Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_639_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
62 Мб
Скачать
122 Part II Abdominal Wall
51. Kouba EJ, Hubbard JS, Wallen E, Pruthi RS. Incisional hernia in a 12-mm nonbladed trocar site following laparoscopic nephrectomy. ScienticWorld- Journal. 2006;6:2399–2402.
52. Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Stees B, Swanstrom L, Way LW. A randomized prospec­tive study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:392–397.
53. Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf JS, Jr., Figenshau RS, McDougall EM, Clay­man RV. Comparative clinical study of port-closure techniques following laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:335–344.
54. Pringle JH, V. Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann Surg. 1908;48:541–549.
55. Halstead WS. Ligature and suture material: the employment of ne silk in preference to catgut and the advantages of transxing tissue and vessels in controlling hemorrhage—also an account of the introduction of gloves, gutta percha tissue and silver foil. JAMA. 1913:1119–1126.
56. Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM. Prospective evaluation of hemostatic techniques for liver injuries. J Trauma. 1976;16:442–451.
57. Calne RY, McMaster P, Pentlow BD. e treatment of major liver trauma by primary packing with transfer of the patient for denitive treatment. Br J Surg. 1979;66:338–339.
58. Svoboda JA, Peter ET, Dang CV, Parks SN, Ellyson JH. Severe liver trauma in the face of coagulopathy. A case for temporary packing and early reexploration. Am J Surg. 1982;144:717–721.
59. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:375–382; discussion 82–83.
60. Gracias VH, Braslow B, Johnson J, et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome in the open abdomen. Arch Surg. 2002;137:1298–1300.
61. Bee TK, Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, et al. Temporary abdominal closure techniques: a prospective randomized trial comparing polyglactin 910 mesh and vacuum-assisted closure. J Trauma. 2008;65:337–342; discussion 42–44.
62. Hermann RE, Flowers RS, Wasylenki EW. Early exposure in the management of the postoperative wound. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1965;120:503–506.
63. Law NW, Ellis H. Exposure of the wound–a safe economy in the NHS. Postgrad Med J. 1987;63:27–28.
64. Haley RW, Morgan WM, Culver DH, et al. Update from the SENIC project. Hospital infection control: recent progress and opportunities under prospective payment. Am J Infect Control. 1985;13:97–108.
65. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991;91:152S–157S.
66. Guenaga KK, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD001544.
67. Bucher P, Mermillod B, Gervaz P, Morel P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1359–1364; discussion 65.
68. Urschel JD. Necrotizing soft tissue infections. Postgrad Med J. 1999; 75:645–649.
69. McHenry CRC, C.N. Soft tissue infection. In: Malangoni MHS, N.J., ed. Problems in General Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins; 2002:7.
70. Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:705–710.
71. McHenry CR, Piotrowski JJ, Petrinic D, Malangoni MA. Determinants of mortality for necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Ann Surg. 1995;221:558–563; discussion 63–65.
72. Wall DB, Klein SR, Black S, de Virgilio C. A simple model to help distin­guish necrotizing fasciitis from nonnecrotizing soft tissue infection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:227–231.
73. Struk DW, Munk PL, Lee MJ, Ho SG, Worsley DF. Imaging of soft tissue infections. Radiol Clin North Am. 2001;39:277–303.
74. Brothers TE, Tagge DU, Stutley JE, Conway WF, Del Schutte H, Jr., Byrne TK. Magnetic resonance imaging dierentiates between necrotiz­ing and non-necrotizing fasciitis of the lower extremity. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:416–421.
75. Hopkins KL, Li KC, Bergman G. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal infectious processes. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:325–330.
76. Riseman JA, Zamboni WA, Curtis A, Graham DR, Konrad HR, Ross DS. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for necrotizing fasciitis reduces mortality and the need for debridements. Surgery. 1990;108:847–850.
77. Clark LA, Moon RE. Hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of life-threat­ening soft-tissue infections. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1999;5:203–219.
78. Bisno AL, Stevens DL. Streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:240–245.
79. Nurmohamed MT, Verhaeghe R, Haas S, et al. A comparative trial of a low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus standard heparin for the prophylaxis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in general surgery. Am J Surg. 1995;169:567–571.
80. Kakkar VV, Boeckl O, Boneu B, et al. Ecacy and safety of a low­ molecular-weight heparin and standard unfractionated heparin for pro­phylaxis of postoperative venous thromboembolism: European multicenter trial. World J Surg. 1997;21:2–8; discussion 9.
81. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. e search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:436–442.
