Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_574_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
78 Мб
Скачать
22
Balloon Reduction and Grafting of Distal Radius Fractures
Jose´M. Nolla
Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Jesse B. Jupiter
Orthopedic Hand Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
&
INTRODUCTION
The concept of “cementing” fractures became areality with the development of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in the 1960s (1). Schmalholz in 1988 described the use of polymethyl­methacrylate in the management of distal radius fractures (2). This approach has been further supported by severalother investigators (3–5). By the same token, problems with poly­methylmethacrylate havelimitedits application. These difficulties include its curing with an exothermic reaction, its inability to be incorporated with the host bone, and its require­ment for wide exposureofthe fracturesite.
The advent of injectable cements like Norian SRS (Synthes Corp., We st Chester,Pennsylvania, U.S.A.) has brought again to the forefront the potential for cementing fractures through a minimallyinvasiveapproach.Norian SRSand othernew biologic cements are biocompatible and have ahigher compres­sive strength than cancellous bone (6). Norian SRS cures at a physiologic pH and temperature to form an osteoconductive carbonated apatite with properties very similar to the mineral phase of bone (3,6). Several prospective studies have demon­strated the efficacy of Norian SRS over conventional treatments such as cast, pins, and/or external fixation (3,5). One difficulty that was recognized in attempting to apply the Norian SRS percutaneously was the observation that the viscous cement did not always fill the metaphyseal defect following manipulative reduction. This proved to be theresultofcancellous bony
spicules blocking the flow of the Norian cement. As aresult, it became evident that it was necessary to compact the metaphy­seal bone to accommodatethe cement.Thistaskcan be accomplished through an open approach where tamps and elevators would be used to create ametaphyseal void.
Recently,inflatable balloons for “vertebroplasty” have been
developedfor spine surgery.Thistechniquehas also been evaluated in the management of fractures involving metaphy­seal bone suchasfractures of thecalcaneus, tibial plateau, femoral condyles, and distal radius (4). Such aballoon combines the potential of creating ametaphyseal void with its ability to assist with fracture reduction.
&
INDICATIONS
Balloon reduction and minimally invasive bone grafting tech­niques are appropriate for active osteoporotic patients with reducible unstable and/or displaceddistalradiusfractures resulting from low-energy impact.These shouldbeextra­articular (AO type A2 or A3) or simple articular fractures(AO
type C1 or C2) without extension into the diaphysis (Fig. 1). The techniqueisnot applicable to shearing fractures (Barton’s), volardisplacementfractures (Smith’s),highl ycomminuted fractures, high-energy injuries, or nascent malunions, which aremoreamenabletoopentechniques.Activeinfectio n, severe medicalillness, and patient unreliability alsoare contraindications.
&
CONSIDERATIONS FOR PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
Careful evaluation of the patient as awhole is important prior to embarking on surgery.Itisimportant to note their activity level, functional independence, reliability,and comorbid medical conditions. Prior to any intervention, it is essential to perform adetailed exam of the involved extremity.Acareful exami­nation of the skin and neurovascular status may drastically change the timing of intervention. In the presence of median nerve symptoms, which persist following provisional fracture reduction, acarpal tunnel release should be considered simul­taneously with fracturefixation. When the hand and wrist are very swollen, it is beneficial to elevate the limb afew days to allow the soft tissues to heal from the initial injury.
Standard posteroanterior,lateral, and oblique radiographs are often sufficienttodelineate the fracture pattern. Xrays obtained after longitudinal traction is applied will add further clarity to the fracture definition. Computed tomography may be needed when determining if an articular component is suf­ficiently displaced to negate balloon-assisted treatment. While examining radiographic studies, it is also important to note the carpal alignment and any distal radioulnar joint involvement.
It is our perception that balloon-assisted reduction and void creationare optimally combined with percutaneous cement infusion as opposed to the use of other bone substitutes, such as allograft or autogenous graft, which must be applied through more extensile exposures.
&
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Regional block anesthesia is preferredunlessmedical con­ditionspreclude this approach. Preoperativeantibiotics are given for prophylaxis. The patient is placed in supine position with the extremity placed on aradiolucent hand table with a pneumatic tourniquet applied. Fluoroscopy is required. Supple­mental fixation in the form of Kirschner (K) wiresoranexternal fixator should also be available. Traction fingertraps can help when extra assistance is not available.
