Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_574_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Part I: Introduction
- •Part II: Basic Techniques
- •Part III: Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Phalanges and Metacarpals
- •Part IV: Minimally Invasive Procedures of the Carpus
- •Part V: Minimally Invasive Procedures for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation
- •Part VI(A): Wrist and Hand Arthroscopy – Traumatic
- •Part VI(B): Wrist and Hand Arthroscopy – Reconstruction
- •Part VII: Nerve Compression
- •Part VIII: Tendons and Soft Tissues
- •Index

the position the joint assumes with joint swelling. Full flexion of
the joint will be limited by the edematous dorsal skin and soft
tissues(9).Ifthe PIP jointremains in amoderatelyflexed
position,fibrosis,and shorteningofthe intracapsular and
extracapsular structures may occur,leading to afixed contractureofthe PIP joint. Pathologic tissues involved in contracture
include exostosis, malunion, adhesions, and Watson’s checkrein
ligaments—a thickening of Eaton’s previously described
check ligaments.
Secondary to the cam effect of the metacarpal–phalangeal
joint, where the intracapsular volume is maximal in extension
and the capsular ligaments are lax, the accumulation of fluid in
the MCP joint forces the MCP joint into extension (9).
There are avariety of etiologies that result in soft tissue
contracturesand joint stiffness. Many authors have written on
the importance of the various pathological structures, from
thecheckrein ligaments to thecollateral ligaments (1–
3,8–11,13–19). Acareful physical exam andknowledge of
thepre-existingconditioncan help distinguish between
malunions or capsulo-ligamentous contractures or tendinous
adhesions or muscle weakness/contractures or skin/fascial
contractures. Clinically,itcan be difficult to identify which
structures are predominately responsible for ajoint contracture. Therefore, previously described surgical releases have
emphasizedastepwise release, whichvaryfromauthor
to author.
&
Current Treatment Options
The current standard of carefor flexion contractures is still
preventive andnon-operative management.Preventionis
based on the principle of early joint motion within the safe arc
of motion. Injuries requiringsurgicalrepair shouldbe
performed as soon as soft tissues allow in order to achieve the
earliest return of joint motion.
Once aflexion contracturehas occurred, the first modality
should always be nonsurgical. Avariety of techniques have
been described: serial casting, dynamic, and/or static splinting.
The decision to abandonconservative treatmenthas no
definitive time line. The literaturedoes not give any specifics
as to when to proceedwithsurgicalrelease.Mosthand
surgeons would consider surgical options after afailure to
progress with three months of therapy and arange of motion
of less than 458 .
Shinand Amadio suggest surgical releaseisindicated
when residual joint motion is functionally disabling, there is
normal to near normal joint articular surface and congruence,
the joint motors are intact, and all nonoperative modalities have
been correctly applied and exhausted (9). “Surgical release of
the severely contracted PIP joint yields unpredictable results
and should be considered only when both surgeon and patient
understand its limitations” (9).
Avariety of external fixators have been developed and
applied to PIP flexion contractures. External fixators have the
advantageoftransmitting theextensionforce through the
bone, as opposed to through the skin in splinting or casting.
The few small case series in the literature have shown initial
favorable results. However,they tend to have ahigh long-term
recurrence of contracture and high rate of pin site infections
(1,3,10).
Curtis made some of the first descriptions of the technique
for acapsulectomy (8). He described this through avolar Bruner
incision.In1999, Bruser and colleagues retrospectively
reviewed the results of 45 fingers comparing apalmar incision
to amidlateralincisionfor capsulectomy.Theyfoundthe
improvementinrange of motion of themidlateralincision
group was statistically significantly better than in the volar
incision group (14).
There have been many reports on the open release of PIP
joint contractureswith varying results (2,8,10,11,13–18). Curtis
reported that the greater the number of anatomic structures
involved in the limitation of motion, the worse the postoperative range of motion (8). Ghidella et al. perf ormed a
retrospective review of 68 PIP joints released as previously
describedbyCurtis (8), whichidentified preoperative and
intraoperative factorsthat were associatedwith worse
outcomes. Accordingtotheir study,the ideal surgical candidate
for correction of acontracted PIP joint has an exostosis (which
can be removed), asimple diagnosis, is younger than 28 years,
and has apreoperative maximum flexion measurement of ! 438
(2). In arecentliterature review of thetreatmentofposttraumatic PIP flexion contractures, Hogan and Nunley found
that after openrelease fin gerextension most commonly
improves approximately 258 to 308 but is often accompanied
by aloss of finger flexion (10). Overall, there has been anet
improvement in motion, but some patients even lost motion
after open release (2,10).