82. Bucknell TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J. 1982;89:1350.
83. Webster C, Neumayer L, Smout R, et al. Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res. 2003;109:130–137.
84. Gislason H, Viste A. Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointes­tinal operations–comparison of dierent surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:958–961.
85. Pavlidis TE, Galatianos IN, Papaziogas BT, et al. Complete dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:351–354; discussion 5.
86. Schimp VL, Worley C, Brunello S, et al. Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of gynecologic oncology wound failures. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:586–591.

HERNIAS

Patrick J. Javid Jacob A. Greenberg
David C. Brooks
7
A hernia is de ned as an area of weakness or complete disruption of the  bromuscular tissues of the body wall. Structures arising from the cavity contained by the body wall can pass through, or herniate, through such a defect. While the de nition is straightforward, the terminology is often misrepresented. It should be clear that hernia refers to the actual anatomic weakness or defect, and hernia contents describe those structures that pass through the defect.
Hernias are among the oldest known a ictions of human­kind, and surgical repair of the inguinal hernia is the most common general surgery procedure performed today. Despite the high incidence, the technical aspects of hernia repair continue to evolve.
1
INGUINAL HERNIA
History
 e word “hernia” is derived from a Latin term meaning “arupture.”  e earliest reports of abdominal wall hernias date back to 1500 . During this early era, abdominal wall hernias were treated with trusses or bandage dressings.  e  rst evi­dence of operative repair of a groin hernia dates back to the  rst century .  e original hernia repairs involved wide operative exposures through scrotal incisions requiring orchiectomy on the involved side. Centuries later, around 700 , principles of operative hernia repair evolved to emphasize mass ligation and en bloc excision of the hernia sac, cord, and testis distal to the external ring.  e  rst report of groin hernia classi cation based on the anatomy of the defect (ie, inguinal versus femoral) dates back to the 14th century, and the anatomical descrip­tions of direct and indirect types of inguinal hernia were  rst reported in 1559.
Bassini revolutionized the surgical repair of the groin her­nia with his novel anatomical dissection and low recurrence rates. He  rst performed his operation in 1884, and pub­lished his initial outcomes in 1889. follow-up of patients over a 5-year period, with just  ve recurrences in over 250 patients.  is rate of recurrence was unheard of at the time and marked a distinct turning point
2
Bassini reported 100%
in the evolution of herniorraphy. Bassini’s repair emphasizes both the high ligation of the hernia sac in the internal ring, as well as suture reinforcement of the posterior inguinal canal.  e operation utilizes a deep and super cial closure of the inguinal canal. Inthe deep portion of the repair, the canal is repaired by interrupted sutures a xing the transversalis fas­cia medially to the inguinal ligament laterally.  is requires an incision through the transversalis fascia.  e super cial closure is provided by the external oblique fascia.
In addition to Bassini’s contributions, the  rst true Cooper’s ligament repair, which a xes the pectineal ligament to Poupart’s ligament and thereby repairs both inguinal and femoral hernia defects, was introduced by Lotheissen in 1898. McVay further popularized the Cooper’s ligament repair with the addition of a relaxing incision to reduce the increased wound tension.
 e advances in groin hernia repair in the century following Bassini have shared the primary goal of reducing long-term hernia recurrence rates. To this end, e orts have been directed at developing a repair that imparts the least tension on the tissues that are brought together to repair the hernia defect. Darn repairs were  rst introduced in the early 20th century to reduce wound tension by using either autologous tissue or synthetic suture to bridge the gap between fascial tissues. Muscle and fascial  aps were attempted without consistent success. In 1918, Handley introduced the  rst use of silk as a prosthetic darn and nylon followed several years later. How­ever, it was found that heavy prosthetic material increased the risk of wound infection, and the silk suture ultimately lost its strength over time.  e use of autologous or syn­thetic patches was also attempted in order to reduce wound tension and improve rates of recurrence.  e  rst patches, beginning in the early 20th century, consisted of silver wire  ligree sheets that were placed along the inguinal canal. Over time, the sheets su ered from metal fatigue leading to hernia recurrence. Reports of the wire patches eroding into adja­cent inguinal structures and even the peritoneal cavity itself caused even more concern with this technique.  e modern synthetic patch, made of a plastic mono lament polymer (polyethylene), was introduced by Usher in 1958. Lichten­stein, who developed a sutureless hernia repair using a plastic
123
124 Part II Abdominal Wall
mesh patch placed across the inguinal oor, further popular­ized this technique.
