Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5769_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
65 Мб
Скачать
300 oracic ultrasound
33. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P et al. e lung point: an ultrasound sign specific to pneumo­thorax. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1434-1440.
34. Soldati G, Rossi M. Pneumotorace traumatico: diagnosi ecografia in urgenza. Giornale Italiano di Ecografia 2000; 3: 269-273.
35. Dulchavsky SA, Schwarz KL, Kirkpatrick AW et al. Prospective evaluation of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax. J Trauma 2001; 50: 201-205.
36. Rowan KR, Kirkpatrick AW et al. Traumatic pneumothorax detection with thoracic US: correlation with chest radiography and CT – initial experience. Radiology 2002; 225: 210-214.
37. Knudtson JL, Dort JM, Helmer SD et al. Surgeon-Performed ultrasound for pneumothorax in the trauma suite. J Trauma 2004; 56: 527-530.
38. Beckh S, Bolcskei PL, Lessnau KD. Real time chest ultrasonography. A comprehensive review for the pulmonologist. Chest 2002; 122: 1759-1773.
39. Tsai TH, Yang PC. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of pleural disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2003; 9: 282-290.
40. Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S et al. Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultraso-Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultraso­nography in the emergency department. Chest 2008; 133: 204-211.
41. Lichtenstein DA, Mezière G, Lascols N et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 1231-1238.
42. Nandipati KC, Allamaneni S, Kakarla R et al. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) in the diagnosis of pneumothorax: experience at a community based level I trauma center. Injury 2011; 42: 511-514.
43. Mathis G. orax sonography: part I. Chest wall and pleura. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997; 23: 1131-1139.
44. Lichtenstein D. General Ultrasound in the Critically Ill. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005, pp. 96-133.
45. Soldati G. Lung sonography: artifact, movement or echotexture? Giornale Italiano di Ecografia 2001; 4: 329-338.
46. Lichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P et al. e lung point: an ultrasound sign specific to pneumo­thorax. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1434-1440.
47. Soldati G. Sonographic findings in pulmonary diseases. Radiol Med 2006; 111: 507-515.
48. Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Lascols N et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of occult pneumothorax. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 1231-1238.
49. Stark P. Chest cage injuries. In: Radiology of thoracic trauma (Stark P ed.). Andover Medical Publisher, Boston, 1993.
50. Velmahos GC, Demeriades D. Early thoracoscopy for the evacuation of undrained haemothorax. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 924-929.
51.Kwon A, Sorrells DL, Kurkchubasche AG et al. Isolate computed tomography diagnosis of pulmonary contusion does not corelate with increased morbidity. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: 78-82.
52. Sisley AC, Rozicky GS, Ballard RB et al. Rapid detection of traumatic effusions using surgeon-performed ultrasonography. J Trauma 1998; 44: 291-295.
53. Ma OJ, Mateer JR. Trauma ultrasound examination versus chest radiography in the detection of hemo­thorax. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29: 312-315.
54. Balik M, Plasil P, Waldauf P et al. Ultrasound estimation of volume of pleural fluid in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 318-321.
55. Kreici CS, Trent EJ, Dubinsky T. oracic sonography. Respir Care 2001; 46: 932-939.
56. Boersma WG, Stigt JA, Smith HJ. Treatment of haemothorax. Respir Med 2010; 104: 1583-1587.
57. Fabbrucci P, Nocentini L, Secci S et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopy in the early diagnosis and manage-Video-assisted thoracoscopy in the early diagnosis and manage­ment of post traumatic pneumothorax and hemothorax. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1227-1231.
oracic trauma 301
58. Bilello JF, Davis JW, Lemaster DM. Occult traumatic hemothorax: when can sleeping dog lie? Am J Surg 2005; 190: 841-844.
59. Karmy-Jones R, Holevar M, Sullivan RJ. Residual hemothorax after chest tube placement correlates with increased risk of empyema following traumatic injury. Can Respir J 2008; 15: 255-258.
60. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Chan L et al. Predicting the need for thoracoscopic evacuation of residu­altraumatic hemothorax: chest radiography is insufficient. J Trauma 1999; 46: 65-70.
61. Michelet P, Couret D, Bregeon F et al. Early onset pneumonia in severe chest trauma: a risk factor analysis. J Trauma 2010; 68: 395-400.
62. Eren S, Esme H, Sehitogullari A, Durkan A. e risk factors and management of posttraumatic empiema in trauma patients. Injury 2008; 39: 44-49.
63. Eddy AC, Luna GK, Copass M. Empyema thoracis in patients undergoing emergent closed tube thora­costomy in thoracic trauma. Am J Surg 1989; 157: 494-497.
64. Brathwaite CE, Rodriguez A, Turney SZ et al. Blunt traumatic cardiac rupture. A 5 years experience. Ann Surg 1990; 212: 701-705.
65. Spodick DH. Cardiac tamponade. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 684-690.
66. Huang YK, Lu MS, Liu KS et al. Traumatic pericardial effusion: impact of diagnostic and surgical ap­proaches. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1682-1686.
67. McGahan JP, Richard GR. Blunt abdominal trauma: e role of emergent sonography an a review of the literature. AJR 1999; 172: 897-902.
68. Carrillo EH, Guinn BJ, Ali AT. Transthoracic ultrasonography is an alternative to subxyphoid ultrasonog-Transthoracic ultrasonography is an alternative to subxyphoid ultrasonog­raphy for the diagnosis of hemopericardium in penetrating precordial trauma. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 34-37.
69. Karmi-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Shatz DV et al. Management of traumatic lung injury: a Western Trauma Association Multicenter review. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1049-1053.
70. O’Connor JV, Kufera JA, Kems TJ et al. Crash and occupant predictors of pulmonary contusion. J Trauma 2009; 66: 1091-1095.
71. Wagner RB, Crawford WO, Schimp PP. Classification of parenchymal injuries of the lung. Radiology 1988; 167: 77-82.
72. Mirvis SE, Templeton PA. Imaging in acute thoracic trauma. Semin Roentgenol 1992; 27: 184-194.
73. Cohn SM, Dubose JJ. Pulmonary contusion: an update on recent advances in clinical management. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1959-1970.
74. Wagner RB, Jamieson PM. Pulmonary contusion: evaluation and classification by computed tomography. Surg Clin North Am 1989; 69: 31-40.
75. Cohn SM. Pulmonary contusion: review of the clinical entity. J Trauma 1997; 42: 973-979.
76. Kang EY, Muller NL. CT in blunt chest trauma: pulmonary, tracheobronchial and diaphragmetic injuries. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996; 17: 144-160.
77. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE. Imaging diagnosis of nonaortic thoracic injury. Radiol Clin N Am 1999; 37: 533-548.
78. Guerriero Lopez F, Vazquez Mata G, Alcazar Romero PP et al. Evaluation of the utility of computer tomography in the initial assessment of the critical care patient with chest trauma. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1370-1375.
79. Schild HH, Strunk H, Weber W et al. Pulmonary contusion: CT vs plain radiograms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13: 417-420.
80. Soldati G, Giunta V, Sher S et al. Synthetic comets: a new look at lung sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 1762-1770.
81. Soldati G, Copetti R, Sher S. Sonographic interstitial syndrome: the sound of lung water. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 163-174.
302 oracic ultrasound
82. Soldati G, Testa A, Silva FR et al. Chest ultrasonography in lung contusion. Chest 2006; 130: 533-538.
83. Raghavendran K, Notter RH, Davidson BA et al. Lung contusion: inflammatory mechanisms and interaction with other injuies. Shock 2009; 32: 122-130.
84. Copetti R, Soldati G, Copetti P. Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pul­monary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2008; 6: 16.
85. Wanek S, Mayberry JC. Blunt thoracic trauma: flail chest pulmonary contusion and blast injury. Crit Care Clin 2004; 20: 71-81.
86. De Moya MA, Manolakaki D, Chang Y et al. Blunt pulmonary contusion: admission computed tomog­raphy scan predicts mechanical ventilation. J Trauma 2011; 71: 1543-1547.
