Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
22 Breast Anomalies: Diagnosis andTreatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
357
Poland Syndrome
Poland syndrome was rst described by Alfred Poland in 1841. After performing an autopsy on a patient, Poland, who was an anatomy instructor at Guy’s Hospital, observed the absence of the sternocostal portion of the pectoralis major muscle and malformations in the ipsilateral upper limb.
The etiology of Poland syndrome is still unknown. However, studies suggest that there may be a genetic inuence or even that extrinsic factors, between the sixth and the eighth week of pregnancy, may interfere with the migration process of the pec­toralis major muscle and the separation of the ngers that occurs in this period.
However, the manifestations of PS are more frequently observed in adolescence, progressing with breast hypoplasia, asymmetry of the nipple-areola complexes, and depression of the affected hemithorax. At this stage, these deformities generate a high degree of anxiety in patients with serious psychosocial repercussions. Therefore, it is common to search for medical advice to be made for merely aes­thetic purposes. When the changes are restricted to the pectoralis major muscle and breast hypoplasia, cases are often diagnosed as breast asymmetry. Based on the above, the disease presents with a wide range of manifestations (Poland 1841; Larizza and Maghnie 1990; Beals and Crawford 1976; David and Winter 1985; Rasjad and Sutiaksa 1991; Marks et al. 1991; Ribeiro et al. 2009; Seyfer et al. 2010).
Regarding surgical options, Ribeiro and Seyfer propose different approaches depending on the degree of presentation of each case. Thus, in the mild form (rst degree) of the disease (Fig.22.5), the inclusion of breast implants is the best option in adult patients. In adolescents, on the other hand, due to breast growth, the inclu­sion of an expander prosthesis is prudent. In moderate cases (second degree), it may
Fig. 22.5 Poland syndrome (I mild)
358
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 22.1 Poland syndrome classication
Breast
Classication
1 (mild) Breast
2 (moderate) Hypomastia Absent Absent Absent 3 (severe) Amastia Different
anomalies
asymmetry
Thoracic wall deformities
Absent Absent Absent
deformities
Ipsilateral arm alterations
Present Present
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Other congenital deformities
be necessary to expand the tissue beforehand and then include customized or non­customized implants, with coverage of local aps or even distant aps. In very severe cases (third degree), the use of implants is always accompanied by a latissi­mus dorsi myocutaneous ap or another ap such as a microsurgical or pedicled rectus abdominis ap,either way, additional procedures in the contralateral breast, such as symmetrization and/or the nipple-areola complex are almost always needed. In Table22.1, the authors summarized the deformities present in mild, moderate, and severe presentations of Poland syndrome.
References
American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic surgery national databank statistics:
expanded data for 2010. Available at http://www.surgery.org. Accessed May 5, 2011. Zuckerman D, Abraham A.Teenagers and cosmetic surgery: Focus on breast augmentation and
liposuction. J Adolesc Health 2008; 43:318–324. Schilder P.Localization of the body image (postural model of the body). Res Publ Assoc Nerv
Ment Dis. 1934; 13:466–585. Simis KJ, Hovius SE, de Beaufort ID, Verhulst FC, Koot HM.After plastic surgery: Adolescent-
reported appearance ratings and appearance-related burdens in patient and general population
groups. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109:9–17. Simis KJ, Koot JM, Verhulst FC, Hovius SE.Assessing adolescents and young girls for plastic sur-
gical intervention: Pre-surgical appearance ratings and appearance-related burdens as reported
by adolescents and young adults, parents and surgeons. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:593–600. Simis KJ, Verhulst FC, Koot JM.Body image, psychosocial functioning, and personality: How
different are adolescents and young adults applying for plastic surgery? J Child Psychol
Psychiatry 2001;42:669–678. Malata, C.M., Boot, J.C., Bradbury, E.T., Ramli, A.R., and Aharpe, D.T. Congenital breast
asymmetry: Subjective and objective assessment. Br. J.Plast. Surg. 47: 95, 1994 Schmidt, H. Supernumerary nipples: Prevalence, size, sex and side predilection. A prospective
clinical study. Eur. J.Pediatr. 157: 821, 1998. Gilmore, H.T., Milroy, M., and Mello, B.J. Supernumerary nipples and accessory breast tissue.