&
Cadaveric Studies
Five fresh frozen hands were thawed and the index, long,
ring,and little wereexaminedusing imag ingtoensure
congruent gliding and to rule-outbonydeformity. The
dorsal joint capsule of the MCP and PIP joints was located
using fluoroscopy.A19-gauge needle was placed laterally into
the dorsal joints under the capsule and perpendicular to the
digit. A15-blade scalpel was used to incise the skin longitudinally and asmall curved hemostat was used to bluntly
dissect the soft tissue and punch into the dorsal joint through
the capsule. Imaging was used to confirm the position of the
hemostat in the dorsal joint. The hemostat was then pivoted at
the joint entrance sweeping the tips proximally over the dorsal
head,rupturing theproximal dorsal capsuleattachment.
Sweeping more proximal the extensor tendon was elevated
offthe proximal phalanx. Having completed the percutaneous
release, tractionwas placed on theext ensor,flexor,and
intrinsictendons,which werepreviouslyidentified and
tagged. Each of the digits demonstrated normal congruent
jointglidingthroughacomple te flexion and extension
arc, withtip to palmand full extension without extensor
lag.Lastly,eachofthe digits wasdissected by making a
longitudinal incision andthe dorsal jointportal site was
identified.The dorsal proximalcapsulewas completely
divided. No extensor or joint injury was identified.
&
INDICATIONS
Once aflexioncontracture hasoccurred, thepatientsare
enrolledinahand rehabilitationprogram before surgery
until progress in therapy has reached aplateau, usually not
before three months.Patientsselectedfor surgicalrelease
complainedofjoint stiffnessimpairing hand function,
possessed anormal congruent articular jointsurface,and
had normal motor function. Extensive previous surgery with
altered anatomic landmarks maybeacontraindication
to surgery.
84&Slade and Gillon

FIGURE 2 Fluoroscopic image of 15-blade anteriolateral
stab wound into dorsal skin.
(A) (B)
(D)(C)
FIGURE 1 Percutaneous release of PIP extension contracture. ( A )Lateral fluoroscopy of previously injured PIP
now with extension contracture. ( B )Fluoroscopically guided placement of 19-gauge needle into dorsal aspect of
PIP joint. ( C )Lateral view of anteriolateral placement of 19-gauge needle. ( D )APview of anteriolaterally placed
needle. Abbreviation:PIP, proximal interphalangeal.
Percutaneous Release of the Post-traumatic Finger Joint Contracture
&
85

&
PERCUTANEOUS SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
The procedure can be performed under local, regional, or
general anesthesia. Atourniquet is placed on the patient’s
arm and inflated after the finger,hand, and forearm have
been exsanguinated. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a19-gauge
needle is placed into the PIP or MCP joint from an anteriolateral direction at the joint line, volar to the joint capsule
and extensor mechanism (proximal to the central slip of PIP
joint) anddorsaltothe collateralligaments (Fig.1A–D).
Ascalpel is used to incise the skin only (Fig. 2). The needle
is removed and asmall hemostat snap is inserted and the
skin is bluntly dissected to the dorsal joint capsule and with
direct pressurethe joint capsule is penetrated under fluoroscopic guidance (Fig. 3A,B). Using live fluoroscopy,the small
curved hemostat position is confirmed in the dorsal joint
under the capsule and extensor tendon (Fig. 3B). The hemostat is swept proximally rupturing the dorsal capsule and
elevating theextensortendoncapsule andbreakingany
adhesions from the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx
or metacarpal head. The hemostat is then swept laterally
between the collateral ligaments and the head of the proximal
phalanx or metacarpal, breaking up any additional adhesions.
With flexion contractures, the hemostat can be swept volarly
and used to break adhesions between the distal attachment
of thevolar plateand thebaseofthe middlephalanx,
as wellasthe proximal attachmentsofthe volarplate
and checkreins to the volar head of the proximal phalanx.
