Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_612_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
67 Мб
Скачать
The gracilis assists with hip adduction, knee flexion, and knee internal rotation. Consequently, loss of this muscle may result in a decrease in hip adduction strength, but this is often not noticed by patients.23 A notable portion may also experience numbness in the area of the obturator nerve.
The scar burden may be adjusted depending on the position of the skin paddle with more posteriorly and superiorly based flaps being less visible. In the case of skin paddles close to the gluteal crease, care must be taken to avoid distorting the crease or causing difficulty with sitting because of posterior cutaneous nerve dysesthesia. Flap design must also take into consideration of the lower extremity lymphatic system, with more medial flaps at higher risk for lymphedema.
Anterolateral Thigh Flap
The thigh is a versatile donor site from which muscle, myocutaneous, adipofascial, fascial, and fasciocutaneous flaps can be harvested. The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is most commonly known as a perforator flap supplied by the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery via the profunda femoris artery. The flap can be harvested as a true perforator flap or may include part of or the entire vastus lateralis muscle if additional bulk is needed. If desired, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve can be included for sensory reinnervation.
Indications
The ALT flap is a commonly used flap that can provide large and pliable coverage anywhere in the body. The skin paddle can be as large as 8 by 25 cm with primary closure or even larger with skin graft closure. Like the RFFF, it is a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction and is often chosen over the RFFF if the defect is larger or if increased bulk is desired. It can be limited by its thickness in more obese patients; a fascia-only flap or flap thinning may be utilized in these cases, but alternate flaps may be more beneficial if a thinner flap is needed. The ALT flap is also beneficial for lower extremity reconstruction, particularly if patients would like to restrict surgery to one area of the body.
Surgical Technique
https://t.me/med1917
The most important landmarks for ALT harvest are the supralateral corner of the patella and the most prominent point of the anterior superior iliac spine. The line between these two points permits approximation of the septum between the rectus femoris and the vastus lateralis, in which the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral pedicle is found. Perforators can typically be found near and within 5 cm proximally and distally of the midpoint of this line. A handheld Doppler may be used to detect these perforators. The skin paddle should be designed over the desired perforators.
The medial incision of the skin paddle is typically made first, down to the fascia of the rectus femoris muscle, which is also incised. Lateral subfascial dissection facilitates identification of the septum between the rectus femoris and the vastus lateralis. Septocutaneous vessels, if present and notable, are found exiting this septum and can be traced back to the pedicle. Otherwise, musculocutaneous perforators are identified with continued exposure of the vastus lateralis and should be seen piercing the muscle fascia and going into the subcutaneous tissue and skin. If muscle is not required or desired, the chosen musculocutaneous perforators are dissected away from the muscle back to the origin of the descending lateral circumflex femoral pedicle. Once this is performed, the lateral aspect of the skin paddle is adjusted as necessary to include the perforators and then incised to complete the flap harvest.
Donor Site Considerations
Dissection of the flap, even if small, often requires a large incision. If the amount of skin required is larger than what can permit primary closure of the thigh, a skin graft may be used, but is often unesthetic and in an area that is frequently seen by the patient. In addition, a significant proportion of patients may experience numbness in the distribution of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.36 If a notable portion of the vastus lateralis is taken, patients may experience lower extremity weakness or instability, but studies have shown that this typically resolves.
36,37
CONCLUSIONS
https://t.me/med1917
A solid foundation in the principles of flap surgery is an essential tool for all reconstructive surgeons. Continued advances in the understanding of anatomy and surgical techniques have made the possibilities of tissue transfer nearly endless. Ultimate flap selection should be guided by an informed multidisciplinary discussion between the patient’s care team and the patient with a focus on how to manage the patient’s reconstructive needs in the context of their comorbidities and desires with minimal donor site morbidity and maximal restoration of form and function.
QUESTIONS
1. You are presented with a 65-year-old woman with a history of vulvar cancer previously treated with radical vulvectomy and reconstruction with bilateral pedicled ALT flaps complicated by recurrence with a large fungating tumor for which a palliative pelvic exenteration with a left-sided double-barrel wet ostomy has been performed. The resultant perineal defect is approximately 10 × 8 cm and significant dead space remains in the pelvis. Which of the following flaps represents the best option in this circumstance?
a. Pedicled right transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous
flap
b. Pedicled right vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap
c. Pedicled diagonal upper gracilis flap
d. Free latissimus dorsi free flap
2. A 35-year-old woman with a BMI of 24 is diagnosed with breast cancer and is planning on undergoing a unilateral mastectomy. She is interested in autologous breast reconstruction with a thigh-based flap. A diagonal upper gracilis (DUG) flap is planned. When harvesting the flap, the vascular pedicle can be found between which two muscles?
a. Rectus femoris and vastus lateralis b. Adductor longus and sartorius
c. Adductor longus and adductor magnus
d. Vastus medialis and semimembranosus
https://t.me/med1917
3. A 48-year-old transgender female-to-male patient is interested in undergoing phalloplasty using a radial forearm free flap. Which of the following nerves should be included to provide tactile and erogenous sensation?
a. Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve b. Radial nerve
c. Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve
d. Obturator nerve
ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS
1. Answer: b.  A pedicled right vertical rectus abdominis
myocutaneous (VRAM) is the best option in this case. A vertically rather than a transversely oriented flap would be better able to reach the posterior aspect of the defect. A transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap would also affect the left side of the abdomen, which would not be ideal given left-sided ostomy. A gracilis flap could potentially fill the defect, but the additional bulk from a rectus abdominis muscle would better fill the dead space left behind by the pelvic exenteration. A free flap would result in unnecessary morbidity when pedicled options are available, particularly in the case of a palliative procedure.
