Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3594_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
35 • South Africa 395
https://t.me/medicina_free
presented in hypovolemic shock, Nair et al. showed that ligation is an acceptable form of treatment in the presence of hemodynamic instability.
16
TRANSMEDIASTINAL OR TRANSABDOMINAL TORSO INJURIES
Most patients with intrathoracic or intraabdominal aortic injury usually die before they reach the hospital. Where pos­sible, endovascular stenting has become the treatment of choice. With trans-torso gunshot wounds, there is a much higher incidence of associated injuries (e.g., the esophagus).
Blunt thoracic aortic dissection is generally diagnosed based on the CT scan rather than on angiography; the causes are like those in other countries. The treatment is generally regarded as similar, as well, and endovascular stenting as the treatment of choice.
CARDIAC INJURIES
Most penetrating cardiac injuries do not survive to reach the hospital; however, of those that do, most have a good out-
17,18
come.
Most South African residents will have completed several emergency room thoracotomies (ERTs) with both anterolateral and sternotomy approaches before completion of their residencies. The repair techniques are similar to those practiced elsewhere. An interesting challenge is the patient who presents with a second stab wound to the heart, having had a previous injury repaired on another occasion. A differ­ent approach is often required, especially if there has been a previous sternotomy with repair or closure performed using steel wires!
Strategies to Sustain and to Train the Next Generation of Trauma Surgeons
Medical training in South Africa is normally 5 to 6 years, followed by a 2-year internship period and a further year doing compulsory community medical service, usually in a rural or community hospital. This is performed before any approved specialty training program.
General surgical training (which includes at least 3 to 6 months of specic critical care training) consists of a 5-year training period similar to that in many Western coun­tries, and it is possible to do a further 2-year subspecialty fellowship in vascular surgery or trauma surgery, including trauma critical care, and completion of the relevant fellow­ship, resulting in an independent subspecialist qualication.
As part of their general surgical training, most general surgical trainees will spend at least 1 year out of their 5 years dealing primarily with trauma cases from within a dedi­cated trauma center. Acute care surgery as practiced in the United States does not exist in South Africa, as all acute sur­gery cases are dealt with by the same trainees and surgeons who would deal with the general surgery and trauma emer­gencies, in addition to their time spent in dedicated burns, trauma, or intensive care settings. Many specialist centers, especially those associated with an academic institution, will
have a separate emergency vascular service. The volume of both acute care surgical cases and trauma cases that require operative intervention is high enough that surgical skills are retained. However, the lack of supervision at some level II Centers means that surgical decision-making skills are sometimes absent. The success of the DSTC course in a high­volume environment may reect this.
Both trauma and emergency medicine are young special­ties with an enthusiastic following, and those going into trauma as a career will practice critical care as well. None­theless, most vascular trauma will continue to be dealt with by general surgeons as part of their greater practice, and at least in South Africa, most of such procedures, especially outside of the major academic and private centers, will be open in nature, rather than endovascular.
References
1. Plani F. Vascular trauma. In: Nicol A, Steyn E, eds. Oxford Handbook
of Trauma for Southern Africa. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
2010:258–272.
2. Veller MG, Pillai J. Vascular injuries. In: Adeloye A, Adekunle OO,
Awojobi A, eds. Davey’s Companion to Surgery in Africa. 3rd ed. Uruwa: Acecool Medical Publishers Nigeria; 2009:33–40.
3. Degiannis E, Levy RD, Soanos C, Florizoone MG, Saadia R. Arte-
rial gunshot injuries of the extremities: a South African experience. J Trauma. 1995;39(3):570–575.
4. Franklin J, Hatzitheophilou C, Pantanowitz D. Vascular trauma. In:
Pantanowitz D, ed. Modern Surgery in Africa: the Baragwanath Experi- ence. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers; 1988.
5. Bowley DM, Degiannis E, Goosen J, Boffard KD. Penetrating vas-
cular trauma in Johannesburg, South Africa. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82(1):221–235.
6. Boffard KD, ed. Manual of Denitive Surgical Trauma Care (DSTC). 5th
ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.
7. Brenner M, Bulger EM, Perina DG, etal. Joint statement from the Amer-
ican College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) regarding the clin­ical use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018;13(3(1)):e000154.
https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000154.
8. Navsaria P, Thoma M, Nicol A. Foley catheter balloon tamponade for
life threatening haemorrhage in penetrating neck trauma. World Jour- nal of Surg. 2008;32(12):2716–2723.
