Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_591_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
29 Critical Analysis andtheFuture ofLiposuction forBody Contouring
https://t.me/medicina_free
treat the whole body using 60ml syringes to aspirate and inject fat. In the beginning, we used catheter tip syringes, which would often break at the tip, until we started using Toomey tip syringes, which solved this problem. I abandoned the use of the liposuction machine, and all my face and body contour work were performed using syringes (Toledo 1991a).
From 1988, I had been performing liposculpture with syringes only, aspirating and injecting fat, and it was in 1990 when Carson Lewis, one of the founding mem­bers of LSNA (Lipoplasty Society of North America), and Frederick Grazer, who organized courses for ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgery), saw my lectures in a small meeting in Beverly Hills (Toledo 1990b) and invited me to give courses on the technique. Carson organized live surgery workshops in his La Jolla Clinic (Toledo 1991b) and Fred in his Newport Beach facility. These meetings were attended by plastic surgeons from all over the United States, and I started being called to organize body and facial contour teaching courses at the three important societies of plastic surgery, the ASPS (Toledo 1990c) (American Society of Plastic Surgery), ASAPS (Toledo 1990d) (American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery), and LSNA (Lipoplasty Society of North America) (Toledo 1990e), which I did for over 15 years. LSNA organized two events every year back to back with the ASPS and ASAPS yearly congresses, with the sole purpose of teaching lipoplasty. LSNA ended up being absorbed by ASAPS.
Surgeons knew that it was perfectly possible to perform a full-body liposculpture using only syringes and a few cannulas. Soon I realized that the medical instru­ments’ market was not pleased with this breakthrough. The industry needed to sell expensive machines. More and more companies were starting to sell aspirators with different names. Plastic surgeons were designing different cannulas and had their names connected to the technique.
When I moved to Dubai in 2005, my nurses were not used to my work with the syringe where they have to be extra attentive and busy changing syringes and can­nulas and preparing fat for reinjection. I limited the use of syringes to small proce­dures and when fat injection was necessary.
443
Supercial Liposculpture
In 1989, I invited the Italian surgeon Marco Gasparotti to come to Brazil and lecture at the symposium I organized called RAPS, Recent Advances in Plastic Surgery (Gasparotti 1989). I had heard his technique was slightly different but had not yet seen him operate. For the sake of the program and the annals of the meeting, we decided to call Gasparotti’s technique radical liposuction. Seeing him operate, I realized he was performing supercial liposuction. After the meeting, we estab­lished a long-term collaboration, he visited me a few times in São Paulo, and I
444
https://t.me/medicina_free
would travel to Rome to see him operate. I combined his technique with syringe liposuction and started performing supercial syringe liposculpture (Toledo 1992c), aspirating and injecting fat. Illouz had just published his book Body Sculpturing by Lipoplasty (Illouz and DeVillers 1989), in which he was adamant that every liposuc­tion should be deep, leaving at least a 1cm layer of fat attached to the skin. He had published a body map, dividing the body into ve areas, easy to treat, moderate, difcult, very difcult, and taboo, areas that should not be treated at all. This map is still a very good guide to young surgeons, starting with the procedure.
Working with Marco, we realized that it was possible to increase skin retraction by aspirating fat subdermally, very close to the skin. But it was important to aspirate in a uniform mode, to avoid irregularities and produce a good skin retraction. Together, Carson Lewis, Marco, and I published in 1993 with Springer-Verlag the book Supercial Liposculpture – Manual of Technique (Toledo etal. 1993), to lay the ground work and explain how we performed the technique. After the book was published, we were invited to do live courses in North America and Europe. Many surgeons heard about the idea and started performing supercial liposuction without the necessary training, and obviously many irregularities were created.
L. S. Toledo
Power-Assisted Liposuction (PAL)
Liposuction can be a very strenuous operation. The in and out movements repeated for a few hours can be tiring and often even worse when treating secondary cases with brosis. The aspiration can be difcult at times and require special cannulas and instruments. Power-assisted liposuction (PAL) was developed to ease the move­ments of fat aspiration. The rst machines used compressed air and would shake too much, eliminating any possibility of renement. In 2015, I bought the German Moller Vibrasat (Fig.29.6), the last generation of electric vibrating machines, which abolished the handpiece vibration (Fig.29.7). Aspiration became easier and noise­less, which is very helpful in long procedures. It also has an integrated heating system for the local anesthesia, a pump for the anesthesia injection, a suction device, and a vibrating handpiece.
