Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_639_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
62 Мб
Скачать
142 Part II Abdominal Wall
against herniation of intra-abdominal contents through defects in the midline fascia. A paraumbilical hernia is an epigastric hernia that borders on the umbilicus.
History
e epigastric hernia was rst described by Villeneuve in 1285, but the term “epigastric hernia” was only rst used to describe this condition in 1812 by Leville. e rst suc­cessful repair of an epigastric hernia was reported in 1802 by Maunior.
Incidence
Estimates of the frequency of epigastric hernia in the gen­eral population range from 3% to 5%. It is most commonly diagnosed in middle age, and congenital epigastric hernias are uncommon. e condition is more common in males by a ratio of 3:1. Twenty percent of epigastric hernias may be multiple, although most are associated with one dominant defect.
Anatomy and Etiology
e cause of epigastric hernia is largely unknown. Since the condition does not predominate in children, it is unlikely that the defect is entirely congenital in origin. Rather, the hernia is likely the result of multiple factors, such as a congen­itally weakened linea alba from a lack of decussating midline bers and subsequent increase in intra-abdominal pressure, surrounding muscle weakness, or chronic abdominal wall strain.
e midline defect is usually elliptical in nature, with the long axis oriented transversely. e width of the defect is generally a few millimeters to several centimeters, and larger defects are rare. In most cases, the hernia is lled by a small amount of preperitoneal fat only and no peri­toneal sac is present. e hernia will often not be seen on laparoscopy owing to the lack of peritoneal involvement through the hernia defect. Epigastric hernias that involve a peritoneal sac usually contain only omentum and rarely small intestine.
Clinical Manifestations
Epigastric hernia is often asymptomatic and represents a chance nding on physical examination. Patients with symptomatic hernias complain of vague abdominal pain above the umbilicus that is exacerbated with standing or coughing and relieved in the supine position. Severe pain may be secondary to incarcera­tion or strangulation of preperitoneal fat or omentum. Bowel strangulation in epigastric hernias is a rare nding.
On examination, the hernia is diagnosed by palpating a small, soft, reducible mass in the midline superior to the umbilicus. e mass may protrude with a Valsalva maneu­ver or with standing. Palpation can be especially dicult in the obese patient. Rarely, imaging is needed to conrm the diagnosis, and computed tomography of the abdomen is the preferred technique.
Treatment
As illustrated in Fig. 7-9, operative repair of the epigastric hernia can most often be performed as a day-surgery pro­cedure under local anesthesia. General anesthesia should be reserved for the complicated patient, a very large her­nia, or the pediatric population. e herniated contents are exposed through a small midline vertical or transverse inci­sion. e defect in the linea alba and the surrounding fascia are cleared of subcutaneous fat. Eort is made to identify a peritoneal sac protruding through the defect. If identied, a small sac can be simply inverted back within the abdominal cavity. Alternatively, a larger sac can be opened, its contents reduced, and any excess peritoneum excised. It is usually not necessary to perform formal closure of the peritoneal sac. e defect is then closed transversely with a few interrupted sutures of polypropylene or nylon, taking generous bites of surrounding fascia.
is repair usually suces with minimal recurrence. In general, it is not necessary to reconstruct the linea alba for a single epigastric hernia. Most patients will not develop a subsequent epigastric hernia at a separate site, and repair of an epigastric hernia is a minor ambulatory procedure that can be repeated easily if necessary.
OBTURATOR HERNIA
An obturator hernia is one of the rarest forms of hernia, and most surgeons will see few in an entire career. An obturator hernia occurs when there is protrusion of intra-abdominal contents through the obturator foramen in the pelvis.
Incidence
e true incidence of obturator hernia is unknown. e largest reported series includes only 43 patients diagnosed with obturator hernia over a 30-year period. that less than 1% of mechanical bowel obstructions arise from strangulated obturator hernias. e hernia is much more common in females, with a female:male ratio of 6:1. e gender discrepancy is often explained by dierences in female pelvic anatomy, including a broader pelvis, a wide obturator canal, and the increase in pelvic diameter brought about by pregnancy. Most cases of obturator hernia present in the seventh and eighth decades, and this condition is clearly
34
It is thought
Chapter 7 Hernias 143
C
A
D
B
E
F
FIGURE 7-9 Repair of the epigastric hernia. A. e elliptical opening. B. e diamond-shaped opening. C. e small empty sac. D. Herniated
fat exposed during dissection. E. Herniated fat and the sac have been excised. F. Repair of continuous suture technique. G. Repair using interrupted sutures.
associated with advanced age. Bilateral obturator hernias have been reported in 6% of cases.