9. MacFarlane C, Boffard KD, Saadia R, Wilkinson AE. Emergency room
arteriography: a useful technique in the assessment of peripheral vas­cular injuries. J Roy Col Surg Edin. 1989;34(6):310–313.
10. Boffard KD, Goosen J, Plani F, Degiannis E, Potgieter H. The use of
low dosage x-ray (Lodox/Statscan) in major trauma: comparison between low dose x-ray and conventional x-ray techniques. J Trauma. 2006;60(6):1175–1178.
11. Veller MG, Le Roux D. Carotid, jugular and vertebral blood vessel inju-
ries. In: Velmahos GC, Degiannis E, Doll D, eds. Penetrating Trauma. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2016:229–238.
12. Demetriades D, Stewart M. Penetrating injuries of the neck. Ann R Coll
Surg Engl. 1985;67(2):71–74.
13. Robbs JV, Baker LW, Human RR, Vawda IS, Duncan H, Rajaruthnam P.
Cervico-mediastinal arterial injuries. Arch Surg. 1981;116(5):663–668.
14. Du Toit DF. Penetrating trauma to the subclavian vessels. In: Velmahos
GC, Degiannis E, Doll D, eds. Penetrating Trauma. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2016:229–238.
15. Robbs J, Baker LW. Subclavian and axillary artery injury. S Afr Med J.
1977;19(51(8)):227–231.
16. Nair R, Robbs JV, Muckart DJ. Management of penetrating cervico-
mediastinal venous trauma. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000;19(1): 65–69.
17. Robbs J, Baker LW. Cardiovascular trauma. Curr Probl Surg.
1984;21(4):1–87.
18. Degiannis E, Loogna P, Doll D, Bonanno F, Bowley DM, Smith MD. Pen-
etrating cardiac injuries: recent experience in South Africa. World J Surg. 2006;30(7):1258–1264.
36
https://t.me/medicina_free
Colombia: Don’t Dread the Popliteal and Axillary Fossa
CARLOS A. ORDOÑEZ and MICHAEL W. PARRA
According to the World Health Organization, traumatic injuries worldwide are responsible for over 5 million deaths annually.1 As an integral part of this epidemic, Latin America has one of the highest homicide rates.2 The region has just 8% of the world’s population, but accounts for 33% of the total number of murders with a bafing rate of 21.5 per 100,000 inhabitants compared to the average of 7 per 100,000 inhabitants worldwide.2 Interpersonal violence among young people is the leading cause of death in countries like Colombia, which unfortu­nately nds itself among the top 50 most violent countries on earth. Adding insult to injury, most of this violence resides among the poor, whose access to adequate health care is scarce to none.
Trauma centers from Cali, Colombia, have vast expe­rience in penetrating and blunt vascular trauma and in a published retrospective cohort study, a total of 175 patients with popliteal artery injuries were reviewed. Of these injuries, the most frequent arterial procedure was interposition grafting in 116 (66.3%) patients; vein grafts were used in 105 and synthetic grafts in 11. Direct anas­tomosis was performed in 34 (19.4%) patients. Popliteal venous injuries were reported in 102 patients (58.3%) and 46 (26.3%) required ligation of the vessel, venor­rhaphy in 38 (21.7%), direct anastomosis in 7 (4%), and interposition grafting with vein grafts in 2 (1.1%). Finally, only 4 (1.5%) patients required amputation and the over­all mortality was 9.6% (n = 19).4 As a result of this vast operative experience, we have developed a couple of useful surgical pearls.