87. Miller PR, Croce MA, Bee TK et al. ARDS after pulmonary contusion: accurate measurement of contu-ARDS after pulmonary contusion: accurate measurement of contu­sion volume identifies high-risk patients. J Trauma 2001; 51: 223-228.
88. Wagner RB, Crawford WO Jr, Schimpf PP et al. Quantitation and pattern of parenchymal lung injury in blunt chest trauma. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Comput Tomogr 1988; 12: 270-281.
89. Stern E. Imaging of blunt and penetrating trauma to the pulmonary parenchima. In: oracic Trauma and Critical Care (Karmy Jones R, Stern. E, Nathens A eds.). Kluver Acad. Press, Boston MA, 2002.
90. Hubner U, Schlicht W, Outzen S et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82: 1170-1173.
91. Fenkl R, von Garrel T, Knaepler H. Emergency diagnosis of sternum fracture with ultrasound. Unfallchirurg 1992; 95: 375-379.
92. You JS, Chung YE, Kim D et al. Role of sonography in the emergency room to diagnose sterna fractures. J Clin Ultrasound 2010; 38: 135-137.
93. Sirmali M, Turut H, Topcu S et al. A comprehensive analysis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J CT Surg 2003; 24: 133-138.
94. Flagel B, Luchette F, Reed R et al. Half a dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality. Surgery 2005; 138: 717-723.
95. Shanti CM, Carlin AM, Tyburski JC. Incidence of pneumothorax from intercostal nerve block for analgesia in rib fractures. J Trauma 2001; 51: 536-539.
96. Knottembelt JD, James MF, Bloomfield M. Intrapleural bupivacaine analgesia in chest trauma. A ran­domized double blind controller trial. Injury 1991; 22: 114-117.
97. Livingston DH. Prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 12S.
98. Richardson JD, Adams L, Flint LM. Selective management of flail chest and pulmonary contusion. Ann Surg 1982; 196: 481-487.
99. Zallen G, Moore EE, Johnson JL et al. Posthemorragic shock mesenteric limph primes circulating neu­trophils and provokes lung injury. J Surg Res 1999; 83: 83-89.
100. Pasquale M, Fabian TC. EAST ad hoc Committee on Practice Management Guideline Development. Practice management guidelines for trauma from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 1998; 44: 941.
101. Horton TG, Cohn SM, Heid MP et al. Identification of trauma patients at risk of thoracic aortic tear by mechanism of injury. J Trauma 2000; 48: 1008-1012.
102. Symbas PJ, Horsley SW, Symbas PN. Rupture of the ascending aorta caused by blunt trauma. Ann orac Surg 1998; 66: 113-117.
103. Fenner MN, Fisher KS, Sergel NL et al. Evaluation of possibile traumatic thoracic aortic injury using aortography and CT. Am Surg 1990; 56: 497-499.
104. Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K. Diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic injury 2007: still a nemesis. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64: 27-40.
oracic trauma 303
105. Asensio JA, Muray J, Demetriades D et al. Penetrating cardiac injuries: prospective one year preliminary report; an analysis of variables predicting outcome. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 24-29.
106. Symbas NP, Buongiorno PF, Symbas PN. Blunt Cardiac rupture: the utility of emergency department ultrasound. Ann orac Surg 1999; 67: 1274-1276.
107. Rozicki GS, Feliciano DV, Oschner CA et al. e role of ultrasound in patients with posible penetrating cardiac wounds: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 1999; 46: 543-549.
108. Patel AN, Brennig C, Cotner J et al. Successful diagnosis of penetrating cardiac injury using surgeon­performed sonography. Ann orac Surg 2003; 76: 2043-2046.
109. Desouza KA, Desouza NA, Pinto RM et al. Transthoracic echocardiogram is a useful tool in the hemo­dynamic assessment of patients with chest trauma. Am J Med Sci 2011; 341: 340-343.
