Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_740_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
50 Мб
Скачать
144
A. D. Schroeder and C. J. Filipi
– Oral antibiotics for routine hydroceles may
be initiated at the discretion of the surgeon, and if lariasis is suspected, treatment should be initiated.
– If a drain is left, the surgeon should change
the dressing on the rst postoperative day and decide about removing it. If the drain is not removed, the patient should be fol­lowed daily until it is. After drain removal the patient should be seen by an in-country surgeon.
15.3.3 Adult Giant Scrotal Hernias andLarge Inguinal Scrotal Hernias
Giant inguinal scrotal hernias are highly morbid and are dened as hernias extending below the midpoint of the inner thigh with the patient stand­ing [20] and an anteroposterior diameter of at least 30cm and a laterolateral diameter of 50cm or more [21] (Fig.15.11). They are more com­mon in developing countries because pediatric
hernia repair is dangerous or unavailable, and a safe adult repair is almost impossible without an effective intensive care unit. Campanelli et al. describe a successful but sophisticated operative approach that necessitates HIC resources [20]. Alarge lower pararectus incision extending into the groin is made; full reduction of the hernia sac contents into the abdominal cavity using the “hug technique” is used; resection of bowel may be necessary; and a 30×30cm piece of retroperito­neal mesh is xed with brin glue. The patient is ventilated for 1day and then extubated and sup­ported by intensive respiratory therapy. Giant scrotal hernias are highly morbid and are cur­rently out of the HRFU purview.
Large inguinal scrotal hernias also are morbid and cause sexual dysfunction, chronic pain and present a higher risk of incarceration and stran­gulation. These hernias can be repaired in an aus­tere environment, but a thorough preoperative medical evaluation, an experienced anesthesiolo­gist, and careful dissection and hemostasis are necessary. An overnight stay may be appropriate, and surgeon postoperative follow-up is neces­sary. A scrotal support during the rst postopera­tive week is advisable.
Fig. 15.11 Giant scrotal hernia
15.3.4 Pediatric Hernia Repair
andUndescended Testicle
Dr. Robert Cusick, an Omaha-based pediatric sur­geon (Fig.15.12), established a level of excellence within our organization, and other pediatric sur­geons including Dr. David Partrick (Fig. 15.13) have sustained that expectation. Dr. Cusick is an ofcer in the American Pediatric Surgical Association, and through his network of col­leagues, we have been able to reliably recruit excellent pediatric surgeons. We have had to avoid hernia repair on children under the age of 6months because hospitalization is not possible in most of our sites. All hernia repairs are done on an outpa­tient basis, and therefore, one child with a large omphalocele-related fascial defect and hernia was referred to an in-country pediatric surgeon. Patients with congenital undescended testicles that are intracanalicular or supra-scrotal are operated
15 Humanitarian Hernia Surgery: Lessons Learned
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
145
Fig. 15.12 A Dominican Republic patient with Dr.
Cusick
upon, and there have been no related complica­tions. A pediatrician’s preoperative examination and early postoperative support and a pediatric anesthesiologist are other important elements to a successful children’s program, and in most cir­cumstances, we were able to provide that support.
15.3.5 Incisional Hernias
Incisional hernias are a common complication after abdominal surgery with the incidence after laparotomy estimated at 10–15% [22]. In LMICs, gynecologic procedures are frequently performed
Fig. 15.13 An Ecuadorian patient with Dr. Partrick
23], and large incisional hernias will result.