Care must be taken to glide the hemostat volarly close to
bone avoiding theneurovascular structures.Withsevere
scarring of the soft tissue, this maneuver is contraindicated
becauseofthe potential for injury to theneurovascular
structures.
Thejoint is then passivelyflexed andextendedunder
imagingtodetermine theintraoperativegaininthe arc of
motion and to confirm congruent gliding (Figs. 4A,B and 6).
This percutaneous joint release can also be performed on the
distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) joint in asimilar fashion since
theDIP has similar anatomical structures to thePIP joint
(Fig. 5A–C).
Figures1–6 show percutaneous release of both the PIP and
DIP in a25-year-old male who had previously undergone a
radioulnar ligamentous reconstructionwith bone anchors
after adislocation injury.Hesubsequently developed an extension contracture at his index finger and failed conservative
management.
(A)
(B)
FIGURE3 Percutaneous dorsalcapsularreleasewith hemostat.
( A )Intraoperative view of small curved hemostatplaced percutaneously
into dorsal PIP joint. ( B )Intraoperative lateral fluoroscopic view of small
curved hemostat placed percutaneously into dorsal PIP joint to release
dorsal capsular and extensor tendon adhesions.
(A)
(B)
FIGURE 4 ( A )Intraoperative view showing regain of full flexion at PIP
joint after percutaneousrelease. ( B )Intraoperative lateral fluoroscopic
view showing regain of 858 of flexion at PIP joint after percutaneous
release.
86
&
Slade and Gillon

If extracapsular structures,i.e., tendonadhesions,are
suspected to be an additional etiology of the contracture, they
can be addressed at this time. Asingle 5-0 nylon interrupted
sutureisused to close the PIP joint wound. The finger is placed
in alight dressingand splinted into the corrected position.
Postoperatively,the patient is started on an immediate
rehabilitation program to maintain the motion gained intraoperatively. Therapywillemploydigital wraps to control
swellingand selective blocks areusedtocontrol pain.
Narcoticsand NSAIDs areemployedpostoperatively,
the former to control pain and the latter to reduce inflammation.Prior to surgery,arrangementfor postopera tive
rehabilitation with askilled hand therapist is essential, as
well as patient knowledge of and compliance with the postoperative program.
&
RESULTS
Between 2003 and 2006, 60 patients weretreated with percutaneous release of the MCP and PIP joints. Patients werestarted
on an immediate hand therapyprogram postoperatively.
The best results were observedinthe young with asingle
pathological diagnosis. Those with crush injuries and scarring
of multiple structures did the poorest and required multiple
procedures. No complications were recorded including neurovascular injury,tendon disruption, or joint arthrosis.
&
SUMMARY
In 1977, Harrison suggested that “adhesions between the collateral ligaments and the sides of the phalangeal head are amore
important cause of stiffness than shortening of the collateral
ligament itself” (18). Since then many papers have been written
on the stiffPIP joint and implicated various pathoanatomical
etiologies, most of which pertain to either the collateral ligaments
or the checkrein ligaments (2,8,11,13–19). Stanley et al. described
aseriesofpercutaneous releases of theaccessorycollateral
ligament of the PIP joint (19 ). While their case number was
small and follow-up limited, they reportedamean correction
of 64%ofthe originalcontracture—si milartothe results of
many open releasecasestudies (19).Theyrecognizedthat
their procedurealsohad thebenefitofdividingadhesions
between the collateral ligament and the phalangeal head.
We believe that intracapsular adhesions and fibrosis play a
largerole in the post-traumatic MCP and PIP contracture, which
is evident by the significant increase in motion postoperatively
in our series. While this procedure does not address all the
pathological components of aflexion contracture, the motion
gained and the minimalinvasiveness of thepro cedure
substantiate its use prior to subjecting the finger to the more
invasive open procedures.
This technique has certain advantages over both open and
external fixationprocedures.Inthe describedpercutaneous
release, allofthe soft tissuestabilizersofthe jointremain
intact,thus, avoiding thepotentialofjoint instability.
