Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_138_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
87 Мб
Скачать
tion during occlusion). is type of occlusal disharmony may
https://t.me/med1917
or may not aect TMJ function.
Centric Relation
is term, rst developed for fabrication of dentures, has
been used by dentists for decades, with approximately 26 de-
16
nitions.
Centric relation is a position where the condyle sits most superiorly and posteriorly in the mandibular fossa with the articular disk stabilized between the condyle and fossa. It provides a harmonious environment for all the TMJ structures. is denition is similar to the physical therapy denition of “open packed” position where all joint connective soft tissues have the least tension and the joint has the least compression. Some dentists believe that maintaining occlusion in a centric relationship during occlusal adjustment and reconstruction can lead to an optimal outcome. However, not all dentists agree with this philosophy.
Vertical Dimension
Also known as vertical dimension of occlusion, vertical di­mension is a term used in dentistry to indicate the superior-in­ferior relationship of the maxilla and the mandible when the teeth are situated in maximum intercuspation. Imagine a man­dible without teeth compared to a mandible with all teeth with perfect occlusion. e mandible without teeth (as in the case of edentulous condition) would have to close further, resulting in more TMJ compression and more contractile forces from the muscles of mastication when compared to normal.
Freeway Space
Freeway space (FWS) is the space between the occluding surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular teeth when the man­dible is in its physiologic resting position. e normal range of values for FWS is 2 to 4 mm, and it can only be determined clinically or measured through imaging lm.
Clenching
“Clenching” is a parafunctional behavior that can occur during the day or while sleeping at night. It is characterized by excessive activation of the masseter and temporalis muscles which result in excessive compressive force between the posteri­or maxillary and mandibular molars.
Bruxism
Bruxism is excessive teeth grinding, most frequently while sleeping. is nocturnal parafunction typically is accompanied by clenching of the jaw and is usually heightened when the in­dividual is under stress. Bruxism may cause tooth wear and in­creased tone (or tension) of the masticatory musculature.
PATHOLOGIC CONDITIONS
According to the American Academy of Orofacial Pain
21
(AAOP),
TMD can be classied into 3 groups: articular dis-
orders, masticatory muscle disorders, and arthritides. Articular disorders include disk-condyle incoordination, disk displace­ment, fracture, and ankylosis. Masticatory muscle disorders include myofascial pain disorder syndrome (MPDS), myositis, myospasm, dystonia, myobrotic contracture, and neoplasia. Arthritides include capsulitis, synovitis, OA, rheumatoid arthri­tis, and psoriatic arthritis. is classication was published in
22,23
2008,
and still is widely accepted by most clinicians due to
its simple and clear denitions.
ere have been continuing developments in the area of TMD classication by many organizations such as AAOP, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), and the American Academy of Craniomandibular Disorders
24,25
(AACD).
e processes are arduous and complicated in this complex body area. Currently, the most accepted system for re­searchers is the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/ TMD or DC/TMD). is classication system, which includes a second axis to address the psychosocial aspects of the patient with TMD, was designed primarily for clinical research. Future classications that include genetic, epigenetic, and neurobiolog-
26
ical variables have been recommended.
A clinician who is faced with the challenge of making a dif­ferential diagnosis must consider behavior-psychosocial factors in addition to the underlying musculoskeletal condition. e physical therapy diagnoses will be discussed in detail later in this monograph.
PHYSICAL THERAPY EVALUATION
Interview/History
is done for any other condition. Information should be gathered in the initial interview on the patient’s medical history; family history; onset of symptoms; mechanism of injury; and severity, irritability, nature, and stage (SINS) of the condition. It is also important to determine any underlying cause of the current symptoms, when possible. Examples might be the occurrence of a sudden stressful event or a change in coping mechanisms, a recent dental procedure, or a history of recurrent symptoms. In addition to these, it is also important to obtain information on the history of any dental interventions (eg, orthodontic pro­cedure, night splint for nocturnal clenching or bruxing, splint therapy). e Jaw Functional Limitation Scale questionnaire developed for measuring the global functional limitation of the jaw. It can serve as an outcome measurement tool for both clinical and research purposes (Appendix).
Psychological assessment is also important for the manage­ment of patients with TMD, especially in the case of chron­ic myofascial pain. While it is beyond the scope of practice of physical therapist to perform a psychological assessment, a simple screening can be benecial in revealing patient’s psycho­social status, which can guide the physical therapist towards ef­fective management or timely referral to a behavioral specialist,
28
if needed. Harrison et al
recommended 2 questionnaires: e
27
is a validated
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
17
Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety and
https://t.me/med1917
the Graded Chronic Pain Scale. Both questionnaires have been validated and are readily accessed through an internet search.
Examination
A comprehensive physical therapy examination for patients with TMD must include at least the upper quadrant, which includes the head, TMJ, cervical spine, shoulder girdle, and thoracic spine. Several studies have focused on the inuence of
29-31
posture on TMJ function and symptoms.
It is widely rec­ognized that a forward head posture places a negative strain on the TMJ, and proper posture during activities of daily living (ADLs) reduces symptoms.
Potential contributory impairments in other regions such
as the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities should also be taken
32
into consideration during a comprehensive assessment.
