Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_20_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Self‐Study Answers
1. High caries risk
2. The radiographic exam should be individualized
per patient; however, if the posterior teeth are in
contact, the patient should receive selected
periapical/occlusal views and/or bitewing radiographs
3. The tell‐show‐do technique involves explanation,
demonstration, and completion of a step
Bibliography
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2018–2019a.
Prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and individuals with special health care needs. In:
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Best Practices (Reference
Manual). Pediatr Dent 40:213–15. https://www.aapd.org/
research/oral‐health‐policies‐‐recommendations/prescribing‐
dental‐radiographs‐for‐infants‐children‐adolescents‐and‐
individuals‐with‐special‐health‐care‐needs
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2018–2019b.
Management of the developing dentition and occlusion in
pediatric dentistry. In: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Best
Practices (Reference Manual). Pediatr Dent 40:352–65.
https://www.aapd.org/research/oral‐health‐policies‐‐
recommendations/management‐of‐the‐developing‐
dentition‐occlusion‐in‐pediatric‐dentistry
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. Pediatric
restorative dentistry consensus conference. Pediatr Dent
24(5):374–6.
4. 2.26% fluoride ion
5. Local anesthesia may not be necessary in small
class V restorations; nevertheless, some form of
local anesthesia may be necessary for rubber dam
placement
Berg J. 1998. The continuum of restorative materials in pediat-
ric dentistry – a review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent
20(2):93–100.
Donly KJ, Garcia‐Godoy F. 2015. The use of resin‐based com-
posite in children: an update. Pediatr Dent 37(2):136–43.
Featherstone JDB. 2006. Caries prevention and reversal based
on the caries balance. Pediatr Dent 28(2):128–31.
Malamed S. 2000. Medical Emergencies in the Dental Office,
5th edition. Maryland Heights: Mosby.
Quock RL, Barros JA, Yang SW, Patel SA. 2012. Effect of silver
diamine fluoride on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
Oper Dent 37(6):610–16.
Soxman JA. 2005. Preventive guidelines for the preschool
patient. Gen Dent 53(1):77–80.
Waggoner WF, Nelson T. 2019. Restorative dentistry for the pri-
mary dentition. In: Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy through
Adolescence, 6th edition. Nowak A, etal. (eds). Philadelphia:
Elsevier.
Waggoner WF. 2015. Restoring primary anterior teeth: update
for 2014. Pediatr Dent 37(2):163–70.
60 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Case 6
https://t.me/medicina_free
Class IV Resin
BA
Figure 2.6.1 (A, B) Facial photographs.
A. Presenting Patient
• Eleven‐year‐, eleven‐month‐old male (Figure 2.6.1)
• Trauma follow‐up visit
B. Chief Complaint
• Mother states, “My son chipped his front tooth while
skateboarding over a year ago. This tooth has never
bothered him”
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 1
History foraHeart Murmur
• Obtain a thorough understanding of the status
of the heart murmur
• Question on:
Documentation of heart murmur status
Follow‐up evaluations of heart murmur
Any consults to a pediatric cardiologist
Any need for echocardiograms or chest films
Any symptoms experienced by the patient
Any medications that patient takes for this
condition
Any need for antibiotic prophylaxis for
subacute bacterial endocarditis
Any limitations or restrictions on any activities
(Lessard et al. 2005; Wilson et al. 2007)
C. Social History
• Patient is in sixth grade
• Patient is involved in skateboarding, soccer,
basketball
Patient has a fourteen‐year‐old sister and nine‐year‐
•
old brother
• Parents are married
• Father works full time; mother is a full‐time
homemaker
• Family recently relocated; no previous dental records
• Socioeconomic status is low to mid‐level
D. Medical History
• Mild, innocent heart murmur detected at one‐month
well baby check. Heart murmur has never been
detected since the initial episode (see Fundamental
Point 1 and Background Information 1)
• No medications
E. Medical Consult
• Consultation with child’s pediatrician confirms status
of heart murmur as being innocent or nonexistent.
Pediatrician reports there is no need for antibiotic
coverage prior to high‐risk dental procedures
F.
