Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5186_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
83 Мб
Скачать
Anti–PD-1(ProgrammedCellDeathReceptor-1)Antibodies
In1992,PD-1(orCD279)wasfirstdescribedbyTasuku Honjoand colleagues.Thename programmedcelldeathreceptorwaschosen,sincethereceptorwasbelievedtobeinvolved in T-cell death (214). Later, PD-1 was found to be an immune checkpoint. The tyrosine phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 (src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase) mediate PD-1’sinhibitory function, dephosphorylating signaling molecules downstream of theT-cellreceptor(TCR)andtherebyinhibitingcytokineproduction,forexample,IL-2and IFN-ɣ,andT-cellproliferation.
PD-1isacellsurfacereceptorandincontrasttoCTLA-4,isexpressedonawidevariety ofcells, including CD4 andCD8T cells,Bcells,monocytes, natural killer(NK) cells, anddendriticcells(215217).PD-1isnotexpressedonrestingTcellsbutcanbeinduced
uponactivation(218).Itcanalsobeinducedonantigen-presentingcells(APCs)(219).PD-1 hastwoligands,PD-L1(orCD274orB7-H1)(220,221)andPD-L2(orCD273orB7-DC) (222).PD-L1isexpressedbymany celltypesincludingepithelial,endothelial,andstromal cells. Its expression is induced by proinflammatory cytokines such as interferons, tumor necrosisfactor(TNF),andVEGF.PD-L2isexpressedbyantigen-presentingcells.
UponTCRactivation,TcellsproduceIFN-f,thestrongeststimulatorofreactivePD-L1 expression.RepeatedexposuretocognateantigenstherebyresultsinhighPD-L1expression
andcontinuousPD-1signalingwhichcontinuouslycounteractsthestimulatoryeffectofthe antigenandeventuallyinducesT-cellexhaustion.T-cellexhaustionisastateofacquiredT- celldysfunctionandahallmarkofchronicinfection(223)andcancer(224).Itisdefined by progressive poor effector function and sustained expression of inhibitory receptors. Immune checkpoint inhibition using PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors aims to reverse T-cell exhaustion.
CurrentlyavailablemonoclonalantibodiesrecognizethereceptorPD-1andtheligand PD-L1.Forthediscussionoftherelevantclinicaltrials,seeChapters9,10,and11.
Pembrolizumab(MK-3475,Keytruda)
Pembrolizumabisahumanizedmonoclonalanti–PD-1IgG4antibody.Itdoesnotactivate complementorbindFcreceptors,andtherebyavoidscytotoxiceffectsonTcells.Itbindsto thePD-1receptorandblockstheinteractionwithPD-L1.
Nivolumab(Opdivo)
Nivolumabis ahuman monoclonalanti–PD-1IgG4 antibody.Comparisonofthe amino acid sequences of pembrolizumaband nivolumab shows that they are essentially identical exceptforthevariableregionsthatbindtheantigen(225).CrystalstructuresofPD-L1bound
toPD-1(226)aswellascrystalstructuresofthePD-1ectodomainincomplexwiththeFab fragmentsofpembrolizumabandnivolumabareavailable(227229).Thesecrystalstructures suggestasimilarmechanismforbothantibodies;theycompetitivelyblockPD-L1bindingby sterichindrance.However,pembrolizumabshowsagreateroverlapwiththePD-L1–binding site than nivolumab. In fact, there is apparently no overlap between the binding sites of pembrolizumabandnivolumabonthePD-1molecule,sothatbasedonthecrystalstructure, simultaneous binding of the two PD-1 antibodies is possible. For the discussion of the pertinentclinicaldata,seeChapters9,10,and11.
There are emerging data on the combined use of the two different immune checkpoint inhibitors,thatis,ipilimumab,aCTLA-4antibody,andnivolumab,aPD-1antibody.A recent phase II trial of this combination treatment in patients with advanced rare malignanciesincludedacohortof17patientswithgynecologicmalignancies.Theresponse rate was reported to be 41%, with another 29% of patient having stable disease (230). Another randomized phase II trial reported a response rate of 31.4% for this combination treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (231). It has been hypothesizedthat the differentmechanisms of thecheckpointimmune inhibitors potentiate theireffect.Whileanti–CTLA-4antibodiesimproveearlyactivationandprimingofTcellsin lymphnodes,antibodiestargetingthePD-(L)1systemactlaterintheprocessofT-celltumor attackandlocallyinthetumormicroenvironment.