29 Critical Analysis andtheFuture ofLiposuction forBody Contouring
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 29.6 The Moller Vibrasat PAL machine. It heats and inltrates anesthesia and aspirates fat with vibration
445
Fig. 29.7 The Moller Vibrasat handpiece is steady and allows for a rened liposuction
446
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. S. Toledo
Internal Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction (UAL)
In 1992, the rst-generation internal ultrasound machines appeared in the market. The goal was to provoke an internal dermal “burning” and increase skin retraction. A Brazilian plastic surgeon from São José do Rio Preto came to my clinic to show me the ultrasound machine he had developed. He oversaw the procedure taking place, explaining that the ultrasound probe had to be constantly moved with in and out movements, never stopping in the same place to avoid burns and necrosis. The voluntary patient was a young girl with only a small lateral thigh adiposity, chosen to be the “perfect candidate” to demonstrate the technique. After the probe had been passed and the fat had “melted,” I used the syringe to remove the excess fat. The patient went home but called me in the middle of the night saying her right thigh was much bigger than the left. I rushed her to the hospital where I aspirated about 500ml from a hematoma. This was a hematoma from the lateral thigh, an area with­out any major vessels. I compressed the area, and the result nally and thankfully was not bad, but I immediately stopped using the device.
Ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) had been shown by Klohen (Kloehn
1996) and popularized by Zocchi (Zocchi 1999). On my next trip to the United
States, I realized ultrasound liposuction was now a big commercial hit with the launching of the second-generation Lysonix machine (Fig.29.8). In order to be licensed to perform this technique, surgeons had to undergo a training course. The machine cost about US $40,000, and the company organized courses all over the country charging doctors US $2500 to get the needed certication. It was a money­making machine. This wave lasted for about 1 year. When reports of complications (Illouz 2014) started being published and shown in meetings, doctors stopped using the technique and tried to sell their machines. An Ultrasound-Assisted Lipoplasty Task Force was created (Fredericks 1999) to report on the safety and efcacy of this new lipoplasty procedure, which was soon abandoned.
Fig. 29.8 The internal ultrasound was abandoned when reports of tissue burns and irregularities were published
29 Critical Analysis andtheFuture ofLiposuction forBody Contouring
https://t.me/medicina_free
447
The third-generation machine called Vibration Amplication of Sound Energy at Resonance (VASER) limited the power of the ultrasound energy and is less harmful to blood vessels, lymphatics, and nerves, but we still see irregularities, seromas, neural pain, and tissue burns. I have not seen the need to use these machines, but there is a media frenzy now, and doctors who do not use them are not considered up to date by prospective patients.
External Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction (XUAL)
In 1997, I learned that we could use an external ultrasound device developed by Silberg (Silberg 1998) and the Wells Johnson Company to treat adiposities (Fig.29.9). The idea was that the fat layer could be reduced just with the use of the external ultrasound with no need to perform an invasive treatment. I bought the machine and started using it in Brazil and quickly determined that results were bet­ter and more reliable if, after using the ultrasound, I aspirated the excess fat. I soon realized I was using the machine to justify the money I had spent and to be part of the “modern trend.” The question was if the skin retraction was better with the use of the machine or not.
Fig. 29.9 The external ultrasound (XUAL) was used for a while, but also abandoned
448
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. S. Toledo
Laser Liposuction
Internal laser was rst used for lipoplasty in 1990 by Thomas Dressel from the United States. He used a Nd-YAG laser, with a glass ber inside the cannula. The indications were for brotic and dense areas and for vascularized tissues. The cost of the equipment was too high, and the laser increased the complexity of the proce­dure. Results were the same as traditional lipoplasty. The method was abandoned.
In 2007, our hospital bought a Smartlipo laser machine (Fig.29.10), and we used it for a few years. The main indication for me was when a patient asked if I was performing “laser lipo” and I could say that I was. I would use the machine and obtain the same results (Fig.29.11).
Fig. 29.10 I used the Smartlipo internal laser in areas that needed more skin retraction, but the result was similar to supercial liposuction
Fig. 29.11 The use of internal laser before aspiration of the neck
29 Critical Analysis andtheFuture ofLiposuction forBody Contouring
https://t.me/medicina_free
449
External Laser
I travelled a lot to many South American countries to lecture. In 2000, while in Cali, I met the Colombian plastic surgeon Rodrigo Neira, who was using an external laser to treat the fat before aspiration. Low-intensity laser therapy was normally used for postoperative and wound treatment at a potency of 50 mw at 660nm. Neira had used it in 700 patients over 2 years to improve his liposuction results. I was organiz­ing a meeting in Porto Alegre with Nelson Heller and invited him. He came, lec­tured, and performed demonstration surgeries (Toledo and Heller 2001).
I used the laser (Fig.29.12), and in 2005, we wrote an article about our use of low-level laser-assisted liposuction (Neira etal. 2006). Neira claimed the 4L tech­nique was an excellent adjuvant tool for the surgeon practicing liposculpture. His idea was that the low-level laser would create a transitory pore in the cell membrane of the adipocyte to move fat from inside the cell to the interstitial space outside without killing the cell. The technique had been performed successfully in invitro and human adipose tissue cultures. The theory was to decrease the surgical trauma of liposuction by protecting and preparing tissues for the surgical trauma, modulat­ing the inammatory response to prevent short- and long-term side effects of sur­gery, and improving the quality and quantity of the healing process by accelerating recovery time, modulating secondary cicatrization, and preventing postoperative neuralgias.