33
tino et al
reported the existence of an association between the
occlusal plane and the plantar arches of the feet. Golden
Valen-
34
pos­tulated that weak abdominal muscles, weak neck exor muscles, and abnormal spinal curve all may contribute to TMD. Nico-
35
lakis et al
reported that postural and muscle function abnor­malities appeared to be more common in patients with TMD compared to sex and age-matched controls, leading the authors to recommend postural training for patients with TMD. In a
36
later study, Nicolakis et al
also reported that a more compre­hensive program that included local TMJ exercises, postural training, and relaxation techniques was eective in treatment of ADDwoR. To provide eective treatment for patients with TMD, a physical therapist must consider a more comprehensive approach than focusing solely on treatment to the TMJ area.
A patient’s general posture (forward head, slouching), facial features (asymmetry of facial development), swallowing, and speech patterns can indicate underlying causes of the patient’s symptoms. A quick cranial nerve screening is important to rule out any brain lesion. Measurement of the cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and amount of TMJ opening, lateral excursion, protrusion, retrusion, overbite, and overjet can provide a base­line for future comparison. Auscultation of joint sounds may help support the hypothesis of a joint condition. Palpation of masticatory muscles and joint capsules can help identify soft tissue and connective tissue injury or dysfunction. Joint play assessment of the TMJ and cervical mobility evaluation can guide treatment. Kinematic MRI and ultrasound imaging can provide information on disk stability. Despite the prevalence (as
37
high as 33%) of false-positive MRI ndings
kinematic MRI, if
available and indicated, can help conrm a clinical suspicion of
38
anterior disk displacement with or without reduction.
e following is a brief description of some examination procedures focusing on the TMJ and surrounding structures.
Functional activity
e rst step in the examination process is the observation of posture, speech pattern, parafunctional habits (eg, lip biting,
cheek sucking, nail biting, thumb sucking), mouth breathing, and tongue or jaw thrust during speech or swallowing. Ab­normal breathing and position of the tongue on the oor of the mouth, can alter the alignment between the head, cervical spine, and shoulder girdle via the muscular ring of the max­illa and mandible. e muscular ring consists of the superior pharyngeal constrictor, buccinator, and orbicularis oris muscles, and is connected to the occiput. When tongue thrust or mouth breathing occurs, the ring draws the occiput anteriorly and af­fects the balance (homeostasis) of the TMJ and cervical spine,
32
resulting in a forward head posture. e forward head posture also results in a posterior rotation of the cranium on the cervi­cal spine that can further impact the alignment of the shoulder girdle and the entire spine. erefore, it is important to assess tongue thrust and breathing pattern as part of the initial assess­ment before treatment planning
Range of motion
While cervical spine ROM can be measured with a goni-
ometer or an inclinometer, TMJ opening is measured by either
39
a regular ruler or a specially designed disposable tool.
e measurement tool is placed on top of one of the mandibular central incisors and the measurement is taken from the dis­tance between that mandibular incisor and the corresponding maxillary central incisor (Figure 7). Both pain-free as well as maximum (within pain tolerance) mouth opening can be mea­sured. Lateral excursion is measured from the line between the mandibular central incisors to the line between the maxillary central incisors when the patient’s mandible is moved from the center to one side (Figure 8). e amount of lateral excursion is usually one-fourth of TMJ opening. For example, if the open­ing is 40 mm, the estimated lateral excursion should be 10 mm in each direction. Knowing this ratio, the clinician can predict opening range from lateral excursion range, or vice versa. Simi­larly, mandibular opening will improve in direct proportion to regaining lateral excursion ROM. Protrusion is the amount of anterior translation of the mandible, which is normally 6 to 9 mm. Retrusion is posterior translation and is normally 3 mm. Values less than normal in any direction may indicate TMJ hy­pomobility, capsular tightness, masticatory muscle spasm, or fear of movement due to pain.
Opening and closing patterns
Aberrant movement of the mandible during opening and closing of the mouth is indicative of muscular or joint dysfunc­tion. An “S” curve of opening (mandible deviates in an “S”­shaped pathway during opening) without pain, may indicate muscle imbalance or muscle incoordination, or potentially ADDwR. If pain or limited opening is present, this may indicate involvement of the disk or the capsule. A “C” curve of open­ing (mandible deviates to one side in the middle of opening and returns to center at the end of opening) may be caused by
18
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Figure 7.
https://t.me/med1917
Measurement of Mouth Opening
Figure 8.
Measurement of Lateral Excursion
ADDwR and is reective of the jaw returning to the center once the disc is relocated.
When the mouth deects to one side during opening with­out returning to the center at the end of the range, this is termed deection. Deection is indicative of an asymmetry in the amount of anterior translation of the articular condyle on the articular eminence between the right and left TMJ. Deection at the end of mouth opening can occur in 3 clinical scenarios. (1) It can be indicative of ADDwoR, with deection occurring to the side of the ADDwoR, because the anteriorly displaced disk prevents anterior translation of the condyle on the aected side while the condyle on the contralateral side continues to translate forward, causing deection of the mandible toward the aected side. (2) It could also be an indication of limited capsu­lar mobility (tightness). In this clinical scenario, the patient will have limited TMJ opening with deection to the ipsilateral side, again due to the limited anterior translation of the condyle on the aected side. In both of the above scenarios, protrusion will similarly result in deection of the jaw toward the aected side and the patient will show normal lateral excursion toward the aected side but limited lateral excursion toward the contralat­eral side.
