Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_20_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана
.pdf
CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
• Full complement of primary dentition
• Carious lesions on the maxillary right primary lateral
incisor (FIL) and the maxillary left primary lateral incisor (F)
• Facial decalcification on the maxillary primary central
incisors
• Occlusion: bilateral mesial step molar relationship,
bilateral class I canine occlusion, midline aligned;
2 mm overjet, 90% overbite
I. Diagnostic Tools
• Maxillary anterior periapical radiograph (size 2 film)
was obtained (see Figure2.4.3)
• Bitewing radiographs were not indicated due to open
contacts and visual absence of caries per American
Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) guidelines
(AAPD 2018–2019a)
Differential Diagnosis
J.
• Not applicable
K. Diagnosis
• Early childhood caries
•
Manage facial decalcification on the maxillary primary
central incisors with a prescription remineralizing
product such as those containing amorphous calcium
phosphate
• Prevention plan:
Three‐month periodic dental examination
Oral hygiene instructions
Dietary counseling
Use of fluoridated toothpaste and consumption of
fluoridated water
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 1
Anticipated Treatment Difculties
•
Patient cooperation due to age and parent’s
prediction of behavior
• Isolation of tooth as a result of proximity of
caries to gingiva
L. Treatment Plan
• Maxillary right primary lateral incisor (FIL) resin
restoration
• Maxillary left primary lateral incisor (F) resin‐modified
glass ionomer (RMGI) cement (see Background
Information 1)
Figure 2.4.3 Preoperative maxillary occlusal radiograph.
Restorative Treatment fortheMaxillary
M.
Left Primary Lateral Incisor
• Restoration with RMGI cement (AAPD 2018–2019b)
(see Fundamental Points 1 and 2)
N. Prognosis
• The prognosis for this site to remain caries free is
good due to the fluoride‐releasing property of the
restorative material, which reduces the chance of
recurrent caries
• High success for retention is expected because the
restoration is not subjected to high occlusal force and
it chemically bonds to the tooth structure
O. Alternative Treatment
• Interim therapeutic restoration
• Less invasive restorative technique without local
anesthetic (see Fundamental Point 3)
• Gross caries removal with hand instruments
( excavator and hatchet)
• Slow‐speed rotary instrument with light pressure may
be used to improve cavity design
• Restorative material is usually glass ionomer cement
or RMGI
50 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

FUNDAMENTAL POINT 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Class V Preparation (Figure2.4.4)
• Nitrous oxide conscious sedation was used for
behavior management
• Local anesthetic was not necessary for this patient
• Cotton roll isolation was adequate
• The cavity outline is kidney‐shaped and followsthe
extent of the lesion to provide retention
• This may be done with a number 330 carbide or
diamond bur
• Removal of caries was done using a slowspeed
round bur
• The cavosurface margins of the cavity preparation
must be 90° (butt joint)
Figure 2.4.4 Class V cavity preparation.
Placement ofResin‐Modied Glass Ionomer
• Place a retraction cord, if necessary
• Mix powder and liquid components of the RMGI
thoroughly, following manufacturer’s directions, and
load into an appropriate syringe tip
• The dentin is conditioned/primed (depending on
brand used) according to the manufacturer’s
recommendation
• Inject the mixed RMGI into the cavity preparation
and condense with a hand instrument to eliminate
any voids
• The instrument may be dabbed in a bonding agent
to prevent the RMGI from sticking to it andpulling
the restoration out of the cavity preparation. It
also reduces the surface
restoration
• Contour and remove excess material
• Light cure for approximately 40 seconds, placing
the light as close to the restoration as possible
without touching it
Finishing ofResin‐Modied Glass Ionomer
• Finishing with a rotary instrument may not be
necessary if the above steps were done properly
• Use of a nishing bur at very low speed to reduce
roughness is appropriate
• The RMGI should have an unlled resin adhesive
placed over the nal restoration surface
roughness of the
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1
Properties ofResin‐Modied Glass Ionomer
• Chemically bonds to enamel and dentin
• Releases fluoride
• Provides acceptable esthetics
• Less moisture sensitivity than resin‐based
composite
Indications forClass V Glass Ionomer Cement
Restoration
• Difficulty isolating the tooth (less moisture
sensitive than resin‐based composite)
• Poor patient behavior (easy and fast)
• Moderate caries risk (fluoride release
(Croll and Nicholson 2002; Berg 2002; Berg and
Croll 2015; Waggoner 2015)
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 3
Indications forInterim Therapeutic Restoration
• Uncooperative patients that will be managed
nonpharmacologically
• Patients with special needs
• Interim restoration for caries control
• Instances in which other restorative materials
cannot be used (AAPD 2018–2019c)
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 51
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