G
obturator canal are the obturator groove on the superior pubic ramus superiorly and the upper edge of the obtura­tor membrane inferiorly. e canal is approximately 3 cm in length, and the obturator vessels and nerve lie postero-
Anatomy
lateral to the hernia sac in the canal. e hernia sac usually takes the shape of the canal so that it is long and narrow
e obturator foramen is formed by the ischial and pubic rami (Fig. 7-10). e obturator membrane covers the majority of the foramen space, except for a small portion through which the obturator vessels and nerve pass. ese vessels traverse the canal to leave the abdominal cavity and enter the medial aspect of the thigh. e boundaries of the
before ballooning in the upper thigh. e hernia lies deep to the pectineus muscle and therefore is dicult to palpate on examination. Small bowel is the most likely intra-abdominal organ to be found in an obturator hernia, although rare cases have been reported of the appendix, Meckel’s diverticulum, omentum, bladder, and ovary incarcerated in the hernia.
144 Part II Abdominal Wall
FIGURE 7-10 e direction of the obturator hernia through the
obturator canal.
Clinical Manifestations
Obturator hernia is associated with four cardinal ndings that assist in the dicult diagnosis. Rarely do all four physical nd­ings occur together. e most common clinical manifestation is intestinal obstruction, which occurs in over 80% of patients. is is often in the form of acute obstruction secondary to
35
hernia strangulation.
e second most common nding is the Howship–Romberg sign, seen in about one-half of patients with obturator hernia. With this sign, patients characteristically complain of pain along the medial surface of the thigh that may radiate to the knee and hip joints. e nding is likely associ­ated with compression of the obturator nerve between the canal and the hernia sac. e adductor reex in the thigh may also be weakened or lost secondary to motor dysfunction from an entrapped obturator nerve. e third nding, observed in 30% of patients, is a history of repeated episodes of bowel obstruc­tion that pass quickly and without intervention. is is likely due to periodic incarceration of the hernia sac in the obturator canal. Finally, a fourth nding is a palpable mass in the proxi­mal medial aspect of the thigh at the origin of the adductor muscles. e palpable mass is only found in an estimated 20% of patients with obturator hernia. e mass is best palpated with the thigh exed, abducted, and rotated outward.
In rare cases, ecchymoses may be noted in the upper medial thigh due to eusion from the strangulated hernia contents. e obturator hernia mass may also be palpated laterally on a vaginal examination.
Treatment
e only treatment for obturator hernia is surgical repair. All obturator hernias should be operated on soon after diagnosis given the high risk for bowel incarceration and strangulation.
ere is no role for conservative management given the location of the hernia and the fact that the strangulated obtu­rator hernia is dicult to diagnose. A preoperative diagnosis of obturator hernia is rare indeed, and a diagnosis prior to presentation with bowel obstruction is even more uncom­mon. e typical case of obturator hernia presents as an acute small bowel obstruction with evidence of ischemic bowel on examination, laboratory analyses, or imaging. erefore, obturator hernia repair is often performed as a surgical emer­gency via a midline laparotomy.
ere are three general operative approaches for obtura­tor hernia repair: the lower midline transperitoneal approach, the lower midline extraperitoneal approach, and the anterior thigh exposure.
e lower midline transperitoneal approach is the most common method for repair of obturator hernias since most cases are encountered unexpectedly during exploratory lapa­rotomy for small bowel obstruction of unknown etiology. Following laparotomy, the dilated small bowel is run deep into the pelvis where it is found to enter the obturator canal alongside the obturator vessels and nerve. A careful attempt should be made to reduce the incarcerated bowel with gentle traction. is maneuver may be augmented by palpation on the medial inner thigh to push the hernia sac into the abdominal cavity from the outside. is is dicult to perform without assistance since the thigh is rarely sterilely prepared for the exploratory laparotomy unless a preoperative diagno­sis of obturator hernia has been made. e pelvic side of the obturator canal has a rigid opening that cannot be digitally dilated, making reduction of the hernia sac more dicult. If traction alone does not allow reduction of the bowel, the obturator membrane can be carefully incised from anterior to posterior to facilitate exposure. Care should be taken to avoid injury to both the incarcerated bowel and the obtu­rator vessels. If these maneuvers are unsuccessful, a counter incision can be made in the medial groin to facilitate reduc­tion from both sides of the canal. Once the hernia has been reduced, the intestine is assessed for viability and resected as needed. e hernia opening is then closed around the obtu­rator vessels with a running layer of polypropylene or nylon suture applied in the thin layer of fascia that encircles the inner circumference of the canal. Alternatively, in a clean case without bowel contamination, a piece of mesh can be placed over the obturator foramen. Some hernia surgeons suture the mesh to Cooper’s ligament to avoid migration.