The procedurebegins with amanipulative reduction of the fracture (Fig. 2) (8). To insert the balloon cannula, a1.5–2 cm incision is made between the first and second extensor compart­mentswithcaution to avoidinjury to theoverlyingradial sensory nerves. The incision should also be placed over the metaphyseal fracture zone. Usinga3.5 mm drill bit with a protective drill sleeve, an opening is createdfor insertion of the balloon cannula. Using fluoroscopic guidance, the verteb­roplasty cannula is centered in the metaphyseal defect with the opening directed distally (Fig. 3). Progressive inflation of the balloon with saline will accomplish two things: ( i )creation of a metaphyseal void and ( ii)fracture reduction. To maintain the reduction following balloon deflation, atemporary transfixing K-wire is placed between the distal ulna and the radius distal to the metaphyseal defect.Alternatively,anobliqueK-wire
canbepassedacrossthe fracture site throughthe radial styloid (Figs. 4and 5).
The Norian SRS is mixed by hand and injected through a separate cannula directly into the defect under fluoroscopic guidance until complete fill of the defect is observed (Figs. 6 and 7). Whenever possible, cement extravasations are to be avoided. The fracture is not to be manipulated for aminimum of 10 minutes to permit the Norian SRS to set properly.
&
Postoperative Management
Postoperatively,the patient should be placed in awell-molded splint for two weeks. The patient is then placed in aremovable splint for four weeks while motion is initiated. If an external fixator was utilized to supplement the phosphate cement, it can
A
B
C
A1
B1
C1
A2
B2
C2
A3
B3
C3
FIGURE 1 AO/ASIF classification of distal radius fractures. Source:From Ref. 7.
FIGURE 2 Fluoroscopy-assisted closed reduction.
Source:Courtesy of Dr Mark Cohen.
176
&
Nolla and Jupiter
be discontinued at two weeks, followed by aremovable splint for four weeks. From the first postoperative day,all patients should work on digital rangeofmotionand elevation to minimize edema. Occupational therapy should be started two weeksafter surgerystressing wristand fo rearmrange of motion.
&
COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT
The most common complication of using Norian SRS is the loss of fracturereduction. In aprospective study by Cassidy and colleagues, this was observed in 46 out of 161 (29%) patientsofwhich 9patients required secondarytreatment (3). In the series by Sanchez-Sotelo and colleagues, this was observed in 10 out of 55 patients treated with Norian SRS (5).
In aseriesof12patients treated by Reileywith balloon reductionand cementation, 4patients showed mild subsi­dence(4).Another potentialcomplicat ionispin site infections. These are often seen with K-wiresand external fixators. They can often be treated with local wound care and oral antibiotics. More severe cases may requirepin removal and operative debridement.
The superficial radial sensory nerve and its branches are at risk during this approach. These are best avoided by the use of protective drill sleeves and avoiding multiple penetrations of the skin in the same area with the K-wires.
Extraosseous cement can be seen in as many as 70% of patients (3). It is best avoided by meticulous application of the Norian SRS. While it dissolves in most with time, it can be associated with other complications including fracturesettling,
FIGURE 3 The fracture is reduced and the metaphyseal defect is prepared by compacting the cancellous bone with an inflatable balloon. The opening in the cannula should open distally to assist in fracture reduction.
FIGURE 4 Supplemental fixation. K-wiresare used to supplement stability in unstable fractures. Source:Courtesy of Dr Mark Cohen.
Balloon Reduction and Grafting of Distal Radius Fractures
&
177
carpal tunnel syndrome, and tendon attrition. Intra-articular cement is usually not substantial enough to cause any symp­toms,but there is onereported case of symptomatic intra­articular cement requiring surgical excision (5).
&
OUTCOMES
Whilelittle hasbeen published combining balloon-assisted reductionwithNorianSRS, otherreports utilizing with Norian SRS offer favorable results. In aprospective study of 323 patientstreatedwith closed reductionand Norian SRS cement compared to thosetreated with external fixation and/or percutaneous pinning, those treated with Norian showed an earlier return of function. However,the difference disappearedat12months (3). Similarly,inaprospective study
of 110patients randomized to treatment with closed reduction and Norian SRScement versus closedreductionalone also showed an earlierreturnoffunctioninthose treated with cement. Thedifferencenormalizedover12months. In this series, the incidence of fracture settling was significantly less in thosetreated with closed reductionand Norian cement compared to those treated with closed reduction alone (5).