https://t.me/medicina_free
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Self‐Study Questions
https://t.me/medicina_free
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
1. What are the properties of RMGI?
2. What are the indications for class V GIC restoration?
3. What are the indications for interim therapeutic
restoration?
4. How should an RMGI restoration be
nished?
Answers are located at the end of the case
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 53
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
Self‐Study Answers
1. Chemical bonding to enamel and dentin, release
of fluoride, acceptable esthetics, less moisture
sensitivity than resin‐based composite
2. Difficult tooth isolation, poor patient behavior,
patients with moderate caries risk
3. Uncooperative patients who will be managed
nonpharmacologically, patients with special needs,
Bibliography
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2018–2019a.
Prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and individuals with special health care needs. In:
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Best Practices (Reference
Manual). Pediatr Dent 40:213–15. https://www.aapd.org/
research/oral‐health‐policies‐‐recommendations/prescribing‐
dental‐radiographs‐for‐infants‐children‐adolescents‐and‐
individuals‐with‐special‐health‐care‐needs
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2018–2019b.
Pediatric restorative dentistry. In: Clinical Practice Guidelines
and Best Practices (Reference Manual). Pediatr Dent
40:330–42. https://www.aapd.org/research/oral‐health‐policies‐‐
recommendations/pediatric‐restorative‐dentistry
interim restoration for caries control, when other
restorative materials cannot be used
4. Finishing with a rotary instrument may not be
necessary if steps in placing restoration are done
properly, a finishing bur at very low speed reduces
roughness, place an unfilled resin adhesive over the
final restoration
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2018–2019c. Policy
on interim therapeutic restorations (ITR). In: Clinical Practice
Guidelines and Best Practices (Reference Manual). Pediatr
Dent 40:58–9. https://www.aapd.org/research/oral‐health‐
policies‐‐recommendations/interim‐therapeutic‐restorations
Berg JH. 2002. Glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent
24(5):430–8.
Berg JH, Croll TP. 2015. Glass ionomer restorative cement
systems: an update. Pediatr Dent 37(2):116–24.
Croll TP, Nicholson JW. 2002. Glass ionomer cements in
pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent
24(5):423–9.
Waggoner WF. 2015. Restoring primary anterior teeth: update
for 2014. Pediatr Dent 37(2):163–70.
54 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Case 5
https://t.me/medicina_free
Class V Resin Restoration
BA
Figure 2.5.1 (A, B) Facial photographs.
A. Presenting Patient
• Four‐year‐, ten‐month‐old Asian female (Figure2.5.1)
• New patient visit
B. Chief Complaint
• Mother states, “My daughter needs a check‐up and is
very nervous”
C. Social History
• Patient is in preschool
• Lives with mother
• Patient has a sister (six years old)
• Mother is the primary caregiver and works full time
• Socioeconomic status is lower‐level
D. Medical History
• Patient was hypoglycemic at birth and was kept in the
hospital for observation (see Fundamental Point 1).