[ Surgical repair can be complex with prolonged postoperative in-hospital care, and complications can be catastrophic requiring multiple opera­tions, mechanical ventilation, and a prolonged ICU stay. Even in HIC hernia centers of excel­lence, postoperative complications range from 10 to 48% [
24]. In a retrospective analysis from
Nigeria, large ventral hernia repair was associ­ated with 25.6% morbidity rate and a 4.9% mor­tality rate [25]. Another report from Nigeria recorded a wound infection rate of 31.6%, wound dehiscence rate of 21.1%, and overall mortality of 4.8% [23]. Even clinically small incisional hernias can intraoperatively reveal multiple fascial defects [26], necessitating a large incision, signicant surgical expertise, and extended post­operative care. Previously at all facilities partner­ing with HRFU, high-quality postoperative care was not available. A new hospital in Port-au­Prince, Haiti, is now, however, making it possible
146
A. D. Schroeder and C. J. Filipi
to safely perform incisional herniorrhaphy on select patients.
15.3.6 Anesthesia Care
There is a dramatic disparity in anesthesia-related complications and deaths when comparing out­comes in HICs with those in LMICs. Anesthesia care has signicantly improved in HICs since 1970 with an estimated 40-fold decrease in over­all mortality to approximately one death in 200,000 anesthetics [27]. Similarly, the rate of anesthesia-related cardiac arrests decreased threefold within the last 30years [28]. Data from LMICs is limited, but anesthesia-related mortal­ity rates are estimated to be vefold higher [29] and in individual reports up to 60-fold higher than in HICs [27]. High anesthesia-related mor­tality rates in LMICs are especially prevalent in the pediatric population. A recent systematic review by Gonzalez et al. found signicantly lower anesthesia-related mortality rates in HICs (0.0–0.69 per 10,000) than in low-income coun­tries (2.4–3.3 per 10,000) [30]. However, there is considerable variability in quality of anesthesia at different LIC sites. One report from West Africa reported a pediatric anesthesia-related mortality rate of 97 per 10,000 anesthetics [31]. It is apparent that surgical outreach missions have to pay special attention to the availability of well­trained anesthesia staff, adequate equipment, medications/anesthetic agents, hemodynamic monitoring, and pulse oximetry. An experienced pediatric anesthesiologist is vital to the success of any mission that operates upon children.
documentation methods, and costs associated with cell phones and absence of internet service.
Torchia et al. report a follow-up concept for orthopedic surgery missions which involves a Peruvian physician, who performs four follow-up consultations within 12 months postoperatively [33]. An incentive structure with a graduated payment plan was created for the physician. With this method, consistent follow-up was achieved in 82% of patients. Lati etal. described utiliza­tion of an online database for preoperative assess­ments prior to surgical mission trips to the Philippines [34]. Preoperative consultations can be documented by a mission team member or local physician and uploaded to an online server allowing for remote clinical decision-making. This concept could also be applied to postopera­tive evaluations.
Hernia Repair for the Underserved trained 120 health-care promoters to provide hernia patient follow-up in the Dominican Republic. Health­care promoters are volunteers that are elected by their local community and are educated on basic health-care issues at the ILAC center. The pro­gram is 35 years old and highly respected by patients and the Ministry of Health. The volun­teers see patients independently, consult with their coordinator who may take a cell phone pic­ture of the incision and send it to Dr. Filipi. If necessary a local surgeon, trained by HRFU, then sees the patient. In other countries pictures are sent to Dr. Filipi, and a referral is arranged with a pre-identied local surgeon. Our organization has not had sufcient funding to pay local pro­viders for systematic follow-up as mentioned above, although it is one of HRFU’s goals.
15.3.7 Patient Follow-Up
A common pitfall of surgical outreach missions is lack of systematic follow-up. Shrime et al. identied temporary short-term platforms as being prone to inconsistent follow-up [32]. Other reasons for low follow-up rates include lack of local medical staff involvement, patient transpor­tation costs, local staff and patient misunder­standing about the value of follow-up, unreliable
15.4 Training Missions
15.4.1 Capacity Building
Capacity building is dened by the United Nations as developing a “country’s human, sci­entic, technological, organizational, institu­tional and resource capabilities … based on an understanding of environmental potentials, lim­its and of needs perceived by the people of the
15 Humanitarian Hernia Surgery: Lessons Learned
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
country concerned” [35, 36]. For global surgery, education is a recognized priority for capacity building. Beard etal. mention that a systematic teaching program for mesh hernia repair tech­niques would add greater sustainability to surgi­cal outreach programs [11]. Hernia Repair for the Underserved developed a surgical training program for tension-free mesh repair with the goal of local community self-sustainability within 5years.