&
SUMMARY
Recent improvements in bone graft substitutes are making it possible to treat distal radius fractures with less invasive and more reliable techniques.Through percutaneous methods using aballoon it is now possible to reduce the fracture and create awell-demarcated metaphyseal void. This void can then
FIGURE 5 Atemporary transfixing Kirschner wire is used to maintain the reduction after the balloon is deflated.
FIGURE 6 The phosphate cement is injected while the temporary Kirschner wire holds the reduction.
178
&
Nolla and Jupiter
be filledwith biologic cementsinorder to attainstable fracturefixation.
&
SUMMATION POINTS
Indications
&
Osteoporotic patient with extra-articular or simple intra­articular low-energyfracture.
Outcomes
&
Patients treatedwithcalcium phosphate cementcan be expected to have aquicker functional recovery.
&
Basedonavailable data,fractures supplemented with calcium phosphate cement seem to be less likely to develop settlingand/or arelesslikelytorequire surgic al intervention.
Complications
&
Observefor significantsettling, sincemalunions can become symptomatic.
&
Extraosseous cement is avoided by meticulous technique. This significantly reduces the incidence and extent. Still, a small amount is commonly observed. This dissolves with time and is rarely symptomatic.
&
Supplemental fixation techniques like external fixators and K-wires have inherent risks like neurovascularinjury upon applicationand late pinsiteinfec tions. Theseare best avoided by careful technique.
&
Digital motion loss due to adhesions should be avoided by carefulwireplacement and an earlyrangeofmotion program.
&
REFERENCES
1. Hartigan BJ, Cohen MS. Use of bone graft substitutes and bioactive
materials in treatment of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2005; 21(3):449–54.
2. Schmalholz A, Alberts KA. Ascintimetric study of Colles’ fracture.
Comparison between cementation and closed treatment. Acta Radiol 1988; 29(6):715–7.
3. Cassidy C, Jupiter JB, Cohen M, et al. Norian SRS cement compared
with conventional fixation in distal radial fractures. Arandomized study.JBone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(11):2127–37.
4. Reiley MA. Percutaneous balloon-plasty technique and results for
tibial plateau, distal radius and femoral condylar,and calcaneus fractures. In: Poster in Orthopedic Tr auma Association Meeting. Toronto, ON, October 11–13, 2002.
5. Sanchez-Sotelo J, MunueraL,Madero R. Treatment of fractures of
the distal radius with aremodellable bone cement: aprospective, randomised study using Norian SRS. JBone Joint SurgBr2000; 82(6):856–63.
6. Constantz BR, Ison IC, Fulmer MT,etal. Skeletal repair by in situ
formation of the mineral phase of bone. Science 1995; 267(5205):1796–9.
7. Jiuliano JA, Jupiter JB. Distal radius fractures. In: Trumble T,
Cornwall R, BudoffJ,eds. CoreKnowledge in Orthopedics: Hand, Elbow and Shoulder.Philadelphia,PA: C.V.Mosby,2005:87.
8. Fernandez DL. Closed manipulation and casting of distal radius
fractures. Hand Clin 2005; 21(3):307–16.
FIGURE 7 Radiographic appearance one year after surgery. Source:Courtesy of Dr Mark Cohen.
Balloon Reduction and Grafting of Distal Radius Fractures
&
179
23
Limited Approach Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures
Jose´M. Nolla
Department of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Jesse B. Jupiter
Orthopedic Hand Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
&
INTRODUCTION
Thetreat ment of distal radius fractures hasundergonea number of changes in recent years. These have been the result of better understanding of fracturepatterns, design of implants, and developments in implant technology.The comprehensive AO classification,aswellaswork by Fernandez, andthe column theory advocated by Rikli and Regazzoni and Medoff have brought light to key components in distal radius fractures (1,2).
Understanding of the key components in the structural support of the distal radius articular surface has allowed the development of implants that provide the needed support in casesofcompromised stability.The keycomponents as
describedbyRikli andRegazzoni include amedial(ulnar) column, which consists of the distal ulna, triangular fibrocarti­lage complex (TFCC), and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) (Fig. 1) (2). The intermediate column consists of the medial aspect of the radius including the lunate fossa and sigmoid notch. The lateral(radial)columnconsistsofthe scaphoid fossa and radial styloid.