3
Don’t Dread the Fossa: The Posterior Popliteal Artery Approach
A 23-year-old male victim arrives at our level I trauma center hemodynamically stable with a gunshot wound to the right knee area (Fig. 36.1) with associated pain, swelling, and decreased distal pulses on palpation. Plain x-rays reveal no associated extremity fracture and the patient’s vital signs remain stable. A computed tomog­raphy (CT) angiogram of the extremity is done which reveals a mid-popliteal artery injury without contrast extravasation and without reconstitution of distal flow. It is our belief that a preoperative CT angiogram of the involved extremity is paramount to determine the exact location and extent of injury in hemodynamically stable patients. Cases in which patients present with hemody­namically unstable and/or active arterial bleeding should be taken immediately to the operating room where an on­table traditional angiogram can be performed. Once the popliteal artery injury has been clearly identified, then it is our recommendation that the ideal surgical approach
396
for open surgical repair is via the posterior approach because:
1. Of the ease of repair of any portion of the popliteal artery
2. It avoids muscle splitting incisions
3. It requires minimal dissection to identify and achieve proximal and distal control of the vessel
The posterior approach originally described by Dr. Rudolph Matas in 1921 for the management of traumatic arteriove­nous aneurysms of the popliteal vessels entailed a vertical incision via the fossa.5 Dr. Shumacker in 1946, following his vast experience managing hundreds of American com­bat casualties from World War II, described in detail sev­eral nonvertical incisions to the popliteal fossa that avoided the often seen heavy scars and joint contractures with the Matas incision.6 Currently, the posterior approach requires that the trauma/vascular and/or general surgeon perform prophylactic and/or therapeutic four compartment fas­ciotomies to the lower leg and harvest the greater saphe­nous vein from the contralateral leg prior to positioning the patient in the prone position.7 It is our recommenda­tion that fasciotomies be performed in all cases of popliteal artery injuries because the morbidity of the incisions are signicantly less than the potential morbidity of a missed or delayed extremity compartment syndrome. Upon comple­tion, a negative pressure dressing is placed on the recently created fasciotomy wounds and a proximal longitudinal incision over the contralateral groin/thigh area is done to harvest a considerable segment of the proximal greater saphenous vein (minimum of 5 cm). Then the patient is ipped and positioned in the prone position with appro­priate padding and airway protection. The injured limb is then re-prepped and draped. The popliteal fossa skin inci­sion is preformed vertically in an “S” like fashion with the purpose of avoiding postoperative scar retraction that could potentially limit the range of motion of the involved knee (Fig. 36.2). After performing the skin incision, the rest of the subcutaneous dissection should be directed midline and the popliteal vascular/nervous bundle is located very shallow to the skin incision (Fig. 36.3). The complete extent of the popliteal artery can be exposed with ease and both proximal and distal vessel control can be achieved similarly without the need to split any muscles (Fig. 36.4). At this point, the surgical repair of the popliteal artery depends more on the extent of the injury and can include anything from simple direct repair to patching with autologous or synthetic mate­rial to segmental replacement similarly with autologous or synthetic material (Fig. 36.5). We usually end up perform­ing a reverse saphenous interposition graft for most injuries with prior formal Fogarty (3 Fr) catheter embolectomies of both proximal and distal ends (Fig. 36.6). We also routinely systemically heparinize our patients and locally infuse
36 • Colombia: Don’t Dread the Popliteal and Axillary Fossa 397
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 36.4 Popliteal artery is exposed.
Fig. 36.1 (A) Entry wound. (B) Exit wound.
Fig. 36.2 The popliteal fossa skin incision is preformed vertically in an
“S” like fashion.
Fig. 36.5 Closer view of the popliteal artery injury.
Fig. 36.3 After performing the skin incision, the rest of the subcutane-
ous dissection should be directed midline.
Fig. 36.6 Fogarty catheter embolectomy of the popliteal artery.
heparinized ush prior to completing our graft anastomo­sis (Fig. 36.7). Upon completion, an on-table angiography is recommended to verify adequate distal ow. If there is an associated popliteal vein injury, we recommend primary vessel suture repair in most cases. If primary vein repair is not feasible, then the vein can be ligated. Vein interposition
398 SECTION 5 Global Perspectives on Vascular Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 36.8 Closed incision.
Fig. 36.7 (A, B) Interposition vein graft.
grafts to x the popliteal vein notoriously fail and are so not indicated. Finally, the incision is closed by layers (Fig. 36.8). Patient is transferred postoperatively to a monitored nurs­ing oor where serial vascular checks can be performed. Fasciotomy wounds are closed or reapproximated as soon as possible and physical therapy initiated early in the recovery and carried out as an outpatient.
The popliteal artery anteromedial approach with associ­ated fasciotomies is the most widely used technique in the world by vascular and trauma surgeons alike, and is the most cited and described technique in the medical literature that addresses the management of these injuries. Originally described by Dr. Szilagyi in 1959, it requires a medial inci­sion over the thigh and leg and requires extensive muscle splitting dissection to reach the vessel for both proximal and distal control.8 This dissection is time consuming and tedious, and the vessel distally is deeper and harder to access and control.9 Regarding long-term outcomes, the literature does not report any signicant difference regarding patency and subsequent amputation rates.10 But we, the authors, have been able to demonstrate a signicant reduction (more than 50%) in total operative time. It is our belief and prac­tice that all surgeons who are currently involved in the care of trauma patients should “embrace the fossa” and include the posterior approach as a key component to their arma­mentarium when confronting a patient with a potential popliteal vessel injury.