The procedurecan be performed in amatter of minutes, enabling
multiple fingers to be addressed at once and it can be used as an
adjunct to other procedures such as tenolysis or fasciectomy.The
healingtime is quicker than an open procedure, allowing a
theoretical improved patient compliance with the postoperative
rehabilitation. As opposed to externalfixators,which have
approximately a40% infection rate (3), we had no incidence of
postoperative infection. Patients also do not have to worry about
pin loosening, external fixator care, or the prominence of the
fixator, whichcan be cumbersomewith certain activities
especially if dealing with multiple or non-border digits.
(A)
(B)
(C)
FIGURE 5 Percutaneous release of DIP joint extension contracture by
same methoddescribed forPIP joint. ( A )Fluoroscopically guided
placementof19-gauge needle into dorsal aspect of DIPjoint.
( B )Lateral view of anteriolateral placement of 19-gauge needle into
DIP. ( C )Percutaneous placement of small curved hemostat into dorsal
DIP capsule.
Percutaneous Release of the Post-traumatic Finger Joint Contracture
&
87

&
SUMMATION POINTS
Indications
&
Soft-tissue contractures of MP,PIP,and DIP joints
&
Normal articular anatomy
&
Joints that fail conservative treatment including therapy
and splinting
Outcomes
&
Excellent range of motion with less soft-tissue scarring
&
Low complication rate
&
Short surgical time allowing multiple digits to be treated
Complications
&
Failure to achieve adequate release
&
Tendon injury (theoretical)
&
REFERENCES
1. SegalmanK.Surgical management of the stiffPIP joint. In:
Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society
for Surgery of the Hand. Wa shington, DC: Omnipress, 2006.
2. Ghidella SD, Segalman KA, Murphey MS. Long-term resultsof
surgical management of proximal interphalangealjoint contracture.JHand Surg [Am] 2002; 27(5):799–805.
3. Houshian S, Gynning B, Schroder HA. Chronic flexion contracture
of proximal interphalangeal joint treated with the compass hinge
external fixator.Aconsecutive series of 27 cases. JHand Surg [Br]
2002; 27(4):356–8.
4. Gutow AP,Slade JFI, MahoneyJD. Phalangeal injuries. In:
Thomas E, Trumble MD, eds. Hand Surgery Update 3. Rosemont,
IL: American Society for Surgery of the Hand, 2003:3–28 (chap. 1).
5. Slade JFI, Choi J, Panjabi M, Wolfe S. The influenceofjoint position
on fracturetype and soft tissue injuries of proximal interphalangeal joint injuries.Orthop Tr ans 1997; 21(1):349.
6. Slade JFI, Choi J, Wo lfe S. Acadaveric model of the unstable
fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangealjoint. Orthop
Trans 1997; 21(1):120.
7. Slade JI, Baxamusa T, Wolfe S. External fixation of proximal
interphalangeal joint fracturedislocations. In: Raskin KB, ed.
Atlas of the Hand Clinics, March 2000, (5)1:1–29.
8. Curtis RM. Capsulectomy of the interphalangeal joints of the
fingers. JBone Joint Surg 1954; 36-A(6):1219–32.
9. Shin A, Amadio P. Stifffinger joints. In: Green P, HotchkissWolfe,
eds. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery.Philadelphia,PA: Elsevier,
2005:417–38 (chap. 11).
10. Hogan CJ, Nunley JA. Posttraumatic proximal interphalangeal joint
flexion contractures. JAmAcad Orthop Surg 2006; 14(9):524–33.
11.Watson HK, Light TR,Johnson TR .Checkrein resection for
flexion contractureofthe middle joint. JHand Surg [Am] 1979;
4(1):67–71.
12. Hume MC, Gellman H, McKellop H, Brumfield RH, Jr.Functional
range of motion of the joints of the hand. JHand Surg [Am] 1990;
15(2):240–3.
13. Abbiati G, Delaria G, Saporiti E, Petrolati M, Tr emolada C. The
treatment of chronic flexion contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. JHand Surg [Br] 1995; 20(3):385–9.
14. Bruser P, Poss T, Larkin G. Results of proximal interphalangeal
joint release for flexion contractures: midlateral versus palmar
incision. JHand Surg [Am] 1999; 24(2):288–94.
15. Curtis RM. Management of the stiffproximal interphalangeal joint.
Hand 1969; 1:32–7.
