Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4437_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
55 Мб
Скачать
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
Fig. 14.5 Division of the middle thyroid vein to free the thyroid gland laterally
Fig. 14.6 The STA is individually divided low on the thyroid gland to prevent injury of the EB-SLN
thyroid [65]. The middle thyroid veins should be cleaned of adjacent tissues to prevent any injury to the RLN when these veins are ligated and divided. It is always safest to mobilize tissues parallel to the RLN [66].
14.5.1.3 Mobilization ofThyroid Gland andIdentication ofUpperPTGs
Dissection is performed superiorly, laterally, and posteriorly with a small peanut sponge on a clamp. The STA and veins are identied by retracting the thyroid inferiorly and medially. They are individually identied and divided low on the thyroid gland to prevent injury of the EB-SLN (Fig. 14.6). The tissues lateral to the upper lobe of the thyroid and medial to the carotid sheath can be mobilized caudally to the cricothy­roid muscle (Fig.14.7); the RLN enters the crico-
415
Fig. 14.7 Mobilizing the upper part of the thyroid lobe caudally to the cricothyroid muscle
thyroid muscle at the level of the cricoid cartilage, rst passing through Berry’s ligament [67, 68]. The upper PTG is often identied at the level of the cricoid cartilage [69].
To prevent injury to the EB-SLN, the vessels are divided and ligated on the thyroid surface, the thyroid is retracted laterally and caudally, and dissection is carried out on the medial edge of the thyroid gland and lateral to the cricothyroid mus­cle. As alternatives to sutures, devices such as the harmonic scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) and the LigaSure Precise (Valleylab) may be used to control vessels [70, 71].
It is essential to avoid injury of the EB-SLN, the motor branch of SLN responsible for tensing the vocal cords. The EB-SLN runs on the surface of the cricothyroid muscle in about 80% of patients, with the superior pole vessels in about 10%, and within the cricothyroid muscle in the remaining 10%. Injury to the EB-SLN occurs in as many as 10% of patients undergoing thyroid­ectomy [72]. The best ways of preventing such injury are (1) providing gentle traction on the thyroid gland in a caudal and lateral direction and (2) ligating the superior pole vessels directly on the capsule of the upper pole individually and low on the thyroid gland rather than to cross­clamp the entire superior pole pedicle [69, 72].
14.5.1.4 Identication ofRLNs
andLower PTGs
When the thyroid lobe is further mobilized, the lower PTG is usually seen anterior to the RLN,
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
416
Fig. 14.8 Identication and dissection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN)
usually inferior to where the ITA crosses the RLN [73]. The carotid sheath is retracted later­ally, and the thyroid gland is retracted anteriorly and medially to facilitate the identication of the RLN [74] (Fig.14.8). The nerve is situated more medially on the left (running in the tracheo­esophageal groove) and more obliquely on the right. Dissection should proceed cephalic along the lateral edge of the thyroid.
With the thyroid retracted anteriorly, these short peri-tracheal vessels running through the suspensory ligament of Berry are successively clamped with curved mosquito clamps on the tra­cheal surface from posterior to anterior and sharply divided. The minute arterial branches must be ligated or suture-ligated; they may be the source of a severe, rapidly developing bleeding with compression. When a short bleeding stump retracts beneath the RLN, bleeding must be con­trolled with ne stick tie ligatures, with the nerve being carefully protected [75]. In some patients (about 15%), the peduncle of Zuckerkandl, a small protuberance of thyroid tissue on the right, tends to obscure the RLN at the level of Berry’s ligament [76]. Fatty and lymphatic tissues imme­diately adjacent to the thyroid gland are swept from it with a peanut sponge on a clamp, and small vessels are ligated. No tissue should be tran­sected until one is sure that it is not the RLN [77].
The upper PTGs are usually situated on each side of the thyroid gland at the level where the RLN enters the cricothyroid muscle at the level of the cricoid cartilage [74]. Thus, the area cephalic to the cricoid cartilage is relatively safe [77].
