Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3627_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
63 Мб
Скачать
112
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A B
C D
(A) Arterial-phase, contrast-enhanced CT scan shows contrast lling an outpouching (arrow) adjacent to the common femoral artery (CFA). (B) Color Doppler
image shows a narrow neck (arrowhead) leading from the CFA to a pseudoaneurysm (PSA) (arrow) exhibiting the “yin–yang” sign. (C) Doppler ultrasound image shows bidirectional arterial ow (arrow) within the PSA (“to-and-fro” waveform). (D) Following thrombin injection, no color ow is noted in the PSA (arrow).
Dierential Diagnosis
Iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm (PSA): The “yin–yang” sign is characteristic of this entity.
Femoral aneurysm: A true aneurysm will not show the “to-and-fro” waveform.
Essential Facts
• PSAs are aneurysms contained by less than three layers of the vessel wall—occasionally by only the surrounding soft tissues and organizing hematoma.
• Femoral PSAs result from arterial catheterization with an incidence of 0 to 2%—most commonly, when larger sheaths are required for intervention.
• Other causes include bypass graft anastomosis, trauma, and infection. Anticoagulation, hypertension, and obesity are risk factors.
• Larger PSAs (. 2 cm) tend to remain patent and may continue to grow, increasing the risk of rupture. Complications may include massive hemorrhage and compartment syndrome with vascular or neurologic compromise. Small PSAs more commonly thrombose spontaneously.
• Imaging considerations:
Doppler ultrasound is used to screen patients with
pulsatile groin swelling after catheterization to distinguish hematoma from pseudoaneurysm. Signs of PSA include:
“Yin–yang” color pattern representing swirling ow.
“To-and-fro” waveform at the conduit between the PSA and the parent artery.
CT angiography better denes the size of the PSA, the
vessel of origin, and the neck length and diameter in order to plan treatment.
Small PSAs may be treated or watched with serial
Doppler ultrasound. Large PSAs are treated.
• Treatment options for femoral PSAs:
Ultrasound-monitored compression. Advantages
of this option are low risk and low cost, but disadvantages are long procedure times, patient discomfort, and a high recurrence rate in anticoagulated patients.
Thrombin injection. This option has largely replaced
compression as the therapy of choice for narrow­neck PSAs. For large-neck PSAs, the risk of distal embolization may be too great for thrombin injection. Increments of 100 IU of thrombin in 0.1 mL of saline are slowly injected under ultrasound monitoring until thrombosis is observed, typically requiring a total of 200 to 750 IU. Complications include distal embolization and allergic reaction to thrombin.
Coil embolization. If the parent artery is a peripheral
branch, thrombin injection is still an option, but some cases may be treated with coil embolization. Source branches include inferior epigastric, femoral
circumex, deep femoral, and deep circumex iliac
arteries.
Stent graft. More suitable for PSAs with large necks
originating from large parent arteries.
Surgical repair. Reserved for PSAs for which minimally
invasive methods fail or are not feasible.
ü Pearls and û Pitfalls
8û Stent graft placement across the hip articulation to
treat common femoral artery PSAs is usually avoided because repetitive motion can lead to endoleaks, new PSA formation, stent fracture, and stent occlusion.
Case 57
https://t.me/med1917
113
A
Clinical Presentation
A 58-year-old man with a history of bacterial endocarditis and heart failure presents with fever and abdominal pain.
Further Work-up
B
C
114
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A
(A, B) Arterial-phase, contrast-enhanced CT scan with axial and coronal reformatting shows a large enhancing aneurysm (arrow) adjacent to branches of
the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). A left ventricular assist device is present. (C) Selected SMA arteriogram shows a narrow-necked aneurysm (arrow) originating directly from the SMA. (D) Successful embolization was achieved with coils placed within the aneurysm sac (large arrow) and a plug placed in the neck (small arrow).
Dierential Diagnosis
Mycotic aneurysm: Top choice for a large, thick-walled,
contrast-lled sac in the setting of fever, bacterial
endocarditis, and heart failure requiring a ventricular assist device. More convincing CT signs of infection are not present, such as fat stranding, abscess, or gas associated with the aneurysm.
Traumatic or iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm: A possibility, given the absence of other signs of arterial disease.
Essential Facts
• Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) aneurysms account for , 6% of visceral artery aneurysms.