Don’t Dread the Fossa: The Axillary Artery Approach
A 27-year-old male patient arrives at our level I trauma center hemodynamically unstable, pale, and diaphoretic with a blood pressure of 90/60 mm Hg, a heart rate of 115 bpm and a gunshot wound to the right shoulder. The insti­tution’s massive transfusion protocol is activated and the patient undergoes rapid sequence intubation by anesthe­sia staff. On secondary survey, a gunshot wound is seen at the level of the right infraclavicular area with the anterior axillary line. Active arterial bleeding ensued profusely from the gunshot wound orice, which was managed initially by the application of direct pressure. Patient responds well to our initial resuscitation efforts in the trauma bay and is taken immediately to the CT suite for a CT chest with right upper extremity run-off. A proximal right axillary artery injury with active extravasation is identied and the patient is taken immediately to the operating room for surgical repair.11 The traditional surgical incision is one that starts at the infraclavicular area and extends over the delto-pectoral fossa and ends, if needed, over the medial aspect of the upper arm. This incision requires usually the transection of both the pectoralis major and minor muscle bundles to expose and achieve proximal vascular control.12 This approach is time consuming, technically difcult, and morbid for the patient.13 Because of this, and considering the experiences obtained in elective cases of axillary lymph node dissections for breast cancer, we have adapted a simi­lar technique to better deal with these complex trauma cases. The patient is placed in the supine position with the injured upper extremity hand alongside the patient’s fore­head (modied military salute pose) (Fig. 36.9). The inci­sion is drawn along the axilla fossa in a slightly inverted “S” fashion. The purpose of the shape of the incision is to avoid subsequent scar retraction which may compromise
36 • Colombia: Don’t Dread the Popliteal and Axillary Fossa 399
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 36.11 Ligated axillary vein and resected ends of the axillary artery.
Fig. 36.9 Patient placed in modified military salute pose. The incision is
drawn along the axilla fossa in a slightly inverted “S” fashion.
Fig. 36.10 Incision site showing axillary artery and bullet hole.
the long-term mobility and range of motion of the shoul­der. Both proximal and distal vascular control of the axil­lary artery can be performed quickly and safely through this incision, without the need of transecting any mayor muscle groups (Fig. 36.10). The proximal dissection of the artery can be extended all the way to the ipsilateral rib cage and control can be obtained of the vessel as it emerges from the chest. At this point the surgical repair
Fig. 36.12 Interposition synthetic graft.
of the axillary artery depends more on the extent of the injury and can include anything from simple direct repair to patching with autologous or synthetic material to seg­mental replacement similarly with autologous or synthetic material (Figs. 36.11 and 36.12). We usually end up per­forming a reverse saphenous interposition graft for most injuries with prior formal Fogarty (3-Fr) catheter embolec­tomies of both proximal and distal ends. We strongly rec­ommend performing the proximal anastomosis rst when an interposition graft option has been decided, prior to any proximal manipulation or embolectomy of the vessel, to avoid the risk of losing the proximal end of the native ves­sel due to its potential to retract back into the chest. We also routinely systemically heparinize our patients and locally infuse heparinized ush prior to completing our
400 SECTION 5 Global Perspectives on Vascular Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 36.13 Closed incision.
distal graft anastomosis. Upon completion, an on-table angiography is recommended to verify adequate distal ow. If there is an associated axillary vein injury, we rec­ommend primary vessel suture repair in most cases. If pri­mary vein repair is not feasible, then the vein can be ligated (see Fig. 36.11). Vein interposition grafts to x the axillary vein notoriously fail and so are not indicated. Finally, the incision is closed by layers (Fig. 36.13). The need for fas­ciotomies of the upper extremity is considered in a case­by-case scenario, always defaulting towards performing them if there is any question of possible ensuing compart­ment syndrome or hypertension. The patient is transferred postoperatively to a monitored nursing oor where serial vascular checks can be performed. Fasciotomy wounds are closed or reapproximated as soon as possible and physi­cal/occupational therapy initiated early in the recovery and carried out as an outpatient. Once again, it is our
belief and practice that all surgeons who are currently involved in the care of trauma patients should “embrace the fossa” and include the axillary fossa approach as a key component to their armamentarium when confronting a patient with a potential axillary vessel injury. We want to emphasize that the original Matas operation performed more than 100 years ago (1888) has stood the test of time and we, the authors, have adapted its modied version by Elkin and applied it not only to manage complex traumatic injuries of the popliteal vessels, but also to those complex injuries of the upper extremity: the Cali Approach to the Axillary Vessels.
