. Radiology 1983; 144:485–494.
5. Bron KM, Redman HC. Splanchnic artery stenosis and
occlusion:Incidence, arteriographic and clinical manifestations. Radiology 1969; 92:323–328.
6. David CL, Harold AB. High incidence of celiac axis narrowing
in asymptomatic individuals. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1972; 116:426–429.
7. Park CM, Chung JW, Kim HB, etal. Celiac axis
stenosis:Incidence and etiologies in asymptomatic individuals. Korean J Radiol 2001; 2:8–13.
8. Song SY, Chung JW, Kwon JW, etal. Collateral pathways in
patients with celiac axis stenosis:Angiographic-spiral CT correlation. Radiographics 2002; 22:881–893.
9. Kwon JW, Chung JW, Song SY, etal. Transcatheter arterial
chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with celiac axis occlusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13:689–694.
118