147
15.4.2 Training Method
Fully trained surgeons are chosen for training, on condition that they use donated mesh for poor patients only and that a mesh patient spreadsheet is sent to the HRFU education coor­dinator before more mesh is provided. Six to seven nonrecurrent, non-scrotal inguinal hernias are chosen for training purposes during the 1-day course. The trainer uses a validated surgi­cal technique rating form (the Operative Performance Rating Scale (OPRS)) designed by the University of Southern Illinois surgical department education division with the help of Dr. John Mellinger and input from Dr. Parviz Amid, Dr. David Chen of the UCLA department of surgery, and Dr. Filipi of Creighton University. The OPRS basic method is approved by the American Board of Surgeons for resident training.
Before the rst operation, the rating form is reviewed with the trainee, and then the trainer performs the rst operation, and the trainee rst assists. The trainee (Fig. 15.14) and trainer reverse their roles with the following 4–6 opera­tions. After each operation the trainer lls out the rating form in privacy (Fig. 15.15) and then immediately reviews it with the trainee giving him a numerical score and explanation for all of the operative step ratings (Fig.15.16). All train­ing operations are performed the same day, and the OPRS feedback is completed after each oper­ation. If the trainee achieves satisfactory scores, they are given a certicate of participation and 20 pieces of donated mesh. Photographs 15.14,
15.15, 15.16 show the process.
Fig. 15.14 The trainee giving local anesthesia
Fig. 15.15 The trainer lling out the form
15.4.3 Hernia Mesh inDeveloping Countries
Since HRFU started hernia trips in 2004, we have always had an abundance of high-quality polypro­pylene mesh. C.R. Bard, Ethicon, Covidien, and Winer from Columbia have been most generous. There is now more red tape with some manufac­turers, but the supply continues. We have always
148
A. D. Schroeder and C. J. Filipi
coordinator that understands the requirements for effective education and cultural barriers is essen­tial, but even with that, there is the unexpected. The trained surgeon has to continue performing elective hernia surgery, but doctor strikes, natural disasters, government dysfunction, and many other barriers abound. The trained surgeon has to be motivated to keep learning, but in austere cir­cumstances, their family may not have enough food, so despite a passion for learning, economic necessities pervade, and rather than perform charity hernia operations, the surgeon has to pro­mote a private pay practice and take emergency room call. The list of barriers is endless, but most important are the trainees ability, their previous training, and their loyalty to the in-country coor­dinator. Good trainee support and selection can with time allow trainees to become a trainer— which provides overall sustainability of the edu­cation initiative.
Fig. 15.16 Discussing the OPRS form after an
operation
been able to supply mesh when the surgeon requests it. Unexpired mesh is used, although at the beginning we did on occasion use mesh that was within 2years of expiration if the packaging was intact. Now we have more mesh, and compa­nies are beginning to locate manufacturing sites in HMICs with the intent to provide more affordable mesh. As the companies see the market expand due to surgeon and hospital request, and increased competition occurs from in-country companies using well-regulated manufacturing and steriliza­tion standards, the Lichtenstein repair and other mesh operations, including ventral hernia opera­tions, will eventually become commonplace. Well-conceived training is necessary, however, for tissue repair surgeons to make the transition to mesh.