• No medications
• No known disease and no history of allergies
E. Medical Consult
• Not necessary at this time
F. Dental History
• Prior to this visit the patient has not been to dentist in
more than two years
• Patient was fearful and anxious about the dental
examination
• Optimal water fluoridation levels
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
•
Moderately cariogenic diet, including one and a half
cups of juice daily
• Toothbrushing without supervision twice daily
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 1
Hypoglycemia
• Obtain a complete understanding of
hypoglycemia:
When was the most recent hypoglycemic
episode and has the patient experienced any
complications from being hypoglycemic?
Has the patient been placed on a special or
restricted diet?
• Be prepared to manage a patient that becomes
hypoglycemic while in your care:
A patient who is conscious can receive oral
carbohydrates in the form of cake frosting.
Iforal carbohydrates are ineffective, medical
assistance should be called to the scene. Fifty
percent dextrose can be administered by an
intravenous catheter if the patient becomes
unconscious. However, if intravenous access
is unavailable, glucagon can be administered
intramuscularly (Malamed 2000)
Extraoral Exam (Figure2.5.1)
G.
• No significant findings
H. Intraoral Exam (Figure2.5.2)
• Primary dentition
• Exfoliating lower central incisors
• Occlusion: 1 mm overjet, 10% overbite; generalized
spacing in anterior, closed contacts in posterior; 2 mm
diastema; mesial step primary molars, class I canines
(see Fundamental Point 2)
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 55
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
BA
Figure 2.5.2 (A–E) Preoperative photographs.
• Soft tissues: within normal limits
• Moderate plaque accumulation
• Oral hygiene is poor
• Multiple carious lesions
I. Diagnostic Tools
• See American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD)
radiographic guidelines (AAPD 2018–2019a)
• Two bitewing radiographs (Figure2.5.3)
• Anterior maxillary and mandibular periapical
radiographs (Figure2.5.4)
• Radiographs show multiple carious lesions
C
ED
K. Diagnosis andProblem List
Diagnosis
• Multiple carious lesions
• Poor oral hygiene
Problem List
• High caries risk due to cariogenic diet, poor oral
hygiene, and history of decay
• Generalized plaque accumulation
• No dental home
J. Differential Diagnosis
• Not applicable
A B
Figure 2.5.3 (A, B) Bitewing radiographs.
A
Figure 2.5.4 (A) Anterior maxillary; (B) Anterior mandibular
radiographs.
B
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 2
Orthodontic Evaluation
• Malocclusion: orthodontic evaluation in primary
dentition:
Identify all anomalies of tooth number and size
Identify any anterior or posterior crossbites if
present
Address the presence of habits along with
their skeletal or dental sequelae
(AAPD 2018–2019b)
L. Comprehensive Treatment Plan
• Establish a dental home and reduce apprehension for
dental care
• Prevention plan:
Dental prophylaxis
Fluoride treatment (5% fluoride varnish placed)
(seeFundamental Point 3)
Review oral hygiene with parent and child
Recommend use of floss
56 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

• Three‐month recall:
https://t.me/medicina_free
Re‐evaluate oral hygiene status and caries risk
• Restore decayed teeth (see Fundamental Point 4):
Maxillary left primary canine‐facial decay: resin
restoration
Maxillary right primary first molar‐distal decay:
stainless steel crown
Address apprehensive behavior: recommend use of
nitrous oxide/oxygen
• Attempt to remineralize the incipient lesions with a
remineralizing product such as those containing
amorphous calcium phosphate:
Maxillary right primary second molar‐mesial
incipient lesion
Mandibular left primary second molar‐mesial
incipient lesion
Mandibular left primary first molar‐distal incipient
lesion
Mandibular right primary second molar‐mesial
incipient lesion
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Figure 2.5.7 Placement of resin.
M. Treatment
• Treatment (see Background Information 1):
Local anesthesia: 36 mg of lidocaine with 1:100 000
epinephrine was administered
Rubber dam isolation: a clamp was placed on the
maxillary left primary second molar to achieve
isolation (Figures2.5.5–2.5.8)
• Behavior management was achieved with nitrous
oxide sedation and tell‐show‐do technique
Figure 2.5.5 Rubber dam isolation.