14,15
References
1. World Health Organization. Injuries and violence: the facts 2014. WHO. World Health Organization; 2015. https://www.who.int/
violence_injury_prevention/media/news/2015/Injury_violence_ facts_2014/en.
2. Muggah R, Aguirre Tobón K. Citizen Security in Latin America: Facts and Figures. 2017. https://igarape.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2018/
04/Citizen-Security-in-Latin-America-Facts-and-Figures.pdf.
3. Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses. Forensis 2017: Datos para la Vida. Colombia. 2018;19(1). https://www.medicina-
legal.gov.co/documents/20143/262076/Forensis+2017+Interactivo. pdf/0a09fedb-f5e8-11f8-71ed-2d3b475e9b82.
4. Garcia AF, Sanchez AI, Millan M, et al. Limb amputation among
patients with surgically treated popliteal artery injury: analysis of 15 years of experience in an urban trauma center in Cali. Colombia. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38:281–293.
5. Matas R. Military Surgery of the Vascular System. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders; 1921.
6. Shumacker Jr. HB. Incisions in surgery of aneur ysms: with special ref-
erence to explorations in antecubital and popliteal fossae. Ann Surg. 1946;124:586–598.
7. Hamza N, Marath A, Al-Fakhry MR. The management of aneurysms
and arterio-venous stulae of the popliteal artery arising from war trauma. Emphasis on sigmoid operative approach. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1990;31(4):457–461.
8. Szilagyi DE, Whitcomb JG, Smith RF. Anteromedial approach to
the popliteal artery for femoropopliteal artery grafting. Arch Surg. 1959;78:647.
9. Sciarretta JD, Macedo FI, Otero CA, Figueroa JN, Pizano LR, Namias
N. Management of traumatic popliteal vascular injuries in a level I trauma center: a 6-year experience. Int J Surg. 2015;18:136–141.
10. Fairhurst PG, Wyss TR, Weiss S, Becker D, Schmidli J, Makaloski V.
Popliteal vessel trauma: surgical approaches and the vessel-rst strat­egy. Knee. 2018;25(5):849–855.
11. Graham JM, Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, DeBakey ME. Vascular injuries
of the axilla. Ann Surg. 1982;195:232–238.
12. Padegimas EM, Ramsey ML, Austin M, et al. Evaluation and man-
agement of axillary artery injury: the orthopaedic and vascular sur­geon’s perspective. Orthopedics. 2017;40(4):223–229.
13. Mazzini FN, Vu T, Prichayudh S, etal. Operative exposure and manage-
ment of axillary vessel injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;37(5):451.
14. Elkin DC. Traumatic aneurysm; Matas operation - 57 years after. Surg
Gynecol Obstet. 1946;82:1–12.
15. Matas R. Traumatic aneurysm of the left brachial artery—incision
and partial excision of sac: recover y. Phil Med News. 1888;53:462–466.
37
https://t.me/medicina_free
Brazil
ROSSI MURILO and RINA PORTA
Introduction
For the purposes of this chapter, vascular trauma is consid­ered in the following anatomic distributions, each of which has differing diagnostic and management considerations: (1) cervical or carotid, (2) axillo-subclavian, (3) thoracic, (4) abdominal, and (5) extremity domains. Whereas the major­ity of vascular injury is managed via an open operative approach, the use of endovascular techniques is common in the metropolitan centers throughout the country. In these instances, stent grafts are often used to treat or “seal” vascu­lar disruption in anatomically-challenging-to-reach vessels such as those in the thorax and thoracic outlet. In Brazil, challenges exist as to the “best training paradigms” to pre­pare trauma and vascular surgeons. However, a number of Brazilian medical centers and emergency medical systems, working alongside the efforts of professional societies such as the Brazilian Trauma Society (Sociedade Brasileira de Atendimento Integrado ao Politraumatizado, SBAIT), have emphasized the importance of trauma care in the country.
Epidemiology
Currently, urban violence, automobile crashes, and work­related accidents are responsible for most injuries in Brazil; a notable amount of those injuries are to major vascular structures. saving interventions and early resuscitation strategies have been established in many of the larger emergency rooms in Brazil. Additionally, a full understanding of the epidemiology of vascular trauma is hampered by the lack of standardized data retrieval and archiving mechanisms or databases.
According to Brazil’s Institute of Geography and Statis­tics, just over 210 million people live in Brazil. Increasing levels of violence and trauma within certain urban areas and regional locations in Brazil (Table 37.1) were the norm until the most recent decade (2010–19). This trend has lessened recently as rates of violent crime, including homi­cide, have plateaued or declined in proportion to population growth. Currently, the overall homicide rate uctuates at around 30 per 100,000 people.