Anti–PD-L1(ProgrammedCellDeathReceptorLigand-1) Antibodies
Durvalumab(Imfinzi)
Durvalumab is a human monoclonal IgG1 antibody. The crystal structure of the PD­L1/durvalumabcomplexisavailable(232).
Avelumab(Bavencio)
Avelumab is a human monoclonal IgG1 antibody. The crystal structure of the PD­L1/avelumabcomplexisavailable.ThebindingsiteofavelumabonPD-L1partiallyoverlaps with PD-L1’s binding site to PD-1, thereby ligand-receptor binding is sterically hindered (233). In a phase II trial of patients with mismatch repair-deficient recurrent
endometrialcancer,avelumab showedan objectiveresponserate of26% regardlessof PD-L1expressionstatus(234).
Atezolizumab(Tecentriq)
Atezolizumabisafully humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody.The crystal structure ofthe PD-L1/atezolizumabcomplexis available. Atezolizumab competes with PD-1 for the same
PD-L1surface(235).
ResistanceMechanismstoImmuneCheckpointInhibition
Variousresistancemechanismstoimmunecheckpointinhibitorshavebeendescribedandan understandingoftheircomplexityisemerging.Theseinclude:
immunoediting,thatis,interactionsbetweentheimmunesystemandcancercells,results in the selection of cell clones that lack neoantigens and exhibit poor immunogenicity (236);
downregulationofthemajor histocompatibility complex-I (MHC-I) and thereby loss of antigenpresentation(237), or loss of β2-microglobulin function, which disrupts proper MHC-IfoldingandMHC-Itransporttothecellsurface(238);
establishment of an immunosuppressive and tumor promoting microenvironment characterized by increased infiltration with regulatory T cells (Tregs) (239) and M2 macrophages(240) mediated by immune modulating cytokines, including TGF-β (241) andVEGF-A(242);
expression of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) that converts tryptophan to kynurenine. Kynurenine accumulation has been associated with suppression of T-cell function(243);
enhanced co-expression of multiple immune checkpoints including TIM-3 (T-cell immunoglobulinmucindomain-3 protein), LAG-3 (lymphocyte-activation gene 3), and BTLA (B and T lymphocyte attenuator), which are associated with severe T-cell exhaustion(244246);
antibioticusecan shiftthe relativeabundanceof bacterialspecies intheintestinalflora, reduceitsdiversityandtherebyinduceimmunecheckpointinhibitorresistance(247).This is likely to be based on decreased cross-reactivity between microbiome and tumor antigens,togetherwithdecreasedantigenpresentationandcytokineproduction(248,249).
TherapeuticCancerVaccines
Most cancer vaccines are designed to induce antitumor immune responses against specifictumor-associatedantigens(TAA).TAAsmaybe(i)antigensthatareoverexpressed
in cancers, such as Her2/Neu, or mesothelin, (ii) cancer/germline antigens that are only expressedingermlinecells,butcanbereexpressedincancercells,forexample,MAGE-A1 (melanomaassociatedantigen),NY-ESO-1(NewYorkesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
1),and(iii) celllineagedifferentiationantigens,suchas tyrosinaseand gp100.Therapeutic cancer vaccines are classified by how the TAA is delivered. The classifications are (i) peptide/protein-based,(ii)cell-based,(iii)DNA/RNA-based, or(iv) glycan-based.Vaccines canbegivenaloneoralongwithcytokinesorotherstimulatingfactors.Thedevelopmentof
therapeuticcancervaccineshasfacedthefollowingchallenges:(i)lowimmunogenicity,
(ii)establisheddiseaseburden,and (iii)immunosuppressivetumormicroenvironment.
Examplesoftherapeutic cancervaccinesthathavebeen usedforgynecologicmalignancies arepresented.