In the search for a technical means to reduce recurrence, emphasis was also placed on a meticulous dissection that would avoid placement of a prosthetic mesh. e most popular version was the Shouldice technique, initially intro­duced in 1958, and in essence a modication of the Bassini operation. is technique involves meticulous dissection of the entire inguinal oor and closure of the inguinal canal in four layers. e transversalis fascial layer itself is closed in two layers, as opposed to the single layer of interrupted suture advocated by Bassini. While the operation can be technically challenging to the beginner, it has been associated with excel­lent long-term outcomes and low recurrence rates.
Today, laparoscopic techniques have been validated as safe and eective in the treatment of groin hernias and have become commonplace. e laparoscopic approaches were initially developed in the early 1990s as laparoscopic techniques dif­fused throughout other specialties of general surgery.
Epidemiology
Seventy-ve percent of all abdominal wall hernias are found in the groin, making it the most common location for an abdominal wall hernia. Of all groin hernias, 95% are hernias of the inguinal canal with the remainder being femoral hernia defects. Inguinal hernias are nine times more common in men than in women. Although femoral hernias are found more often in women, the inguinal hernia is still the most common
3
hernia in women.
e overall lifetime risk of developing a groin hernia is approximately 15% in males and less than 5% in females. ere is clearly an association between age and hernia diagnosis. After an initial peak in the infant, groin her­nias become more prevalent with advancing age. In the same way, the complications of hernias (incarceration, strangula­tion, and bowel obstruction) are found more commonly at the extremes of age.
Currently in this country, approximately 700,000 operations
for inguinal hernia repair are performed annually.
4
Anatomic Classication
A thorough classication system has been developed to assist in the proper diagnosis and management of the inguinal hernia. All hernias can be broadly classied as congenital or acquired, and it is thought that the vast majority of inguinal hernias are congenital in nature. Acquired groin hernias develop after surgical incision and manipulation of the involved abdomi­nal wall tissues. Given the paucity of primary groin incisions utilized in modern general surgery, acquired hernias of the inguinal or femoral region are rare.
Inguinal hernias are further divided by anatomical location into direct and indirect types. is dierentiation is based on the location of the actual hernia defect in relation to the inferior epigastric vessels. e inferior epigastric vessels are
continuous with the superior epigastric vessels that originate from the internal mammary artery cephalad and ultimately course caudally into the common femoral artery and vein. ese vascular structures make up the lateral axis of Hessel­bach’s triangle, which includes the lateral border of the rectus sheath as its medial border and the inguinal (Poupart’s) liga­ment itself as the inferior border. Hernias that develop lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels are termed indirect inguinal hernias, and those that develop medial to the vessels are direct inguinal hernias. In this way, direct hernia defects are found within Hesselbach’s triangle. Hernias of the femoral type are located caudal or inferior to the inguinal ligament in a medial position.
e indirect inguinal hernia develops at the site of the internal ring, or the location where the spermatic cord in men and the round ligament in women enters the abdomen. While they may present at any age, indirect inguinal her­nias are thought to be congenital in etiology. e accepted hypothesis is that these hernias arise from the incomplete or defective obliteration of the processus vaginalis during the fetal period. e processus is the peritoneal layer that covers the testicle or ovary as it passes through the inguinal canal and into the scrotum in men or the broad ligament in women. e internal ring closes, and the processus vaginalis becomes obliterated following the migration of the testicle into the inguinal canal. e failure of this closure provides an environment for the indirect inguinal hernia to develop. In this way, the remnant layer of peritoneum forms a sac at the internal ring through which intra-abdominal contents may herniate, thereby resulting in a clinically detectable ingui­nal hernia. Anatomically, the internal ring is lateral to the external ring and the remainder of the inguinal canal, and this explains the lateral relationship of the indirect inguinal hernia to the inferior epigastric vessels. It is noteworthy that indirect inguinal hernia develops more frequently on the right, where descent of the gonads occurs later during fetal development.
Direct inguinal hernias, in contrast, are found medial to the inferior epigastric artery and vein, and within Hesselbach’s triangle. ese hernias are acquired and only rarely found in the youngest age groups. ey are thought to develop from an acquired weakness in the bromuscular structures of the inguinal oor, so that the abdominal wall in this region can no longer adequately contain the intra-abdominal contents. e exact relationship between direct inguinal hernias and heavy lifting or straining remains unclear, and some studies suggest that the incidence of direct hernia is no greater in people in professions that routinely involve heavy manual
5
labor.
While femoral hernias account for less than 10% of all groin hernias, their presentation can be more acute in nature. In fact, it is estimated that up to 40% of femoral hernias present as emer-
3
gencies with hernia incarceration or strangulation.