The growth in homicide over these three and a half decades was largely due to death from rearms, whereas deaths from other means remained relatively constant. In the early 1980s, there was an “arms race” associated with an increase in social tension, caused by a massive growth in urban population (following population transition from rural areas), although the 2003 Disarmament Statute helped to limit rearm availability.
We have two types of health care systems in Brazil: public (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS) and private (health and private plans). About 90% of the Brazilian popula tion
1–3
Concomitant with this experience, better life-
1–3
1–3
rely on the public health system that is maintained by the government. The health system is composed of facili­ties of varying complexity: basic health units and Emer­gency Care Units, secondary hospitals, tertiary hos pitals and University Hospitals, where some tertiary and uni­versity hospitals correspond and function as trauma centers (Fig. 37.1). Systematized, standardized clinical responses to polytraumatized patients began in the pub­lic (University) hospitals in the 1980s, with the introduc­tion and expansion of Advanced Trauma Life Support in Brazil. In the last decade, some private hospitals have started to implement trauma care systems based around teams of trauma surgeons. Prehospital emergency care is performed by the Emergency Medical Care Service (Ser­viço de Atendimento Móvel de Urgência, SAMU), which is structured with basic care units composed of techni­cians and nurses and advanced units composed of doctors and nurses. An emergency medical response (ambulância) is obtained by telephoning 192. However, in some cities such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Curitiba, in addi­tion to the SAMU response, prehospital trauma care is per­formed by physicians and nurses in conjunction with the rescue team of the Fire Department (Corpo de Bombeiros), activated by dialing 193.
URBAN SETTING
The severity of vascular trauma varies, with injuries stem­ming from military- or combat-related munitions generally cause more extensive damage. ally have little experience of managing severe injury caused by military munitions and explosive devices, although the sporadic use of military-type weapons in the urban setting is a regrettable but new reality that is not unique to Brazil. Although uncommon, vascular trauma resulting from weapons such as the AR-15, AK-47, M16, and even grenades occurs on a sporadic basis in some areas of Brazil (Fig. 37.2), though the proportion of such injuries was seen to decline in a series from the Hospital Municipal Souza Aguiar (1995–2000). This observation was made during a time when the homicide rate was increasing, suggesting that high-velocity munitions remained a signicant cause of trauma including lethal injury. In an encouraging and more-recent trend, the rate of violence and the number of high-velocity gunshot wounds currently tended to in the state has plummeted.
1–3
4,5
Brazilian surgeons gener-
RURAL SETTING
Between 1% and 4% of injuries in the more remote areas of Brazil have a vascular component. Lower extremity trau­mas usually result from automobile crashes, whereas upper extremity injuries typically occur as result of factory or
401
402 SECTION 5 Global Perspectives on Vascular Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
Table 37.1 Ranking of States by Homicide Rates (per 100,000): Brazil 2000–16.
2000 2010 2016
State
Alagoas 25.6 11th 66.8 1st 55.9 3rd
Espirito Santo 46.8 3rd 50.1 2nd 32.5 16th
Pará 13.0 21st 45.9 3rd 50.9 4th
Pernambuco 54.0 1st 38.8 4th 47.6 6th
Amapá 32.5 9th 38.7 5th 49.6 5th
Paraíba 15.1 20th 38.6 6th 33.1 13th
Bahia 9.4 23rd 37.7 7th 46.5 7th
Rondônia 33.8 8th 34.6 8th 32.8 14th
Paraná 18.5 16th 34.4 9th 25.9 20th
Distrito Federal 37.5 7th 34.2 10th 22.1 22nd
Sergipe 23.3 12th 33.3 11th 64.0 1st
Mato Grosso 39.8 5th 31.7 12th 35.5 11th
Amazonas 19.8 14th 30.6 13th 29.4 18th
Ceará 16.5 17th 29.7 14th 39.8 9th
Goiás 20.2 13th 29.4 15th 43.8 8th
Roraima 39.5 6th 27.3 16th 19.8 25th
Rio de Janeiro 51.0 2nd 26.2 17th 37.6 10th
Mato Grosso do Sul 31.0 10th 25.8 18th 22.7 21st
Ri Grande do Norte 9.0 24th 22.9 19th 56.9 2nd
Tocantins 15.5 19th 22.5 20th 27.1 19th
Maranhão 6.1 27th 22.5 21st 33.7 12th
Acre 19.4 15th 19.6 22nd 29.8 17th
Rio Grande do Sul 16.3 18th 19.3 23rd 31.2 16th
Minas Gerais 11.5 22th 18.1 24th 20.7 24th
São Paulo 12.2 4th 13.9 25th 11.0 27th
Piauí 8.2 25th 13.7 26th 21.9 23rd
Santa Catarina 7.9 26th 12.9 27th 15.0 26th
Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (SIM)/Secretária de Vigilância em Saúde (SVS)/Ministério da Saúde (MS); Araujo et al. (2006), Waiselfisz (2018), and Rossi et al. (2013).