30
(3) In contrast to the above scenarios where mouth opening is expected to be somewhat limited, the third clinical condition where deection may occur is with unilateral TMJ hypermobility. In this scenario, excessive mouth opening will likely be noted with deection away from the hypermobile side
secondary to the excessive anterior translation of the condyle on the articular eminence on that side. With jaw protrusion, de­ection will also occur away from the hypermobile side. Finally, in this third scenario, lateral excursion will be normal toward the aected side and will be excessive when performed away from the aected side.
Note that all 3 scenarios described in the previous para­graph imply unilateral dysfunction; in contrast, bilateral TMJ dysfunction would result in limited mouth opening without deection in the rst 2 scenarios and excessive mouth opening without deection in the third scenario. However, the pattern of opening and TMJ motion should not be the only criteria used to make a diagnosis.
Occlusal measurements
e measurement of overjet, indicating how far the maxil­lary teeth are protruding in front of the mandibular teeth (Fig- ure 6) is performed by asking the patient to perform maximal intercuspation by biting down with the back molars (closed
40
pack position) after swallowing.
en, a ruler is placed under the maxillary central incisors to measure the distance between the maxillary central incisors and the mandibular central in­cisors. e normal overjet is 3 to 6 mm which is Class I (nor­mal) occlusion. In Class II occlusion, overjet is greater than 6 mm. In Class III occlusion, the overjet is negative which means
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
19
the mandibular teeth are either edge to edge with the maxillary
https://t.me/med1917
teeth or protruded in front of the maxillary teeth.
Overbite indicates the portion of the mandibular central incisors that is overlapped by the maxillary central incisors (Fig- ure 6). Keeping the ruler in place on the mandibular central incisors, the patient is asked to open their mouth gently. e overbite is quantied by measuring the distance between the mark from the ruler to the top margin of the mandibular cen­tral incisors. e normal range of overbite is one-fourth to one­third of the height of the mandibular central incisors.
Overbite and overjet measurements can indicate the type of occlusion but may also be inuenced by dysfunction in the TMJ musculature. Changes in these measurements may occur following treatment focused on muscle guarding and spasm, suggesting the need to address the TMJ musculature prior to occlusal treatment by the dentist.
lar ligament, (5) posterior inferior synovium, (6) posterior su­perior synovium, (7) posterior ligament-bilaminar zone, and (8) retrodiskal pad. Figure 9 provides a detailed description of Ro-
56
cabado’s pain map.
is is an advanced skill that needs train­ing and practice for accuracy, but the reliability and validity of this palpation have not been tested.
e retrodiskal pad can be palpated behind the condy­lar head when the patient opens their mouth and the condyle translates anteriorly. It can also be palpated with the tip of the small nger located in the external auditory canal, using a slight anteriorly directed force with the pad of the nger. is tech­nique makes it possible to palpate the area with mouth either open or closed. Pain will be elicited in the presence of an inam­matory process.
Intraoral examination
Scalloping of the tongue (ridges on the edge of the tongue) are caused by impressions of the teeth from parafunctions such as nocturnal bruxism. Irregularity on the buccal tissues also in­dicates the possibility of clenching or bruxing.
Palpation of masticatory muscles
e muscles of mastication (masseter, temporalis, supra­hyoid, and infrahyoid muscles) and of the cervical spine (pos­terior cervical, sternocleidomastoid [SCM], scalene muscles, etc) should be palpated to identify the presence of tenderness, tightness, or trigger points. ese muscles can be located using standard anatomical landmarks and are palpated extraorally.
Palpation of the pterygoid muscles can be done intraorally. e medial pterygoid muscle can be located by following the maxillary arch to the area posterior to the back molar, or by following the mandibular arch to the posterior molar and mov­ing superiorly. e patient is then asked to close the mandible gently; the belly of the medial pterygoid muscle will contract under the palpating nger, conrming its location.
e ability to palpate the lateral pterygoid muscle is debat­ed among researchers. Based on their systematic review, Turp
41
and Minagi
concluded that the lateral pterygoid muscle was not palpable. e so-called “pterygoid region” is considered the closest area to the lateral pterygoid muscle; the examiner pal­pates this region by moving the small nger to the area posterior and superior to the maxillary back molar. Although this area is usually sensitive in healthy people, increased tenderness on the involved side is almost always reported by patients with TMD.
Palpation of joint capsule, ligaments, and retrodiskal pad
42
A pain map was developed by Rocabado
to help guide a systematic palpation process for the TMJ structures, including the capsule, ligaments, and retrodiskal pad. ere are 8 palpa­tion sites: (1) anterior inferior synovium, (2) anterior superior synovium, (3) lateral collateral ligament, (4) temporomandibu-
Figure 9.