110. Moore EE, Knudson MM, Burlew CC, Inaba K et al. Defining the limits of resuscitative emergency department thoracotomy: a contemporary estern Trauma Association perspective. J Trauma 2011; 70: 334-339.
111. Dolora A, Morando P, Pampaloni M. Electrocardiographic findings in 98 consecutive nonpenetrating chest injuries. Dis Chest 1967; 52: 50-56.
113. Adams JE, Devila Roman VG, Bessey PQ et al. Improved detecton o cardiac contusion with cardiac troponin I. Am Heart J 1996; 131: 308-312.
114. Rozicky GS, Feliciano DV, Ochsner MG et al. e role of ultrasound in patients with possibile pen­etrating cardiac wounds: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 1999: 46: 543-551.
115. Plummer D, Brunnette D, Asinger R et al. Emergency department echocardiography improves outcome in penetrating cardiac injury. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 709-712.
116. Symbas PN. Traumatic heart disease. In: Hurst’s e Heart (Fuster V, Alexander RW, O’Rourke RA eds.). McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004, pp. 2225-2230.
117. Miller FA, Steward JB, Gersh BJ et al. Two dimensional echocardiographic findings in cardiac trauma. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50: 1022-1027.
118. Pretre R, Bednarkiewicz M, Faidutti B. Blunt cardiac injury: in achieving a practical diagnostic clas­sification. J Trauma 1994; 36: 462-463.
119. Rozicky GS, Feliciano DV, Schmidt JA et al. e role of surgeon performed ultrasound in patients with possibile cardiac wounds. Ann Surg 1996; 223: 737-746.
120. Smith RS, Chang FC. Traumatic rupture of the aorta: still a lethal injury. Am J Surg 1986; 152: 660-663.
121. Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Buell J et al. Use of spiral computer thomography for the essessment of blunt trauma patients with potential aortic injury. J Trauma 1998; 45: 922-930.
122. Brooks SW, Young JC, Cmolik B et al. e use of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of chest trauma. J Trauma 1992; 32: 761-765.
123. Patel NH, Stephens KE, Mirvis SE et al. Imaging of acute thoracic aortic injury due to blunt trauma: a review. Radiology 1998; 209: 335-348.
124. Rodriguez Morales G, Rodriguez A, Shatney CH. Acute rupture of the diaphragm in blunt trauma: analysis of 60 patients. J Trauma 1986; 26: 438-444.
125. Sharma OP. Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: not an uncommon entity-personal experience with collective review of the 1980’s. J Trauma 1989; 29: 678-682.
126. Shackleton KL, Stewart ET, Taylor AJ. Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: spectrum of radiographic findings. Radiographics 1998; 18: 49-59.
127. Kaewlai R, Avery LL, Asrani AV, Novelline RA. Multidetector CT of blunt thoracic trauma. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1555-1570.
128. Ammann AM, Breer WH, Maull KI, Walsch JW. Traumatic rupture of the diaphragm: real time sono­graphic diagnosis. AJR 1983; 140: 915-916.
304 oracic ultrasound
129. Kangarloo H, Sukov R, Sample F et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of iuxtadiaphragmatic masses in children. Radiology 1997; 125: 785-787.
Updated Bibliography
Rodriguez RM, Anglin D, Langdorf MI, Baumann BM, Hendey GW, Bradley RN, Medak AJ, Raja AS, Juhn P, Fortman J, Mulkerin W, Mower WR. NEXUS chest: validation of a decision instrument for selective chest imaging in blunt trauma. JAMA Surg 2013;148:940-946.
Validation of the NEXUS Chest decision instrument, which may safely reduce the need for traditional chest imaging in blunt trauma patients older than 14 years.
Chung JH, Cox CW, Mohammed TL, Kirsch J, Brown K, Dyer DS, Ginsburg ME, Heitkamp DE, Kanne JP, Kaerooni EA, Ketai LH, Ravenel JG, Saleh AG, Shah RD, Steiner RM, Suh RD. ACR appropriateness criteria blunt chest trauma. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:345-351.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. is publication include an extensive analysis of current medical
Ku BS, Fields JM, Carr B, Everett WW, Gracias VH, Dean AJ. Clinician performed bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. West J Emerg Med. 2013;14:103-108.