The indications were to facilitate suctioning, shorten surgical time, decrease the risk of infection, decrease inammation, improve skin retraction, and improve recovery. After using the external laser for a period of 6 months, I realized it did not facilitate suctioning or shortened surgical time. The laser probably decreased the risk of infection and inammation, and recovery was slightly improved. But did it improve skin retraction? I could not nd any clinical demonstration that retraction was any better.
Fig. 29.12 The external laser was also used to provoke skin retraction after liposuction
450
https://t.me/medicina_free
L. S. Toledo
J Plasma
This is another new name and new trend to try to improve skin retraction. A dispos­able device in inserted under the skin, which releases helium gas and radiofrequency (RF) to create a stream of energy. This energy generates heat to contract the skin while, at the same time, excess helium gas cools the treatment area. The idea is to contract the tissues just under the skin. Since the handpiece is expensive and dispos­able and its results are still not clear, we will have to wait for further research on the technique.
High Denition
Patients mostly wanted to get rid of excess fat, and a at abdomen was what a high percentage of them were looking for, obtained by combining abdominoplasty with liposuction. In 1984, Jorge Psillakis published his modication of the traditional abdominoplasty (Psillakis 1984), adding contour and denition comparing the abdominal shape with the music instrument lyre. This was probably the rst article written explaining an attempt to improve the anatomy accentuating the shape of the recti and obliquus muscles. His technique involved undermining the major oblique musculature to reduce the diameter of the waist and also reduce the diameter of the superior abdomen by resecting cartilage from the seventh and eighth ribs when the anterior projection was exaggerated.
In 2006, Gasparotti (Gasparotti 2006) used the term 3D in an article, and soon many other authors started using different names to describe their modications, such as high denition (HD) and even 4D (!), adding another dimension to their procedures. I had been performing supercial liposculpture and observed that my female patients only wanted denition on the linea alba (patients joked about want­ing a “Champagne groove”) and on the V shape formed by the oblique muscles (Toledo 1999) (Fig.29.13).
The rst presentation I watched about abdominal etching to create a six-pack effect was in the early 1990s by Larry Schlesinger, from Honolulu. He had many male body builder patients who wanted to accentuate the abdominal muscles, and he created the etching technique to produce a six-pack denition. There was a lot of criticism, and the consensus at the time was that this was not a technique for women, since it could masculinize the women’s body. In a later meeting, Larry showed a complication—a patient to whom he had created a six-pack had put on weight and was now overweight but still showing the six-pack design on his abdomen.
The combination of etching and high denition has become very popular recently. Some surgeons became specialists in creating “athletic” bodies, the shapes being created by areas of liposuction and fat injection creating the highs and lows, vol­umes, and depressions.
29 Critical Analysis andtheFuture ofLiposuction forBody Contouring
https://t.me/medicina_free
451
Fig. 29.13 Before and 6 months after supercial syringe liposuction of the abdomen and anks with denition of the linea alba and oblique muscles
Noninvasive Body Contour
In 2013, I started using cryolipolysis (Toledo 2015) for local reduction of fat depos­its to reshape body contours. I believe liposuction is the best, safest, and most reli­able technique to remove localized fat when performed by qualied plastic surgeons. But there are patients who do not want a surgical procedure, are afraid of anesthesia, or simply do not have the money for it. With these patients in mind, I started using the Coolplas machine (Fig. 29.14). I knew there were other more expensive machines, which used expensive disposable parts for every treatment. The dispos­able gel pads of Coolplas are cheap cotton sheets saturated in a solution that protects the skin and ensures proper thermal coupling during a procedure.
Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive procedure to remove unwanted body fat by cool­ing the fat deposits and provoking subcutaneous fat reduction through cellular apop­tosis. “Cellular apoptosis is a normal biological process whereby cells are eliminated as part of normal cell turnover. The injured cell enters an orderly, regulated process of gradual degradation and is absorbed by the body’s immune system over time, usually 2 months. This reduces the subcutaneous fat tissue without damage to the
452
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 29.14 The cryotherapy Coolplas machine. Non-surgical fat reduction
L. S. Toledo
overlying skin.” The procedure is simple and fast (45–60 min), and after the treat­ment, the patient can go back to normal activities. There is no downtime and no anesthesia, and it can be performed during a lunch break. The treatment can be repeated, if necessary, after 2 months. Cellular elimination through apoptosis is in contrast to cellular necrosis, or uncontrolled cell death, in which an acute injury to the cell leads to lysis of the cell. Cellular necrosis triggers an aggressive inamma­tory response leading to brotic scar tissue formation, which is not observed with cellular apoptosis.
I had two machines in the ofce, and they worked very well. Patients were happy with the reduction of the fat deposits without having to undergo surgery. The reduc­tion is uniform. It is not possible to “sculpt” the area to be treated as we can do with liposculpture. But these patients do not mind as they wanted a bulge reduction, and the Coolplas could achieve that in the majority of the cases. There are obviously more expensive machines, but this is a cost-effective treatment that has been well accepted by my patients (Fig.29.15).