Pain Map of the Temporomandibular
Joint
1, anterior inferior synovium: anterior inferior to condylar neck. 2, anterior superior synovium: an­terior superior to condylar neck. 3, lateral collateral ligament: lateral protrusion of condylar head during mouth opening. 4, temporomandibular ligament: posterior inferior to #3. 5, posterior inferior synovi­um: posterior inferior aspect of condylar head when patient moves mandible to contralateral side. 6, pos­terior superior synovium: posterior superior aspect of condylar head when patient moves mandible to con­tralateral side. 7, posterior ligament-bilamina zone: physical therapist moves patient’s mandible posteri­or-superiorly, with thumb on back molar intraorally. 8, retrodiskal pad: maintain #7 position, then move the mandible anteriorly to pressure the retrodiskal tissue. Reprinted with permission from Mariano Ro-
42
cabado.
Joint Pain Map: Dierential Diagnosis of the Synovial Temporomandibular Joint. Santiago, Chile: CEDIME Publications; 2010.
20
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Capsular mobility
https://t.me/med1917
Capsular mobility of the TMJ is assessed by applying a lon­gitudinal distraction force on the posterior mandibular molar along the vertical axis of the mandibular ramus. Gentle medial and lateral movement can also be applied to assess the exibility or stiness of the capsule. More details on the techniques are provided later in the treatment section.
Joint sounds
Joint sounds can be assessed by palpation or auscultation. To palpate the TMJ, which is typically done for both TMJs at the same time, place the index ngers in front of the tragus and ask the patient to open and close their mouth. Feel for vibration of the sound through the skin or listen for the joint sound by using a stethoscope.
e quality of the joint sound can be described as click­ing, crackling, popping, or crepitus. Crepitus and crackling are usually associated with arthritic changes; clicking and popping sounds may be caused by an ADDwR, or by the condyle gliding over the articular eminence if near the end of mouth opening.
Reciprocal clicks are audible sounds during opening and closing of the mouth. ey usually indicate reduction of the anteriorly displaced disk during opening (louder opening click) and re-dislocation of the disk at the end of closing (softer clos­ing click). Timing of the clicking noise may also be of clinical interest; the expectation would be that an early opening click would be accompanied by a late closing click. Over time, the posterior structures may progressively become more elongat­ed with reduction of the disk over the condyle occurring later during mouth opening. erefore, with progression of the con­dition, the opening click may occur progressively later during mouth opening, and accordingly, the closing click will occur earlier during mouth closing. Individuals with ADDwoR do not have reciprocal clicks.
A clinical progression of the internal derangement of the TMJ has been described as starting with reciprocal clicks (ADDwR), then progressing to absent joint noise with limit­ed opening (ADDwoR) that is often described as a closed lock
43
joint, eventually leading to OA.
A single joint sound may be due to a variety of reasons, including the condyle touching the disk or articular surface during mouth opening or closing.
e physical therapist should educate the patient regarding the benign nature of some of the joint sounds. In many cases, the joint sounds and deviations of the jaw do not indicate sig­nicant pathology, and the goal of abolishing all joint sounds
29
is not realistic.
Often, proper neuromuscular re-education can control the joint sounds. In the case of an unstable disk where the patient demonstrates catching and deviation during mouth opening and closing, then the amount of controlled mouth opening (with tongue on the palate) should be limited within asymptomatic range and rhythmic stabilization exercises should
44
be emphasized.
Joint play and mobility
Joint play can be dened as movement (gliding, distrac­tion, rotation) of the joint surfaces that occurs as a result of an applied external force (therapist’s hands). Joint play of the TMJ can be performed in an inferior, medial, and lateral direction, as well as for anterior and posterior rotation. Normal joint play is crucial for maintaining a functional relationship between the TMJ and the occlusal structures (teeth) for eective chewing and speaking.
e rst step of mobility testing is to test joint play by gently depressing the mandible to “take up the slack.” e cli­nician places the thumb intraorally on top of the mandibular back molar and depresses gently in a caudal direction, distract­ing (gapping) the joint surfaces. e clinician can also maintain the hold for 6 to 7 seconds to achieve optimal release of the connective tissue. is preliminary step is necessary for all joint mobilization techniques, to avoid excessive stresses across the TMJ articular structures.
At this stage, a number of techniques can be completed. A long axis distraction is performed by applying an inferior force on the posterior mandibular molar along the axis of the ramus. Mobility of the TMJ can also be assessed for medial glide, lateral glide, anterior rotation, posterior rotation, and anterior transla­tion along the direction of the body of the mandible. e clas­sications of joint mobility are rated as normal, hypomobile, or hypermobile using the other side or clinical experience as refer­ence. e same techniques used to assess motion can be used as a mobilization treatment for a hypomobile joint.
Cotton roll test
is test is used to dierentiate between muscular and joint involvement. Biting down on an object with the back molars will result in gapping (unloading) the ipsilateral TMJ and com­pressing (loading) the contralateral TMJ. When a patient com­plains of pain on one side of the jaw, the clinician may have the patient bite down on a cotton roll with the back molars on the side of complaint. If pain increases, then the cause of symptoms may be muscular in origin due to the activation of the ipsilateral masticatory muscles. If pain decreases while biting down on the cotton roll, then the cause of the original pain may be joint re­lated (ie, disk or retrodiskal pad) because unloading the joint re­sults in a decrease in pain. is hypothesis of joint involvement can be further conrmed by asking the patient to bite down on the cotton roll with the back molars of the contralateral side. It should result in pain on the involved side due to loading of the joint on that side.
