Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
32 Numerical Methodology forEvaluation ofResults inLiposuction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 32.1 Bidigital maneuver measure of the thickness of the cutaneous fold in the medium­axillary line and abdomen
493
overaspiration, thus reducing the risks of complications such as irregularities, nod­ules, and adherences. At one month after surgery, when approximately 80% of the edema has already regressed (Hunstad and Aitken 2006), the patient is again sub­mitted to the measure of the cutaneous folds, and the values are compared against the preoperative data.
Results
Table 32.1 lists the preoperative and postoperative measurements in centimeters of the skinfolds of 20 patients. The mean measurements in centimeters of the skinfolds and the standard deviation for each patient were evaluated.
494
()
()
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. H. de Almeida et al.
Table 32.1
Comparison between the standard measurements and the mean values in centimeters
of the skinfolds analyzed in the study of liposuction, for each patient
Preoperative period Postoperative period (6 months)
Patient
Standarda (cm) Meanb (cm) STDEVcStandarda (cm) Meanb (cm) STDEV
1 1.0 3.75 1.66 1.4 1.95 0.77 2 1.7 3.45 2.02 1.2 1.77 0.42 3 1.2 3.70 1.69 0.7 1.54 0.62 4 1.3 4.42 2.02 X 2.02 0.79 5 2.0 5.36 2.25 2.3 2.65 0.62 6 0.9 3.27 1.51 X 2.26 0.34 7 1.1 2.9 1.33 1.9 2.1 0.63 8 1.5 3.16 1.00 1.6 2.22 0.50 9 2.0 3.56 1.54 2.0 2.28 0.34 10 2.3 3.56 1.28 1.5 1.87 0.65 11 1.2 4.05 1.94 1.1 2.1 0.73 12 1.0 3.2 1.4 1.0 1.74 0.8 13 2 4.05 1.41 1.6 2.22 0.54 14 2.5 5 1.88 2 2.23 0.39 15 1.5 4.68 2.68 1.8 2.5 0.55 16 0.8 3.07 1.73 1 1.9 0.55 17 1.2 4.73
2.72 1 1.55 0.64 18 1.2 4.02 2.06 1.2 1.85 0.52 19 1.7 3.18 1.67 1.5 1.7 0.47 20 x 4.25 1.77 1 2 1 Mean//STDEV 386 0.69 2.02 0.29
a
Standard: measured in centimeters from the skinfold corresponding to the medium-axillary line,
between the ninth and tenth ribs
b
Mean: arithmetic mean among all measurements, in centimeters, for each patient
c
 STDEV: standard deviation. The standard deviation is calculated by using the n-1 equation.
Finally, x is the sample mean of the data studied (value 1, value 2, etc.), and n is the sample size.
This function uses the following formula:
E
2
-
nxx-
1
c
Discussion
Ilouz (Illouz 1998) reported that complications in liposuction are divided into two parts. The rst one includes surgical and systemic alterations and complications that continue in the traditional technique (Illouz 1998). The second one includes unfa­vorable results and sequels, which are numerous and complex (Illouz 2006).
ab
cd
32 Numerical Methodology forEvaluation ofResults inLiposuction
https://t.me/medicina_free
495
Patients want the best possible results from plastic surgery (Augustin etal. 1999). Subjective evaluations can lead to conicting impressions between the surgeon and the patient. The use of a quantitative method for analysis makes a more-objective demonstration of the surgery results possible.
The method of measuring the skinfolds can be used during surgery to note thick­ness references for the abdominal and ank cutaneous folds after liposuction. Another advantage of the here-described method is its ease in demonstrating the eventual occurrence of ponderal gain with the increase in the subcutaneous tissue through the comparison of the measures in the immediate and late postoperative periods.
We have used this method in our service for the past 4 years with easy execution, at low cost, and with satisfactory results. The method is safer for plastic surgeons because it reduces conicts and improves doctor–patient relationships (Figs.32.2,
32.3, and 32.4).