16. Diao E, Eaton RG. Total collateral ligament excision for contracturesofthe proximal interphalangeal joint. JHand Surg[Am] 1993;
18(3):395–402.
17. Gould JS, Nicholson BG. Capsulectomyofthe metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. JHand Surg [Am] 1979;
4(5):482–6.
18. Harrison DH. The stiffproximal interphalangeal joint. Hand 1977;
9(2):102–8.
19. Stanley JK, Jones WA ,Lynch MC. Percutaneous accessory
collateral ligament release in the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture. JHand Surg [Br] 1986;
11(3):360–3.
FIGURE 6 Intraoperative fluoroscopy and photo showing 908
of flexion at the PIP and 608 at the DIP joints with flexor tendon
tensioning after percutaneous release of both joints.
88
&
Slade and Gillon

Part IV:Minimally Invasive Procedures of the Carpus
12
Percutaneous Scaphoid Fixation via aDorsal Technique
Joseph F. Slade III
Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of
Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Greg Merrell
Department of Orthopedics, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.
&
INDICATIONS
This technique is appropriate for any acute scaphoid fracture in
thewaistorproximal pole. Many angular or translational
displacements canbecorrected andrigidly fixed percutaneously. Fracturesofthe distal pole may be more
appropriately treated conservatively or with volar fixation to
maximize screwpurchaseinthe distal fragment. We recommend starting with nondisplaced fracturestoestablish the
skill set needed for moredifficult displaced fractures.
&
CHOICE AND POSITION OF IMPLANT
An increasing variety of compression screws are available for
fixation of scaphoid fractures. Toby found resistance to cyclic
loading was proportional to the radius of the screw to the fourth
power ( r
4
)(1).Further,hefoundthe cannulatedAcutrak
(Acumed, Beaverton, Oregon, U.S.A.) screw was the strongest
headless compression screw, giving thehighest number of
cycles to failure. The Herbert-Whipple(Zimmer, Wa rsaw,
Indiana, U.S.A.), and AO (Synthes Corp., We st Chester,Pennsylvania,U.S.A.) lagscrewsfailedcatastrophicallywith a
resulting “windshield wiper” effect under conditions of volar
comminution. The Acutrak screw underwent gradual separation via plastic deformation rather than catastrophic failure.
Trumble described the clinical importance of central axis screw
placement (2).
&
TECHNIQUE
&
ASimple New Targeting Guide
We now use an external cross Kirschner (K) wire targeting
guide. This simple technique permits external sighting of the
central axis by percutaneously placed perpendicular K-wires.
This system also decreases radiation exposure as imaging is
used primarily to set up the initial targeting system. This guide
requires the placement of two K-wires in the distal scaphoid in
the same axial plane, one perpendicular to the scaphoid, and
one offset in a90 8 arc. First awireisdriven dorsal to volar in the
Posteroanterior (PA) plane of the distal scaphoid while ulnar
deviating the wrist to extend the scaphoid (Fig. 1). Asecond
wireisplaced in the lateral scaphoid-radial to ulnar (Fig. 2).
These wires cross at the distal scaphoid central axis and form a
crosshair target for guidewire placement (Fig. 3). With the wrist
extended and ulna deviated, PA imaging of the dorsal scaphoid
wire if correctly perpendicular to the bone axis will appear as a
single dark point. The lateral radial wire is introduced also
perpendicular to the distal scaphoid and driven toward and
across the dorsal wire as it appears on image as asingle point.
Alateral fluoroscopic image will confirm that the lateral wire
has been placed in the mid axis of the distal scaphoid.
&
Technique for Displaced Fractures
After the “external cross K-wire scaphoid guide” is in place,
aPAimage is obtained andthe fracture site is identified.
Since the distal scaphoid fracture fragment is usually flexed
exposing thedorsalintramedullarycanal of thescaphoid,
aK-wire can be introduced into the fracture site and driven
through the distal scaphoid intramedullary canal. The “external
cross K-wire scaphoid guide” provides direction as the wire is
driven from dorsal to volar.The proximal fragment at this time
is irrelevant, and will later be reduced. The wire is withdrawn
volarly until the trailing edge of the wire is at the fracture site.