Upper quadrant
It has been suggested that the functional state of the stomatognathic system is closely related to the function of the
29
upper quadrant (ie, neck, shoulder, and upper back).
Patients with TMD have a higher prevalence of cervical spine symp­toms, and patients with cervical spine disorders also frequently
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
21
show signs and symptoms of TMD. erefore, evaluation of
https://t.me/med1917
the cervical spine, including a detailed assessment of the upper cervical spine, and rest of the upper quadrant is of vital impor-
29,45
tance in the management of TMD.
Information on how to perform a detailed assessment of this region is not included in this monograph.
Reex
Tapping the chin with a reex hammer will elicit a reex
response of the mandible if cranial nerve V (trigeminal nerve) is
46
If the reex is diminished or absent, it may be indica-
intact. tive of pathology of the trigeminal nerve.
Ultrasound imaging (ultrasonography)
Ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for TMD has been reported to be reliable in identifying internal derangement, condylar erosion, articular eusion, and degenerative OA.
47-51
Ultrasonography has many advantages over radiographs, MRI, and computed tomography (CT) scan as it is noninvasive and non-radioactive; it also has a relatively low cost as well as accept­able sensitivity and specicity.
52
While physical therapists usually rely on panoramic radio­graphs, MRI, or CT scan to provide medical diagnosis of a TMJ condition, the availability of ultrasonography may add a new dimension to the assessment and management of TMD. Ho
53
presented a case using ultrasound imaging to demon-
et al strate the positive eect of manual mobilization of the TMJ for a patient with the diagnosis of ankylosis (Figure 10). In addition, the authors described a standardized ultrasound im­aging approach to quantify anterior translation of the mandib­ular condyle during mouth opening (Figures 11 and 12). eir work further identied a linear model to describe the relation­ship between condylar anterior translation and mouth open-
54
ing ROM.
Ultrasound imaging also can be used as a tool to provide biofeedback in re-education for relaxation and balance of the masticatory musculature. Consistent with the increased interest in using ultrasound imaging for other parts of the body (eg, transversus abdominis, multidus, posterior tibialis mus­cles) ultrasonography can be a valuable adjunct for physical therapy assessment, management, and research for TMD.
Figure 10.
e Transverse Section of Ultrasono­graphic Imaging of the Right Temporomandibular Joint at Maximal Mouth Opening Position
A, pre-physical therapy. B, post-physical therapy im­ages. On each image, the dashed line represents the articular capsule and the solid line outlines the lat­eral surface of the mandibular condyle. e distance between the articular capsule and the lateral surface of the mandibular condyle (between the 2 yellow arrowheads) is dened as the lateral capsule-condyle distance. A 1.2 mm increase in lateral capsule condyle distance was noted after physical therapy interven­tion. Reprinted with permission from Ho KY, Ho S, Colletti PM.
53
Copyright 2016, JOSPT®, Inc.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Physical therapists should possess the knowledge to rec­ognize suspicious medical conditions that may cause orofacial pain. Medical screening should be used to rule out any red or yellow ags, and appropriate referrals made if indicated. More information about medical screening for TMJ can be found
55
elsewhere.
A physical therapy diagnosis can be hypothesized for treat­ment planning based on the information gathered through history taking and the examination and evaluation procedures described earlier. In many patients, the cause of TMD is mul­tifactorial; therefore, overlapping of diagnoses is not unusual.
Common diagnoses with their typical clinical signs and symp­toms are described below.
Articular Disorders
Disk-condyle incoordination-internal derangement
Internal derangement is dened as a localized mechanical fault in a synovial joint that interferes with its smooth action. ere are 2 kinds of internal derangement of the TMJ: (1) disk displacement with reduction and (2) disk displacement without reduction. In most cases, the disk is displaced anteromedially, and in rare conditions, a posteriorly displaced disk may occur.
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
22
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
56
Figure 11.
https://t.me/med1917
Measuring Anterior Translation of the
Mandibular Condyle During Mouth Opening
Ultrasound transducer placement for A, closed and B, open mouth positions. Reproduced with permission of the Society of Physical erapy Science.
54
Anterior disk displacement with reduction (ADDwR)
is condition is characterized by a noticeable opening click and a more subtle closing click. ese reciprocal joint noises (popping or clicking), with or without pain, indicate the reduction of the disk during mouth opening with the rst noise, and dislocation of the disk during mouth closing with the second noise. In addition to reciprocal joint sounds during opening and closing, limited opening with or without pain, and altered mandibular dynamic shown by a “C” curve or “S” curve during mouth opening, form a cluster of signs that may indicate an ADDwR.
Anterior disk displacement without reduction (ADDwoR)
e patient usually reports a history of reciprocal joint noises. At this stage, the patient no longer has joint noise, but may complain of limited mouth opening (less than 35 mm), ac­companied by ipsilateral deection of the jaw and pain during mouth opening. e limitation of mouth opening and deec­tion may progressively disappear as the condition becomes more chronic.
Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the gold stan­dard (95% accuracy) for diagnosing TMJ disk displacement; however, it is expensive. Julsvoll et al
57
recommended a cluster of clinical tests (positive in 5 of 7 tests) to be used to diagnose chronic ADDwoR that had 71% accuracy (sensitivity and spec­icity for 5 of 7 tests were 0.71 and 0.91; for 6 of 7 tests 0.43 and 0.91; and for 7 of 7 tests 0.29 and 0.95, respectively). e 7 tests are the joint provocation test (mouth opening with pain),
mouth opening), the laterotrusion test (limited lateral excur-
Figure 12.
Measuring Anterior Translation of the
Mandibular Condyle During Mouth Opening
e transverse section of ultrasound imaging of the temporomandibular joint at A, closed mouth and B, open mouth positions. Each oval represents the lat­eral aspect of the mandibular condyle. e anterior displacement distance was dened as the distance be­tween the centers of the ovals at the 2 positions. Re­produced with permission of the Society of Physical erapy Science.
54
sion, less than 9 mm, to the contralateral side), the joint mo­bility test (reduced anterior translation of the condylar head as assessed with palpation extraorally), the joint sound test (absent joint noise or crepitus is considered positive), the dental stick test (a tongue depressor is placed between the back molars for the patient to bite down on; pain elicited in either the ipsilateral or contralateral joint is considered positive while pain in the surrounding area is considered negative), and the isometric test (manual isometric resistance to lateral excursion contralaterally, with the test considered positive if pain is elicited). Clinician may use this validated method to help determine if ADDwoR is present and for proper intervention before determining if MRI
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
23
is indicated. Ultrasound imaging as discussed in the previous
https://t.me/med1917
section can be added as a new diagnostic tool for physical ther­apists.
surgical procedures, capsular tightness, structural disorders of the joint (such as ankylosis), internal derangement, or advanced
60
OA.
Posterior disk displacement
is condition, referred to as “open lock,” is characterized
by the inability to close the mouth due to the posterior dis­placement of the disk. is condition is rare, but it can occur after prolonged opening of the mouth for dental procedures or after excessive yawning or laughing. ere are usually no joint sounds and the patient may or may not experience pain. A de­nitive diagnosis of posterior disk displacement needs to be conrmed by MRI. Non-surgical interventions, similar to those used for anterior disk displacements, are also the rst option for this condition.
58
According to Katzberg et al,
33% of their 76 volunteers with disk displacement were asymptomatic. Some researchers believe that the disk has remodeling properties leading to repair or the development of a “pseudo” disk.
Fracture
Condylar fracture caused by trauma may aect the artic­ular surfaces, ligaments, disk, and muscles of mastication. Its sequelae could include synovitis, capsulitis, ankylosis, or OA.
59
Capsular involvement
Signs of capsular tightness include any or a combination of the following: palpable tenderness over the lateral capsule of the TMJ, pain with opening, limited opening with deection to the ipsilateral side, limited lateral excursion to the contralateral side, and deection towards the ipsilateral side during protrusion.
30
Ankylosis
Ankylosis of the TMJ is characterized by restricted joint play mobility and mandibular ROM for mouth opening, pro­trusion, and contralateral lateral excursion (if unilateral). e restriction is usually manifested by limited anterior condylar translation of the involved side; therefore, deection of the mandible to the ipsilateral side is also observed during mouth opening and protrusion. Bony ankylosis is characterized by zero mobility of the TMJ; whereas, capsular and brous ankylosis would show some mobility even though hypomobile. Ankylo­sis can be the result of joint inammation from trauma (likely unilateral) or a systemic condition such as a polyarthritic disease (potentially bilateral).
59
Hypomobility
Hypomobility of the TMJ is demonstrated by a decrease in jaw opening or limited accessory joint play movement during mobility testing, with or without pain. An opening range of less than 30 mm is usually considered hypomobility. Temporoman­dibular joint hypomobility can be caused by masticatory muscle disorders, brous adhesion after trauma (such as fracture) or
Hypermobility
Hypermobility of the TMJ is dened as the condylar head translating beyond the articular eminence, onto the articular tubercle. e joint functions outside the physiological range yet still stays within its anatomical range. Temporomandibular joint hypermobility can be caused by joint laxity, systemic hy­permobility, anatomical variance, dystonia of the masticatory
30
muscles, or simply lack of control of motion.
Clinically, bilateral hypermobility is identied based on excessive jaw opening (greater than 55 mm), often along with poor movement control as demonstrated by an aberrant “S” curve movement pattern of the mandible during mouth open­ing. Protrusion of the lateral pole of the condylar heads will also be noted; this indicates subluxation caused by excessive ante­rior translation of the condyles. Unilateral hypermobility will demonstrate deection of the jaw to the contralateral side at the end of opening and protrusion and excessive lateral excursion to the contralateral side.
Dislocation of condyle
Dislocation occurs when the condylar head is displaced beyond the articular tubercle, out of the mandibular fossa, and is unable to return to its physiological position. e mouth is kept in an open position. Dislocation may be caused by acute trauma, neurogenic muscular hyperactivity, connective tissue disorder such as Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or systemic hyper­mobility. Bilateral dislocation of the condyles will exhibit ex­cessive opening with no deection, in contrast to a unilateral dislocation that will result in deection of the mandible to the contralateral side.
