Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 978 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
7 Мб
Скачать
Facial Trauma 7
https://t.me/med1917
ORBIT
Jaquiéry Classification of Orbital Fractures
is system describes orbital fractures in relation to size of defects, anatomical area of orbit involved and whether the bony ledge at the medial margin of the infraorbital ssure is spared. Patterns of fractures with large defects of the orbital oor and medial wall correspond to increasing complexity of surgical repair.
1. Isolated defect of the orbital oor or of the medial wall, 1–2cm2, within the anterior two-thirds
2. Defect of the orbital oor and/or of the medial wall, >2cm2 , within the anterior two-thirds, bony ledge preserved at the medial margin of the infraorbital ssure
3. Defect of the orbital oor and/or of the medial wall, >2cm2 , within the anterior two-thirds, missing bony ledge medial to the infraorbital ssure
4. Defect of the entire orbital oor and of the medial wall, extending into the posterior one-third, missing bony ledge medial to the infraorbital ssure
5. Same as #4 plus defect extending into the orbital roof
MIDFACE
Le Fort Classification of Fractures
is classication describes the degree of separation of midfa­cial bones from the skull base.
1. Guerin/oating plate – midface retrusion, anterior open bite (AOB), midface elongation
2. Pyramidal – at or below frontonasal suture, involving lacri­mal bones, oor and rim, infraorbital foramen to pterygo­maxillary ssure and pterygoid plates
3. Craniofacial disjunction
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
8 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Stranc ‘Plane’ Classification of Nasal Fractures
is classication describes nasal fractures in terms of three dierent planes, which correspond to extent of injury from the nasal tip. Extensive injuries can lead to involvement and disrup­tion of the NOE complex. Hence, more complex surgical man­agement is warranted with these types of injuries.
1. Distal bridge and tip – septal deviation, therefore septorhino­plasty (SRP)
2. Mid-dorsum – saddle nose, therefore dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty
3. Pyriform aperture ± NOE, therefore ORIF and medial canthal resuspension
MAXILLA AND ZYGOMA
Henderson Classification of Zygomatic Fractures
is system classies zygomatic injuries according to degree of fracture displacement and involvement of the zygomatico-max­illary complex (ZMC). Cosmetic and functional decits are asso­ciated with disruption of the fronto-zygomatic (FZ) suture and will necessitate surgical management with two-point arch xa­tion aer elevation. More complex fractures are associated with comminution.
1. Undisplaced
2. Arch
3. ZMC (FZ intact)
4. ZMC (FZ displaced/disrupted)
5. Pure blow out
6. Rim only
7. Comminuted
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Facial Trauma 9
https://t.me/med1917
Zingg Classification of ZMC Fractures
is classication describes zygomatic fractures according to the areas of ZMC involved, which form part of the lateral wall, orbital oor and cheek projections.
A. Single pillar
1. Arch
2. Lateral orbit
3. Infraorbital rim B. All four areas (arch, FZ, ZM buttress, infraorbital rim/oor) C. Comminuted
MANDIBLE
Frequency of Mandible Fractures Overall by Site
is list describes frequency of fractures according to the ana­tomical site of the mandible. e most common site is the angle of the mandible, and the site least involved is the coronoid pro­cess of the mandible.
1. Angle 31%
2. Condyle 18%
3. Body 15%
4. Parasymphysis 14%
5. Symphysis 8%
6. Canine 7%
7. Ramus 6%
8. Coronoid 1%
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
10 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Loukota Classification of Condyle Fractures
According to this classication, condylar fractures are described in relation to the Loukota line, which runs perpendicular through the sigmoid notch to the tangent of the ramus of the mandible.
A. Head (fracture line starting in the articular surface and may
extend outside the capsule) B. Neck (mainly above the Loukota line) C. Base (mainly below the Loukota line and behind the man-
dibular foramen)
Luhr Classification of Atrophic Mandibles
is system describes mandibular atrophy in terms of residual vertical bone height and straties it into mild, moderate and severe for both partially dentate and edentulous mandibles.