Fig. 32.2 (a) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Pleat measurements of the skin in the preoperative period. Front position (front view). (b) Treatment areas on the abdomen. Preoperative skinfold measurements (oblique view). (c) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Pleat measurements of the skin in the postoperative period. Front position (front view). (d) Treatment areas on the abdomen. Postoperative skinfold measurements (oblique view)
496
de f
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. H. de Almeida et al.
a
b
c
de f
Fig. 32.3 (a) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Pleat measurements of the skin in the preoperative period. Front position (front view). (b) Treatment areas on the back. Preoperative skinfold mea­surements (rear view). (c) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Skinfold measurements in the preop­erative period (prole view). (d) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Pleat measurements of the skin in the postoperative period. Front position (front view). (e) Treatment areas on the back. Postoperative skinfold measurements (rear view). (f) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Skinfold measurements in the postoperative period (prole view)
ab c
Fig. 32.4 (a) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Pleat measurements of the skin in the preoperative period. Front position (front view). (b) Treatment areas on the back. Preoperative skinfold mea­surements (rear view). (c) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Skinfold measurements in the preop­erative period (prole view). (d) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Pleat measurements of the skin in the postoperative period. Front position (front view). (e) Treatment areas on the back. Postoperative skinfold measurements (rear view). (f) Treatment areas in the abdomen. Skinfold measurements in the postoperative period (prole view)
32 Numerical Methodology forEvaluation ofResults inLiposuction
https://t.me/medicina_free
497
Summary
Liposuction is the standard method for lipodystrophy treatment. However, the amplitude of areas to be treated sometimes makes it difcult to evaluate the periop­erative results. Measuring the skinfolds is anatomical work that allows for making pre-established mathematical comparisons for the patient. By applying this study method, surgeons can make more-objective demonstrations and exert a higher level of perioperative control over liposuction, which are associated with reducing patient complaints, asymmetries, and levels of hypocorrection in their respective treat­ment areas.
References
Souza Pinto EB, Abdalla PCSP, Maciel CM (2005). História da lipoaspiração. In: Carrerão S,
Cardim V, Goldenberg D, eds. Cirurgia Plástica. São Paulo: Atheneu; cap.6. Toledo LS, Giovannetti M (2003). Lipoaspiração e lipoenxertia nas deformidades do abdômen,
dorso e ancos. In: Mélega JM, ed. Cirurgia Plástica: fundamentos e arte- cirurgia estética.
Rio de Janeiro: Medsi. p.629-38. Coleman WP (2000) 3rd. Powered liposuction. Dermatol Surg.; 26(4):315-8. Pollack SV (1999). Liposuction of the abdomen. The basics. Dermatol Clin. 17(4):823-34. Illouz YG (2006). Complications of liposuction. Clin Plast Surg. ;33(1): 129-63. Illouz YG (1998). Lipesculpture et chirurgie de la silhouette. Chirurgie plastique reconstructrice
et esthétique. Encycl Med Chir Edidions Scientiques et Médicales. Paris: Elsevier. p.45-120. Hunstad JP, Aitken ME (2006). Liposuction: techniques and guidelines. Clin Plast Surg.
;33(1):13-25. Chang KN (2004). The use of intraoperative grid pattern markings in lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr
Surg.;114(5):1292-7. Avelar J, Illouz YG (1986) Anatomia cirúrgica e distribuição do tecido celular no organismo
humano. In: Lipoaspiração. Rio de Janeiro:Hipocrates; p.45-57. Duarte AC, Castellani FR (2002). Medidas antropométricas. In: Semiologia nutricional. São Paulo:
Axcel Books do Brasil; p.34-57. Mendez BM, Coleman JE, Kenkel JM (2019). Optimizing Patient Outcomes and Safety With
Liposuction. Aesthet Surg J.; 39(1):66-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy151. Collins PS, Moyer KE (2018). Evidence-Based Practice in Liposuction. Ann Plast Surg.; 80 (6S
Suppl 6): S403-S405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001325. Chia CT, Neinstein RM, Theodorou SJ (2017). Evidence-Based Medicine: Liposuction. Plast
Reconstr Surg.; 139(1):267e-274e. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002859. Augustin M, Zschocke I, Sommer B, Sattler G (1999). Sociodemographic prole and satisfac-
tion with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent local anesthesia. Dermatol
Surg; 25(6):480-3.
Chapter 33
https://t.me/medicina_free
Laser Lipolysis: Skin Tightening inLipoplasty Using HPL Dual Diode Laser
MoisésWolfenson, LydiaMassakoFerreira, JoaquimFigueiredo, andBrunaAlves
Abstract Background: To present the changes in the dimension of the skin, obey-
ing the safety parameters related to the energy accumulated in laser lipolysis proce­dures in different anatomical regions, using a double-wavelength diode laser device (924 and 975 nm).