Studies of force transmission across the wrist have demon-
stratedmoreforcestransmittedthrough theintermediate column than previously thought. When looking at the lunate facet of the distal radius, the axial forces vary between 29% and 44% of the total axial force (Rikli DA, personal communication). Onecan therefore view therole of theradialcolumnasa stability column, providing abony buttress for the carpus and the origin for the stabilizing capsular ligaments. In contrast, the intermediate column functions in load transmission and serves as the “keystone” to the radiocarpal joint. The ulnar column serves both for load transmission and stability acting as a“pivot point” for wrist mobility.
With aclearer understanding of the structural anatomy and biomechanics of the distal radius, radiocarpal, and distal radio­ulnar joints, fragment-specific fracture treatment with limited surgicalapproac hesisapplicablefor avariety of fracture patterns.
&
INDICATIONS FOR LIMITED APPROACH OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION
Anumber of specific fracture patterns are amenable to limited exposures for internal fixation. These include fracturesofthe radial column involving the radial styloid, intermediate column
including the volar and/or dorsal lunate facets, and the ulnar column, specifically,the ulnar styloid fracture.
&
CONSIDERATIONS FOR PREOPERATIVE PLANNING
Adistal radius fracturecan affect anyone and therefore it is essential to have aclear understanding of the patient’s activity level, co-morbid medical conditions, independence level, and reliability.During the physical examination it is important to note the neurovascular status of the hand as well as the status of the skin. Excessive skin swelling without median nerve symp­toms benefitsfromaperiod of elevation to facilitate soft­tissue management.
Radiographic examination should include standard ante­roposterior,lateral, and oblique views. In cases of extensive collapse,longitudinaltractionfilmsunder hematomablock anesthesiaare extremely helpful. Computed tomography, with reconstructions in the coronal and sagittal planes as well as three-dimensional reconstructions,ishelpfultoelucidate specific fragments (Fig. 2). During examination of the radio­graphs it is important to note any evidenceofcarpal malalignment or derangement.
Other pieces of information to obtain from the radiographs are fracture fragment recognition and fracture classification. It is essential to recognize radial styloid fragments, lip fragments, volar- and dorsal-ulnar fragments, and ulnar styloid fragments. This knowledge will guide the therapeutic approach. The last piece of information to get from the radiographs is classification as this assists with communication, treatment decisions, and prognosis. Themostthoroughclassi fication system is the AO/ASIF system. It takes into consideration the severity of the skeletal and articular injury.Inthis system the fracturesare divided into extra-articular (type A), partial articular (type B), and complete articular (type C). Each is then subdivided in increasing order of severity (Fig. 3).
&
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Regional block anesthesia is preferred. Preoperative antibiotics aregivenfor prophylaxis.The patientisplaced in the supine positionwiththe extremity on aradiolucenthand table. Apneumatic tourniquet is applied. Fluoroscopy will be required. One should have available avariety of fixation options includingstainlesssteel wire,Kirschnerwires,
external fixation,and anatomicallyshaped pl ates or wire forms. Anumber of limited extensile exposures are available to approach either dorsalorvolar fracture components (Fig. 4).
&
Radial Column Fractures
Shearing fractures of the radial column are classified within the AO/ASIF GroupasB1fractures. The subgroup B1.1 is avertical
shearing-type fracture, whileB1.2repre sentsamulti -frag­mented radial styloid fracture.These fractures may be isolated injuries as aresult of afall on the outstretched hand with the wrist forced into extension and radial deviation. The scaphoid directly transmits the force of impact onto the radial styloid. Styloid fractures can also be seen in association with perilunate dislocations of the carpus. Smaller avulsion fractureswill have the radial capsule attached while larger ones will additionally have the origin of the radioscaphocapitate ligaments. Anatomic reductionand stableinternal fixation of these fractures will restoreboth alignment of the radial column’s buttress as well as the integrity of the supporting ligaments of the wrist.
An attempt should be made to achieve aclosed manip­ulative reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wireorscrew fixation.Whenaclosed reductionisnot successful, open reduction is recommended. Asmall dorsoradial incision will provide excellent exposureofthe fracture and if necessary,the radiocarpal joint (Fig. 4). Stable fixation most often will require one or two screws,but in some instances, asmall radial column platewillhelpbuttressalargeverticallysheared styloid fracture (Figs. 5and 6).