e midline extraperitoneal approach is used when the diagnosis of obturator hernia has been made preoperatively. It allows complete exposure of the opening of the obturator canal. e incision is made in the midline from the umbili­cus to the pubis. e preperitoneal plane is entered deep to the rectus muscle, and the bladder is peeled from the perito­neum. e space is opened so that the superior pubic ramus and the obturator internus muscle are exposed. e hernia sac is seen as a projection of peritoneum passing inferiorly into the obturator canal. e sac is incised at the base, the con­tents are reduced, and the neck of the sac is transected. Any remaining distal sac in the canal is extracted by traction or
Chapter 7 Hernias 145
tomographic imaging techniques. Recurrence rates are low in published series, although long-term follow-up has proved dicult in this patient population.
PERINEAL HERNIAS
Hernias of the perineum are rare and composed of protru­sions of the intra-abdominal contents through a weakened pelvic oor. ey may also be termed pelvic hernias, ischi­orectal hernias, pudendal hernias, subpubic hernias, or her­nias of the pouch of Douglas. Perineal hernias should be dierentiated from the more common rectocele or cystocele, which are related to pelvic oor relaxation, most often from childbirth, and do not represent true hernias.
Primary perineal hernias are extremely rare. e rst reported case was by Scarpa in 1821. Secondary, or postoper-
FIGURE 7-11 e thigh approach for repair of the obturator hernia.
with long forceps. e internal opening to the obturator canal is closed with a continuous suture as described above. e bites of tissue should include the periosteum of the superior pubic ramus and the fascia on the internal obturator muscle. Care must be exercised at all times to avoid injury to the obtu­rator vessels and nerve that run alongside the hernia defect. In addition to or in place of the suture closure of the obturator defect, preperitoneal mesh placement has been described to cover the defect.
e thigh approach begins with a vertical incision in the upper medial thigh placed along the adductor longus muscle (Fig. 7-11). e muscle is retracted medially to expose thepectineus muscle, which is cut across its width to expose the sac. e sac is carefully incised, the contents inspected and reduced if viable, and the sac is excised. e hernial opening is closed with a continuous suture layer. If the bowel contents within the hernia sac do not appear viable, it is dicult to perform an adequate small bowel resection through the thigh incision and therefore midline laparotomy is usually performed.
Laparoscopic transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches have been recently described for obturator hernia repair withplacement of prosthetic mesh to close the obturator opening.
36
Results
Mortality after obturator hernia repair has been much higher than with other hernias because it is associated with acute bowel obstruction in an elderly population with multiple comorbidities. Recent data show a mortality of less than 5% and a 25% incidence of small bowel resection during obturator hernia repair. et in accuracy in the modern era aorded by computed
34
ese reports emphasize the ben-
ative, perineal hernias are more commonly seen and occur in patients status postabdominoperineal resection in which the pelvic musculature is dissected to resect the distal rectum.
Etiology
Primary perineal hernias occur in the older population, usually between the fth and seventh decades of life. ey are at least ve times more common in women than in men, and this is thought to be associated with the broader pelvic oor in the female and long-term eects of pregnancy and childbirth. Fac­tors that may predispose to a primary perineal hernia include a deep or elongated pouch of Douglas, obesity, chronic ascites, history of pelvic infection, and obstetric trauma.
Postoperative perineal hernia may occur in patients who have undergone abdominoperineal resection or pelvic exen­teration. It is thought to form as a result of excision of the levator ani musculature and its surrounding fascia with incomplete repair of the pelvic oor. An excision of the coc­cyx is thought to be an additional aggravating factor in hernia formation. As in primary perineal hernias, women are aected more often than men. e condition, while more common than the primary perineal hernia, remains rare.
Anatomy
e pelvic oor is formed by the levator ani and iliococcy­geus muscles and their fascia. e pelvic outlet is bounded by the pubic symphysis and the subpubic ligament anteri­orly, the pubic rami and ischial tuberosities laterally, and the coccyx and sacrotuberous ligaments posteriorly. e outlet is divided into anterior and posterior divisions by the super­cial transversus perinei muscles. e anterior space is termed the urogenital triangle, and the posterior space is termed the ischiorectal fossa. Anterior and posterior perineal hernias are named according to the location of the hernia defect and sub­sequent sac protrusion, as shown in Fig. 7-12.