15.4.4 Surgeon Trainee Selection
Trainee selection is critical to the success of any educational program. A trusted in-country
15.4.5 Additional Barriers toEducation Assessment andSustainability
In our experience surgeon trainee follow-up has been plagued by communication difculties and cultural/economic disparities. Although most trainee surgeons have cell phones and an e-mail address, many do not have affordable internet, consistent internet, and or a working computer. Surgeon annual incomes are such that computer repair or a new purchase is often not possible. Cell phone communication may be difcult because there can be a more pronounced lan­guage barrier on the phone. Some surgeons do not fully understand the reason for follow-up and the information we are seeking. Additionally, the problem is conceptual. In Haiti, for instance, it is extremely difcult to obtain reports especially from the public sector. Surgeons follow this trend and do not feel compelled by education or instinct to ll out a spreadsheet, especially if it is for a foreign program. The other developing country vagaries of life notwithstanding, postgraduate education, and the added responsibilities are a professional luxury that is rarely experienced and
15 Humanitarian Hernia Surgery: Lessons Learned
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
149
unfamiliar, plus the program is relatively new, and some surgeons do not feel adherent. We are trying to better understand the individual follow­up issues and improve trainee follow-up by reminders and in person visits. To do so, we now have a multilingual United States-based surgeon education coordinator.
Trainee follow-up is more likely but there are still issues; the language barrier is lower but not always conquered, and the culture of account­ability is often foreign in LICs and LMICs. Corruption and the spoils system is alive and well in many developing countries, and honest inter­changes, especially when money is involved, are only possible if the in-country organizational infrastructure is reliable. We provide mesh to the trainee surgeon for use in poor patients only, but follow-up communication and mesh use has occurred with only 50% of our trainees. This is not because the trainees are disingenuous but because we, as an organization, after 5years of training, need to understand how best to select, monitor, and help our trainees to perform elective hernia operations on a regular basis.
Therefore, periodic coordinator assessments of the surgeons’ ability to perform elective surgery are necessary. An in-person visit is, however, expensive. Nonprots often live on the ragged edge of solvency, and balancing nancial priori­ties is always a challenge. If there is to be dedica­tion to in-country training and capacity building, the best method appears to be that implemented by Torchia et al. [34]. In addition to paying the United States coordinator expenses, improving the surgeon’s capacity to perform elective surgery by paying for or obtaining needed new equip­ment, and possibly supplementing the surgeon’s salary, with accountability systems in place may help the surgeon, his prospective patients, and the country at large. It is our organizational goal to mature this approach and learn further lessons to enable our trainee surgeon partners.
Conclusion
Lessons learned for service missions:
1. Without compromise adhere to the prefer­ential option for the poor.
2. Have an organizational zero tolerance for patient mortality.
3. Recruit and screen true expert hernia surgeons.
4. Use pediatric surgeons for children under
16.
5. Recruit expert anesthesiologists.
6. Use pediatric anesthesiologists for children.
7. Recruit experienced dedicated nurses and sterilization staff.
8. Team leaders should be experienced her­nia surgeons with leadership skills.
9. Utilize proven surgical techniques and high-quality equipment.
10. Operate selectively on large hydroceles and giant scrotal hernias.
11. Avoid incisional hernias when starting.
12. Avoid large or complicated incisional hernias.
13. Utilize well-trained local staff for follow-up.
Lessons learned for training missions:
1. Recruit a multilingual surgeon education coordinator.
2. Determine if potential surgeon trainees per­form >20 elective operations a month.
3. Train surgeons utilizing OPRS and lectures for 2days rather than 1.
4. Establish systematized patient and surgeon follow-up.
5. Train candidates to train other local surgeons.
The HRFU elective morbidity and mortal­ity rates are consistent with outcomes from HICs and conrm the feasibility of a public health initiative based on the principles of the preferential option for the poor. The model is reproducible and can benet many.
Acknowledgment Disclosures: ADS has nothing to dis- close. CJF declares conict of interest related to the sub­mitted work (equipment and/or monetary donations to 501(c)3 non-prot organization Hernia Repair for the Underserved (HRFU) by Covidien, C.R. Bard, Ethicon, Cook, and Winer. CJF is the HRFU founder and board member.