M. Sakr
Fig. 14.9 Mobilization of the pyramidal lobe
14.5.1.5 Mobilization ofPyramidalLobe
The pyramidal lobe is found in about 80% of patients. It extends in a cephalic direction, often through the notch in the thyroid cartilage to the hyoid bone. One or more LNs are frequently found just cephalic to the isthmus of the thyroid gland over the cricothyroid membrane (Delphian LNs) [60]. The pyramidal lobe is mobilized by retracting it caudally and by dissecting immedi­ately adjacent to it in a cephalic direction. Small vessels are coagulated or ligated (Fig.14.9).
14.5.1.6 Thyroid Resection
Once the PTGs have been carefully swept or dis­sected from the thyroid gland and the RLN has been identied, the thyroid lobe can be quickly resected (Fig.14.10). For TT, the same operation is done again on the other side [76, 78].
14.5.1.7 Drainage
The fear of a hematoma enlarging and obstruct­ing the airway prompts many surgeons to use drains routinely after thyroid surgery [79, 80]. However, drains may be blocked by blood clots, add the patient’s discomfort, deteriorating the cosmetic result and increasing hospital stay [81]. The routine need for use of drains in thyroid sur­gery has been debated.
14.5.1.8 Closure
The sterno-thyroid muscles are approximated, and a small opening is left in the midline at the
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
Fig. 14.10 Resection of the thyroid lobe with the para­thyroid gland preserved and the recurrent laryngeal nerve identied and dissected throughout its course
suprasternal notch to allow any clotted blood to exit. The sterno-hyoid muscles are approximated in a similar fashion, as is the platysma. The skin is then closed with a subcuticular stitch. A sterile dressing is applied [82].
417
gesic requirement. The amount of analgesics used within the rst 24h after surgery is signi­cantly less in patients receiving a apless thy­roidectomy than those receiving the conventional thyroidectomy. Similarly, patients receiving ap­less thyroidectomy experienced less postopera­tive pain like that in other MITS [84].
The potential advantages of a apless conven­tional thyroidectomy over a conventional thy­roidectomy include (1) less tissue trauma, (2) less blood loss and seroma formation, (3) less postop­erative pain, and (4) less postoperative analgesic requirement. In addition, the apless procedure does not require any specialized instruments or additional charges [84].
14.7 Minimally Invasive Thyroid
Surgery (MITS)
14.7.1 Introduction
14.5.2 Postoperative Care
The duration of a thyroid operation is usually 1–3h, depending on the size and invasiveness of the tumor, its vascularity, and the location of the PTGs. Postoperatively, the patient is kept in a low Fowler position with the head and shoulders ele­vated 10°–20° for 6–12h to maintain negative pressure in the veins. The patient typically resumes eating within 3–4h, and an anti-emetic is ordered as needed [83].
14.6 Flapless Conventional Thyroidectomy
The apless conventional thyroidectomy is con­sidered to be a safe and technically feasible surgi­cal modality, which is therefore an effective alternative to a traditional conventional thyroid­ectomy. A apless conventional thyroidectomy could also be listed among other variables when dening surgical invasiveness, since it is associ­ated with reductions in blood loss, the surgical cost, postoperative pain, and postoperative anal-
After nearly a hundred years of performing a thy­roidectomy essentially the way it was described by Theodore Kocher [85] in the nineteenth cen­tury, the past decades have seen dramatic changes in modern surgical technique [86, 87]. Much of this change has been technologically driven, with the introduction of high-resolution endoscopy [88, 89].
Minimally invasive surgery is dened as the ability of the surgeon to perform traditional sur­gical procedure in novel ways to minimize the trauma of surgical exposure. Many criteria are used to dene and discriminate among minimally invasive techniques (length of incision, pain, duration of operation, general or local anesthesia, cost, cosmetic results, and cure of the disease). When used in the context of the thyroid (and parathyroid) procedures, the term “minimally invasive” is currently not specic enough and overlaps with the conventional open procedure. It was proposed that this term may be used only to describe thyroid procedures that are routinely associated with an incision shorter than 3.0cm (and 2.5cm for parathyroidectomy) [9093]. In recent years, endoscopic surgery has emerged as an option for thyroid and parathyroid abnormali-
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
418
M. Sakr
ties. Surgeons in Japan and Italy have provided leadership in this eld. It appears to be driven by patient demand for either a smaller scar on the neck or no scar at all [11]. The concept of MITS is attractive because patients are concerned not only about the result of treating their thyroid dis­ease but also outcomes such as better cosmesis, reduced hospital stay, and decreased pain [9496].
