Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 756 - файл
.pdf
Preface
https://t.me/med1917
xi
amended, updated, or replaced. Moreover, it can be accessed with a variety of desk
and portable devices from essentially anywhere.
One should not deride the praiseworthy approach. Nevertheless, what are review
journals, electronic or in paper format, if not ongoing textbooks with new chapters
all the time? Typical publications in other areas, however occasionally concerning
surgery like CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Disease-A-Month, exist since
respectively 1950 and 1954. More focused journals like Surgery, Gynecology and
Obstetrics (now Journal of the American College of Surgeons/JACS) have been
publishing reviews since the rst half of last century, in early times of the narrative
model and more recently as scoping, systematic, or umbrella modalities with or
without meta-analysis.
It is unprecedented for standard books to be retracted or detracted as a consequence of such competition. There will always be room for virtual and printed material presented as journals, books, bulletins, internet sites, or electronic libraries. A
galaxy of opportunities means that everyone can nd his or her slot under the sun.
The critical point is that all should be authoritative, pertinent, useful, well- referenced,
and as up to date as feasible. Last minute electronic text and video guides, checklists, and technical sketches are not hard to come by, so missing or superseded
information can and should be replaced and complemented.
According to renowned inventor Richard Buckminster Fuller (1895–1983), general human knowledge was estimated to duplicate every century until 1900. The
interval dropped to a quarter of a century by 1945. Now doubling occurs after 12 h
only [8]. Conicting data is available for medical knowledge, yet still overpowering: it doubled every 50 years until 1950, then every 7 years in 1980, every 3–5
years by 2011, and the forecast for 2020 was 73 days [9]. Evidently, these gures
are questionable and they oftentimes include pure trash. Regarding trustworthy and
credible information, only a handful is directly or indirectly pertinent to surgery
although still representing a data deluge.
Not even electronic chapters can be prepared every day or every few hours, like
buns on the production line of a bakery, so as not to miss the very latest advances. If
by chance they were, and this would require a Herculean commitment by both
authors and readers, there would still exist fresher material waiting in the pipeline.
It is not unlike the dog trying to catch its tail, or Aristotle’s paradox of the hare chasing the slow tortoise. No matter how much success is accomplished or how punctiliously updated a text is, this will always be a job half done, a Sisyphean,
never-ending task.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the rst book addressing a continuum of management,
care, and strategies for high-risk surgical candidates, not just for conventional populations
or encompassing routine therapeutic approaches. One that bypasses articial dilemmas
generated by a mega-data search of the literature, or improvised solutions which lack the
indispensable groundwork, targeting instead tested and proven even though often innova-
tive options and pathways. And despite multi-authorship from major universities in several
continents, one with a streamlined presentation of conditions, tools and strategies, parsed
and curated for ready implementation.

xii
https://t.me/med1917
Preface
References
1. Carson B, Lewis G.Take the risk: learning to identify, choose and live with acceptable risk.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan; 2007.
2. Barton CR, Beeson M.Anesthesia for trauma during wartime. CRNA. 1997;8(1):2–12.
3. Hoornweg LL, Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Koelemay MJW, Legemate DA, Balm
R.Meta analysis on mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc
Surg. 2008;35:558–70.
4. Gerbode F.A denition of surgery. Ann Surg. 1963;158(5):775–7.
5. Pierre NL, Yeo CJ, Tholey RM.What we owe the world wars: challenges that fueled surgical
innovation. Am Surg. 2021;87(9):1525–28.
6. Forrest Bird. percussionaire.com/about/our- legacy. Accessed 22 Nov 2022.
7. Stanbouly D, Chuang SK.Humility will get you further than ego or pride in your career as a
surgeon. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;123(3):269–70.
8. Ray A.Human knowledge is doubling every 12 h. www.linkedin.com. Accessed 3 Jan 2023.
9. Anonymous. The importance of critical thinking skills at a time of exponential growth of
medical knowledge. https://ifdhe.aha.org/education- events/importance- critical- thinking- skills-
time- exponential- growth- medical- knowledge. Accessed 18 Feb 2023.
Sao Paulo, Brazil JoelFaintuch
Boston, MA, USA SalomaoFaintuch