S.D.J.Med. 49: 149, 1996. Grossl, N.A. Supernumerary breast tissue: Historical perspectives and clinical features. South.
Med. J. 93:29, 2000. Simmons, R.M., Cance, W.G., and Iacicca, M.V. A giant juvenile broadenoma in a 12-year-old
girl: A case for breast conservation. Breast J. 6: 418, 2000. Sugai, M., Murata, K., Kimura, N., Munakata, H., Hada, R., and Kamata, Y.Adenoma of the nipple
in an adolescent. Breast Cancer 9: 254, 2002.
22 Breast Anomalies: Diagnosis andTreatment
https://t.me/medicina_free
Hsieh, S.C., Chen, K.C., Chu, C.C., and Chou, J.M. Juvenile papillomatosis of the breast in a
9-year-old girl. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 17: 206, 2001. Selamzde, M., Gidener, C., Koyuncuoglu, M., and Mevsim, A.Borderline phylloides tumor in an
11-year-old girl. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 15: 427, 1999. Murphy, J.J., Morzaria, S., Gow, K.W., and Magee, J.F. Breast cancer in a 6-year-old child.
J.Pediatr. Surg. 35: 765, 2000. Lin, K.Y., Nguyen, D.B., and Williams, R.M.Complete breast absence revisited. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg. 106: 98, 2000. Smith, D.J., Palin, W. E., Katch, V., and Bennett, J.E. Surgical treatment of congenital breast
asymmetry. Ann. Plast. Surg. 47: 92, 1986. Rees, T.D., and Aston, S.The tuberous breast. Clin. Plast. Surg. 3: 339, 1976. Meara, J.G., Kokker, A., Bartlett, G., Theile, R., Mutimer, K., and Holmes, A.D. Tuberous breast
deformity: Principles and practice. Ann. Plast. Surg. 4S: 607, 2000. Poland A.Deciency of the pectoral muscles. Guy’s Hospital Reports. 1841; 6:191. Larizza D, Maghnie M.Poland’s syndrome associated with growth hormone deciency. J Med
Genet. 1990; 27: 53-55. Beals KR, Crawford S.Congenital absence of the pectoral muscle. Clin Orth Relat Res. 1976;
119:166-171. David TJ, Winter RM.Familial absence of the pectoralis major, serratus anterior, and latissimus
dorsi muscles. J Med Genet. 1985; 22: 390-392. Rasjad C, Sutiaksa IGP.A case report of Poland’s syndrome from Indonesia. Aust N Z J Surg.
1991; 61: 320-322. Marks MW, Argenta LC, Izenberg PH, Louis GB.Management of the chest-wall deformity in male
patients with Poland’s syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991; 87: 674-678. Ribeiro, R.C., Saltz, R., Mangles, M.G.M., Koch, H.Clinical and radiographic classication of
Poland’s Syndrome—A proposal. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2009 29: 494 Seyfer, A.E., Fox, J.P., Hamilton, C.G. Poland Syndrome: Evaluation and Treatment of the Chest
Wall in 63 Patients. Plast Reconstruct Surg, 2010, 126(3):902-911
359
Chapter 23
https://t.me/medicina_free
Tuberous Breast
RicardoCavalcantiRibeiro, CarolinaDurán, andLuisFernandezde Córdova
Abstract Tuberous breast syndrome refers to a deformity of the breast clinically
presenting with hernia of the parenchyma through the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and may involve varying degrees of breast hypoplasia; it was so named for its similarity with the tuberous roots of plants. This condition affects young women and can bring on serious disorders of self-esteem and psychosocial distress.