14.7.2 Classication ofMITS
Many different techniques have been developed for MITS over a short period; these can be broadly classied into pure/or completely closed endoscopic techniques, video-assisted tech­niques, and minimally invasive open surgery. Ikeda et al. [14] classied minimally invasive thyroid procedures as follows: (1) Minimally invasive/mini-incision, (2) minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), and (3) completely closed endoscopic (supraclavicular approach, axillary approach, anterior chest approach, and breast approach). However, others believed that the extra-cervical endoscopic approaches, while they have the advantage of avoiding a cervical incision, require extensive dissection that exceeds that of conventional sur­gery, and in this regard cannot be considered minimally- invasive [89, 97100].
The concept of surgical invasiveness cannot be limited to the length or to the site of the skin inci­sion. It must be extended to all structures dis­sected during the procedure. Therefore, minimally invasive thyroidectomy should properly be dened as “operations through a short, <3cm, and discrete incision that permits direct access to the thyroid, resulting in a focused dissection” [11].
and impact on surgical techniques, it is likely that these minimally invasive approaches will become more widely used and easier to perform. As of now, MITS appears to be a useful addition to con­ventional thyroid surgery. Long-term follow-up and comparative trials are needed to validate these interesting techniques. There is a need to look into the expanding indications as well as the completeness of MITS procedures [95].
The application of MITS has expanded in the last decade and is being considered as an alterna­tive to the conventional. Major advantages of MITS techniques include reduced tissue trauma, shorter hospital stay, better cosmetic results, min­imal postoperative pain, reduced cost of health­care and, above all, patient comfort. Video-assisted endoscopic techniques in addition offer a magni­ed, illuminated view of the operating eld. The main disadvantages of MITS procedures are the longer duration of surgery, steep learning curve, and increased cost of surgery due to the equip­ment usage. The reported important complica­tions are similar to those seen after conventional thyroid surgery [12, 13, 15, 16, 101105].
Endoscopic surgery does not provide better results in terms of hospital stay and postoperative pain when compared with conventional open or mini-thyroidectomy [106]. In thyroid surgery, pure endoscopic techniques are more time con­suming than conventional techniques. They take from 90min for a thyroid lobectomy by cervical access, up to 280min for a TT by a chest wall approach. Whether minimally invasive proce­dures are actually less costly than conventional procedures is difcult to quantify [107, 108].
14.7.4 Direct Access MITS
(Mini-Incision)
14.7.3 Advantages andDisadvantages ofMITS
Judicious patient selection is the most important cornerstone for the success of any MITS tech­nique for both benign and malignant thyroid swellings. As technology continues to develop
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14.7.4.1 Midline Mini-incision Technique
In MITS performed by a minimized (2.5–3cm) cervical incision (Fig. 14.11), the access to the thyroid gland is direct. However, the volume of the nodule (<30–35mm at largest diameter) and even more importantly the volume of the thyroid lobe (<20–30 ml) limit their indications. With
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
Fig. 14.11 Direct access minimally invasive thyroid sur­gery (MITS) with a midline (central) mini-incision in the neck in a 27-year-old lady
advanced energy devices [109, 110] and the evo­lution of robust laryngeal nerve monitoring [111,
112], a faster and probably safer thyroidectomy
could be accomplished through a smaller incision than the 6–8cm of conventional open thyroidec­tomy. This has been widely recognized and is increasingly embraced [113115].
Thyroid operations that minimize the incision but keep it in the neck may be considered mini­mally invasive. These operations have some advantages over conventional cervicotomy in terms of postoperative pain and cosmetic results [11, 93, 116120].