In this way, femoral hernias may also present with bowel obstruction. e empty space through which a femoral hernia forms is medial to the femoral vessels and nerve in the femoral canal and adjacent to the major femoral lymphatics. e inguinal ligament forms
Chapter 7 Hernias 125
the cephalad border of the empty space. However, while the empty space is inferior to the ligament, the herniated contents may present superior tothe ligament, thereby making an accu­rate diagnosis dicult.
Femoral hernias are much more common in females than in males, although inguinal hernias are still the most com­mon hernia in women. e predilection for femoral hernias in women may be secondary to less bulky groin musculature or weakness in the pelvic oor tissues from previous child­birth. It has been shown that previous inguinal hernia repair may be a risk factor for the subsequent development of a femoral hernia.
3
Anatomy of the Groin
e boundaries of the inguinal canal must be understood to comprehend the principles of hernia repair. In the inguinal canal, the anterior boundary is the external oblique aponeu­rosis; the posterior boundary is composed of the transversalis fascia with some contribution from the aponeurosis of the transversus abdominis muscle; the inferior border is imparted by the inguinal and lacunar ligaments; and the superior boundary is formed by the arching bers of the internal oblique musculature.
e internal (or deep) inguinal ring is formed by a normal defect in the transversalis fascia through which the spermatic cord in men and the round ligament in women pass into the abdomen from the extraperitoneal plane. e external (orsupercial) ring is inferior and medial to the internal ring and represents an opening of the aponeurosis of the exter­nal oblique. e spermatic cord passes from the peritoneum through the internal ring and then caudally into the external ring before entering the scrotum in males.
From supercial to deep, the surgeon rst encounters Scarpa’s fascia after incising the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Deep to Scarpa’s layer is the external oblique aponeu­rosis, which must be incised and spread to identify the cord structures. e inguinal ligament represents the inferior extension of the external oblique aponeurosis, and extends from the anterior superior iliac spine to the pubic tubercle. e medial extension of the external oblique aponeurosis forms the anterior rectus sheath. e iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves, which provide sensation to the skin, penis, and the upper medial thigh, lie deep to the exter­nal oblique aponeurosis in the groin region. e internal oblique aponeurosis is more prominent cephalad in the inguinal canal, and its bers form the superior border of the canal itself. e cremaster muscle, which envelops thecord structures, originates from the internal oblique musculature. e transversus abdominis muscle and its fascia represent thetrue oor of the inguinal canal. Deep to the oor isthe preperitoneal space, which houses the inferior epigastric artery and vein, the genitofemoral and lateral femoral cuta­neous nerves, and the vas deferens, which traverses this space to join the remaining cord structures at the internal inguinal ring.
Etiology
e indirect inguinal hernia, the most common form of groin hernia across all ages and both genders, is thought to be congenital in etiology. e processus vaginalis is the pocket of peritoneum that forms around the testicle as it descends through the internal ring and along the inguinal canal into the scrotum during the 28th week of gestation. e primary etiology behind the indirect inguinal hernia is believed to be a patent processus vaginalis, which in essence represents a hernia sac. In this way, the hernia defect is the internal ring itself, and the sac is preformed but never closes at the end of gestation. Once intra-abdominal contents nd their way into the sac, an indirect inguinal hernia is formed.
It is likely, however, that every person with a patent processus vaginalis does not develop an inguinal hernia during his or her lifetime. us, other predisposing factors must aid in indirect inguinal hernia formation. It is commonly thought that repeated increases in intra-abdominal pressure contribute to hernia formation; hence, inguinal hernias are commonly associated with pregnancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abdominal ascites, patients who undergo peritoneal dialysis, laborers who repeatedly ex the abdominal wall musculature, and individuals who strain from constipation. Itis also thought that collagen formation and structure dete­riorates with age, and thus hernia formation is more common in the older individual.
Several inborn errors of metabolism can lead to hernia formation. Specically, conditions such as Ehlers–Danlos syn­drome, Marfan’s syndrome, Hunter’s syndrome, and Hurler’s syndrome can predispose to defects in collagen formation. ere is evidence that cigarette smoking is associated with connective tissue disruption, and hernia formation is more common in the chronic smoker.