146 Part II Abdominal Wall
FIGURE 7-12 e anatomy of the perineal hernia showing the
location of both anterior and posterior defects.
e anterior perineal hernia occurs almost exclusively in women. e sac enters in front of the broad ligament and lateral to the bladder, emerging anterior to the transversus perinei musculature. e sac may pass between the ischio­pubic bone and the vagina, thereby producing a swelling in the posterior portion of the labia majus. Posterior perineal hernias are found in both genders but remain more com­mon in women. In men, the hernia sac emerges between the bladder and the rectum to present as a bulge in the perineum. In women, the hernia enters between the rectum and the uterus to pass posteriorly to the broad ligament. In this space, the hernia can push forward to present as a bulge in the posterior vagina or emerge posteriorly into the rectum. e hernia can pass through the levator ani muscle or between it and the iliococcygeus muscle. A lat­eral pelvic hernia may occur through the hiatus of Schwalbe when the levator ani muscle is not rmly attached to the internal obturator fascia. is type of perineal hernia can present anteriorly in the labium majus or posteriorly in the ischiorectal fossa.
Clinical Manifestations
e patient with a perineal hernia most often complains of a soft protuberance that is reduced in the recumbent position. In cases of anterior perineal hernia, minor urinary retention or discomfort may be reported. A soft bulge may be noted in the posterior vagina or the labia, thereby interfering with labor or intercourse. In posterior perineal hernias, the patient may describe a mass protruding between the gluteus muscles, thereby making sitting dicult after the hernia has emerged in a standing position. e patient may rarely
complain of constipation or the feeling of incomplete def­ecation.
In general, symptoms from a perineal hernia are mild, and strangulation is rare since the hernia defect in the pelvic oor is large and surrounded by soft tissue and atrophied musculature. Rectal prolapse may be confused with a pos­terior perineal hernia, although the two can exist concomi­tantly. e perineal hernia, even when the defect involves the posterior pelvic oor, will present as a bulge anterior to the prolapsed rectum.
Treatment
ree options for repair of the perineal hernia exist including the transperitoneal, perineal, and the combined approaches. e transperitoneal approach is the preferred method for complete repair. In this technique, a lower midline abdominal incision is performed and the bowel retracted out of the pelvis with the patient in the Trendelenburg position. A defect in the muscular lining of the pelvic oor will be noted, and any remaining bowel in the defect can usually be easily reduced. e sac is everted and excess sac tissue can be excised. While small defects in the pelvic oor can be closed with interrupted sutures of nylon or polypropylene, this is usually not an ade­quate repair given the poor strength of the atrophied tissue that often surrounds the hernia defect. erefore, a repair with a large piece of nonabsorbable mesh is preferred and is usually tacked down to the pelvic oor tissues with inter­rupted nonabsorbable monolament sutures.
e perineal approach to hernia repair is more direct and avoids a laparotomy but suers from inadequate exposure of the actual hernia defect. In this technique, a transverse or lon­gitudinal incision is made directly over the site of the hernia bulge. e sac is identied and dissected free of its attach­ments to the surrounding pelvic musculature and fascia. e sac is then excised and its contents are reduced within the abdominal cavity. e defect is repaired with interrupted non­absorbable suture, as the exposure is usually not wide enough for proper placement of mesh. While this approach may be suitable for a small hernia defect in an unhealthy patient, the risk of recurrence is high.
In extraordinary cases in which the hernia contents can­not be reduced during a transperitoneal repair, a combined approach with dissection from the perineum can be consid­ered. e actual repair of the hernia defect should take place from within the abdomen to obtain optimal exposure and facilitate placement of mesh to reinforce the closure.
Postoperative perineal hernia repairs may also be repaired by either a transperitoneal or perineal approach. However, the transperitoneal approach is preferred in this scenario, as the hernia contents may be dicult to completely reduce secondary to postoperative adhesion formation. In addition, given the previous operative dissection, the pelvic oor is already weakened and mesh placement is often necessary to achieve an adequate, tension­free closure of the defect.
Chapter 7 Hernias 147
SPIGELIAN HERNIA
A spigelian hernia occurs along the semilunar line, which traverses a vertical space along the lateral rectus border from the costal margin to the pubic symphysis. Adriaan van der Spieghel (1578–1625), a pupil of Fabricius of Padua and a professor of anatomy and surgery, was the rst to accu­rately describe the semilunar line. He described the spigelian fascia as the aponeurotic structure between the transversus abdominis muscle laterally and the posterior rectus sheath medially. is fascia is what makes up the semilunar line, and it is through this fascial layer that a spigelian hernia forms.
Spigelian hernia is well described, and almost 1000 cases have been reported in the medical literature. It is likely that more of these hernias will be diagnosed, as the spigelian her­nia is readily seen on computed tomography scans as well as laparoscopic views of the anterior abdominal wall.