The deformity is characterized by hypoplasia, breast base constriction, inferior breast skin deciency, superior malposition of the inframammary fold, areolar her­niation, increased areolar diameter, and asymmetry. This series of morphologic alterations become evident at puberty with a wide spectrum of expression.
The term was rst described in 1976 by Rees and Aston, and the exact incidence and prevalence are unknown, and the etiology is unclear, because of underdiagnosis and lack of clinical correlation in cases of breast asymmetry. Apparently, there is no
R. C. Ribeiro (*) Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Casa de Portugal Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil e-mail: rribeiro@centroin.net.br
C. Durán Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Casa de Portugal Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
L. F. de Córdova Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Casa de Portugal Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Plastic Surgery, México City, Mexico
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_23
361© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
362
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
family incidence, and the presence of a noxious stimulus early in pregnancy respon­sible for a failure in differentiation in a limited zone of the fetal thorax has not been established.
There are two hypotheses for this condition; one of them is the hormonal stimu­lus. It seems that the quality and quantity of the hormonal stimulus are not different from normal, but we know that it is in the lower quadrants which are the most affected that have less glandular tissue and less hormonal receptors.
The second hypothesis is an anomaly of the breast structures, which could be the abnormal supercial fascia, weakness of the periareolar supporting tissues, or a strong adherence between the dermis and the muscular plane at the lower quadrants of tubular breasts, which could restrict peripheral expansion of the breast, resulting in the tubular appearance due to forward tunnelization of breast tissue. Together, these theories describe how the supercial fascia thickening can cause constriction to the breast, combined with the absence of the supercial fascia under the areola predisposing to herniation.
Tuberous breast deformity presents itself in varying degrees, a classication for this degrees was rst published by von Heimburg in 1996 describing four types: type I, hypoplasia of the medial lower quadrant; type II, hypoplasia of both lower quadrants with sufcient skin in the subareolar region; type III, hypoplasia of both lower quadrants with deciency of skin in the subareolar region; and type IV, hypo­plasia of all quadrants with severe breast constriction.
There are numerous surgical techniques to correct this condition, most of them aimed at redistributing volumes based on a combination of skin expansion and mammary gland remodeling. Prostheses and locoregional aps can also be used to replace the missing volume. Fat grafting to the breast is another technique that has become popular. When combined with techniques such as external tissue expansion, the graft capacity ratio and recipient site vascularity increase, allowing for large graft volume.
Keywords Tuberous breast · Breast aesthetics · Hypoplastic breast
The term “tuberous breast” is used to dene a syndrome consisting of a hypoplastic alteration of the breast, where there is a base of insufcient diameter for the glandu­lar content, accompanied by a pseudo-herniation of the same through the areola, with a decit of skin wrap and a poorly positioned inframammary crease, which is usually located above the desired location, thus giving the tubular appearance that identies it (Ribeiro et al. 2018a, b). This entity is not recognized as a medical con­dition or actual disease but, apparently, has a strong association with other types of deformities, as elaborated in an article published by DeLuca-Pytell etal. This was a review of the incidence of tuberous breasts in 375 patients undergoing mammo­plasty who only sometimes presented mammary asymmetry. It was performed through a retrospective preoperative analysis and presented interesting results, for example, that 80.1% of patients who underwent mammoplasty had mammary
23 Tuberous Breast
https://t.me/medicina_free
asymmetry, and of the patients with asymmetry, 80.8% had some type of tuberous breast, compared with only about 7% of patients with symmetrical breasts. This strong association can provide the etiology, which remains unknown, and the devel­opment of optimal techniques for treatment.