Clinical Manifestations
e groin hernia can present in a variety of ways, from the asymptomatic hernia to frank peritonitis in a strangulated hernia. Many hernias are found on routine physical examina­tion or on a focused examination for an unrelated complaint. ese groin hernias are usually fully reducible and chronic in nature. Such hernias are still referred for repair since they invariably develop symptoms, and asymptomatic hernias still have an inherent risk of incarceration and strangulation.
e most common presenting symptomatology for a groin hernia is a dull feeling of discomfort or heaviness in the groin region that is exacerbated by straining the abdominal musculature, lifting heavy objects, or defecating. ese maneu­vers worsen the feeling of discomfort by increasing the intra­ abdominal pressure and forcing the hernia contents through the hernia defect. Pain develops as a tight ring of fascia outlining the hernia defect compresses intra-abdominal structures with a visceral neuronal supply. With a reducible hernia, thefeeling of discomfort resolves as the pressure is released when the patient stops straining the abdominalmuscles. epain is often worse
126 Part II Abdominal Wall
at the end of the day, and patients in physically active profes­sions may experience the pain more often than those who lead a sedentary lifestyle.
Overwhelming or focal pain from a groin hernia is unusual and should raise the suspicion of hernia incarceration or strangulation. An incarcerated hernia occurs when the hernia contents are trapped in the hernia defect so that the contents cannot be reduced back into the abdominal cavity. e tight circumferential pressure applied by the hernia defect serves to impede the venous outow from the hernia contents, result­ing in congestion, edema, and tissue ischemia. Ultimately, the arterial inow to the hernia contents is compromised as well, resulting in tissue loss and necrosis, termed strangulation of the hernia.
All types of groin hernias are at risk for incarceration and strangulation, although the femoral hernia seems to be predis­posed to this complication. Incarceration and strangulation of a groin hernia may present as a bowel obstruction when the tight hernia defect constricts the lumen of the viscus. Hence, all patients presenting with bowel obstruction require a thor­ough physical examination of the groin region for inguinal and femoral hernias. If there is no bowel in the hernia sac, an incarcerated groin hernia may alternatively present as a hard, painful mass that is tender to palpation.
e physical examination diers between an incarcerated hernia and a strangulated hernia. e incarcerated hernia may be mildly tender due to venous congestion from the tight defect. e strangulated hernia will be tender and warm and may have surrounding skin erythema secondary to the inam­matory reaction from the ischemic bowel. e patient with the strangulated hernia may have a fever, hypotension from early bacteremia, and a leukocytosis. e incarcerated hernia requires operation on an urgent basis within 6–12 hours of presentation. If the operation is delayed for any reason, serial physical examinations are mandated to follow any change in the hernia site indicating the onset of tissue loss. e strangu­lated hernia clearly requires emergent operation immediately following diagnosis.
It may also be dicult to dierentiate fat from bowel contents in the hernia sac. It is important to recognize that incarcerated omental fat alone can produce signicant pain and tenderness on physical examination.
Pregnancy and Groin Hernia
Not surprisingly, groin hernias during pregnancy may become symptomatic. is is related to the increased intra-abdominal pressure from the growing fetus and enlarging uterus. e symptomatic groin discomfort may become positional later in pregnancy as the uterus shifts location with movement. While the risk of complications of groin hernias still exists during pregnancy, the enlarging uterus may in theory protect against incarceration by physically blocking the intra-abdominal con­tents from the inlet of the defect.
In general, elective repair of groin hernias during preg­nancy is not recommended, even if they become increasingly
symptomatic. Emergent repair of the incarcerated or strangu­lated hernia is undertaken as needed.
Physical Examination
As with any hernia, the groin hernia should be properly exam­ined with the patient in the standing position. is allows the hernia contents to ll the hernia sac and make the hernia obvious on physical examination. Some hernias, however, may be easily identiable in the supine position. It should be noted that the exact anatomical classication of the ingui­nal hernia (ie, indirect vs direct) is impossible to accurately predict based on physical examination alone.
In the male patient, using the second or third nger, the examiner should invaginate the scrotum near the external ring and direct the nger medial toward the pubic tuber­cle. e examiner’s nger will thus lie on the spermatic cord with the tip of the nger within the external ring. e patient is then asked to cough or perform a Valsalva maneuver. A true inguinal hernia will be felt as a silklike sensation against the gloved nger of the examiner. is is the infamous “silk glove” sign.
e female patient does not have the long and stretched spermatic cord to follow with the examiner’s nger during the physical examination. Instead, two ngers can be placed along the inguinal canal, and the patient is asked to cough or strain. If present, the examiner should feel the sensation of the hernia sac against the gloved nger. Particular attention in the female patient should be paid to the location of the sensation; femo­ral hernia sacs will present medial and just inferior to the lower border of the inguinal ligament.