Subluxation of condyle
Subluxation is dened as a temporary dislocation that can be self-reduced. Its cause can be joint laxity or systemic hyper-
59
mobility.
Excessive anterior translation of the condyle in this condition is usually noted by observation or palpation of the protruded lateral pole during mouth opening.
30
Masticatory Muscle Disorders
Myogenous TMD can be caused by direct or indirect mac­rotrauma to the TMJ (eg, a blow to the jaw or a whiplash in­jury) or repetitive microtrauma from nocturnal clenching and bruxing. Forward head posture may also contribute to mastica­tory muscle disorders due to the alteration of proper alignment. Psychosocial factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, avoid­ance of activities, secondary gain behavior, etc, may also play a signicant role in precipitating or perpetuating the symptoms of myogenous TMD.
60
24
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Myofascial pain disorder syndrome
https://t.me/med1917
Myofascial pain disorder syndrome is dened by pain that originates from the myofascial structures. Myofascial pain dis­order syndrome is often aected by stress. Its clinical manifes­tation includes multiple complaints of facial pain, jaw pain, headaches, joint noises, limited opening, tinnitus, earache, dizziness, swallowing diculty, and speech disturbance. It is characterized by trigger points in the aected muscles. Trig­ger points are exquisite tender points that are present in a taut
61
band of the muscle and can refer pain to a remote area. points can be active or latent. Travell and Simons
Trigger
61
studied the nature and referring patterns of trigger points and found that trigger points in the temporalis muscle can refer pain to the maxillary teeth and those in the masseter muscle can refer pain to the maxillary and mandibular teeth. erefore, an accurate diagnosis must dierentiate the cause of a toothache before any irreversible procedure (eg, tooth extraction) is performed on a patient. Myofascial pain is the most prevalent cause/form of TMD. It may occur with or without TMJ involvement. e diagnosis of MPDS can be made by palpation of trigger points, patient symptoms, and the relief of symptoms with the spray and stretch technique.
Trismus
An acute closed lock of the jaw after a dental procedure is referred to as trismus. is is caused by spasm of the masse­ter muscle after prolonged jaw opening and results in limited mandibular ROM. Clinical symptoms and signs include: histo­ry, limited opening range (<25 mm), and palpable tenderness/ tightness over the masseter muscle belly.
Myositis
Myositis is an acute inammation of a muscle. Its clini­cal manifestation in TMD includes palpable tenderness, pain during ROM, and limited opening of the jaw. e cause of my­ositis may be overuse soreness, trauma, or local infection.
Myospasm
Spasm of the masticatory muscles can be caused by over­stretching of the jaw, such as in the case of trismus (spasm of the masseter muscle) resulting from a dental procedure. Myospasm can also be caused by overuse of the masticatory muscles, such as excessive chewing on gum or hard food.
Dystonia
Dystonia is a neurological condition with central nervous system (CNS) origin (such as in the case of Parkinson’s disease) in which the patient is unable to voluntarily control movement of the jaw, lips, and tongue, in which case the functions of chewing, swallowing, and speech are often aected. Medication and Botox injection may be benecial in controlling the related symptoms.
Myobrotic contracture
Myobrotic contracture is a chronic condition that is the result of shortening of the masticatory muscles. It may be caused by trauma, prolonged hypomobility, or infection.
Neoplasia
Neoplasia is dened as an abnormal growth of muscle tis­sue; it can be malignant or benign. Neoplasia may or may not be associated with pain. An example of neoplasia of the masti­catory muscle is myxoma.
59
Arthritides
Arthritides is dened as inammation of a joint. Arthriti­des of the TMJ can be categorized as OA, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, capsulitis, or synovitis. A brief description of the dierent types of TMJ arthritides is provided below.
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis of the TMJ can be caused by degeneration or excessive wear and tear of the joint (eg, due to bruxism). Crep­itus joint noises during opening and closing, pain with ROM, and limited opening are some of the clinical signs of TMJ OA.
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis of the TMJ is the result of a systemic disease. Control of inammation and joint protection are keys to management.
Psoriatic arthritis
Psoriatic arthritis is a syndrome in which psoriasis occurs in association with inammatory arthritis. e management of psoriatic arthritis is similar to the management of rheumatoid arthritis.
Capsulitis
Capsulitis may be caused by trauma or poor oral habits. Over-stretching of the capsule results in an inammatory pro­cess. It is characterized by pain upon palpation, pain with jaw movement, and an altered opening pattern of the mouth. It usually shows a “C” curve in opening with deection towards the aected side with mouth opening and protrusion.
30
Synovitis
Synovitis is the inammation of a synovial membrane that lines a joint. It is dicult to dierentiate clinically from capsu-
30,56
litis.
Associated Conditions
Neurovascular abnormality may cause symptoms in the orofacial and TMJ area. Careful consideration to dierentiate the cause of each pathology and understand the connection between TMD and dierent symptoms can provide clinicians with the correct path of management. A brief description of each associated condition will follow.
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. © 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
25
Headaches
https://t.me/med1917
e relationship between TMD and headaches has long
62-65
been reported and studied. tional investigation of 1230 individuals, Goncalves et al
In a population-based, cross-sec-
63
found that TMD symptoms were more commonly reported by pa­tients with migraine headache, episodical tension-type head­ache, or chronic daily headache than by individuals without headache. Some studies have suggested that TMD is a risk fac­tor for increased headache frequency and chronic migraine. Bruxism may be one cause of an increase in headaches.