Peptide/Protein-BasedVaccines
Coley’sfirstvaccination,theColey’stoxin,fallsintothiscategory(182).Mixturesofovarian cancer peptides (250) or peptide fragments of the Her/2Neu receptor have been tested, mainlyinthepreclinicalsetting(251).
NY-ESO-1(NewYorkEsophagealSquamousCellCarcinoma1)
NY-ESO-1isaso-calledcancer-testisantigen(CTA).Itsexpressionisrestrictedtotesticular germcellsandplacentaltrophoblastswithnooronlylowexpressioninnormaladultsomatic cells.However,itisreexpressed innumerouscancer typesandtherebyisagoodtargetfor cancerimmunotherapy(252).Forovariancancervaccinations,epitopesofNY-ESO-1aswell asthe fullproteinhave beenused (253,254). PhaseItrials in ovarian cancerhave been of limitedsuccess,possiblyrelatedtothelowimmunogenicityofthevaccine(255).
DPX-Survivac
DPX-survivac is a mix of HLA (human leukocyte antigen) class I peptides designed to trigger T-cell responses against survivin. This vaccine has been used for recurrent ovarian cancerincombinationwithlow-dosecyclophosphamideandepacadostat(256).Thevaccine
was well tolerated and showed antitumor response, with disease control in 9 of 13 patients. A correlation between tumor size and response was noted with lesions ≤5 cm
displayingincreasedtumorregression.ThisphaseIb/IItrialisongoing,withaphaseIIpart that randomizes DPX-survivac and cyclophosphamide with and without epacadostat. The latterisaninhibitorofIDO-1(indoleamine2,3-dioxygenase-1)thatmayenhanceeffectorT­cell proliferation. Preliminary results have revealed that DPX-survivac with cyclophosphamideinducesastrongT-cellresponse,evenwithoutepacadostat(257).
Cell-BasedVaccines
Themajorityofcell-basedvaccineshaveuseddendriticcells.Theseantigen-presenting cellscanbederivedfromapatient’sownmonocytes.Afterleukapheresis,themonocytes aredifferentiatedexvivointoimmaturedendriticcells,whicharethenstimulatedand loadedwithantigensandtherebymatured. Thematuredendritic cells present tumor antigens on their major histocompatibility complexes. Finally, these mature dendritic cells are administered to the patient. Once reinfused, the mature dendritic cells will
migratetolymphoidorgansandactivateeffectorcellsoftheimmunesystem,primarilyTand B cells. In this way, it is hoped that cancer immunosuppression might be overcome and
immunosurveillance reinstated. Dendritic cells have been loaded with (i) tumor lysates (258,259)or(ii)syntheticpeptides,forexample,fusionproteinsofHer2/NeuandGM-CSF (260)orpeptidesderivedfromWT-1,MUC-1,andCa-125(261).
DendriticCellVaccine(DCVAC)
Forthe DCVAC/OvCarandomized phaseII trial,dendriticcellswereloaded withantigens obtainedfromovariancancercelllinelysates(262).Theinterimanalysisofthistrialhas
shown a 6-month increase in the progression-free survival, and a trend toward an increasedoverallsurvival inthegroupthat receivedchemotherapyplusdendriticcell vaccinemaintenanceafterprimarydebulkingsurgery(263).
DNA/RNA-BasedVaccines
Recombinant vaccinia and fowlpox vectors for prime and booster vaccinations have been usedtoinduceinvivoexpressionofthetumor-associatedantigensinsomaticcellssuchas keratinocytesormyocytes.Thisapproachhasbeentestedinovariancancerusingthegenetic information of NY-ESO-1 (264) and the combination of CEAand MUC-1 combined with costimulatoryproteins(265).
EngineeredListeriaMonocytogenes
Attenuated live Listeria monocytogenes have been used as bacterial vectors. Listeria are facultativeintracellular bacteria. Inthecytoplasm, Listeria can induce MHC classIand II pathwaysandtherebyT-cellresponses(266)anddecreasedregulatoryTcells(267).Inearly cervical cancer studies, Listeria was used to deliver an HPV E7 plasmid, but the risk of plasmid loss or antibiotic resistance was noted (268). More recently, Listeria has been engineeredtoexpressalisteriolysin-E7fusionproteinwhichhasbeensuccessfullyappliedin preclinicalmodels(269).InaphaseIItrialoflisteriolysin-E7fusionproteininpatients
with recurrentand persistent cervical cancer, overall survival with vaccination alone wasthesame as when combined with cisplatin (8.8 vs. 8.3 months, respectively), and therewasapromising34.9%combined12-monthoverallsurvivalrate(270).Inovarian
cancer,Listeriahasbeenusedtoexpressmesothelin(271).