Rate Position Rate Position Rate Position
Fig. 37.1 State Institute of Cardiology Aloísio de Castro (IECAC) in Rio de Janeiro, which is the primary medical center of the authors of this international perspective.
industrial accidents, agricultural mishaps, or domestic dis­putes (i.e., knife or glass lacerations). In the case of domes­tic disputes where knife and lacerations from glass are more common, upper extremity vascular injury is often conned to the radial artery (34% of cases) or the ulnar artery (36% of cases), either of which frequently can be managed by ligation instead of repair or reconstruction.
Fig. 37.2 Right external iliac (vein and artery) following a high-velocity gunshot wound (wounding by AK-47).
AUTOMOBILE CRASHES
Brazil has one of the highest numbers of trauma deaths due to trafc, exceeded only by India, China, the United States,
37 • Brazil 403
https://t.me/medicina_free
and Russia. Between 1980 and 2011, almost one million people died due to trafc accidents in the country; between 2000 and 2010, the number of fatalities increased from 28,995 to 42,844, a 32.3% increase. Males accounted for
82.3% of this total and the highest rates were observed in the Midwest and South regions, with rates of 29.0 and 25.4 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants. Motorcyclists accounted for 76.9% of all deaths. The trend of motorcycle fatalities has also been found in Great Britain, with an annual increase of 4.6% in hospitalizations of road accidents. In Brazil, a 2008 study from Campinas, State of São Paulo, recorded a signicant increase in fatal trafc accidents with motorcyclists accounting for
49.3% of deaths in trafc.
6
Evaluation and Diagnosis of Vascular Injury in Brazil
There is wide disparity in the resources available to tra­uma patients in the more remote and smaller towns of Brazil and the resources available to patients in the larger urban medical centers. In the metropolitan areas of Brazil, the routine triage, evaluation, and diagnosis of vascu­lar injury is similar to that in other developed countries of the world. A detailed summary of the discrepancy of resources between public and private medical centers in Brazil is beyond the scope of this review. As such, this report focuses on the diagnosis and management of vas­cular injury in Rio de Janeiro, which has a population of more than 7.5 million people and is the second largest city in Brazil. In this setting, the prehospital evaluation of the trauma victim is divided into four phases, all conducted by the Fire Department (emergency physicians):
1. Rapid assessment: Completed in a matter of minutes, this
phase aims to diagnose and treat conditions that are life­threatening and to evaluate whether a patient is critical.
2. Critical intervention and transportation: Transportation to
the one of seven trauma referral centers in Rio de Janeiro should occur immediately after stabilization procedures are completed.
3. Nonessential procedures: These are deferred until after the
patient is transported to a trauma referral center.
4. Detailed examination: This examination is to diagnose
injuries that were not observed during the rapid assess­ment. For critical patients, this phase must be performed during transportation; whereas, for stable patients, it can be performed on the scene in less than 5 minutes.
and any lifesaving maneuvers are performed, the patient is usually transferred to one of three locations: radiology for additional imaging, the intensive care unit for moni­toring and resuscitation, or the operating room for resus­citation and repair. In most cases of significant vascular trauma, patients are transferred from the resuscitation room to the operating room where additional imaging and repair can be performed as needed while resuscita­tion is ongoing.