Now a0.062 K-wire joystick is placed in the proximal fragment,
dorsal to volar.The wrist is placed in aneutral position and
imaged, as the two dorsal joysticks (one in the distal fragment
and one in the proximal scaphoid fragment) are manipulated
until fracture alignment is obtained (Fig. 4). The lateral view of
the concave scaphoid surface serves as the key reference for
fracture reduction. Fracturereduction is secured by driving the
volar wireretrograde across the fracture site.
Note if adorsal intercalated segment instability deformity is
present due to the extreme scaphoid flexion at the fracture site,
fracture reduction can be achieved by hyper flexion of the wrist
until the lunate is in aneutral position and awire is driven
through the distal radius into the lunate securing it provisionally
in aneutral position. Or the wire can be placed dorsal directly
into the lunate in aneutral position. As long as an intact
scapholunate interosseous (SLIO) ligament exist the reduction
force is transferred from the lunate to the scaphoid (Fig. 5).
&
Technique for Nondisplaced Fractures
Once reductionand provisional fixation of thedisplaced
fracture has occurred or in the case of anondisplaced fracture
proceed as follows. With the wrist partially flexed aminifluoroscopic unit is used to locate the tip of the proximal
scaphoid pole, the starting point for the central axis scaphoid
guidewire.Drive the central axis wire towardthe thumb base,

correcting its directionwith the use of the external K-wire
targeting guides (the dorsal wire providesradial–ulnar
guidance and the lateral K-wire provides dorsal–volar orientation). Acorrectly placed central axis scaphoid wire will hit
the crossing wires in the distal scaphoid, the location of the
central axis. The wire is driven volarly past this intersection,
through the trapezium, and exits at the thumb base in asafe
zone without neurovascular structures.The wire is advanced
volarly until the trailing edge crosses the radiocarpal joint and
the wrist can be safely extended. In the case of adisplaced
FIGURE 1 First 0.06200targeting wire placed dorsal to volar in the distal scaphoid with the wrist in ulnar deviation to extend the scaphoid.
FIGURE 2 Second 0.06200targeting wire placed radial to ulnar in the mid-lateral position of the distal scaphoid.
90
&
Slade and Merrell

fracture thereare nowtwo wires down thelengthofthe
scaphoid, one was used to capture the initial reduction and
the second placed down the long axis (Fig. 6). The wire used to
capturethe reduction also acts as an anti-rotation construct
during scaphoid reaming and screw placement. For nondisplaced fracturesasecond wire is rarely needed.Imaging
confirms the position of the wireand the scaphoid fracture
reduction. If satisfactory,the next step is an arthroscopic
inspection of the joint.
&
ARTHROSCOPY
The goal of arthroscopy is to identify and treat ligament injuries,
and directly inspect the quality of the reduction. The elbow is
flexed and the wrist is positioned upright in aspring-scale
driven traction tower.Twelve pounds of traction is distributed
between four finger traps to reduce the possibility of atraction
injury.Ifthe finger traps slip off, apply mastisol or steristrips
circumferentially at the baseofthe finger trap. The arm is
exsanguinated. Afluoroscopy unit is placed horizontal to the
floor and perpendicular to the wrist as the radiocarpal and
midcarpal joint are identified with imaging. 19-gauge needles
are introduced into the wrist joint identifying the radiocarpal
and midcarpal portals. This maneuver minimizes iatrogenic
injury to the joint.
The skin is incisedand ablunt hemostat is used to
separate thesofttissueand enterthe wristjoint.Ablunt
trocar is placed at the radial midcarpal portal and asmall
jointangledarthroscopeisinserted. A19-gaugeneedleis
inserted to establish outflow.Aprobe is introduced at the
FIGURE 3 Pronated,ulnarly deviatedview of the central axis with the targeting system guide wires in place.
FIGURE 4 Displaced scaphoid fracture with 0.06200joysticks in place prior to reduction, fluoroscopic image of
fracture reduction using joysticks, capturing the reduction with the central axis wire.
Percutaneous Scaphoid Fixation via aDorsal Technique
&
91

ulnar midcarpalportaland subsequentlyatthethird and
fourth portal to assess the competency of the carpal ligaments
by directly stressing their attachments to detect partial and
complete tears.