Glycan-BasedVaccines
Most cancer cells display an altered glycosylation pattern (272). In fact, cancer cells are likelytobeusinguniqueglycosylationpatternsforimmuneevasion(273).Pureglycan-based vaccines,however,have shownonlymodest successbecause of poorimmunogenicity,and needtobeconjugatedtohelperT-cellepitopes(274).
Lewis(y)
In a phase I trial, the synthetic pentasaccharide Lewis was coupled to the KLH (keyhole limpet hemocyanin) carrier protein and used to vaccinate patients with recurrent and persistent ovarian cancer. At 18 months follow-up, 5 of 24 patients showed a complete response(275).
AdoptiveCellTherapy
Adoptivecelltherapyisalsoknownascellularimmunotherapy.Adoptivecelltherapy usesthepatient’s own immune cells by (i) extracting Tinfiltrating lymphocytes from tumor tissue (TILs), or by (ii) engineering autologous T cells with tumor antigen– specific surface receptor molecules. T-cell receptor (TCR) therapy, chimeric antigen receptor(CAR) T-celltherapy, andmorerecentlyengineered naturalkiller(NK) cells are
beingstudied in various clinicaltrials.Among the most commontargetsfor TCR orCAR directedcelltherapyareNY-ESO1,mesothelin,andthefolatereceptor.
Tumor-InfiltratingLymphocytes(TILs)Therapy
Inthe1980s,StevenRosenbergandcolleaguesperformedthefirstpreclinicalstudiesinmice withtumor-infiltratinglymphocytes(TILs).TheTILswereisolated,exvivostimulated,and reinfused(276). Similarto theoriginalexperiments, thecurrentTIL therapyincludesex
vivo expansion of TILs from resected primary tumor material, and reinfusion of expanded TILs. Cell infusion is preceded by a lymphocyte-depleting conditioning regimenandfollowedbyhigh-doseinterleukin-2support.Earlyclinicalstudiesusingthis
approachforcervicalcancerhavebeenpromising(277).A recenttwo-cohort phaseIItrial hasreporteda28%responserateintherecurrentmetastaticcervicalcancercohort(278).The
interimanalysisof anongoingphaseIItrialshoweda 44%objectiveresponseratein recurrent,metastatic,orpersistentcervicalcancer(279).
EngineeredT-CellReceptor(TCR)Therapy
PeripheralbloodTcellscanalsobeisolated.IfT-cellreceptorsdonotrecognizetumor antigens,T cells canbegeneticallymodified so that theirTCRsspecifically recognize and target tumor antigens. In order to be recognized by the TCR, antigens have to be
presented by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Many cancer cells, however, escapeT-cellimmuneresponsebydownregulationorlossofMHCs,whichlimitsthebenefit ofTCRtherapy(280).
NY-ESO-1
c259
Tcells
There is a clinical trial evaluating different lymphodepleting regimens, that is, cyclophosphamideversuscyclophosphamideplusfludarabine,inrecurrentplatinum-resistant ovariancancerthat showedthefeasibilityofthe approach(281).Twoof sixpatientshada
completeresponse(282).
EngineeredT-CellChimericAntigenReceptor(CAR)Therapy
IncontrasttoTCRtherapy,CARTcellsrecognizeandtargettumorcellsindependent of MHC expression in tumor cells(283). CARs comprise four parts: (i) an extracellular
antigen recognition region derived from a specific antibody, (ii) an extracellular stalk domain,(iii)a transmembranedomain,and(iv)an intracellularsignalingcomponent.CAR structureshavenowevolvedintofourgenerations,withthemaindifferencebeingadditional intracellular costimulatory domains. The first generation of CAR T cells showed only minimalefficacyanddurability(284).Toimprovetheefficacy,acostimulatorydomainwas addedtothesecond-generation,dual-fusionCARreceptors.Forthethird-generation,triple­fusionreceptorsofCARs,twocostimulatorydomainswereadded.Costimulatorymolecules includeCD28orCD27,4-1BB,andOX-40(285).ThefourthgenerationofCARscomprises an inducible element such as the NFAT-responsive (nuclear factor of the activated T cell) expression cassette that facilitates expression and secretion of transgenic cytokines, particularlyIL-12(interleukin-12)uponT-cell activation.SecretedIL-12helpsregulatethe tumor microenvironment (286) (see Fig. 3.4). Preclinical studies of CAR-T cells have demonstratedefficacyinovariancancermodels(287).
Figure 3.4 T-cell receptors (TCRs) and CAR (chimeric antigen receptors) T cells. EngineeredT-cellreceptorsto specifically recognize andtarget tumor antigens. CAR T cells comprisetheextracellularantigenrecognitionregionderivedfroma specificantibody.Forthe secondandthirdgeneration,co-stimulatorydomainswere added, for example, CD28 and 4­1BB,toincreasedurabilityoftheCARTcells.ThefourthgenerationofCARTcells,alsocalled TRUCKs(Tcellsredirectedforuniversal cytokine-mediatedkilling),arearmedwithadditional cytokine expression. Upon antigen recognition and T-cell response, an inducible response element, here for example NFAT (nuclear factor of the activated T cell), will activate the expressionoftransgenicinterleukin-12(IL-12).
NaturalKiller(NK)CellTherapy
Morerecently,otherimmunecellshavebeenusedforadoptivecelltherapy,includingnatural killercells. Sometrials havestudied intravenousinfusions ofallogeneicnaturalkillercells fromhaplo-identicalrelateddonorsafterlymphodepletingregimens(288).OnephaseIItrial has shown a response rate of 29% and stable disease in 57% in patients with platinum­refractory ovarian cancer (289). Studies are ongoing to equip NK cells efficiently with cancer-specificCARs(290).
References
1. EhrlichP.ChemotherapeutischeTrypanosomen-Studien.BerlinerKlinischeWochenschrift1907;44:233–236.
2. DarAC, Shokat KM. The evolution of protein kinase inhibitors from antagonists to agonists ofcellular signaling.
AnnuRevBiochem2011;80:769–795.
3. ZuccottoF, ArdiniE,CasaleE,etal.Throughthe“gatekeeperdoor”:exploitingtheactivekinaseconformation.J
MedChem2010;53(7):2681–2694.
4. LambaV,GhoshI.Newdirectionsintargetingproteinkinases:focusingupontrueallostericandbivalentinhibitors.
CurrPharmDes2012;18(20):2936–2945.
5. SchilderRJ, SillMW, Chen X,et al. Phase II study of gefitinibin patients with relapsed orpersistent ovarian or
primaryperitonealcarcinomaandevaluationofepidermalgrowthfactorreceptormutationsandimmunohistochemical expression:aGynecologicOncologyGroupStudy.ClinCancerRes2005;11(15):5539–5548.
6. Posadas EM,Liel MS,Kwitkowski V, etal. Aphase II and pharmacodynamic study of gefitinib in patients with
refractoryorrecurrentepithelialovariancancer.Cancer2007;109(7):1323–1330.
7. Lacroix L, Pautier P, Duvillard P, et al. Response of ovarian carcinomas to gefitinib-carboplatin-paclitaxel
combinationisnotassociatedwithEGFRkinasedomainsomaticmutations.IntJCancer2006;118(4):1068–1069.
8. WagnerU,du BoisA, PfistererJ,et al. Gefitinib in combination with tamoxifen in patients with ovarian cancer
refractory or resistant to platinum-taxane based therapy–a phase II trial of the AGO Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR2.6).GynecolOncol2007;105(1):132–137.
9. GoncalvesA,FabbroM,LhommeC,etal.AphaseIItrialtoevaluategefitinibassecond-orthird-linetreatmentin
patientswithrecurringlocoregionallyadvancedormetastaticcervicalcancer.GynecolOncol2008;108(1):42–46.
10. BalakMN,GongY,RielyGJ,etal.NovelD761YandcommonsecondaryT790Mmutationsinepidermalgrowth
factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinomas with acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12(21):6494–6501.
11. Yun CH, Mengwasser KE, Toms AV, et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by
increasingtheaffinityforATP.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA2008;105(6):2070–2075.
12. EngelmanJA,ZejnullahuK,MitsudomiT,etal.METamplificationleadstogefitinibresistanceinlungcancerby
activatingERBB3signaling.Science2007;316(5827):1039–1043.
13. BeanJ,BrennanC,ShihJY,etal.METamplificationoccurswithorwithoutT790MmutationsinEGFRmutantlung
tumorswithacquiredresistancetogefitiniborerlotinib.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA2007;104(52):20932–20937.
14. Jones HE, Goddard L, Gee JM, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor signalling and acquired resistance to
gefitinib(ZD1839;Iressa)inhumanbreastandprostatecancercells.EndocrRelatCancer2004;11(4):793–814.
15. SosML, Koker M, Weir BA,et al. PTEN loss contributes to erlotinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lungcancer by
activationofAktandEGFR.CancerRes2009;69(8):3256–3261.
16. GordonAN,FinklerN,EdwardsRP,etal.EfficacyandsafetyoferlotinibHCl,anepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor
(HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: results from a phase II multicenterstudy.IntJGynecolCancer2005;15(5):785–792.
17. BlankSV,ChristosP,CurtinJP,etal.Erlotinibaddedtocarboplatinandpaclitaxelasfirst-linetreatmentofovarian
cancer:aphaseIIstudybasedonsurgicalreassessment.GynecolOncol2010;119(3):451–456.
18. VergoteIB,JimenoA,Joly F,etal.RandomizedphaseIIIstudyof erlotinibversusobservationinpatientswith no
evidence of disease progression after first-line platin-based chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma: a European OrganisationforResearchandTreatmentofCancer-GynaecologicalCancerGroup,andGynecologicCancerIntergroup
study.JClinOncol2014;32(4):320–326.
19. KawamotoT,SatoJD,LeA,etal.GrowthstimulationofA431cellsbyepidermal growth factor:identificationof
high-affinityreceptorsforepidermalgrowthfactorbyananti-receptormonoclonalantibody.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 1983;80(5):1337–1341.
20. Gill GN, Kawamoto T,Cochet C, et al. Monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies which are
inhibitorsofepidermalgrowthfactor binding and antagonists of epidermalgrowthfactorbindingand antagonists of epidermalgrowthfactor-stimulatedtyrosineproteinkinaseactivity.JBiolChem1984;259(12):7755–7760.
21. MasuiH,KawamotoT,SatoJD, etal.Growthinhibitionofhumantumorcellsinathymicmicebyanti-epidermal
growthfactorreceptormonoclonalantibodies.CancerRes1984;44(3):1002–1007.
22. Mendelsohn J. Blockade of receptors for growth factors: an anticancer therapy—the fourth annual Joseph H.
Burchenal American Association of Cancer Research Clinical Research Award Lecture. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6(3):747–753.
23. LievreA, Bachet JB, Le CorreD, etal. KRASmutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in
colorectalcancer.CancerRes2006;66(8):3992–3995.
24. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced
colorectalcancer.NEnglJMed2008;359(17):1757–1765.
25. Hsu HC, Thiam TK, Lu YJ, et al. Mutations of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF predict cetuximab resistance in metastatic
colorectalcancerpatients.Oncotarget2016;7(16):22257–22270.
26. SecordAA, BlessingJA, ArmstrongDK, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab and carboplatin in relapsed platinum-
sensitive ovarian cancer and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Groupstudy.GynecolOncol2008;108(3):493–499.
27. Konner J, Schilder RJ, DeRosa FA, et al. A phase II study of cetuximab/paclitaxel/carboplatin for the initial
treatment of advanced-stage ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopiantube cancer.GynecolOncol 2008;110(2):140–
145.