• Septic thromboembolism is the most common cause, and as a result, mycotic aneurysms tend to occur at branch points where emboli lodge. Other causes include
adjacent peritoneal or mesenteric infection/inammation
as well as superinfection of traumatic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.
Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species are the most common causes; in many cases, multiple organisms
including enteric ora may be cultured. No organism is identied in 25%.
Up to 90% of clinically signicant peripheral artery emboli originate from the heart. Etiologies include atrial arrhythmias, mitral valve disease, and fungal or bacterial endocarditis. Other proximal arterial sources of thromboemboli include upstream aortic aneurysms and ulcerated atherosclerotic plaque.
• Mycotic aneurysms can enlarge rapidly and are highly prone to rupture, particularly during the active period of infection. Rupture is the presenting condition in up to 50% of cases of SMA aneurysms, with a high rate of mortality (up to 90%). Other clinical signs include fever, abdominal pain, and a palpable abdominal mass.
• Imaging considerations:
◦ Multiphase CT scanning helps to plan surgical or
endovascular therapy and identies signs of rupture
such as frank contrast extravasation, perianeurysmal fat stranding, and hematoma.
B C
◦ Regional infectious or inammatory causes can be
excluded. Signs of infection include perianeurysmal
uid collections, fat stranding, and gas within or
adjacent to the aneurysm.
• Treatment considerations: ◦ Treatment is almost always indicated because of the
high risk of rupture.
◦ Mycotic aneurysms are initially treated with antibiotics
prior to surgical or endovascular intervention.
◦ Surgical resection of the aneurysm is commonly
required for ongoing infection, rapid expansion, and rupture. Presurgical embolization may be performed to stabilize patients or buy time to surgical candidacy.
Depending on anatomical and clinical ndings, arterial
ligation and reperfusion via bypass or reimplantation may be necessary.
◦ Endovascular management options may be considered
after antibiotic treatment in slow-growing, unruptured mycotic aneurysms.
◦ Some aneurysms may be packed with coils (saccular) or
treated with back door–front door coil placement.
◦ Wide-neck aneurysms may be treated with stent-
assisted coil embolization. A self-expanding stent is placed within the parent artery across the aneurysm neck to prevent nontarget coil embolization during aneurysm packing.
◦ Percutaneous thrombin injection is an option for
narrow-necked, saccular aneurysms of the visceral arteries.
◦ Covered stents are typically avoided in cases of ongoing
infection.
Pearls and Pitfalls
8Most SMA aneurysms should be treated rather than
followed with imaging because they commonly rupture, resulting in a high mortality rate compared to other visceral aneurysms (50 vs. 10%).
8Surgery is typically required for ongoing infection
and rapidly expanding or ruptured aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.
D
Case 58
https://t.me/med1917
115
A
Clinical Presentation
A 37-year-old man presents with increasingly cold ngers over the last year.
B C
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
https://t.me/med1917
116
Imaging Findings
A B, C
(A) Conventional angiogram at the start of the venous phase of imaging shows persistent opacication of the ulnar artery, which is obstructed at the
level of the hamate bone (large arrow); the hypothenar tissues are supplied by a collateral branch (arrowhead). Beading of the ulnar artery is suspicious for brous dysplasia (small arrow). (B) Hand angiogram shows abrupt occlusion of multiple digital arteries (arrows) of the second through fourth digits as well as aneurysms or ectasia (arrowhead) of palmar collaterals. (C) Delayed-phase image shows diminished perfusion to the hypothenar eminence (arrow) caused by absence of the ulnar components of the supercial and deep palmar arches.
Dierential Diagnosis
Hypothenar hammer syndrome (HHS): Indicated by
occlusion of the ulnar artery at the hamate bone and
bromuscular dysplasia, a common associated nding in HHS. The ulnar artery serves as a source of distal emboli, although involvement of the digital arteries of the fourth and fth digits is more common than involvement of the second through fourth digits, as in this case.
Embolus: Embolus from a more proximal source (cardiac
or proximal arterial aneurysm) is a possibility given the abrupt cuto of multiple digital arteries as well as the ulnar artery.
Atherosclerosis: Less likely because this is a young adult
without signicant arterial disease elsewhere.
Essential Facts
Hypothenar hammer syndrome (HHS) is occlusive injury to the ulnar artery as it passes the hamate bone (Guyon’s
canal); it is usually caused by repetitive occupational trauma to the hypothenar tissues. High-risk occupations include roofers, mechanics, carpenters, and jackhammer operators.