Dental History
• Family recently relocated; no previous dental record
available
• Usually routine six‐month check‐ups, but last visit was
one year ago
• Sealants placed
• Optimal water fluoridation levels
• Healthy, low‐cariogenic diet
• Brushes teeth without supervision one time per day
• Flosses without supervision, on occasion
• No history of dental caries or dental restorations
other than sealants
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 61

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
• History of trauma to the maxillary left permanent
central incisor more than one year ago (never restored)
(see Fundamental Point 2)
• Positive behavior for all previous care
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1
Heart Murmurs
• A heart murmur is a prevalent nding in pediatric
dental patients. Almost 90% of infants have a
detectable heart murmur, particularly if they are
febrile or dehydrated
• Most of these are clinically insignificant and are
referred to as being “innocent.” They are caused
by an increased flow or turbulence across
anatomically normal valves
•
Murmurs are of major concern to dentists
because certain dental procedures occasionally
induce severe cardiovascular complications
• Murmurs may indicate existing heart disease
that is a risk factor for infective endocarditis
following a dental procedure
• Echocardiography is the primary means of
evaluating heart murmurs
• Understanding the medical evaluation and
assessment of a heart murmur fosters better
communication with other health care
professionals and results in improved patient care
• Dentists should be familiar with the latest
guidelines from the American Heart Association
(AHA) for the prevention of infective endocarditis
(Lessard et al. 2005; Wilson et al. 2007)
G. Extraoral Exam (Figure 2.6.1)
• Head and neck: within normal limits
• Weight: 39.8 kg; height: 157.5 cm (62 inches); body
mass index: normal
• No signs of trauma to extra‐oral hard or soft tissues
• No other significant findings
Figure 2.6.2 Preoperative view.
Intraoral Exam
H.
• Soft tissues: within normal limits
• Late mixed dentition
• Maxillary right and left primary canines exfoliated
recently
• Occlusion: 2 mm overjet, 30% overbite; adequate
spacing both arches; class I permanent molars,
permanent canines are erupting
• Mild plaque accumulation
• Oral hygiene is good
• Caries‐free dentition
• Poor margins on three sealants: maxillary permanent
first molars and mandibular right permanent
firstmolar
• Maxillary left permanent central incisor has an
asymptomatic, nonmobile, uncomplicated crown
fracture (Figure2.6.2)
I. Diagnostic Tools
• Routine radiographs were taken within one year by
the child’s previous dentist, including bitewing radiographs and a panorex. Periapical radiographs had
previously been obtained. These radiographs were
requested but were not available
• Preoperative periapical radiograph of the maxillary
leftpermanent central incisor was taken prior to
restorative treatment and showed no pathology
(Figure2.6.3)
•
Maxillary left permanent central incisor responded
normally to palpation, percussion, electrical, and
thermal testing
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 2
Post‐Trauma Assessment
• Rule out additional, undiagnosed intraoral or
extraoral trauma
• Rule out any possibility of child abuse
• Story is consistent and ts the clinical picture
• No additional trauma noted
• No other suspicious trauma locations
62 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 3
Mouthguards
• For preventing traumatic injury, custom
mouthguards are more protective, comfortable,
and retentive than preformed mouthguards.
Therefore, they are more likely to be worn
during sports (AAPD 2018–2019)
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Figure 2.6.3 Anterior periapical radiograph.
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Differential Diagnosis
Not applicable
•
K. Diagnosis andProblem List
Diagnosis
• Faulty margins on sealants on maxillary permanent
molars and mandibular right permanent first molar
• Uncomplicated, crown fracture on the maxillary leftpermanent central incisor involving the mesial, incisal,facial,
and lingual (MIFL) surfaces (more thanone year ago)
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Figure 2.6.4 Administration of local anesthetic.
Figure 2.6.5 Preoperative view of the fractured maxillary
permanent left central incisor.
A
Problem List
• Marginal defects on sealants on maxillary
permanentfirst molars and mandibular right
permanent firstmolar
• Uncomplicated, crown fracture of the maxillary
leftpermanent central incisor MIFL
• Irregular dental home
L. Comprehensive Treatment Plan
• Establish a regular dental home
• Dental prophylaxis
• Fluoride treatment
• Review of oral hygiene (with parent and child)
• Re‐seal maxillary permanent first molars and mandibular right permanent first molar
• Restore maxillary left permanent central incisor MIFL
fracture with resin restorative material (Donly and
García‐Godoy 2015)
• Custom mouthguard to prevent further trauma
because patient is involved in multiple contact sports
(see Fundamental Point 3)
• Six‐month recall: re‐evaluate traumatized tooth
number 9, re‐evaluate oral hygiene status
M. Treatment (Figures2.6.4–2.6.11)
CB
Figure 2.6.6 (A–C) Placement of a 1.5 mm chamfer (arrow) on
the enamel margins with a number 1 DT diamond bur.