150
A. D. Schroeder and C. J. Filipi
References
1. Farmer PE, Kim JY. Surgery and global health: a view from beyond the OR.World J Surg. 2008;32: 533–6.
2. Bickler SW, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N, et al. Global burden of surgical conditions. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN, editors. Essential surgery. 3rd ed. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2015. p.19–40.
3. Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL.Long-term result and cur­rent status of the Lichtenstein open tension-free her­nioplasty. Hernia. 1998;2(2):89–94.
4. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Anaesthesia and post­operative morbidity after elective groin hernia repair: a nation-wide study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(2):169–74.
5. Majholm B, Engbæk J, Bartholdy J, et al. Is day surgery safe? A Danish multicenter study of mor­bidity after 57,709 day surgery procedures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(3):323–31.
6. Mabula JB, Chalya PL. Surgical management of inguinal hernias at Bugando Medical Centre in north­western Tanzania: our experiences in a resource-lim­ited setting. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:585.
7. Harouna Y, Yaya H, Abdou I, Bazira L.Prognosis of strangulated inguinal hernia in the adult: inuence of intestinal necrosis. Apropos of 34 cases. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2000;93(5):317–20.
8. Carlsen CG, Lindorff-Larsen K, Funch-Jensen P, etal. Is current surgical training efcient? A national survey. J Surg Educ. 2014;71(3):367–74.
9. Carlsen CG, Lindorff-Larsen K, Funch-Jensen P, et al. Reliable and valid assessment of Lichtenstein hernia repair skills. Hernia. 2013;18(4):543–8.
10. Kim MJ, Williams RG, Boehler ML. Rening the evaluation of operating room performance. J Surg Educ. 2009;66(6):352–6.
11. Beard JH, Ohene-Yeboah M, de Vries CR, etal. Hernia and hydrocele. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN, editors. Essential surgery. 3rd ed. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank;
2015. p.151–71.
12. Ericsson KA.Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988–94.
13. Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guide­lines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18(2):151–63.
14. Soerensen CG, Rosenberg J. The use of sterilized mosquito nets for hernioplasty: a systematic review. Hernia. 2012;16:621–5.
15. Loefgren J, Nordin P, Ibingira C, etal. A randomized trial of low-cost mesh in groin hernia repair. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:146–53.
16. Manganiello M, Hughes CD, Hagander L.Urologic disease in a resource-poor country. World J Surg. 2013;37:344–8.
17. Mante SD, Gueye SM.Capacity building for the mod­ied larial hydrocelectomy technique in West Africa. Acta Trop. 2011;120(Suppl 1):S76–80.
18. http://www.dcp-3.org/sites/default/files/chapters/
V9C9BEARD_091013.pdf
19. Merseburger AS, Kuczyk MA, Moul JW.Urology at a glance. NewYork: Springer; 2014.
20. Hodgkinson DJ, McIlrath DC. Scrotal reconstruc­tion for giant inguinal hernias. Surg Clin N Am. 1984;64:301–13.
21. Cavalli M, Biondi A, Bruni PG, et al. Giant ingui­nal hernia: the challenging hug technique. Hernia. 2015;19(5):775–83.
22. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K.Hernias: inguinal and inci­sional. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1561–71.
23. Ezeome ER, Nwajiobi CE.Challenges in the repair of large abdominal wall hernias in Nigeria: review of available options in resource limited environments. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13(2):167–72.
24. Helgstrand F. National results after ventral hernia repair. Dan Med J. 2016;63(7):B5258.
25. Osifo OD, Efobi AC. Challenges of giant ven­tral hernia repair in children in an African tertiary care center with limited resources. Hernia. 2009; 13(2):143–7.
26. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F.Classication of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14.
27. Schlack SS, Boermeester MA. Patient safety dur­ing anaesthesia: incorporation of the WHO safe surgery guidelines into clinical practice. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2010;23:754–8.