1. 16–20mm (typically managed with load-sharing
osteosynthesis)
2. 11–15mm
3. ≤10mm (typically managed with load-bearing osteosynthesis)
Neff Classification of Condylar Head Fracture
is classication system groups head of condyle fractures of the mandible according to the involvement of medial and lat­eral components and whether vertical mandibular height is preserved. More complex patterns involve capsular attachments and fracture dislocations of the condylar head.
A. Fracture with displacement of the medial parts of condyle –
vertical mandibular height is preserved B. Fracture of lateral condyle – decrease in mandibular height C. High capsular fractures/dislocations
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Facial Trauma 11
https://t.me/med1917
Strasbourg Osteosynthesis Research Group (SORG) Management Classification of Subcondylar Fractures
is classication allows the assessment and management of subcondylar fractures of the mandible based on degree of displacement and the corresponding management strategies.
1. Minimally displaced (<10 degrees, l<2mm) – closed treatment
2. Moderately displaced (>10 degrees, 2–15mm) – ORIF
3. Severely displaced (>45 degrees, >15mm) – ORIF
SORG Strong Evidence for Condylar FractureORIF
e following list highlights criteria for which there is a strong case for open reduction internal xation of condylar fractures.
≥2mm loss of height
≥45 degrees of tilt
Bilateral condyles
Unstable midface fractures with condyle(s)
Unstable occlusion
Periodontal disease/fewer than three teeth per quadrant
Physio is impossible
NB: 10–45 degrees of tilt have mixed evidence.
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
12 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Spiessl and Schroll Classification of Condyle Fractures
is classication describes condyle fractures in relation to higher and lower neck fractures and the associated angulation and displacement of the condyle. e highest class includes frac­ture of the condylar head.
1. Neck fracture, undisplaced
2. Low neck with angulation
3. High neck with angulation
4. Low neck with dislocation
5. High neck with dislocation
6. Fracture of condylar head
Zide and Kent Criteria for ORIF Condyle
e following list highlights the absolute and relative indications for ORIF of condylar fractures.
Absolute indications:
Displacement into middle cranial fossa (MCF)
Foreign body
Lateral extra-capsular displacement
Malocclusion not amenable to closed reduction
Relative indications:
Bilateral edentulous mandible fractures and no Gunning splints
Not possible, midfacial fractures with AP discrepancy, peri­odontal disease or loss of teeth, unilateral condyle
Fracture with unstable glenoid base
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Facial Trauma 13
https://t.me/med1917
NERVES AND SOFT TISSUE INJURIES
Binocular Diplopia Classification
e following system describes diplopia when both eyes are open and can include a mechanical component involving the extra­ocular muscles, a neurogenic component as a result of nerve injury/neuronal decit or a combination of both.
1. Mechanical (positive forced duction test, upward gaze aected) – MOST COMMON
2. Neurogenic (negative/normal forced duction test, downward gaze aected)*
3. Mixed (forced duction positive and all vertical gaze aected)*
*Types 2 and 3 warrant neuro-ophthalmic input, usually resolve spontaneously by 1year.
Classification of Neuromas in Nerve Injury
e following list describes benign growths of nerve tissue as a result of injury.
Lateral adhesive
Lateral exophytic
Neuroma in continuity (seen in Sunderland 4)
Amputation neuroma
Meyer Protocol for Injury Causing Dysesthesia
e following protocol allows the stratication of abnormal pain sensation into various groups and their management options.
TEST AT 3 MONTHS
Level A – brushstroke, if painful is allodynia
Level B – repetitive stimulus, if painful is hyperpathia
Level C – painful stimulus, if exaggerated response is hyperalgesia
Do a diagnostic nerve block – if it helps, then do MICROSURGERY; if it persists, then management will include medical/physio/CBT and ‘sensory re-education’
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
14 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
Meyer Protocol for Injury Causing Loss of Sensation
is protocol describes a strategy to diagnose the severity of sensory loss as a result of nerve injury and gives the management options.