Alrajab S, Youssef AM, Akkus NI, Caldito G. Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2013;17:R208.
Ianniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B, Miele V. First line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of EFAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Radiol Med 2014.
oracic ultrasound and EFAST are rapid and accurate diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumo­thorax. ese results support the previous Investigation in this field.
Oveland NP, Soreide E, Lossius HM, Johannesen F, Wemmelund KB, Aagaard R, Sloth E. e intrapleural volume threshold for ultrasound detection of pneumothoraces: an experimental study on porcine models. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013;21:11.
e mean threshold volume to confirm the diagnosis of pneumothorax using ultrasound is 18 ml (standard deviation of 13 ml). Lung ultrasound is very accurate in diagnosing small pneumthorax.
Bock JS, Benitez RM. Blunt cardiac injury. Cardiol Clin 2012;30:545-555.
A review on blunt cardiac trauma.
Williams SR, Perera P, Gharahbaghian L. e FAST and EFAST in 2013: Trauma ultrasonography: overview, practical techniques, controversies and new frontiers. Crit Care Clin 2014;30:119-150.
is article reviews important literature on the FAST and EFAST examination in adults.
Costantino M, Gosselin MV, Primack SL. e ABC’s of thoracic trauma imaging. Seminars Roentgen 2006;209-225.
Ziegler K, Feeney JM, Desai D, Sharpio D, Marshall WT, Twoig M. Retrospective review of the use and costs of routine chest X-rays in a trauma setting. Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes 2013;7:2.
Two papers addressing the use of chest X-ray and chest CT in the trauma setting.
10
Echocardiography
Today cardiac ultrasound may concern various specialists: cardiologists,
emergency physicians, intensivists, traumatologists, pediatricians and pulmonologists. ere is now evidence that echocardiography will im­prove the diagnostic potential in different settings with a positive impact on patient management
Cardiac ultrasound is integrated with thoracic ultrasound in a goal­directed multidistrict diagnostic approach, without any specialization distinction. is approach produces essential data, confirming the pres­ence of pericardial fluid, valvular abnormalities, and enlargement of the heart chambers.
In addition, it can directly define a rise in the central venous pressure, the global and segmental cardiac contractility and the pressure gradients in the heart chambers through the valves. Finally, echocardiography may indicate the etiology of altered hemodynamics (see Chapter 11).
1,2,3
.
Machines
In the last few years a wide variety of ultrasound machines for cardiovascular use have been developed. ey may be classified in four categories:
• Stationary high-end systems, fully equipped with 3D and other advanced modalities.
• Mobile systems, equipped with standard modalities and easily transportable inside health
care facilities.
• Portable machines offering essential modalities to perform a complete echo study.
• Pocket-size hand-held imaging devices.
Portable machines and pocket-size hand-held imaging devices are instruments useful for basic applications of echocardiography (Focused Cardiac Ultrasound). ey are used when echocardiography is limited in scope and problem-oriented (cardiovascular assessment to complement the physical examination).
Mobile systems are easily transported to the bedside and offer full range of standard echo modalities and measurements (M-Mode, 2D, Color, Pulsed and Continuous Dopppler, Tissue Doppler). A small, but complete echo machine with all conventional tools, is necessary for in­termediate or advanced bedside applications, or for a comprehensive hemodynamic assessment.
305
306 oracic ultrasound
e principles that affect the images of the heart in echocardiography, are those of general ultrasound2. However in echocardiography, the return ultrasonic signals can be converted into two types of representation: M-Mode and two-dimensional (2D).
In M-Mode scans a thin ultrasonic beam, immediately below the transducer, displays points generated by tissue interfaces with a variable brightness in relation to the acoustic impedance. e image generated allows to capture precise measurements related to the wall thickness, in a time motion (M) manner (plotting movements against time).
Moreover, M-Mode examination allows the evaluation of structures that move quickly, such as heart valves, with an accurate timing of cardiac events, correlated with ECG.