28. LetoSM,Sassi F,CatalanoI,etal. Sustained inhibitionof HER3 andEGFR is necessaryto induce regressionof
HER2-amplifiedgastrointestinalcarcinomas.ClinCancerRes2015;21(24):5519–5531.
29. RusnakDW,LackeyK,AffleckK,etal.Theeffectsofthenovel,reversibleepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor/ErbB-2
tyrosinekinaseinhibitor,GW2016,onthegrowthofhuman normalandtumor-derivedcelllinesinvitroandinvivo. MolCancerTher2001;1(2):85–94.
30. Scaltriti M, VermaC, Guzman M, et al. Lapatinib, a HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induces stabilization and
accumulationofHER2andpotentiatestrastuzumab-dependentcellcytotoxicity.Oncogene2009;28(6):803–814.
31. ClausJ,PatelG,AutoreF,etal.Inhibitor-inducedHER2-HER3heterodimerisationpromotesproliferationthrougha
noveldimerinterface.Elife2018;7.
32. CanoniciA,IversL,ConlonNT,etal.HER-targetedtyrosinekinaseinhibitorsenhanceresponsetotrastuzumaband
pertuzumabinHER2-positivebreastcancer.InvestNewDrugs2019;37(3):441–451.
33. GarciaAA,SillMW,LankesHA,etal.AphaseIIevaluationoflapatinibinthetreatmentofpersistentorrecurrent
epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124(3):569–574.
34. MolinaJR,KaufmannSH,ReidJM,etal.Evaluationoflapatinibandtopotecancombinationtherapy:tissueculture,
murinexenograft,andphaseIclinicaltrialdata.ClinCancerRes2008;14(23):7900–7908.
35. LheureuxS,KriegerS,WeberB,etal.Expectedbenefitsoftopotecancombinedwithlapatinibinrecurrentovarian
canceraccordingtobiologicalprofile:aphase2trial.IntJGynecolCancer2012;22(9):1483–1488.
36. KonecnyGE,Venkatesan N,YangG,etal.Activityof lapatinibanovelHER2andEGFRdual kinaseinhibitorin
humanendometrialcancercells.BrJCancer2008;98(6):1076–1084.
37. LeslieKK,SillMW,LankesHA,etal.LapatinibandpotentialprognosticvalueofEGFRmutationsinaGynecologic
OncologyGroupphaseIItrialofpersistentorrecurrentendometrialcancer.GynecolOncol2012;127(2):345–350.
38. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Liu C, et al. Neratinib induces ErbB2 ubiquitylation and endocytic degradation via HSP90
dissociationinbreastcancercells.CancerLett2016;382(2):176–185.
39. MenderesG,BonazzoliE,BelloneS,etal.Efficacyof neratinib in the treatment of HER2/neu-amplified epithelial
ovariancarcinomainvitroandinvivo.MedOncol2017;34(5):91.
40. HanC,AltwegerG,MenderesG,etal.Thecombinationofolaparib (Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor) with
neratinib (pan-HER inhibitor) is synergistic in epithelial ovarian carcinoma overexpressing HER2. Gynecol Oncol 2019;154(Suppl1):35.
41. SchwabCL,EnglishDP,RoqueDM,etal.NeratinibshowsefficacyinthetreatmentofHER2/neuamplifieduterine
serouscarcinomainvitroandinvivo.GynecolOncol2014;135(1):142–148.
42. D’SouzaA,RomanLD,SauraC,etal.NeratinibinpatientswithHER2-mutant,metastaticcervicalcancer:findings
fromthephase2SUMMIT‘basket’trial.GynecolOncol2019;154(1):11.
43. Delord JP,Allal C, Canal M, et al. Selective inhibition of HER2 inhibits AKT signal transduction and prolongs
disease-freesurvivalinamicrometastasismodelofovariancarcinoma.AnnOncol2005;16(12):1889–1897.
44. Lane HA, Motoyama AB, Beuvink I, et al. Modulation of p27/Cdk2 complex formation through 4D5-mediated
inhibitionofHER2receptorsignaling.AnnOncol2001;12Suppl1:S21–S22.