Figure 2.5.6 Placement of bonding agent.
Figure 2.5.8 Final restoration.
N.
Prognosis andDiscussion
• The prognosis for future caries is poor due to the
patient’s moderate cariogenic diet and poor oral
hygiene. Prognosis could be improved with implementation of the proposed prevention plan. Efforts
should be made to reduce the patient’s anxiety, to
wean off the nitrous oxide, and establish a comfort
level with dental care
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 3
Fluoride Varnish
• Due to the patient’s high caries risk and young
age, uoride varnish was placed. Fluoride varnish
may be substituted for the traditional topical
uoride treatment for the caries‐active preschooler. Varnish may be applied after the prophylaxis and may be ossed through tight contacts
(Soxman 2005). It is easily applied and enhances
remineralization. Three‐yearly applications of
uoride varnish have been used effectively for
children under the age of ve (Featherstone 2006)
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 57
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

CHAPTER 2
https://t.me/medicina_free
O. Complications andAlternative
TreatmentPlan
• Should the treatment plan be more aggressive to
manage the patient’s decay?
• Would daily use of a fluoridated mouthrinse be
effective in remineralizing the incipient lesions?
• If the patient lived in a nonfluoridated community
would treatment differ?
FUNDAMENTAL POINT 4
Selection ofRestorative Material
• The class V lesion in this patient was restored
with a resin composite. It was chosen due to
esthetics and its resistance to wear. Resin‐
based composites are available in a variety of
shades and opacities and their physical and
mechanical properties are excellent (Waggoner
and Nelson 2019)
• According to the Pediatric Restorative
Dentistry Consensus Conference held in
SanAntonio, Texas, in 2002, a class V lesion
in primary teeth can be restored with a
resin‐based composite. The tooth, however,
must be adequately isolated to prevent
salivacontamination (AAPD 2002). This was
again recommended through the AAPD in
2015 (Donly and Garcia‐Godoy 2015;
Waggoner 2015)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1
Class V Resin‐Based Composite Restoration
• Class V restorations are often needed on the
facial of cuspids. The caries should be removed
with a 330 bur until dentin is reached. The bur is
then moved laterally into sound dentin and
enamel to create the walls of the cavity. The
pulpal wall should be convex, following the
shape of the outer enamel surface. The lateral
walls should be slightly ared near the proximal
surfaces to prevent undermining of the enamel.
A short bevel is then placed around the entire
cavosurface margin (Waggoner and Nelson
2019, Waggoner 2015). It is important to place a
beveled enamel margin and a butt cementum/
dentin margin to enhance retention of the resin
In addition, several clinical steps must be taken
•
to allow the resin to adhere to the tooth structure. Mechanical retention is achieved by flowing
the water‐tolerant primer into the surface of the
dentin where it permeates into the spaces of
the collagen that were created by the acid etch.
The primer will then allow the hydrophobic
bonding agent to bond to the wet surface of the
dentin. The bonding agent then bonds to the
primer and the composite resin (Berg 1998). The
resin can then be finished and polished
• If silver diamine fluoride had previously been
applied to arrest caries, there will not be an adverse
effect on the bond to dentin (Quock etal. 2012)
58 Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH

Self‐Study Questions
https://t.me/medicina_free
RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
1. According to the AAPD Caries Risk
AssessmentTool, what risk category would be
assigned to a patient with evidence of radiographic
enamel caries?
2. Which radiographs should be taken in a
newpatient in primary dentition that presentswith closed contacts in the posterior
teeth?
3. What is meant by the phrase “tell‐show‐do” in
behavior management?
4. What is the concentration of uoride ion in 5%
sodium uoride varnish?
5. Is local anesthesia always necessary for class V
restorations?
Answers are located at the end of the case
Clinical Cases inPediatric Dentistry 59
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