Two-dimensional images are more familiar to non-cardiologists. ey represent the cardiac anatomy in real time, as “salami slices”, with variously oriented sections through walls, septa and heart chambers. is kind of imaging highlights the heart anatomy, the cardiac kinetic, the systolic function or the presence of intracavitary masses.
Pulsed and continuous Doppler and color Doppler functions are essential for the evaluation of flows, gradients and to estimate valve areas.
In the following pages of this chapter reference will be made to two-dimensional ultrasonography.
Questions
e situations that emergency or ICU physicians often have to deal with, require instant answers to very specific questions (may a cardiac tamponade be the cause of a state of shock? May pulmonary embolism be the cause of severe dyspnea and hypoxemia?). Obtaining a rapid response to clinical questions of this type requires right decisions in a short time and it often impacts heavily on the patient outcome.
e knowledge required to perform goal-directed echocardiographic investigations is less complex and extensive than the systematic knowledge of the cardiologist4. In this context, questions about critical cases are simple and designed to quickly get essential information:
• Right ventricle: is it small? large? does it move?
• Left ventricle: is it small? large? does it move?
• Pericardium: is there fluid? is there tamponade?
• Valves: stenosis? regurgitation?
• Inferior vena cava: mobile? dilated?
• Lung: dry? wet?
is chapter is not meant to be a summary on echocardiography, for which we refer the reader to the many existing texts on the subject, but it rather wants to be a complement to pleural and lung ultrasound and a help to draw useful information for the management of some critical syndromes of emergency and intensive care medicine.
Methods of image capture
For cardiac ultrasound, sector transducers with median frequency of 3.5 MHz (2.5 to 5 MHz) are used.
Echocardiography 307
e probe is located in specific regions and generates standard sections of the heart and the roots of the great vessels. e calibration of the machine should be adjusted to a low dynamic range, so as to generate more black and white, and images appear on the screen inverted horizontally compared to the images in abdominal and pelvic ultrasound. e lung is the main obstacle for the visualization of the heart. It is therefore necessary to position the probe on the chest on the cardiac acoustic windows, that facilitate exploration.
ere are four acoustic windows for cardiac examination: subcostal, apical, parasternal and suprasternal (Figs. 1-4).
Figure 1 – Subcostal acoustic window.
Figure 2 – Apical acoustic window.
Figure 3 – Parasternal acoustic window.
308 oracic ultrasound
Figure 4 – Suprasternal acoustic window.
To obtain the subcostal scan the probe is placed in the epigastrium and directed toward the left shoulder. For the apical scan, it is placed at the tip heartbeat, in the 4th-6th left inter­costal space along the mid-clavicular line and directed toward the right shoulder. To obtain the parasternal scan, it is placed in the 2nd-5th intercostal space along the left parasternal line. Finally, for the suprasternal scan the probe is located at the level of the jugular notch.
For each of these approaches the visualization of the heart will be possible according to dif­ferent projections: long axis, short axis, 4 and 5 chambers axis5 (Fig. 5).
PARASTERNAL
SUBCOSTAL
4 CHAMBERS
SHORT AXIS
LONG AXIS
APICAL
Figure 5 – Approaches and axis for the visualization of the heart.
Subcostal scans
e subcostal scan allows visualization of the heart through different angles and scanning planes.
Echocardiography 309
Orientation along the short axis
Starting from a scan aligned with the course of the caval veins, continuous projections are performed in the cranio-caudal and medial-lateral direction, from the base to the apex of the heart.
. L     (F. ) (C ).
LIVER
RIGHT ATRIUM
Figure 6 – Subcostal scan: long axis vena cava.
Clip 1 – Subcostal long axis caval vein scan.
. S    (F. ) (C ).
INFERIOR VENA CAVA
RIGHT ATRIUM
SUPERIOR VENA
CAVA
RIGHT VENTRICLE
PULMONARY ARTERY
Figure 7 – Subcostal scan: short axis aorta.
Clip 2 – Subcostal short axis aorta scan.