363
History
The concept of tuberous breasts has been studied as a change in breast morphology since the last century, although Longacre (1954) and Goulian (1971) had studied this breast alteration and proposed its treatment with the use of a dermoadipose pedicle to enlarge the breast base. It was only in 1976 that Rees and Aston described it as a “tuberous breast” for the rst time. Several authors actively participated in search techniques for the correction of this abnormality, and so far, innovative tech­niques have been published with satisfactory results. Given that breasts identify a woman’s femininity and that their function is not limited to breastfeeding and rais­ing children and as they play a key role in sexual development and social accep­tance, we can consider it important that the changes they reach are harmonious in appearance or they can otherwise cause unwanted psychological conduct with fall­ing levels of self-esteem and stress of neurotic or bipolar disorders that could gener­ate a progressive and destructive dissatisfaction with a woman’s personal development.
Ribeiro etal. described a technique that uses an exclusive periareolar approach with horizontal incisions in the parenchyma and preparation of the inferior pedicle base, with resection of the medial and lateral extensions and xing of the same in the chest wall, folding the pedicle base on itself. This technique enables correction of the shape of the breasts by lling the lower hypoplastic quadrants (Ribeiro et al.
2018a, b, c, 2002; Jurado 1976; Pitanguy 1984; Robbins 1977; Rohrich et al. 2004;
Wallace et al. 1998).
In 2003, (Mandrekas et al. 2003) advocated a similar approach, but with a verti­cal incision in the parenchyma in a 6 o’clock semi-axis position and its separation into two pillars. Since 1983, the use of combined periareolar and inframammary incisions associated with breast implants has been described by Teimourian and Adham. Most patients with tuberous breast desire an increase in breast volume and improvement in shape, both of which are provided by this technique.
Since Coleman popularized lipolling technique, it has become a recognized therapeutic tool for soft tissue augmentation. Khouri made a signicant contribution with the introduction of external expansion to address the necessary capacity to graft ratio needed for successful outcomes. The number of sessions depends on the extent of the deformation, quality of the recipient site, and patients’ adipose reserves. The presence of brous tissue in tuberous breasts makes fat grafting more difcult to perform; using external tissue expansion might prepare the recipient site by alter­ing the brous aspect of the tissue, especially in the lower pole, which helps to accomplish the natural appearance and consistency of the breast.
364
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Embryology andAnatomy
Embryologically, breast development begins from the ectoderm in the fth week of intrauterine life, responsible for the close relations between the gland and the skin that becomes a real unit ensheathed by the mesenchyme. Between 10 and 14weeks, the mammary buds of the thoracic region are surrounded by a layer of mesodermal tissue called the supercial fascia. Both glandular and nipple-areolar growth is com­plete at puberty, and the supercial fascia is the main structure responsible for form­ing conical breasts.
The formation of the mammary gland begins before sexual differentiation. The development of the mammary ridge or milk line, which is a surface spread of embryonic ventral ectoderm, extending from the axilla to the inguinal bilaterally, begins by the fth week of embryonic life. The mammary crest, from which usually develops a single pair of mammary glands, disappears in human embryos at around the seventh week, persisting in only a small portion of the pectoral region. This involution of the milk crest is characteristic of the human species. Subsequently, there is invagination of the local ectoderm that will form the primary breast bud, which will give rise to 15 or 20 secondary branches. At rst, these sprouts, consist­ing of ectodermal cells, are massive and branch out into the middle of the mesen­chyme. In the third trimester of pregnancy, the ducts become tunneled, with a light appearance in their interior, open out into the mammary pits, which rise and form the nipple. The ramications of the ducts end in a blind bottom, constituting lobular duct units or cellular terminals. Breast engorgement and secretion of colostrum, due to hormonal stimulation from the mother through the placenta, occur in approxi­mately 80% of infants of both sexes. There is spontaneous regression of this phe­nomenon around the third or fourth week after birth, with the gradual elimination of hormones by the conceptus. Until the onset of puberty, the female breasts usually remain underdeveloped, starting development with ovarian stimulation that begins in this period. From then on, the development is glandular, together with the fat and connective tissue. During pregnancy, the development of the mammary glands is completed. Russo and Russo describe the development of the breasts, especially in their early years, to make the biological phenomena that govern the mammary epi­thelium comprehensible: nulliparous breasts consist of type I lobes, also called vir­gin lobes, because they are present before menarche. This type is the most undifferentiated. The lobes are formed of clusters of 6–11 ductules per lobe. Type II lobes are formed from the rst; they have a more complex morphology and are formed by a larger number of ductular structures per lobe. Type III are characterized by having an average of 80 ductules or wells per lobe. They are often found in women on hormone therapy and during pregnancy. Type IV lobes are considered the ultimate expression of development and differentiation. They are found during pregnancy and lactation and, furthermore, are not noticed in nulliparous women in the post-puberty period. This differentiation diminishes the possibility of breast
23 Tuberous Breast
https://t.me/medicina_free
365
cancer—a pregnancy to term before the age of 24, according to those authors, reduces the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer development fourfold. Changes in breast morphology can be divided according to the time they are diagnosed into congenital and development and from the pathophysiological point of view and functional morphology. But many of these morphological changes can coexist with functional problems; thus, the authors consider the rst classication more appropriate.