28. Koga FA, El Dib R, Wakasugui W.Anesthesia-related and perioperative cardiac arrest in low- and high­income countries: a systematic review with meta­regression and proportional meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(36):e1465.
29. Mock CN, Donkor P, Gawande A, et al. Essential surgery: key messages of this volume. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN, editors. Essential surgery. 3rd ed. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2015. p.1–18.
30. Gonzalez LP, Pignaton W, Kusano PS, et al. Anesthesia-related mortality in pediatric patients: a systematic review. Clinics. 2012;67(4):381–7.
31. Zoumenou E, Gbenou S, Assouto P.Pediatric anes­thesia in developing countries: experience in the two main university hospitals of Benin in West Africa. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(8):741–7.
15 Humanitarian Hernia Surgery: Lessons Learned
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
151
32. Shrime MG, Sleemi A, Ravilla TD. Charitable platforms in global surgery: a systematic review of their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, sustain­ability, and role training. World J Surg. 2015;39: 10–20.
33. Torchia MT, Schroder LK, Hill BW.A patient fol­low-up program for short-term surgical mission trips to a developing country. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(3):226–32.
34. Lati R, Mora F, Bekteshi F, etal. Preoperative tele­medicine evaluation of surgical mission patients:
should we use it routinely? Bull Am Coll Surg. 2014;99(1):17–23.
35. United Nations; Committee of Experts on Public Administration. United Nations Economic and Social Council Denition of basic concepts and terminolo­gies in governance and public administration. 2006.
36. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992 (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.93.I.18 and corrigenda), vol 1: Resolutions adopted by the Conference. 1992; resolution 1, annex II.
The Most Important Clinical Trial intheLast 10 Years inInguinal andIncisional Hernia Surgery
LarsNannestadJorgensen andThueBisgaard
16
Accumulation of scientic evidence is fast, and the number of publications within hernia-related topics increases exponentially. A simple search on PubMed reveals that the number of publications applying the search time hernia increased by 100% comparing two 4-year periods (2000–2003, n=1590, and 2013–2016, n=3228). In addition, there is an explosion of alternative non-indexed publications appearing in electronic journals, con­gress abstracts, search machines, and social media. Therefore, it is challenging for the scien­tically active surgeons to keep up with the rapid stream of new data and to implement evidence­based changes into surgical practice. Apart from a long time lap between initiation of a randomized controlled trial and nal publication, considerable time is associated with implementation of the study results into clinical practice. While some promising study conclusions based on rm meth­odology may remain clinically unnoticed, others are simply ignored due to conservatism. Therefore, only a minority of studies lead to signicant breakthroughs and change of clinical practice.
Given these conditions, it is challenging—if
not impossible—to identify the most important
L. N. Jorgensen (*) Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
T. Bisgaard Gastrounit, Surgical Division, Centre of Surgical Research, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
clinical studies on inguinal and incisional hernia repair. We were assigned to point out two of the most important clinical trials in groin and inci­sional hernia surgery during the recent 10years. In our search, we aimed to identify papers of exceptional originality and creativity. The study results should have outstanding clinical implica­tions for a large group of patients and the poten­tial to signicantly improve surgical practice. Finally, adoption of the study conclusions should signicantly impact positively on cost-effective­ness. Our selection criteria were not restricted to papers, which were published in high-impact sci­entic journals or had an optimal scientic study design. Each of us independently selected ve potential papers from each of the two categories. Selection of the nal two papers was obtained after consensus.
Groin Hernia Surgery: Löfgren J, Nordin P, Ibingira C, Matovu A, Galiwango E, Wladis A.A randomized trial of low-cost mesh in groin hernia repair. N Engl J Med 2016;374:146–53.