First identify the scapholunate ligament sulcus. Injuries to
the scapholunateligamentdetectedare gradedusingthe
Geissler grading system (3). Grade IandII ligament injuries
are debrided. Grade III injuries are debrided and pinned for
six weeks. Grade IV ligament injuries require openrepair of
the dorsal SLIO ligament with bone anchors and carpal pinning.
The need for the addition of adorsalcapsulodesis tether is
determined by the quality of the acute repair after scaphoid
fixation. Tea r s ofthetriangular fibrocartilage complexare
classified usingthe Palmerclassificationandtreated accordingly (4).
&
SCAPHOID LENGTH
The screw length should be 4 mm less than the scaphoid length.
This permits 2mm ofclearanceat each end of the scaphoid,
thus minimizing the risk of prominent hardware. The most
common complication ofpercutaneousscaphoid fixation,is
implantation of ascrewwhich is too long (5).
&
FIXATION
Remove the extremity from the arthroscopy traction tower, flex
the wrist and advance the wire retrograde until it is equally
exposed on both ends. This prevents the wire from becoming
dislodged during reaming. It is crucial that the wrist maintains
aflexedposition topreventthe wire from bending. Dorsal
placement is recommended for fractures of the proximal pole
FIGURE 5 Wire to control dorsal intercalated segment instability deformityof the lunate.
A
D
C
B
FIGURE 6 ( A )Wiretocontrollunateposition,(B )percutaneoussnapto
assist with reduction, (C )wireusedtocapturereductionandnowserves
as derotation wire, and ( D )centralaxis wire.
92
&
Slade and Merrell

and volar implantation is used for distal pole fractures. Fractures of the waist may be fixed from either adorsal or volar
approach. Vo lar implantation often requires reaming through
part of thetrapezium, sincethisisthe central axis.Blunt
dissection along the guide wire exposes atract to the dorsal
wrist capsule and the scaphoid base.
The scaphoid is reamed 2mmshort of opposite cortex
with acannulated hand drill. Newer self-drilling screws have
reduced the needfor extensive reaming, butthe scaphoid
shouldstillbereamedpastthe fracture site to prevent
gapping. It is critical to use fluoroscopy to check the position
and depth during reaming.The scaphoid should never be
reamedtothe opposite bone cortex (over-drilling). This
reducesfracturecompression and increases theriskof
motion at thefracturesite.AstandardAcutrak screw is
advanced underfluoroscopic guidance down thecentral
scaphoid axis to within 1to2mm of the opposite cortex. If
the screw is advanced to the distal cortex, attempts to advance
the screw further will force the fracture fragments to gap
and separate.
With unstable or displaced fractures, acounter force is
applied with the dorsal K-wire holding pressure against the
proximal fragment to prevent gapping. Unstable fractures may
not achieve rigid fixation with screw implantation alone. Other
temporaryfixationmay be required,toachieve arigid
construct, until healinghas occurred. Thedistalscaphoid
pole acts as along lever arm to the proximal scaphoid pole
and proximal carpal row during wrist motion. Proximal pole
fractureshave only afew threads crossing the fracture line.
Wrist motion results in continuous rocking at the fracturesite.
The forces concentrated here are significant and can result in
reductionofcompression andloosening of fixation. These
forces canbebalanced by theplacementofa0.062inch
K-wire or headless compressionscrew from thescaphoid
into thecapitate(Fig. 7).These instrumentstemporarily
blocksmidcarpalmotionand reduce forces acting on the
scaphoid fracture site. Another mechanical block is a0.062 inch
K-wire placed between the II or III web-space into the capitate
and the lunate. After healing has been confirmed with computed
tomography (CT) scan,these mechanical blocks are
removed percutaneously.
Severe comminution may make rigid fixation impossible.
In thesecases,align the scaphoid fracturefragments with
multiple K-wiresdownthe central axis,and stabilize the
capitolunate jointwith K-wires. After,one month, these
provisional fixation wiresare removed. Dorsal percutaneous
bone grafting of thescaphoidand rigidfixationofthe
scaphoid with aheadlesscompression screwcan then
be accomplished.
FIGURE 7 Increasing fracture stability by mechanicalblock of scaphoid lever arm.
Percutaneous Scaphoid Fixation via aDorsal Technique
&
93
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