General Aspects
Clinical ndings: Tuberous or tubular breasts are characterized as:
– Deciency of glandular tissue plus elongation. – Enlargement and swelling of the NAC. – Constriction/herniation. – Narrow base. – Absence or poor lower pole. – Association with other congenital breast diseases (Figs.23.1, 23.2 and 23.3).
Fig. 23.1 Tuberous breast with asymmetry
366
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 23.2 Tuberous breast grade II
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Fig. 23.3 Tuberous breast grade III with asymmetry
23 Tuberous Breast
https://t.me/medicina_free
367
Classication
Morphologically, various proposals for tuberous breast classication have been described, one of which was advocated by Meara etal. (2000), which is most fre­quently used today. However, von Heimburg in 1996 presented a more rened ver­sion of this classication, which we consider adequate for academic purposes and is useful in comparing the postoperative results of procedures performed by different surgeons using different techniques to dene the degree of correction of the defect. Based on this classication, the deformities can be classied into type I (hypoplasia of the medial lower quadrant), type II (hypoplasia of both lower quadrants), and type III (hypoplasia of the four quadrants with severe breast constriction). These types of breast shape deformities have in common a breast base anomaly that results in different degrees of clinical severity.
Grolleau etal. (1999) proposed another classication, which divides the breast into four quadrants and determines three degrees of deformity. Grade I corresponds to 56% of the cases. The lack of development is limited to the lower internal quad­rant. The areola is deviated downward and inward, the volume of the breast being normal or hypertrophic. Grade II corresponds to 26% of the cases. The two lower quadrants are decient in their development. In these cases, the areola is deviated looking downward. Grade III corresponds to 18% of the cases. All quadrants are affected and decient, the mammary base is retracted, and the breast has a tuber or goat appearance.
Surgical Technique
With the patient in a semi-sitting position, a new areola is marked with the aid of 4–5cm in diameter areola marker. The new submammary fold is marked, normally positioned 1.5–2cm below the original.
The periareolar region is de-epithelialized in a donut fashion; the skin of the inferior half breast is incised and then undermined to pectoralis fascia (Fig.23.4). Dissection continues down to new inframammary fold and then upward behind the breast parenchyma (glandular aps Mandrekas/Ribeiro) (Fig.23.5).
Division of the breast into two aps is performed, one with a superior areolar pedicle and the other with an inferior pedicle, carefully releasing the medial and lateral extensions of the superior ap the subglandular pocket is created either for expanders or for permanent implants to be placed (Fig.23.6).
The aps must be handled carefully in order to avoid injuring the intercostal perforating vessels that supply the aps.
The lateral and medial portions of the inferior pedicle are resected, ready to be inverted on itself to create the inferior pole of the breast and xed with non­absorbable suture in the inferior part of the fascia of the pectoralis major muscle.