14.7.4.2 Lateral Mini-Incision
Technique
In this technique, a small (2.5cm) lateral inci­sion is made over the nodule, and the subplatys-
mal ap is raised to allow skin incision to be move around the neck and relevant area of dis­section. The anterior border of the SCM is incised to expose the lateral margin of the strap muscle. The strap muscle is retracted medially, and the SCM is retracted laterally to expose the lateral part of the thyroid gland. The middle thyroid vein is rst divided and then the isthmus is mobilized and transected to allow maximal mobilization. The skin incision is then retracted cranially to expose the upper pole vessels, which are then divided. The lower pole is mobilized with careful capsular dissection with preservation of the infe­rior PTG. The thyroid gland is then delivered
419
through the skin incision. The rest of the proce­dure is similar to conventional thyroidectomy. With careful capsular dissection, the superior PTG and RLN can be dissected away from thy­roid gland and preserved.
Compared to conventional hemithyroidec­tomy, Sywak etal. reported a single arm-blinded randomized trial. They found that the mini­incision approach took an extra 10min, but was associated with a lower pain score on the rst postoperative day (2.67 versus 3.43, p= 0.032) and tenth day (1.5 versus 1.8, p=0.36), greater cosmetic satisfaction score (6.3 versus 5.0, p = 0.002), and a smaller wound (2.6 versus
5.4cm, p<0.001) [121]. However, owing to the fact that the incision is placed on one side of the neck only, it is limited to hemi-thyroidectomy. Nevertheless, it is relatively easier to learn than endoscopic operations [122, 123].
14.7.5 Minimally Invasive Video-
Assisted Thyroidectomy (MIVAT)
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) was rst introduced by Miccoli from Piza, Italy, in 1999 and was rapidly adopted [124,
125]. MIVAT is regarded as a “hybrid procedure”
as opposed to other endoscopic procedures because it requires both open and laparoscopic surgical skills.
14.7.5.1 Technique
The MIVAT procedure involves a gasless mini­mally invasive access to the thyroid gland charac­terized by external retraction, magnied endoscopic vision, and dissection by means of needlescopic and ultrasonic devices. A 1.5-cm midline incision is then made about 2cm above the sternal notch. The midline is incised longitu­dinally for 3–4cm to separate the strap muscles. The strap muscles are then separated from the thyroid with a blunt dissection. The operative eld is developed and maintained by an external retractor held by an assistant. After that, the oper­ation is conducted in an endoscopic/video-
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
420
M. Sakr
assisted manner. A 5-mm 30° telescope is inserted with the external branch of superior laryngeal nerve (EB-SLN) identied and preserved with the help of the optical magnication of the tele­scope. The superior lobe vessel is then either clipped or divided by ultrasonic shears. The supe­rior lobe is gradually pulled and delivered through the wound. Thereafter, the rest of the procedure is performed not dissimilar to the conventional thy­roidectomy. The contra-lateral lobe would be excised and delivered in similar manner. No drain is needed, and skin is closed with subcuticular stitches and sealant.
14.7.5.2 Indications/Contraindications andOutcome
This technique proved to be feasible, as safe as traditional surgery, viable for the treatment of small thyroid nodules [126] and yielded excellent cosmetic and surgical outcomes [127]. However, only 10–15% of patients with a small goiter would be suitable. Only patients with a solitary thyroid nodule (STN) <35 mm and/or thyroid vol­ume<25ml are considered suitable for MIVAT.In addition, size, re-done surgery, previous neck irra­diation, and locally invasive thyroid carcinoma are also considered absolute contraindications [128]. Presence of hyper-vascular gland such as Graves’ disease or thyroiditis was initially thought to be contraindications for MIVAT.However, in a latest review of 1946 patients, 17.9% of patients with benign disease on nal pathology had thy­roiditis while 30.9% of patients with malignancy had unexpected thyroiditis. Therefore, the pres­ence of thyroiditis is no longer considered a con­traindication in MIVAT [129].