HHS may be isolated or associated with brous dysplasia of the ulnar artery as in this case, which is then exacerbated by repetitive blunt trauma.
If aneurysmal, the aected ulnar artery may serve as a source of distal emboli. In this case, small aneurysms of collateral palmar arteries are noted, which may have resulted in emboli to the digital arteries.
• Clinical presentation includes ischemia (in cases of incomplete palmar arches or distal emboli as in this case)
or numbness in the fourth and fth digits (compression by adjacent ulnar aneurysm or direct eect of repetitive trauma).
No endovascular treatment exists. Surgical bypass is performed for severe cases, but early rethrombosis is common.
• Imaging considerations:
Doppler ultrasound can screen for ulnar thrombosis
and aneurysms.
CT angiography is the best noninvasive tool for
diagnosis, but MR angiography may provide sucient distal arterial opacication.
Conventional angiography is the gold standard and
may become necessary in equivocal cases or to plan surgical repair. Administer a vasodilator such as papaverine in equivocal cases to determine the extent of vasospasm versus xed occlusion in the aected hand. Improvement of ow does not exclude HHS because vasospasm is a common component.
The contralateral hand may have similar ndings
or a “corkscrew” conguration of the ulnar artery suggestive of brous dysplasia.
Pearls and Pitfalls
Raynaud’s phenomenon, or secondary Raynaud’s, is
vasospasm superimposed on another disorder and may complicate HHS. Diagnostic evaluation may benet
from repeat angiography after administration of a
vasodilator such as nitroglycerin or papaverine.
If a component of Raynaud’s phenomenon is suspected,
thoracic sympathectomy is performed in some patients to reduce sympathetic tone and open thermoregulatory
arteriovenous shunts to increase skin perfusion. Other treatments include vasodilators such as calcium channel blockers and prostaglandins.
Case 59
https://t.me/med1917
117
A
Clinical Presentation
A 63-year-old man presents for treatment of an incidental nding on a recent CT scan.
Further Work-up
B C
118
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A
(A) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an ovoid, partially exophytic, well-circumscribed, enhancing right renal mass (arrow). (B) A microwave ablation antenna (arrow) has been advanced with the tip in the center of the lesion. (C) Post-ablation image showing gas (arrow) in the ablation zone.
Dierential Diagnosis
Renal cell carcinoma: The presumed diagnosis, although
multiphase imaging would provide better evaluation.
Benign renal tumor: A possibility because smaller renal masses are dicult to characterize on imaging studies.
Essential Facts
The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing, likely as a result of the increased use of and improvement of multiphase cross-sectional imaging. This practice results in an increase in incidental detection of early RCCs treatable by thermal ablation.
Treatment of early RCC (, 4 cm):
◦ Nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy for surgical
candidates remains the rst-line treatment.
◦ Ablation is usually used for patients with high surgical
risk, poor renal function, a solitary kidney, or a hereditary risk of multiple RCCs (e.g., von Hippel– Lindau syndrome).
Technique for RCC ablation:
◦ Ablation is performed using cryoablation, microwave
ablation, or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) under CT guidance.
◦ The lesion is targeted to achieve treatment margins of
5 to 10 mm beyond the tumor.
◦ Immediate CT scanning after treatment can be
performed without contrast. Cryotherapy results in a well-marginated, uniformly low-density treatment zone. RFA and microwave ablation result in perinephric fat stranding, variable density, and occasional gas within the treatment zone. Immediate hemorrhage is hyperdense and can be surveilled using noncontrast CT scanning.
◦ Surveillance, multiphase cross-sectional imaging is
performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; then every 6 months for 1 year; and every 12 months thereafter, although protocols vary. CT and MRI are options for post-treatment surveillance. For the CT option, patients with poor renal function should be prehydrated and imaged with limited contrast dose.
◦ Residual tumor or local recurrence is indicated by
increase in lesion size and contrast enhancement. Normal ndings on follow-up imaging include a hypointense “halo” around the ablation zone (RFA . cryotherapy) and benign peri-ablational enhancement (cryotherapy . RFA).
Pearls and Pitfalls
üComparable 5-year survival rates have been reported for
early RCC treated by surgical resection versus thermal ablation, raising the possibility that ablation may be a rst-line alternative.
üExophytic tumors are associated with lower rates of
residual tumor following ablation.
üTumors . 3 cm in diameter have a higher rate of
recurrence after successful treatment.