Contents
https://t.me/med1917
Part I Preoperative Evaluation and Management
1 Surgical Risk in Distressed or Underserved Populations . . . . . . . . . . 3
McKenzi Heide, Emma Johnson, and Christopher DuCoin
2 Implementation and Utilization of Checklists in Surgical
Patient Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Michael Kochis, Nathan Turley, Mary Brindle, and Alex Haynes
3 Controversies in Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Orthopaedic Surgery . . . 39
Elisha Krasin
4 Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring for High Risk
Surgical Patients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Raj Madhani, Jingyuan Biaesch, and Austin Puchany
Part II Lifestyle Interventions
5 Prehabilitation for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Joel Lambert, Daren Subar, and Christopher Gaffney
6 Efficacy of Prehabilitation in Abdominal Cancer Surgery . . . . . . . . . 81
Lara Edbrooke, Shaza Abo, and Linda Denehy
7 Elective Surgery for Patients with Substance Use Disorder
or Recent Substance Misuse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Talia Scott and Ethan O. Bryson
8 Illicit Drugs and Candidates for Endoscopy and Surgery . . . . . . . . . 127
John P. Gallagher, Patrick A. Twohig, Agnes Crnic, and
Fedja A. Rochling
9 Nutritional Care in Gastrointestinal Surgery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Maria Wobith and Arved Weimann
xiii

xiv
https://t.me/med1917
Contents
Part III Surgical Specialties
10 Risk Reduction in Diabetic Patients Undergoing
Orthopaedic Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Michael S. Pinzur
11 Advanced Trauma Life Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
Christopher R. Parrino, Ryan B. Fransman, Andrew J. Varone,
and Samuel M. Galvagno Jr.
12 Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review for the General
and Trauma Surgeon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
Corrado P. Marini, John McNelis, and Patrizio Petrone
13 Current Management of Post-operative Mesenteric Ischemia . . . . . . 209
Rohan N. Kulkarni and Mohammad H. Eslami
14 Safety and Success in Modern Liver Transplantation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
Madelynn Zhang, Navdeep Singh, William K. Washburn,
and Austin D. Schenk
Part IV Protocols of Special Relevance
15 Immunization Routines for Surgical Splenectomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
Michelle Lippincott and Vic Velanovich
16 Management of the Difficulty Airway in the Perioperative
Period (A Surgical Perspective) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
R. H. Kelley, D. C. Sullivan, and J. A. Scott
Part V Fluids, Electrolytes and Shock
17 Damage Control Resuscitation: Massive Transfusion
Protocols and Pharmacologic Adjuncts
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
David Ray Velez
18 Perioperative Fluid Management and Volume Assessment. . . . . . . . . 285
Raksha Bangalore, Kathryn Jan, Jennifer Elia,
and Kunal Karamchandani
19 Perioperative Fluid Administration and Complications in
Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305
Birgitte Brandstrup and Ann Merete Møller
20 The Surgical Critically Ill Patients: A Focus on Deresuscitation
Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
Martin Ruste, Jean-Luc Fellahi, and Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze
21 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
Sasa Rajsic, Benedikt Treml, and Robert Breitkopf

Contents
https://t.me/med1917
xv
Part VI Perioperative Surgical Challenges
22 Damage Control Laparotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
David Ray Velez and Anthony Joseph Duncan
23 Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Emergency
Decompressive Laparotomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Sissy-Amelie Engelien and Dirk R. Bulian
24 Post-Operative Complications After Emergency Laparotomy . . . . . . 395
Zi Qin Ng and Dieter Weber
25 Open Abdomen as an Effective Therapy for Abdominal Sepsis,
Bedside Assistance for the Surgeon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417
Thijs Cornette and Frederik Berrevoet
26 Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Imaging and Intervention . . . . . . . . . . 433
Lucy Rose Howroyd, Ben Hawthorn, Nirav Patel, and
Lakshmi Ratnam
27 Options on Conservative Treatment in Acute
Surgical Emergencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
Leandro Stoll Coelho, Vinicius Rocha-Santos, and Joel Faintuch
Part VII Bedside and Adjunct Procedures
28 Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Gastrostomy Placement . . . . . . . . 473
Samuel B. Fordyce, Rooshi K. Parikh, and Stephen P. Reis
29 Optimal Pharmacotherapy Strategies for Enhanced
Postoperative Recovery in High-Risk Surgeries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489
Richard Parrish and Rachelle Findley
30 Blood Component Alternatives During Acute Hemorrhage . . . . . . . . 517
Lydia Buzzard and Martin Schreiber
Part VIII Wound Care
31 Skin Wound Complications in High-Risk Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 535
Corey Keenan, Elof Eriksson, and Kristo Nuutila
32 Can Negative Pressure Dressings Prevent Wound Infection
After Surgery? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553
Richard J. B. Walker and Paul J. Karanicolas
Part IX Innovative Approaches
33 Practical Implementation of Extracorporeal Membrane
Oxygenation in the Critically Ill Surgical Patient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 569
Taylor N. Ziegler and Shaun L. Thompson