While the physical examination does not dier in the infant, it can be more challenging to elicit the hernia impulse given the compressed groin anatomy of the young child. It is well known that a groin hernia can be more readily diagnosed in the infant who is actively crying and hence increasing the intra-abdominal pressure through exion of the abdominal wall musculature.
e examination for the femoral hernia in both genders involves palpation of the femoral canal just below the ingui­nal ligament in the upper thigh. In this way, the most easily palpable landmark is the femoral artery, which is located lat­eral in the canal. Medial to the femoral artery is the femoral vein, and the femoral empty space is just medial to the vein. is area can be located easily, palpated with two ngers, and then examined closely while the patient coughs or strains. In general, a focused groin hernia examination should involve the investigation for both inguinal and femoral hernias in both genders.
Treatment
e treatment of all hernias, regardless of their location or type, is surgical repair. Elective repair is performed to allevi­ate symptoms and to prevent the signicant complications
Chapter 7 Hernias 127
of hernias, such as incarceration or strangulation. While the limited data available on the natural history of groin hernias show that these complications are rare, the complications are associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality when they occur. At the same time, the risks of elective groin hernia repair, even in the patient with a complicated medical history, are exceedingly low. Outcomes of surgical repair are generally excellent with minimal morbidity and relatively rapid return to baseline health.
e major risk with delayed surgical repair is the risk of incarceration and/or strangulation. It is not possible to reliably identify those hernias that are at an increased risk for these complications. It is known that the risk of incarceration of a hernia is greatest soon after the hernia manifests itself. is is likely due to the fact that at the early stage of the hernia, the defect is small and ts tightly around the her­nia sac; therefore, any contents that ll the sac may quickly become trapped within the hernia. Over time, the hernia defect stretches due to the tissue that enters and leaves the sac with changes in intra-abdominal pressure. After 6 months, the risk of hernia incarceration decreases from 5% per year to 1–2% per year. In general, the larger the palpable defect on physical examination, the lower the risk of incarceration. Clearly, all risks of tissue loss aside, elective hernia repair is still preferred to emergent repair.
Anesthesia
Groin hernia repair can be performed using a variety of anesthesia options, including general, regional (such as spinal or epidural), and local anesthesia. require general anesthesia in order to provide the complete mus­cle relaxation needed to achieve insuation of the preperitoneal or peritoneal space.
Open groin hernia repairs are most often performed using either regional or local anesthesia. Local anesthesia with controlled intravenous sedation, referred to as moni­tored anesthesia care, is often preferred in the repair of the reducible inguinal hernia. Its advantages include the ease of induction and awakening, the short postanesthesia recovery period, and the fact that its intensity can easily be titrated up or down based on patient comfort levels intraoperatively. e only major disadvantage to this approach is in patients who experience considerable pain during repairs of large groin hernias.
In groin hernia repair, local anesthesia can be adminis­tered as a direct inltration of the tissues to be incised or as a local nerve block of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. e latter is associated with improved local pain con­trol, but may be dicult to achieve. e local nerve block also spares the soft tissue of edema from diuse inltration of local anesthesia.
Spinal or continuous epidural anesthesia allows the sur­geon greater freedom to maneuver within the operative eld since the anesthetized region is larger than in local anes­thesia. However, these modes of anesthesia carry their own
6
Laparoscopic repairs usually
infrequent risks such as urinary retention, prolonged anes­thetic eect, hypotension, and spinal headache. ey may also be associated with longer in-hospital recovery times on the day of surgery.
A randomized trial of local, regional, and general anesthesia in 616 adult patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair in 10 hospitals found that local anesthesia was
7
superior in the early postoperative period.
Compared to those who received regional or general anesthesia, patients who received local anesthesia had less postoperative pain and nausea, shorter time spent in the hospital, and fewer unplanned overnight admissions (3% vs 14% and 22%, respectively).
Operative Techniques
Successful surgical repair of a hernia depends on a tension­free closure of the hernia defect to attain the lowest possible recurrence rate. Previous eorts to simply identify the defect and suture it closed resulted in unacceptably high recurrence rates of up to 15%. Modern techniques have improved upon this recurrence rate by placement of mesh over the hernia defect, or in the case of laparoscopic repair, behind the her­nia defect. One exception to this rule is the classic Shouldice repair, which uses meticulous dissection and closure without mesh placement to obtain a consistently low recurrence rate. Another benet of the tension-free closure is that it has been shown to cause the patient signicantly less pain and discom­fort in the short-term postoperative period.