Since 1999, the MIVAT approach has been widely extended and used for both benign and malignant thyroid lesions in both adult and pedi­atric patients [130132]. Later, it was used also to approach “low-risk” PTCs after demonstrating its ability to achieve thyroidectomy completeness for these patients [133]. Finally, the attempt to perform endoscopic central node compartment clearance via the same minimal access was accomplished, and the entire procedure proved to be viable and oncologically correct for dealing with a prophylactic TT in RET gene mutation
carrier patient [134]. Patients with PTC who underwent MIVAT had a good outcome during a 5-year follow-up period. The outcome was simi­lar to that for patients treated with conventional thyroidectomy and the same degree of exposure to post-surgical RAI treatment [135]. A study done by Ruggieri etal. (2010) [121], suggested that small nodules are one of the best indications for MIVAT.
The MIVAT has shown to be as safe as the existing gold standard operation. Furthermore, the primary outcome measure of pain and sec­ondary outcome measure of cosmesis both showed statistically signicant better results for MIVAT compared to conventional thyroidec­tomy. This was achieved at the expense of opera­tive time, which was signicantly longer for MIVAT [136]. A recent meta-analysis did not nd signicant differences in postoperative hypo­calcemia and RLN palsy rates, and the MIVAT generally took longer to complete. However, MIVAT was associated with a lower pain score at 24h postoperatively and better reported cosmesis score [121].
Based on their experience on MIVAT and cen­tral neck dissection (CND) via an average of 2 cm central neck incision, Bo Wu and Zheng Ding developed a procedure called “video­assisted selective lateral neck dissection” (VASLND) for PTC with suspicious node metas­tasis at level III, IV, or IIa through an extended 4–6cm cervical incision (166–168).
MIVAT appeared to have a comparable onco­logical outcome as conventional thyroidectomy for patients with PTC [134]. The thyroglobulin levels, thyrotrophin-stimulating hormone, and percentage of radiouptake were not different in early operations and long term follow-up [135,
136]. There was no signicant difference in cure
rate after a median follow-up of 5years in these groups of low-risk PTC patient [134].
14.7.6 Pure Endoscopic Techniques
ofThyroidectomy
For simplication, endoscopic approaches (tech­niques) could be categorized into (A)
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
421
cervical/direct approach and (B) extra-cervical/ indirect approach. Each technique or approach
has its own benets and weaknesses. Currently, there is no preferred approach in the literature and the choice seems to be determined by the sur­geon’s own experience and the patient’s preference.
14.7.6.1 Cervical/Direct Endoscopic Approaches
Pure endoscopic techniques using a “cervical access” are technically challenging due to the limited room for dissection. They are time con­suming, but with increasing experience and advances in surgical instrument design, shorter operating times are anticipated. Fear of insufation- related complications, such as hyper­capnia, extensive emphysema, and gas embo­lisms, is not sustained if appropriate precautions are taken, i.e. low ow 1L/min, and insufation pressure<10mmHg [116].
Endoscopic Lateral Approach: Unlike con­ventional thyroidectomy and MIVAT, the ini­tial incision is made over the SCM muscle. The thyroid gland is approached laterally through splitting of strap muscle and SCM.Henry etal. rst reported their technique on the endoscopic lateral approach in 1999 [137]. One 10-mm and two 3-mm ports were inserted along the SCM.Operating space is maintained with low­pressure CO2 insufation. Vital structures, like the PTG, RLN, and EB-SLN, could be readily identied and preserved. With the help of need­loscopic instruments and magnication, indi­vidual vessels can be controlled and the thyroid completely dissected free. The specimen is normally retrieved through a 12-mm incision.
However, one of the disadvantages with this approach is that only unilateral pathology can be resected (i.e., hemi-thyroidectomy) because the incision is only placed on one side of the neck. If the contralateral side needs to be explored at the same time, a collar incision (i.e. extension of the incision) would be required. However, only 5% will require a conversion if cases are properly selected [138].
14.7.6.2 Extra-Cervical/Indirect Endoscopic Approaches—Combined
Considering the extent of the dissection required in some of the endoscopic techniques, one can wonder if the term of minimally invasive is appropriate. This is particularly true for tech­niques using an extra- or noncervical approach or combined approaches. They consist of access to the thyroid eld through an axillary, anterior
chest, or mammary approach or combined approaches such as axillary and mammary
approach, or axillary and postauricular approach. These techniques are most developed in Asia, as in these countries, extra-cervical scars balance favorably with cervical scars [102, 139144].
These operations allow resection of large thy­roid tumors, up to 60mm in size, and enlarged glands, up to 60ml in volume. These extracervi­cal approaches have the main advantage of leav­ing no scar in the neck but cannot reasonably be described as minimally invasive, as they require more dissection than conventional open surgery. In addition, some of these procedures may require division of neck muscles. Whether transection of the omohyoid muscle or strap muscles, some­times required in extra-cervical approaches, affects functionality is not clear. Postoperatively, it may cause an uncomfortable catching sensa­tion on swallowing by adherence of skin or pla­tysma to the sternohyoid muscle.
Following extra-cervical techniques, patients suffer from moderate to severe pain, gradually subsiding within a week. Postoperative paresthe­sias or numbness generally subside within 6 months. A risk of subcutaneous hemorrhage without any evidence for increasing infection rates is present as a result of the extensive dissec­tion [102, 139144].
Anterior Chest/Breast Approach
In 1998, Shimizu etal. reported their experience of approaching the thyroid gland via the infra- clavicular incisions. It is termed video-assisted neck surgery [145]. The operation was aimed to be “scarless” over the neck. However, due to
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
422
M. Sakr
incomplete covering of the infra-clavicular scar by clothing and a high chance of scar hyper­trophic change, Ohgami etal. [102] modied the incision and placed it at the upper circum-areolar areas in 2000.
Technique: the initial incision is made at infra­clavicular or bilateral upper circum-areolar areas. The skin ap is raised by blunt dissection of sub­cutaneous (SC) tissue and the subplatysmal space. The operating space is maintained by a skin-lift­ing device (gasless) or CO2 insufation. An addi­tional port is inserted at the infra- clavicular region. The strap muscle is divided longitudinally to expose the thyroid gland. The rest of the proce­dure is similar to open thyroidectomy, with the dissection initiated from the inferior lobe pro­ceeding postero-laterally and then superiorly under the aim of endoscopic instruments. Individual vessels are controlled with ultrasonic shears and the whole course of the RLN is identi­ed and preserved. Despite good covering of the scars, some patients do not want any dissection around the nipple areolar region as the presence of a breast implant is a concern [146].
Park and coauthors [147] reported a series of 100 patients who underwent endoscopic thyroid­ectomy via the breast approach. Incisions were made in both upper circumareolar areas and SC tunnels were dissected up to the neck through which endoscopes were placed. CO2 insufation was used. The remaining dissection was carried out under visual endoscopic guidance. The inci­sions on the breast yielded a satisfactory cos­metic result with minimal scarring.
Trans-Axillary Approach
Trans-axillary approach offers good cosmesis as the axillary wound can be covered by the patient’s own clothes. It also avoids unnecessary dissec­tion around the areolar region. It was rst described by Ikeda etal. in 2000 [14].
Technique: The patient is put under general anesthesia and lies in a supine position. The neck is slightly extended, and the ipsilateral arm is raised and xed at the shortest distance between the axilla and anterior neck. A 4- to 6-cm vertical incision is made along the outer border of the pectoris major. The skin ap is raised supercial
to the pectoralis fascia and toward the anterior neck. The avascular plan between the sternal and clavicular head of SCM is developed. The ante­rior part of the thyroid is dissected free from strap muscles, and the skin ap is raised with a skin­lifting device. A 10-mm and a 5-mm trocars are placed on either end of the axillary wound. Another 5-mm trocar is placed in the chest. The inferior pole of the thyroid is carefully dissected to isolate the RLN and PTGs. Vessels are divided between clips or by ultrasonic shears. The thy­roid is then retracted medially. Berry’s ligament is dissected and divided. For hemi- thyroidectomy, the isthmus is transected using ultrasonic shears, while the medial approach for contralateral thy­roid would be needed if bilateral resection is indi­cated. The specimen is retrieved through the axillary wound and the operating eld is irri­gated. A drain is placed before wound closure. This approach avoids any scar over the neck. The distance between the incision and the thyroid is short and therefore less SC dissection is needed. However, contralateral dissection is difcult, and collision of instruments is common due to lim­ited working space.