A
CB
Figure 2.6.7 (A–C) Placement of a slight 1 mm bevel (arrow)
on the chamfer with a number 1/8A diamond bur.
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 63
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
BA
Figure 2.6.8 (A, B) Placement of a thin layer of glass ionomer
liner on the exposed dentin.
A
B
A
B
Figure 2.6.10 (A, B) Polishing of restoration.
Figure 2.6.9 (A, B) Placement of a clear matrix band to
prevent etching and bonding of adjacent tooth. Enamel
margins were etched for 60 seconds with 35% phosphoric
acid and thoroughly rinsed.
N. Prognosis andDiscussion
• The prognosis for maintaining the low caries rate is
excellent due to good oral hygiene and history of no
previous dental caries
• The prognosis for the traumatized tooth is good due
to the lack of sensitivity after one year. The tooth
responds normally to palpation, percussion, electrical,
and thermal testing
• Moderate risk of traumatic injury can be reduced if
parents and patient are compliant with mouthguard
fabrication and use
Figure 2.6.11 Final restoration.
• Consider follow‐up periapical radiographs at the
six‐month post‐trauma check, sooner if symptoms
develop
O. Complications andAlternative
TreatmentPlan
• How would the management differ if the patient had
a severe heart murmur and a previous history of
infective endocarditis?
• How would the management differ if the patient had
excess overjet and severe lip incompetence?
64 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Self‐Study Questions
https://t.me/medicina_free
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
1. What type of radiographs are indicated for a
patient with a traumatized permanent incisor?
2. Following an uncomplicated crown fracture,
when is nal restoration recommended?
3. If a root fracture in the middle third of the root
had occurred, what treatment would be indicated?
Answers are located at the end of the case
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 65
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Self‐Study Answers
1. Diagnostic errors are reduced when practitioners
take two or more periapical radiographs following a
traumatic injury. Each image should have a slightly
altered beam direction
2. Final restoration is recommended in six to eight
weeks
Bibliography
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2018–2019. Policy
prevention of sports‐related orofacial injuries. In: Clinical
Practice Guidelines and Best Practices (Reference Manual).
Pediatr Dent 40:86–91. https://www.aapd.org/research/oral‐
health‐policies‐‐recommendations/prevention‐of‐sports‐
related‐orofacial‐injuries
Donly KJ, Garcia‐Godoy F. 2015. The use of resin‐based com-
posite in children: an update. Pediatr Dent 37(2):136–43.
Lessard E, Glick M, Ahmed S, Saric M. 2005. The patient with a
heart murmur: evaluation, assessment and dental considerations. J Am Dent Assoc 136(3):347–56.
3. Stabilization with a splint for six to eight weeks or
until mobility is reduced
Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M etal. 2007. Prevention ofinfec-
tive endocarditis. Guidelines from the American Heart
Association. A guideline from the American Heart
Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki
Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in
the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on
Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of
Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working
Group. J Am Dent Assoc 138(6):739–60.
66 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Case 7
https://t.me/medicina_free
Strip Crowns
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
•
BA
High cariogenic diet
• Optimal water fluoridation levels
• Patient is very apprehensive and anxious
Extraoral Exam
G.
• Slightly convex profile (Figure2.7.1)
• No other significant findings
Figure 2.7.1 (A, B) Facial photographs.
A. Presenting Patient
• Two‐year‐, eleven‐month‐old Caucasian female
(Figure2.7.1)
• New patient visit
B. Chief Complaint
• Mother states, “I think my daughter has cavities”
C. Social History
• Patient does not yet attend school
• Parents are married
• Socioeconomic status is mid‐level
Medical History
D.
• Patient is American Society of Anesthesiologists
(ASA) class I
• Patient has never been hospitalized or visited the
emergency room for treatment
• No medications
• No known drug allergies
E. Medical Consult
• Not necessary at this time
H. Intraoral Exam
• Primary dentition (Figure2.7.2)
• Occlusion: mesial step primary molars, right and left;
no crowding
• Soft tissue: within normal limits
• Moderate plaque accumulation
• Oral hygiene is poor
• Caries present in maxillary anterior and maxillary right
first primary molars
• Patient very uncooperative for exam. Parent consents
to treatment under general anesthesia
I. Diagnostic Tools
• Two bitewing radiographs (Figure2.7.3)
BA
C
F. Dental History
• Patient has never been to the dentist
• Parents have just recently initiated brushing child’s
teeth once daily
Figure 2.7.2 (A–C) Preoperative right, left, and maxillary views.
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 67
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
BA
Figure 2.7.3 (A, B) Right and left bitewing radiographs.