xvi
https://t.me/med1917
Contents
34 Improving the Selection of Patients for High-Risk Surgery: The
Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 587
Russell Seth Martins and Charles E. Binkley
35 Artificial Intelligence Surgery: How Autonomous Actions and
Surgiomics Can Decrease Risk in High-Risk Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605
Nouredin Messaoudi and Andrew A. Gumbs
36 Machine Learning and High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Risk Scoring. . . 621
Michael P. Rogers, Haroon Janjua, Meagan Read, Emily Grimsley,
and Paul C. Kuo
37 Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Cardiac Surgery . . . . . . . 629
Habib Jabagi, Taleen Haddad, and Louise Y. Sun
38 Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders After Cardiac Surgery . . . . 651
Juan Pablo Espinosa-Leon, Andres de Lima, and Brian O’Gara
Part X End of Life Care and Other Ethical Challenges
39 Palliative Surgery: When To and When Not To? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 673
Jaewook Shin and Thomas J. Miner
40 How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 693
Karishma Mistry, Allie Stover, and Sabha Ganai
Part XI Supplementary Material
41 Colorectal Surgery in Critically Unwell Patients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705
Ashwin Subramaniam, Robert Wengritzky, and Vladimir Bolshinsky
42 Useful Tables and Internet Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 733
Joel Faintuch, Jacob J. Faintuch, and Asher Mishaly
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 747

Part I
https://t.me/med1917
Preoperative Evaluation and Management

Chapter 1
https://t.me/med1917
Surgical Risk inDistressed or Underserved
Populations
McKenziHeide, EmmaJohnson, andChristopherDuCoin
Introduction
Every surgical procedure comes with an associated risk of morbidity and mortality.
However, there is large disparity in post-surgical outcomes between disadvantaged
communities and their more privileged counterparts that is not explained simply by
natural variability in inherent risk. For example, when a Black adult man is rolled in
to an elective or emergent surgical procedure, he has as much as a 36% higher
chance of death than his White counterpart [1]. In addition, ones’ economic status
can accurately predict their life expectancy [2, 9]. Although we persistently optimize surgical techniques, pre and postoperative management and standards of care,
this gap in outcomes continues to elude us, likely signifying a systemic failure to
address the true issue.
Medical care is estimated to account for roughly 20% of modiable risk factors
that contribute length and quality of life [3]. The remaining 80% are composed of
modiable risk factors that can be dened as social determinants of health (SDOH).
The CDC describes these SDOH as “nonmedical factors that inuence health outcomes … the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age, and the
wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life” [4].
Five key concepts of social determinants of health [4, 5]:
• Healthcare access and quality:
• Including geographic proximity to care, monetary access to care, and perceived
discrimination by providers preventing care
• Education access and quality:
M. Heide (*) · E. Johnson · C. DuCoin
Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine,
Tampa, FL, USA
e-mail: ejohnson229@usf.edu; cducoin@usf.edu
Switzerland AG 2024
J. Faintuch, S. Faintuch (eds.), Recent Strategies in High Risk Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56270-9_1
3© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature

4
https://t.me/med1917
• Quality of free public schooling and access to higher education
• Social and community context:
• Social support from relationships and interactions with family, friends, co-
workers, and community members as well as social stressors such as racism,
marginalization, and bigotry
• Economic stability:
• Economic Stability refers to the stress of poverty, access to proper nutrition, and
insurance etc. Economic stability is often used interchangeably with socioeco-
nomic status (SES). In literature, SES is often assessed using the ADI index
which is a composite measure of 17 census variables based on income, educa-
tion, household characteristics, and housing [6]. Additionally, SES may also be
described using geographic locations via the Social Vulnerability index (SVI)
which also uses census data to rank locations on 16 social factors, including
poverty, lack of vehicle access, and crowded housing, and minority status [7].
• Neighborhood and built environment:
• Neighborhood is the socioeconomic composition, crime, social cohesion, and
support of the community as well as disorder such as trash, grafti, abandoned
or dilapidated buildings, and infrastructure [5].
• Built environment is the physical attributes of our surroundings that inuence
individual health behaviors. Examples include walkability and recreation; health
amenities such as well stocked grocery stores and parks, and undesirable ameni-
ties such as fast-food restaurants and liquor stores [5].
M. Heide et al.
It is well established that SDOH are associated with health outcomes in general
and outcomes of surgical procedures. Despite this knowledge, the medical disparities
seen along the lines of class, race, and location have not improved and continue to
drastically affect the prognosis and outcomes of patients. One possible reason for this
is that though these factors are often separated in literature for ease of organization
and study, they will always be intertwined in reality. The systemic and confounding
nature of SDOH makes them difcult to address as an individual practitioner. In the
following chapter we will describe the outcomes of high-risk surgeries in economically and socially marginalized communities, with the ultimate goal being to identify
specic variables seen in literature that may play a signicant role in disparities and
provide possible solutions for the individual surgeon in their practice.
Cardiothoracic andVascular Surgeries
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in the United
States. Thus, the effects of SDOH on CVD in particular have been more broadly studied than many other disease states. Regarding socioeconomic status, it is known that
increasing social disadvantage is associated with more prevalent cardiovascular risk
factors, inammation, and incidental cardiovascular disease [8]. As for race, Black
adults experience higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension

1 Surgical Risk inDistressed or Underserved Populations
https://t.me/med1917
and obesity and are more than twice as likely to die of CVD, relative to White adults
[9]. When concerning neighborhood and built environment, those residing in highvulnerability areas are less likely to receive care from high-volume hospitals and less
likely to have stable primary care [9, 10]. Cardiothoracic and vascular surgeries are
not immune to the effects of SDOH.When studied independently from chronic CVD,
post-surgical outcomes in these elds are shown to be signicantly linked to SDOH.
There is a clear racial divide between Black and White patients in surgical outcomes of many common high-risk cardiac surgeries. Wu etal. found Black race to
be an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality following a carotid endarterectomy (CEA), with Black patients also showing a greater proportion of in-hospital
death following a CEA procedure [11]. While studying race and coronary artery
bypass graft (CABG) outcomes, Rangrass etal. found that non-white patients had
33% higher risk-adjusted mortality rates after the procedure than White patients
(odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95%CI, 1.23-1.45) [12]. Some of these gaps may be due to
the quality of hospital and, when assessed independently, differences in hospital
quality explained 35% of the observed disparity in mortality rates between races
(OR, 1.22; 95%CI, 1.12-1.34). Overall Black patients are more likely to be in a low
SES, present with greater disease burden, and receive care from lower volume surgeons and hospitals [9–12], all of which heavily impact surgical outcomes.
Low socioeconomic status, independent of race, is strongly associated with
increased postoperative mortality and readmission following high-risk surgeries such
as AAA repair, CABG and CEA [11– 15]. Impoverished patients are signicantly
more likely to present with ruptured AAA or symptomatic disease at initial carotid
revascularizations, as well as more likely to undergo emergency rather than elective
repair compared to patients of higher income class [11, 13]. Such differences in lowincome populations may be attributed to decreased compliance with health screening,
decreased access to primary care coverage, and increased use of low-volume surgeons
[13]. It is logical to assume that the racial disparity is rooted in lower SES, as many of
the same contributing SDOH are often cited when studying race and economic status,
however SES does not fully explain outcome disparities as Black patients have worse
outcomes following cardiac procedures than White patients of similar SES [15]. This
suggests racism plays a fundamental role in disease or access to care and these healthcare disparities cannot be solely attributed to economic status. It is clear that while
prior disease state affects surgical outcomes, there is no one sole contributor to risk.
Rather, outcomes are affected by the complex interplay between socioeconomic status, access to health care, and the adverse effects (both generational and current) of
stress and racism on overall health and wellbeing.
5
Surgical Oncology
Not surprisingly, the trend of health disparities is also seen in surgical oncology and
those affected by these inequalities are disproportionately Black and Latinx. Despite
NIH-funded research requiring inclusion of minorities since 1993, Stewart etal.
found that racial and ethnic minorities and elderly patients are less likely to be
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