üMajor complications occur in 3 to 5% of cases and
include bowel injury, hemorrhage, and injury to the renal collecting system (more common with central tumors and the use of RFA rather than cryotherapy).
CB
Case 60
https://t.me/med1917
119
A
Clinical Presentation
A 54-year-old man with a history of intermittent rectal bleeding presents with sudden onset of severe lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Endoscopic management failed to treat bleeding from a large, exposed artery, and the patient was rushed to interventional radiology.
B
120
https://t.me/med1917
RadCases.thieme.com RadCases Interventional Radiology
Imaging Findings
A B
(A) Selected inferior mesenteric arteriogram (IMA) shows an abnormally enlarged branch (arrowhead) of the superior rectal artery supplying a large focus of extravasation (arrow) into the distal rectum. (B) Successful coil embolization of this branch (arrow).
Dierential Diagnosis
Dieulafoy lesion causing rectal hemorrhage: The most likely diagnosis, given the presence of a single, abnormally large extravasating artery.
Angiodysplasia: Occurs in elderly people, but an abnormal tuft of vessels and an early draining vein would provide
more specic evidence.
Neoplasia or infection: Would have nonspecic imaging ndings; neither is suggested by the history.
Essential Facts
• Dieulafoy lesions are abnormally enlarged arterial branches in the gastrointestinal (GI) submucosa. They are more
common in men (2:1) and occur throughout the GI tract;
most (75%) occur in the stomach, usually along the lesser curvature. Extragastric versions most commonly occur in the duodenum and colon and along surgical anastomoses.
• Presentation is usually bleeding requiring admission (hematemesis if gastric) after a history of recurrent bleeding.
• Etiology is unknown. They often occur without local
inammation, suggesting a developmental cause.
Patients usually have other conditions such as chronic
renal insuciency, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and
hypertension.
• Diagnostic screening for lower GI hemorrhage:
◦ Colonoscopy is rst-line for diagnosis and treatment
but requires time for bowel prep, and many cases are emergent. This exam is eventually performed in all cases to diagnose the source of bleeding. Failed or infeasible colonoscopy indicates the need for either a tagged red blood cell (RBC) study or multiphase CT scanning.
◦ The tagged RBC study localizes and veries active
bleeding, indicated by abnormal radiotracer accumulation that increases in intensity and moves through bowel over time. Sensitivity is better than angiography because bleeding may be slow or intermittent and scans are performed continuously over hours.
◦ Multiphase CT scanning provides better localization
than the RBC study, with minimal reduction in sensitivity. The main downside is reliance on active bleeding at the moment of scanning.
◦ Angiography is performed with the intent to embolize the
bleeding or to localize the source for surgical resection.
• Treatment of lower GI hemorrhage: ◦ Medical treatment resolves most cases—correction of
coagulopathy, uid resuscitation, and transfusion.
◦ Colonoscopy is rst-line using electrocoagulation, laser
coagulation, sclerotherapy, clipping, or banding.
◦ Transarterial embolization (TAE) using coils or plugs
(for large lesions like this) or Gelfoam (Pzer, New York, NY) is rst line for acute, active bleeding. Particles and
glue have been described to treat angiodysplasia and vascular malformations, respectively.
◦ Vasopressin infusion has largely fallen out of favor due
to ischemic complications and prolonged treatment time. Protocol is 0.2 unit/h, which is increased to
0.4 unit/h if bleeding does not stop and is tapered over 12 to 24 hours if bleeding stops.
◦ Surgery is reserved for cases that are unstable or
refractory to less invasive therapies.
Pearls and Pitfalls
üEndoscopic ultrasound is highly sensitive for Dieulafoy
lesions. Failed endoscopic clipping of Dieulafoy lesions is usually treated with emergent embolization.
üLeft colonic and rectosigmoid bleeding may be
supplied by the superior rectal artery (from the inferior mesenteric), the middle rectal arteries (from the anterior division of the internal iliacs), and the inferior rectal arteries (from the internal pudendals). Rich collateralization makes ischemic complications of TAE exceedingly rare.
üRight colonic bleeding is less responsive to TAE than is
left colonic bleeding, likely caused by the right-sided preponderance of angiodysplasia, which has a high recurrence rate.
Case 61
https://t.me/med1917
121
A B
Clinical Presentation
A 51-year-old woman presents with crampy abdominal pain and urinary frequency.
C D