Results/Outcome: In 2009, Kang et al. reported the results of 581 patients including 410 with cancer who underwent the gasless endo­scopic thyroidectomy [148]. The complication rates were not high; 3.2% of patients had tran­sient hypocalcemia, 1.5% had transient hoarse­ness, and 0.2% permanent RLN palsy. Compared to conventional approach, this approach took a longer time [149], and patients had more pain but were more satised [12]. On the other hand, some studies suggested that the trans-axillary approach might be associated with a higher rate of transient hypocalcemia and transient RLN palsy [150152]. In a patient with a low-risk pap­illary thyroid micro-carcinoma, Jeong et al. reported that trans-axillary thyroidectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection was feasible. Oncologically, though smaller numbers of LNs were retrieved than that of the conventional approach (5.05 vs 5.96, p=0.007), none of 275 patients who underwent trans-axillary approach had Tg>1ng/ml [153]. With application of the da Vinci roboticsystem and maturation of skills,
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14 Thyroidectomy Procedures
423
endoscopic approach on central and lateral neck dissection has largely shifted to the robotic approach [152154].
Further advances in trans-axillary approach have been proposed to optimize or maximize the cosmetic outcome of the wound. The presence of an anterior chest incision was associated with hypertrophic change or even keloid, especially in Asian patients. Surgeons from Korea proposed lowering the incisions and placing them at the peri-areolar site to decrease the “visibility” of the scar, namely the unilateral axillo-breast approach [155]. The central neck compartment and a tumor nodule 4cm could be tackled by this approach [155, 156]. On the other hand, a single-incision in the axilla was shown to be feasible [157, 158].
Axillo-Breast (Hybrid) Approach
In the anterior approach and the trans-axillary approach, the narrow endoscopic view and lim­ited angulation of instruction are the major tech­nical challenges for surgeons. To overcome these limitations, Shimazu etal. (2000) in Japan rst described using both axillary and breast incisions and the so-called “axillo-bilateral-breast approach” [159].
Technique: The patient is under general anes­thesia and the arms are abducted. An ipsilateral circum-areolar incision is made. The SC and sub­platysmal working space is developed with blunt dissection similar to the anterior chest/breast approach. The working space is extended to the level of the thyroid cartilage superiorly and the medial edge of SCM bilaterally. The working space is maintained with low-pressure CO2 insuf­ation. Additional ports are inserted through the ipsilateral axilla and the contralateral circum­areolar incision. The rest of the procedure is simi­lar to the anterior chest/breast approach. Through endoscopic instruments inserted into the axillary port, a wider triangulation facilitates dissection and mobilization of the thyroid gland. The resected thyroid gland is retrieved through the circum-areolar wound with a plastic bag.
Results: Choe etal. added another incision to the contralateral axilla, and this is now known as the “bilateral axillo-breast approach” (BABA)
[160]. From a large series of 512 patients with thyroidectomy via BABA, Choi et al. [161] reported a low rate of permanent hypocalcemia (4.2%) and RLN palsy (1.7%). However, the transient hypocalcemia rate (31.1%) and the pro­portion of transient RLN, palsy (20.1%) was rela­tively high compared to other reported series (~4%) [160]. This technique involves extensive SC ap dissection, so it is often criticized for being “maximally” invasive [161]. It results in upper chest discomfort, pain, and brosis of the skin ap and prolongs paraesthesia for up to 12–18 months [162]. Unlike the trans-axillary approach, the experience of BABA is reported mainly in Asian countries. We think that this might be related to better acceptance of the peri­areolar incision and extensive dissection over SC tissue over the breast. Furthermore, the larger- sized breasts commonly seen in the Caucasian population makes BABA more difcult.