Anatomy
In practice, the semilunar line is taken as the lateral border of the rectus sheath. Spieghel originally intended this structure to represent the line of transition from the muscular bers of the transversus abdominis muscle to the posterior aponeurosis of the rectus. e semilunar line runs from the ninth rib cartilage superiorly to the pubic tubercle inferiorly. e spigelian fascia varies in width along the semilunar line, and it gets wider as it approaches the umbilicus. e widest portion of the spigelian fascia is the area where the semilunar line intersects the arcuate line of Douglas (the linea semicircularis; Fig. 7-13). It is in this
region, between the umbilicus and the arcuate line, where more
37
than 90% of spigelian hernias are found.
It is thought that since the spigelian fascia is widest at this point, it is also weak­est in this region. Below the arcuate line, all of the transversus abdominis aponeurotic bers pass anterior to the rectus mus­cle to contribute to the anterior rectus sheath, and there is no posterior component of the rectus sheath. e rearrangement of muscle and fascial bers at the intersection of the arcuate and semilunar lines is thought to cause an area of functional weakness that is predisposed to hernia formation. Hernias at the upper extremes of the semilunar line are rare and usually not true spigelian hernias since there is little spigelian fascia in these regions.
As the hernia develops, preperitoneal fat emerges through the defect in the spigelian fascia bringing an exten­sion of the peritoneum with it (Fig. 7-14). e hernia usu­ally meets resistance from the external oblique aponeurosis, which is intact and does not undergo rearrangement of
A
FIGURE 7-13 Anatomy of the spigelian hernia and the sites of most
common occurrence.
B
C
D
FIGURE 7-14 e spigelian hernia. A. Breaching the spigelian
fascia. B. e most common type has passed through the transversus abdominis and the internal oblique aponeuroses and is spreading out in the interstitial layer posterior to the external oblique aponeurosis. C. e less common type in the interstitial layer between the transversus abdominis aponeurosis and the internal oblique muscle. D. e least common subcutaneous type.
148 Part II Abdominal Wall
its aponeurotic bers at the arcuate line. For this reason, almost all spigelian hernias are interparietal in nature, and only rarely will the hernia sac lie in the subcutaneous tissues anterior to the external oblique fascia. is fact makes the accurate diagnosis of spigelian hernias more challenging. e hernia also cannot develop medially due to resistance from the intact rectus muscle and sheath. erefore, a large spigelian hernia is most often found lateral and inferior to its defect in the space directly posterior to the external oblique muscle.
Clinical Manifestations
e patient most often presents with a swelling in the middle to lower abdomen just lateral to the rectus muscle. e patient may complain of a sharp pain or tenderness at this site. e hernia is usually reducible in the supine position. However, up to 20% of spigelian hernias will present incarcerated, and for this reason operative repair is mandatory once the hernia is conrmed on diagnosis. e reducible mass may be palpable, even if it sits below the external oblique musculature.
When the diagnosis is unclear, radiologic imaging may be necessary. Ultrasound examination has been shown to be the most reliable and easiest method to assist in the diagnostic workup. Testa and colleagues found that abdominal wall ultra­sonography was accurate in 86% of cases of spigelian hernia. If the hernia is fully reduced during examination and no mass is palpable, ultrasound evaluation can show a break in the echogenic shadow of the semilunar line associated with the fascial defect. Ultrasound can also identify the nonreduced hernia sac passing through the defect in the spigelian fascia. Computed tomographic scanning of the abdomen will also conrm the presence of a spigelian hernia. As described above, the anatomy of the spigelian hernia should make it readily apparent on laparoscopic evaluation of the anterior abdominal wall.
38
abdominis aponeuroses closes the fascial defect. Essentially, this approximates the internal oblique and transversus fas­cia laterally to the rectus sheath medially. Prosthetic mesh is not required for this repair, although the use of mesh plugs to close the hernia defect has been described.
38
is uncommon and the operation is usually well tolerated.
LUMBAR HERNIA
e lumbar region is bordered by the twelfth rib superiorly, the iliac crest inferiorly, the erector spinae muscles of the back posteriorly, and a vertical line between the anterior tip of the twelfth rib and the iliac crest anteriorly. e region contains two anatomic triangles, through which the rare lumbar hernia can form. e inferior lumbar triangle of Petit is the more common of the two. Its anterior border is the posterior edge of the external oblique muscle, the posterior border is the anterior extent of the latissimus dorsi muscle, and the inferior border is the iliac crest (Fig. 7-15). e ante­rior oor of the canal formed by this triangle is the lum­bar fascia. Occasionally, the lower border of the latissimus dorsi muscle overlaps the external oblique muscle, and in this setting the triangle is absent. e superior lumbar tri­angle of Grynfeltt (see Fig.7-15) is deeper and is bounded by the twelfth rib and the serratus posterior inferior muscle, theposterior border of the internal oblique muscle, and by the quadratus lumborum and erector spinae muscles pos­teriorly. e oor of the superior triangle is composed of transversalis fascia and the entire triangular space is covered posteriorly by the latissimus dorsi muscle.
Congenital lumbar hernias are rare, but case reports can be found in the literature. Lumbar hernias most commonly present in adults older than 50 years of age. Two-thirds of the cases are reported in males, and left-sided hernias are thought to be more common. Bilateral lumbar hernias have been reported. Acquired lumbar hernias have been associated with
Recurrence
Treatment
e treatment for spigelian hernia is operative repair once the diagnosis has been conrmed, given the risk for incar­ceration. is is usually performed under general anesthesia given the need for splitting of the external oblique muscle. Atransverse incision is made directly over the palpable mass or fascial defect. A hernia in the subcutaneous space will reveal itself immediately, and an interparietal hernia will require further dissection. In this way, the external oblique fascia is incised and the external oblique muscle is split to identify the sac posterior to the muscle. e sac is freed from its surrounding attachments until the neck is isolated. e sac is opened, the intra-abdominal contents reduced, and the sac is either excised if sizable or simply inverted into the intra-abdominal cavity. Suturing the medial and lateral edges of the internal oblique and transversus
FIGURE 7-15 e anatomy of the lumbar hernia illustrating the
superior and inferior lumbar triangles.
Chapter 7 Hernias 149
back or ank trauma, poliomyelitis, back surgery, and the use of the iliac crest as a donor site for bone grafts.
Strangulation is rare in lumbar hernias since at least two of the three boundaries for the hernia defect are soft and mus­cular in origin. e hernia tends to increase in size over time and may assume large proportions and overhang the iliac crest. Symptoms range from a vague dullness in the ank or lower back to focal pain associated with movement over the site of the defect. On physical examination, a soft swelling in the lower posterior abdomen will be found that is usu­ally reducible without diculty. e hernia will increase in size with straining or a standard Valsalva maneuver. Ultra­sonographic or computed tomographic imaging is usually obtained in the patient with a suspected lumbar hernia to conrm the diagnosis.
Operative repair of the lumbar hernia is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and in a modied lateral decubitus position. A kidney rest can be used to widen the lumbar space between the twelfth rib and iliac crest. An oblique skin incision is made in the region of the hernia and the sac is identied. e dissection may require takedown of the latissi­mus dorsi muscle to reach the deeper superior lumbar triangle.
FIGURE 7-16 e superior and inferior sciatic foramina and the
direction of sciatic hernias.
Once the sac is identied, it is opened and the contents are carefully reduced. e empty sac can then be inverted or sim­ply excised. While complicated procedures for lumbar hernia closure utilizing muscle aps and grafts have been described, a small defect surrounded by healthy tissue can usually be closed primarily with an interrupted or continuous layer of nylon or polypropylene suture. If a large defect is found or the tissues appear weak, the hernia may be repaired with a large sheet of prosthetic nonabsorbable mesh placed between the peritoneal layer and the abdominal wall musculature. To prevent migra­tion, the mesh is usually xed to the peripheral tissues by a series of interrupted nonabsorbable sutures.
Recently, minimally invasive approaches to repair of lumbar hernias have been reported. ese involve either intraperitoneal laparoscopy necessitating takedown of the lateral peritoneal reection of the colon to facilitate exposure of the hernia defect,
39
or retroperitoneoscopy in which the lateral retroperitoneal space
40
is entered and insuated.
Initial results with the minimally invasive approaches are encouraging, although these case series contain small numbers of subjects.
e hernia sac passes laterally, inferiorly, and ultimately posteriorly to lie deep to the gluteus maximus muscle. While case reports of this rare hernia exist in the pediatric age group, the majority of sciatic hernias are found in the adult population. e patient complains of pain deep in the but­tock that may radiate down the leg in the sciatic nerve dis­tribution. Alternatively, the patient may report a lump in the buttock or infragluteal area that is painful and tender. Rarely, ureteral obstruction occurs because the ipsilateral ureter is contained within the hernia contents. Physical examination often reveals a reducible mass deep to the gluteus maximus, although the actual hernia defect is rarely palpable given the anatomic depth and the thickness of the buttock muscula­ture. Incarceration of the hernia can occur, and sciatic hernia has been known to present with bowel obstruction.
e treatment of a sciatic hernia is surgical. Both trans­peritoneal and transgluteal approaches have been described in depth, and the transperitoneal technique is preferred in the setting of bowel obstruction or incarceration. Rarely, a com­bined approach will be necessary to fully reduce the hernia
SCIATIC HERNIA
contents. Even in the setting of incarceration, the bowel can usually be reduced from within the hernia with gentle trac-
A sciatic hernia is dened as a protrusion of peritoneum and intra-abdominal contents through the greater or lesser sciatic notch (Fig. 7-16). e greater sciatic notch is traversed by the piriformis muscle, and hernia sacs can protrude either superior or inferior to this muscle. ere are classically three variants of the sciatic hernia that are dened by their anatomic site of exit from the pelvis. e suprapiriform defect is by far the most common and is thought to represent 60% of cases of sciatic hernia. Infrapiriform hernias are found in approximately 30% of cases, and subspinous hernias (through the lesser sciatic foramen) occur in 10% of cases.
tion. When necessary with the transperitoneal approach, the defect can be dilated with manual manipulation or the piriformis muscle may be partially incised. Full visualization of the structures is necessary and great care must be taken to avoid injury to the many nerves and vessels found in this region. After the sac has been excised, the defect is repaired using interrupted nonabsorbable suture or a prosthetic mesh plug or patch for larger hernia defects.
e posterior or transgluteal technique can be utilized for uncomplicated, reducible sciatic hernias diagnosed preoperatively. With this method the patient is placed in the prone position.
150 Part II Abdominal Wall
e gluteus maximus muscle is approached through a gluteal incision starting at the posterior edge of the greater trochanter and is detached at its origin to expose the hernia defect. is exposure allows visualization of the piriformis muscle, the gluteal vessels and nerve, and the sciatic nerve. e sac is then isolated and opened. Following reduction of the hernia contents, the defect can be sutured closed using large nonabsorbable suture or repaired with a prosthetic mesh.
POSTOPERATIVE VENTRAL WALL (INCISIONAL) HERNIA
A postoperative ventral abdominal wall hernia, more commonly termed incisional hernia, is the result of a failure of fascial tissues to heal and close following laparotomy. Such hernias can occur after any type of abdominal wall incision, although the highest incidence is seen with mid-
41
line and transverse incisions.
Postoperative ventral hernias following paramedian, subcostal, McBurney, Pfannenstiel, and ank incisions have also been described in the literature. Laparoscopic port sites may also develop hernia defects in the abdominal wall fascia.
As the approximated fascial tissue separates, the bowel and omentum herniate through the opening, covered by a peritoneal sac. ese hernias can increase in size to enormous proportions, and giant ventral hernias can contain a signi­cant amount of small or large bowel. At the extreme end of the ventral hernia spectrum is the giant incisional hernia that leads to loss of the abdominal domain, which occurs when the intra-abdominal contents can no longer lie within the abdominal cavity.
Incidence and Etiology
Incisional hernias have been reported in up to 20% of patients undergoing laparotomy. Modern rates of incisional hernia range from 2% to 11%. 100,000 ventral incisional hernia repairs are performed each year in the United States alone. e incidence seems to be lower in smaller incisions so that laparoscopic port site her­nias are much less common than hernias following large midline abdominal incisions. While it was once believed that the majority of incisional hernias presented within the rst 12 months following laparotomy, longer-term data indicate that at least one-third of these hernias will present 5–10 years postoperatively.
Multiple risk factors exist for the development of an inci­sional hernia. Some of these risks are under the control of the surgeon at the initial operation, while many others are patient specic or related to postoperative complications. Patient-specic risks for postoperative ventral hernia include advanced age, malnutrition, presence of ascites, corticosteroid use, diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, and obesity. Emergency surgery is known to increase the risk of incisional
42–44
It is estimated that approximately
41,45–47
hernia formation. Wound infection is believed to be one of the most signicant prognostic risk factors for development
41,48
of an incisional hernia.
It is for this reason that many surgeons advocate aggressive and early opening of the skin closure to drain any potential infection at the fascial level. Postoperative sepsis has also been identied as a risk for sub­sequent incisional hernia.
Technical aspects of wound closure likely contribute to incisional hernia formation. Wounds closed under excessive tension are prone to fascial closure disturbance. erefore, a continuous closure is advocated to disperse the tension throughout the length of the wound. In this way, 1 cm bites of fascia on either side of the incision are taken with each pass of the suture and the suture is advanced 1 cm at a time along the length of the incision. e type of incision may aect her­nia formation. Studies have shown that transverse incisions are associated with a reduced incidence of incisional hernia compared to midline vertical laparotomies, although the data are far from conclusive.
46,49
Clinical Manifestations
e patient with an incisional hernia will complain of a bulge in the abdominal wall originating deep to the skin scar. e bulge may cause varying degrees of discomfort or may present as a cosmetic concern. Symptoms will usually be aggravated by coughing or straining as the hernia contents protrude through the abdominal wall defect. In large ventral hernias, the skin may present with ischemic or pressure necrosis lead­ing to frank ulceration. Presentation of the incisional hernia with incarceration causing bowel obstruction is not uncom­mon. is may be associated with a history of repeated mild attacks of colicky dull abdominal pain and nausea consistent with incomplete bowel obstruction.