Vascular Injury Patterns and Treatment Strategies
A retrospective study from the Municipal Hospital Souza Aguiar (one of the largest emergency centers in Latin America) between 1998 and 2008 reported 1478 vascular injuries in 1236 patients. Like other regions of the world, ndings from this study revealed that vascular trauma in Brazil occurs most commonly in men (73% of the cohort) under 40 years of age (69% of the cohort). The main mechanism of vascular injury in this study was gunshot wound (73%) with low-velocity injuries being more common than high-velocity wounds (83% and 17%, respectively). The most common anatomic location of vascular injury was the lower extremities followed by the upper extremi­ties (54% and 33%, respectively). Approximately 5% of the vascular injuries were in the cervical region with a similarly small percentage in the abdomen (5%) and the thorax (3%). Surgical management of vascular injury in this retrospec­tive series consisted of primary anastomosis (39%), graft reconstruction (21%), ligation (16%), and suture repair (12%). Primary amputation was reported in only 1.5% of the cases of extremity vascular trauma. The main con­duit used as a vascular substitute was autologous vein, with synthetic grafts used in only 5% of the reconstruc­tions. When an autologous conduit was used, great saphe­nous vein was used in 90% of cases (Fig. 37.3), with arm cephalic vein used in few instances (1.3%). Unsurprisingly (and like other regions of the world), patients with vascular
Referral trauma centers in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, and São Paulo use modern resuscitation rooms, which are accessible to prehospital emergency vehicle(s) and providers with ample space for a multidis­ciplinary team to quickly triage and perform a range of diagnostic and resuscitative maneuvers. These resuscita­tion rooms are equipped with radiography and ultrasound equipment to perform diagnostic imaging and assist with vascular access, as well as operative equipment to facili­tate resuscitation (i.e., transfusion), fracture stabiliza­tion, and immediate lifesaving interventions. Depending on the injury, as soon as the initial survey is complete
Fig. 37.3 Saphenous vein interposition graft for arterial reconstitution.
404 SECTION 5 Global Perspectives on Vascular Trauma
https://t.me/medicina_free
and nonvascular trauma (i.e., polytrauma) had the high­est rates of mortality in the review, especially patients with vascular trauma and concomitant cranial and/or thoracic
7
injury.
ENDOVASCULAR FACILITIES
Sufce it to say that, as in other areas of the world, endovas­cular technologies (i.e., balloons, stents, and stent grafts) have played increasingly important roles in managing some patterns of vascular trauma, especially in the larger and better-equipped tertiary trauma centers in Brazil (Fig. 37.4). In general, endovascular stent graft manage- ment of vascular trauma is reserved for central vascu­lar injuries of the aorta and its proximal branch vessels, such as the subclavian, intrathoracic carotid, and even occasionally a mesenteric vascular injury. these therapies, the development of a single physical location (i.e., resuscitation with angiography, percuta­neous techniques, and operative repair) where percuta­neous therapies, operative interventions, cross-sectional imaging, and initial critical care can all be delivered is extremely attractive. This concept of hybrid surgery and resuscitation has been used in the main trauma centers in our country. The vascular surgeon on duty is part of the emergency surgical team and works together with the trauma team to control bleeding and treat vascular injury. Severely injured patients are taken to the operat­ing room and placed in a surgical radioscopy table. There are standard angiography equipment, diagnostic marker ush catheters, and guide wires for most vascular inter­ventions. Equipment specic to aortic interventions, including large diameter sheaths, super-stiff guidewires, and varying sizes and types of aortic endografts are avail­able. In this way, hybrid procedures are performed in some University Hospitals.
8–10
To deliver
SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS
Carotid Injuries
Lesions of the common and internal carotid artery may cause thrombosis and/or hemorrhage, especially when the wound is lateral or in the intimal lesion, which may go unno­ticed and cause future problems (i.e., pseudoaneurysm). Our experience is that an open repair and reconstruction is the best option, even in patients with neurologic symptoms. A neurological assessment of the patient before and after the operation is essential to outline the best therapeutic course and to assess its outcome. For injuries to the external carotid artery and its branches, endovascular embolization has been useful with good results for these authors.
Subclavian Injuries
Like others, the authors recognize that there is a signi­cant difference in the surgical approach to the three dis­tinct segments of the subclavian artery. The intrathoracic segment of the subclavian artery is typically approached using a high anterolateral thoracotomy with or without a separate supraclavicular exposure of the more distal artery. Because of the challenges associated with exposing and controlling the intrathoracic subclavian artery, the authors have found this injury location particularly well suited for endovascular treatment using a covered stent. The more distal subclavian artery segments behind and distal to the rst rib can be exposed with a supraclavicular incision often combined with an infraclavicular approach of the axillary artery. The authors have found endovascu­lar repair of the more distal subclavian and even proximal axillary artery favorable in some cases (Fig. 37.5).
Cardiac Injuries
Cardiac trauma has high mortality. It can cause exsan­guination, varying degrees of mediastinal and pleural
Fig. 37.4 (A) Computed tomographic angiography showing blunt injury of the thoracic aorta (pseudoaneurysm) caused by an automobile accident. (B) Digital subtraction angiogram of thoracic endovascular aortic repair stent-graft. Note variant aortic arch branching anatomy (origin of left common carotid artery from brachiocephalic artery).