Figure 7-1 illustrates the essential steps to the modern open inguinal hernia repair. All of the open anterior herniorraphy techniques begin with a transversely oriented, slightly curvi­linear skin incision of approximately 6–8 cm positioned one to two ngerbreadths above the inguinal ligament. Dissection is carried down through the subcutaneous and Scarpa’s layers. e external oblique aponeurosis is identied and cleaned so that the external ring is identied inferomedially. Being careful to avoid injury to the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves, the aponeurosis is incised sharply and opened along its length through the external ring with ne scissors. e nerves underlying the external oblique fascia are then identi­ed and isolated for protection. e soft tissue is cleared o the posterior surface of the external oblique aponeurosis on both sides and the spermatic cord is mobilized. Using a com­bination of blunt and sharp dissection, the cremaster muscle bers enveloping the cord are separated from the cord struc­tures and the cord itself is isolated. At this point, it is possible to accurately dene the anatomy of the hernia. An indirect hernia will present with a sac attached to the cord in an anter­omedial position extending superiorly through the internal ring. A direct inguinal hernia will present as a weakness in the oor of the canal posterior to the cord. A pantaloon defect will present as both a direct and an indirect defect in the same inguinal canal.
e specics of the common modern techniques for hernia repair will be discussed further.
128 Part II Abdominal Wall
A
C
B
D
E
F
FIGURE 7-1 Adult hernia incision and dissection. A. Transverse incision. B. Curved skin crease incision. C. e aponeurosis of the
external oblique is incised along the direction of its bers. D. e inguinal canal is exposed and the spermatic cord mobilized. E. e spermatic cord has been skeletonized, and the internal ring and posterior wall of the canal (the transversalis fascia) have been dened. F. A medium-sized sac has been dissected free of the cord elements.
Chapter 7 Hernias 129
G
I
FIGURE 7-1 Continued—G. e sac has been invaginated. H. A long or complete sac is being dissected free close to the internal ring. I.
e sac has been transected.
THE SHOULDICE TECHNIQUE
e Shouldice technique is commonly used for open repair of inguinal hernias and is the most popular pure tissue hernia repair. It is in essence the modern evolution of the Bassini repair performed in a multilayered fashion. Both operations use a tightening of the internal ring and closure of the trans­versalis fascia to the inguinal ligament as their primary tenets of hernia repair.
8
Figure 7-2 illustrates the basic steps in the Shouldice repair. After suitable exposure and isolation of the cord, a pair of scissors is passed posterior to the transversalis fascia beginning at the medial pillar of the internal ring and extending infero­medially to the pubic tubercle. In this way, the transversalis fascia is separated from the preperitoneal fat plane. Care must be taken at this stage to preserve the inferior epigastric vessels that reside in the preperitoneal space. e transversalis fascia is then opened with scissors along the entire inguinal oor
H
from internal ring to pubic tubercle, and the posterior sur­face of the transversalis is cleaned of its preperitoneal attach­ments. As the rst layer of the repair, the free edge of the lower transversalis ap is sutured in a continuous, imbricated fashion behind the upper ap to the posterior surface of the upper transversalis fascia and the lateral component of the posterior rectus sheath. is running suture layer is started medially at the pubic tubercle and carried up to and through the internal ring, thereby tightening the transversalis fascia around the cord at its entrance to the inguinal canal. e rst layer is not tied but continued in a running fashion from lateral to medial as a second layer closing the upper transver­salis ap to the base of the lower edge as well as the inguinal ligament. is second layer progresses medially to the pubic tubercle where it is tied to the original tail that started the rst layer. e third layer of continuous suture starts at the tight­ened internal ring and brings together the conjoined tendon (the internal oblique and transversus abdominis aponeuroses)
A
B
C
E
D
F
G
FIGURE 7-2 e Shouldice operation. A. e transversalis fascia is being incised. B. e upper and lower aps of the transversalis fascia have
been dissected free and elevated to expose the extraperitoneal fat and the inferior epigastric vessels. C. e rst layer of the Shouldice operation. D. e second layer. E. e third layer. F. e fourth layer. G. e external oblique aponeurosis has been repaired anterior to the spermatic cord.