Method: A prospective, cross-sectional case series study included 552 patients submitted to laser lipolysis for the treatment of facial and body contouring deformi­ties between June 2008 and June 2019. Laser lipolysis was performed with a diode laser device with two independently controlled wavelengths, one of them operating at 924nm and the other at 975 nm, using tips of three sizes according to suitability for small, medium, or large areas of treated adipose tissue. The measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test, at a signicance level of 0.05. The most impor­tant retractions occurred at the waist circumference, at the level of the umbilical scar—measured with a tape measure before and 90 days after the laser—and the second largest retraction at submental region: measured by parking meter in lines L2 and L3, before the application of double laser and after 90 days.
Results: In all these patients, there was signicant skin retraction regardless of the surgical site (face, breast adiposity, arms, or waist), and the only complications that existed were erythema and edema that disappeared within 30 days after the laser.
Conclusion: The diode laser proved to be able to promote progressive and per­sistent skin retraction, obeying the proposed safety parameter.
Keywords Lipectomy/methods · Laser therapy · Plastic surgery
M. Wolfenson (*) Avenida Boa Viagem, Recife, PE, Brazil
L. M. Ferreira · J. Figueiredo · B. Alves São Paulo, Brazil
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_33
499© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
500
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. Wolfenson et al.
Introduction
Almost all people have a body contour imperfection or deformity that causes dis­comfort or embarrassment. These deformities may result from normal and inevita­ble physiologic changes, such as those associated with repeated weight loss, localized fat deposits, and aging laxity. Other deformities may be associated with cosmetic failure of corrective procedures, such as conventional liposuction, plastic procedures, or augmentation lipoplasty.
Until recently, lipoplasty was commonly associated with postoperative compli­cations, including bruising, decreased hematocrit resulting from signicant blood loss, scarring caused by cannula insertion and friction with the skin that may be difcult or impossible to correct, or even sequelae such as changes in skin texture and skin waviness, among others (Triana etal. 2009). These complications were a challenge to plastic surgeons and served as a stimulus for the development of devices that allow partial or even total correction of skin deformities and body con­tour and that have become increasingly safe. At present, laser lipolysis may be per­formed using a dual-wavelength diode laser to facilitate liposuction by nonaggressive techniques.
The photothermal effect of laser irradiation on the hypodermis is used for heat­ing fat cells, leading to membrane rupture, consequent release of intracellular lipase, and fat liquefaction, which facilitates liposuction. In addition, the heating of brous septa and reticular dermis causes tissue thinning, leading to an improved aesthetic result. The photothermal properties of the laser light may also be applied for cauter­izing small blood vessels, decreasing at the surgical site.
Photothermal effects have been used in the development of devices for laser lipolysis operating at different wavelengths in the range of the absorption spectra of fat, water, and other chromophore associations. The dual-wavelength diode laser is one of the devices available for lipolysis. It operates at 924 nm, which is a wave­length specic for liquefying adipose tissue, and at 975 nm, which is a wavelength that acts on collagen and elastin bers in the deep dermis. This system preserves the epidermis, thus eliminating most risks associated with its use.
The use of devices for laser lipolysis requires attention during the surgical proce­dure regarding the total energy transmitted by the laser to each region of the body, the so-called cumulative energy, for the best aesthetic result by the remodeling of brous conjunctive tissue. The control of the cumulative energy is essential to reduce risk of complications, such as necrosis, prolonged erythema, hyperchromic skin patches, secondary bacterial infection, and dyschromia.
This topic has been studied to determine the safety parameters for preventing treatment complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin tightening after laser lipolysis using a dual-wavelength laser operating at 924 and 975nm.
Even with excellent results in skin retractions on the face and body contouring with the use of laser, for cases of excessive accidity, we have rhytidectomy and abdominal dermolipectomy referred to as state of the art in our study.
33 Laser Lipolysis: Skin Tightening inLipoplasty Using HPL Dual Diode Laser
https://t.me/medicina_free
501
Patients andMethods
This prospective, cross-sectional study was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee and performed in accordance with Resolution 196/96 of the Brazilian National Health Council (Conselho Nacional de Saúde) and the Brazilian Ethical Review System on Research Involving Human Beings. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before their inclusion in the study, and ano­nymity was ensured.