2. Answer: c.  The gracilis muscle is a Mathes and Nahai type II muscle with a dominant blood supply from the descending branch of the medial circumflex femoral artery via the profunda femoris artery. The pedicle can be identified approximately 10 cm distal to the pubic symphysis between the adductor longus and adductor magnus muscles.
3. Answer: a.  The radial forearm free flap should be neurotized using the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Care must be taken to preserve the sensory branches of the radial nerve when harvesting the flap. The obturator nerve innervates the gracilis muscle and can be used when a functional free flap is required.
https://t.me/med1917
REFERENCES
1. McGregor IA, Morgan G. Axial and random paern flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1973;26(3):202-213.
2. Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40(2):113-141.
3. Ghali S, Butler PEM, Tepper OM, Gurtner GC. Vascular delay revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(6):1735-1744.
4. Hamilton K, Wolfswinkel EM, Weathers WM , et al. The delay phenomenon: a compilation of knowledge across specialties. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;7(2):112-118.
5. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67(2):177-187.
6. Pontén B. The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg. 1981;34(2):215-220.
7. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their paerns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37(1):80-87.
8. Wei FC, Jain V, Suominen S, Chen HC. Confusion among perforator flaps: what is a true perforator flap? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(3):874-876.
9. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42(6):645-648.
Surg. 2020;34(3):133-138.
Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44(1):53-54.
https://t.me/med1917
perforator flap for coverage of ischial or trochanteric pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(5):540-542.
reconstructive surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(3):112-120.
in clinical use. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30(3):457-467.
2004;114(4):910-916.
flaps: clinical results and vascular anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1589-1603.
supermicrosurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30(1):53-58.
microsurgery and perforator flaps. Paper presented at. First International Course on Perforator Flap and Arterialized Skin Flaps (Special Invited Lecture). 1997.
applications. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118(5):832-839.
Surg. 1971;38(1):61-63.
for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(1):73-81.
disability following reconstruction with the pectoralis major pedicled flap. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(6):1129-1134.
pectoralis major myocutaneous flap harvest. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(3):467-471.
https://t.me/med1917
morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(5):322-330.
epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(5):1077-1083; discussion 1084-1085.
Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery (SIEA) and its angiosome: a clinical anatomical study. Microsurgery. 2010;30(5):386-391.
thoracodorsal artery perforator flap: anatomic basis and clinical application. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51(1):23-29.
reconstruction. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014;5(3):181-187.
transplantation: a report of 56 cases. 1981. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(3):162-165.
the radial forearm flap really the standard technique? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):510-518.
flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(4):e1287.
donor-site complications and morbidity: a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(1):109-115.
Upper Gracilis (DUG) flap: a safe and improved alternative to the TUG flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4S-1):33-34.
femoris artery perforator flap: a new option for autologous breast
https://t.me/med1917
reconstruction—a cadaveric and computer tomography angiogram study. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2012;28(6):381-386.
perforator flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(10):e2463.
morbidity after anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous free flap harvest in 220 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):209-214.
found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2219-2226; discussion 2227-2230.
https://t.me/med1917
CHAPTER 8 Principles of Nerve Repair and Reconstruction
and Neuroma Management
Lisa Gfrerer and Kyle R. Eberlin
KEY POINTS
Nerve injuries can result in motor weakness, numbness, chronic pain, and phantom sensations depending on the nerve affected and injury grade. Surgeons should consider all four domains in the treatment of affected patients.
The diagnostic workup for nerve injury may include a history and physical examination, imaging with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as electrodiagnostic studies and diagnostic nerve blocks.
The most important aspect of nerve repair is coaptation without tension after debridement of unhealthy neural tissue. Based on this principle, several surgical techniques including direct coaptation, repair with conduits, as well as autograft and allograft reconstruction are available to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.
Treatment of neuropathic pain is multidisciplinary. The role of the surgeon is to identify and treat nerve compression, nerve injury (neuroma), and musculoskeletal injury/inflammation.
The most common surgical techniques to treat neuropathic pain include burying in muscle, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, targeted muscle reinnervation, and relocation nerve grafting.
PRINCIPLES OF NERVE INJURY
Peripheral nerve injuries occur through different mechanisms including sharp or blunt trauma, stretch injury, and compression. The degree of nerve injury influences the severity of the resulting deficits, the chances of recovery, and the treatment approach (see Table 8.1 and Figure 8.1).1 Functionally, disruption of nerve tissue results in varying degrees of motor weakness, numbness, chronic pain, and phantom sensations. Therefore, surgeons should consider all four of these domains in the treatment of affected patients.
TABLE 8.1. CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURIES IS BASED ON THE LEVEL OF ANATOMIC DISRUPTION
Seddon Classification
Sunderland Classification
a
Nerve Anatomy
b
Myelin Axon Endoneurium Perineurium Epineuriu
Neurapraxia First degree + + + +
Axonotmesis Second
degree
+ + +
https://t.me/med1917
Third degree + +
Fourth degree +
Neurotmesis Fifth degree
Sixth degree ± ± ± ±
a
Degree of nerve injury determines likelihood of spontaneous recovery and/or need for surgical intervention.
b
+ Indicates structure is intact; − indicates structure is injured.
https://t.me/med1917