On examination the hernia is usually easy to identify and the edges of the fascial defect can often be dened by palpation. e entire abdominal wall along the length of the incision should be inspected and palpated carefully, as mul­tiple hernias are often present in the setting of an incisional hernia. In the obese patient with a suspected incisional her­nia that cannot be conrmed on examination, computed tomography of the abdomen is the best way to visualize intra-abdominal contents within the hernia sac. In extreme instances, laparoscopy may be required to diagnose a hernia defect that only intermittently contains intra-abdominal contents.
Treatment
e treatment of ventral incisional hernia is operative repair, and three general classes of operative repair have emerged in the modern era. ese techniques include primary suture repair of the hernia, open repair of the hernia with prosthetic mesh, and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. e major sequela from operative repair of the incisional hernia is hernia
Chapter 7 Hernias 151
recurrence, and there are convincing data that placement of mesh to repair the hernia defect has decreased the high recur­rence rate historically associated with primary suture repair to
50,51
less than 25%. that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair will have the lowest
Many advocates of the operation believe
A
rate of hernia recurrence and denitive studies are underway to assess this question.
In general, primary repair of incisional hernias can be per­formed for hernia defects less than 4 cm in diameter with strong, viable surrounding tissue. For larger hernias or her­nias associated with multiple small defects, mesh repair is indicated. Even with mesh repair, hernia recurrence remains a signicant complication. In one multicenter trial, for example, 200 patients were randomly assigned to suture or mesh repair of a primary hernia or a rst recurrence of hernia at the site
52
ofa vertical midline incision.
e 3-year cumulative rates of
B
recurrence among patients who had suture or mesh for repair of a primary hernia were 43% and 24%, respectively. e rates of second recurrence were 58% and 20%, respectively.
PRIMARY SUTURE REPAIR
e operation is best performed with the patient under gen­eral anesthesia to achieve full relaxation of the abdominal wall musculature. e skin is opened through the previous inci­sion and dissection is performed through the subcutaneous
C
tissues. Care should be taken as the level of the anterior rectus sheath is approached since portions of the sac and its contents may lie at this level. e sac is identied and cleared of its attachments to the fascia using electrocautery. In this way, any peritoneal attachments to the anterior abdominal wall in the vicinity of the hernia are taken down and the sac is fully reduced into the abdominal cavity. e fascia is then cleared of soft tissue both anteriorly and posteriorly for at least a 3–4
FIGURE 7-17 Separation of components of the abdominal wall to
mobilize the fascia toward the midline.
cm margin. is allows for a margin of healthy fascia to bring together in the midline with suture closure.
e fascia is then closed using an interrupted layer of nonabsorbable suture by taking large bites of the clean fascia on both sides of the defect. e sutures are usually placed sequentially and then tied after the entire layer of suture has been placed. e fascia is then inspected to conrm that no additional defects are present and that the repair sutures are not pulling through the tissue due to excessive tension. e skin is closed over the fascia using either staples or a running subcuticular layer. If the hernia contents have created a large pocket in the soft tissue above the anterior fascia, placement of a closed suction drain for evacuation of early seroma uid can be considered.
If there is tension upon attempted closure of the abdomi­nal wall, a separation of components can be performed in order to mobilize the fascia toward the midline (Fig. 7-17). is technique begins with the mobilization of the skin and soft tissue o of the underlying fascia. e fascia of the exter­nal oblique is then incised lateral to the rectus abdominis and the external oblique is dissected free from the internal oblique in a relatively avascular plane. is alone allows for signicant mobilization of the abdominal wall toward
the midline. Should additional mobilization be required, the posterior rectus sheath can be incised in a longitudinal fashion to allow the overlying rectus abdominis and anterior
53
rectus sheath to slide even further toward the midline.
is technique allows for closure of complex or infected abdomi­nal wounds without the need for implantation of any foreign material.
Over the last 10–15 years, the introduction of compo­nent separation as a method for repairing ventral hernias has gained increasing popularity due to its conceptual purity and its overwhelming success. Recent series including those by
54
has reported his experience in 200 patients who under-
Ko went this procedure over the course of slightly over 1 decade. e overall recurrence rate was 21%. Supportive polypropyl­ene mesh was employed to cover the defect. In the process of performing this procedure, bilateral releases of the external oblique muscle are performed and the fascia is mobilized, thereby allowing medial movement of the rectus muscle. is brings the rectus muscle closer to the midline and achieves a muscular closure of the midline which can be rein­forced or strengthened by the placement of either biologic or