Postauricular andAxillary Approach
To avoid dissection around the peri-areolar region and maintain triangulation of manipulation, Lee etal. [163] reported an approach via an incision at the bilateral axillary and postauricular region.
Technique: The operation starts with an infu­sion of a diluted adrenaline solution to the SC and subplatysmal space of the anterior chest and neck. After making a 12-mm incision at the ipsi­lateral axilla, the subcutaneous space is created with blunt dissection. A 12-mm trocar is inserted into the axillary wound and the operative space is inated with low pressure CO2. Another port is inserted into the contralateral axilla, and two 5-mm trocars are inserted through the bilateral postauricular incision. A midline incision is made, and the strap muscle is split and retracted laterally by the endoscopic instrument through postauricular ports. The thyroid is dissected and excised similar to the conventional anterior approach. It is a technically challenging opera­tion. Branches of the facial nerve were also sus­ceptible to traction injury. Even though it avoids peri-areolar dissection, this technique is not popular.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
424
M. Sakr
14.7.6.3 Other Novel Endoscopic Approaches
Other novel endoscopic approaches were mostly based on cadavers. These techniques included (1) retroauricular video-assisted
gasless thyroidectomy [164] and (2) totally trans-oral video- assisted thyroidectomy
(TOVAT) under gas insufations [165]. In 2008, the trans-oral access for endoscopic thy­roid resection was proposed by Witzel et al. [159].The concept of thyroid surgery, via a nat- ural orice and without any skin incision, may be appealing to most patients, but the invasive­ness and the potential complications of such access must be carefully evaluated by prior experimental studies [159].
In cadaver studies, it is feasible to excise the thyroid gland through an incision in the oor of the mouth under gas insufation. Two cases of trans-oral parathyroidectomy in 2 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism have been reported [166]. This approach seems to be technically fea­sible but is heavily criticized on its safety. The working space is very limited and potential infec­tion through a relatively contaminated incision is a major concern [167, 168].
scopic procedures such as reduced range of motion and impaired eye-hand coordination [169172]. Because of this, robotic thyroidec­tomy has become increasingly popular around the world [173175] attracting both surgeons and patients and allowing for the removal of thy­roid glands with a superior cosmetic result [171,
173, 176] when compared to the conventional
open thyroidectomy procedures. Many studies have described the safety of the remote- access robotic thyroidectomy procedures and have demonstrated comparable oncological outcomes between the robotic and open conventional thy­roidectomy [177180].
Since the initial trans-axillary approach, new approaches to robotic thyroidectomy have been developed, including retroauricular (aka “face- lift”), axillary-breast, and the latest approach; trans-oral [178, 181, 182]. There have also been descriptions of combinations and modications of these approaches [181]. Recently, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) stated that remote­access thyroidectomy may be performed safely in high-volume centers, acknowledging the role of robotic thyroidectomy in selected patients and emphasizing the importance of strict selection criteria [175].
14.8 Robotic Thyroidectomy
14.8.1 Development ofRobotic Thyroidectomy
Robotic thyroidectomy, a minimally invasive surgical technique, was developed in South Korea. It is also called “robot-assisted thyroid surgery,” or “robot-assisted endoscopic surgery”. It is the rst robot-assisted surgery done in the head and neck. The Da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California) was rst utilized for trans- axillary thyroidectomy by Chung in 2007. Chung and his colleagues have since performed over 5000 robotic trans-axillary thyroidectomy cases demonstrating the safety and feasibility of the robotic procedure for thy­roidectomy [169]. Using a robotic system helped to overcome some of the limitations of the endo-
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14.8.2 General Advantages andDisadvantages ofRobotic Thyroidectomy
14.8.2.1 Advantages inComparison
toOpen Surgery
– No incision in the neck. – Better view: The 3D camera gives a magnied
view in robotic thyroidectomy and enables the surgeon to look at the thyroid directly.
– Better identication of critical structures: Due
to the magnied 3D view, it is easier to iden­tify critical structures, such as the RLN and PTGs.
– Better dexterity in certain areas: The robotic
instruments give the surgeon a 6° freedom of motion, which enables easy manipulation dur­ing dissection.