130
Chapter 7 Hernias 131
medially with the inguinal ligament laterally. is layer is run down to the pubic tubercle, and returns to the internal ring as the fourth layer including the anterior rectus sheath medially with the posterior aspect of the external oblique aponeurosis laterally. e cord can now be relaxed gently on the new inguinal oor, and the external oblique aponeurosis is closed in one to two additional continuous layers extending down to the external ring to reapproximate this structure. e original descriptions of the operation by Shouldice used continuous stainless steel wire suture for all four layers of repair, although surgeons commonly use permanent synthetic suture today.
e Shouldice Hospital reports excellent long-term out­comes from their operation with recurrence rates less than 1%
9,10
in selected patients.
ese results have not been achieved with any other pure tissue technique. e operation is well tolerated by most patients using local anesthesia only. From the multiple, overlapping, continuous suture lines, Shouldice proponents argue that any tension brought about in this type of closure is dispersed throughout the entire inguinal canal. e dissection is complicated, however, and requires excellent surgical technique and anatomic awareness. Moreover, other surgeons utilizing the Shouldice method have not achieved recurrence rates this low. us, the low rate of recurrence associated with the Shouldice technique likely depends on the level of surgical expertise and the patient selection. In one report of 183 inguinal hernia repairs using the Shoul­dice technique under local anesthesia, the recurrence rates for beginners versus more experienced surgeons were 9.4% versus 2.5%, respectively.
11
A recent meta-analysis conducted by the Cochrane
Collaboration compared the Shouldice technique with other
12
open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.
e analysis incorporated results from 16 dierent randomized or quasi­randomized studies and compared 2566 hernias repaired via the Shouldice technique with 1121 hernias repaired with mesh and 1608 hernias repaired with other nonmesh techniques. e recurrence rate for the Shouldice repair was signicantly higher than mesh repair (odds ratio 3.8), but signicantly lower than nonmesh repair (Odds Ratio 0.62). ere were no signicant dierences between the groups with respect to complications, length of stay, or chronic pain following
12
herniorraphy.
us, the Shouldice technique is associated with a higher recurrence rate than mesh repairs, but appears to be the repair of choice in situations where mesh cannot be implanted.
THE COOPER LIGAMENT REPAIR
e Cooper ligament repair is the only technique that deni­tively repairs both the inguinal and femoral hernia defects in the groin. e operation is often named after Chester McVay, who popularized the operation in the 1940s and introduced the concept of the relaxing incision to decrease the tension from the repair. e repair is also a primary tissue repair in that no mesh is utilized.
e Cooper ligament repair begins similar to the Shouldice
procedure, and exposure and isolation of the cord is performed.
e transversalis fascia is then opened and cleaned posteriorly. At this time, Cooper’s ligament is identied and dissected free of its brous and fatty attachments. e defects are repaired by using interrupted suture to ax the upper border of the transversalis fascia to Cooper’s ligament beginning medially at the pubic tubercle and continuing until the femoral sheath is reached. At this point, the femoral canal is closed by carefully suturing Cooper’s ligament to the femoral sheath. e repair is continued with interrupted sutures between the transver­salis fascia and the iliopubic tract laterally until the entrance point of the cord is reached. In this way, the closure creates a new, and tighter, internal inguinal ring around the cord.
e Cooper ligament repair requires a relaxing incision because this pure tissue repair is associated with signi­cant tension in closing all three groin hernia defects. After the transversalis fascia has been mobilized, and prior to the closure of the fascia to Cooper’s ligament, a 2–4 cm vertical incision is made at the lateral border of the anterior rectus sheath beginning at the pubic tubercle and extending supe­riorly. e relaxing incision can be left open since the rectus muscle should protect against any herniation; alternatively, some surgeons argue for placement of a mesh over the relaxing incision since hernia formation can occur at this site.
e Cooper ligament repair is an outstanding technique for a femoral hernia and is associated with excellent long-term results in experienced hands. Disadvantages of the repair include a longer operating time, a more extensive dissection, the potential for vascular injury and thromboembolic complications from the femoral vessels, and a longer postop­erative recovery phase.
Prosthetic Repairs
Polypropylene mesh is the most common prosthetic used today in mesh repairs of the inguinal hernia. e two most common prosthetic repairs are the Lichtenstein and patch” repair as described by Gilbert by Rutkow and Robbins.
15
e type of mesh to be used during prosthetic inguinal hernia repairs deserves a brief discussion. e most common and preferred mesh for groin hernia repair is a polypropylene woven mesh marketed under a variety of names. Polypropylene is preferred because it allows for a brotic reaction to occur between the inguinal oor and the posterior surface of the mesh, thereby forming scar and strengthening the closure of the hernia defect. is brotic reaction is not seen to the same extent with other varieties of prosthetic, namely expanded polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE) mesh. PTFE is often used for repair of ventral or incision hernias in which the brotic reac­tion with the underlying serosal surface of the bowel is best avoided.
ere are limited prospective, randomized data comparing the recurrence rate of open prosthetic repairs versus open nonprosthetic repairs. An attempted meta-analysis concluded that mesh repair was associated with fewer overall recurrences, although the authors report that formal analysis was limited
13
and the “plug
14
and popularized