TEST AT 3 MONTHS
Level A – two-point discrimination with Boley gauge/direc­tion of stroke
Level B – contact (touch), if normal it is mild hypoesthesia
Level C – painful stimulus, if normal it is moderate hypoes­thesia, if not it is severe hypoesthesia or anaesthesia
Complete anaesthesia is treated earlier than 3 months (i.e., 1 month), but for all others wait 3 months before moving on to microsurgery
If microsurgery fails, then management will include ‘sensory re-education’
Nerve Injury Classifications by Seddon and Sunderland
The following system categorises nerve injuries according to the anatomical parts of the nerve tissue involved. More complex injuries require management with microsurgical repair.
Seddon 1=Sunderland 1=NEUROPRAXIA (hours to 1 month), sheath intact and has nerve conduction
Seddon 2=Sunderland 2=AXONOTMESIS (2 months), sheath intact but no conduction, has brillation potentials ifmotor nerve
Sunderland 3=AXONOTMESIS (3 months), loss of endoneu­rium so Wallerian degeneration, has brillation potentials if motor nerve
Sunderland 4=NEURONOTMESIS (4 months), if no resolu­tion then microsurgery, neuromas form, has brillation potentials if motor nerve
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Facial Trauma 15
https://t.me/med1917
Seddon 3=Sunderland 5=NEURONOTMESIS (complete transection), needs microrepair, has brillation potentials if motor nerve
MacKinnon 6=MIXED, some fascicles are aected more severely than others
Timing of Nerve Repair
e following list describes the timing of nerve repair as the paramount factor which dictates the success of regaining nerve function.
Immediate
Delayed primary – within days
Delayed secondary – more than 3 weeks aer injury
Trauma Zones Neck (Inferior to Superior)
e following list describes zones of the neck in relation to neck trauma. Each zone contains vital head and neck structures which are at risk, depending on the level of the injury. is can serve as a useful framework in the clinical assessment and man­agement of neck injuries.
1. Clavicle to inferior cricoid (highest mortality, dicult to gain access and vascular control)
2. Cricoid to angle (most common zone, amenable to surgical access)
3. Angle to base of skull (more dicult to access than zone 2)
FURTHER READING
Alao T, Waseem M. Neck trauma [Updated 2022 Aug 7].
In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Chhabra A, Ahlawat S, Belzberg A, Andreseik G. Peripheral nerve
injury grading simplified on MRneurography: As referenced
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
16 Classifications and Lists in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
https://t.me/med1917
to Seddon and Sunderland classifications. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014;24(3):217–24.
Cornelius CP, Audigé L, Kunz C, etal. The comprehensive AOCMF
classification system: Mandible fractures—level 3 tutorial. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;7(Suppl 1):S31–43.
Gonty AA, Marciani RD, Adornato DC. Management of frontal
sinus fractures: Areview of 33 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57(4):372–9.
Jaquiéry C, Aeppli C, Cornelius P, Palmowsky A, Kunz C, Hammer
B. Reconstruction of orbital wall defects: Critical review of 72 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(3):193–9.
Kassam K, Messiha A. Fractured zygomatic arch: Atraumatic
cause for trismus. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2013202633.
Loukota RA, Eckelt U, De Bont L, Rasse M. Subclassification of
fractures of the condylar process of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;43(1):72–3.
Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, etal. Management of the
medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: The importance of the central fragment in classification and treat ment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(5):843–53.
Neff A, Cornelius CP, Rasse M, Torre DD, Audigé L. The com-
prehensive AOCMF classification system: Condylar process fractures—level 3 tutorial. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014;7(Suppl. 1):S44–58.
Patel BC, Wright T, Waseem M. Le Fort fractures [Updated 2023
Apr 3]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Sawhney C, Arora MK, Kumar S, Barik PK, Ranjan P. Initial man-
agement in blunt trauma neck. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34(2):275–76.
Seddon HJ. Areview of work on peripheral nerve injuries
in Great Britain during World War II. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1948;108(2):160–8.
Slutsky DJ, Hentz VR, Jabaley M, eds. Primary nerve repair
peripheral nerve surgery: Practical applications in the upper extremity. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006: 23–38.
-
t.me/Dr_Mouayyad_AlbtousH
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025