69
cause bruxism is related to a person’s stress level,
as is chron-
ic headache, the connection seems logical. Magnusson et al
67,68
66
Be-
70
reported an increase in the prevalence of bruxism in young in-
71
dividuals during 1983 to 2003. Anastassaki Kohler et al
also reported an increase in the prevalence of recurrent headaches in 20-year-old individuals over a 20-year period (1983 to 2003). e stress level seen in our current society is thought to be the reason for the increase in frequency of TMD and headaches.
Many types of headaches can be related to TMD. While a detailed description of the causes and symptoms of each type of headache is beyond the scope of this monograph, we will briey discuss the most important related symptoms below:
Migraine headache: Even though this is a vascular type of headache, it often has a tension component. Myofascial trig-
72
ger points are prevalent in migraine headaches.
Increased tension in the musculature of the cervical spine and TMJ may trigger migraine headaches. Tension-type headache: Tension-type headache is the most
• prevalent primary headache disorder. Tenderness in the peric­ranial tissue is associated with the intensity and frequency of tension-type headache. Increased tension in the TMJ muscu­lature and a forward head posture may exert pressure on the trigeminal nerve and greater occipital nerve, which in turn results in tension-type headaches in the cranio-facial area.
Cervicogenic headache: Unilateral cephalic radiating head­ache usually is caused by an upper cervical spine disorder. Patients with TMD often demonstrate compromised cervical spine alignment, such as a loss of cervical lordosis. erefore, the incidence of cervicogenic headaches is high in individuals with TMD.
73
Ear symptoms
ere has been an increasing awareness of ear symptoms related to TMD in recent years. When a patient complains of tinnitus, earache, or ear fullness, without true otological cause, the TMJ and cervical spine are areas to be considered. Conr­mation of the diagnosis is often based on the patient’s ear symp­toms being relieved by treatment to the cervical spine and TMJ.
Patients with TMD often complain of ear symptoms such
74,75
as tinnitus, earaches, and stuness or congestion.
76
Toledo et al,
in their systematic review and meta-analysis,
Porto De
found a high prevalence of fullness (74.8%), otalgia (ear pain,
55.1%), tinnitus (52.1%), vertigo (40.8%), and hearing loss (38.9%) in patients with TMD. In a prospective, observation-
77
al study, Maciel et al
reported that the number of otological symptoms was considerably higher in patients with moderate and severe TMD.
e association between ear symptoms and the TMJ is complicated and multifactorial. e so called “non-otologi­cal tinnitus” also named “somatic tinnitus” can be elicited by dysfunction of the cervical spine or the TMJ. e connection among these structures is probably through the trigeminocervi-
78
cal nucleus and the auriculotemporal nerve. vical nucleus is a neuron pool in the basal ganglion where infor-
e trigeminocer-
mation congregates from cranial nerves V, VII, IX, X, XI, and
79,80
cervical nerves 1, 2, and 3.
Due to the proximity of these neurons, dysfunction of the cervical spine will inevitably aect cranial nerve V (trigeminal nerve) that innervates the TMJ. e auriculotemporal nerve, which is a branch of the third division of the trigeminal nerve, innervates the lateral surface of the su­perior auricle, the external auditory meatus, and the tympanic membrane. erefore, ear symptoms may occur as the result of TMD and cervical spine dysfunction. Additionally, Travell
61
and Simons
described that dysfunction of the lateral ptery­goid muscle can interfere with the eustachian tube, also causing non-neurological tinnitus.
Clinically, it is often noted that treating the TMJ and cer­vical spine results in relieving the patient’s ear symptoms in­cluding earache, stuness, and tinnitus. It is postulated that relieving upper cervical spine (C1, C2, C3) and TMJ symptoms normalizes ear stimuli, causing a decrease in ear symptoms.
81,82
Vertigo/dizziness
e connection between the cervical spine and symptoms of vertigo or dizziness is well-documented. Vertigo often is men­tioned in the literature as one of the otologic symptoms that is
83
related to TMD. Chole et al
reported that vertigo symptoms
were signicantly more prevalent in the TMD population.
84
Marchiori et al,
based on their cross-sectional study, found
a signicant association between TMD and vertigo in older
85
adults. Zeigelboim et al
provide the following hypotheses for the relationship between TMD and otologic symptoms: (1) a close anatomic and structural connection, (2) a mechanical transmission of force from the TMJ to the middle ear through the discomalleolar ligament, (3) possible direct irritation of the auriculotemporal nerve (a branch of the trigeminal nerve that innervates the tympanic membrane), and (4) the convergence of information at the trigeminocervical nuclei, which includes information from cranial nerves V, VII, IX, X, XI and cervical nerves 1, 2, and 3.
Patients with TMD usually demonstrate a forward head posture and have cervical spine dysfunction. It is speculated that suboccipital tightness caused by a forward head posture can compress the greater occipital nerve and compromise verte­brobasilar blood ow, resulting in vertigo/dizziness. In addition,
26
Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA.
© 2021 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical erapy, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission.