Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3627_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать
12
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A spot lm obtained before an angiographic procedure in this woman. The image shows an Essure intratubal sterilization device (arrows).
Dierential Diagnosis
Essure intratubal sterilization device: The current
case shows an Essure intratubal sterilization device
(Bayer, Whippany, NJ).
Malpositioned intrauterine device: This is a possibility;
however, the location and appearance of the Essure device is quite characteristic. No other intrauterine device has this same appearance.
Postsurgical foreign body: This is also a possibility; however, as mentioned previously, the Essure device has
a characteristic appearance.
Essential Facts
The Essure system was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for permanent sterilization in 2002.
It is a nitinol coil that is implanted in the oce, under hysteroscopy. The procedure is an outpatient procedure.
The Essure device has a characteristic appearance on plain lms.
Pearls and Pitfalls
üThe Essure system is designed to induce brosis and
tubal occlusion.
üEective and complete tubal occlusion by this device
needs to be conrmed by hysterosalpingogram
3 months after insertion.
üSeveral complications have been described after Essure
insertion, including incomplete tubal occlusion, tubal perforation, intractable pain, bleeding, and unintended
pregnancies.
Case 7
https://t.me/med1917
13
A B
Clinical Presentation
A 59-year-old diabetic man presents with lower back pain and fever.
14
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A B
(A) Selected sagittal image from a diagnostic, noncontrast MRI shows abnormal soft tissue bulging at the L5/S1 level. There is moderate compression of the thecal sac. (B) Selected axial image of the L5/S1 space during disk aspiration. The image shows an 18-gauge needle within the abnormal area.
Dierential Diagnosis
L5/S1 pyogenic diskitis: The abnormal bulging in the L5/S1 space is suggestive of a disk infection. The cultures were positive for Corynebacterium striatum. Disk aspiration is important for diagnosis.
Spinal tuberculosis or fungal infection: These are strong
possibilities. Dierential diagnosis is established with
cultures of the abnormal tissue.
Essential Facts
• The most common mechanism of vertebral osteomyelitis and diskitis is hematogenous spread from a distant site. Direct trauma and postsurgical complications could also be causes of spinal infection.
Symptoms can be nonspecic, but a leading symptom is back pain.
• Cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) is useful to establish the diagnosis.
Pearls and Pitfalls
üThe most accurate method to establish etiology is
image-guided needle aspiration (guidelines from the Infectious Disease Society of America).
üCT is recommended for diagnostic aspiration of the
lumbosacral area. Tilting the gantry is useful to guide the needle tract in the optimal angle (see image A, above).
üFluoroscopic guidance is useful for the thoracic spine
and upper lumbar spine.
üNeedle aspiration is 90 to 95% sensitive for diagnosis.
üFluoroscopic guidance of the lumbosacral area is
dicult and may result in a prolonged, unsuccessful
procedure or complications.
Case 8
https://t.me/med1917
15
A
Clinical Presentation
A 52-year-old woman presents with left leg swelling. Venogram was obtained in a prone position.
16
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A B C
(A) A venous digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) obtained in the prone position—the left common iliac vein shows a 95% stenosis immediately caudal to
the junction with the inferior vena cava. (B) A selected image from a venous DSA obtained 24 hours after catheter-directed infusion of tissue plasminogen activator. The appearance of the vein has improved, but there is a residual 60 to 70% stenosis. (C) A selected image from a venous DSA after iliac vein stent placement. The left iliac vein is now widely patent.
Dierential Diagnosis
May–Thurner syndrome: The case is diagnostic. The stenosis within the left common iliac vein shows the characteristic signs of May–Thurner syndrome. This stenosis is caused by compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery.
Venous brosis: This is a possible diagnosis but in the absence of an underlying cause, this is low in the
dierential.
Spontaneous venous thrombosis: Very rare in this location, especially in the absence of an underlying cause.
Essential Facts
• May–Thurner anatomy is the compression of the left common iliac vein by the right common iliac artery. This anatomic relationship results in left lower extremity swelling, pain, and venous thrombosis.
• The compression of the left iliac vein by the right iliac
artery and its clinical consequences were identied and
described by Virchow in 1851.
• Clinical presentation and history are essential components for diagnosis.
Pearls and Pitfalls
üCross-sectional imaging is the key to diagnosis. üEndovascular stent placement has been accepted as the
treatment of choice for symptomatic patients who do not respond to conservative therapy.
üFor patients presenting with extensive iliofemoral deep
venous thrombosis, catheter-directed thrombolysis followed by stent placement is an accepted therapeutic option.
üClinical suspicion is the key. Many patients with
May–Thurner syndrome go undiagnosed.
Case 9
https://t.me/med1917
17
A
Clinical Presentation
A 62-year-old woman presents with gross hematuria.
B
18
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A B C
(A) A selected axial image of a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen. The CT scan shows a saccular structure arising from the left renal artery
(arrow). No extravasation is identied. (B) A selected image from a selective left renal artery digital subtraction angiogram (DSA). The image shows a complex left renal artery aneurysm. The artery has a beaded appearance. (C) A selected image from a selective left renal artery DSA after coil embolization
of the aneurysm. Note preservation of ow to renal parenchyma.
Dierential Diagnosis
Aneurysm of the left renal artery; patient with bromuscular dysplasia: Characteristic appearance by CT scan and arteriogram.
Pseudoaneurysm of the renal artery: In the absence of a
traumatic or inammatory cause, this diagnosis is less
likely.
Renal cell carcinoma: Renal cell carcinoma is identied as a solid, hypervascular mass in the kidney parenchyma. On occasion, more central aneurysms may appear as solid masses.
Essential Facts
• Renal artery aneurysms are uncommon. The true incidence in the general population is unknown.
Association between bromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and renal artery aneurysms has been described.
• Symptoms include pain, hematuria, and hypertension.
Pearls and Pitfalls
üIndications for treatment include symptoms (pain or
hematuria), enlargement over time, or size larger than 2 cm.
üSelective coil embolization is emerging as a suitable
minimally invasive option.
üCareful selective embolization with preservation of
renal parenchyma is crucial.
üAneurysm should not be confused with a solid
tumor/mass.
Case 10
https://t.me/med1917
19
A
C
Clinical Presentation
A 48-year-old man, who underwent laparoscopic resection of a left renal cell carcinoma 3 weeks prior, presents with hema­turia and back pain.
B
20
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A
(A) A selected axial image of a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen. A large saccular structure with avid contrast enhancement is identied in the
mid-pole of the left kidney (arrow). (B) A selected digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image from a selective left renal arteriogram. The large saccular structure arises from a segmental branch of the lower pole (arrow). (C) A selected DSA image from a selective left renal arteriogram after embolization with direct injection of thrombin within the saccular structure and coil embolization of the supplying lower pole artery. Minimal parenchymal loss is noted.
Dierential Diagnosis
Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm of the left kidney: This complication is increasingly reported in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Mycotic aneurysm of the renal artery: A good option if this patient did not have the surgical history. Spontaneous lesions like the one presented here are very unusual.
Postsurgical hematoma: A strong possibility; however, in the absence of hemodynamic instability and perirenal soft tissue stranding, this option is less likely.
Essential Facts
• This is a rare complication, recently described after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
• Patients present with back pain, dysuria, and hematuria.
• Endovascular management of this complication is the
rst line of treatment.
Coil placement on the end-artery should suce to eliminate the lesion. Thrombin injection is optional and should be performed with extreme care.
B C
Pearls and Pitfalls
üContrast-enhanced CT is the cross-sectional imaging
method of choice for diagnosis.
üIn patients with borderline renal function, a color
Doppler evaluation may be diagnostic.
üHigh clinical suspicion is crucial.
üEndovascular treatment may be associated with distal
embolization or arterial dissection.
üIf treated with thrombin, this needs to be administered
with extreme care and in increments of 100 units per injection.
Case 11
https://t.me/med1917
A B
Clinical Presentation
A 58-year-old man underwent Whipple surgery for pancreatic cancer. Shortly after surgery, the patient presents with hemodynamic decompensation.
21
Further Work-up
C