&
Intermediate Column Fractures
Whilethe vast majority of thesefractures are duetoaxial compression of the lunate against the lunate facet, there is a unique fracture pattern involving the dorsal lunate facet charac­terized by avertical shear pattern classified as subgroup B1.3. Dorsal lunate facetcompression fractures are most often a componentofathree-part articular injuryorafo ur-part pattern characterized by asplit of the lunate facet with both dorsal and volar components (Fig. 7). In some instances, the dorsal lunate facet fracture can be reduced through asmall incision and manipulated into place with an elevator,tamp, or pointed awl. Stabilityisachievedwitheitherstrategically placed Kirschner wires or asmall plate or wire-form (Figs. 7 and 8).
Volar lunate facet displacement is less amenable to percu­taneous manipulation and Kirschner wire fixation. Alimited volar incision is made creating an interval between the ulnar artery and nerve, and the flexor tendons (Fig. 9). By elevating
FIGURE 1 Rikli and Regazzoni’s division of the distal radius into three columns (medial, intermediate, and lateral).
FIGURE 2 Computed tomographyscan canassist in elucidatingthe involved columns in complexfractures.
182
&
Nolla and Jupiter
the distal ulnar corner of the pronator quadratus, the volar lunate facet is readily exposed. Internal fixation can be accom­plished either with atension wire technique or asmall plate or wire-form (Figs. 7, 9–12).
&
Ulnar Column
There are instances in which the stability of the distal radioulnar joint will require stable fixation of the ulnar styloid. Following stable fixation of the distal radius fractures, passive forearm rotation will definethe presence of distal radioulnar joint instability.Inthese instances, especially when there is alarge ulnar styloidfracture, fixation of theulnar styloidis recommended.
The ulnar styloid lies relatively anterior to the longitudinal axis of the ulna, thus the surgical approach should be through a small incision over the styloid itself. If done with the forearm supinated, thestyloid will rest in amoredorsalposition, facilitating exposure and internal fixation. The fixation of the ulnar styloid will depend in part upon its size. Small screws, headless screws,ortension band wire or wire-forms are all applicable (Figs. 14 and 15).
&
COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT
Open approaches are at risk of wound healing problems, the most severe being wound necrosis. Prevention is best treatment in these situations. The surgeon should be cautious and not proceed with the surgery until the soft tissues have recovered from the initial soft-tissue trauma.
Complex fractures at times cannot be securely fixed with internal hardwareonly.Inthese cases, it is useful to have an external fixator available. The fixator can help not only with the fracture reduction, but also with maintenance of the reduction. In this situation, the fixator is kept in place for at least three weeks. Bone graft can also be used to supplement fixation, particularly for support of articular fragments. Bone graft will also assist in fracturehealing.
The median nerve and the sensory branches of the radial nerveare at risk during some approaches to thewrist. Excessive retraction of the median nerve can lead to signi­ficant motor and sensory disturbances. Minimizing the use of self-retaining retractors and frequent changing of their positions during volar approaches minimizes the incidence of neuropathies. Careful dorsal dissection minimizes damage to the superficial sensory branches of the radial nerve.
Peritendinous adhesions can severely limit digital motion. This complication is best avoided by covering dorsal and volar hardware with periosteum and/or muscle and by promptly starting adigital and wrist motion protocol soon after surgery. Severe cases that have failed to improve with range of motion exercisesand splintingmay requireoperative tenolysis and capsulotomies.
Dorsal instrumentation places the extensor tendons at risk for complications, namely,tenosynovitis and tendon rupture. Whereas this risk was significant with prior implants, newer implants have been designed with the goal of minimizing tendon irritation. If tenosynovitis is still encountered, it is best addressedbyplate removal. Tendon ruptureisbest addressedwith plate remo valand an appropriate tendon transfer.
&
OUTCOMES
The important aspect in obtainingagood result in these fracturesisattaining and maintaining an adequate articular alignment (9,10). Work by Jakob and colleagues using the same principles outlined above revealed greater than 95%
A
B
C
A1
B1
C1
A2
B2
C2
A3
B3
C3
FIGURE 3 AO/ASIF classification of distal radius fractures. Source: From Ref. 3.
FIGURE 4 Dorsal approaches to the wrist. 1, between the first and second extensor compartments; 2, through the third compartment; 3, betweenthe fourth and fifth compartments; 4, between the fifth and sixth compartments. Source:Adapted from Ref. 4.
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures
&
183