The study was conducted between June of 2008 and July of 2019. Participants were recruited from consecutive patients meeting the study criteria referred by the Plastic Surgery Outpatient Clinic of the Federal University of Pernambuco General Hospital to the Multi-Aesthetic Clinic (Clínica Multiplástica) in Recife, Brazil, and the study was sent and approved to the CEP of UFPE (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco).
Inclusion criteria were skin laxity after plastic surgery, sequelae after primary liposuction, submental adiposity, arm adiposity, gynecomastia, and laxity in the area around the umbilicus. Exclusion criteria were previous fat grafting, laxity after bariatric surgery with indication for plastic surgery, infection in general, diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, and cancer.
The study included 552 patients. All these patients are women who used laser lipolysis for the treatment of deformities of the face and body contour with a mean age of 53.4 years (between 35 and 62 years) and a body mass index ranging from
18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 and were included in the study and underwent laser lipolysis to correct contour deformities.
Laser lipolysis was performed using a dual-wavelength diode laser (SlimLipo, Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, Mass., licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency) operating at two wavelengths (924 and 975 nm) independently controlled for different out­put powers.
Three different tip lengths (80, 180, and 280 mm) were used, allowing treatment of small (submental region), medium (brachial region), and large (ank and abdom­inal regions) areas of adipose tissue. Before the procedure, 10 × 10 cm areas (100cm2) were marked on the skin with a bright green marker (Fig.33.1).
The circumference of each treated body region was measured carefully at three time points (preoperatively, immediately after laser lipolysis, and on postoperative day 90). For the face, three lines (lines 1, 2, and 3) were measured at the three time points. Line 1 extended from the corner of the mouth (cheilion) to the lateral palpe­bral commissure (exocanthion) of the same side of the face; line 2 was constructed from the central part of the chin region (mental protuberance) to the inferior inser­tion of the earlobe (otobasion inferius); and line 3 connected the right otobasion inferius to the left otobasion inferius, passing through the submental area (Fig.33.2).
Photographic documentation with standardized views, taken from the same dis­tance with the same camera (Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P10, Sony, Tokyo, Japan), was also obtained from all patients at the three time points. A total energy dose of 5 kJ
502
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 33.1 Laser lipolysis performed in (above) the abdominal region showing one 10 × 10cm skin area, with the diode laser programmed for a cumulative energy of 5 kJ, and (below) in a right arm marked with two 10 × 10 cm skin areas, with the diode laser programmed for a cumulative energy of 8 kJ
Fig. 33.2 Diagram showing the position of the lines used in measurements of the face performed preoperatively, immediately after laser lipolysis, and on postoperative day 90. L line
M. Wolfenson et al.
(5000 J) per 100cm2 skin area was used as a safety parameter to prevent treatment complications. The optimal cumulative energy, which is proportional to the contour deformity, was estimated based on the number of 10 × 10cm skin areas within the treatment region. For example, a cumulative energy of 5 kJ would be delivered to a patient with a small brachial region (10 × 10 cm), whereas 15 kJ would be delivered to a patient with a large brachial region (10 × 30 cm), resulting in liquefaction of adipose tissue and skin tightening (Fig.33.3).
In our sample, the patients were operated with a double diode HPL laser 924 and 975 nm, with high power and surgical laser. There were 552 female patients in 11 years, from June 2008 to June 2019. The mean age of patients is 53.4 years. 74.7%
33 Laser Lipolysis: Skin Tightening inLipoplasty Using HPL Dual Diode Laser
https://t.me/medicina_free
503
Fig. 33.3 Sampling of 552 patients, women, treated with double-wavelength diode laser—924 and 975nm
are white and 54.7% married. In 154 patients, a laser with a wavelength of 924nm was used to reduce sagging in the face.
Results
The distribution of the 552 patients who underwent laser lipolysis, according to the different treated body regions, is shown in Fig.33.4. Laser lipolysis was mostly performed on the ank region, followed by the facial or submental region. Parameters such as cumulative energy, output power, and sequence of wavelengths used during laser lipolysis in the different regions of the body are listed in Table33.1.
Measurements of the circumference of treated body regions taken preoperatively, immediately after laser lipolysis, and 90 days postoperatively are shown in Table33.2. The results showed a progressive tightening of the skin over time at all treated sites.
Signicant differences in circumference values were observed in all patients between preoperative and immediate postoperative measurements and between measurements from postoperative day 90 and both the preoperative and immediate