There is an annual number of approximately 20million groin hernia repairs. Even though they are considered safe and cost-effective in the industrialized world, there are limiting factors for groin hernia surgery in the third world including restricted health economy, relatively high proce­dural costs, limited access to hospital facilities, and low availability of surgeons. Moreover, patients are often expected to pay for their own medical care. These resource constraints result in a considerable rate of nonoperated patients with
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 G. Campanelli (ed.), The Art of Hernia Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72626-7_16
153
154
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
L. N. Jorgensen and T. Bisgaard
irreducible large inguinoscrotal hernias and ulti­mately fatal cases due to hernia strangulation. In this setting, there is a great need to dene and evaluate a safe low-cost procedure for groin her­nia repair.
The use of inexpensive mosquito net made of high-porosity polyethylene as an alternative to commercially available mesh materials has reduced costs associated with groin hernia repair in some places outside the industrialized world [1, 2]. However, no randomized comparison against conventional mesh products had been undertaken until a group consisting of surgeons from Sweden and Uganda recently published the results from a double-blind randomized con­trolled trial conducted in Uganda [3]. Patients with a primary unilateral inguinal groin were recruited in several villages. Following informed consent, 302 patients underwent Lichtenstein repair under local inltration analgesia by one of four surgeons. Patients were evenly randomly allocated under surgery to receive either a mos­quito mesh made of polyethylene (38g/m2, pore size 1.5mm, prize US$ 1) or a commercial poly­propylene mesh (Parietene Light, Covidien,
53.7 g/m2, pore size 1.9 mm, price US$ 125). Scrub nurses performed the preparation and ster­ilization of the mosquito mesh material following a simple guideline.
Astonishing high rates of clinical follow-up were achieved at 14 days (97%) and 1 year (94%). The 14-day incidence of all postoperative complications was 30% with no signicant dif­ferences between the allocation arms. Most com­mon were wound complications, none of which required removal of the mesh. There was only one patient (0.7%) with a hernia recurrence at 1year postoperative in the low-cost mesh group. All patients reported signicant improvement of groin symptoms (Inguinal Pain Questionnaire), self-assessed health and satisfaction at 1 year compared to the preoperative assessment, whereas these parameters did not signicantly depend on the mesh randomization.
The authors are to be congratulated for per­forming this extremely relevant study and obtain high follow-up rates under relatively challenging East African rural conditions. This study has high
potential impact on health services in areas where the cost of a commercially available mesh is pro­hibitive for groin hernia repair. The RCT demon­strated the safety of implanting mosquito net as a synthetic prosthesis in Lichtenstein repair given that skilled staff is present to conduct the prepa­ration, packing, and sterilization of the material.
Incisional Hernia Surgery: Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 2009;144:1056–9.
Incisional hernia develops in up to 29% of patients undergoing a laparotomy [4]. Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs in nearly one of ve laparotomies and increases the risk of incisional hernia formation [5, 6]. The annual number of incisional hernia repairs is 300,000in Europe [7], and the associated cost per patient is between 9000 and 12,000 € [8] leading to an approximate three billion € in total costs. Incisional hernias are associated with discomfort, pain, risk of strangulation, increased sick leave, and reduced quality of life including impaired cosmesis. Moreover, incisional hernia repair is often com­plex with a considerable risk of postoperative complications and repetitive surgery because of hernia recurrence. There is thus a great need for effective and easily applied preventive measures to reduce the hernia rate, as even minor rate reductions are accompanied by health-care cost benets [8]. Lately, prophylactic meshes for abdominal wound closure have proven effective for the prevention of incisional hernia in high­risk patients [9]. However, there are more simple measures to reduce the risk of hernia formation such as adopting a ratio of at least 4 to 1 for the length of used suture relative to the length of the wound [10]. Importantly, a 4 to 1 ratio could be obtained in different ways: large suture bites and gaps between each stich or small suture bites in combination with small inter-stich gaps.
Dr. Israelsson’s group from Sweden that origi­nally proposed the 4 to 1 ratio for abdominal wound closure sets out to investigate how to obtain this ratio in the most efcient manner. Impressively, they conducted such a study in their own center during a 5-year period randomizing 737 patients