45. Molina MA, Codony-Servat J, Albanell J, et al. Trastuzumab (herceptin), a humanized anti-Her2 receptor
monoclonal antibody, inhibits basal and activated Her2 ectodomain cleavage in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61(12):4744–4749.
46. CooleyS,BurnsLJ,RepkaT,etal.Naturalkillercellcytotoxicityofbreastcancertargetsisenhancedbytwodistinct
mechanisms of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against LFA-3 and HER2/neu. Exp Hematol 1999;27(10):1533–1541.
47. ClynesRA,TowersTL,PrestaLG,etal.InhibitoryFcreceptorsmodulateinvivocytotoxicityagainsttumortargets.
NatMed2000;6(4):443–446.
48. Gennari R, Menard S, Fagnoni F, et al. Pilot study of the mechanism of action of preoperative trastuzumab in
patientswithprimaryoperablebreasttumorsoverexpressingHER2.ClinCancerRes2004;10(17):5650–5655.
49. NagataY,LanKH,ZhouX,etal.PTENactivationcontributestotumorinhibitionbytrastuzumab,andlossofPTEN
predictstrastuzumabresistanceinpatients.CancerCell2004;6(2):117–127.
50. NahtaR,Yuan LX,ZhangB,etal.Insulin-likegrowthfactor-Ireceptor/humanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2
heterodimerizationcontributestotrastuzumabresistanceofbreastcancercells.CancerRes2005;65(23):11118–11128.
51. Nagy P, Friedlander E, Tanner M, et al. Decreased accessibility and lack of activation of ErbB2 in JIMT-1, a
herceptin-resistant,MUC4-expressingbreastcancercellline.CancerRes2005;65(2):473–482.
52. Bookman MA, Darcy KM, Clarke-Pearson D, et al. Evaluation of monoclonal humanized anti-HER2 antibody,
trastuzumab,inpatientswithrecurrentor refractory ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma withoverexpressionof HER2:aphaseIItrialoftheGynecologicOncologyGroup.JClinOncol2003;21(2):283–290.
53. Fleming ND, Coleman RL, Tung C, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab with dose-dense paclitaxel as first-line
treatmentinpatientswithadvancedovariancancer.GynecolOncol2017;147(1):41–46.
54. Fader AN, Roque DM, Siegel E, et al. Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin-
paclitaxel-trastuzumabinuterineserouscarcinomasthatoverexpresshumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2/neu.J ClinOncol2018;36(20):2044–2051.
55. LoizosN,XuY,HuberJ,etal.Targetingtheplatelet-derivedgrowthfactorreceptoralphawithaneutralizinghuman
monoclonalantibodyinhibitsthegrowthoftumorxenografts:implicationsasapotentialtherapeutictarget.MolCancer Ther2005;4(3):369–379.
56. StockP,MongaD, TanX, et al.Platelet-derivedgrowthfactorreceptor-alpha:anoveltherapeutictargetinhuman
hepatocellularcancer.MolCancerTher2007;6(7):1932–1941.
57. DeeviDS, Lariccia L,WangS,et al. Inhibition of human osteosarcoma xenograft growth by anti-Platelet derived
growthfactorreceptoralphaantibody,IMC-3G3,aloneandincombinationwithchemotherapy.CancerRes2006;66(8 Suppl):877–877.
58. TapWD,JonesRL,VanTineBA,etal.Olaratumabanddoxorubicinversusdoxorubicinalonefortreatmentofsoft-
tissuesarcoma:anopen-labelphase1bandrandomisedphase2trial.Lancet2016;388(10043):488–497.
59. LillyReportsResultsofPhase3SoftTissueSarcomaStudyofLARTRUVO®.Lilly,2019.
60. WedgeSR,KendrewJ,Hennequin LF,etal. AZD2171: ahighly potent, orallybioavailable, vascular endothelial
growthfactorreceptor-2tyrosinekinaseinhibitorforthetreatmentofcancer.CancerRes2005;65(10):4389–4400.
61. Matulonis UA, Berlin S, Ivy P,et al. Cediranib, an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
kinases, is an active drug in recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(33):5601–5606.
62. LedermannJA,EmbletonAC, RajaF,etal.Cediranibinpatientswithrelapsedplatinum-sensitiveovarian cancer