BA
Figure 2.7.4 (A, B) Maxillary and mandibular occlusal
radiographs.
• Maxillary and mandibular occlusal radiographs
(Figure2.7.4)
• Radiographs were obtained while patient was under
general anesthesia
• Radiographs show multiple carious lesions
J. Differential Diagnosis
• Not applicable
• Three‐month recall: re‐evaluate caries risk, re‐evaluate
oral hygiene status, review oral hygiene and diet with
parent and child
M. Treatment (Figures2.7.5–2.7.9
andFundamentalPoint 1)
Figure 2.7.5 Absolute isolation before starting procedure.
Figure 2.7.6 Preparation for strip crowns with a tapered
diamond bur. Approximately 1.5
mm reduction is necessary.
K. Diagnosis andProblem List
Diagnosis
• Early childhood caries
Problem List
• Moderate to high caries risk due to moderate plaque
accumulation, poor oral hygiene, poor diet, and
carieshistory
Multiple dental caries
•
• Very uncooperative and combative; patient requires
general anesthesia for treatment
L. Comprehensive Treatment Plan
• Establish a dental home
• Dental prophylaxis
• Fluoride treatment
• Maxillary incisor strip crowns, stainless steel crown
on maxillary right first primary molar
• Consider sealants on all primary molar occlusal surfaces
• Prescribe a remineralizing product such as those
containing amorphous calcium phosphate
• Diet modification
Figure 2.7.7 Fitting the strip crowns.
Figure 2.7.8 Etching of the teeth.
Figure 2.7.9 Strip crowns completed.
68 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

N. Prognosis andDiscussion
https://t.me/medicina_free
• If there is good compliance with the proposed
prevention plan, then the prognosis for avoiding
further caries is good
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 1
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Strip Crowns
• The isolation of teeth is critical when placing strip
crowns. Any contamination will have a negative
effect on the acid‐etch effectiveness, as well as the
ability to obtain an adequate bond of resin to the
tooth structure. When possible, ligation of a rubber
dam around teeth to be treated can be achieved with
dental oss or dental tape (Figure2.7.5). Preparation
of teeth for a strip crown involves incisal reduction of
approximately 1.5 mm with mesial and distal tooth
reduction, which obtains adequate proximal space to
t strip crowns. Beveling of the facial and lingual
incisal preparation provides the reduction necessary
to t strip crowns. Atapered diamond bur is ideal for
preparing teeth for strip crowns. Following this
general preparation, any decay that remains should
be removed with a round bur (Figure2.7.6)
• After the strip crown preparation is completed, a
glass ionomer cement liner/base can be placed in
areas where the preparation extends well into the
dentin. At this time, strip crowns are selected,
choosing the size that most closely replaces the
original tooth dimensions. The gingival margin of the
strip crown should be cut with scissors so that the
original incisal height of the tooth is achieved and the
gingival margin of the strip crown adapts to the
remaining tooth structure (Figure2.7.7). All of the
tooth structure and the glass ionomer liner/base is
then acid etched with 37% phosphoric acid for
approximately 30 seconds (Figure2.7.8). The etchant
is rinsed away with a water spray and the tooth is
thoroughly air dried. An adhesive is applied, according
to manufacturer instructions, and light cured. It is
helpful to place a small hole in the incisal edge of the
strip crown so that composite can extrude when the
crown is pushed into place over the prepared tooth.
This relieves the potential for air voids to be created.
Resin‐based composite is placed into the strip crown.
(Highly lled resins provide excellent esthetics where
margins of the preparation are not apparent through
the restorative material.) The excess resin that
extrudes through the hole can be easily removed
when nishing and polishing. When the strip crown
is t into place, excess resin at the gingival margin
can be removed with the tip of an explorer prior to
photo‐polymerization of the resin. The resin can then
be light‐cured from both the facial and lingual
surfaces. Following polymerization, the strip crown is
cut away and the resin surface is nished and
polished (Figure2.7.9)
(Lee 2002; Waggoner 2002; Donly and García-Godoy
2015; Waggoner 2015)
Self‐Study Questions
1. What indicates the use of crowns rather
thanplacing composites on anterior teeth in
children?
2. List the different types of crowns for children
3. What type of radiographs are indicated for a
patient with an early mixed dentition?
4. What are the three categories of information used
to make a caries risk assessment as dened by the
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry?
5. Why is a hole placed in the incisal edge of the
strip crown prior to the placement of the resin‐
based composite?
Answers are located at the end of the case
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 69
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
